Grant Guideline for FY 2012, 62568-62591 [2011-25893]

Agencies

• State Justice Institute

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 195 (Friday, October 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62568-62591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25893]



[[Page 62567]]

Vol. 76

Friday,

No. 195

October 7, 2011

Part III





State Justice Institute





-----------------------------------------------------------------------





Grant Guideline for FY 2012; Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 76 , No. 195 / Friday, October 7, 2011 / 
Notices

[[Page 62568]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

STATE JUSTICE INSTITUTE


Grant Guideline for FY 2012

AGENCY: State Justice Institute.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Guideline sets forth the administrative, programmatic, 
and financial requirements attendant to Fiscal Year 2012 State Justice 
Institute grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts.

DATES: October 7, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Mattiello, Executive 
Director, State Justice Institute, 11951 Freedom Drive, Suite 1020, 
Reston, VA 22314, 571-313-8843, jonathan.mattiello@sji.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the State Justice Institute Act 
of 1984, 42 U.S.C. 10701, et seq., as amended, SJI is authorized to 
award grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts to State and local 
courts, nonprofit organizations, and others for the purpose of 
improving the quality of justice in the State courts of the United 
States.
    The following Grant Guideline is adopted by the State Justice 
Institute for FY 2012.

Table of Contents

I. The Mission of the State Justice Institute
II. Eligibility for Award
III. Scope of the Program
IV. Grant Applications
V. Grant Application Review Procedures
VI. Compliance Requirements
VII. Financial Requirements
VIII. Grant Adjustments
     Appendix A Grant Application Forms
    [cir] Form A--Application and Application Instructions
    [cir] Form B--Certificate of State Approval and Instructions
    [cir] Form C--Project Budget and Instructions
    [cir] Form D--Assurances
    [cir] Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
    [cir] Form E--Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
     Appendix B Education Support Program (ESP) Application 
Forms (Forms ESP-1 and ESP-2)

I. The Mission of the State Justice Institute

    SJI was established by State Justice Institute Authorization Act of 
1984 (42 U.S.C. 10701 et seq.) to improve the administration of justice 
in the state courts of the United States. Incorporated in the State of 
Virginia as a private, nonprofit corporation, SJI is charged, by 
statute, with the responsibility to:
     Direct a national program of financial assistance designed 
to assure that each citizen of the United States is provided ready 
access to a fair and effective system of justice;
     Foster coordination and cooperation with the federal 
judiciary;
     Promote recognition of the importance of the separation of 
powers doctrine to an independent judiciary; and
     Encourage education for judges and support personnel of 
state court systems through national and state organizations.
    To accomplish these broad objectives, SJI is authorized to provide 
funding to state courts, national organizations which support and are 
supported by state courts, national judicial education organizations, 
and other organizations that can assist in improving the quality of 
justice in the state courts. SJI is supervised by a Board of Directors 
appointed by the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate. 
The Board is statutorily composed of six judges; a state court 
administrator; and four members of the public, no more than two can be 
of the same political party.
    Through the award of grants, contracts, and cooperative agreements, 
SJI is authorized to perform the following activities:
    A. Support technical assistance, demonstrations, special projects, 
research and training to improve the administration of justice in the 
state courts;
    B. Provide for the preparation, publication, and dissemination of 
information regarding state judicial systems;
    C. Participate in joint projects with federal agencies and other 
private grantors;
    D. Evaluate or provide for the evaluation of programs and projects 
to determine their impact upon the quality of criminal, civil, and 
juvenile justice and the extent to which they have contributed to 
improving the quality of justice in the state courts;
    E. Encourage and assist in furthering judicial education; and
    F. Encourage, assist, and serve in a consulting capacity to state 
and local justice system agencies in the development, maintenance, and 
coordination of criminal, civil, and juvenile justice programs and 
services.

II. Eligibility for Award

    SJI is authorized by Congress to award grants, cooperative 
agreements, and contracts to the following entities and types of 
organizations:
    A. State and local courts and their agencies (42 U.S.C. 
10705(b)(1)(A)).
    B. National nonprofit organizations controlled by, operating in 
conjunction with, and serving the judicial branches of state 
governments (42 U.S.C. 10705(b)(1)(B)).
    C. National nonprofit organizations for the education and training 
of judges and support personnel of the judicial branch of state 
governments (42 U.S.C. 10705(b)(1)(C)). An applicant is considered a 
national education and training applicant under section 10705(b)(1)(C) 
if:
    1. The principal purpose or activity of the applicant is to provide 
education and training to state and local judges and court personnel; 
and
    2. The applicant demonstrates a record of substantial experience in 
the field of judicial education and training.
    D. Other eligible grant recipients (42 U.S.C. 10705(b)(2)(A)-(D)).
    1. Provided that the objectives of the project can be served 
better, the Institute is also authorized to make awards to:
    a. Nonprofit organizations with expertise in judicial 
administration;
    b. Institutions of higher education;
    c. Individuals, partnerships, firms, corporations (for-profit 
organizations must waive their fees); and
    d. Private agencies with expertise in judicial administration.
    2. SJI may also make awards to state or local agencies and 
institutions other than courts for services that cannot be adequately 
provided through nongovernmental arrangements (42 U.S.C. 10705(b)(3)).
    E. Inter-agency Agreements. SJI may enter into inter-agency 
agreements with federal agencies (42 U.S.C. 10705(b)(4)) and private 
funders to support projects consistent with the purposes of the State 
Justice Institute Act.

III. Scope of the Program

    SJI is offering six types of grants in FY 2012: Project Grants, 
Technical Assistance (TA) Grants, Curriculum Adaptation and Training 
(CAT) Grants, Partner Grants, Strategic Initiative Grants and the 
Education Support Program (ESP).

A. Project Grants

    Project Grants are intended to support innovative education and 
training, research and evaluation, demonstration, and technical 
assistance projects that can improve the administration of justice in 
state courts locally or nationwide. Project Grants may ordinarily not 
exceed $300,000. Examples of expenses not covered by Project Grants 
include the salaries, benefits, or travel of full- or part-time court 
employees. Grant periods for Project Grants ordinarily may not exceed 
36 months.
    Applicants for Project Grants will be required to contribute a cash 
match of

[[Page 62569]]

not less than 50 percent of the total cost of the proposed project. In 
other words, grant awards by SJI must be matched at least dollar for 
dollar by grant applicants. Applicants may contribute the required cash 
match directly or in cooperation with third parties. Prospective 
applicants should carefully review Section VI.8. (matching 
requirements) and Section VI.16.a. (non-supplantation) of the Guideline 
prior to beginning the application process. If questions arise, 
applicants are strongly encouraged to consult SJI.
    A temporary reduced cash match process is available for state 
courts submitting Project Grant applications. The use of this cash 
match reduction authority is intended to help the state courts in this 
climate of severe budget reductions. The process requires the state 
court to formally request a reduced cash match, and that the request be 
certified by the chief justice of that state. The state court must 
explain in detail how it is facing budgetary cutbacks that will result 
in significant reductions in other services, and why it will be unable 
to undertake the project without a cash match reduction. This must be 
described in detail in the application and verified by the chief 
justice of that state. Only state courts may apply for a cash match 
reduction.
    Applicants should examine their projected project costs closely, 
and if they are unable to cover half the costs of the project, they may 
apply for a reduction in cash match. Applicants are strongly encouraged 
to provide as much cash match as possible in their application, as some 
cash match contribution is still required.
    Applicants are also encouraged to provide the percentage of budget 
reductions in their court(s), and the measures that have been taken by 
the jurisdiction/state to handle the budget shortfalls. This may 
include staff reductions, as well as reductions in services and 
programs. Some cash contribution is still required for Project Grants, 
and should be reflected in the budget proposal for the project. For 
example, if the total cost of the proposed project is $100,000, the 
normal cash match would be $50,000. However, if the applicant is unable 
to provide $50,000 for the activities, but is able to contribute 
$25,000, the budget should show the request to SJI totaling $75,000, 
with the cash match of $25,000.
    As set forth in Section I., SJI is authorized to fund projects 
addressing a broad range of program areas. Funding will not be made 
available for the ordinary, routine operations of court systems.

B. Technical Assistance (TA) Grants

    TA Grants are intended to provide state or local courts, or 
regional court associations, with sufficient support to obtain expert 
assistance to diagnose a problem, develop a response to that problem, 
and implement any needed changes. TA Grants may not exceed $50,000. 
Examples of expenses not covered by TA Grants include the salaries, 
benefits, or travel of full- or part-time court employees. Grant 
periods for TA Grants ordinarily may not exceed 24 months. In 
calculating project duration, applicants are cautioned to fully 
consider the time required to issue a request for proposals, negotiate 
a contract with the selected provider, and execute the project.
    Applicants for TA Grants will be required to contribute a total 
match of not less than 50 percent of the grant amount requested, of 
which 20 percent must be cash. In other words, an applicant seeking a 
$50,000 TA grant must provide a $25,000 match, of which up to $20,000 
can be in-kind and not less than $5,000 must be cash. TA Grant 
application procedures can be found in section IV.B.

C. Curriculum Adaptation and Training (CAT) Grants

    CAT Grants are intended to: (1) Enable courts and regional or 
national court associations to modify and adapt model curricula, course 
modules, or conference programs to meet states' or local jurisdictions' 
educational needs; train instructors to present portions or all of the 
curricula; and pilot-test them to determine their appropriateness, 
quality, and effectiveness, or (2) conduct judicial branch education 
and training programs, led by either expert or in-house personnel, 
designed to prepare judges and court personnel for innovations, 
reforms, and/or new technologies recently adopted by grantee courts. 
CAT Grants may not exceed $30,000. Examples of expenses not covered by 
CAT Grants include the salaries, benefits, or travel of full- or part-
time court employees. Grant periods for CAT Grants ordinarily may not 
exceed 12 months.
    Applicants for CAT Grants will be required to contribute a match of 
not less than 50 percent of the grant amount requested, of which 20 
percent must be cash. In other words, an applicant seeking a $30,000 
CAT grant must provide a $15,000 match, of which up to $12,000 can be 
in-kind and not less than $3,000 must be cash. CAT Grant application 
procedures can be found in section IV.C.

D. Partner Grants

    Partner Grants are intended to allow SJI and federal, state, or 
local agencies or foundations, trusts, or other private entities to 
combine financial resources in pursuit of common interests. SJI and its 
financial partners may set any level for Partner Grants, subject to the 
entire amount of the grant being available at the time of the award. 
Grant periods for Partner Grants ordinarily may not exceed 36 months.
    Partner Grants are subject to the same cash match requirement as 
Project Grants. In other words, grant awards by SJI must be matched at 
least dollar-for-dollar. Partner Grants are coordinated by the funding 
organizations. Partner Grant application procedures can be found in 
section IV.E.

E. Strategic Initiatives Grants

    The Strategic Initiatives Grants (SIG) program provides SJI with 
the flexibility to address national court issues as they occur, and 
develop solutions to those problems. This is an innovative approach 
where SJI uses its expertise and the expertise and knowledge of its 
grantees to address key issues facing state courts across the United 
States.
    The funding is used for grants or contractual services, and any 
remaining balance not used for the SIG program will become available 
for SJI's other grant programs. The program is handled at the 
discretion of the SJI Board of Directors and staff outside the normal 
grant application process (i.e., SJI will initiate the project) and 
there is no cash match requirement.

F. Education Support Program (ESP) for Judges and Court Managers

    The new Education Support Program (ESP), formally the Scholarship 
Program, is intended to enhance the skills, knowledge, and abilities of 
state court judges and court managers by enabling them to attend out-
of-state, or to enroll in online, educational and training programs 
sponsored by national and state providers that they could not otherwise 
attend or take online because of limited state, local, and personal 
budgets. An ESP award only covers the cost of tuition up to a maximum 
of $1,000 per award. ESP application procedures can be found in section 
IV.D.

IV. Grant Applications

A. Project Grants

    An application for a Project Grant must include an application 
form; budget forms (with appropriate documentation); a project abstract 
and program narrative; a disclosure of

[[Page 62570]]

lobbying form, when applicable; and certain certifications and 
assurances (see below). See Appendix B for the Project Grant 
application forms.
1. Forms
a. Application Form (Form A)
    The application form requests basic information regarding the 
proposed project, the applicant, and the total amount of funding 
requested from SJI. It also requires the signature of an individual 
authorized to certify on behalf of the applicant that the information 
contained in the application is true and complete; that submission of 
the application has been authorized by the applicant; and that if 
funding for the proposed project is approved, the applicant will comply 
with the requirements and conditions of the award, including the 
assurances set forth in Form D.
b. Certificate of State Approval (Form B)
    An application from a state or local court must include a copy of 
Form B signed by the state's chief justice or state court 
administrator. The signature denotes that the proposed project has been 
approved by the state's highest court or the agency or council it has 
designated. It denotes further that, if applicable, a cash match 
reduction has been requested, and that if SJI approves funding for the 
project, the court or the specified designee will receive, administer, 
and be accountable for the awarded funds.
c. Budget Form (Form C)
    Applicants must submit a Form C. In addition, applicants must 
provide a detailed budget narrative providing an explanation of the 
basis for the estimates in each budget category (see subsection A.4. 
below).
    If funds from other sources are required to conduct the project, 
either as match or to support other aspects of the project, the source, 
current status of the request, and anticipated decision date must be 
provided.
d. Assurances (Form D)
    This form lists the statutory, regulatory, and policy requirements 
with which recipients of Institute funds must comply.
e. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
    Applicants other than units of state or local government are 
required to disclose whether they, or another entity that is part of 
the same organization as the applicant, have advocated a position 
before Congress on any issue, and to identify the specific subjects of 
their lobbying efforts (see section VI.A.7.).
2. Project Abstract
    The abstract should highlight the purposes, goals, methods, and 
anticipated benefits of the proposed project. It should not exceed 1 
single-spaced page on 8\1/2\ by 11 inch paper.
3. Program Narrative
    The program narrative for an application may not exceed 25 double-
spaced pages on 8\1/2\ by 11 inch paper. Margins must be at least 1 
inch, and type size must be at least 12-point and 12 cpi. The pages 
should be numbered. This page limit does not include the forms, the 
abstract, the budget narrative, and any appendices containing resumes 
and letters of cooperation or endorsement. Additional background 
material should be attached only if it is essential to impart a clear 
understanding of the proposed project. Numerous and lengthy appendices 
are strongly discouraged.
    The program narrative should address the following topics:
a. Project Objectives
    The applicant should include a clear, concise statement of what the 
proposed project is intended to accomplish. In stating the objectives 
of the project, applicants should focus on the overall programmatic 
objective (e.g., to enhance understanding and skills regarding a 
specific subject, or to determine how a certain procedure affects the 
court and litigants) rather than on operational objectives (e.g., 
provide training for 32 judges and court managers, or review data from 
300 cases).
b. Need for the Project
    If the project is to be conducted in any specific location(s), the 
applicant should discuss the particular needs of the project site(s) to 
be addressed by the project and why those needs are not being met 
through the use of existing programs, procedures, services, or other 
resources.
    If the project is not site-specific, the applicant should discuss 
the problems that the proposed project would address, and why existing 
programs, procedures, services, or other resources cannot adequately 
resolve those problems. The discussion should include specific 
references to the relevant literature and to the experience in the 
field.
c. Tasks, Methods and Evaluations
    (1) Tasks and Methods. The applicant should delineate the tasks to 
be performed in achieving the project objectives and the methods to be 
used for accomplishing each task. For example:
    (a) For research and evaluation projects, the applicant should 
include the data sources, data collection strategies, variables to be 
examined, and analytic procedures to be used for conducting the 
research or evaluation and ensuring the validity and general 
applicability of the results. For projects involving human subjects, 
the discussion of methods should address the procedures for obtaining 
respondents' informed consent, ensuring the respondents' privacy and 
freedom from risk or harm, and protecting others who are not the 
subjects of research but would be affected by the research. If the 
potential exists for risk or harm to human subjects, a discussion 
should be included that explains the value of the proposed research and 
the methods to be used to minimize or eliminate such risk.
    (b) For education and training projects, the applicant should 
include the adult education techniques to be used in designing and 
presenting the program, including the teaching/learning objectives of 
the educational design, the teaching methods to be used, and the 
opportunities for structured interaction among the participants; how 
faculty would be recruited, selected, and trained; the proposed number 
and length of the conferences, courses, seminars, or workshops to be 
conducted and the estimated number of persons who would attend them; 
the materials to be provided and how they would be developed; and the 
cost to participants.
    (c) For demonstration projects, the applicant should include the 
demonstration sites and the reasons they were selected, or if the sites 
have not been chosen, how they would be identified and their 
cooperation obtained; and how the program or procedures would be 
implemented and monitored.
    (d) For technical assistance projects, the applicant should explain 
the types of assistance that would be provided; the particular issues 
and problems for which assistance would be provided; the type of 
assistance determined; how suitable providers would be selected and 
briefed; and how reports would be reviewed.
    (2) Evaluation. Projects should include an evaluation plan to 
determine whether the project met its objectives. The evaluation should 
be designed to provide an objective and independent assessment of the 
effectiveness or usefulness of the training or services provided; the 
impact of the procedures, technology, or services tested; or the 
validity and applicability of the research conducted. The evaluation 
plan should

[[Page 62571]]

be appropriate to the type of project proposed.
d. Project Management
    The applicant should present a detailed management plan, including 
the starting and completion date for each task; the time commitments to 
the project of key staff and their responsibilities regarding each 
project task; and the procedures that would ensure that all tasks are 
performed on time, within budget, and at the highest level of quality. 
In preparing the project time line, Gantt Chart, or schedule, 
applicants should make certain that all project activities, including 
publication or reproduction of project products and their initial 
dissemination, would occur within the proposed project period. The 
management plan must also provide for the submission of Quarterly 
Progress and Financial Reports within 30 days after the close of each 
calendar quarter (i.e., no later than January 30, April 30, July 30, 
and October 30), per section VI.A.13.
    Applicants should be aware that SJI is unlikely to approve a 
limited extension of the grant period without strong justification. 
Therefore, the management plan should be as realistic as possible and 
fully reflect the time commitments of the proposed project staff and 
consultants.
e. Products
    The program narrative in the application should contain a 
description of the product(s) to be developed (e.g., training curricula 
and materials, Web sites or other electronic multimedia, articles, 
guidelines, manuals, reports, handbooks, benchbooks, or books), 
including when they would be submitted to SJI. The budget should 
include the cost of producing and disseminating the product to the 
state chief justice, state court administrator, and other appropriate 
judges or court personnel. If final products involve electronic 
formats, the applicant should indicate how the product would be made 
available to other courts. Discussion of this dissemination process 
should occur between the grantee and SJI prior to the final selection 
of the dissemination process to be used.
    (1) Dissemination Plan. The application must explain how and to 
whom the products would be disseminated; describe how they would 
benefit the state courts, including how they could be used by judges 
and court personnel; identify development, production, and 
dissemination costs covered by the project budget; and present the 
basis on which products and services developed or provided under the 
grant would be offered to the court community and the public at large 
(i.e., whether products would be distributed at no cost to recipients, 
or if costs are involved, the reason for charging recipients and the 
estimated price of the product) (see section VI.A.11.b.). Ordinarily, 
applicants should schedule all product preparation and distribution 
activities within the project period.
    Applicants proposing to develop Web-based products should provide 
for sending a notice and description of the document to the appropriate 
audiences to alert them to the availability of the Web site or 
electronic product (i.e., a written report with a reference to the Web 
site).
    Three (3) copies of all project products should be submitted to 
SJI, along with an electronic version in HTML or PDF format. 
Discussions of final product dissemination should be conducted with SJI 
prior to the end of the grant period.
    (2) Types of Products. The type of product to be prepared depends 
on the nature of the project. For example, in most instances, the 
products of a research, evaluation, or demonstration project should 
include an article summarizing the project findings that is publishable 
in a journal serving the courts community nationally, an executive 
summary that would be disseminated to the project's primary audience, 
or both. Applicants proposing to conduct empirical research or 
evaluation projects with national import should describe how they would 
make their data available for secondary analysis after the grant period 
(see section VI.A.14.a.).
    The curricula and other products developed through education and 
training projects should be designed for use by others and again by the 
original participants in the course of their duties.
    (3) SJI Review. Applicants must submit a final draft of all written 
grant products to SJI for review and approval at least 30 days before 
the products are submitted for publication or reproduction. For 
products in Web site or multimedia format, applicants must provide for 
SJI review of the product at the treatment, script, rough-cut, and 
final stages of development, or their equivalents. No grant funds may 
be obligated for publication or reproduction of a final grant product 
without the written approval of SJI (see section VI.A.11.f.).
    (4) Acknowledgment, Disclaimer, and Logo. Applicants must also 
include in all project products a prominent acknowledgment that support 
was received from SJI and a disclaimer paragraph based on the example 
provided in section VI.A.11.a.2. in the Grant Guideline. The ``SJI'' 
logo must appear on the front cover of a written product, or in the 
opening frames of a Web site or other multimedia product, unless SJI 
approves another placement. The SJI logo can be downloaded from SJI's 
Web site: https://www.sji.gov.
f. Applicant Status
    An applicant that is not a state or local court and has not 
received a grant from SJI within the past three years should indicate 
whether it is either a national non-profit organization controlled by, 
operating in conjunction with, and serving the judicial branches of 
state governments, or a national non-profit organization for the 
education and training of state court judges and support personnel (see 
section II). If the applicant is a non-judicial unit of federal, state, 
or local government, it must explain whether the proposed services 
could be adequately provided by non-governmental entities.
g. Staff Capability
    The applicant should include a summary of the training and 
experience of the key staff members and consultants that qualify them 
for conducting and managing the proposed project. Resumes of identified 
staff should be attached to the application. If one or more key staff 
members and consultants are not known at the time of the application, a 
description of the criteria that would be used to select persons for 
these positions should be included. The applicant also should identify 
the person who would be responsible for managing and reporting on the 
financial aspects of the proposed project.
h. Organizational Capacity
    Applicants that have not received a grant from SJI within the past 
three years should include a statement describing their capacity to 
administer grant funds, including the financial systems used to monitor 
project expenditures (and income, if any), and a summary of their past 
experience in administering grants, as well as any resources or 
capabilities that they have that would particularly assist in the 
successful completion of the project.
    Unless requested otherwise, an applicant that has received a grant 
from SJI within the past three years should describe only the changes 
in its organizational capacity, tax status, or financial capability 
that may affect its capacity to administer a grant.
    If the applicant is a non-profit organization (other than a 
university), it

[[Page 62572]]

must also provide documentation of its 501(c) tax-exempt status as 
determined by the Internal Revenue Service and a copy of a current 
certified audit report. For purposes of this requirement, ``current'' 
means no earlier than two years prior to the present calendar year.
    If a current audit report is not available, SJI will require the 
organization to complete a financial capability questionnaire, which 
must be signed by a certified public accountant. Other applicants may 
be required to provide a current audit report, a financial capability 
questionnaire, or both, if specifically requested to do so by the 
Institute.
i. Statement of Lobbying Activities
    Non-governmental applicants must submit SJI's Disclosure of 
Lobbying Activities Form, which documents whether they, or another 
entity that is a part of the same organization as the applicant, have 
advocated a position before Congress on any issue, and identifies the 
specific subjects of their lobbying efforts (see Appendix A).
j. Letters of Cooperation or Support
    If the cooperation of courts, organizations, agencies, or 
individuals other than the applicant is required to conduct the 
project, the applicant should attach written assurances of cooperation 
and availability to the application, or send them under separate cover. 
Letters of general support for a project are also encouraged.
4. Budget Narrative
    In addition to Project Grant applications, the following section 
also applies to Technical Assistance and Curriculum Adaptation and 
Training grant applications.
    The budget narrative should provide the basis for the computation 
of all project-related costs. When the proposed project would be 
partially supported by grants from other funding sources, applicants 
should make clear what costs would be covered by those other grants. 
Additional background information or schedules may be attached if they 
are essential to obtaining a clear understanding of the proposed 
budget. Numerous and lengthy appendices are strongly discouraged.
    The budget narrative should cover the costs of all components of 
the project and clearly identify costs attributable to the project 
evaluation. Under OMB grant guidelines incorporated by reference in 
this Grant Guideline, grant funds may not be used to purchase alcoholic 
beverages.
a. Justification of Personnel Compensation
    The applicant should set forth the percentages of time to be 
devoted by the individuals who would staff the proposed project, the 
annual salary of each of those persons, and the number of work days per 
year used for calculating the percentages of time or daily rates of 
those individuals. The applicant should explain any deviations from 
current rates or established written organizational policies. No grant 
funds or cash match may be used to pay the salary and related costs for 
a current or new employee of a court or other unit of government 
because such funds would constitute a supplantation of state or local 
funds in violation of 42 U.S.C. 10706(d)(1); this includes new 
employees hired specifically for the project. The salary and any 
related costs for a current or new employee of a court or other unit of 
government may only be accepted as in-kind match.
b. Fringe Benefit Computation
    For non-governmental entities, the applicant should provide a 
description of the fringe benefits provided to employees. If 
percentages are used, the authority for such use should be presented, 
as well as a description of the elements included in the determination 
of the percentage rate.
c. Consultant/Contractual Services and Honoraria
    The applicant should describe the tasks each consultant would 
perform, the estimated total amount to be paid to each consultant, the 
basis for compensation rates (e.g., the number of days multiplied by 
the daily consultant rates), and the method for selection. Rates for 
consultant services must be set in accordance with section VII.I.2.c. 
Prior written SJI approval is required for any consultant rate in 
excess of $800 per day; SJI funds may not be used to pay a consultant 
more than $1,100 per day. Honorarium payments must be justified in the 
same manner as consultant payments.
d. Travel
    Transportation costs and per diem rates must comply with the 
policies of the applicant organization. If the applicant does not have 
an established travel policy, then travel rates must be consistent with 
those established by the Federal government. The budget narrative 
should include an explanation of the rate used, including the 
components of the per diem rate and the basis for the estimated 
transportation expenses. The purpose of the travel should also be 
included in the narrative.
e. Equipment
    Grant funds may be used to purchase only the equipment necessary to 
demonstrate a new technological application in a court or that is 
otherwise essential to accomplishing the objectives of the project. In 
other words, grant funds cannot be used strictly for the purpose of 
purchasing equipment. Equipment purchases to support basic court 
operations ordinarily will not be approved. The applicant should 
describe the equipment to be purchased or leased and explain why the 
acquisition of that equipment is essential to accomplish the project's 
goals and objectives. The narrative should clearly identify which 
equipment is to be leased and which is to be purchased. The method of 
procurement should also be described. Purchases of automated data 
processing equipment must comply with section VII.I.2.b.
f. Supplies
    The applicant should provide a general description of the supplies 
necessary to accomplish the goals and objectives of the grant. In 
addition, the applicant should provide the basis for the amount 
requested for this expenditure category.
g. Construction
    Construction expenses are prohibited except for the limited 
purposes set forth in section VI.A.16.b. Any allowable construction or 
renovation expense should be described in detail in the budget 
narrative.
h. Telephone
    Applicants should include anticipated telephone charges, 
distinguishing between monthly charges and long distance charges in the 
budget narrative. Also, applicants should provide the basis used to 
calculate the monthly and long distance estimates.
i. Postage
    Anticipated postage costs for project-related mailings, including 
distribution of the final product(s), should be described in the budget 
narrative. The cost of special mailings, such as for a survey or for 
announcing a workshop, should be distinguished from routine operational 
mailing costs. The bases for all postage estimates should be included 
in the budget narrative.
j. Printing/Photocopying
    Anticipated costs for printing or photocopying project documents, 
reports, and publications should be included in the budget narrative, 
along

[[Page 62573]]

with the bases used to calculate these estimates.
k. Indirect Costs
    Indirect costs are only applicable to organizations that are not 
state courts or government agencies. Recoverable indirect costs are 
limited to no more than 75 percent of a grantee's direct personnel 
costs, i.e. salaries plus fringe benefits (see section VII.I.4.).
    Applicants should describe the indirect cost rates applicable to 
the grant in detail. If costs often included within an indirect cost 
rate are charged directly (e.g., a percentage of the time of senior 
managers to supervise project activities), the applicant should specify 
that these costs are not included within its approved indirect cost 
rate. These rates must be established in accordance with section 
VII.I.4. If the applicant has an indirect cost rate or allocation plan 
approved by any federal granting agency, a copy of the approved rate 
agreement must be attached to the application.
5. Submission Requirements
    a. Every applicant must submit an original and three copies of the 
application package consisting of Form A; Form B, if the application is 
from a state or local court, or a Disclosure of Lobbying Form (Form E), 
if the applicant is not a unit of state or local government; Form C; 
the Application Abstract; the Program Narrative; the Budget Narrative; 
and any necessary appendices.
    Letters of application may be submitted at any time. However, 
applicants are encouraged to review the grant deadlines available on 
the SJI Web site. Receipt of each application will be acknowledged by 
letter or e-mail.
    b. Applicants submitting more than one application may include 
material that would be identical in each application in a cover letter. 
This material will be incorporated by reference into each application 
and counted against the 25-page limit for the program narrative. A copy 
of the cover letter should be attached to each copy of the application.

B. Technical Assistance (TA) Grants

1. Application Procedures
    Applicants for TA Grants may submit an original and three copies of 
a detailed letter describing the proposed project, as well as a Form A, 
``State Justice Institute Application'' (see Appendix B) and Form B, 
Certificate of State Approval from the State Supreme Court, or its 
designated agency and Form C, ``Project Budget in Tabular Format.'' 
Letters from regional court associations must be signed by the 
president of the association.
2. Application Format
    Although there is no prescribed form for the letter, or a minimum 
or maximum page limit, letters of application should include the 
following information:
    a. Need for Funding. What is the critical need facing the 
applicant? How would the proposed technical assistance help the 
applicant meet this critical need? Why are state or local resources not 
sufficient to fully support the costs of the required consultant 
services?
    b. Project Description. What tasks would the consultant be expected 
to perform, and how would they be accomplished? Which organization or 
individual would be hired to provide the assistance, and how was this 
consultant selected? If a consultant has not yet been identified, what 
procedures and criteria would be used to select the consultant 
(applicants are expected to follow their jurisdictions' normal 
procedures for procuring consultant services)? What specific tasks 
would the consultant(s) and court staff undertake? What is the schedule 
for completion of each required task and the entire project? How would 
the applicant oversee the project and provide guidance to the 
consultant, and who at the court or regional court association would be 
responsible for coordinating all project tasks and submitting quarterly 
progress and financial status reports?
    If the consultant has been identified, the applicant should provide 
a letter from that individual or organization documenting interest in 
and availability for the project, as well as the consultant's ability 
to complete the assignment within the proposed time frame and for the 
proposed cost. The consultant must agree to submit a detailed written 
report to the court and SJI upon completion of the technical 
assistance.
    c. Likelihood of Implementation. What steps have been or would be 
taken to facilitate implementation of the consultant's recommendations 
upon completion of the technical assistance? For example, if the 
support or cooperation of specific court officials or committees, other 
agencies, funding bodies, organizations, or a court other than the 
applicant would be needed to adopt the changes recommended by the 
consultant and approved by the court, how would they be involved in the 
review of the recommendations and development of the implementation 
plan?
3. Budget and Matching State Contribution
    Applicants must follow the same guidelines provided under Section 
IV.A.4. A completed Form C ``Project Budget, Tabular Format'' and 
budget narrative must be included with the letter requesting technical 
assistance.
    The budget narrative should provide the basis for all project-
related costs, including the basis for determining the estimated 
consultant costs, if compensation of the consultant is required (e.g., 
the number of days per task times the requested daily consultant rate). 
Applicants should be aware that consultant rates above $800 per day 
must be approved in advance by SJI, and that no consultant will be paid 
more than $1,100 per day from SJI funds. In addition, the budget should 
provide for submission of two copies of the consultant's final report 
to the SJI.
    Recipients of TA Grants do not have to submit an audit report but 
must maintain appropriate documentation to support expenditures (see 
section VI.A.3.).
4. Submission Requirements
    Letters of application should be submitted according to the grant 
deadlines provided on the SJI Web site.
    If the support or cooperation of agencies, funding bodies, 
organizations, or courts other than the applicant would be needed in 
order for the consultant to perform the required tasks, written 
assurances of such support or cooperation should accompany the 
application letter. Letters of general support for the project are also 
encouraged. Support letters also may be submitted under separate cover; 
however, to ensure that there is sufficient time to bring them to the 
attention of the Institute's Board of Directors, letters sent under 
separate cover should be received by the same date as the technical 
assistance request being supported.

C. Curriculum Adaptation and Training (CAT) Grants

1. Application Procedures
    In lieu of formal applications, applicants should submit an 
original and three photocopies of a detailed letter as well as a Form 
A, ``State Justice Institute Application;'' Form B, ``Certificate of 
State Approval;'' and Form C, ``Project Budget, Tabular Format'' (see 
Appendices).
2. Application Format
    Although there is no prescribed format for the letter, or a minimum 
or maximum page limit, letters of

[[Page 62574]]

application should include the following information.
    a. For adaptation of a curriculum:
    (1) Project Description. What is the title of the model curriculum 
to be adapted and who originally developed it? Why is this education 
program needed at the present time? What are the project's goals? What 
are the learning objectives of the adapted curriculum? What program 
components would be implemented, and what types of modifications, if 
any, are anticipated in length, format, learning objectives, teaching 
methods, or content? Who would be responsible for adapting the model 
curriculum? Who would the participants be, how many would there be, how 
would they be recruited, and from where would they come (e.g., from a 
single local jurisdiction, from across the state, from a multi-state 
region, from across the nation)?
    (2) Need for Funding. Why are sufficient state or local resources 
unavailable to fully support the modification and presentation of the 
model curriculum? What is the potential for replicating or integrating 
the adapted curriculum in the future using state or local funds, once 
it has been successfully adapted and tested?
    (3) Likelihood of Implementation. What is the proposed timeline, 
including the project start and end dates? On what date(s) would the 
judicial branch education program be presented? What process would be 
used to modify and present the program? Who would serve as faculty, and 
how were they selected? What measures would be taken to facilitate 
subsequent presentations of the program? Ordinarily, an independent 
evaluation of a curriculum adaptation project is not required; however, 
the results of any evaluation should be included in the final report.
    (4) Expressions of Interest by Judges and/or Court Personnel. Does 
the proposed program have the support of the court system or 
association leadership, and of judges, court managers, and judicial 
branch education personnel who are expected to attend? Applicants may 
demonstrate this by attaching letters of support.
    b. For training assistance:
    (1) Need for Funding. What is the court reform or initiative 
prompting the need for training? How would the proposed training help 
the applicant implement planned changes at the court? Why are state or 
local resources not sufficient to fully support the costs of the 
required training?
    (2) Project Description. What tasks would the trainer(s) be 
expected to perform? Which organization or individual would be hired, 
if in-house personnel are not the trainers, to provide the training, 
and how was the trainer selected? If a trainer has not yet been 
identified, what procedures and criteria would be used to select the 
trainer? What specific tasks would the trainer and court staff or 
regional court association members undertake? What presentation methods 
will be used? What is the schedule for completion of each required task 
and the entire project? How will the applicant oversee the project and 
provide guidance to the trainer, and who at the court or affiliated 
with the regional court association would be responsible for 
coordinating all project tasks and submitting quarterly progress and 
financial status reports?
    If the trainer has been identified, the applicant should provide a 
letter from that individual or organization documenting interest in and 
availability for the project, as well as the trainer's ability to 
complete the assignment within the proposed time frame and for the 
proposed cost.
    (3) Likelihood of Implementation. What steps have been or will be 
taken to coordinate the implementation of the new reform, initiative, 
and the training to support the same? For example, if the support or 
cooperation of specific court or regional court association officials 
or committees, other agencies, funding bodies, organizations, or a 
court other than the applicant would be needed to adopt the reform and 
initiate the training proposed, how would they be involved in the 
review of the recommendations and development of the implementation 
plan?
3. Budget and Matching State Contribution
    Applicants must also follow the same guidelines provided under 
Section IV.A.4. Applicants should attach a copy of budget Form C and a 
budget narrative (see subsection A.4. above) that describes the basis 
for the computation of all project-related costs and the source of the 
match offered.
4. Submission Requirements
    For curriculum adaptation requests, applicants should allow at 
least 90 days between the Board meeting and the date of the proposed 
program to allow sufficient time for needed planning. Letters of 
support for the project are also encouraged. Applicants are encouraged 
to call SJI to discuss concerns about timing of submissions.

D. Partner Grants

    SJI and its funding partners may meld, pick and choose, or waive 
their application procedures, grant cycles, or grant requirements to 
expedite the award of jointly-funded grants targeted at emerging or 
high priority problems confronting state and local courts. SJI may 
solicit brief proposals from potential grantees to fellow financial 
partners as a first step. Should SJI be chosen as the lead grant 
manager, Project Grant application procedures will apply to the 
proposed Partner Grant. As with Project Grants, Partner Grants will be 
targeted at initiatives likely to have a significant national impact.

E. Education Support Program (ESP)

1. Limitations
    Applicants may not receive more than one ESP award in a two-year 
period unless the course specifically assumes multi-year participation, 
or the course is part of a graduate degree program in judicial studies 
in which the applicant is currently enrolled (neither exception should 
be taken as a commitment on the part of SJI's Board of Directors to 
approve serial ESP awards). Attendance at annual or mid-year meetings 
or conferences of a state or national organization does not qualify as 
an out-of-state educational program for the ESP, even though it may 
include workshops or other training sessions.
    The ESP only covers the cost of tuition up to a maximum of $1,000 
per award. Awards will be made for the exact amount requested for 
tuition. Funds to pay tuition in excess of $1,000, and other cost of 
attending the program such as travel, lodging, transportation, meals, 
materials, transportation to and from airports (including rental cars) 
must be obtained from other sources or borne by the ESP award 
recipient. Applicants are encouraged to check other sources of 
financial assistance and to combine aid from various sources whenever 
possible. An ESP award is not transferable to another individual. It 
may be used only for the course specified in the application unless the 
applicant's request to attend a different course that meets the 
eligibility requirements is approved in writing by SJI.
2. Eligibility Requirements
    a. Recipients. Because of the limited amount of funding available, 
only full-time judges of state or local trial and appellate courts; 
full-time professional, state, or local court personnel with management 
and supervisory responsibilities; and supervisory and management 
probation personnel in judicial branch probation offices are eligible 
for the program. Senior judges,

[[Page 62575]]

part-time judges, quasi-judicial hearing officers including referees 
and commissioners, administrative law judges, staff attorneys, law 
clerks, line staff, law enforcement officers, and other executive 
branch personnel are not eligible.
    b. Courses. An ESP award is only for: (1) A course presented in a 
state other than the one in which the applicant resides or works, or 
(2) an online course. The course must be designed to enhance the skills 
of new or experienced judges and court managers; or be offered by a 
recognized graduate program for judges or court managers.
    Applicants are encouraged not to wait for the decision on an ESP 
applicaiton to register for an educational program they wish to attend. 
SJI does not submit the names of ESP award recipients to educational 
organizations, nor provide the funds to the educational organization. 
ESP funds are provided as reimbursements directly to the recipient.
3. Forms
    a. Education Support Program Application--Form ESP-1 (Appendix B). 
The application requests basic information about the applicant and the 
educational program the applicant would like to attend. It also 
addresses the applicant's commitment to share the skills and knowledge 
gained with state and local court colleagues. The application must bear 
the original signature of the applicant. Faxed or photocopied 
signatures will not be accepted. Please be sure to indicate whether the 
state will be providing funds for the project and, if so, how much. SJI 
will not supplant state funds with these awards.
    b. Education Support Program Concurrence--Form ESP-2 (Appendix B). 
Judges and court managers applying for the program must submit the 
original written concurrence of the chief justice of the state's 
supreme court (or the chief justice's designee) on Form ESP-2 (see 
Appendix B). The signature of the presiding judge of the applicant's 
court may not be substituted for that of the state's chief justice or 
the chief justice's designee. The chief justice or state court 
administrator must notify SJI of the designees within the state for ESP 
purposes.
4. Submission Requirements
    Applications may be submitted at any time but will be reviewed on a 
quarterly basis. This means ESP awards will be on a ``first-come, 
first-considered'' basis. The dates for applications to be received by 
SJI for consideration in FY 2011 are November 1, February 1, May 1, and 
August 1. These are not mailing deadlines. The applications must be 
received by SJI on or before each of these dates. No exceptions or 
extensions will be granted. All the required items must be received for 
an application to be considered. If the Concurrence form or letter of 
support is sent separately from the application, the postmark date of 
the last item sent will be used in determining the review date. All 
applications should be sent by mail or courier (not fax or e-mail).

V. Application Review Procedures

A. Preliminary Inquiries

    SJI staff will answer inquiries concerning application procedures.

B. Selection Criteria

1. Project Grant Applications
    a. Project Grant applications will be rated on the basis of the 
criteria set forth below. SJI will accord the greatest weight to the 
following criteria:
    (1) The soundness of the methodology;
    (2) The demonstration of need for the project;
    (3) The appropriateness of the proposed evaluation design;
    (4) If applicable, the key findings and recommendations of the most 
recent evaluation and the proposed responses to those findings and 
recommendations;
    (5) The applicant's management plan and organizational 
capabilities;
    (6) The qualifications of the project's staff;
    (7) The products and benefits resulting from the project, including 
the extent to which the project will have long-term benefits for state 
courts across the nation;
    (8) The degree to which the findings, procedures, training, 
technology, or other results of the project can be transferred to other 
jurisdictions;
    (9) The reasonableness of the proposed budget; and,
    (10) The demonstration of cooperation and support of other agencies 
that may be affected by the project.
    b. In determining which projects to support, SJI will also consider 
whether the applicant is a state court, a national court support or 
education organization, a non-court unit of government, or other type 
of entity eligible to receive grants under SJI's enabling legislation 
(see section II.); the availability of financial assistance from other 
sources for the project; the amount of the applicant's match; the 
extent to which the proposed project would also benefit the Federal 
courts or help State courts enforce federal constitutional and 
legislative requirements; and the level of appropriations available to 
SJI in the current year and the amount expected to be available in 
succeeding fiscal years.
2. Technical Assistance (TA) Grant Applications
    TA Grant applications will be rated on the basis of the following 
criteria:
    a. Whether the assistance would address a critical need of the 
applicant;
    b. The soundness of the technical assistance approach to the 
problem;
    c. The qualifications of the consultant(s) to be hired or the 
specific criteria that will be used to select the consultant(s);
    d. The commitment of the court or association to act on the 
consultant's recommendations; and,
    e. The reasonableness of the proposed budget.
    SJI also will consider factors such as the level and nature of the 
match that would be provided, diversity of subject matter, geographic 
diversity, the level of appropriations available to SJI in the current 
year, and the amount expected to be available in succeeding fiscal 
years.
3. Curriculum Adaptation and Training (CAT) Grant Applications
    CAT Grant applications will be rated on the basis of the following 
criteria:
    a. For curriculum adaptation projects:
    (1) The goals and objectives of the proposed project;
    (2) The need for outside funding to support the program;
    (3) The appropriateness of the approach in achieving the project's 
educational objectives;
    (4) The likelihood of effective implementation and integration of 
the modified curriculum into ongoing educational programming; and,
    (5) Expressions of interest by the judges and/or court personnel 
who would be directly involved in or affected by the project.
    b. For training assistance:
    (1) Whether the training would address a critical need of the court 
or association;
    (2) The soundness of the training approach to the problem;
    (3) The qualifications of the trainer(s) to be hired or the 
specific criteria that will be used to select the trainer(s);
    (4) The commitment of the court or association to the training 
program; and
    (5) The reasonableness of the proposed budget.
    SJI will also consider factors such as the reasonableness of the 
amount requested; compliance with match requirements; diversity of 
subject matter, geographic diversity; the level of appropriations 
available in the current

[[Page 62576]]

year; and the amount expected to be available in succeeding fiscal 
years.
4. Partner Grants
    The selection criteria for Partner Grants will be driven by the 
collective priorities of SJI and other organizations and their 
collective assessments regarding the needs and capabilities of court 
and court-related organizations. Having settled on priorities, SJI and 
its financial partners will likely contact the courts or court-related 
organizations most acceptable as pilots, laboratories, consultants, or 
the like.
5. Education Support Program (ESP)
    ESP awards are only for programs that either: (1) Enhance the 
skills of judges and court managers; or (2) are part of a graduate 
degree program for judges or court personnel. Awards are provided on 
the basis of:
    a. The date on which the application and concurrence (and support 
letter, if required) were sent (``first-come, first-considered'');
    b. The unavailability of state or local funds, or funding from 
another source to cover the costs of attending the program, or 
participating online;
    c. The absence of educational programs in the applicant's state 
addressing the topic(s) covered by the educational program for which 
the award is being sought;
    d. Geographic balance among the recipients;
    e. The balance of ESP awards among educational providers and 
programs;
    f. The balance of ESP awards among the types of courts and court 
personnel (trial judge, appellate judge, trial court administrator) 
represented; and
    g. The level of appropriations available to SJI in the current year 
and the amount expected to be available in succeeding fiscal years.
    The postmark or courier receipt will be used to determine the date 
on which the application form and other required items were sent.

C. Review and Approval Process

1. Project Grant Applications
    SJI's Board of Directors will review the applications 
competitively. SJI staff will prepare a narrative summary and a rating 
sheet assigning points for each relevant selection criterion. Staff 
will present the narrative summaries and rating sheets to the Board for 
its review. The Board will review all application summaries and decide 
which projects it will fund. The decision to fund a project is solely 
that of the Board of Directors.
    The Chairman of the Board will sign approved awards on behalf of 
SJI.
2. Technical Assistance (TA) and Curriculum Adaptation and Training 
(CAT) Grant Applications
    Staff will prepare a narrative summary of each application and a 
rating sheet assigning points for each relevant selection criterion. 
The Board will review the applications competitively.
    The Chairman of the Board will sign approved awards on behalf of 
SJI.
3. Education Support Program (ESP)
    A committee of the Board of Directors will review ESP applications 
quarterly. The Board of Directors has delegated its authority to 
approve ESP awards to the committee established for the program. The 
committee will review the applications competitively. In the event of a 
tie vote, the Chairman of the Board will serve as the tie-breaker. The 
Chairman of the Board will sign approved awards on behalf of SJI.
4. Partner Grants
    SJI's internal process for the review and approval of Partner 
Grants will depend on negotiations with fellow financiers. SJI may use 
its procedures, a partner's procedures, a mix of both, or entirely 
unique procedures. All Partner Grants will be approved by the Board of 
Directors on whatever schedule makes sense at the time.

D. Return Policy

    Unless a specific request is made, unsuccessful applications will 
not be returned. Applicants are advised that SJI records are subject to 
the provisions of the Federal Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552.

E. Notification of Board Decision

    SJI will send written notice to applicants concerning all Board 
decisions to approve, defer, or deny their respective applications. For 
all applications (except ESP applications), if requested, SJI will 
convey the key issues and questions that arose during the review 
process. A decision by the Board to deny an application may not be 
appealed, but it does not prohibit resubmission of a proposal based on 
that application in a subsequent funding cycle.

F. Response to Notification of Approval

    With the exception of those approved for ESP awards, applicants 
have 30 days from the date of the letter notifying them that the Board 
has approved their application to respond to any revisions requested by 
the Board. If the requested revisions (or a reasonable schedule for 
submitting such revisions) have not been submitted to SJI within 30 
days after notification, the approval may be rescinded and the 
application presented to the Board for reconsideration. In the event an 
issue will only be resolved after award, such as the selection of a 
consultant, the final award document will include a Special Condition 
that will require additional grantee reporting and SJI review and 
approval. Special Conditions, in the form of incentives or sanctions, 
may also be used in other situations.

VI. Compliance Requirements

    The State Justice Institute Act contains limitations and conditions 
on grants, contracts, and cooperative agreements awarded by SJI. The 
Board of Directors has approved additional policies governing the use 
of SJI grant funds. These statutory and policy requirements are set 
forth below.

A. Recipients of Project Grants

1. Advocacy
    No funds made available by SJI may be used to support or conduct 
training programs for the purpose of advocating particular non-judicial 
public policies or encouraging non-judicial political activities (42 
U.S.C. 10706(b)).
2. Approval of Key Staff
    If the qualifications of an employee or consultant assigned to a 
key project staff position are not described in the application or if 
there is a change of a person assigned to such a position, the 
recipient must submit a description of the qualifications of the newly 
assigned person to SJI. Prior written approval of the qualifications of 
the new person assigned to a key staff position must be received from 
the Institute before the salary or consulting fee of that person and 
associated costs may be paid or reimbursed from grant funds (see 
section VIII.A.7.).
3. Audit
    Recipients of project grants must provide for an annual fiscal 
audit which includes an opinion on whether the financial statements of 
the grantee present fairly its financial position and its financial 
operations are in accordance with generally accepted accounting 
principles (see section VII.K. for the requirements of such audits). 
ESP award recipients, Curriculum Adaptation and Training Grants, and 
Technical Assistance Grants are not required to submit an audit, but 
they must maintain appropriate documentation to support all 
expenditures (see section VIII.K.).

[[Page 62577]]

4. Budget Revisions
    Budget revisions among direct cost categories that: (a) Transfer 
grant funds to an unbudgeted cost category, or (b) individually or 
cumulatively exceed five percent of the approved original budget or the 
most recently approved revised budget require prior SJI approval (see 
section VIII.A.1.).
5. Conflict of Interest
    Personnel and o