Small Business Size and Status Integrity, 62313-62321 [2011-25656]
Download as PDF
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 195 / Friday, October 7, 2011 / Proposed Rules
of certain biological agents and toxins
by the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) (subtitle A, sections
201–204) and the Department of
Agriculture (USDA) (subtitle B, sections
211–213), and provides for interagency
coordination between the two
Departments regarding overlap agents
and toxins (subtitle C, section 221). For
the HHS, the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC) has been
designated as the agency with primary
responsibility for implementing the
provisions of the Act; the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
is the agency fulfilling that role for the
USDA. CDC and APHIS list select agents
and toxins in 42 CFR 73.3 and in 7 CFR
331.3 and 9 CFR 121.3, respectively.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s
Criminal Justice Information Service
(CJIS) conducts security risk
assessments of all individuals and
nongovernmental entities that request to
possess, use, or transfer select agents
and toxins.
The meeting announced here is an
opportunity for the regulated
community (i.e., registered entity
responsible officials, alternate
responsible officials, and entity owners)
and other interested individuals to
obtain specific regulatory guidance and
information on standards concerning
biosafety and biosecurity issues related
to the Federal Select Agent Program.
CDC, APHIS, and CJIS representatives
will be present at the meeting to address
questions and concerns.
Updates on the current status of the
APHIS and CDC proposed rule, general
components of a personnel reliability
program, pre-employment background
screening, occupational health
programs, BSL4 surety programs, and
future responsible official training will
be discussed, including panel
discussions, by representatives from the
Department of Homeland Security, CJIS,
APHIS, CDC, and National Institutes of
Health.
All attendees must register in
advance. To register all persons must
complete an online registration form at
https://www.selectagents.gov and submit
it by October 14, 2011. For those unable
to attend in person, the workshop will
be available over the Internet as a
webcast.
Parking is available at the University
Center for a $5 fee. Hotel information is
available on the Internet at https://
www.selectagents.gov.
If you require special
accommodations, such as a sign
language interpreter, please call or write
one of the individuals listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:24 Oct 06, 2011
Jkt 226001
Done in Washington, DC, this 3rd day of
October 2011.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–26071 Filed 10–6–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
9 CFR Parts 71, 77, 78, and 90
[Docket No. APHIS–2009–0091]
RIN 0579–AD24
Traceability for Livestock Moving
Interstate
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of
comment period.
AGENCY:
We are extending the
comment period for our proposed rule
that would establish minimum national
official identification and
documentation requirements for the
traceability of livestock moving
interstate. This action will allow
interested persons additional time to
prepare and submit comments.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before December
9, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/#!document
Detail;D=APHIS–2009–0091–0001.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Send your comment to Docket No.
APHIS–2009–0091, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
3A–03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
Supporting documents and any
comments we receive on this docket
may be viewed at https://www.
regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=
APHIS–2009–0091 or in our reading
room, which is located in room 1141 of
the USDA South Building, 14th Street
and Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 690–2817 before
coming.
SUMMARY:
Mr.
Neil Hammerschmidt, Program
Manager, Animal Disease Traceability,
VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 46,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
62313
Riverdale, MD 20737–1231; (301) 734–
5571.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
11, 2011, we published in the Federal
Register (76 FR 50082–50110, Docket
No. APHIS–2009–0091) a proposal to
establish minimum national official
identification and documentation
requirements for the traceability of
livestock moving interstate.
Comments on the proposed rule were
required to be received on or before
November 9, 2011. We are extending the
comment period on Docket No. APHIS–
2009–0091 for an additional 30 days.
This action will allow interested
persons additional time to prepare and
submit comments.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 8301–8317; 7 CFR
2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.
Done in Washington, DC this 3rd day of
October 2011.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–26056 Filed 10–6–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Parts 121, 124, 125, 126, 127
RIN 3245–AG23
Small Business Size and Status
Integrity
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA or Agency) is
proposing to amend its regulations to
implement provisions of the Small
Business Jobs Act of 2010 (Jobs Act)
pertaining to small business size and
status integrity. SBA is proposing to
amend its program regulations to
implement statutory provisions
establishing that there is a presumption
of loss equal to the value of the contract
or other instrument when a concern
willfully seeks and receives an award by
misrepresentation. SBA is proposing to
amend its program regulations to
implement statutory provisions that
provide that the submission of an offer
or application for an award intended for
small business concerns will be deemed
a size or status certification or
representation in certain circumstances.
SBA is proposing to amend its program
regulations to implement statutory
provisions that provide that an
authorized official must sign in
connection with a size or status
certification or representation for a
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
62314
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 195 / Friday, October 7, 2011 / Proposed Rules
contract or other instrument. SBA is
proposing to amend its regulations to
implement statutory provisions that
provide that concerns that fail to update
their size or status in the Online
Representations and Certifications
Application (ORCA) database (or any
successor thereto) at least annually shall
no longer be identified in the database
as small or some other socioeconomic
status, until the representation is
updated. Finally, SBA is proposing to
amend its regulations to clarify when
size is determined for purposes of entry
into the 8(a) Business Development and
HUBZone programs.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before November 7, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN: 3245–AG23, by any of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail, for paper, disk, or CD/ROM
submissions: Dean Koppel, U.S. Small
Business Administration, Office of
Government Contracting, 409 Third
Street, SW., 8th Floor, Washington, DC
20416.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Dean
Koppel, U.S. Small Business
Administration, Office of Government
Contracting, 409 Third Street, SW., 8th
Floor Washington, DC 20416.
SBA will post all comments on
https://www.regulations.gov. If you wish
to submit confidential business
information (CBI) as defined in the User
Notice at https://www.Regulations.gov,
please submit the information to Dean
Koppel, U.S. Small Business
Administration, Office of Government
Contracting, 409 Third Street, SW., 8th
Floor, Washington, DC 20416, or send
an e-mail to Dean.Koppel@sba.gov.
Highlight the information that you
consider to be CBI and explain why you
believe SBA should hold this
information as confidential. SBA will
review the information and make the
final determination on whether it will
publish the information or not.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dean Koppel, Office of Government
Contracting, 409 Third Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20416; (202) 205–9751;
Dean.Koppel@sba.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
September 27, 2010, Congress amended
the Small Business Act to provide that
if a concern willfully seeks and receives
an award by misrepresenting its small
business size or other socioeconomic
status, there is a presumption of loss to
the United States equal to the value of
the contract, subcontract, cooperative
agreement, cooperative research and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:24 Oct 06, 2011
Jkt 226001
development agreement or grant. The
Senate Report indicates that this
presumption is ‘‘irrefutable.’’ Senate
Rep. No. 111–343, p. 8. The
amendments also provide that certain
actions, such as submitting an offer in
response to a solicitation set aside for
small business concerns, will be
deemed a representation of small
business size or status. The amendments
require the signature of an authorized
official of a concern making a small
business size or status representation in
connection with certain actions, such as
submitting an offer. The amendments
further provide that concerns must
update their size and status
certifications in ORCA at least annually,
or the status will be lost until such time
as the update is made. Finally, the
amendments further provide that SBA
must promulgate regulations to protect
individuals and concerns from liability
in cases of unintentional errors,
technical malfunctions and other
similar situations.
In accordance with 15 U.S.C. 632(w),
SBA is proposing to amend its Size
(121.108, 121.411), 8(a) (124.521), Small
Disadvantaged Business (SDB)
(124.1015), Service-Disabled VeteranOwned (SDVO) (125.29), HUBZone
(126.900) and Women-Owned Small
Business (WOSB) (127.700) regulations
to notify firms participating in those
programs about the statutory
presumption of loss provisions; the
statutory deemed certification
provisions; the statutory signature
requirement in connection with offers;
and the statutory limitation of liability
provisions. In addition, SBA is
proposing to amend its Size, SDB,
SDVO, HUBZone and WOSB regulations
to notify firms participating in these
programs of the additional penalties for
misrepresentations set forth in 15 U.S.C.
§ 645(d). SBA is not proposing to amend
its 8(a) regulations to add this notice
because 8(a) Participants are not
mentioned in 15 U.S.C. 645(d).
In accordance with 15 U.S.C. 632(x),
SBA is also proposing to amend its
regulations to add provisions (121.109,
124.1016, 125.30, 127.701) requiring a
firm to update its size, small
disadvantaged business, servicedisabled veteran-owned or womenowned small business status
certification in federal databases at least
annually, and to require that a firm that
fails to certify its size or status within
one year of a prior certification will no
longer be listed as a firm of that size or
status, until the firm recertifies its status
in connection with the specific relevant
size standard or eligibility requirements.
SBA is not proposing to add such a
requirement for purposes of the 8(a) BD
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
or HUBZone programs, because the
Small Business Administration is
responsible for providing these
certification designations in federal
procurement databases.
SBA’s regulations currently provide
that a concern applying for certification
into the 8(a) Business Development or
HUBZone programs must be small for
its primary industry at the time of
application and ‘‘the date of certification
by SBA.’’ 13 CFR 121.404(b). If the SBA
8(a) or HUBZone program office
believes that an applicant is other than
small, the SBA program office requests
a formal size determination from the
relevant SBA Office Government
Contracting Area Office. However, SBA
will not certify a firm into these
programs if it believes the firm is other
than small. Consequently, an issue in
administrative litigation has arisen
concerning what date to use to
determine the firm’s size as of the ‘‘date
of certification’’ into the program.
Obviously, SBA does not want to certify
a firm into one of the 8(a) or HUBZone
programs in the firm is other than small
for the work for which it is primarily
engaged. Consequently, we are
proposing to amend the size regulations
to provide that for purposes of entry
into these programs, a firm must be
small at the date of application and the
date the program office requests a
formal size determination in connection
with a firm that is otherwise eligible for
program certification.
SBA is also proposing to update its
size protest regulations to add
additional methods for serving formal
size determinations. The current
regulation limits the notification
method to certified mail, return receipt
requested, or overnight delivery. In
addition, SBA is proposing to remove
the current requirement that SBA
provide the formal size determination to
all of the protested concern’s affiliates,
or alleged affiliates. A concern can have
hundreds of affiliates or alleged
affiliates, and it is impractical and
costly to provide a decision to all of
these entities.
Compliance With Executive Orders
12866, 13563, 12988, 13132, the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), and the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5. U.S.C. 601–612)
Executive Orders 12866
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has determined that this rule is
a significant regulatory action for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the next section contains
SBA’s Regulatory Impact Analysis. This
is not a major rule, however, under the
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 195 / Friday, October 7, 2011 / Proposed Rules
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 80,
et seq.
Regulatory Impact Analysis
1. Is there a need for the regulatory
action? The proposed regulations would
implement Sections 1341 and 1342 of
the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010,
Public Law 111–240, 124 Stat. 2504,
September 27, 2010 (Jobs Act) which are
codified at 15 U.S.C. 632(w), (x).
Sections 1341 and 1342 of the Jobs Act
require the Administrator to promulgate
regulations implementing some of the
provisions within one year of
enactment.
2. What are the potential benefits and
costs of this regulatory action? It is the
declared statutory policy of the United
States that small business concerns
receive their fair proportion of
government contracts, to spur creativity
and innovation, increase employment
and strengthen the industrial base.
Several recent Government
Accountability Office reports indicate
that ineligible concerns may be
receiving benefits to which they are not
entitled. This in turn harms legitimate
small business concerns that not only
do not receive the contracts, but may be
deprived of future contracting
opportunities because of the attention
garnered by these bad actors. The
presumption of loss, deemed
certification and signature requirement
will make it easier to prosecute, seek
damages or suspend or debar concerns
and individuals that willfully
misrepresent their size and
socioeconomic status in order to gain a
contract, subcontract, grant or
cooperative agreement. The rule
proposes to force concerns to update
their size or status in federal
procurement databases at least annually,
or else the firms will lose their status in
those databases. Standard contracting
and grant forms will have to be
amended to allow an authorized official
to sign on the same page as the size or
status that the firm is claiming. The
Online Certification and Representation
(ORCA) database will have to be
programmed to automatically change
the size or socioeconomic status of firms
that fail to update their size or
socioeconomic status at least annually.
SBA believes that the potential costs
associated with these changes, which
are required by statute, are relatively
minor and are significantly outweighed
by the benefits to the integrity of small
business procurement, grant and
research programs and the intended
beneficiaries.
3. What are the alternatives to this
final rule? The proposed regulations are
required to implement statutory
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:24 Oct 06, 2011
Jkt 226001
provisions. The requirements are clear,
and the Jobs Act requires promulgation
of regulations implementing certain
portions of the Jobs Act within one year.
Executive Order 13563
The proposed regulations implement
important statutory provisions intended
to prevent and deter fraud and
misrepresentation in small business
government contracting and other
programs. SBA proposes to amend all
applicable parts of its regulations to put
participants in those programs on notice
of the penalties associated with
misrepresentation, and to the extent
practicable, utilize identical language in
each Part. SBA is also proposing to
include in each part other relevant
applicable statutory provisions
concerning the penalties for
misrepresentation. The costs associated
with these proposed rules, requiring a
signature in connection with a size or
status representation and requiring
concerns to update online certifications
annually, are minimal and required by
statute. As part of its implementation of
this executive order and consistent with
its commitment to public participation
in the rulemaking process, SBA held
public meetings in 13 locations around
the country to discuss implementation
of the Jobs Act, and received public
input from thousands of small business
owners, contracting officials and large
business representatives.
Executive Order 12988
For purposes of Executive Order
12988, SBA has drafted this proposed
rule, to the extent practicable, in
accordance with the standards set forth
in section 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of that Order,
to minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden. This rule
has no preemptive or retroactive effect.
Executive Order 13132
This rule does not have federalism
implications as defined in Executive
Order 13132. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
layers of government, as specified in the
order. As such it does not warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.,
Chapter 35
For the purpose of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35,
SBA has determined that this rule, if
adopted in final form, would not impose
new reporting requirements and would
not require new recordkeeping
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
62315
requirements. In accordance with
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
§§ 4.1202, 52.204–8, 52.219–1 and 13
CFR 121.404(a), 121.411, concerns must
submit paper or electronic
representations or certifications in
connection with prime contracts and
subcontracts. The Jobs Act requires that
each offeror or applicant for a Federal
contract, subcontract, or grant shall
contain a certification concerning the
small business size and status of a
business concern seeking the Federal
contract, subcontract or grant. The Jobs
Act mandates that an authorized official
must sign the certification on the same
page containing the size and status
claimed by the concern. Offerors are
already required to sign their offers, bids
or quotes (Standard Forms 18, 30, 33,
1449), so this provision does not create
new reporting or recordkeeping
requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
SBA has determined that this
proposed rule, if adopted in final form,
may have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612.
Therefore, SBA has prepared an Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Act (IRFA)
analysis addressing the proposed
regulation.
IRFA
When preparing a Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis, an agency shall
address all of the following: a
description of why the action by the
agency is being considered; the
objectives and legal basis of the rule; the
estimated number of small entities to
which the rule may apply; a description
of the projected reporting,
recordkeeping and other compliance
requirements; identification of all
Federal rules which may duplicate,
overlap or conflict with the proposed
rule; and a description of significant
alternatives which minimize any
significant economic impact on small
entities. This IRFA considers these
points and the impact the proposed
regulation concerning small business
size and status integrity may have on
small entities.
(a) Need for, Objectives, and Legal Basis
of the Rule
The proposed regulatory amendments
implement Sections 1341 and 1342 of
the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010,
Public Law 111–240, 124 Stat. 2504,
September 27, 2010 (Jobs Act); 15 U.S.C.
632(w), (x). The purpose of the statute
and implementing regulations is to
prevent or deter firms from
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
62316
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 195 / Friday, October 7, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(c) Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping
and Other Compliance Requirements
(b) Estimate of the Number of Small
Entities to Which the Rule May Apply
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
misrepresenting their size or
socioeconomic status.
This proposed rule would not impose
a new information collection,
recordkeeping or compliance
requirement on small businesses. A
firm’s size or socioeconomic status is
generally based on records that it
already possesses, such as payroll
records and annual tax returns. Firms
currently must represent their size or
status in connection with contracts and
subcontracts, either electronically or in
paper form. FAR §§ 4.1202, 52.204–8,
52.219–1 and 13 CFR 121.404(a),
121.411. The proposed rule requires an
authorized official to sign on the page
containing a concern’s size or status
representation. Offerors are generally
required to sign their offers (e.g.,
Standard Forms 26, 33, 1447, 1449), so
the burden on small business concerns
to also sign their size or status
representation or certification will be
minimal.
The RFA directs agencies to provide
a description of and, where feasible, an
estimate of the number of entities that
may be affected by the proposed rules,
if adopted. The RFA defines ‘‘small
entity’’ to include ‘‘small businesses,’’
‘‘small organizations,’’ and ‘‘small
governmental jurisdictions.’’ SBA’s
programs do not apply to ‘‘small
organizations’’ or ‘‘small governmental
jurisdictions’’ because they are nonprofit or governmental entities and do
not generally qualify as ‘‘business
concerns’’ within the meaning of SBA’s
regulations. SBA’s programs generally
apply only to for-profit business
concerns. Therefore, the proposed
regulation will not impact small
organizations or small governmental
jurisdictions.
In fiscal year 2010, there were
approximately 3.35 million small
business contract actions. The proposed
regulations concerning presumption of
loss will only impact small business
concerns that misrepresent their size or
status in connection with a contract,
subcontract, cooperative agreement,
cooperative research and development
agreement or grant in such a way that
criminal prosecution or other action is
taken by the Government. In fiscal year
2010, SBA found approximately 200
firms to be ineligible for a contract (14
HUBZone, 33 Service-Disabled VeteranOwned, 151 size). Not all of these firms
would be criminally prosecuted or have
others actions taken against them. Thus,
the proposed regulation concerning
presumption of loss will impact very
few concerns, and some of these
concerns are not actually small.
There are approximately 348,000
concerns listed as small business
concerns in the Dynamic Small
Business Search (DSBS) database. The
proposed regulations concerning
deemed certifications and the
requirement for a signature would apply
to all of these concerns, to the extent the
concerns submit an offer for a prime
contract that is set aside for small
business concerns. In addition, there are
small business concerns that are not
registered in the DSBS database that
submit offers or responses for grants,
subcontracts, and other agreements. The
annual certification requirement would
apply to all of the 348,000 firms
registered in the DSBS database.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:24 Oct 06, 2011
Jkt 226001
(d) Federal Rules Which May Duplicate,
Overlap or Conflict With the Proposed
Rule
Although firms registered in ORCA
are supposed to update their
certifications and representations on an
annual basis (FAR § 4.1201(b)(1)),
Section 1342 of the Jobs Act requires
that firms that fail to meet the annual
certification or representation
requirement shall lose their status as
small or some other socioeconomic
category in the database until such time
as the firm updates its size or
socioeconomic status. The requirement
to have an authorized official sign in
connection with the firm’s size or status
will be implemented in the Federal
Acquisition Regulation and will have to
be harmonized with current ORCA
requirements as well as electronic
commerce and electronic signature
rules. However, firms currently must
sign offers in many cases (e.g., Standard
Forms 26, 33 1447, and 1449).
represents its size and status, but
authorized officials already have to sign
offers. Firms will have to update their
size and socioeconomic status in ORCA
at least annually, but that is already
required. FAR § 4.1201(b)(1). The
proposed rule gives firms incentive to
update their size or status in ORCA, and
ensures that firms that do not update
their size or status will no longer be
listed as having small or socioeconomic
status, unless or until the firms update
their status.
List of Subjects
13 CFR Part 121
Administrative practice and
procedure, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, and Small Businesses.
13 CFR Part 124
Administrative practice and
procedure, Minority businesses,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, and Technical assistance.
13 CFR Part 125
Government contracts, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Small
businesses, and Technical assistance.
13 CFR Part 126
Administrative practice and
procedure, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements and Small
businesses.
13 CFR Part 127
Government procurement, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, and
Small businesses.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, SBA proposes to amend parts
121, 124, 125, 126 and 127 of title 13 of
the Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
PART 121—SMALL BUSINESS SIZE
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 121
is revised to read as follows:
(e) Significant Alternatives to the Rule
Which Could Minimize Impact on Small
Entities
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632, 634(b)(6), 636(b),
637(a), 644 and 662(5); and Pub. L. 105–135,
sec. 401 et. seq., 111 Stat. 2592.
The proposed regulations implement
Sections 1341 and 1342 of the Jobs Act.
The proposed regulations are directed at
small business concerns seeking
government contracts, subcontracts,
grants, and cooperative agreements. The
proposed rules are intended to prevent
or deter firms from misrepresenting
their size or socioeconomic status. The
impact on firms that accurately
represent their size or status will be
minimal. An authorized official will
have to sign an offer where the firm
2. Amend § 121.108 by revising
section heading and adding paragraphs
(a) through (e) to read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 121.108 What are the requirements for
representing small business size status,
and what are the penalties for
misrepresentation?
(a) Presumption of Loss Based on the
Total Amount Expended. In every
contract, subcontract, cooperative
agreement, cooperative research and
development agreement, or grant which
is set aside, reserved, or otherwise
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 195 / Friday, October 7, 2011 / Proposed Rules
classified as intended for award to small
business concerns, there shall be an
irrefutable presumption of loss to the
United States based on the total amount
expended on the contract, subcontract,
cooperative agreement, cooperative
research and development agreement, or
grant whenever it is established that a
business concern other than a small
business concern willfully sought and
received the award by
misrepresentation.
(b) Deemed Certifications. The
following actions shall be deemed
affirmative, willful and intentional
certifications of small business size and
status:
(1) Submission of a bid or proposal for
a Federal grant, contract, subcontract,
cooperative agreement, or cooperative
research and development agreement
reserved, set aside, or otherwise
classified as intended for award to small
business concerns.
(2) Submission of a bid proposal for
a Federal grant, contract, subcontract,
cooperative agreement or cooperative
research and development agreement
which in any way encourages a Federal
agency to classify the bid or proposal, if
awarded, as an award to a small
business concern.
(3) Registration on any Federal
electronic database for the purpose of
being considered for award of a Federal
grant, contract, subcontract, cooperative
agreement, or cooperative research and
development agreement, as a small
business concern.
(c) Signature Requirement. Each
solicitation, bid, or application for a
Federal contract, subcontract, or grant
shall contain a certification concerning
the small business size and status of a
business concern seeking the Federal
contract, subcontract or grant. An
authorized official must sign the
certification on the same page
containing the size status claimed by the
concern.
(d) Limitation of Liability. Paragraphs
(a)–(c) shall not apply in the case of
unintentional errors or technical
malfunctions that demonstrate that a
misrepresentation of size was not
affirmative, intentional or willful.
Consideration shall be given to the
firm’s internal management procedures
governing size representation or
certification, the clarity or ambiguity of
the representation or certification
requirement, and the efforts made to
correct an incorrect or invalid
representation or certification in a
timely manner. In no case shall an
individual or firm be liable for
erroneous representations or
certifications made by Government
personnel.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:24 Oct 06, 2011
Jkt 226001
(e) Additional Penalties for
Misrepresentation
(1) Suspension or debarment. The
SBA debarring official or the agency
debarring official may suspend or debar
a person or concern for
misrepresentation pursuant to the
procedures set forth in 48 CFR subpart
9.4.
(2) Civil Penalties. Persons or
concerns are subject to severe penalties
under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C.
3729–3733, and under the Program
Fraud Civil Remedies Act, 331 U.S.C.
3801–3812, and any other applicable
laws.
(3) Persons or concerns are subject to
severe criminal penalties for knowingly
misrepresenting the small business size
status of a concern in connection with
procurement programs pursuant to
section 16(d) of the Small Business Act,
15 U.S.C. 645(d), as amended; 18 U.S.C.
1001; and 31 U.S.C. 3729–3733. Persons
or concern are subject to criminal
penalties for knowingly making false
statements or misrepresentations to SBA
for the purpose of influencing any
actions of SBA pursuant to section 16(a)
of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C.
645(a), as amended, including failure to
correct ‘‘continuing representations’’ that
are no longer true.
3. Add new § 121.109 to read as
follows:
§ 121.109 What Must a Concern do in
order to be Identified as a Small Business
Concern in any Federal procurement
databases?
(a) In order to be identified as a small
business concern in the Online
Representations and Certifications
Application (ORCA) database (or any
successor thereto), a concern must
certify its size in connection with
specific size standards at least annually.
(b) If a firm identified as a small
business concern in ORCA fails to
certify its size within one year of a size
certification, the firm will not be listed
as a small business concern in ORCA,
unless and until the firm recertifies its
size.
4. Amend § 121.404(b) by removing
‘‘date of certification by SBA’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘date the SBA
program office requests a formal size
determination in connection with a
concern that is otherwise eligible for
program certification.’’
5. Amend § 121.411 by adding new
paragraphs (d), through (i) to read as
follows:
§ 121.411 What are the size procedures for
SBA’s section 8(d) Subcontracting
Program?
*
PO 00000
*
*
Frm 00007
*
Fmt 4702
*
Sfmt 4702
62317
(d) Presumption of Loss Based on the
Total Amount Expended. In every
contract, subcontract, cooperative
agreement, cooperative research and
development agreement, or grant which
is set aside, reserved, or otherwise
classified as intended for award to small
business concerns, there shall be an
irrefutable presumption of loss to the
United States based on the total amount
expended on the contract, subcontract,
cooperative agreement, cooperative
research and development agreement, or
grant whenever it is established that a
business concern other than a small
business concern willfully sought and
received the award by
misrepresentation.
(e) Deemed Certifications. The
following actions shall be deemed
affirmative, willful and intentional
certifications of small business size and
status:
(1) Submission of a bid or proposal for
a Federal grant, contract, subcontract,
cooperative agreement, or cooperative
research and development agreement
reserved, set aside, or otherwise
classified as intended for award to small
business concerns.
(2) Submission of a bid or proposal for
a Federal grant, contract, subcontract,
cooperative agreement or cooperative
research and development agreement
which in any way encourages a Federal
agency to classify the bid or proposal, if
awarded, as an award to a small
business concern.
(3) Registration on any Federal
electronic database for the purpose of
being considered for award of a Federal
grant, contract, subcontract, cooperative
agreement, or cooperative research and
development agreement, as a small
business concern.
(f) Signature Requirement. Each
solicitation, bid, or application for a
Federal contract, subcontract, or grant
shall contain a certification concerning
the small business size and status of a
business concern seeking the Federal
contract, subcontract or grant. An
authorized official must sign the
certification on the same page
containing the size status claimed by the
concern.
(g) Limitation of Liability. Paragraphs
(d)–(f) shall not apply in the case of
unintentional errors or technical
malfunctions that demonstrate that a
misrepresentation of size was not
affirmative, intentional or willful.
Consideration shall be given to the
firm’s internal management procedures
governing size representation or
certification, the clarity or ambiguity of
the representation or certification
requirement, and the efforts made to
correct an incorrect or invalid
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
62318
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 195 / Friday, October 7, 2011 / Proposed Rules
representation or certification in a
timely manner. In no case shall an
individual or firm be liable for
erroneous representations or
certifications made by Government
personnel.
(h) Additional Penalties for
Misrepresentation.
(1) Suspension or debarment. The
SBA debarring official or the agency
debarring official may suspend or debar
a person or concern for
misrepresentation pursuant to the
procedures set forth in 48 CFR subpart
9.4.
(2) Civil Penalties. Persons or
concerns are subject to severe penalties
under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C.
3729–3733, and under the Program
Fraud Civil Remedies Act, 331 U.S.C.
3801–3812, and any other applicable
laws.
(3) Persons or concerns are subject to
severe criminal penalties for knowingly
misrepresenting the small business size
status of a concern in connection with
procurement programs pursuant to
section 16(d) of the Small Business Act,
15 U.S.C. 645(d), as amended; 18 U.S.C.
1001; and 31 U.S.C. 3729–3733. Persons
or concern are subject to criminal
penalties for knowingly making false
statements or misrepresentations to SBA
for the purpose of influencing any
actions of SBA pursuant to section 16(a)
of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C.
645(a), as amended, including failure to
correct ‘‘continuing representations’’ that
are no longer true.
6. Amend § 121.1009 by revising
paragraph (f) to read as follows:
§ 121.1009 What are the procedures for
making size determinations?
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Notification of determination. SBA
will promptly notify the contracting
officer, the protester, and the protested
concern. SBA will send the notification
by verifiable means, which may include
facsimile, electronic mail, or overnight
delivery service.
*
*
*
*
*
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
PART 124—8(a) BUSINESS
DEVELOPMENT/SMALL
DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS STATUS
DETERMINATIONS
7. The authority citation for part 124
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632, 15 U.S.C.
634(b)(6), 636(j), 637(a), 637(d); and Pub. L.
99–661, Pub. L. 100–656, sec. 1207, Pub. L.
100–656, Pub. L. 101–37, Pub. L. 101–574,
and 42 U.S.C. 9815.
8. Add new § 124.521 to read as
follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:24 Oct 06, 2011
Jkt 226001
§ 124.521 What are the requirements for
representing 8(a) status, and what are the
penalties for misrepresentation?
(a) Presumption of Loss Based on the
Total Amount Expended. In every
contract, subcontract, cooperative
agreement, cooperative research and
development agreement, or grant which
is set aside, reserved, or otherwise
classified as intended for award to 8(a)
Participants, there shall be an irrefutable
presumption of loss to the United States
based on the total amount expended on
the contract, subcontract, cooperative
agreement, cooperative research and
development agreement, or grant
whenever it is established that a
business concern other than an 8(a)
Participant willfully sought and
received the award by
misrepresentation.
(b) Deemed Certifications. The
following actions shall be deemed
affirmative, willful and intentional
certifications of 8(a) status:
(1) Submission of a bid or proposal for
a Federal grant, contract, subcontract,
cooperative agreement, or cooperative
research and development agreement
reserved, set aside, or otherwise
classified as intended for award to 8(a)
Participants.
(2) Submission of a bid proposal for
a Federal grant, contract, subcontract,
cooperative agreement or cooperative
research and development agreement
which in any way encourages a Federal
agency to classify the bid or proposal, if
awarded, as an award to an 8(a)
Participant.
(3) Registration on any Federal
electronic database for the purpose of
being considered for award of a Federal
grant, contract, subcontract, cooperative
agreement, or cooperative research and
development agreement, as an 8(a)
Participant.
(c) Signature Requirement. Each
solicitation, bid, or application for a
Federal contract, subcontract, or grant
shall contain a certification concerning
the 8(a) status of a business concern
seeking the Federal contract,
subcontract or grant. An authorized
official must sign the certification on the
same page containing the 8(a) status
claimed by the concern.
(d) Limitation of Liability. Paragraphs
(a)–(c) shall not apply in the case of
unintentional errors or technical
malfunctions that demonstrate that a
misrepresentation of 8(a) status was not
affirmative, intentional or willful.
Consideration shall be given to the
firm’s internal management procedures
governing 8(a) representation or
certification, the clarity or ambiguity of
the representation or certification
requirement, and the efforts made to
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
correct an incorrect or invalid
representation or certification in a
timely manner. In no case shall an
individual or firm be liable for
erroneous representations or
certifications made by Government
personnel.
9. Add new § 124.1015 to read as
follows:
§ 124.1015 What are the requirements for
representing small disadvantaged business
status, and what are the penalties for
misrepresentation?
(a) Presumption of Loss Based on the
Total Amount Expended. In every
contract, subcontract, cooperative
agreement, cooperative research and
development agreement, or grant which
is set aside, reserved, or otherwise
classified as intended for award to small
disadvantaged business concerns, there
shall be an irrefutable presumption of
loss to the United States based on the
total amount expended on the contract,
subcontract, cooperative agreement,
cooperative research and development
agreement, or grant whenever it is
established that a business concern
other than a small disadvantaged
business concern willfully sought and
received the award by
misrepresentation.
(b) Deemed Certifications. The
following actions shall be deemed
affirmative, willful and intentional
certifications of small disadvantaged
business status:
(1) Submission of a bid or proposal for
a Federal grant, contract, subcontract,
cooperative agreement, or cooperative
research and development agreement
reserved, set aside, or otherwise
classified as intended for award to small
disadvantaged business concerns.
(2) Submission of a bid proposal for
a Federal grant, contract, subcontract,
cooperative agreement or cooperative
research and development agreement
which in any way encourages a Federal
agency to classify the bid or proposal, if
awarded, as an award to a small
disadvantaged business concern.
(3) Registration on any Federal
electronic database for the purpose of
being considered for award of a Federal
grant, contract, subcontract, cooperative
agreement, or cooperative research and
development agreement, as a small
disadvantaged business concern.
(c) Signature Requirement. Each
solicitation, bid, or application for a
Federal contract, subcontract, or grant
shall contain a certification concerning
the small disadvantaged business status
of a business concern seeking the
Federal contract, subcontract or grant.
An authorized official must sign the
certification on the same page
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 195 / Friday, October 7, 2011 / Proposed Rules
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
containing the small disadvantaged
status claimed by the concern.
(d) Limitation of Liability. Paragraphs
(a)–(c) shall not apply in the case of
unintentional errors or technical
malfunctions that demonstrate that a
misrepresentation of size was not
affirmative, intentional or willful.
Consideration shall be given to the
firm’s internal management procedures
governing SDB representation or
certification, the clarity or ambiguity of
the representation or certification
requirement, and the efforts made to
correct an incorrect or invalid
representation or certification in a
timely manner. In no case shall an
individual or firm be liable for
erroneous representations or
certifications made by Government
personnel.
(e) Additional Penalties for
Misrepresentation.
(1) Suspension or debarment. The
SBA debarring official or the agency
debarring official may suspend or debar
a person or concern for
misrepresentation pursuant to the
procedures set forth in 48 CFR subpart
9.4.
(2) Civil Penalties. Persons or
concerns are subject to severe penalties
under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C.
3729–3733, and under the Program
Fraud Civil Remedies Act, 331 U.S.C.
3801–3812, and any other applicable
laws.
(3) Persons or concerns are subject to
severe criminal penalties for knowingly
misrepresenting the small
disadvantaged business status of a
concern in connection with
procurement programs pursuant to
section 16(d) of the Small Business Act,
15 U.S.C. 645(d), as amended; 18 U.S.C.
1001; and 31 U.S.C. 3729–3733. Persons
or concerns are subject to criminal
penalties for knowingly making false
statements or misrepresentations to SBA
for the purpose of influencing any
actions of SBA pursuant to section 16(a)
of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C.
645(a), as amended, including failure to
correct ‘‘continuing representations’’ that
are no longer true.
10. Add new § 124.1016 to read as
follows:
§ 124.1016 What must a concern do in
order to be Identified as a Small
Disadvantaged Business Concern in any
Federal procurement databases?
(a) In order to be identified as a small
disadvantaged business concern in the
Online Representations and
Certifications Application (ORCA)
database, (or any successor thereto) a
concern must certify its small
disadvantaged business status in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:24 Oct 06, 2011
Jkt 226001
connection with specific eligibility
requirements at least annually.
(b) If a firm identified as a small
disadvantaged business concern in
ORCA fails to certify its status within
one year of a status certification, the
firm will not be listed as a small
disadvantaged business concern in
ORCA, unless and until the firm
recertifies its small disadvantaged
business status.
PART 125—GOVERNMENT
CONTRACTING PROGRAMS
11. The authority citation for part 125
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632, 634(b)(6), 637,
644 and 657f.
12. Amend § 125.29 by
a. Revising the section heading;
b. Revising paragraphs (a) through (c);
and
c. Adding new paragraphs (d) through
(e) to read as follows:
§ 125.29 What are the requirements for
representing service-disabled veteranowned small business status, and what are
the penalties for misrepresentation?
(a) Presumption of Loss Based on the
Total Amount Expended. In every
contract, subcontract, cooperative
agreement, cooperative research and
development agreement, or grant which
is set aside, reserved, or otherwise
classified as intended for award to
service-disabled veteran-owned small
business concerns, there shall be an
irrefutable presumption of loss to the
United States based on the total amount
expended on the contract, subcontract,
cooperative agreement, cooperative
research and development agreement, or
grant whenever it is established that a
business concern other than a servicedisabled veteran-owned small business
concern willfully sought and received
the award by misrepresentation.
(b) Deemed Certifications. The
following actions shall be deemed
affirmative, willful and intentional
certifications of service-disabled
veteran-owned small business status:
(1) Submission of a bid or proposal for
a Federal grant, contract, subcontract,
cooperative agreement, or cooperative
research and development agreement
reserved, set aside, or otherwise
classified as intended for award to
service-disabled veteran-owned small
business concerns.
(2) Submission of a bid proposal for
a Federal grant, contract, subcontract,
cooperative agreement or cooperative
research and development agreement
which in any way encourages a Federal
agency to classify the bid or proposal, if
awarded, as an award to a service-
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
62319
disabled veteran-owned small business
concern.
(3) Registration on any Federal
electronic database for the purpose of
being considered for award of a Federal
grant, contract, subcontract, cooperative
agreement, or cooperative research and
development agreement, as a small
disadvantaged business concern.
(c) Signature Requirement. Each
solicitation, bid, or application for a
Federal contract, subcontract, or grant
shall contain a certification concerning
the service-disabled veteran-owned
small business status of a business
concern seeking the Federal contract,
subcontract or grant. An authorized
official must sign the certification on the
same page containing the servicedisabled veteran-owned small business
status claimed by the concern.
(d) Limitation of Liability. Paragraphs
(a)—(c) shall not apply in the case of
unintentional errors or technical
malfunctions that demonstrate that a
misrepresentation of service-disabled
veteran-owned small business status
was not affirmative, intentional or
willful. Consideration shall be given to
the firm’s internal management
procedures governing SDVO SBC
representation or certification, the
clarity or ambiguity of the
representation or certification
requirement, and the efforts made to
correct an incorrect or invalid
representation or certification in a
timely manner. In no case shall an
individual or firm be liable for
erroneous representations or
certifications made by Government
personnel.
(e) Additional Penalties for
Misrepresentation.
(1) Suspension or debarment. The
SBA debarring official or the agency
debarring official may suspend or debar
a person or concern for
misrepresentation pursuant to the
procedures set forth in 48 CFR subpart
9.4.
(2) Civil Penalties. Persons or
concerns are subject to severe penalties
under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C.
3729–3733, and under the Program
Fraud Civil Remedies Act, 331 U.S.C.
3801–3812, and any other applicable
laws.
(3) Persons or concerns are subject to
severe criminal penalties for knowingly
misrepresenting the service-disabled
veteran-owned status of a concern in
connection with procurement programs
pursuant to section 16(d) of the Small
Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 645(d), as
amended; 18 U.S.C. 1001; and 31 U.S.C.
3729–3733. Persons or concerns are
subject to criminal penalties for
knowingly making false statements or
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
62320
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 195 / Friday, October 7, 2011 / Proposed Rules
misrepresentations to SBA for the
purpose of influencing any actions of
SBA pursuant to section 16(a) of the
Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 645(a), as
amended, including failure to correct
‘‘continuing representations’’ that are no
longer true.
13. Add new § 125.30 to read as
follows:
§ 125.30 What must a concern do in order
to be identified as a Service-Disabled
Veteran-Owned Small Business concern in
any Federal procurement databases?
(a) In order to be identified as a
Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned
business concern in the Online
Representations and Certifications
Application (ORCA) database (or any
successor thereto) a concern must
certify its Service-Disabled VeteranOwned small business status in
connection with specific eligibility
requirements at least annually.
(b) If a firm identified as a ServiceDisabled Veteran-Owned small business
concern in ORCA fails to certify its
status within one year of a status
certification, the firm will not be listed
as a Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned
small business concern in ORCA, unless
and until the firm recertifies its ServiceDisabled Veteran-Owned status.
PART 126—HUBZONE PROGRAM
14. The authority citation for part 126
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632 and 657(a).
15. Amend § 126.900 by:
a. Revising the section heading;
b. Revising paragraphs (a)–(c); and
c. Adding new paragraphs (d)–(e) to
read as follows:
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
§ 126.900 What are the requirements for
representing HUBZone status, and what are
the penalties for misrepresentation?
(a) Presumption of Loss Based on the
Total Amount Expended. In every
contract, subcontract, cooperative
agreement, cooperative research and
development agreement, or grant which
is set aside, reserved, or otherwise
classified as intended for award to
HUBZone small business concerns,
there shall be an irrefutable
presumption of loss to the United States
based on the total amount expended on
the contract, subcontract, cooperative
agreement, cooperative research and
development agreement, or grant
whenever it is established that a
business concern other than a HUBZone
small business concern willfully sought
and received the award by
misrepresentation.
(b) Deemed Certifications. The
following actions shall be deemed
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:24 Oct 06, 2011
Jkt 226001
affirmative, willful and intentional
certifications of HUBZone small
business status:
(1) Submission of a bid or proposal for
a Federal grant, contract, subcontract,
cooperative agreement, or cooperative
research and development agreement
reserved, set aside, or otherwise
classified as intended for award to
HUBZone small business concerns.
(2) Submission of a bid proposal for
a Federal grant, contract, subcontract,
cooperative agreement or cooperative
research and development agreement
which in any way encourages a Federal
agency to classify the bid or proposal, if
awarded, as an award to a HUBZone
small business concern.
(3) Registration on any Federal
electronic database for the purpose of
being considered for award of a Federal
grant, contract, subcontract, cooperative
agreement, or cooperative research and
development agreement, as a HUBZone
small business concern.
(c) Signature Requirement. Each
solicitation, bid, or application for a
Federal contract, subcontract, or grant
shall contain a certification concerning
the HUBZone small business status of a
business concern seeking the Federal
contract, subcontract or grant. An
authorized official must sign the
certification on the same page
containing the HUBZone status claimed
by the concern.
(d) Limitation of Liability. Paragraphs
(a)–(c) shall not apply in the case of
unintentional errors or technical
malfunctions that demonstrate that a
misrepresentation of HUBZone status
was not affirmative, intentional or
willful. Consideration shall be given to
the firm’s internal management
procedures governing HUBZone SBC
representation or certification, the
clarity or ambiguity of the
representation or certification
requirement, and the efforts made to
correct an incorrect or invalid
representation or certification in a
timely manner. In no case shall an
individual or firm be liable for
erroneous representations or
certifications made by Government
personnel.
(e) Additional Penalties for
Misrepresentation
(1) Suspension or debarment. The
SBA debarring official or the agency
debarring official may suspend or debar
a person or concern for
misrepresentation pursuant to the
procedures set forth in 48 CFR subpart
9.4.
(2) Civil Penalties. Persons or
concerns are subject to severe penalties
under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C.
3729–3733, and under the Program
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Fraud Civil Remedies Act, 331 U.S.C.
3801–3812, and any other applicable
laws.
(3) Persons or concerns are subject to
severe criminal penalties for knowingly
misrepresenting the HUBZone status of
a concern in connection with
procurement programs pursuant to
section 16(d) of the Small Business Act,
15 U.S.C. 645(d), as amended; 18 U.S.C.
1001; and 31 U.S.C. 3729–3733. Persons
or concerns are subject to criminal
penalties for knowingly making false
statements or misrepresentations to SBA
for the purpose of influencing any
actions of SBA pursuant to section 16(a)
of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C.
645(a), as amended, including failure to
correct ‘‘continuing representations’’ that
are no longer true.
PART 127—WOMEN–OWNED SMALL
BUSINESS FEDERAL CONTRACT
PROGRAM
16. The authority citation for part 127
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632, 634(b)(6),
637(m), and 644.
17. Amend § 127.700 by:
a. Revising the section heading;
b. Revising paragraphs (a)–(c); and
c. Adding new paragraphs (d)–(e):
§ 127.700 What are the requirements for
representing women-owned small business
or economically disadvantaged womenowned small business status, and what are
the penalties for misrepresentation?
(a) Presumption of Loss Based on the
Total Amount Expended. In every
contract, subcontract, cooperative
agreement, cooperative research and
development agreement, or grant which
is set aside, reserved, or otherwise
classified as intended for award to
women-owned small business concerns
or economically disadvantaged womenowned small business concerns, there
shall be an irrefutable presumption of
loss to the United States based on the
total amount expended on the contract,
subcontract, cooperative agreement,
cooperative research and development
agreement, or grant whenever it is
established that a business concern
other than a women-owned small
business concern or economically
disadvantaged women-owned small
business concern willfully sought and
received the award by
misrepresentation.
(b) Deemed Certifications. The
following actions shall be deemed
affirmative, willful and intentional
certifications of women-owned small
business or economically disadvantaged
women-owned small business status:
(1) Submission of a bid or proposal for
a Federal grant, contract, subcontract,
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 195 / Friday, October 7, 2011 / Proposed Rules
cooperative agreement, or cooperative
research and development agreement
reserved, set aside, or otherwise
classified as intended for award to
women-owned small business concerns
or economically disadvantaged womenowned small business concerns.
(2) Submission of a bid proposal for
a Federal grant, contract, subcontract,
cooperative agreement or cooperative
research and development agreement
which in any way encourages a Federal
agency to classify the bid or proposal, if
awarded, as an award to a womenowned small business concern or
economically disadvantaged womenowned small business concern.
(3) Registration on any Federal
electronic database for the purpose of
being considered for award of a Federal
grant, contract, subcontract, cooperative
agreement, or cooperative research and
development agreement, as a womenowned small business concern or
economically disadvantaged womenowned small business concern.
(c) Signature Requirement. Each
solicitation, bid, or application for a
Federal contract, subcontract, or grant
shall contain a certification concerning
the women-owned small business or
economically disadvantaged womenowned small business status of a
business concern seeking the Federal
contract, subcontract or grant. An
authorized official must sign the
certification on the same page
containing the women-owned small
business or economically disadvantaged
women-owned small business status
claimed by the concern.
(d) Limitation of Liability. Paragraphs
(a)–(c) shall not apply in the case of
unintentional errors or technical
malfunctions that demonstrate that a
misrepresentation of women-owned
small business or economically
disadvantaged women-owned small
business status was not affirmative,
intentional or willful. Consideration
shall be given to the firm’s internal
management procedures governing
WOSB representation or certification,
the clarity or ambiguity of the
representation or certification
requirement, and the efforts made to
correct an incorrect or invalid
representation or certification in a
timely manner. In no case shall an
individual or firm be liable for
erroneous representations or
certifications made by Government
personnel.
(e) Additional Penalties for
Misrepresentation.
(1) Suspension or debarment. The
SBA debarring official or the agency
debarring official may suspend or debar
a person or concern for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:24 Oct 06, 2011
Jkt 226001
misrepresentation pursuant to the
procedures set forth in 48 CFR subpart
9.4.
(2) Civil Penalties. Persons or
concerns are subject to severe penalties
under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C.
3729–3733, and under the Program
Fraud Civil Remedies Act, 331 U.S.C.
3801–3812, and any other applicable
laws.
(3) Persons or concerns are subject to
severe criminal penalties for knowingly
misrepresenting the women-owned
status of a concern in connection with
procurement programs pursuant to
section 16(d) of the Small Business Act,
15 U.S.C. 645(d), as amended; 18 U.S.C.
1001; and 31 U.S.C. 3729–3733. Persons
or concern are subject to criminal
penalties for knowingly making false
statements or misrepresentations to SBA
for the purpose of influencing any
actions of SBA pursuant to section 16(a)
of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C.
645(a), as amended, including failure to
correct ‘‘continuing representations’’ that
are no longer true.
18. Add new § 127.701 to read as
follows:
§ 127.701 What must a concern do in order
to be identified as a Women-Owned Small
Business concern in any Federal
procurement databases?
(a) In order to be identified as a
Women-Owned business concern in the
Online Representations and
Certifications Application (ORCA)
database (or any successor thereto) a
concern must certify its Women-Owned
small business status in connection with
specific eligibility requirements at least
annually.
(b) If a firm identified as a WomenOwned small business concern in ORCA
fails to certify its status within one year
of a status certification, the firm will not
be listed as a Women-Owned small
business concern in ORCA, unless and
until the firm recertifies its WomenOwned status.
Dated: September 26, 2011.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011–25656 Filed 10–6–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
62321
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–1204; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–147–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Aviation
Communication & Surveillance
Systems (ACSS) Traffic Alert and
Collision Avoidance System (TCAS)
Units
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM);
reopening of comment period.
AGENCY:
We are revising an earlier
proposed airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Aviation Communication &
Surveillance Systems (ACSS) traffic
alert and collision avoidance system
(TCAS) units installed on but not
limited to various transport and small
airplanes. That NPRM proposed to
require upgrading software. That NPRM
was prompted by reports of anomalies
with TCAS units during a flight test
over a high density airport. The TCAS
units dropped several reduced
surveillance aircraft tracks because of
interference limiting. This action revises
that NPRM by proposing to require new
updated software for certain TCAS
units. We are proposing this
supplemental NPRM to correct the
unsafe condition on these products.
Since these actions impose an
additional burden over that proposed in
the NPRM, we are reopening the
comment period to allow the public the
chance to comment on these proposed
changes.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this supplemental NPRM by November
7, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 195 (Friday, October 7, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 62313-62321]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25656]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Parts 121, 124, 125, 126, 127
RIN 3245-AG23
Small Business Size and Status Integrity
AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA or Agency) is
proposing to amend its regulations to implement provisions of the Small
Business Jobs Act of 2010 (Jobs Act) pertaining to small business size
and status integrity. SBA is proposing to amend its program regulations
to implement statutory provisions establishing that there is a
presumption of loss equal to the value of the contract or other
instrument when a concern willfully seeks and receives an award by
misrepresentation. SBA is proposing to amend its program regulations to
implement statutory provisions that provide that the submission of an
offer or application for an award intended for small business concerns
will be deemed a size or status certification or representation in
certain circumstances. SBA is proposing to amend its program
regulations to implement statutory provisions that provide that an
authorized official must sign in connection with a size or status
certification or representation for a
[[Page 62314]]
contract or other instrument. SBA is proposing to amend its regulations
to implement statutory provisions that provide that concerns that fail
to update their size or status in the Online Representations and
Certifications Application (ORCA) database (or any successor thereto)
at least annually shall no longer be identified in the database as
small or some other socioeconomic status, until the representation is
updated. Finally, SBA is proposing to amend its regulations to clarify
when size is determined for purposes of entry into the 8(a) Business
Development and HUBZone programs.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 7, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by RIN: 3245-AG23, by
any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail, for paper, disk, or CD/ROM submissions: Dean Koppel,
U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Government Contracting,
409 Third Street, SW., 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20416.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Dean Koppel, U.S. Small Business
Administration, Office of Government Contracting, 409 Third Street,
SW., 8th Floor Washington, DC 20416.
SBA will post all comments on https://www.regulations.gov. If you
wish to submit confidential business information (CBI) as defined in
the User Notice at https://www.Regulations.gov, please submit the
information to Dean Koppel, U.S. Small Business Administration, Office
of Government Contracting, 409 Third Street, SW., 8th Floor,
Washington, DC 20416, or send an e-mail to Dean.Koppel@sba.gov.
Highlight the information that you consider to be CBI and explain why
you believe SBA should hold this information as confidential. SBA will
review the information and make the final determination on whether it
will publish the information or not.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Koppel, Office of Government
Contracting, 409 Third Street SW., Washington, DC 20416; (202) 205-
9751; Dean.Koppel@sba.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 27, 2010, Congress amended the
Small Business Act to provide that if a concern willfully seeks and
receives an award by misrepresenting its small business size or other
socioeconomic status, there is a presumption of loss to the United
States equal to the value of the contract, subcontract, cooperative
agreement, cooperative research and development agreement or grant. The
Senate Report indicates that this presumption is ``irrefutable.''
Senate Rep. No. 111-343, p. 8. The amendments also provide that certain
actions, such as submitting an offer in response to a solicitation set
aside for small business concerns, will be deemed a representation of
small business size or status. The amendments require the signature of
an authorized official of a concern making a small business size or
status representation in connection with certain actions, such as
submitting an offer. The amendments further provide that concerns must
update their size and status certifications in ORCA at least annually,
or the status will be lost until such time as the update is made.
Finally, the amendments further provide that SBA must promulgate
regulations to protect individuals and concerns from liability in cases
of unintentional errors, technical malfunctions and other similar
situations.
In accordance with 15 U.S.C. 632(w), SBA is proposing to amend its
Size (121.108, 121.411), 8(a) (124.521), Small Disadvantaged Business
(SDB) (124.1015), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned (SDVO) (125.29),
HUBZone (126.900) and Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) (127.700)
regulations to notify firms participating in those programs about the
statutory presumption of loss provisions; the statutory deemed
certification provisions; the statutory signature requirement in
connection with offers; and the statutory limitation of liability
provisions. In addition, SBA is proposing to amend its Size, SDB, SDVO,
HUBZone and WOSB regulations to notify firms participating in these
programs of the additional penalties for misrepresentations set forth
in 15 U.S.C. Sec. 645(d). SBA is not proposing to amend its 8(a)
regulations to add this notice because 8(a) Participants are not
mentioned in 15 U.S.C. 645(d).
In accordance with 15 U.S.C. 632(x), SBA is also proposing to amend
its regulations to add provisions (121.109, 124.1016, 125.30, 127.701)
requiring a firm to update its size, small disadvantaged business,
service-disabled veteran-owned or women-owned small business status
certification in federal databases at least annually, and to require
that a firm that fails to certify its size or status within one year of
a prior certification will no longer be listed as a firm of that size
or status, until the firm recertifies its status in connection with the
specific relevant size standard or eligibility requirements. SBA is not
proposing to add such a requirement for purposes of the 8(a) BD or
HUBZone programs, because the Small Business Administration is
responsible for providing these certification designations in federal
procurement databases.
SBA's regulations currently provide that a concern applying for
certification into the 8(a) Business Development or HUBZone programs
must be small for its primary industry at the time of application and
``the date of certification by SBA.'' 13 CFR 121.404(b). If the SBA
8(a) or HUBZone program office believes that an applicant is other than
small, the SBA program office requests a formal size determination from
the relevant SBA Office Government Contracting Area Office. However,
SBA will not certify a firm into these programs if it believes the firm
is other than small. Consequently, an issue in administrative
litigation has arisen concerning what date to use to determine the
firm's size as of the ``date of certification'' into the program.
Obviously, SBA does not want to certify a firm into one of the 8(a) or
HUBZone programs in the firm is other than small for the work for which
it is primarily engaged. Consequently, we are proposing to amend the
size regulations to provide that for purposes of entry into these
programs, a firm must be small at the date of application and the date
the program office requests a formal size determination in connection
with a firm that is otherwise eligible for program certification.
SBA is also proposing to update its size protest regulations to add
additional methods for serving formal size determinations. The current
regulation limits the notification method to certified mail, return
receipt requested, or overnight delivery. In addition, SBA is proposing
to remove the current requirement that SBA provide the formal size
determination to all of the protested concern's affiliates, or alleged
affiliates. A concern can have hundreds of affiliates or alleged
affiliates, and it is impractical and costly to provide a decision to
all of these entities.
Compliance With Executive Orders 12866, 13563, 12988, 13132, the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35), and the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5. U.S.C. 601-612)
Executive Orders 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this
rule is a significant regulatory action for purposes of Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the next section contains SBA's Regulatory Impact
Analysis. This is not a major rule, however, under the
[[Page 62315]]
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 80, et seq.
Regulatory Impact Analysis
1. Is there a need for the regulatory action? The proposed
regulations would implement Sections 1341 and 1342 of the Small
Business Jobs Act of 2010, Public Law 111-240, 124 Stat. 2504,
September 27, 2010 (Jobs Act) which are codified at 15 U.S.C. 632(w),
(x). Sections 1341 and 1342 of the Jobs Act require the Administrator
to promulgate regulations implementing some of the provisions within
one year of enactment.
2. What are the potential benefits and costs of this regulatory
action? It is the declared statutory policy of the United States that
small business concerns receive their fair proportion of government
contracts, to spur creativity and innovation, increase employment and
strengthen the industrial base. Several recent Government
Accountability Office reports indicate that ineligible concerns may be
receiving benefits to which they are not entitled. This in turn harms
legitimate small business concerns that not only do not receive the
contracts, but may be deprived of future contracting opportunities
because of the attention garnered by these bad actors. The presumption
of loss, deemed certification and signature requirement will make it
easier to prosecute, seek damages or suspend or debar concerns and
individuals that willfully misrepresent their size and socioeconomic
status in order to gain a contract, subcontract, grant or cooperative
agreement. The rule proposes to force concerns to update their size or
status in federal procurement databases at least annually, or else the
firms will lose their status in those databases. Standard contracting
and grant forms will have to be amended to allow an authorized official
to sign on the same page as the size or status that the firm is
claiming. The Online Certification and Representation (ORCA) database
will have to be programmed to automatically change the size or
socioeconomic status of firms that fail to update their size or
socioeconomic status at least annually. SBA believes that the potential
costs associated with these changes, which are required by statute, are
relatively minor and are significantly outweighed by the benefits to
the integrity of small business procurement, grant and research
programs and the intended beneficiaries.
3. What are the alternatives to this final rule? The proposed
regulations are required to implement statutory provisions. The
requirements are clear, and the Jobs Act requires promulgation of
regulations implementing certain portions of the Jobs Act within one
year.
Executive Order 13563
The proposed regulations implement important statutory provisions
intended to prevent and deter fraud and misrepresentation in small
business government contracting and other programs. SBA proposes to
amend all applicable parts of its regulations to put participants in
those programs on notice of the penalties associated with
misrepresentation, and to the extent practicable, utilize identical
language in each Part. SBA is also proposing to include in each part
other relevant applicable statutory provisions concerning the penalties
for misrepresentation. The costs associated with these proposed rules,
requiring a signature in connection with a size or status
representation and requiring concerns to update online certifications
annually, are minimal and required by statute. As part of its
implementation of this executive order and consistent with its
commitment to public participation in the rulemaking process, SBA held
public meetings in 13 locations around the country to discuss
implementation of the Jobs Act, and received public input from
thousands of small business owners, contracting officials and large
business representatives.
Executive Order 12988
For purposes of Executive Order 12988, SBA has drafted this
proposed rule, to the extent practicable, in accordance with the
standards set forth in section 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of that Order, to
minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. This rule
has no preemptive or retroactive effect.
Executive Order 13132
This rule does not have federalism implications as defined in
Executive Order 13132. It will not have substantial direct effects on
the States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various layers of government, as specified in the order. As such it
does not warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C., Chapter 35
For the purpose of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. chapter
35, SBA has determined that this rule, if adopted in final form, would
not impose new reporting requirements and would not require new
recordkeeping requirements. In accordance with Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) Sec. Sec. 4.1202, 52.204-8, 52.219-1 and 13 CFR
121.404(a), 121.411, concerns must submit paper or electronic
representations or certifications in connection with prime contracts
and subcontracts. The Jobs Act requires that each offeror or applicant
for a Federal contract, subcontract, or grant shall contain a
certification concerning the small business size and status of a
business concern seeking the Federal contract, subcontract or grant.
The Jobs Act mandates that an authorized official must sign the
certification on the same page containing the size and status claimed
by the concern. Offerors are already required to sign their offers,
bids or quotes (Standard Forms 18, 30, 33, 1449), so this provision
does not create new reporting or recordkeeping requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
SBA has determined that this proposed rule, if adopted in final
form, may have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612. Therefore, SBA has prepared an Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Act (IRFA) analysis addressing the proposed
regulation.
IRFA
When preparing a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, an agency shall
address all of the following: a description of why the action by the
agency is being considered; the objectives and legal basis of the rule;
the estimated number of small entities to which the rule may apply; a
description of the projected reporting, recordkeeping and other
compliance requirements; identification of all Federal rules which may
duplicate, overlap or conflict with the proposed rule; and a
description of significant alternatives which minimize any significant
economic impact on small entities. This IRFA considers these points and
the impact the proposed regulation concerning small business size and
status integrity may have on small entities.
(a) Need for, Objectives, and Legal Basis of the Rule
The proposed regulatory amendments implement Sections 1341 and 1342
of the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010, Public Law 111-240, 124 Stat.
2504, September 27, 2010 (Jobs Act); 15 U.S.C. 632(w), (x). The purpose
of the statute and implementing regulations is to prevent or deter
firms from
[[Page 62316]]
misrepresenting their size or socioeconomic status.
(b) Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which the Rule May
Apply
The RFA directs agencies to provide a description of and, where
feasible, an estimate of the number of entities that may be affected by
the proposed rules, if adopted. The RFA defines ``small entity'' to
include ``small businesses,'' ``small organizations,'' and ``small
governmental jurisdictions.'' SBA's programs do not apply to ``small
organizations'' or ``small governmental jurisdictions'' because they
are non-profit or governmental entities and do not generally qualify as
``business concerns'' within the meaning of SBA's regulations. SBA's
programs generally apply only to for-profit business concerns.
Therefore, the proposed regulation will not impact small organizations
or small governmental jurisdictions.
In fiscal year 2010, there were approximately 3.35 million small
business contract actions. The proposed regulations concerning
presumption of loss will only impact small business concerns that
misrepresent their size or status in connection with a contract,
subcontract, cooperative agreement, cooperative research and
development agreement or grant in such a way that criminal prosecution
or other action is taken by the Government. In fiscal year 2010, SBA
found approximately 200 firms to be ineligible for a contract (14
HUBZone, 33 Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned, 151 size). Not all of these
firms would be criminally prosecuted or have others actions taken
against them. Thus, the proposed regulation concerning presumption of
loss will impact very few concerns, and some of these concerns are not
actually small.
There are approximately 348,000 concerns listed as small business
concerns in the Dynamic Small Business Search (DSBS) database. The
proposed regulations concerning deemed certifications and the
requirement for a signature would apply to all of these concerns, to
the extent the concerns submit an offer for a prime contract that is
set aside for small business concerns. In addition, there are small
business concerns that are not registered in the DSBS database that
submit offers or responses for grants, subcontracts, and other
agreements. The annual certification requirement would apply to all of
the 348,000 firms registered in the DSBS database.
(c) Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping and Other Compliance
Requirements
This proposed rule would not impose a new information collection,
recordkeeping or compliance requirement on small businesses. A firm's
size or socioeconomic status is generally based on records that it
already possesses, such as payroll records and annual tax returns.
Firms currently must represent their size or status in connection with
contracts and subcontracts, either electronically or in paper form. FAR
Sec. Sec. 4.1202, 52.204-8, 52.219-1 and 13 CFR 121.404(a), 121.411.
The proposed rule requires an authorized official to sign on the page
containing a concern's size or status representation. Offerors are
generally required to sign their offers (e.g., Standard Forms 26, 33,
1447, 1449), so the burden on small business concerns to also sign
their size or status representation or certification will be minimal.
(d) Federal Rules Which May Duplicate, Overlap or Conflict With the
Proposed Rule
Although firms registered in ORCA are supposed to update their
certifications and representations on an annual basis (FAR Sec.
4.1201(b)(1)), Section 1342 of the Jobs Act requires that firms that
fail to meet the annual certification or representation requirement
shall lose their status as small or some other socioeconomic category
in the database until such time as the firm updates its size or
socioeconomic status. The requirement to have an authorized official
sign in connection with the firm's size or status will be implemented
in the Federal Acquisition Regulation and will have to be harmonized
with current ORCA requirements as well as electronic commerce and
electronic signature rules. However, firms currently must sign offers
in many cases (e.g., Standard Forms 26, 33 1447, and 1449).
(e) Significant Alternatives to the Rule Which Could Minimize Impact on
Small Entities
The proposed regulations implement Sections 1341 and 1342 of the
Jobs Act. The proposed regulations are directed at small business
concerns seeking government contracts, subcontracts, grants, and
cooperative agreements. The proposed rules are intended to prevent or
deter firms from misrepresenting their size or socioeconomic status.
The impact on firms that accurately represent their size or status will
be minimal. An authorized official will have to sign an offer where the
firm represents its size and status, but authorized officials already
have to sign offers. Firms will have to update their size and
socioeconomic status in ORCA at least annually, but that is already
required. FAR Sec. 4.1201(b)(1). The proposed rule gives firms
incentive to update their size or status in ORCA, and ensures that
firms that do not update their size or status will no longer be listed
as having small or socioeconomic status, unless or until the firms
update their status.
List of Subjects
13 CFR Part 121
Administrative practice and procedure, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, and Small Businesses.
13 CFR Part 124
Administrative practice and procedure, Minority businesses,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, and Technical assistance.
13 CFR Part 125
Government contracts, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Small businesses, and Technical assistance.
13 CFR Part 126
Administrative practice and procedure, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements and Small businesses.
13 CFR Part 127
Government procurement, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
and Small businesses.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, SBA proposes to amend parts
121, 124, 125, 126 and 127 of title 13 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 121--SMALL BUSINESS SIZE REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 121 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632, 634(b)(6), 636(b), 637(a), 644 and
662(5); and Pub. L. 105-135, sec. 401 et. seq., 111 Stat. 2592.
2. Amend Sec. 121.108 by revising section heading and adding
paragraphs (a) through (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 121.108 What are the requirements for representing small
business size status, and what are the penalties for misrepresentation?
(a) Presumption of Loss Based on the Total Amount Expended. In
every contract, subcontract, cooperative agreement, cooperative
research and development agreement, or grant which is set aside,
reserved, or otherwise
[[Page 62317]]
classified as intended for award to small business concerns, there
shall be an irrefutable presumption of loss to the United States based
on the total amount expended on the contract, subcontract, cooperative
agreement, cooperative research and development agreement, or grant
whenever it is established that a business concern other than a small
business concern willfully sought and received the award by
misrepresentation.
(b) Deemed Certifications. The following actions shall be deemed
affirmative, willful and intentional certifications of small business
size and status:
(1) Submission of a bid or proposal for a Federal grant, contract,
subcontract, cooperative agreement, or cooperative research and
development agreement reserved, set aside, or otherwise classified as
intended for award to small business concerns.
(2) Submission of a bid proposal for a Federal grant, contract,
subcontract, cooperative agreement or cooperative research and
development agreement which in any way encourages a Federal agency to
classify the bid or proposal, if awarded, as an award to a small
business concern.
(3) Registration on any Federal electronic database for the purpose
of being considered for award of a Federal grant, contract,
subcontract, cooperative agreement, or cooperative research and
development agreement, as a small business concern.
(c) Signature Requirement. Each solicitation, bid, or application
for a Federal contract, subcontract, or grant shall contain a
certification concerning the small business size and status of a
business concern seeking the Federal contract, subcontract or grant. An
authorized official must sign the certification on the same page
containing the size status claimed by the concern.
(d) Limitation of Liability. Paragraphs (a)-(c) shall not apply in
the case of unintentional errors or technical malfunctions that
demonstrate that a misrepresentation of size was not affirmative,
intentional or willful. Consideration shall be given to the firm's
internal management procedures governing size representation or
certification, the clarity or ambiguity of the representation or
certification requirement, and the efforts made to correct an incorrect
or invalid representation or certification in a timely manner. In no
case shall an individual or firm be liable for erroneous
representations or certifications made by Government personnel.
(e) Additional Penalties for Misrepresentation
(1) Suspension or debarment. The SBA debarring official or the
agency debarring official may suspend or debar a person or concern for
misrepresentation pursuant to the procedures set forth in 48 CFR
subpart 9.4.
(2) Civil Penalties. Persons or concerns are subject to severe
penalties under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3729-3733, and under
the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act, 331 U.S.C. 3801-3812, and any
other applicable laws.
(3) Persons or concerns are subject to severe criminal penalties
for knowingly misrepresenting the small business size status of a
concern in connection with procurement programs pursuant to section
16(d) of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 645(d), as amended; 18
U.S.C. 1001; and 31 U.S.C. 3729-3733. Persons or concern are subject to
criminal penalties for knowingly making false statements or
misrepresentations to SBA for the purpose of influencing any actions of
SBA pursuant to section 16(a) of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C.
645(a), as amended, including failure to correct ``continuing
representations'' that are no longer true.
3. Add new Sec. 121.109 to read as follows:
Sec. 121.109 What Must a Concern do in order to be Identified as a
Small Business Concern in any Federal procurement databases?
(a) In order to be identified as a small business concern in the
Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA) database
(or any successor thereto), a concern must certify its size in
connection with specific size standards at least annually.
(b) If a firm identified as a small business concern in ORCA fails
to certify its size within one year of a size certification, the firm
will not be listed as a small business concern in ORCA, unless and
until the firm recertifies its size.
4. Amend Sec. 121.404(b) by removing ``date of certification by
SBA'' and adding in its place ``date the SBA program office requests a
formal size determination in connection with a concern that is
otherwise eligible for program certification.''
5. Amend Sec. 121.411 by adding new paragraphs (d), through (i) to
read as follows:
Sec. 121.411 What are the size procedures for SBA's section 8(d)
Subcontracting Program?
* * * * *
(d) Presumption of Loss Based on the Total Amount Expended. In
every contract, subcontract, cooperative agreement, cooperative
research and development agreement, or grant which is set aside,
reserved, or otherwise classified as intended for award to small
business concerns, there shall be an irrefutable presumption of loss to
the United States based on the total amount expended on the contract,
subcontract, cooperative agreement, cooperative research and
development agreement, or grant whenever it is established that a
business concern other than a small business concern willfully sought
and received the award by misrepresentation.
(e) Deemed Certifications. The following actions shall be deemed
affirmative, willful and intentional certifications of small business
size and status:
(1) Submission of a bid or proposal for a Federal grant, contract,
subcontract, cooperative agreement, or cooperative research and
development agreement reserved, set aside, or otherwise classified as
intended for award to small business concerns.
(2) Submission of a bid or proposal for a Federal grant, contract,
subcontract, cooperative agreement or cooperative research and
development agreement which in any way encourages a Federal agency to
classify the bid or proposal, if awarded, as an award to a small
business concern.
(3) Registration on any Federal electronic database for the purpose
of being considered for award of a Federal grant, contract,
subcontract, cooperative agreement, or cooperative research and
development agreement, as a small business concern.
(f) Signature Requirement. Each solicitation, bid, or application
for a Federal contract, subcontract, or grant shall contain a
certification concerning the small business size and status of a
business concern seeking the Federal contract, subcontract or grant. An
authorized official must sign the certification on the same page
containing the size status claimed by the concern.
(g) Limitation of Liability. Paragraphs (d)-(f) shall not apply in
the case of unintentional errors or technical malfunctions that
demonstrate that a misrepresentation of size was not affirmative,
intentional or willful. Consideration shall be given to the firm's
internal management procedures governing size representation or
certification, the clarity or ambiguity of the representation or
certification requirement, and the efforts made to correct an incorrect
or invalid
[[Page 62318]]
representation or certification in a timely manner. In no case shall an
individual or firm be liable for erroneous representations or
certifications made by Government personnel.
(h) Additional Penalties for Misrepresentation.
(1) Suspension or debarment. The SBA debarring official or the
agency debarring official may suspend or debar a person or concern for
misrepresentation pursuant to the procedures set forth in 48 CFR
subpart 9.4.
(2) Civil Penalties. Persons or concerns are subject to severe
penalties under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3729-3733, and under
the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act, 331 U.S.C. 3801-3812, and any
other applicable laws.
(3) Persons or concerns are subject to severe criminal penalties
for knowingly misrepresenting the small business size status of a
concern in connection with procurement programs pursuant to section
16(d) of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 645(d), as amended; 18
U.S.C. 1001; and 31 U.S.C. 3729-3733. Persons or concern are subject to
criminal penalties for knowingly making false statements or
misrepresentations to SBA for the purpose of influencing any actions of
SBA pursuant to section 16(a) of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C.
645(a), as amended, including failure to correct ``continuing
representations'' that are no longer true.
6. Amend Sec. 121.1009 by revising paragraph (f) to read as
follows:
Sec. 121.1009 What are the procedures for making size determinations?
* * * * *
(f) Notification of determination. SBA will promptly notify the
contracting officer, the protester, and the protested concern. SBA will
send the notification by verifiable means, which may include facsimile,
electronic mail, or overnight delivery service.
* * * * *
PART 124--8(a) BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT/SMALL DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS
STATUS DETERMINATIONS
7. The authority citation for part 124 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632, 15 U.S.C. 634(b)(6), 636(j), 637(a),
637(d); and Pub. L. 99-661, Pub. L. 100-656, sec. 1207, Pub. L. 100-
656, Pub. L. 101-37, Pub. L. 101-574, and 42 U.S.C. 9815.
8. Add new Sec. 124.521 to read as follows:
Sec. 124.521 What are the requirements for representing 8(a) status,
and what are the penalties for misrepresentation?
(a) Presumption of Loss Based on the Total Amount Expended. In
every contract, subcontract, cooperative agreement, cooperative
research and development agreement, or grant which is set aside,
reserved, or otherwise classified as intended for award to 8(a)
Participants, there shall be an irrefutable presumption of loss to the
United States based on the total amount expended on the contract,
subcontract, cooperative agreement, cooperative research and
development agreement, or grant whenever it is established that a
business concern other than an 8(a) Participant willfully sought and
received the award by misrepresentation.
(b) Deemed Certifications. The following actions shall be deemed
affirmative, willful and intentional certifications of 8(a) status:
(1) Submission of a bid or proposal for a Federal grant, contract,
subcontract, cooperative agreement, or cooperative research and
development agreement reserved, set aside, or otherwise classified as
intended for award to 8(a) Participants.
(2) Submission of a bid proposal for a Federal grant, contract,
subcontract, cooperative agreement or cooperative research and
development agreement which in any way encourages a Federal agency to
classify the bid or proposal, if awarded, as an award to an 8(a)
Participant.
(3) Registration on any Federal electronic database for the purpose
of being considered for award of a Federal grant, contract,
subcontract, cooperative agreement, or cooperative research and
development agreement, as an 8(a) Participant.
(c) Signature Requirement. Each solicitation, bid, or application
for a Federal contract, subcontract, or grant shall contain a
certification concerning the 8(a) status of a business concern seeking
the Federal contract, subcontract or grant. An authorized official must
sign the certification on the same page containing the 8(a) status
claimed by the concern.
(d) Limitation of Liability. Paragraphs (a)-(c) shall not apply in
the case of unintentional errors or technical malfunctions that
demonstrate that a misrepresentation of 8(a) status was not
affirmative, intentional or willful. Consideration shall be given to
the firm's internal management procedures governing 8(a) representation
or certification, the clarity or ambiguity of the representation or
certification requirement, and the efforts made to correct an incorrect
or invalid representation or certification in a timely manner. In no
case shall an individual or firm be liable for erroneous
representations or certifications made by Government personnel.
9. Add new Sec. 124.1015 to read as follows:
Sec. 124.1015 What are the requirements for representing small
disadvantaged business status, and what are the penalties for
misrepresentation?
(a) Presumption of Loss Based on the Total Amount Expended. In
every contract, subcontract, cooperative agreement, cooperative
research and development agreement, or grant which is set aside,
reserved, or otherwise classified as intended for award to small
disadvantaged business concerns, there shall be an irrefutable
presumption of loss to the United States based on the total amount
expended on the contract, subcontract, cooperative agreement,
cooperative research and development agreement, or grant whenever it is
established that a business concern other than a small disadvantaged
business concern willfully sought and received the award by
misrepresentation.
(b) Deemed Certifications. The following actions shall be deemed
affirmative, willful and intentional certifications of small
disadvantaged business status:
(1) Submission of a bid or proposal for a Federal grant, contract,
subcontract, cooperative agreement, or cooperative research and
development agreement reserved, set aside, or otherwise classified as
intended for award to small disadvantaged business concerns.
(2) Submission of a bid proposal for a Federal grant, contract,
subcontract, cooperative agreement or cooperative research and
development agreement which in any way encourages a Federal agency to
classify the bid or proposal, if awarded, as an award to a small
disadvantaged business concern.
(3) Registration on any Federal electronic database for the purpose
of being considered for award of a Federal grant, contract,
subcontract, cooperative agreement, or cooperative research and
development agreement, as a small disadvantaged business concern.
(c) Signature Requirement. Each solicitation, bid, or application
for a Federal contract, subcontract, or grant shall contain a
certification concerning the small disadvantaged business status of a
business concern seeking the Federal contract, subcontract or grant. An
authorized official must sign the certification on the same page
[[Page 62319]]
containing the small disadvantaged status claimed by the concern.
(d) Limitation of Liability. Paragraphs (a)-(c) shall not apply in
the case of unintentional errors or technical malfunctions that
demonstrate that a misrepresentation of size was not affirmative,
intentional or willful. Consideration shall be given to the firm's
internal management procedures governing SDB representation or
certification, the clarity or ambiguity of the representation or
certification requirement, and the efforts made to correct an incorrect
or invalid representation or certification in a timely manner. In no
case shall an individual or firm be liable for erroneous
representations or certifications made by Government personnel.
(e) Additional Penalties for Misrepresentation.
(1) Suspension or debarment. The SBA debarring official or the
agency debarring official may suspend or debar a person or concern for
misrepresentation pursuant to the procedures set forth in 48 CFR
subpart 9.4.
(2) Civil Penalties. Persons or concerns are subject to severe
penalties under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3729-3733, and under
the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act, 331 U.S.C. 3801-3812, and any
other applicable laws.
(3) Persons or concerns are subject to severe criminal penalties
for knowingly misrepresenting the small disadvantaged business status
of a concern in connection with procurement programs pursuant to
section 16(d) of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 645(d), as amended;
18 U.S.C. 1001; and 31 U.S.C. 3729-3733. Persons or concerns are
subject to criminal penalties for knowingly making false statements or
misrepresentations to SBA for the purpose of influencing any actions of
SBA pursuant to section 16(a) of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C.
645(a), as amended, including failure to correct ``continuing
representations'' that are no longer true.
10. Add new Sec. 124.1016 to read as follows:
Sec. 124.1016 What must a concern do in order to be Identified as a
Small Disadvantaged Business Concern in any Federal procurement
databases?
(a) In order to be identified as a small disadvantaged business
concern in the Online Representations and Certifications Application
(ORCA) database, (or any successor thereto) a concern must certify its
small disadvantaged business status in connection with specific
eligibility requirements at least annually.
(b) If a firm identified as a small disadvantaged business concern
in ORCA fails to certify its status within one year of a status
certification, the firm will not be listed as a small disadvantaged
business concern in ORCA, unless and until the firm recertifies its
small disadvantaged business status.
PART 125--GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING PROGRAMS
11. The authority citation for part 125 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632, 634(b)(6), 637, 644 and 657f.
12. Amend Sec. 125.29 by
a. Revising the section heading;
b. Revising paragraphs (a) through (c); and
c. Adding new paragraphs (d) through (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 125.29 What are the requirements for representing service-
disabled veteran-owned small business status, and what are the
penalties for misrepresentation?
(a) Presumption of Loss Based on the Total Amount Expended. In
every contract, subcontract, cooperative agreement, cooperative
research and development agreement, or grant which is set aside,
reserved, or otherwise classified as intended for award to service-
disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, there shall be an
irrefutable presumption of loss to the United States based on the total
amount expended on the contract, subcontract, cooperative agreement,
cooperative research and development agreement, or grant whenever it is
established that a business concern other than a service-disabled
veteran-owned small business concern willfully sought and received the
award by misrepresentation.
(b) Deemed Certifications. The following actions shall be deemed
affirmative, willful and intentional certifications of service-disabled
veteran-owned small business status:
(1) Submission of a bid or proposal for a Federal grant, contract,
subcontract, cooperative agreement, or cooperative research and
development agreement reserved, set aside, or otherwise classified as
intended for award to service-disabled veteran-owned small business
concerns.
(2) Submission of a bid proposal for a Federal grant, contract,
subcontract, cooperative agreement or cooperative research and
development agreement which in any way encourages a Federal agency to
classify the bid or proposal, if awarded, as an award to a service-
disabled veteran-owned small business concern.
(3) Registration on any Federal electronic database for the purpose
of being considered for award of a Federal grant, contract,
subcontract, cooperative agreement, or cooperative research and
development agreement, as a small disadvantaged business concern.
(c) Signature Requirement. Each solicitation, bid, or application
for a Federal contract, subcontract, or grant shall contain a
certification concerning the service-disabled veteran-owned small
business status of a business concern seeking the Federal contract,
subcontract or grant. An authorized official must sign the
certification on the same page containing the service-disabled veteran-
owned small business status claimed by the concern.
(d) Limitation of Liability. Paragraphs (a)--(c) shall not apply in
the case of unintentional errors or technical malfunctions that
demonstrate that a misrepresentation of service-disabled veteran-owned
small business status was not affirmative, intentional or willful.
Consideration shall be given to the firm's internal management
procedures governing SDVO SBC representation or certification, the
clarity or ambiguity of the representation or certification
requirement, and the efforts made to correct an incorrect or invalid
representation or certification in a timely manner. In no case shall an
individual or firm be liable for erroneous representations or
certifications made by Government personnel.
(e) Additional Penalties for Misrepresentation.
(1) Suspension or debarment. The SBA debarring official or the
agency debarring official may suspend or debar a person or concern for
misrepresentation pursuant to the procedures set forth in 48 CFR
subpart 9.4.
(2) Civil Penalties. Persons or concerns are subject to severe
penalties under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3729-3733, and under
the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act, 331 U.S.C. 3801-3812, and any
other applicable laws.
(3) Persons or concerns are subject to severe criminal penalties
for knowingly misrepresenting the service-disabled veteran-owned status
of a concern in connection with procurement programs pursuant to
section 16(d) of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 645(d), as amended;
18 U.S.C. 1001; and 31 U.S.C. 3729-3733. Persons or concerns are
subject to criminal penalties for knowingly making false statements or
[[Page 62320]]
misrepresentations to SBA for the purpose of influencing any actions of
SBA pursuant to section 16(a) of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C.
645(a), as amended, including failure to correct ``continuing
representations'' that are no longer true.
13. Add new Sec. 125.30 to read as follows:
Sec. 125.30 What must a concern do in order to be identified as a
Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business concern in any Federal
procurement databases?
(a) In order to be identified as a Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned
business concern in the Online Representations and Certifications
Application (ORCA) database (or any successor thereto) a concern must
certify its Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned small business status in
connection with specific eligibility requirements at least annually.
(b) If a firm identified as a Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned small
business concern in ORCA fails to certify its status within one year of
a status certification, the firm will not be listed as a Service-
Disabled Veteran-Owned small business concern in ORCA, unless and until
the firm recertifies its Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned status.
PART 126--HUBZONE PROGRAM
14. The authority citation for part 126 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632 and 657(a).
15. Amend Sec. 126.900 by:
a. Revising the section heading;
b. Revising paragraphs (a)-(c); and
c. Adding new paragraphs (d)-(e) to read as follows:
Sec. 126.900 What are the requirements for representing HUBZone
status, and what are the penalties for misrepresentation?
(a) Presumption of Loss Based on the Total Amount Expended. In
every contract, subcontract, cooperative agreement, cooperative
research and development agreement, or grant which is set aside,
reserved, or otherwise classified as intended for award to HUBZone
small business concerns, there shall be an irrefutable presumption of
loss to the United States based on the total amount expended on the
contract, subcontract, cooperative agreement, cooperative research and
development agreement, or grant whenever it is established that a
business concern other than a HUBZone small business concern willfully
sought and received the award by misrepresentation.
(b) Deemed Certifications. The following actions shall be deemed
affirmative, willful and intentional certifications of HUBZone small
business status:
(1) Submission of a bid or proposal for a Federal grant, contract,
subcontract, cooperative agreement, or cooperative research and
development agreement reserved, set aside, or otherwise classified as
intended for award to HUBZone small business concerns.
(2) Submission of a bid proposal for a Federal grant, contract,
subcontract, cooperative agreement or cooperative research and
development agreement which in any way encourages a Federal agency to
classify the bid or proposal, if awarded, as an award to a HUBZone
small business concern.
(3) Registration on any Federal electronic database for the purpose
of being considered for award of a Federal grant, contract,
subcontract, cooperative agreement, or cooperative research and
development agreement, as a HUBZone small business concern.
(c) Signature Requirement. Each solicitation, bid, or application
for a Federal contract, subcontract, or grant shall contain a
certification concerning the HUBZone small business status of a
business concern seeking the Federal contract, subcontract or grant. An
authorized official must sign the certification on the same page
containing the HUBZone status claimed by the concern.
(d) Limitation of Liability. Paragraphs (a)-(c) shall not apply in
the case of unintentional errors or technical malfunctions that
demonstrate that a misrepresentation of HUBZone status was not
affirmative, intentional or willful. Consideration shall be given to
the firm's internal management procedures governing HUBZone SBC
representation or certification, the clarity or ambiguity of the
representation or certification requirement, and the efforts made to
correct an incorrect or invalid representation or certification in a
timely manner. In no case shall an individual or firm be liable for
erroneous representations or certifications made by Government
personnel.
(e) Additional Penalties for Misrepresentation
(1) Suspension or debarment. The SBA debarring official or the
agency debarring official may suspend or debar a person or concern for
misrepresentation pursuant to the procedures set forth in 48 CFR
subpart 9.4.
(2) Civil Penalties. Persons or concerns are subject to severe
penalties under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3729-3733, and under
the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act, 331 U.S.C. 3801-3812, and any
other applicable laws.
(3) Persons or concerns are subject to severe criminal penalties
for knowingly misrepresenting the HUBZone status of a concern in
connection with procurement programs pursuant to section 16(d) of the
Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 645(d), as amended; 18 U.S.C. 1001; and
31 U.S.C. 3729-3733. Persons or concerns are subject to criminal
penalties for knowingly making false statements or misrepresentations
to SBA for the purpose of influencing any actions of SBA pursuant to
section 16(a) of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 645(a), as amended,
including failure to correct ``continuing representations'' that are no
longer true.
PART 127--WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS FEDERAL CONTRACT PROGRAM
16. The authority citation for part 127 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632, 634(b)(6), 637(m), and 644.
17. Amend Sec. 127.700 by:
a. Revising the section heading;
b. Revising paragraphs (a)-(c); and
c. Adding new paragraphs (d)-(e):
Sec. 127.700 What are the requirements for representing women-owned
small business or economically disadvantaged women-owned small business
status, and what are the penalties for misrepresentation?
(a) Presumption of Loss Based on the Total Amount Expended. In
every contract, subcontract, cooperative agreement, cooperative
research and development agreement, or grant which is set aside,
reserved, or otherwise classified as intended for award to women-owned
small business concerns or economically disadvantaged women-owned small
business concerns, there shall be an irrefutable presumption of loss to
the United States based on the total amount expended on the contract,
subcontract, cooperative agreement, cooperative research and
development agreement, or grant whenever it is established that a
business concern other than a women-owned small business concern or
economically disadvantaged women-owned small business concern willfully
sought and received the award by misrepresentation.
(b) Deemed Certifications. The following actions shall be deemed
affirmative, willful and intentional certifications of women-owned
small business or economically disadvantaged women-owned small business
status:
(1) Submission of a bid or proposal for a Federal grant, contract,
subcontract,
[[Page 62321]]
cooperative agreement, or cooperative research and development
agreement reserved, set aside, or otherwise classified as intended for
award to women-owned small business concerns or economically
disadvantaged women-owned small business concerns.
(2) Submission of a bid proposal for a Federal grant, contract,
subcontract, cooperative agreement or cooperative research and
development agreement which in any way encourages a Federal agency to
classify the bid or proposal, if awarded, as an award to a women-owned
small business concern or economically disadvantaged women-owned small
business concern.
(3) Registration on any Federal electronic database for the purpose
of being considered for award of a Federal grant, contract,
subcontract, cooperative agreement, or cooperative research and
development agreement, as a women-owned small business concern or
economically disadvantaged women-owned small business concern.
(c) Signature Requirement. Each solicitation, bid, or application
for a Federal contract, subcontract, or grant shall contain a
certification concerning the women-owned small business or economically
disadvantaged women-owned small business status of a business concern
seeking the Federal contract, subcontract or grant. An authorized
official must sign the certification on the same page containing the
women-owned small business or economically disadvantaged women-owned
small business status claimed by the concern.
(d) Limitation of Liability. Paragraphs (a)-(c) shall not apply in
the case of unintentional errors or technical malfunctions that
demonstrate that a misrepresentation of women-owned small business or
economically disadvantaged women-owned small business status was not
affirmative, intentional or willful. Consideration shall be given to
the firm's internal management procedures governing WOSB representation
or certification, the clarity or ambiguity of the representation or
certification requirement, and the efforts made to correct an incorrect
or invalid representation or certification in a timely manner. In no
case shall an individual or firm be liable for erroneous
representations or certifications made by Government personnel.
(e) Additional Penalties for Misrepresentation.
(1) Suspension or debarment. The SBA debarring official or the
agency debarring official may suspend or debar a person or concern for
misrepresentation pursuant to the procedures set forth in 48 CFR
subpart 9.4.
(2) Civil Penalties. Persons or concerns are subject to severe
penalties under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3729-3733, and under
the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act, 331 U.S.C. 3801-3812, and any
other applicable laws.
(3) Persons or concerns are subject to severe criminal penalties
for knowingly misrepresenting the women-owned status of a concern in
connection with procurement programs pursuant to section 16(d) of the
Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 645(d), as amended; 18 U.S.C. 1001; and
31 U.S.C. 3729-3733. Persons or concern are subject to criminal
penalties for knowingly making false statements or misrepresentations
to SBA for the purpose of influencing any actions of SBA pursuant to
section 16(a) of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 645(a), as amended,
including failure to correct ``continuing representations'' that are no
longer true.
18. Add new Sec. 127.701 to read as follows:
Sec. 127.701 What must a concern do in order to be identified as a
Women-Owned Small Business concern in any Federal procurement
databases?
(a) In order to be identified as a Women-Owned business concern in
the Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA)
database (or any successor thereto) a concern must certify its Women-
Owned small business status in connection with specific eligibility
requirements at least annually.
(b) If a firm identified as a Women-Owned small business concern in
ORCA fails to certify its status within one year of a status
certification, the firm will not be listed as a Women-Owned small
business concern in ORCA, unless and until the firm recertifies its
Women-Owned status.
Dated: September 26, 2011.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011-25656 Filed 10-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P