Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702), CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705), and CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) Airplanes, 61633-61638 [2011-25571]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 5, 2011 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0994; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–143–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc. Model CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet
Series 700, 701, & 702), CL–600–2D15
(Regional Jet Series 705), and CL–600–
2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900)
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above that would
supersede an existing AD. This
proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify
and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes
the unsafe condition as:
SUMMARY:
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
The right-hand inboard main landing gear
(MLG) door of a CRJ 700 departed the aircraft
during the landing phase of flight. The door
damaged the trailing edge flap and punctured
the rear fuselage near the floor level. The
aircraft landed safely. Preliminary
investigation indicates the failure was
initiated by fatigue of the panel structure
near a panel hinge lug. Loss of the main
landing gear door during flight could result
in damage to the aircraft and injury to
persons on the ground.
*
*
*
*
*
The proposed AD would require actions
that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by November 21,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:06 Oct 04, 2011
Jkt 226001
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Bombardier,
ˆ
Inc., 400 Cote-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
´
Quebec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone
514–855–5000; fax 514–855–7401;
e-mail thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com;
Internet https://www.bombardier.com.
You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel Parrillo, Program Manager,
Continuing Operational Safety, FAA,
New York Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, New York 11590; telephone
516–228–7300; fax (516) 794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2011–0994; Directorate Identifier
2010–NM–143–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On June 28, 2006, we issued AD
2006–14–05, Amendment 39–14676 (71
FR 38979, July 11, 2006). That AD
required actions intended to address an
unsafe condition on the products listed
above.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
61633
Since we issued AD 2006–14–05,
Amendment 39–14676 (71 FR 38979,
July 11, 2006), we have determined it is
necessary to require a new modification
of the MLG door configuration. We have
also removed airplanes equipped with
the new MLG door during production
from the applicability of this NPRM.
Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA), which is the aviation authority
for Canada, has issued Canadian
Airworthiness Directive CF–2003–23R3,
dated May 21, 2010 (referred to after
this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states:
The right-hand inboard main landing gear
(MLG) door of a CRJ 700 departed the aircraft
during the landing phase of flight. The door
damaged the trailing edge flap and punctured
the rear fuselage near the floor level. The
aircraft landed safely. Preliminary
investigation indicates the failure was
initiated by fatigue of the panel structure
near a panel hinge lug. Loss of the main
landing gear door during flight could result
in damage to the aircraft and injury to
persons on the ground.
Subsequent to the issuance of Revision 1
of this directive, Transport Canada (TC)
approved an alternate means of compliance
(AMOC), AARDG 2004/A007, to allow
extension of the repeat inspection interval
when inboard MLG doors have incorporated
certain repairs or modifications.
Subsequent to the issuance of the TC
AMOC AARDG 2004/A007, an inboard MLG
door departed from an aircraft operating
under an AMOC equivalent to TC AMOC
AARDG 2004/007. As a result of this
incident, this directive was revised to
Revision 2 to introduce additional inspection
requirements according to Bombardier Alert
Service Bulletin A670–32–016. In addition,
Revision 2 also eliminated escalation of the
repeat inspection interval allowed in TC
AMOC AARDG 2004/007 and revised the
aircraft applicability to add a new aircraft
model.
Since the issuance of Revision 2 of this
directive, TC approved an AMOC, AARDG
2006–A051, to allow the installation of a new
modified MLG door configuration and to
perform alternative inspection. Service
history shows that this new modified MLG
door configuration resolves the safety
concerns associated with this directive.
Revision 3 of this directive mandates the
incorporation of the new modified MLG door
configuration in accordance with Bombardier
Aerospace Service Bulletin (SB) 670BA–32–
017 as the terminating action. In addition,
this revision restricts the applicability to
aircraft not equipped with the new modified
MLG door configuration at delivery.
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
We have also revised paragraph (j)(2)
of this NPRM to remove reference to
Task Cards 32–12–01–000–801–A01 and
32–12–01–400–801–A01 of the
Bombardier CRJ 700/900 Series Regional
Jet Aircraft Maintenance Manual. We
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
61634
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 5, 2011 / Proposed Rules
added Note 2 to this NPRM to refer to
these tasks cards as additional sources
of guidance for replacing the lower
panel assembly. Operators may contact
the International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
for information regarding the use of the
task cards for replacing the lower panel
assembly, as required by paragraph (j)(2)
of this AD.
Relevant Service Information
Bombardier has issued Alert Service
Bulletin A670BA–32–016, Revision F,
dated May 14, 2010, including
Appendices A and B, dated June 2,
2005; and Service Bulletin 670BA–32–
017, Revision C, dated May 14, 2010.
The actions described in this service
information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the
MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have proposed
different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the
proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 220 products of U.S.
registry.
The actions that are required by AD
2006–14–05, Amendment 39–14676 (71
FR 38979, July 11, 2006), and retained
in this proposed AD take about 3 work-
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:06 Oct 04, 2011
Jkt 226001
hours per product, at an average labor
rate of $85 per work hour. Based on
these figures, the estimated cost of the
currently required actions is $255 per
product.
We estimate that it would take about
115 work-hours per product to comply
with the new basic requirements of this
proposed AD. The average labor rate is
$85 per work-hour. Required parts
would cost about $0 per product. Where
the service information lists required
parts costs that are covered under
warranty, we have assumed that there
will be no charge for these costs. As we
do not control warranty coverage for
affected parties, some parties may incur
costs higher than estimated here. Based
on these figures, we estimate the cost of
the proposed AD on U.S. operators to be
$2,150,500, or $9,775 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Amendment 39–14676 (71 FR
38979, July 11, 2006) and adding the
following new AD:
Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA–2011–
0994; Directorate Identifier 2010–NM–
143–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by
November 21, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2006–14–05,
Amendment 39–14676 (71 FR 38979, July 11,
2006).
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc.
Model CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700,
701, & 702) airplanes having serial numbers
(S/Ns) 10003 through 10230 inclusive; and
Model CL–600–2D15 (Regional Jet Series
705) airplanes; and Model CL–600–2D24
(Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes having S/
Ns 15001 through 15053 inclusive, 15055,
and 15056; certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 32: Landing gear.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
The right-hand inboard main landing gear
(MLG) door of a CRJ 700 departed the aircraft
during the landing phase of flight. The door
damaged the trailing edge flap and punctured
the rear fuselage near the floor level. The
aircraft landed safely. Preliminary
investigation indicates the failure was
initiated by fatigue of the panel structure
near a panel hinge lug. Loss of the main
landing gear door during flight could result
in damage to the aircraft and injury to
persons on the ground.
*
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
*
*
05OCP1
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 5, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Restatement of Requirements of AD 2003–
19–51, Amendment 39–13353 (68 FR 61615,
October 29, 2003), With Revised Serial
Numbers and Service Information
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Initial Compliance Time
(g) For Model CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet
series 700 & 701) series airplanes, S/Ns 10003
through 10230 inclusive; and Model CL–600–
2D24 (Regional Jet series 900) series
airplanes, S/Ns 15002 through 15053
inclusive, 15055, and 15056: Perform the
initial inspection specified in paragraph (h)
of this AD at the applicable time specified in
paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD.
(1) For airplanes with fewer than 1,500
total flight cycles as of November 3, 2003 (the
effective date of AD 2003–19–51,
Amendment 39–13353 (68 FR 61615, October
29, 2003)): Do the inspections before the
accumulation of 1,050 total flight cycles, or
within 50 flight cycles after August 15, 2006
(the effective date of AD 2006–14–05,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:06 Oct 04, 2011
Jkt 226001
Amendment 39–14676 (71 FR 38979, July 11,
2006)), whichever is later.
(2) For airplanes with 1,500 or more total
flight cycles as of November 3, 2003: Do the
inspections within 10 flight cycles after
August 15, 2006.
Inspections
(h) For Model CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet
series 700 & 701) series airplanes, S/Ns 10003
through 10230 inclusive; and Model CL–600–
2D24 (Regional Jet series 900) series
airplanes, S/Ns 15002 through 15053
inclusive, 15055 and 15056: At the
applicable time specified in paragraph (g) of
this AD, perform detailed inspections of the
lower panel, part number (P/N) CC670–
10520, of the left- and right-hand MLG doors
for the conditions and in the areas specified
in paragraphs (h)(1), (h)(2), (h)(3), and (h)(4)
of this AD; and Figures 1, 2, and 3 of this AD.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a
detailed inspection is defined as: ‘‘An
intensive visual examination of a specific
structural area, system, installation, or
assembly to detect damage, failure, or
irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at intensity deemed appropriate by
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror,
magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface
cleaning and elaborate access procedures
may be required.’’
(1) Inspect the cross member, P/N CC670–
10572, of the MLG door lower panel for
cracking or deformation, in accordance with
Figure 2 of this AD.
(2) Inspect the inner skin, P/N CC670–
10577, of the MLG door lower panel at the
cross member (P/N CC670–10572) for
cracking or deformation, or pulled or missing
fasteners, in accordance with Figure 2 of this
AD.
(3) Inspect the outer skin, P/N CC670–
10574, of the MLG door lower panel at the
cross member (P/N CC670–10572) for
cracking or deformation, or pulled or missing
fasteners, in accordance with Figure 2 of this
AD.
(4) Inspect the forward member, P/N
CC670–10570, and aft member, P/N CC670–
10571, of the MLG door lower panel for
cracking or deformation, or pulled or missing
fasteners, in accordance with Figure 3 of this
AD. Figures 1 through 3 of this AD follow.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
EP05OC11.015
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
61635
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 4910–13–C
Corrective Actions
Repetitive Inspections
(j) If any cracking or deformation, or pulled
or missing fastener, as applicable, is found
during any inspection done in accordance
with paragraph (h) or (i) of this AD: Before
further flight, accomplish paragraph (j)(1),
(j)(2), or (j)(3) of this AD.
(1) Repair the damage in accordance with
a method approved by either the Manager,
New York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
(i) If no cracking or deformation, or pulled
or missing fastener, as applicable, is found
during any inspection required by paragraph
(h) or (i) of this AD, repeat the inspections
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 100 flight
cycles.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:06 Oct 04, 2011
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA) (or its delegated agent); and
accomplish repetitive inspections in
accordance with a method and at a repetitive
interval approved by same.
(2) Replace the lower panel assembly, P/N
CC670–10520, of the affected MLG door with
a new or serviceable lower panel assembly
having the same P/N, according to a method
approved by either the Manager, New York
ACO, FAA; or TCCA (or its delegated agent).
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
EP05OC11.017
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 5, 2011 / Proposed Rules
EP05OC11.016
61636
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 5, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Repeat the inspections specified in paragraph
(h) of this AD at intervals not to exceed 100
flight cycles.
Note 2: For guidance on replacing the
lower panel assembly, refer to Task Cards
32–12–01–000–801–A01 and 32–12–01–400–
801–A01 of the Bombardier CRJ 700/900
Series Regional Jet Aircraft Maintenance
Manual.
(3) Remove the lower panel assembly, P/N
CC670–10520, of the affected MLG door, and
accomplish paragraph (j)(3)(i) or (j)(3)(ii) of
this AD, as applicable.
(i) For Model CL600–2C10 (Regional Jet
series 700 & 701) series airplanes: Revise the
Configuration Deviation List (CDL),
Appendix 1, of the airplane flight manual
(AFM), to include the following limitations.
This may be accomplished by inserting a
copy of this AD into the CDL of the AFM.
‘‘For Model CL600–2C10 series airplanes:
If one or both door panel assemblies, part
number CC670–10520, is missing:
(1) Take-off Weight is reduced by 202.5 kg/
door, or 450 lb/door.
(2) Enroute Climb Weight is reduced by
445.5 kg/door, or 990 lb/door.
(3) Landing Weight is reduced by 202.5 kg/
door, or 450 lb/door.
(4) Fuel Consumption is increased by
+3.42% on fuel used/door.
(5) Cruise Airspeed is limited to not more
than 0.78 Mach.’’
(ii) For Model CL–600–2D24 (Regional Jet
series 900) series airplanes: Revise the CDL,
Appendix 1, of the AFM, to include the
following limitations. This may be
accomplished by inserting a copy of this AD
into the CDL of the AFM.
‘‘For Model CL600–2D24 series airplanes:
If one or both door panel assemblies, part
number CC670–10520, is missing:
(1) Take-off Weight is reduced by 245 kg/
door, or 540 lb/door.
(2) Enroute Climb Weight is reduced by
551 kg/door, or 1,215 lb/door.
(3) Landing Weight is reduced by 245 kg/
door, or 540 lb/door.
(4) Fuel Consumption is increased by
+3.42% on fuel used/door.
(5) Cruise Airspeed is limited to not more
than 0.78 Mach.’’
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Restatement of Requirements of AD 2006–
14–05, Amendment 39–14676 (71 FR 38979,
July 11, 2006), With Revised Service
Information:
Inboard MLG Door Inspections
(k) For all airplanes on which an
inspection has not been done in accordance
with paragraph (h) of this AD on or before
August 15, 2006: At the applicable time
specified in paragraph (k)(1) or (k)(2) of this
AD, do the inspections of the left- and righthand inboard MLG doors for damage, in
accordance with Part A of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–32–016,
Revision A, dated June 7, 2005, excluding
Appendix A, dated June 2, 2005, and
including Appendix B, dated June 2, 2005; or
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–
32–016, Revision F, dated May 14, 2010,
excluding Appendix A, dated June 2, 2005,
and including Appendix B, dated June 2,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:06 Oct 04, 2011
Jkt 226001
2005. Doing the inspections required by this
paragraph terminates the actions required by
paragraphs (g) through (j) of this AD. As of
the effective date of this AD, use only
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–
32–016, Revision F, dated May 14, 2010.
(1) For airplanes that have accumulated
fewer than 1,500 total flight cycles as of
August 15, 2006: Before the accumulation of
1,000 total flight cycles, or within 50 flight
cycles after August 15, 2006, whichever
occurs later.
(2) For airplanes that have accumulated
1,500 flight cycles or more as of August 15,
2006: Within 10 flight cycles after August 15,
2006.
(l) For airplanes on which an inspection
has been done in accordance with paragraph
(h) of this AD on or before August 15, 2006:
At the applicable time specified in paragraph
(l)(1) or (l)(2) of this AD, inspect installed
door(s) as specified in paragraph (k) of this
AD. Doing the inspections required by this
paragraph terminates the actions required by
paragraphs (g) through (j) of this AD.
(1) For airplanes that are not subject to an
approved alternative method of compliance
(AMOC) that extends the inspection interval
to 450 flight cycles: Within 100 flight cycles
since the last inspection done in accordance
with paragraph (h) of this AD.
(2) For airplanes that are subject to an
approved AMOC that extends the inspection
interval to 450 flight cycles: At the earlier of
the times specified in paragraphs (l)(2)(i) and
(l)(2)(ii) of this AD:
(i) Within 450 flight cycles since the last
inspection done in accordance with
paragraph (h) of this AD.
(ii) Within 100 flight cycles since the last
inspection done in accordance with
paragraph (h) of this AD, or within 50 cycles
after August 15, 2006, whichever occurs
later.
(m) If no damage is found during any
inspection done in accordance with
paragraph (k) of this AD, repeat the
inspections specified in paragraph (k) of this
AD thereafter at intervals not to exceed 100
flight cycles.
Corrective Action—Replace or Remove MLG
Door
(n) If any damage is found during any
inspection done in accordance with
paragraph (k) of this AD, before further flight,
do the actions in paragraph (n)(1) or (n)(2) of
this AD. Repeat the inspections specified in
paragraph (k) of this AD thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 100 flight cycles.
(1) Replace the inboard MLG door with a
new or repaired door in accordance with Part
B of the Accomplishment Instructions of the
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–
32–016, Revision A, dated June 7, 2005,
excluding Appendix A, dated June 2, 2005,
and including Appendix B, dated June 2,
2005; or Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin
A670BA–32–016, Revision F, dated May 14,
2010, excluding Appendix A, dated June 2,
2005, and including Appendix B, dated June
2, 2005; except where those service bulletins
specify to contact the manufacturer for repair
if no generic repair engineering order (REO)
is available, before further flight, repair using
a method approved by either the Manager,
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
61637
New York ACO, FAA; or TCCA (or its
delegated agent). As of the effective date of
this AD, use only Bombardier Alert Service
Bulletin A670BA–32–016, Revision F, dated
May 14, 2010.
(2) Remove the inboard MLG door in
accordance with Part B of the
Accomplishment Instructions of the
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–
32–016, Revision A, dated June 7, 2005,
excluding Appendix A, dated June 2, 2005,
and including Appendix B, dated June 2,
2005; or Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin
A670BA–32–016, Revision F, dated May 14,
2010, excluding Appendix A, dated June 2,
2005, and including Appendix B, dated June
2, 2005; and accomplish paragraph (n)(2)(i)
or (n)(2)(ii) of this AD, as applicable. As of
the effective date of this AD, use only
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA–
32–016, Revision F, dated May 14, 2010.
(i) For Model CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet
Series 700, 701, & 702) airplanes and Model
CL–600–2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705)
airplanes: Revise the Configuration Deviation
List (CDL), Appendix 1, of the Bombardier
Canadair Regional Jet AFM, to include the
following limitations. This may be
accomplished by inserting a copy of this AD
into the CDL of the AFM. Remove any
existing CDL limitation required by
paragraph (j)(3)(i) of this AD from the AFM.
‘‘For Model CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet
Series 700, 701, & 702) airplanes and Model
CL–600–2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705)
airplanes: If one or both door panel
assemblies, part number CC670–10520, is
missing:
(1) Take-off Weight is reduced by 202.5 kg/
door, or 450 lb/door.
(2) Enroute Climb Weight is reduced by
445.5 kg/door, or 990 lb/door.
(3) Landing Weight is reduced by 202.5 kg/
door, or 450 lb/door.
(4) Fuel Consumption is increased by
+2.5% on fuel used/door.
(5) Cruise Airspeed is limited to not more
than 0.78 Mach.
(6) The climb ceiling obtained from the
Flight Planning and Cruise Control Manual
(FPCCM) must be reduced by 1,000 ft/door.’’
Note 3: When a statement with the
information specified in paragraph (n)(2)(i) of
this AD has been included in the general
revisions of the AFM, the general revisions
may be inserted into the AFM, and the copy
of this AD may be removed from the AFM.
(ii) For Model CL–600–2D24 (Regional Jet
Series 900) airplanes: Revise the CDL,
Appendix 1, of the Bombardier Canadair
Regional Jet AFM, to include the following
limitations. This may be accomplished by
inserting a copy of this AD into the CDL of
the AFM. Remove any existing CDL
limitation required by paragraph (j)(3)(ii) of
this AD from the AFM.
‘‘For Model CL–600–2D24 (Regional Jet
Series 900) airplanes: If one or both door
panel assemblies, part number CC670–10520,
is missing:
(1) Take-off Weight is reduced by 245 kg/
door, or 540 lb/door.
(2) Enroute Climb Weight is reduced by
551 kg/door, or 1,215 lb/door.
(3) Landing Weight is reduced by 245 kg/
door, or 540 lb/door.
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
61638
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 5, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(4) Fuel Consumption is increased by
+2.5% on fuel used/door.
(5) Cruise Airspeed is limited to not more
than 0.78 Mach.
(6) The climb ceiling obtained from the
Flight Planning and Cruise Control Manual
(FPCCM) must be reduced by 1,000 ft/door.’’
Note 4: When a statement with the
information specified in paragraph (n)(2)(ii)
of this AD has been included in the general
revisions of the AFM, the general revisions
may be inserted into the AFM, and the copy
of this AD may be removed from the AFM.
Revise CDL
(o) For airplanes on which the door(s) have
been removed in accordance with paragraph
(j)(3) of this AD: Within 30 days after August
15, 2006, do the revision specified in
paragraph (n)(2)(i) or (n)(2)(ii) of this AD, as
applicable, and remove any revision required
by paragraph (j)(3)(i) or (j)(3)(ii) of this AD.
No Reporting Required
(p) Although Bombardier Alert Service
Bulletin A670BA–32–016, Revision A, dated
June 7, 2005, excluding Appendix A, dated
June 2, 2005, and including Appendix B,
dated June 2, 2005; and Revision F, dated
May 14, 2010, excluding Appendix A, dated
June 2, 2005, and including Appendix B,
dated June 2, 2005; specify to submit certain
information to the manufacturer, this AD
does not include that requirement.
Actions Accomplished According to
Previous Issue of Service Bulletin
(q) Actions accomplished before August
15, 2006, according to Bombardier Alert
Service Bulletin A670BA–32–016, dated June
2, 2005, are considered acceptable for
compliance with the corresponding actions
of this AD.
New Requirements of This AD
Terminating Modification for MLG Door
Configuration
(r) Within 6,000 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, modify the MLG
door, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 670BA–32–017, Revision C,
dated May 14, 2010. Doing this modification
terminates the requirements of this AD.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Credit for Actions Accomplished in
Accordance With Previous Service
Information
(s) Modifying the MLG door before the
effective date of this AD, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA–32–017,
dated July 24, 2006; Revision A, dated
September 26, 2006; or Revision B, dated July
31, 2008; as applicable; is considered
acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of paragraph (r) of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Other FAA AD Provisions
(t) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
16:06 Oct 04, 2011
Jkt 226001
Related Information
(u) Refer to MCAI TCCA Airworthiness
Directive CF–2003–23R3, dated May 21,
2010; Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin
A670BA–32–016, Revision F, dated May 14,
2010, excluding Appendix A, dated June 2,
2005, and including Appendix B, dated June
2, 2005; and Bombardier Service Bulletin
670BA–32–017, Revision C, dated May 14,
2010; for related information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 22, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–25571 Filed 10–4–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0995; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–243–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; 328 Support
Services GmbH (Type Certificate
Previously Held by AvCraft Aerospace
GmbH; Fairchild Dornier GmbH;
Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH) Model 328–
100 and 328–300 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
Note 5: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York ACO,
ANE–170, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Program Manager,
Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New
York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, New York 11590; telephone 516–
228–7300; fax 516–794–5531. Before using
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD. AMOCs
approved previously in accordance with AD
2006–14–05, Amendment 39–14676 (71 FR
38979, July 11, 2006), are acceptable for
compliance with this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
Based on in-service experience, the System
Safety Analyses for the Flight Controls have
been reviewed and their conclusions have
been accepted during the latest Candidate
Maintenance Coordination Committee
meeting.
This review resulted in reduced inspection
intervals, specifically for the flight controls
tab-to-actuator linkage [certification
maintenance requirements] CMR** repetitive
inspections, which have been identified as
mandatory actions for continued
airworthiness.
Failure of these components or their
constituent parts could lead to reduced
control of the aeroplane.
*
*
*
*
*
The proposed AD would require actions
that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by November 21,
2011.
You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–40, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact 328 Support
Services GmbH, Global Support Center,
P.O. Box 1252, D–82231 Wessling,
Federal Republic of Germany;
telephone: +49 8153 88111 6666; fax:
+49 8153 88111 6565; e-mail:
gsc.op@328support.de; Internet: https://
www.328support.de. You may review
copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
ADDRESSES:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 5, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 61633-61638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25571]
[[Page 61633]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2011-0994; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-143-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10
(Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702), CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series
705), and CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above that would supersede an existing AD. This
proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to
identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The
MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
The right-hand inboard main landing gear (MLG) door of a CRJ 700
departed the aircraft during the landing phase of flight. The door
damaged the trailing edge flap and punctured the rear fuselage near
the floor level. The aircraft landed safely. Preliminary
investigation indicates the failure was initiated by fatigue of the
panel structure near a panel hinge lug. Loss of the main landing
gear door during flight could result in damage to the aircraft and
injury to persons on the ground.
* * * * *
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 21,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 514-855-5000; fax 514-855-7401; e-mail
thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://www.bombardier.com. You
may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Parrillo, Program Manager,
Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590;
telephone 516-228-7300; fax (516) 794-5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-0994;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-143-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On June 28, 2006, we issued AD 2006-14-05, Amendment 39-14676 (71
FR 38979, July 11, 2006). That AD required actions intended to address
an unsafe condition on the products listed above.
Since we issued AD 2006-14-05, Amendment 39-14676 (71 FR 38979,
July 11, 2006), we have determined it is necessary to require a new
modification of the MLG door configuration. We have also removed
airplanes equipped with the new MLG door during production from the
applicability of this NPRM. Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA),
which is the aviation authority for Canada, has issued Canadian
Airworthiness Directive CF-2003-23R3, dated May 21, 2010 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
The right-hand inboard main landing gear (MLG) door of a CRJ 700
departed the aircraft during the landing phase of flight. The door
damaged the trailing edge flap and punctured the rear fuselage near
the floor level. The aircraft landed safely. Preliminary
investigation indicates the failure was initiated by fatigue of the
panel structure near a panel hinge lug. Loss of the main landing
gear door during flight could result in damage to the aircraft and
injury to persons on the ground.
Subsequent to the issuance of Revision 1 of this directive,
Transport Canada (TC) approved an alternate means of compliance
(AMOC), AARDG 2004/A007, to allow extension of the repeat inspection
interval when inboard MLG doors have incorporated certain repairs or
modifications.
Subsequent to the issuance of the TC AMOC AARDG 2004/A007, an
inboard MLG door departed from an aircraft operating under an AMOC
equivalent to TC AMOC AARDG 2004/007. As a result of this incident,
this directive was revised to Revision 2 to introduce additional
inspection requirements according to Bombardier Alert Service
Bulletin A670-32-016. In addition, Revision 2 also eliminated
escalation of the repeat inspection interval allowed in TC AMOC
AARDG 2004/007 and revised the aircraft applicability to add a new
aircraft model.
Since the issuance of Revision 2 of this directive, TC approved
an AMOC, AARDG 2006-A051, to allow the installation of a new
modified MLG door configuration and to perform alternative
inspection. Service history shows that this new modified MLG door
configuration resolves the safety concerns associated with this
directive.
Revision 3 of this directive mandates the incorporation of the
new modified MLG door configuration in accordance with Bombardier
Aerospace Service Bulletin (SB) 670BA-32-017 as the terminating
action. In addition, this revision restricts the applicability to
aircraft not equipped with the new modified MLG door configuration
at delivery.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
We have also revised paragraph (j)(2) of this NPRM to remove
reference to Task Cards 32-12-01-000-801-A01 and 32-12-01-400-801-A01
of the Bombardier CRJ 700/900 Series Regional Jet Aircraft Maintenance
Manual. We
[[Page 61634]]
added Note 2 to this NPRM to refer to these tasks cards as additional
sources of guidance for replacing the lower panel assembly. Operators
may contact the International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, for information regarding the use of the task cards
for replacing the lower panel assembly, as required by paragraph (j)(2)
of this AD.
Relevant Service Information
Bombardier has issued Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-32-016,
Revision F, dated May 14, 2010, including Appendices A and B, dated
June 2, 2005; and Service Bulletin 670BA-32-017, Revision C, dated May
14, 2010. The actions described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 220 products of U.S. registry.
The actions that are required by AD 2006-14-05, Amendment 39-14676
(71 FR 38979, July 11, 2006), and retained in this proposed AD take
about 3 work-hours per product, at an average labor rate of $85 per
work hour. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the currently
required actions is $255 per product.
We estimate that it would take about 115 work-hours per product to
comply with the new basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost about $0 per
product. Where the service information lists required parts costs that
are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no
charge for these costs. As we do not control warranty coverage for
affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated
here. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD
on U.S. operators to be $2,150,500, or $9,775 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Amendment 39-14676 (71 FR
38979, July 11, 2006) and adding the following new AD:
Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2011-0994; Directorate Identifier
2010-NM-143-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by November 21, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2006-14-05, Amendment 39-14676 (71 FR
38979, July 11, 2006).
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10
(Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702) airplanes having serial
numbers (S/Ns) 10003 through 10230 inclusive; and Model CL-600-2D15
(Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes; and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional
Jet Series 900) airplanes having S/Ns 15001 through 15053 inclusive,
15055, and 15056; certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32: Landing
gear.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
The right-hand inboard main landing gear (MLG) door of a CRJ 700
departed the aircraft during the landing phase of flight. The door
damaged the trailing edge flap and punctured the rear fuselage near
the floor level. The aircraft landed safely. Preliminary
investigation indicates the failure was initiated by fatigue of the
panel structure near a panel hinge lug. Loss of the main landing
gear door during flight could result in damage to the aircraft and
injury to persons on the ground.
* * * * *
[[Page 61635]]
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Restatement of Requirements of AD 2003-19-51, Amendment 39-13353 (68 FR
61615, October 29, 2003), With Revised Serial Numbers and Service
Information
Initial Compliance Time
(g) For Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet series 700 & 701) series
airplanes, S/Ns 10003 through 10230 inclusive; and Model CL-600-2D24
(Regional Jet series 900) series airplanes, S/Ns 15002 through 15053
inclusive, 15055, and 15056: Perform the initial inspection
specified in paragraph (h) of this AD at the applicable time
specified in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD.
(1) For airplanes with fewer than 1,500 total flight cycles as
of November 3, 2003 (the effective date of AD 2003-19-51, Amendment
39-13353 (68 FR 61615, October 29, 2003)): Do the inspections before
the accumulation of 1,050 total flight cycles, or within 50 flight
cycles after August 15, 2006 (the effective date of AD 2006-14-05,
Amendment 39-14676 (71 FR 38979, July 11, 2006)), whichever is
later.
(2) For airplanes with 1,500 or more total flight cycles as of
November 3, 2003: Do the inspections within 10 flight cycles after
August 15, 2006.
Inspections
(h) For Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet series 700 & 701) series
airplanes, S/Ns 10003 through 10230 inclusive; and Model CL-600-2D24
(Regional Jet series 900) series airplanes, S/Ns 15002 through 15053
inclusive, 15055 and 15056: At the applicable time specified in
paragraph (g) of this AD, perform detailed inspections of the lower
panel, part number (P/N) CC670-10520, of the left- and right-hand
MLG doors for the conditions and in the areas specified in
paragraphs (h)(1), (h)(2), (h)(3), and (h)(4) of this AD; and
Figures 1, 2, and 3 of this AD.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is
defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a specific
structural area, system, installation, or assembly to detect damage,
failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at intensity
deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror,
magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning and elaborate
access procedures may be required.''
(1) Inspect the cross member, P/N CC670-10572, of the MLG door
lower panel for cracking or deformation, in accordance with Figure 2
of this AD.
(2) Inspect the inner skin, P/N CC670-10577, of the MLG door
lower panel at the cross member (P/N CC670-10572) for cracking or
deformation, or pulled or missing fasteners, in accordance with
Figure 2 of this AD.
(3) Inspect the outer skin, P/N CC670-10574, of the MLG door
lower panel at the cross member (P/N CC670-10572) for cracking or
deformation, or pulled or missing fasteners, in accordance with
Figure 2 of this AD.
(4) Inspect the forward member, P/N CC670-10570, and aft member,
P/N CC670-10571, of the MLG door lower panel for cracking or
deformation, or pulled or missing fasteners, in accordance with
Figure 3 of this AD. Figures 1 through 3 of this AD follow.
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP05OC11.015
[[Page 61636]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP05OC11.016
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP05OC11.017
BILLING CODE 4910-13-C
Repetitive Inspections
(i) If no cracking or deformation, or pulled or missing
fastener, as applicable, is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (h) or (i) of this AD, repeat the inspections thereafter
at intervals not to exceed 100 flight cycles.
Corrective Actions
(j) If any cracking or deformation, or pulled or missing
fastener, as applicable, is found during any inspection done in
accordance with paragraph (h) or (i) of this AD: Before further
flight, accomplish paragraph (j)(1), (j)(2), or (j)(3) of this AD.
(1) Repair the damage in accordance with a method approved by
either the Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA) (or its delegated
agent); and accomplish repetitive inspections in accordance with a
method and at a repetitive interval approved by same.
(2) Replace the lower panel assembly, P/N CC670-10520, of the
affected MLG door with a new or serviceable lower panel assembly
having the same P/N, according to a method approved by either the
Manager, New York ACO, FAA; or TCCA (or its delegated agent).
[[Page 61637]]
Repeat the inspections specified in paragraph (h) of this AD at
intervals not to exceed 100 flight cycles.
Note 2: For guidance on replacing the lower panel assembly,
refer to Task Cards 32-12-01-000-801-A01 and 32-12-01-400-801-A01 of
the Bombardier CRJ 700/900 Series Regional Jet Aircraft Maintenance
Manual.
(3) Remove the lower panel assembly, P/N CC670-10520, of the
affected MLG door, and accomplish paragraph (j)(3)(i) or (j)(3)(ii)
of this AD, as applicable.
(i) For Model CL600-2C10 (Regional Jet series 700 & 701) series
airplanes: Revise the Configuration Deviation List (CDL), Appendix
1, of the airplane flight manual (AFM), to include the following
limitations. This may be accomplished by inserting a copy of this AD
into the CDL of the AFM.
``For Model CL600-2C10 series airplanes: If one or both door
panel assemblies, part number CC670-10520, is missing:
(1) Take-off Weight is reduced by 202.5 kg/door, or 450 lb/door.
(2) Enroute Climb Weight is reduced by 445.5 kg/door, or 990 lb/
door.
(3) Landing Weight is reduced by 202.5 kg/door, or 450 lb/door.
(4) Fuel Consumption is increased by +3.42% on fuel used/door.
(5) Cruise Airspeed is limited to not more than 0.78 Mach.''
(ii) For Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet series 900) series
airplanes: Revise the CDL, Appendix 1, of the AFM, to include the
following limitations. This may be accomplished by inserting a copy
of this AD into the CDL of the AFM.
``For Model CL600-2D24 series airplanes: If one or both door
panel assemblies, part number CC670-10520, is missing:
(1) Take-off Weight is reduced by 245 kg/door, or 540 lb/door.
(2) Enroute Climb Weight is reduced by 551 kg/door, or 1,215 lb/
door.
(3) Landing Weight is reduced by 245 kg/door, or 540 lb/door.
(4) Fuel Consumption is increased by +3.42% on fuel used/door.
(5) Cruise Airspeed is limited to not more than 0.78 Mach.''
Restatement of Requirements of AD 2006-14-05, Amendment 39-14676 (71 FR
38979, July 11, 2006), With Revised Service Information:
Inboard MLG Door Inspections
(k) For all airplanes on which an inspection has not been done
in accordance with paragraph (h) of this AD on or before August 15,
2006: At the applicable time specified in paragraph (k)(1) or (k)(2)
of this AD, do the inspections of the left- and right-hand inboard
MLG doors for damage, in accordance with Part A of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin
A670BA-32-016, Revision A, dated June 7, 2005, excluding Appendix A,
dated June 2, 2005, and including Appendix B, dated June 2, 2005; or
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-32-016, Revision F, dated
May 14, 2010, excluding Appendix A, dated June 2, 2005, and
including Appendix B, dated June 2, 2005. Doing the inspections
required by this paragraph terminates the actions required by
paragraphs (g) through (j) of this AD. As of the effective date of
this AD, use only Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-32-016,
Revision F, dated May 14, 2010.
(1) For airplanes that have accumulated fewer than 1,500 total
flight cycles as of August 15, 2006: Before the accumulation of
1,000 total flight cycles, or within 50 flight cycles after August
15, 2006, whichever occurs later.
(2) For airplanes that have accumulated 1,500 flight cycles or
more as of August 15, 2006: Within 10 flight cycles after August 15,
2006.
(l) For airplanes on which an inspection has been done in
accordance with paragraph (h) of this AD on or before August 15,
2006: At the applicable time specified in paragraph (l)(1) or (l)(2)
of this AD, inspect installed door(s) as specified in paragraph (k)
of this AD. Doing the inspections required by this paragraph
terminates the actions required by paragraphs (g) through (j) of
this AD.
(1) For airplanes that are not subject to an approved
alternative method of compliance (AMOC) that extends the inspection
interval to 450 flight cycles: Within 100 flight cycles since the
last inspection done in accordance with paragraph (h) of this AD.
(2) For airplanes that are subject to an approved AMOC that
extends the inspection interval to 450 flight cycles: At the earlier
of the times specified in paragraphs (l)(2)(i) and (l)(2)(ii) of
this AD:
(i) Within 450 flight cycles since the last inspection done in
accordance with paragraph (h) of this AD.
(ii) Within 100 flight cycles since the last inspection done in
accordance with paragraph (h) of this AD, or within 50 cycles after
August 15, 2006, whichever occurs later.
(m) If no damage is found during any inspection done in
accordance with paragraph (k) of this AD, repeat the inspections
specified in paragraph (k) of this AD thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 100 flight cycles.
Corrective Action--Replace or Remove MLG Door
(n) If any damage is found during any inspection done in
accordance with paragraph (k) of this AD, before further flight, do
the actions in paragraph (n)(1) or (n)(2) of this AD. Repeat the
inspections specified in paragraph (k) of this AD thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 100 flight cycles.
(1) Replace the inboard MLG door with a new or repaired door in
accordance with Part B of the Accomplishment Instructions of the
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-32-016, Revision A, dated
June 7, 2005, excluding Appendix A, dated June 2, 2005, and
including Appendix B, dated June 2, 2005; or Bombardier Alert
Service Bulletin A670BA-32-016, Revision F, dated May 14, 2010,
excluding Appendix A, dated June 2, 2005, and including Appendix B,
dated June 2, 2005; except where those service bulletins specify to
contact the manufacturer for repair if no generic repair engineering
order (REO) is available, before further flight, repair using a
method approved by either the Manager, New York ACO, FAA; or TCCA
(or its delegated agent). As of the effective date of this AD, use
only Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-32-016, Revision F,
dated May 14, 2010.
(2) Remove the inboard MLG door in accordance with Part B of the
Accomplishment Instructions of the Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin
A670BA-32-016, Revision A, dated June 7, 2005, excluding Appendix A,
dated June 2, 2005, and including Appendix B, dated June 2, 2005; or
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-32-016, Revision F, dated
May 14, 2010, excluding Appendix A, dated June 2, 2005, and
including Appendix B, dated June 2, 2005; and accomplish paragraph
(n)(2)(i) or (n)(2)(ii) of this AD, as applicable. As of the
effective date of this AD, use only Bombardier Alert Service
Bulletin A670BA-32-016, Revision F, dated May 14, 2010.
(i) For Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702)
airplanes and Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes:
Revise the Configuration Deviation List (CDL), Appendix 1, of the
Bombardier Canadair Regional Jet AFM, to include the following
limitations. This may be accomplished by inserting a copy of this AD
into the CDL of the AFM. Remove any existing CDL limitation required
by paragraph (j)(3)(i) of this AD from the AFM.
``For Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702)
airplanes and Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes:
If one or both door panel assemblies, part number CC670-10520, is
missing:
(1) Take-off Weight is reduced by 202.5 kg/door, or 450 lb/door.
(2) Enroute Climb Weight is reduced by 445.5 kg/door, or 990 lb/
door.
(3) Landing Weight is reduced by 202.5 kg/door, or 450 lb/door.
(4) Fuel Consumption is increased by +2.5% on fuel used/door.
(5) Cruise Airspeed is limited to not more than 0.78 Mach.
(6) The climb ceiling obtained from the Flight Planning and
Cruise Control Manual (FPCCM) must be reduced by 1,000 ft/door.''
Note 3: When a statement with the information specified in
paragraph (n)(2)(i) of this AD has been included in the general
revisions of the AFM, the general revisions may be inserted into the
AFM, and the copy of this AD may be removed from the AFM.
(ii) For Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes:
Revise the CDL, Appendix 1, of the Bombardier Canadair Regional Jet
AFM, to include the following limitations. This may be accomplished
by inserting a copy of this AD into the CDL of the AFM. Remove any
existing CDL limitation required by paragraph (j)(3)(ii) of this AD
from the AFM.
``For Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes: If
one or both door panel assemblies, part number CC670-10520, is
missing:
(1) Take-off Weight is reduced by 245 kg/door, or 540 lb/door.
(2) Enroute Climb Weight is reduced by 551 kg/door, or 1,215 lb/
door.
(3) Landing Weight is reduced by 245 kg/door, or 540 lb/door.
[[Page 61638]]
(4) Fuel Consumption is increased by +2.5% on fuel used/door.
(5) Cruise Airspeed is limited to not more than 0.78 Mach.
(6) The climb ceiling obtained from the Flight Planning and
Cruise Control Manual (FPCCM) must be reduced by 1,000 ft/door.''
Note 4: When a statement with the information specified in
paragraph (n)(2)(ii) of this AD has been included in the general
revisions of the AFM, the general revisions may be inserted into the
AFM, and the copy of this AD may be removed from the AFM.
Revise CDL
(o) For airplanes on which the door(s) have been removed in
accordance with paragraph (j)(3) of this AD: Within 30 days after
August 15, 2006, do the revision specified in paragraph (n)(2)(i) or
(n)(2)(ii) of this AD, as applicable, and remove any revision
required by paragraph (j)(3)(i) or (j)(3)(ii) of this AD.
No Reporting Required
(p) Although Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-32-016,
Revision A, dated June 7, 2005, excluding Appendix A, dated June 2,
2005, and including Appendix B, dated June 2, 2005; and Revision F,
dated May 14, 2010, excluding Appendix A, dated June 2, 2005, and
including Appendix B, dated June 2, 2005; specify to submit certain
information to the manufacturer, this AD does not include that
requirement.
Actions Accomplished According to Previous Issue of Service Bulletin
(q) Actions accomplished before August 15, 2006, according to
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-32-016, dated June 2, 2005,
are considered acceptable for compliance with the corresponding
actions of this AD.
New Requirements of This AD
Terminating Modification for MLG Door Configuration
(r) Within 6,000 flight hours after the effective date of this
AD, modify the MLG door, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-017, Revision
C, dated May 14, 2010. Doing this modification terminates the
requirements of this AD.
Credit for Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Service
Information
(s) Modifying the MLG door before the effective date of this AD,
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 670BA-32-017, dated July 24, 2006; Revision A,
dated September 26, 2006; or Revision B, dated July 31, 2008; as
applicable; is considered acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of paragraph (r) of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note 5: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(t) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO, ANE-170, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to Attention: Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
New York 11590; telephone 516-228-7300; fax 516-794-5531. Before
using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD. AMOCs approved previously in accordance with AD 2006-14-05,
Amendment 39-14676 (71 FR 38979, July 11, 2006), are acceptable for
compliance with this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
Related Information
(u) Refer to MCAI TCCA Airworthiness Directive CF-2003-23R3,
dated May 21, 2010; Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-32-016,
Revision F, dated May 14, 2010, excluding Appendix A, dated June 2,
2005, and including Appendix B, dated June 2, 2005; and Bombardier
Service Bulletin 670BA-32-017, Revision C, dated May 14, 2010; for
related information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 22, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-25571 Filed 10-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P