Possession, Use, and Transfer of Select Agents and Toxins; Biennial Review, 61206-61226 [2011-25427]
Download as PDF
61206
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), we are
also proposing to add two agents, Lujo
and Chapare viruses to the list; adding
definitions; and clarifying language
concerning security, training, biosafety,
and incident response. These changes
will increase the usability of the select
agents and toxins regulations as well as
providing for enhanced program
oversight.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
[Docket No. CDC–2011–0012]
42 CFR Part 73
RIN 0920–AA34
Possession, Use, and Transfer of
Select Agents and Toxins; Biennial
Review
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the Public
Health Security and Bioterrorism
Preparedness and Response Act of 2002
(the Bioterrorism Response Act), the
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) located within the
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) has reviewed the list of
biological agents and toxins that have
the potential to pose a severe threat to
public health and safety and is
proposing to amend and republish the
list as required by the Bioterrorism
Response Act. Further, on July 2, 2010,
the President signed Executive Order
13546, ‘‘Optimizing the Security of
Biological Select Agents and Toxins in
the United States’’ that directed the
Secretaries of HHS and Agriculture
(USDA) to designate a subset of the
select agents and toxins list (Tier 1) that
presents the greatest risk of deliberate
misuse with the most significant
potential for mass casualties or
devastating effects to the economy,
critical infrastructure; or public
confidence; explore options for graded
protection for these Tier 1 agents and
toxins to permit tailored risk
management practices based upon
relevant contextual factors; and consider
reducing the overall number of agents
and toxins on the select agents and
toxins list. E.O. 13546 also established
the Federal Experts Security Advisory
Panel (FESAP) to advise the HHS and
USDA Secretaries on the designation of
Tier 1 agents and toxins, reduction in
the number of agents on the Select
Agent List, establishment of suitability
standards for those having access to Tier
1 select agents and toxins, and
establishment of physical security and
information security standards for Tier
1 select agents and toxins. The tiering of
the select agents and toxins list will
allow the application of more optimized
security measures for those select agents
or toxins which pose a higher risk to
public health and safety should they be
stolen or otherwise misused.
In addition to addressing the FESAP
recommendations in this Notice of
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:10 Sep 30, 2011
Jkt 226001
Comments should be received on
or before December 2, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Regulatory Information
Number (RIN), 0920–AA34 in the
heading of this document by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, Select Agent Program,
1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop A–46,
Atlanta, Georgia 30333, Attn: RIN 0920–
AA34.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and RIN
for this rulemaking. All relevant
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Docket Access: For access to the
docket to read background documents
or comments received or to download
an electronic version of the NPRM, go
to https://www.regulations.gov.
Comments will be available for public
inspection Monday through Friday,
except for legal holidays, from 9 a.m.
until 5 p.m. at 1600 Clifton Road, NE.,
Atlanta, GA 30333. Please call ahead to
1–866–694–4867 and ask for a
representative in the Division of Select
Agents and Toxins to schedule your
visit. Our general policy for comments
and other submissions from members of
the public is to make these submissions
available for public viewing on the
Internet as they are received and
without change.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robbin Weyant, Director, Division of
Select Agents and Toxins, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, 1600
Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop A–46,
Atlanta, Georgia 30333. Telephone:
(404) 718–2000.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Preamble to this notice of proposed
rulemaking is organized as follows:
DATES:
I. Background
II. Proposed Changes to 42 CFR Part 73,
Including Responses to Comments to the
ANPRM
A. Modifications to the List of HHS Select
Agents and Toxins
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
B. Modifications to the List of Overlap
Select Agents and Toxins
C. Tiering
D. Responses to Other Comments and
Other Proposed Changes
i. Exclusions
ii. Security
iii. Select Agent Inventory
iv. Definitions
v. Recombinant/Synthetic Nucleic Acids
vi. Toxins
vii. Responsible Official
viii. Access to Select Agents and Toxins
ix. Security Plan
x. Biosafety Plans
xi. Restricted Experiments
xii. Incident Response
xiii. Training
xiv. Transfers
xv. Records
xvi. Administrative Review
xvii. Guidance Documents
III. Required Regulatory Analyses
A. Executive Order 12866 and 13563
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
D. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice
Reform
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Plain Writing Act of 2010
IV. References
I. Background
The Public Health Security and
Bioterrorism Preparedness and
Response Act of 2002, Subtitle A
(Department of Health and Human
Services) of Title II (Enhancing Controls
on Dangerous Biological Agents and
Toxins) of Public Law 107–188 (June 12,
2002) (42 U.S.C. 262a) (the Bioterrorism
Response Act), requires the HHS
Secretary to establish by regulation a list
of each biological agent and each toxin
that has the potential to pose a severe
threat to public health and safety. In
determining whether to include an
agent or toxin on the list, the HHS
Secretary considers the effect on human
health of exposure to an agent or toxin;
the degree of contagiousness of the
agent and the methods by which the
agent or toxin is transferred to humans;
the availability and effectiveness of
pharmacotherapies and immunizations
to treat and prevent illnesses resulting
from an agent or toxin; the potential for
an agent or toxin to be used as a
biological weapon; and the needs of
children and other vulnerable
populations. The current list of HHS
select agents and toxins can be found at
42 CFR 73.3 (HHS select agents and
toxins) and 42 CFR 73.4 (Overlap select
agents and toxins). The list of HHS and
Overlap select agents and toxins is
available at: https://
www.selectagents.gov/Select%20
Agents%20and%20Toxins%20
List.html. The Bioterrorism Response
Act requires that the HHS Secretary
review and republish the list of select
E:\FR\FM\03OCP2.SGM
03OCP2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 / Proposed Rules
agents and toxins on at least a biennial
basis. See 42 U.S.C. 262a(a)(2).
The HHS Secretary last republished
the HHS select agents and toxins list in
the Federal Register on October 16,
2008 (73 FR 61363). The HHS select
agents and toxins list is divided into
two sections. The select agents and
toxins listed in § 73.3 (HHS select agents
and toxins) are those regulated only by
HHS under the authority of the
Bioterrorism Response Act. The select
agents and toxins listed in § 73.4
(Overlap select agents and toxins) are
those regulated by HHS under the
authority of the Bioterrorism Response
Act and regulated by the USDA under
the authority of the Agricultural
Bioterrorism Protection Act of 2002 (7
U.S.C. 8401).
To fulfill this statutory mandate, the
Center for Disease Control and
Prevention’s (CDC) Division of Select
Agents and Toxins (DSAT) initiated its
biennial review process, which
included consultation with CDC’s
Intragovernmental Select Agents and
Toxins Technical Advisory Committee
(ISATTAC) and other subject matter
experts. The ISATTAC is comprised of
Federal government employees from the
CDC, the National Institutes of Health
(NIH), the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), the USDA/
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS), USDA/Agricultural
Research Service (ARS), USDA/CVB
(Center for Veterinary Biologics), the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS), the Department of Defense
(DOD), and the Biomedical Advanced
Research and Development Authority
(BARDA) within the Office of the
Assistant Secretary for Preparedness
and Response in HHS.
CDC also published an ANPRM in the
Federal Register (75 FR 42363) (July 21,
2010 ANPRM) inviting comments
concerning potential changes to part 73
of Title 42 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (the select agent
regulations). We solicited comments
regarding (1) the appropriateness of the
current HHS list of select agents and
toxins; (2) whether there are other
biological agents or toxins that should
be added to the HHS list; (3) whether
biological agents or toxins currently on
the HHS list should be deleted from the
list; (4) whether the HHS select agents
and toxins list should be tiered based on
the relative bioterrorism risk of each
biological agent or toxin; and (5)
whether the security requirements for
select agents or toxins in the highest tier
should be further stratified based on
type of use or other factors. We
requested recommendations regarding
the criteria to use to designate high risk
select agents and toxins and those
recommendations were included in the
interagency working group discussions
on the matter. Relevant issues raised by
the comments are discussed below in
‘‘II. Proposed Changes to 42 CFR part
73.’’
On July 2, 2010, President Obama
signed Executive Order (E.O.) 13546:
‘‘Optimizing the Security of Biological
Select Agents and Toxins in the United
States’’ that directed the Secretaries of
HHS and USDA to (1) designate a subset
of the select agents and toxins list (Tier
1) that presents the greatest risk of
deliberate misuse with the most
significant potential for mass casualties
or devastating effects to the economy,
critical infrastructure; or public
confidence; (2) explore options for
graded protection of Tier 1 agents and
toxins to permit tailored risk
management practices based upon
relevant contextual factors; and (3)
consider reducing the overall number of
agents and toxins on the select agents
and toxins list. E.O. 13546 also
established the FESAP to advise the
HHS and USDA Secretaries on the
designation of Tier 1 agents and toxins,
reduction in the number of agents on
the Select Agent List, establishment of
personnel reliability standards for those
having access to Tier 1 select agents and
toxins, and establishment of physical
security and information security
standards for Tier 1 select agents and
toxins. E.O. 13546 is available at:
https://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/
2010-16864.pdf. The FESAP provided
61207
its recommendations to the HHS and
USDA Secretaries on November 2, 2010.
The FESAP recommendations addressed
the reduction of the list of select agents
and toxins, the identification of a subset
of the list that includes those that
presents the greatest risk of deliberate
misuse with the most significant
potential for mass casualties or
devastating effects to the economy,
critical infrastructure; or public
confidence; and the optimization of
security programs at registered entities.
In drafting its recommendations to
modify and stratify the list of select
agents and toxins, the FESAP utilized
expert knowledge of the agents,
combined with information from the
DHS’s Material Threat Determinations
of biological agents and toxins. Care was
used to balance risks identified with the
Congressional mandate to ensure the
availability of select agents and toxins
for research and educational activities.
Other sources of input that we have
considered in the drafting of this
Proposed Rule include the following:
The National Science Advisory Board
for Biosecurity, the National Academies,
and comments received from
professional societies and the public in
response to the CDC ANPRM published
on July 21, 2010.
The purpose of this notice of
proposed rulemaking is to seek public
comment on (1) the appropriateness of
the current HHS and Overlap list of
select agents and toxins including
whether there are other agents or toxins
that should be added to the HHS or
Overlap list or whether agents or toxins
currently on the HHS or Overlap list
should be deleted from the list; (2) the
appropriateness of the proposed tiering
of the select agents and toxins list; (3)
whether minimum standards for
personnel reliability, physical and cyber
security should be prescribed for
identified Tier 1 agents; and (4) any
other aspect of the proposed
amendments to the select agent
regulations.
II. Proposed Changes to 42 CFR Part 73
PROPOSED CHANGES TO 42 CFR PART 73
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Section No.
Current
Change
73.0 ....................
73.1 ....................
Applicability and related requirements ....
Definitions ................................................
73.2 ....................
73.3 ....................
Purpose and scope .................................
HHS select agents and toxins .................
No change.
Definitions added: Adjudicated as a mental defective; alien; committed to any
mental institution; controlled substance; crime punishable by imprisonment for a
term exceeding 1 year; indictment; information security; lawfully admitted for
permanent residence; mental institution; occupational exposure; recombinant
and synthetic nucleic acids; restricted person; unlawful use of any controlled
substance.
No change.
Designates Tier 1 select agents and toxins; adds select agents and toxins; clarifies language; deletes from the HHS list.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:10 Sep 30, 2011
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\03OCP2.SGM
03OCP2
61208
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 / Proposed Rules
PROPOSED CHANGES TO 42 CFR PART 73—Continued
Section No.
Current
Change
73.4 ....................
Overlap select agents and toxins ............
73.5 ....................
73.11 ..................
Exemptions for HHS select agents and
toxins.
Exemptions for overlap select agents
and toxins.
Registration and related security risk assessments.
Denial, revocation, or suspension of registration.
Responsible Official .................................
Restricting access to select agents and
toxins; security risk assessments.
Security ....................................................
Designates Tier 1 select agents and toxins; adds select agents and toxins; clarifies language; deletes from the overlap list.
Amends the immediate notification list to Tier 1 agents.
73.12 ..................
Biosafety ..................................................
73.13
73.14
73.15
73.16
73.17
73.18
73.19
73.20
73.21
Restricted experiments ............................
Incident response ....................................
Training ....................................................
Transfers .................................................
Records ...................................................
Inspections ..............................................
Notification of theft, loss, or release .......
Administrative review ..............................
Civil money penalties ..............................
73.6 ....................
73.7 ....................
73.8 ....................
73.9 ....................
73.10 ..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
A. Modifications to the List of HHS
Select Agents and Toxins
The following changes to the list of
HHS select agents and toxins are
proposed based on comments received
in response to the July 21, 2010
ANPRM, recommendations from the
FESAP and ISATTAC, and our review of
current scientific data regarding select
agents and toxins. As we discuss below,
we are proposing to remove 6 select
agents, add 2 select agents, and identify
11 select agents and toxins as ‘‘Tier 1’’
agents to the HHS list of select agents
and toxins.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Proposed Addition of Lujo and Chapare
Viruses
On August 19, 2009 (74 FR 41829), we
proposed the addition of Chapare virus
to the HHS list of select agents and
toxins; we did not receive any
comments regarding that proposal.
Based on scientific data and risks
associated with this virus, the ISATTAC
recommended the addition of Chapare
virus to the HHS list of select agents and
toxins. The determination to add
Chapare virus to the HHS list of select
agents and toxins was based on the
following scientific information. The
HHS list currently includes members of
the arenaviridae family (Junin,
Machupo, Sabia, Flexal, Guanarito, and
Lassa). Arenaviruses are rodent-borne
viruses, some of which can be
associated with large hemorrhagic fever
outbreaks, and untreated case fatalities
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:10 Sep 30, 2011
Jkt 226001
Amends the immediate notification list to Tier 1 agents.
No change.
Clarifies language.
Redesignates paragraphs; adds new paragraphs (a)(3), (a)(6).
Redesignates paragraphs; adds new paragraph (e); adds clarifying language.
Revises regulatory text—paragraph (b), (c)(2). Redesignates paragraphs; adds
new paragraphs (c)(8), (c)(9), (c)(10), (e).
Revises paragraphs (a) and (c)(1); replaces ‘‘url’’ in paragraph (c)(3); redesignates paragraph (d); adds new paragraph (d).
Clarifies language.
Redesignates paragraphs; adds new paragraphs (d) and (e).
Revises paragraph (a); redesignates paragraphs; adds new paragraph (b).
Redesignates paragraphs; adds new paragraphs (f), (h), (l).
Revises paragraph (a)(1); redesignates paragraphs; adds new paragraph (a)(2).
No changes.
No changes.
Revises paragraphs.
No changes.
can be in excess of 30 percent. Chapare
virus is a recently described New World
arenavirus that is associated with fatal
hemorrhagic fever syndrome and is
most closely related to Sabia virus, an
HHS select agent (Ref 1). Based on the
ISATTAC recommendation and our
examination of the current scientific
data and risks associated with this virus,
we are proposing to add Chapare to the
HHS list.
The ISATTAC also recommended the
addition of Lujo virus to the HHS list of
select agents and toxins. Based on this
recommendation and our examination
of the current scientific data and risks
associated with this virus, we are also
proposing to add Lujo virus. The
scientific determination was based on
the fact that the Lujo virus caused a fatal
outbreak of hemorrhagic fever, has an
unprecedented high case fatality rate of
80 percent, has been phylogenetically
identified as an arenavirus and is
related to those members of the Old
World arenaviridae family (Junin,
Machupo, Sabia, Flexal, Guanarito, and
Lassa) listed as HHS select agents that
cause hemorrhagic fever and pose a
significant risk to public health and
safety (Ref 2).
Proposed Removal of Cercopithecine
Herpesvirus 1 (Herpes B Virus)
Commenters acknowledged in
response to the July 21, 2010 ANPRM
that (1) the Herpes B virus naturally
infects many species of macaques; and
(2) can produce a serious, often fatal,
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
infection in humans when not treated.
However, the commenters argued that
Herpes B virus should not be included
as a select agent based on the following
assertions:
• The inclusion of the virus on the
list will produce no significant
improvements in safety for the
American public.
• Given the high prevalence of
infection in non-human primates and
the relatively few human infections that
have been recorded, it suggests that the
virus is not easily transmitted to
humans.
• The virus is capable of being treated
with several available licensed antiviral
compounds.
• The virus does not present a
sufficient risk of infection by the aerosol
route.
• The virus is a highly unlikely
candidate for a bioterrorism agent due to
its environmental instability and the
need for direct contact for infection. The
argument is further enhanced by the
absence of the virus listed on the NIH’s
National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases lists of Category A,
B & C Priority Pathogens or the CDC’s
Category A, B & C Bioterrorism Agents
lists.
• The virus is widely available in
nature.
The ISATTAC and the FESAP also
recommended the removal of
Cercopithecine herpesvirus 1 (Herpes B
virus) from the HHS list of select agents
and toxins. We agreed with the
E:\FR\FM\03OCP2.SGM
03OCP2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
commenters, ISATTAC, and FESAP and
propose to remove Cercopithecine
herpesvirus 1 (Herpes B virus) from the
HHS list of select agents and toxins. Our
rationale for this proposal is based on
the facts that this virus is not easily
transmitted to humans, the person-toperson transmission risk is small, the
numbers of recorded human infections
are low, and multiple licensed antiviral
treatments for Herpes B infections are
available.
Proposed Removal of Coccidioides
posadasii/Coccidioides immitis
Commenters to our July 21, 2010
ANPRM argued that Coccidioides
posadasii/Coccidioides immitis should
not be included as a select agent based
on the following reasons:
• The characteristics of Coccidioides
species do not provide convincing
properties of an effective agent of
bioterrorism.
• The fungi are endemic in the
southwestern United States, but do not
cause large epidemics even with high
prevalence in the air during wind
storms.
• Infections caused by the fungi are
easily treatable by licensed antifungal
medicines, especially early in disease.
• The difficulty to use Coccidioides
species as a bioweapon, and hence the
need for strict regulation under the
select agent regulations, is exemplified
by their non-communicability, lack of
history of use or development as
successful biological weapons, and a
relatively low incidence of symptomatic
disease following natural infection.
• Coccidioides species would not be
an effective bioterrorism weapon
because the percentage of deaths and
hospitalizations are low considering the
number of people infected.
The FESAP also recommended
removal of Coccidioides posadasii/
Coccidioides immitis from the HHS list
of select agents and toxins. We agreed
with the commenters and FESAP and
propose to remove Coccidioides
posadasii/Coccidioides immitis from the
HHS list of select agents and toxins. The
scientific determination was based on
the availability of licensed treatments
for Coccidioides infection and a
lowering of our assessment of the
impact of Coccidioides infection on
human health, as indicated by the high
proportion of subclinical cases observed
in endemic areas (Ref 3).
Proposed Retention of Coxiella burnetii
Commenters to the July 21, 2010
ANPRM argued that Coxiella burnetii (Q
fever) should be removed from the
select agents and toxins list based on the
following assertions:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:10 Sep 30, 2011
Jkt 226001
• Q fever is not contagious and is
effectively treated with licensed
antibiotics.
• It is generally a self-limiting
infection with potential control by
licensed vaccination.
• The ubiquitous nature of Coxiella
burnetii means that it can be easily
acquired from environmental sources
and calls into question the effectiveness
and procedures for maintaining
inventories of select agents.
• Person-to-person transmission of
the disease is rare and is fatal less than
one percent of the time.
• A vaccine is available for this agent
internationally, but not domestically.
• The agent is commonly found in
animal populations within the United
States.
However, FESAP and ISATTAC did
not recommend removing this
bacterium from the HHS list of select
agents and toxins. We agreed with the
FESAP and ISATTAC recommendations
and propose to retain Coxiella burnetii
on the HHS select agents and toxins list.
The determinations to retain this agent
on the HHS list are its robust
environmental stability, ease of
transmission to humans, extremely low
infectious dose, and prior association of
this agent with offensive programs. CDC
invites comments regarding retaining
this agent on the HHS list of select
agents and toxins.
Proposed Removal of South American
Genotypes of Eastern Equine
Encephalitis Virus (EEEV)
Commenters on the July 21, 2010
ANPRM regarding the proposed
inclusion of EEEV on the list of select
agents and toxins argued that EEEV
should not be included as a select agent
based on the following reasons:
• The virus occurs naturally in the
environment.
• Direct person-to-person
transmission does not occur.
• Local and State health departments
and mosquito control agencies routinely
release information regarding the
location of arboviral activity in the
community, so upholding strict
biosecurity measures in a laboratory has
little or no impact on reducing a
terrorist’s ability to acquire this agent.
• Only North American strains of
EEEV should be regulated because
transmission patterns limit the
distribution and epidemic potential of
South American strains, which are less
pathogenic.
We examined the current scientific
data and noted that strains of EEEV can
be categorized into two distinct
genotypes primarily based upon
geographic distribution: North
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
61209
American genotype (NA EEE) and South
American genotype (SA EEE). The NA
EEE genotype consists of strains
obtained from North America and the
Caribbean while SA EEE genotype
viruses originate in Central and South
America. Viruses in the two genotypes
are distinctly different in their genetics,
epidemiology, and pathogenicity. NA
EEE, which are the strains responsible
for human and equine disease, are all
genetically very similar to each other
(less than 3% divergence at the
nucleotide level) and can be easily
distinguished from SA EEE genotype
strains by sequencing. NA EEE genotype
strains differ from SA EEE viruses by
greater than 20% at the nucleotide level
and approximately 10% at the amino
acid level. Since FESAP agreed with our
scientific assessment that SA EEE
genotypes should be removed from the
HHS list of select agents and toxins, we
are proposing to remove SA EEE
genotypes from the HHS list of select
agents and toxins (Ref 4).
Proposed Removal of Flexal Virus
Commenters that responded to the
July 21, 2010 ANPRM felt that Flexal
virus should be removed from the HHS
list of select agents and toxins based on
the lack of severity of disease and the
lack of significant outbreaks of disease
associated with infection with this virus
in humans. FESAP also recommended
that Flexal virus be removed from the
list. Since our research found a lack of
significant outbreaks of disease
associated with Flexal virus in humans
and that this virus would be a highly
unlikely candidate for a bioterrorism
agent, we are proposing to remove
Flexal virus from the HHS list of select
agents and toxins.
Proposed Retention of Monkeypox Virus
Commenters to the July 21, 2010
ANPRM recommended that Monkeypox
virus should not be included as a select
agent based on the following assertions:
• An effective licensed vaccine is
available.
• Promising antivirals are in
advanced stages of development.
• The virus is inefficiently
transmitted from person-to-person.
We examined the current scientific
data and noted that there is an increased
incidence of Monkeypox virus in
humans as well as studies identifying
the virus being easily transmitted in
Gambian rats. A recent study on an
outbreak in Sudan indicates there is
much strain variation in level of
infectivity and severity of disease.
Concern over the detection of new
lineages with increased pathogenesis
has been expressed. Another recent
E:\FR\FM\03OCP2.SGM
03OCP2
61210
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
outbreak of Monkeypox virus in the
United States suggested numerous
animals could become infected
complicating the understanding of
zoonotic maintenance of the virus (Ref
29–33).
While there has been documented
cross protection against Monkeypox
virus by Vaccinia virus vaccine, the
decrease in the number of individuals
with any immunity to the virus is
drastically declining (since smallpox
vaccination no longer occurs). Further,
even though there is a stockpile of
Vaccinia virus vaccine available, the
vaccine has numerous undesirable sideeffects that make it less than optimal for
mass vaccination. There are also several
antiviral treatments for Monkeypox in
advanced stages of development, but
they are not currently available. Thus,
there is currently no specific treatment
(Ref 29–33).
FESAP recommended keeping
Monkeypox virus on the HHS list of
select agents and toxins.
Based on the scientific determination
outlined above, we are proposing to
retain Monkeypox virus on the HHS list
of select agents and toxins. We will
continue to monitor progress in the
development of antivirals and other
means of prevention and control of
Monkeypox virus infections and invite
comments on removing a certain clade
of Monkeypox virus (i.e., West African
clade of Monkeypox virus) from the
HHS list of select agents and toxins.
Proposed Reorganization of Tick-Borne
Encephalitis Complex Viruses (TBEV)
Even though we received no
comments to the July 21, 2010 ANPRM
regarding the removal of these viruses
from the HHS list of select agents and
toxins, we are proposing the removal of
TBEV Central European subtype from
the HHS list of select agents and toxins
for the following scientific reasons:
• The TBEV Central European Tickborne subtype has been shown to be less
virulent in humans than the Far Eastern
subtype (Ref 5).
• No TBEV vaccines are licensed or
available in the United States; however
two safe, effective inactivated TBEV
vaccines are available internationally.
FESAP also recommended the
removal of the TBEV Central European
subtype from the HHS list of select
agents and toxins.
In addition to removing the TBEV
Central European subtype from the HHS
list of select agents and toxins, we
propose to reorganize the listing of the
TBEV to reflect the current
nomenclature given by the International
Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. For
TBEV proper, there are now just three
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:32 Sep 30, 2011
Jkt 226001
recognized subtypes: Central European,
Far Eastern, and Siberian. The Russian
Spring and Summer encephalitis
designation is no longer recognized (Ref
6). Two other viruses on the HHS list of
select agents and toxins, Kyasanur
Forest disease virus and Omsk
Hemorrhagic fever virus, are no longer
classified as TBEV. In recognition of
these taxonomic changes, we are
proposing to include these viruses on
the HHS list of select agents and toxins
as follows:
Tick-borne encephalitis virus
Far Eastern subtype
Siberian subtype
Kyasanur Forest disease virus
Omsk Hemorrhagic fever virus
Proposed Retention of Rickettsia
prowazekii and Rickettsia Rickettsii
Commenters that responded to the
July 21, 2010 ANPRM argued that
Rickettsia prowazekii and Rickettsia
rickettsii should be removed from the
HHS list of select agents and toxins
based on the following assertions:
• Mimicking transmission by
arthropod vectors in an effort to
disperse these pathogens with the intent
to disrupt society would be challenging
and technologically unlikely to be
successful.
• Common and readily available
licensed antibiotics are highly effective,
and contagion is not a threat because
spread is determined by contact with
the vectors, not through person-toperson contact.
• Although Rickettsia prowazekii
may be a pathogen of military
significance, Rickettsia rickettsii is not.
According to the commenter,
propagation of the pathogens requires
growth in cultured host cells and
natural infection occurs by parenteral
inoculation through a tick vector, so
mass exposure by aerosolization or
contamination of food sources is
unlikely to result in disease.
• The potential to use this agent as a
platform to construct a genetically
engineered new pathogen would be
extremely difficult.
• The primary disease associated
with Rickettsia rickettsii is Rocky
Mountain Spotted Fever, and the
symptoms are recognizable and
marketed diagnostics and treatment are
readily available.
• Rickettsia rickettsii should be
removed because generation of even
moderate amounts of infectious material
is exceedingly difficult and requires
specialized equipment.
• Rickettsiae are not spread directly
from person-to-person, would not
survive if dispersed into the
environment, and are susceptible to a
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
number of readily available licensed
antibiotics. In addition, there is no
possibility of eliminating their presence
in the environment.
• Potential benefits of lessening
restriction on research include
improved diagnostic capabilities and
better potential for vaccine
development.
The FESAP and ISATTAC
recommended keeping Rickettsia
prowazekii and Rickettsia rickettsii on
the HHS list of select agents and toxins.
Since we agreed with these expert
panels, we are proposing to retain
Rickettsia prowazekii and Rickettsia
rickettsii on the HHS select agents and
toxins list based on our scientific
determination regarding the
environmental stability, low infectious
dose, aerosol transmission, and clinical
significance of infection with these
organisms.
Proposed Retention of Yersinia pestis
Commenters that responded to the
July 21, 2010 ANPRM argued that
Yersinia pestis should not be included
as a select agent based on the following
assertions:
• Yersinia pestis is naturally
occurring and does not survive for long
outside of its rodent host because of
susceptibility to heat and sunlight.
• Decontamination of surfaces is
highly effective in limiting its spread.
• Licensed treatments are readily
available for those who may become
exposed.
The FESAP and ISATTAC
recommended that Yersinia pestis
remain on the HHS list of select agents
and toxins.
We agree with the FESAP and
ISATTAC, and are proposing to keep
Yersinia pestis on the HHS select agents
and toxins list based on our scientific
conclusion regarding the bacterium’s
high mortality rate, ease of
dissemination and production, and
person-to-person transmission of
Yersinia pestis infections.
Proposed Reorganization of
Staphylococcal Enterotoxins
Commenters to the July 21, 2010
ANPRM suggested that the regulations
needed a clear statement concerning
staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs) and
staphylococcal enterotoxin-like toxins
(SEls). Commenters stated that SEs and
SEls have been distinguished from each
other on the basis of emetic activity (Ref
12). Commenters were confused
regarding whether the intent of the
select agent regulations is to
acknowledge this difference and not
regulate SEls or to regulate both SEs and
SEls.
E:\FR\FM\03OCP2.SGM
03OCP2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 / Proposed Rules
ISATTAC recommended that we
amend the HHS list of select agents and
toxins to specifically include
Staphylococcal enterotoxins A, B, C, D,
and E in the HHS list of select agents
and toxins. We agree with the
commenters and the ISATTAC
recommendation, and propose to amend
the select agents and toxins list from
‘‘Staphylococcal enterotoxins’’ to
specifically include ‘‘Staphylococcal
enterotoxins A, B, C, D, and E’’ in the
HHS list of select agents and toxins (Ref
7–14). Serotypes G, H, and I should not
added to the HHS list of select agents
and toxins because serotypes G, H, and
I are at least 10 fold less of a risk than
SEE and SEA (Ref 15–16.) According to
the International Nomenclature
Committee for Staphylococcal
Superantigens, emesis in a primate
model within five hours post-feeding
must be observed to classify an exotoxin
as an enterotoxin (Ref 12). If emesis is
not observed in this period of time, the
exotoxin should be classified as
enterotoxin-like rather than enterotoxin.
Based on this internationally accepted
standard, we are proposing serotypes J,
K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, T, U, U2 and V
should be designated staphylococcal
enterotoxin-like rather than enterotoxin
because these serotypes have been
shown to either not cause emesis in a
primate model or have not been tested
for emesis (Ref 17–26). Therefore, we
are proposing serotypes J, K, L, M, N, O,
P, Q, T, U, U2 and V should not added
to the HHS list of select agents and
toxins.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
B. Modifications to the List of Overlap
Select Agents and Toxins
The following changes to the list of
Overlap select agents and toxins are
proposed based on comments received
to the July 21, 2010 ANPRM,
recommendations from the FESAP and
ISATTAC, and our review of current
scientific data regarding select agents
and toxins.
Proposed Retention of Bacillus
anthracis (Pasteur Strain)
A commenter to the July 21, 2010
ANPRM stated that the Pasteur strain of
Bacillus anthracis should not be
considered a select agent because the
strain is attenuated and used for quality
control testing in Laboratory Response
Network (LRN) laboratories. The
commenter argued that changing the
status of the Pasteur strain would
alleviate the burden of recordkeeping
for quality control and proficiency
testing activities.
We made no changes based on this
comment. It should be noted that we
excluded Bacillus anthracis Sterne
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:10 Sep 30, 2011
Jkt 226001
strain in 2003 because the attenuated
strain was determined to not pose a
severe threat to public health and safety,
animal health, or animal products. We
have not excluded the plasmid-negative
Pasteur variant in order to prevent the
combination of plasmids from Sterne
and Pasteur-types of strains to create a
wild type phenotype.
Proposed Retention of Brucella abortus,
Brucella melitensis, and Brucella suis
Commenters to the July 21, 2010
ANPRM recommended that Brucella
abortus, Brucella melitensis, and
Brucella suis be removed from the
Overlap list of select agents and toxins
for the following reasons:
• The benefits of removal far exceed
any risk mitigated by continuing the
listing. In the years since the organism
was first listed, research and
development has been greatly
diminished.
• As currently regulated, existing
BSL–3 facilities do not have the
capacity to conduct brucellosis research
with sufficient numbers of animals to
generate statistically valid research
results, and it is too expensive to
construct and maintain enough high
capacity BSL–3 facilities to conduct the
necessary research. The commenter
contended that any risk currently
mitigated by the listing is fully
manageable without such listing.
• Brucella abortus and Brucella suis
should be removed because the
organisms are adversely affected by
environmental conditions and can be
diagnosed and controlled in animals
and readily treated in humans. The
classification of these bacteria as select
agents has hampered research that could
result in vaccines that would protect
susceptible animal populations.
Although brucellosis will remain a
disease of agricultural significance,
Brucella abortus and Brucella suis are
not ideal biological weapons. The
commenter suggested, however, that
Brucella melitensis remain on the list
because it is a foreign animal disease
and the most infectious of all the
species.
• Brucella species should have their
listed status reconsidered because
human infection is rarely fatal, acute
brucellosis can be readily treated with
available antibiotics, human-to-human
transmission is extremely rare, and
wildlife carriers in the United States
often come into contact with humans
without significant transmission.
• Naturally occurring substances such
as Brucella should be removed because
infections regularly occur from natural
exposures.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
61211
• The primary mode of transmission
for Brucella abortus is through contact
with contaminated fluids/tissues, its
pathogenicity is moderate, and
infections are routinely treated with
antibiotics that do an effective job. The
commenter recommended removal of
Brucella abortus strain 1119–3 because
the strain is identical using
conventional typing tests to strain 19
and is used as an antigen strain in
diagnostic tests. Strain 19 and RB51
have been excluded as licensed vaccine
products, but other research strains have
not been excluded.
• Another commenter supported
downgrading the risk assessment for
vaccine strains of Brucella. The
commenter was concerned that the only
criterion the ISATTAC accepts for
exclusion is licensed drug status, but
such a high standard is disadvantageous
to research on this pathogen.
The FESAP and ISATTAC
recommended that Brucella abortus,
Brucella melitensis, and Brucella suis
remain on the Overlap list of select
agents and toxins. We made no changes
based on these comments because we
agreed with these expert panels that
Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis,
and Brucella suis remain on the Overlap
list of select agents and toxins based on
the bacteria’s ease of production, high
infectivity via the aerosol route, low
infectious dose, and no brucellosis
vaccines are currently available for
humans in the United States.
Proposed Retention of Burkholderia
mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei
Commenters to the July 21, 2010
ANPRM contended that Burkholderia
mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei
should not be included as select agents
based on the following reasons:
• The agents do not rise to the same
level of public health threat or
feasibility for weaponization that the
other agents on the list do.
• Burkholderia mallei and
Burkholderia pseudomallei are endemic
in a number of areas of the world.
• Disease resulting from Burkholderia
mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei
is treatable with low mortality.
• It is questionable how they would
be used as bioweapons.
The FESAP and ISATTAC
recommended that Burkholderia mallei
and Burkholderia pseudomallei remain
on the Overlap list of select agents and
toxins. We made no changes based on
these comments because we agreed with
these expert panels that Burkholderia
mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei
should remain on the Overlap list of
select agents and toxins based on our
scientific determination that the bacteria
E:\FR\FM\03OCP2.SGM
03OCP2
61212
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
can be produced in large quantity;
transmitted via aerosol; and
Burkholderia pseudomallei is highly
stable in the environment. The mortality
rate for untreated cases of both
melioidosis and glanders is high, and
given the rarity of these diseases in the
United States, experience in their
diagnosis and treatment is limited.
Proposed Reorganization of Venezuelan
Equine Encephalitis Virus (VEEV)
Commenters to the July 21, 2010
ANPRM contended that VEEV subtypes
ID and IE should not be included as
select agents based on the following
reasons:
• Inclusion of VEEV subtypes as
select agents should be based solely on
their ability to cause an epidemic or
epizootic following a bioterrorism event.
This would require inclusion of only
varieties 1AB and 1C VEEV which have
been shown to have epidemic/epizootic
potential.
• The reasons for excluding 1D and
1E VEEVs from the select agent list are:
(1) No subtype 1D or 1E VEEV have ever
caused large equine epizootics; (2)
Inclusion of 1D viruses because they
might be precursors to 1C viruses is not
sufficient for making 1D viruses select
agents. Essentially all of this evidence is
laboratory based. The possibility of a 1D
virus mutating to a 1C virus following
a bioterrorism event is unlikely because
1D viruses are unlikely to establish
epidemic or epizootic transmission
cycles in the US. Natural transmission
cycles would likely be needed for any
evolution from 1D to 1C to occur in
nature; (3) Emergency vaccination of
equines with currently approved equine
vaccines or humans with IND vaccines
(e.g. TC–83) would interdict or greatly
dampen a 1D or a 1E epizootic, based
on antigenic cross-reactivities of
subtype 1 viruses; and (4) The currently
available humanized or human antiVEEV monoclonal antibodies that could
be produced for emergency use would
also have prophylactic, and possibly
therapeutic efficacy for all VEEV
subtype 1 infections with which they
cross react (includes 1D and 1E viruses).
The FESAP and ISATTAC
recommended removal of certain
subtypes of Venezuelan equine
encephalitis virus from the Overlap list
of select agents and toxins. Since we
agreed with commenters and expert
panels recommendations, we are
proposing to clarify that only VEEV
subtypes IAB and IC should remain on
the Overlap list of select agents and
toxins because these subtypes contain
the only recognized strains of
Venezuelan equine encephalitis that
have demonstrated the ability to cause
epidemics or epizootics. The remaining
subtypes, ID and IE, are strains
prevalent among the existing animal
populations and do not represent the
same type of risk. Other viruses within
the Venezuelan equine encephalitis
complex (subtypes IF and II through IV)
are separate viruses and are not
included in the HHS and USDA overlap
list of select agents and toxins.
C. Tiering
E.O. 13546 specifies that a subset of
the Select Agent List be categorized as
‘‘Tier 1’’ because these agents and toxins
present the greatest risk of deliberate
misuse with the most significant
potential for mass casualties or
devastating effects to the economy,
critical infrastructure, or public
confidence. All but one of the
commenters to the July 21, 2010
ANPRM who addressed the idea of a
tiering system based on the relative
bioterrorism risk of each agent or toxin
favored the use of tiers. Several
commenters mentioned specific criteria
for tiering. A few commenters expressed
the concern that tiering could create
confusion, especially for facilities with
multiple Biological Select Agents and
Toxins (BSAT) and had concerns about
additional requirements that would be
placed on some laboratories. Some
commenters identified specific Tier 1
candidates from the BSAT listed in 42
CFR 73.3 and § 73.4. Most of these
commenters included Variola major
virus and Variola minor virus, as well
as Reconstructed 1918 Influenza virus,
Ebola viruses, and Marburg virus in
their Tier 1 list. Two commenters also
suggested Bacillus anthracis and Lassa
fever virus. Other commenters suggested
Francisella tularensis, South America
hemorrhagic fever viruses, Brucella
species, Coxiella burnettii, Botulinum
neurotoxin, and Ricin as candidates for
Tier 1.
Based on E.O. 13546, a FESAP
recommendation and our agreement
with the comments received, we are
proposing to amend the select agent
regulations to establish a number of
select agents and toxins as Tier 1 select
agents and toxins within the lists of
HHS and Overlap select agents and
toxins. All select agents and toxins were
scored against 20 criteria by over 60
Subject Matter Experts representing the
Federal life sciences, public health, law
enforcement, security, and intelligence
communities, which included:
• The relative ease with which a
particular select agent or toxin might be
disseminated or transmitted from one
human to another or into the
environment where it could produce a
deleterious effect upon human health;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:10 Sep 30, 2011
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
• The potential for a high mortality
rate;
• The potential for a major human
health impact;
• Select agents or toxins whose
misuse might result in public panic or
other social or economic disruption; and
• Select agents or toxins whose use
might require Federal, State, and/or
local officials to take special action in
planning for major human health
disasters.
The select agents that we propose will
be designated as Tier 1 are the
following:
HHS
• Ebola virus
• Francisella tularensis
• Marburg virus
• Variola major virus
• Variola minor virus
• Yersinia pestis
• Botulinum neurotoxin
• Toxin-producing strains of
Clostridium botulinum
OVERLAP
• Bacillus anthracis
• Burkholderia mallei
• Burkholderia pseudomallei
Regarding the Reconstructed 1918
Influenza virus, recent studies have
increased our understanding of the
public health risks associated with this
agent. Current reports indicate that 60
percent of the population in the United
States is immune to the 1918 Influenza
virus and that antiviral treatments exist
(Ref 27–28). Based on this information
we propose to retain the Reconstructed
1918 Influenza virus on the HHS list of
select agents and toxins, but not to
include it in Tier 1 of this list.
Based on the information currently
available, we conclude that the adoption
of the Tier 1 designation would not
result in significant economic effects to
the regulated community. However, we
are asking for any additional data or
comments on the potential effects of
designating the above agents as Tier 1.
D. Responses to Other Comments and
Other Proposed Changes
With respect to the remainder of the
sections outlined below, we are
proposing the following changes based
on comments received in response to
the July 21, 2010 ANPRM and
recommendations from the FESAP. We
are proposing to update the Web
address throughout the document as all
information concerning the Federal
Select Agent Program is now centralized
on the National Select Agent Registry
Web site at https://www.selectagents.
gov/. We also are proposing nonsubstantive changes throughout the
E:\FR\FM\03OCP2.SGM
03OCP2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 / Proposed Rules
regulations for purposes of clarity. In
addition, HHS/CDC and USDA/APHIS
made the language similar to ensure
consistency between the regulations.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Exclusions
In order to update the regulations to
accurately reflect the way in which we
handle the listing of exclusions, we are
proposing to remove the language
stating that exclusions will be published
in the Federal Register. This change is
necessary because, while we anticipated
publication of exclusions both in the
Federal Register and on the Internet at
the time the regulations were initially
created, we have found that publication
on the select agent Web site only has
served to provide the most up-to-date
information to the regulated
community.
Security
Commenters that responded to the
July 21, 2010 ANPRM suggested
security requirements include
laboratory handling only by certified,
trained individuals; physical security
systems; restricted access; and security
risk assessments. Commenters also
identified some criteria for stratifying,
such as making the requirements riskbased, considering the type of work
done at the facility, acknowledging that
many threats are from disgruntled
insiders, requiring review of the
stratification by subject matter experts,
and taking into account the needs of the
researchers at the facility.
Based on our agreement with the
comments received, and input from the
FESAP and stakeholder groups, we are
proposing more specific minimum
security standards for Tier 1 select
agents or toxins. These additional
requirements would be added as section
73.11(e). We believe these proposed
minimum security standards for Tier 1
select agents would serve to further
mitigate the potential for deliberate
misuse of these select agents and toxins
that could result in mass casualties or
devastating effects to the economy,
critical infrastructure, or public
confidence.
These proposed changes are based on
established security industry standards
with respect to securing high risk
material and developed in accordance
with the experience and expertise of the
Federal Select Agent Program and in
consultation with DOD, FBI, and DHS
security experts. They are necessary in
order to further ensure the safety and
security of those select agents and
toxins that are proposed to be deemed
Tier 1 agents. The requirements for
working with all other select agents and
toxins would remain unchanged with
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:10 Sep 30, 2011
Jkt 226001
the exception of certain miscellaneous
changes that are detailed below.
Security of Variola Major Virus and
Variola Minor Virus
In recognition of the special public
health risks associated with Variola
major virus and Variola minor virus, we
are also proposing to require additional
physical security measures over and
above those proposed for Tier 1. These
additional requirements would be
added as section 73.11(e)(5) (Security).
We believe this change is necessary
because Variola major virus and Variola
minor virus were determined to pose a
significantly higher public health risk
than the other agents and toxins that
were proposed for the Tier 1 select
agents and toxins list. We also believe
that it would not be appropriate to
require that the special security
procedures appropriate for Variola
major virus and Variola minor virus be
made applicable to other agents or
toxins on a Tier 1 list.
Select Agent Inventory
Many commenters to the July 21, 2010
ANPRM pointed out that the
requirement to account for individual
vials of each pathogen is inappropriate
for replicating biological agents.
Commenters stated that this is a costly
and burdensome responsibility for
laboratories and their staff and that this
requirement should be abolished except
for Tier 1 agents.
We are not proposing any changes to
the select agent regulations based on
these comments. Currently, the select
agent regulations state that an accurate,
current inventory for each select agent
(including viral genetic elements,
recombinant nucleic acids, and
recombinant organisms) held in longterm storage (placement in a system
designed to ensure viability for future
use, such as in a freezer or lyophilized
materials) must be maintained. The
requirement to account for individual
vials of each pathogen in long term
storage is necessary to ensure the
biosecurity of select agents and toxins.
Further guidance on this requirement
can be found at https://
www.selectagents.gov.
Definitions
In order to improve the clarity of the
HHS Select Agent Regulations, we are
proposing to add the following
definitions to 42 CFR 73.1, to clarify the
terms related to the identification of a
Restricted person: Adjudicated as a
mental defective, Alien, Crime
punishable by imprisonment for a term
exceeding 1 year, Committed to any
mental institution, Controlled
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
61213
substance, Indictment, Information
security; Lawfully admitted for
permanent residence, Mental
institution, and Unlawful user of any
controlled substance. We believe that
these definitions will assist Responsible
Officials as well as those seeking
approval to access select agents and
toxins to better understand what status
or activities, past or present, might
prohibit such access.
Although these terms were undefined
in the Bioterrorism Response Act, it is
evident that Congress modeled many of
them after the disqualifiers that are used
by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) when
enforcing the Gun Control Act of 1968.
Because the purpose of the Select Agent
Program differs from ATF’s enforcement
actions under the Gun Control Act, we
do not believe that these terms must be
defined exactly the same. The Gun
Control Act regulates access to firearms,
while the Bioterrorism Response Act
regulates access to biological agents and
toxins that the government has
recognized as having the potential to be
used as weapons of mass destruction by
the wrong hands.
Nevertheless, we looked at the
statutory and regulatory definitions of
these terms under the Gun Control Act
when drafting our definitions. With the
exception of the term ‘‘crime punishable
by imprisonment for a term exceeding 1
year,’’ we decided to adopt the
applicable definitions used by ATF.
We are proposing to define a ‘‘crime
punishable by imprisonment for a term
exceeding 1 year’’ as ‘‘any Federal,
State, or foreign offense for which the
maximum penalty, whether or not
imposed, is capital punishment or
imprisonment in excess of 1 year. What
constitutes a conviction of such a crime
shall be determined in accordance with
the law of the jurisdiction in which the
proceedings were held. Any conviction
that has been set aside or nullified as a
matter of law or for which a person has
been pardoned shall not be considered
a conviction for purposes of this part.’’
Contrary to definition of this term used
under the Gun Control Act, we have
decided that foreign offenses should be
considered a disqualifier. In doing so we
are aware of the Supreme Court’s
decision in Small v. United States, 544
U.S. 385 (2005) in which the court,
interpreting the provisions of 18 U.S.C.
922(g)(1), held that phrase ‘‘convicted in
any court’’ refers only to U.S. courts, not
to foreign courts. In its opinion
interpreting the Gun Control Act, the
court stated that ‘‘the statute itself and
its history offer only congressional
silence’’ as to whether Congress
considered whether the statutory
E:\FR\FM\03OCP2.SGM
03OCP2
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
61214
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 / Proposed Rules
language included foreign convictions.
In the case of the Public Health Security
and Bioterrorism Preparedness and
Response Act of 2002 (Bioterrorism and
Response Act), we believe Congress
spoke clearly about their desire to limit
or deny access to select agents and
toxins for those who have committed
serious crimes regardless of where
committed.
We believe that in light of the threat
of bioterrorism attacks, Congress would
not want to exclude an individual
convicted of a U.S. offense from having
access to BSAT, but still allow access to
an individual convicted in a foreign
court of a similar offense.
As a part of the safeguard and security
section of the Bioterrorism Response
Act, Congress not only put select agents
and toxins off limits to a ‘‘restricted
person,’’ as that term is defined by 18
U.S.C. 175b, but to those who are
‘‘reasonably suspected by any Federal
law enforcement or intelligence agency
of’’ (1) committing a ‘‘Federal crime of
terrorism’’ transcending national
boundaries (18 U.S.C. 2332b), (2) the
knowing involvement with an
organization that engages in domestic or
international terrorism or with any other
organization that engages in
international crimes of violence; or (3)
being an agent of a foreign power. We
believe it would be an inconsistent
reading of statutory authority to allow
the Secretary to limit or deny access to
select agents and toxins to someone
identified by the Attorney General as
being reasonably suspected of
committing a Federal crime of terrorism
transcending national boundaries but to
be powerless in cases where a person
had actually been convicted of a serious
crime in a foreign country. We also
believe that the instances of regulation
can be distinguished in that with regard
to the Gun Control Act of 1968, the
government is regulating access to guns
while with respect to the Bioterrorism
Response Act, the government is
regulating access to biological agents
and toxins that the government has
recognized as having the potential to be
used in the wrong hands as weapons of
mass destruction.
We specifically request comments on
the use of a foreign conviction as a
predicate for denying access to select
agents and toxins. We recognize that
there can be significant differences
between foreign convictions and
domestic convictions. For example,
foreign legal systems may not provide
the same due process safeguards
afforded to citizens of the United States,
including impartial tribunals and jury
trials. Additionally, foreign countries
may punish conduct that is permitted
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:10 Sep 30, 2011
Jkt 226001
under domestic law or may require
more severe penalties than under
domestic law. We note that in the past,
courts have applied the criteria set forth
in Section 482 of the Restatement (third)
of Foreign Relations Law of the United
States (1986) in determining whether a
foreign judgment should be recognized
in the United States. That Section
provides that a court in the United
States may not recognize a judgment of
the court of a foreign state if the
judgment was rendered under a judicial
system that does not provide impartial
tribunals or procedures compatible with
due process of law or the court that
rendered the judgment did not have
jurisdiction over the defendant in
accordance with the law of the
rendering state. It further provides that
a court in the United States need not
recognize a judgment of the court of a
foreign state if the court that rendered
the judgment did not have jurisdiction
of the subject matter of the action, the
defendant did not receive notice of the
proceedings in sufficient time to enable
him to defend, the judgment was
obtained by fraud, the cause of action on
which the judgment was based, or the
judgment itself, is repugnant to the
public policy of the United States or of
the State where recognition is sought,
the judgment conflicts with another
final judgment that is entitled to
recognition, or the proceeding in the
foreign court was contrary to an
agreement between the parties to submit
the controversy on which the judgment
is based to another forum. We are
seeking comment on whether these
criteria should be applied in
considering whether access to select
agents and toxins should be denied
based on a foreign conviction or
whether other criteria or factors would
be appropriate to consider.
Also, contrary to the definition used
by ATF, we are proposing that a state
offense classified by the laws of that
state as a misdemeanor, but which has
a term of imprisonment exceeding one
year, should be considered a
disqualifier—even though an individual
convicted of the same offense would not
be disqualified under the Gun Control
Act. Finally, we are proposing to permit
access to BSAT to individuals who have
been convicted of a disqualifying
offense if their convictions have been
set aside or nullified as a matter of law
or they have been pardoned. Although
such language was not specifically
included in the Bioterrorism Response
Act, we believe that we should take into
account certain post-conviction actions
when determining whether we should
deny an individual access to BSAT.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
We are proposing to add a definition
for Occupational exposure based on the
definition used in the Occupational
Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) regulations found in 29 CFR
1910.1030. In addition, we are
proposing to add the definitions for
Recombinant and Synthetic Nucleic
Acids to clarify the existing regulations,
as the term ‘‘recombinant nucleic acids’’
is employed but not defined, and
synthetic nucleic acids are not currently
addressed in the HHS Select Agent
Regulations.
Recombinant/Synthetic Nucleic Acids
In addition to adding the proposed
definition for Recombinant and
Synthetic Nucleic Acids, we are also
proposing to add the phrase ‘‘and/or
synthetic’’ after the word
‘‘Recombinant’’ throughout 73.3 (c) and
73.4 (c). Current regulations regarding
recombinant nucleic acids and
recombinant organisms focus solely on
the use of recombinant technology in
the generation of these genetic elements.
Since synthetic DNA technology may
also be used to generate such genetic
elements, we are proposing to expand
the category of genetic elements to
include recombinant and/or synthetic
DNA.
Toxins
Sections in §§ 73.3 and 73.4 of 42 CFR
contain provisions for toxins regulated
by HHS under part 73. In 42 CFR 73.3(e)
and 73.4(e), we are proposing to clarify
that the ‘‘inactive form of a select toxin’’
may be excluded from regulation since
the current term, ‘‘attenuated strain of
toxin’’ is scientifically inaccurate.
‘‘Attenuated’’ is a term that is applied to
living organisms and toxins are not
living organisms. Since ‘‘Inactive form
of a select toxin’’ is a more accurate
term, we are proposing to amend the
regulations to include the correct
terminology.
Section 42 CFR 73.3(d)(3) specifies
the permissible select toxin amounts
under the control of a principal
investigator, treating physician or
veterinarian, or commercial
manufacturer or distributor that are
excluded from the requirements of the
select agent regulations. We are
proposing to require that the person
transferring toxins in amounts which
would otherwise be excluded from the
provisions of the select agent
regulations would be excluded only if
the transferor: (1) Can show that the
transferor used due diligence (i.e.,
reasonably justified by a prophylactic,
protective, bona fide research, or other
peaceful purpose) to assure that the
recipient has a legitimate need to handle
E:\FR\FM\03OCP2.SGM
03OCP2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 / Proposed Rules
or use such toxins; and (2) reports to
CDC if they detect a known or suspected
violation of Federal law or become
aware of suspicious activity related to
the toxin. The HHS Secretary would
also retain the authority to, without
prior notification, inspect and copy or
request the submission of the due
diligence documentation. It should be
noted that this proposed requirement
would not apply to toxins exempted
under Section 42 CFR 73.5(c).
We are proposing to add 42 CFR
73.3(d)(4) which would state,
‘‘Notwithstanding section (i) above, an
animal inoculated with or exposed to an
HHS select toxin.’’ The current
regulations consider that an animal
injected with or exposed to (e.g., by
inhalation, dermal absorption, or
ingestion) a select toxin is a ‘‘select
toxin’’ itself and would need to be
housed in a registered space. This
change would allow animals injected
with or exposed to a select toxin to not
be considered a ‘‘select toxin.’’
Therefore, the animals would not need
to be housed in a registered space. This
change will eliminate an unnecessary
burden on a registered entity because
recovering the toxin from within an
animal subject is highly difficult and
such removal is unlikely to produce a
reasonable yield of recovery. In
addition, there is uncertainty as to
whether the toxin would remain active
when recovered from the animal. For
these reasons, it is highly unlikely that
once introduced into an animal,
sufficient toxin would be able to be
recovered to pose a significant hazard to
public health.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Exemptions
The regulations found in 42 CFR 73.5
and 73.6 requires identified select
agents listed on the CDC’s Category A
Bioterrorism Agents list (i.e., agents that
pose a risk to national security because
they can be easily disseminated or
transmitted from person to person;
result in high mortality rates and have
the potential for major public health
impact; might cause public panic and
social disruption; and require special
action for public health preparedness)
contained in a specimen presented for
diagnosis or verification to be
immediately reported to APHIS or CDC
by telephone, facsimile, or e-mail.
We are proposing to amend this
immediate notification to only those
select agents and toxins identified as
Tier 1 agents because these agents and
toxins present the greatest risk of
deliberate misuse with the most
significant potential for mass casualties.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:10 Sep 30, 2011
Jkt 226001
Responsible Official
The regulations found in 42 CFR 73.9
set out requirements for entities
requesting to work with select agents
and toxins to designate a Responsible
Official, who ensures that the entity
meets the requirements of the
regulations.
We are proposing to add a specific
requirement that all Responsible
Officials possess the appropriate
training or expertise to execute their
required duties. We are also proposing
to add a requirement that the
Responsible Official’s regular place of
employment or principal duty station
must be collocated in close proximity
with the physical location of the
registered entity entered in section 1A
of APHIS/CDC Form 1 (Application for
Registration for Possession, Use, and
Transfer of Select Agents and Toxins
OMB Control No. 0579–0213, OMB
Control No. 0920–0576, Expiration Date
12/31/2011). We believe that the
Responsible Official should have a
physical (and not merely a telephonic or
audio/visual) presence at the entity to
ensure that the entity is in compliance
with the select agent regulations and be
able to quickly respond to on-site
incidents involving select agents and
toxins.
We are also proposing to clarify the
role of Alternate Responsible Official in
order to definitively establish that the
Alternate Responsible Official must
have the knowledge and authority to act
for the Responsible Official in his/her
absence.
Access to Select Agents and Toxins
We are proposing to amend the
regulations in 42 CFR 73.10. These
regulations establish parameters for
restricting access to select agents and
toxins and the process by which
individuals may be approved by HHS/
CDC or USDA/APHIS for access to
select agents and toxins after the
completion of a security risk assessment
by the Attorney General. Specifically,
we are proposing to add new provisions
by which individuals may have access
to select agents and toxins at entities
other than the individual’s ‘‘home’’
entity.
We are also proposing to decrease the
maximum length of time in which a
security risk assessment will be valid
from five years to three years in order
to more expeditiously identify
individuals who may have fallen into
one of the prohibited or restricted
categories.
Security Plan
The regulations in 42 CFR 73.11
establish the requirements for
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
61215
developing and implementing a security
plan sufficient to safeguard select agents
or toxins against unauthorized access,
theft, loss, or release. The regulations
currently require that the security plan
must be submitted by all regulated
entities upon request. We are proposing
to amend § 73.11 to require that the
security plan be submitted for initial
registration and renewals of registration.
Since we believe animals and plants
exposed to or infected with a select
agent should be handled as a select
agent and safeguarded in the same
manner as a select agent, we are
proposing to require that the security
plan include provisions to address
safeguarding of animals or plants
intentionally or exposed to or infected
with select agents against unauthorized
access, theft, loss or release. We are not
requiring this plan to address
procedures concerning animals exposed
to toxins because, as discussed above, it
is highly unlikely that once introduced
into an animal, sufficient toxin can be
recovered to pose a significant hazard to
public health and safety. We are
additionally proposing to add a
requirement that the security plan
include procedures for the Responsible
Official to immediately notify the
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) of
suspicious activity that may be criminal
in nature and related to the entity, its
personnel, or its select agents or toxins.
We believe that any criminal activity of
this kind should be immediately and
directly reported to the FBI so they can
initiate an investigation or other
appropriate response.
We are proposing that the security
plans of entities with select agents and
toxins must include provisions for
information security. These information
security provisions would include
network connectivity monitoring,
restriction of user permissions so that
only mission-specific files and
applications may be accessed, measures
to prevent network infiltration by
malicious code, configuration
management including regular patching
and system and software updates, and
backup security measures in the event
that access control systems and/or
surveillance devices are rendered
inoperable. We believe that information
security enhancements are important
because the security of records or
information systems that could allow an
individual to gain access to the select
agents or toxins should be safeguarded
to prevent unauthorized access, theft,
loss, or release of these materials.
We are proposing to codify current
practices for shipping, receiving, and
storage of select agents and toxins to
ensure that the entity has documented
E:\FR\FM\03OCP2.SGM
03OCP2
61216
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 / Proposed Rules
processes for securing and monitoring
the shipment, receipt, and storage of
these items. These changes would serve
to decrease the chance that such
materials would be made available to an
unauthorized individual or an
individual without a legitimate use for
the material.
We are also proposing to remove the
reference in 73.11(e), ‘‘Laboratory
Security and Emergency Response
Guidance for Laboratories Working with
Select Agents’’ in Morbidity and
Mortality Weekly Report (December 6,
2002) because we posted a security
information guidance document in
March 2007 that supersedes this
reference.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Biosafety Plan
We are proposing to amend the
regulations in 42 CFR 73.12 to require
that a regulated entity’s biosafety plan
address procedures concerning animals
or plants accidentally or intentionally
exposed to or infected with a select
agent. We are not requiring this plan to
address procedures concerning animals
exposed to toxins. As stated previously,
this is because it is highly unlikely that
once introduced into an animal,
sufficient toxin can be recovered to pose
a significant hazard to public health,
agriculture or agriculture products.
We are also proposing that the
biosafety plan must include provisions
for the implementation of an
occupational health program for
individuals with access to Tier 1 select
agents and toxins. We believe aspects of
an individual’s health may be relevant
to their suitability to access biological
select agents and toxins; identification
of potential health problems and review
of medication or treatment that may
affect security and safety is paramount;
and, occupational health programs
should inform scientists of the types of
medications and treatments that might
have a potential deleterious effect on
working safely and securely with select
agents and toxins.
Restricted Experiments
The regulations in 42 CFR 73.13
concern restricted experiments that may
not be performed unless approved by
the HHS Secretary. We are proposing to
add language in order to expand the
current ‘‘restricted experiment’’
approval requirement to include all
experiments involving the creation of
drug resistant select agents that are not
known to acquire the resistance
naturally, if such acquisition could
compromise the use of the drug to
control disease agents in humans,
veterinary medicine, or agriculture and
not just those involving recombinant
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:10 Sep 30, 2011
Jkt 226001
DNA. The regulations in 42 CFR 73.13
concern restricted experiments which
may not be performed unless approved
by the HHS Secretary. Furthermore, we
are proposing to state that, in addition
to the existing prohibition on
conducting restricted experiments
without express approval, entities may
not possess the products (i.e., creation
of drug resistant select agents that are
not known to acquire the resistance
naturally, if such acquisition could
compromise the use of the drug to
control disease agents in humans,
veterinary medicine, or agriculture, or
recombinant and or synthetic DNA
containing genes for the biosynthesis of
select toxins lethal for vertebrates at an
LD[50] < 100 ng/kg body weight
resulting from restricted experiments)
resulting from restricted experiments
without the express approval of the
HHS Secretary. We are also proposing to
remove recombinant technology as the
only determining factor for a restricted
experiment. Current regulations
regarding restricted experiments focus
solely on the use of recombinant
technology in the generation of drug
resistant select agents or biosynthesis of
toxins lethal to vertebrates. Since
synthetic DNA technology or selection
in sublethal exposures may also be used
to generate such products, we are
proposing to expand the category of
restricted experiments to include
passive selection, recombinant and/or
synthetic DNA.
Incident Response
The regulations in 42 CFR 73.14
contain requirements for development
of incident response plans. We are
proposing to specify that each entity’s
incident response plan be based upon a
site-specific risk assessment. We believe
this change would further ensure the
specificity and quality of the plan. In
addition, we are proposing that the
incident response procedures contain
specific provisions concerning animals
or plants accidentally or intentionally
exposed to or infected with a select
agent. We are not requiring this plan to
address procedures concerning animals
exposed to toxins. As stated previously,
this is because it is highly unlikely that
once introduced into an animal,
sufficient toxin can be recovered to pose
a significant hazard to public health,
agriculture or agriculture products.
Training
We are proposing to amend the
regulations in 42 CFR 73.15 that contain
provisions of mandatory training for
staff and visitors who work in or visit
areas where select agents or toxins are
handled or stored to provide security
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
awareness and incident response
training. We believe these additional
training initiatives are needed to ensure
that (1) personnel will be better trained
to safeguard select agents and toxins
from thefts, losses, intentional releases,
or unauthorized access and (2)
personnel will be better trained to
ensure that select agents and toxins are
safeguarded during exigent
circumstances that include natural and
man-made disasters. We are also
proposing to clarify the language
regarding the level of training that staff
and visitors would be required to
receive in order to establish that training
for escorted personnel based on the risk
associated with accessing areas where
select agents and toxins are used and/
or stored. Currently, refresher training is
required to be provided once a year. We
are proposing to require that such
training also be provided if a registered
entity’s security, incident response, or
biosafety plans are substantively altered.
Finally, we are proposing to specify that
the Responsible Official ensure
maintenance of training records.
Currently, there is no particular person
designated as the entity’s required
record keeper, only that a training
record must be kept.
Transfers
The transportation in commerce of
hazardous materials, including select
agents and toxins, is governed by the
United States Department of
Transportation’s Hazardous Material
Regulations found in Title 49 of the
Code of Federal Regulations, parts 100–
185. The regulations in 42 CFR 73.16 do
not impose requirements on the
transportation in commerce of select
agents or toxins. We are proposing to
clarify when ‘‘transportation in
commerce’’ begins and ends to better
allow registered individuals and entities
to adequately address those situations
when a select agent or toxin is (1) ready
to be packaged for transportation, (2)
packaged for shipment, or (3) received
and handled by a person with approval
to access select agents and toxins. In
addition, we are proposing language to
codify policies and practices into a
standard for shipping, receiving, and
storage of select agents and toxins to
ensure that the entity has documented
processes for securing and monitoring
the shipment, receipt, and storage of
select agents and toxins that make it
extremely unlikely that such materials
would be made available to an
unauthorized individual or an
individual without a legitimate use for
the material. We note the concerns
identified in two HHS Office of
Inspector General (OIG) audits regarding
E:\FR\FM\03OCP2.SGM
03OCP2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 / Proposed Rules
vulnerabilities that may occur during
the shipment of select agents and toxins.
HHS/CDC reviewed how entities ship
select agents and toxins and evaluated
ways to improve this process to ensure
they are not only safeguarded against
unauthorized access, but also against
theft, loss, or release. We believe that
the proposed amendments will help
address OIG’s concerns.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Records
The regulations in 42 CFR 73.17
address recordkeeping requirements for
regulated entities as those records that
relate to select agents and toxins. We are
proposing to clarify the current language
that an accurate, current inventory
needs to be maintained for each select
agent that the entity possesses including
synthetic select agent organisms and
any animals or plants intentionally or
unintentionally exposed to or infected
with a select agent (including number
and species, location and appropriate
disposition). We believe this
clarification is needed to ensure that
accurate, current records are maintained
for all select agents that the entity
possesses. We are currently soliciting
comments from the public (as well as
affected agencies) concerning our
proposed information collection and
recordkeeping requirements. Please
send written comments to Daniel
Holcomb, CDC Acting Reports Clearance
Officer, 1600 Clifton Road, MS–D74,
Atlanta, GA 30333 or send an e-mail to
omb@cdc.gov. Please state that your
comments refer to Possession, Use, and
Transfer of Select Agents and Toxins
(OMB Control No. 0920–0576).
As previously stated, we are not
proposing to require regulated entities
to keep records regarding animals
exposed to toxins because it is highly
unlikely that once introduced into an
animal, sufficient toxin can be
recovered to pose a significant hazard to
public health, agriculture or agriculture
products.
Administrative Review
We are proposing to amend the
regulations in 42 CFR 73.20 that
addresses the administrative review of
an individual or entity’s denial,
revocation, or suspension of registration
and access approval. Specifically, we
are proposing to modify the current
regulations in order to allow individuals
more time to gather the necessary
components of their appeal following
the denial, limitation, or revocation of
access approval. Currently, this process
must be initiated in 30 calendar days.
We are proposing to extend the deadline
to 180 calendar days. We believe this
change would provide individuals with
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:10 Sep 30, 2011
Jkt 226001
sufficient time to gather all documents
necessary to support an appeal. Finally,
we are proposing to remove the
provision ‘‘Where the denial,
revocation, or suspension of an
individual’s access approval is based
upon identification by the Attorney
General, the request for review will be
forwarded to the Attorney General’’ to
provide clarification that the decision
regarding the appeal is determined by
the HHS Secretary.
Guidance Documents
We are specifically requesting
comments from the regulated
community and any other interested
persons on the development of one or
more guidance documents that would
serve to provide assistance in the
interpretation of the select agent
regulations.
The areas where guidance documents
may be developed in relation to the
select agent regulations include, but are
not limited to:
1. Aspects of the required security
plan. These may include, but are not
limited to:
• Standards for information security;
• Development of suitability or
personnel reliability practices,
including pre-access and ongoing
assessment processes of persons who
will have access to Tier 1 select agents
or toxins;
• Procedures for the method by
which an entity’s Responsible Official
will coordinate his or her efforts with
the entity’s safety and security
professionals to ensure security of Tier
1 select agents or toxins and have access
to relevant information from all
professionals dealing with biological
select agents and toxins safety and
security;
• Development of a self- and peerreporting program to track incidents or
conditions that could affect an
individual’s ability to safely access or
work with Tier 1 select agents and
toxins; and
• Layered physical security
protection of assets for entities housing
Tier 1 select agents and toxins.
2. Aspects of the required biosafety
plan, e.g., components of an
occupational health program for
individuals with access to Tier 1 select
agents and toxins; and
3. Aspects of the required training,
e.g., best practices for development of a
security awareness training program.
We welcome public comment on the
use of Web sites, articles, or other
sources that may be used to develop
such documents, in addition to
suggestions as to what elements should
be included as useful examples. These
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
61217
documents would serve as a resource to
the regulated community as a whole.
III. Required Regulatory Analyses
a. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility.
Under E.O. 12866 HHS must
determine whether a regulatory action is
‘‘significant.’’ A ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under E.O. 12866 is defined as
(1) an action that is likely to result in
a rule that may have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more, or
adversely and materially affects a sector
of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or state, local or
tribal governments or communities (or
an economically significant action);
(2) creates a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interferes with an action
taken or planned by another agency;
(3) materially alters the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees
or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients; or (4) raises
novel legal or policy issues. Because
this rulemaking proposes changes to
how a subset of select agents and toxins
are protected, this rule is has been
determined to be ‘‘significant’’ under
E.O. 12866 and, therefore, has been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).
We have prepared an economic
analysis for this rule. The economic
analysis provides a cost-benefit analysis,
as required by E.O. 12866, and an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis (See III.b.)
that examines the potential economic
effects of this proposed rule on small
entities, as required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. The economic analysis
is summarized below. Copies of the full
analysis are available by contacting the
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT or on the Federal
Select Agent Program Web site at:
https://www.selectagents.gov/ or on the
public docket at https://
www.regulations.gov.
E:\FR\FM\03OCP2.SGM
03OCP2
61218
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Summary of the Regulatory Impact
Analysis
Certain pathogens or biological toxins
that are released intentionally or
accidentally can result in disease, wideranging and devastating impacts on the
economy, disruption to society,
diminished confidence in public and
private institutions, and large-scale loss
of life. People or livestock can be
exposed to these agents from inhalation,
through the skin, or by the ingestion of
contaminated food, feed, or water.
Similarly, crops can be exposed to
biological pathogens in several ways—at
the seed stage, in the field, or after
harvest.
The Public Health Security and
Bioterrorism Preparedness and
Response Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107–188)
(the Act) provides for the regulation of
certain biological agents and toxins that
have the potential to pose a severe
threat to both human and animal health,
to plant health, or to animal and plant
products. APHIS and CDC have the
primary responsibility for implementing
the provisions of the Act within USDA
and HHS, respectively. Within APHIS,
Veterinary Services (VS) select agents
and toxins are those that have been
determined to have the potential to pose
a severe threat to animal health or
animal products, and Plant Protection
and Quarantine (PPQ) select agents and
toxins are those that have been
determined to have the potential to pose
a severe threat to plant health or plant
products. HHS select agents and toxins
are those that have been determined to
have the potential to pose a severe
threat to human health. APHIS and CDC
coordinate regulatory activities for
overlap select agents and toxins that
have been determined to pose a severe
threat to human and to animal health or
animal products.
Sections 201 and 212(a)(2) of the Act
requires a biennial review and
republication of the select agent and
toxin list, with revisions as appropriate
in accordance with this law. See
42 U.S.C. 262a(a)(2) and 7 U.S.C.
8401(a)(2), respectively. This rule would
implement the recommendations of the
third biennial review of the list.
Furthermore, revision of these
regulations would incorporate the
recommendations developed as a result
of E.O. 13546, ‘‘Optimizing the Security
of Biological Select Agents and Toxins
in the United States,’’ which requires
that the HHS and USDA Secretaries
publish proposed regulations to
establish risk-based tiering of the select
agent list, and revise the regulations,
rules, and guidance to accommodate a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:10 Sep 30, 2011
Jkt 226001
tiered select agent list no later than
October 2011.
In addition, we are proposing several
amendments to the regulations,
including the addition of definitions
and clarification of language concerning
security, training, biosafety/
biocontainment, and incident response.
These changes would increase the
applicability and effectiveness of the
select agent regulations and provide for
enhanced program oversight. This rule
would update the USDA, HHS, and
overlap select agent and toxin lists. The
regulation of select agents and toxins is
intended to prevent their misuse and
thereby reduce the potential for those
pathogens to harm humans, animals,
animal products, plants or plant
products in the United States. Should
any select agent or toxin be
intentionally or unintentionally released
into the environment, the consequences
would be significant. Consequences
could include disruption of markets,
difficulties in sustaining an adequate
food and fiber supply, and the potential
spread of disease infestations over large
areas. The entities most likely to be
affected by this rule would be those
laboratories and other institutions
conducting research and related
activities that involve the use of the
newly categorized Tier 1 select agents
and toxins. The impact of the changes
to the regulations is expected to be
minimal. Based on information obtained
through site-specific inspections, we
believe that very few entities would
incur significant costs for compliance.
Many of the proposed changes to the
regulations would impose an added
time cost to measures already required
for compliance, with respect to security,
biocontainment/biosafety, and incident
response plans, information security,
and ongoing background checks. While
the total cost of the proposed
regulations is estimated to range
between $4.9 million and $6.4 million,
we believe many of these costs are
currently incurred by affected entities as
generally recognized practices. Costs
actually incurred would depend upon
the number of computers and facility
systems that require the proposed
enhanced security. The expected
benefits of strengthened safeguards
against the unintentional or deliberate
release of a select agent or toxin exceed
the estimated costs of the proposed
measures. Based on the information we
have, there is no reason to conclude that
adoption of this proposed rule would
result in any significant economic effect
on a substantial number of small
entities. The entities are those
laboratories and other institutions
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
conducting research and related
activities entities in possession of Tier
1 select agents or toxins, and, to a
somewhat lesser extent, those entities
possessing the newly added select
agents and toxins. The economic
analysis presents categories and
information from the Department of
Commerce and the Small Business
Administration for those entities we
have identified as most likely to be
affected by this rule. While we believe
affected entities are contained within
these categories, we are seeking further
information regarding how many
entities fall specifically into each
category, and are therefore, inviting
comments on potential effects. In
particular, we are interested in
determining the number and kind of
small entities that may incur benefits or
costs from the implementation of this
proposed rule.
This proposed rule would update the
APHIS, CDC, and overlap select agent
and toxin lists. The regulation of select
agents and toxins is intended to prevent
their misuse and thereby reduce the
potential for those pathogens to harm
humans, animals, animal products,
plants or plant products in the United
States. Should any select agent or toxin
be intentionally or unintentionally
released into the environment, the
consequences would be significant.
Consequences could include disruption
of markets, difficulties in sustaining an
adequate food and fiber supply, and the
potential spread of disease infestations
over large areas. The entities most likely
to be affected by this rule would be
those laboratories and other institutions
conducting research and related
activities that involve the use of the
newly categorized Tier 1 select agents
and toxins. The impact of the changes
to the regulations is expected to be
minimal, however. Based on
information obtained through sitespecific inspections, indications are that
very few entities would incur significant
costs for compliance. Many of the
proposed changes to the regulations
would impose an added cost of the time
spent on documenting measures already
required for compliance, with respect to
security, biocontainment/biosafety, and
incident response plans, information
security, and ongoing background
checks. While the total costs imposed by
the proposed regulations are estimated
to range between $5.30 million and
$6.95 million, including costs to
government, we believe many of these
costs are incurred through observance of
generally recognized industry standards.
Costs actually incurred would depend
upon the extent to which current facility
E:\FR\FM\03OCP2.SGM
03OCP2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
practices will need to be enhanced
based on the proposed requirements.
The expected benefits of strengthened
safeguards against the costs associated
with unintentional or deliberate release
of select agents or toxins would greatly
exceed the estimated costs of the
proposed measures. The cost associated
with a single outbreak have been known
to exceed $100 million as outlined in
the Regulatory Impact Analysis.
Deliberate introduction greatly increases
the probability of a select agent or toxin
becoming established and causing wideranging and devastating impacts on an
economy, loss of market access for
consumer goods and services,
disruption to society, and diminished
confidence in public and private
institutions.
This analysis reviews expected
benefits and costs of the proposed rule
in accordance with Executive Orders
12866 and 13563. Possible impacts for
small entities are also considered as
required by the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, which requires agencies to prepare
and make available for public comment
an initial regulatory flexibility analysis
that describes expected impacts of a
proposed rule on small businesses,
small organizations and small
governmental jurisdictions.
Based on the information we have,
there is no reason to conclude that
adoption of this proposed rule would
result in any significant economic effect
on a substantial number of small
entities. However, we do not currently
have all of the data necessary for a
comprehensive analysis of the effects of
this proposed rule on small entities.
Therefore, we are inviting comments on
potential effects. In particular, we are
interested in determining the number
and kind of small entities that may
incur benefits or costs from the
implementation of this proposed rule.
b. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires an agency
to consider the potential impact of its
regulations on small entities, including
small businesses, small governmental
units, and small not-for-profit
organizations. We certify that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities within the meaning of the RFA.
Therefore, a regulatory flexibility
analysis as provided for under the RFA
is not required.
c. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
In accordance with section 3507(d) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:10 Sep 30, 2011
Jkt 226001
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information
collection or recordkeeping
requirements included in this proposed
rule have been submitted for approval to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Please send written comments
to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attention:
Desk Officer for APHIS, Washington, DC
20503. Please state that your comments
refer to Docket Nos. APHIS–2009–0070
and CDC–2011–0012. Please send a
copy of your comments to: (1) Docket
Nos. APHIS–APHIS–2009–0070 and
CDC–2011–0012, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
3A–03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238, and (2)
Clearance Officer, OCIO, USDA, room
404–W, 14th Street and Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250. A
comment to OMB is best assured of
having its full effect if OMB receives it
within 30 days of publication of this
proposed rule.
The Bioterrorism Preparedness Act is
designed to prevent, prepare for and
respond to bioterrorism and other
public health emergencies. The law
requires individuals possessing agents
or toxins deemed a severe threat to
human, animal, or plant health, or to
animal or plant products, to be
registered with the Secretary of
Agriculture or the Secretary of Health
and Human Services, unless they have
been specifically exempted.
This proposed rule entails the use of
a number of separate forms designed to
obtain critical information concerning
individuals or entities in possession of
certain agents or toxins, as well as the
specific characteristics of the agents or
toxins—including name, strain, and
genetic information. This data is
needed, in part, to allow APHIS and
CDC to determine the biosafety level of
an entity as well as the entity’s
biosecurity situation. This, in turn,
helps APHIS and CDC ensure that
appropriate safeguard, containment, and
disposal requirements commensurate
with the risk of the agent or toxin are
present at the entity, thus preventing
access to such agents and toxins for use
in domestic or international terrorism.
Facilities containing select agents will
be required to maintain records on
animals and plants, and revise their
Biosafety/Biocontainment Plan and
Incident Response Plan for review by
APHIS and CDC upon request.
Information to determine that
individuals seeking to register have a
lawful purpose to possess, use, or
transfer agents or toxins will also be
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
61219
requested as part of the registration
process. In addition, we will be
requesting submission of their Security
Plan for our review.
APHIS and CDC are asking OMB to
approve, for 3 years, the use of these
information collections, associated with
its efforts to more closely regulate select
agents or toxins that could be used to
commit acts of domestic or international
terrorism. We are soliciting comments
from the public (as well as affected
agencies) concerning this information
collection activity. APHIS and CDC
need this outside input to help
accomplish the following:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information collection is necessary for
the proper performance of our agency’s
functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of our
estimate of the burden of the proposed
information collection, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
information collection on those who are
to respond (such as through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses).
Estimate of burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 2.3187883 hours
per response.
Respondents: Researchers,
universities, research and development
organizations, commercial
manufacturers, non-profit institutions,
diagnostic laboratories and other
interested parties who possess, use, or
transfer agents or toxins deemed a
severe threat to human, animal or plant
health, or to animal or plant products.
Estimated annual number of
respondents: 386.
Estimated annual number of
responses per respondent: 12.230569.
Estimated annual number of
responses: 4,721.
Estimated total annual burden on
respondents: 10,947 hours. (Due to
averaging, the total annual burden hours
may not equal the product of the annual
number of responses multiplied by the
reporting burden per response.)
E:\FR\FM\03OCP2.SGM
03OCP2
61220
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Number of
respondents
Section
Form name
9 CFR 121.5 and 6, 7 CFR 331.5,
43 CFR 73.5 and 6.
§ 121.7, § 331.7, § 73.7 .....................
§ 121.7, § 331.7, § 73.7 .....................
Report of Identification of a Select
Agent or Toxin.
Application for Registration ..............
Amendment to a Certificate of Registration.
Security Plan ....................................
Biosafety/Biocontainment Plan ........
Request Regarding a Restricted Experiment.
Incident Response Plan ...................
Training ............................................
Request to Transfer Select Agents
and Toxins.
Records ............................................
Notification of Theft, Loss, or Release.
§ 121.11, § 331.11, § 73.11 ...............
§ 121.12, § 331.12, § 73.12 ...............
§ 121.13, § 331.13, § 73.13 ...............
§ 121.14, § 331.14, § 73.14 ...............
§ 121.15, § 331.15, § 73.15 ...............
§ 121.16, § 331.16, § 73.16 ...............
§ 121.17, § 331.17, § 73.17 ...............
§ 121.19, § 331.19, § 73.19 ...............
Copies of this information collection
can be obtained from Mrs. Celeste
Sickles, APHIS’ Information Collection
Coordinator, at (301) 851–2908.
d. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice
Reform
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform.
If this proposed rule is adopted: (1) All
State and local laws and regulations that
are inconsistent with this rule will be
preempted; (2) no retroactive effect will
be given to this rule; and (3)
administrative proceedings will not be
required before parties may file suit in
court challenging this rule.
e. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This rule has been reviewed under
E.O. 13132, Federalism. The rule does
not impose any regulation that would
preempt State, local, and Indian Tribe
requirements, or that would have any
substantial direct effects on the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
f. Plain Writing Act of 2010
Under Public Law 111–274 (October
24, 2010), executive branch
Departments and Agencies are required
to use plain language in documents that
explain to the public how to comply
with a requirement the Federal
Government administers or enforces.
HHS has attempted to use plain
language in promulgating the proposed
rule consistent with the Federal Plain
Writing Act guidelines.
IV. References
1. Delgado, Erickson, et al., 2008. Chapare
virus, a newly discovered arenavirus
isolated from a fatal hemorrhagic fever
case in Bolivia. PLoS Pathogens
4:e1000047.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:10 Sep 30, 2011
Jkt 226001
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
Total
burden
hours
161
3
1
299
7
380
1
7
5
1
35
1,955
380
380
160
1
1
1
5
8
2
1,900
3,040
320
380
380
290
1
1
1
5
1
2
1,900
380
580
295
195
1
1
0.5
2
148
390
2. Briese T, Paweska JT, McMullan LK,
Hutchison SK, Street C, Palacios G,
Khristova ML, Weyer J, Swanepoel R,
Egholm M, Nichol ST, Lipkin WI.
Genetic detection and characterization of
Lujo virus, a new hemorrhagic feverassociated arenavirus from southern
Africa. PLoS 2009 May; 5(5):e1000455.
Epub 2009 May 29. Available at https://
www.plospathogens.org.
3. Galgiani, J.N. 1999. Coccidiomycosis: a
regional disease of national importance.
Ann Intern. Med. 130:293–298.
4. Arrigo NC, Adams AP, Weaver SC.
Evolutionary patterns of eastern equine
encephalitis virus in North versus South
America suggest ecological differences
and taxonomic revision. J Virol. 2010
Jan; 84(2):1014–25.
´
´
´
5. Gresıkova M, Kaluzova M, 1997. Biology
of tick-borne encephalitis virus. Acta
Virol. Apr; 41(2):115–24.
6. Ecker M, Allison SL, Meixner T, Heinz FX,
1999. Sequence analysis and genetic
classification of tick-borne encephalitis
viruses from Europe and Asia. J Gen
Virol. Jan; 80 (Pt 1):179–85.
7. Bergdoll, M. S., 1988. Monkey feeding test
for staphylococcal enterotoxin. Methods
Enzymol 165: 324–33.
8. Bergdoll, M. S., C. R. Borja, et al., 1971.
Identification of enterotoxin E. Infect
Immun 4(5): 593–5.
9. Borja, C. R. and M. S. Bergdoll, 1967.
Purification and partial characterization
of enterotoxin C produced by
Staphylococcus aureus strain 137.
Biochemistry 6(5): 1467–73.
10. Chintagumpala, M. M., J. A. Mollick, et
al., 1991. Staphylococcal toxins bind to
different sites on HLA–DR. J Immunol
147(11): 3876–81.
11. Chu, F. S., K. Thadhani, et al., 1966.
Purification and characterization of
staphylococcal enterotoxin A.
Biochemistry 5(10): 3281–9.
12. Lina, G., G.A. Bohach, et al., 2004.
Standard nomenclature for the
superantigens expressed by
Staphylococcus. J Infect Dis 189(12):
2334–6.
13. Schantz, E.J., W.G. Roessler, et al., 1965.
Purification of staphylococcal
PO 00000
Number of
responses per
respondent
enterotoxin B. Biochemistry 4(6): 1011–
6.
14. Wang, S., Y. Li, et al., 2008. A broadspectrum inhibitory peptide against
staphylococcal enterotoxin superantigen
SEA, SEB and SEC. Immunol Lett 121(2):
167–72.
15. Munson, S.H., M.T. Tremaine, et al.,
1998. Identification and characterization
of staphylococcal enterotoxin types G
and I from Staphylococcus aureus. Infect
Immun 66(7): 3337–48.
16. H.Su, Y.C. and A.C. Wong, 1995.
Identification and purification of a new
staphylococcal enterotoxin. Appl
Environ Microbiol 61(4): 1438–43.
17. Zhang, S., J.J. Iandolo, et al., 1998.The
enterotoxin D plasmid of Staphylococcus
aureus encodes a second enterotoxin
determinant (sej). FEMS Microbiol Lett
168(2): 227–33.
18. Orwin, P.M., J.R. Fitzgerald, et al., 2003.
Characterization of Staphylococcus
aureus enterotoxin L. Infect Immun
71(5): 2916–9.
19. Orwin, P.M., D.Y. Leung, et al., 2001.
Biochemical and biological properties of
Staphylococcal enterotoxin K. Infect
Immun 69(1): 360–6.
20. Orwin, P.M., D.Y. Leung, et al., 2002.
Characterization of a novel
staphylococcal enterotoxin-like
superantigen, a member of the group V
subfamily of pyrogenic toxins.
Biochemistry 41(47): 14033–40.
21. Jarraud, S., M.A. Peyrat, et al., 2001. Egc,
a highly prevalent operon of enterotoxin
gene, forms a putative nursery of
superantigens in Staphylococcus aureus.
J Immunol 166(1): 669–77.
22. Kuroda, M., T. Ohta, et al., 2001. Whole
genome sequencing of meticillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet
357(9264): 1225–40.
23. Omoe, K., K. Imanishi, et al., 2004.
Biological properties of staphylococcal
enterotoxin-like toxin type R. Infect
Immun 72(6): 3664–7.
24. Ono, H.K., K. Omoe, et al., 2008.
Identification and characterization of
two novel staphylococcal enterotoxins,
types S and T. Infect Immun 76(11):
4999–5005.
E:\FR\FM\03OCP2.SGM
03OCP2
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 / Proposed Rules
25. Letertre, C., S. Perelle, et al., 2003.
Identification of a new putative
enterotoxin SEU encoded by the egc
cluster of Staphylococcus aureus. J Appl
Microbiol 95(1): 38–43.
26. Thomas, D.Y., S. Jarraud, et al., 2006.
Staphylococcal enterotoxin-like toxins
U2 and V, two new staphylococcal
superantigens arising from
recombination within the enterotoxin
gene cluster. Infect Immun 74(8): 4724–
34.
27. Medina RA, Manicassamy B, Stertz S,
Seibert CW, Hai R, Belshe RB, Frey SE,
´
Basler CF, Palese P, Garcıa-Sastre A.
Pandemic 2009 H1N1 vaccine protects
against 1918 Spanish influenza virus.
Nat Commun. 2010 Jun 15;1:28. doi:
10.1038/ncomms1026.
´
28. Tumpey TM, Garcıa-Sastre A, Mikulasova
A, Taubenberger JK, Swayne DE, Palese
P, Basler CF. Existing antivirals are
effective against influenza viruses with
genes from the 1918 pandemic virus.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Oct
15;99(21):13849–54. Epub 2002 Oct 4.
29. Xiao Y, Isaacs SN. Therapeutic Vaccines
and Antibodies for Treatment of
Orthopoxvirus Infections. Viruses. 2010
Oct;2(10):2381–2403.
30. Rimoin AW, Mulembakani PM, Johnston
SC, Lloyd Smith JO, Kisalu NK, Kinkela
TL, Blumberg S, Thomassen HA, Pike
BL, Fair JN, Wolfe ND, Shongo RL,
Graham BS, Formenty P, Okitolonda E,
Hensley LE, Meyer H, Wright LL,
Muyembe JJ. Major increase in human
monkeypox incidence 30 years after
smallpox vaccination campaigns cease in
the Democratic Republic of Congo. Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep
14;107(37):16262–7. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
31. Reynolds MG, Carroll DS, Olson VA,
Hughes C, Galley J, Likos A, Montgomery
JM, Suu-Ire R, Kwasi MO, Jeffrey Root J,
Braden Z, Abel J, Clemmons C, Regnery
R, Karem K, Damon IK. A silent enzootic
of an orthopoxvirus in Ghana, West
Africa: evidence for multi-species
involvement in the absence of
widespread human disease. Am J Trop
Med Hyg. 2010 Apr;82(4):746–54.
32. Di Giulio DB, Eckburg PB. Human
monkeypox: an emerging zoonosis.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2004 Jan;4(1):15–25.
33. Hutson CL, Lee KN, Abel J, Carroll DS,
Montgomery JM, Olson VA, Li Y,
Davidson W, Hughes C, Dillon M,
Spurlock P, Kazmierczak JJ, Austin C,
Miser L, Sorhage FE, Howell J, Davis JP,
Reynolds MG, Braden Z, Karem KL,
Damon IK, Regnery RL. Monkeypox
zoonotic associations: insights from
laboratory evaluation of animals
associated with the multi-state US
outbreak. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007
Apr;76(4):757–68.
List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 73
Biologics, Incorporation by reference,
Packaging and containers, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Transportation.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Centers for Disease
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:10 Sep 30, 2011
Jkt 226001
Control and Prevention, United States
Department of Health and Human
Services, proposes to amend 42 CFR
part 73 as follows:
PART 73—SELECT AGENTS AND
TOXINS
1. The authority citation for part 73
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 262a; sections 201–
204, 221 and 231 of Title II of Public Law
107–188, 116 Stat 637 (42 U.S.C. 262a).
2. Section 73.1 is amended by adding,
in alphabetical order, definitions of
Adjudicated as a mental defective,
Alien, Committed to any mental
institution, Controlled substance, Crime
punishable by imprisonment for a term
exceeding 1 year, Indictment,
Information security, Lawfully admitted
for permanent residence, Mental
institution, Occupational exposure,
Recombinant and synthetic nucleic
acids, Restricted person, and Unlawful
user of any controlled substance to read
as set forth below.
§ 73.1
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Adjudicated as a mental defective. A
determination by a court, board,
commission, or other lawful authority
that a person, as a result of marked
subnormal intelligence, or mental
illness, incompetency, condition, or
disease is a danger to himself/herself or
to others or lacks the mental capacity to
contract or manage his/her own affairs.
The term includes a finding of insanity
by a court in a criminal case and those
persons found incompetent to stand
trial or found not guilty by reason of
lack of mental responsibility pursuant to
articles 50a and 72b of the Uniform
Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. 850a,
876b.
Alien. Any person not a citizen or
national of the United States.
*
*
*
*
*
Committed to any mental institution.
A formal commitment of a person to any
mental institution by a court, board,
commission, or other lawful authority.
The term includes a commitment to a
mental institution involuntarily. The
term includes commitment for mental
defectiveness or mental illness. It also
includes commitments for other
reasons, such as for drug use. The term
does not include a person in a mental
institution for observation or a
voluntary admission to a mental
institution.
Controlled substance. A drug or other
substance, or immediate precursor, as
defined in section 102 of the Controlled
Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. 802. The term
includes, but is not limited to,
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
61221
marijuana and scheduled depressants,
stimulants, and narcotic drugs. The term
does not include distilled spirits, wine,
malt beverages, or tobacco, as those
terms are defined or used in Subtitle E
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended.
Crime punishable by imprisonment
for a term exceeding 1 year. Any
Federal, State, or foreign offense for
which the maximum penalty, whether
or not imposed, is capital punishment
or imprisonment in excess of 1 year.
What constitutes a conviction of such a
crime shall be determined in accordance
with the law of the jurisdiction in which
the proceedings were held. Any
conviction that has been set aside or
nullified as a matter of law or for which
a person has been pardoned shall not be
considered a conviction for purposes of
this part.
*
*
*
*
*
Indictment. A formal written
accusation originating with a prosecutor
and issued by a grand jury against a
party charged with a crime. For the
purpose of these regulations the term
indictment includes any ‘‘information’’
that is a formal accusation of a crime,
differing only in that it is being
presented by a competent public officer
on his oath of office, instead of a grand
jury.
Information security. Protecting
information and information systems
from unauthorized access, use,
disclosure, disruption, modification, or
destruction in order to provide—
(1) Integrity, which means guarding
against improper information
modification or destruction, and
includes ensuring information
nonrepudiation and authenticity;
(2) Confidentiality, which means
preserving authorized restrictions on
access and disclosure, including means
for protecting personal privacy and
proprietary information; and
(3) Availability, which means
ensuring timely and reliable access to
and use of information.
*
*
*
*
*
Lawfully admitted for permanent
residence. The status of having been
lawfully accorded the privilege of
residing permanently in the United
States as an immigrant in accordance
with the immigration laws, such status
not having changed.
Mental institution. Includes mental
health facilities, mental hospitals,
sanitariums, psychiatric facilities, and
other facilities that provide diagnoses by
licensed professionals of mental
retardation or mental illness, including
a psychiatric ward in a general hospital.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\03OCP2.SGM
03OCP2
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
61222
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Occupational exposure. Any
reasonably anticipated skin, eye,
mucous membrane, or parenteral
contact with blood or other potentially
infectious materials or toxins that may
result from the performance of an
employee’s duties.
*
*
*
*
*
Recombinant and synthetic nucleic
acids.
(1) Recombinant nucleic acid
molecules that are constructed by
joining nucleic acid molecules and that
can replicate in a living cell;
(2) Synthetic nucleic acid molecules
that are chemically, or by other means,
synthesized or amplified nucleic acid
molecules that may wholly or partially
contain functional equivalents of
nucleotides; or
(3) Molecules that result from the
replication of those described in
paragraphs (1) or (2) of this definition.
*
*
*
*
*
Restricted person. An individual who:
(1) Is under indictment for a crime
punishable by imprisonment for a term
exceeding 1 year;
(2) Has been convicted in any court of
a crime punishable by imprisonment for
a term exceeding 1 year;
(3) Is a fugitive from justice;
(4) Is an unlawful user of any
controlled substance (as ‘‘controlled
substance’’ is defined in section 102 of
the Controlled Substances Act (21
U.S.C. 802));
(5) Is an alien illegally or unlawfully
in the United States;
(6) Has been adjudicated as a mental
defective or has been committed to any
mental institution;
(7) Is an alien (other than an alien
lawfully admitted for permanent
residence) who is a national of a country
as to which the Secretary of State,
pursuant to section 6(j) of the Export
Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C.
App. 2405(j)), section 620A of chapter 1
of part M of the Foreign Assistance Act
of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371), or section
40(d) of chapter 3 of the Arms Export
Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2780d), has made
a determination (that remains in effect)
that such country has repeatedly
provided support for acts of
international terrorism; or
(8) Has been discharged from the
Armed Services of the United States
under dishonorable conditions.
*
*
*
*
*
Unlawful user of any controlled
substance. For purposes of this part, a
person who uses a controlled substance
and has lost the power of self-control
with reference to the use of that
controlled substance; and any person
who is a current user of a controlled
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:10 Sep 30, 2011
Jkt 226001
substance in a manner other than as
prescribed by a licensed physician.
Such use is not limited to the use of
drugs on a particular day, or within a
matter of days or weeks before, but
rather that the unlawful use has
occurred recently enough to indicate
that the individual is actively engaged
in such conduct. A person may be an
unlawful current user of a controlled
substance even though the substance is
not being used at the precise time the
person seeks to have access to a select
agent or toxin. An inference of current
use may be drawn from evidence of a
recent use or possession of a controlled
substance or a pattern of use or
possession that reasonably covers the
present time, e.g., a conviction for use
or possession of a controlled substance
within the past year; multiple arrests for
such offenses within the past 5 years if
the most recent arrest occurred within
the past year, or persons found through
a drug test to use a controlled substance
unlawfully, provided that the test was
administered within the past year. For
a current or former member of the
Armed Forces, an inference of current
use may be drawn from recent
disciplinary or other administrative
action based on confirmed drug use,
e.g., court-martial conviction,
nonjudicial punishment, or an
administrative discharge based on drug
use or drug rehabilitation failure.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Section 73.3 is amended as follows:
a. By adding a sentence to the end of
paragraph (a) to read as set forth below.
b. By revising paragraph (b) to read as
set forth below.
c. In paragraph (c), in the introductory
text, by adding the phrase ‘‘and/or
Synthetic’’ after the word
‘‘Recombinant’’ each time it appears.
d. In paragraph (c)(2) introductory
text, by adding the phrase ‘‘and/or
synthetic’’ after the word
‘‘Recombinant’’.
e. By revising paragraph (d)(3) to read
as set forth below.
f. By adding a new paragraph (d)(4) to
read as set forth below.
g. By revising paragraph (e) to read as
set forth below.
h. In paragraph (f)(3)(i), by removing
the words ‘‘Lassa fever virus, South
American Haemorrhagic Fever virus
(Junin, Machupo, Sabia, Flexal,
Guanarito)’’ and by adding the words
‘‘Botulinum neurotoxin producing
species of Clostridium.’’
§ 73.3
HHS select agents and toxins.
(a) * * * The select agents and toxins
marked with an asterisk (*) are
designated as Tier 1 select agents and
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
toxins and are subject to additional
requirements as listed in this part.
(b) HHS select agents and toxins: 1
Abrin
Botulinum neurotoxins*
Botulinum neurotoxin producing
species of Clostridium*
Chapare
Clostridium perfringens epsilon toxin
Conotoxins
Coxiella burnetii
Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever
virus
Diacetoxyscirpenol
Eastern Equine Encephalitis virus
(North American genotypes)
Ebola virus*
Francisella tularensis*
Lassa fever virus
Lujo
Marburg virus*
Monkeypox virus
Reconstructed replication competent
forms of the 1918 pandemic influenza
virus containing any portion of the
coding regions of all eight gene
segments (Reconstructed 1918 Influenza
virus)
Ricin
Rickettsia prowazekii
Rickettsia rickettsii
Saxitoxin
Shiga-like ribosome inactivating
proteins
Shigatoxin
South American Haemorrhagic Fever
viruses
Guanarito
Junin
Machupo
Sabia
Staphylococcal enterotoxins (SE) A–E
(SEA, SEB, SEC, SED, SEE)
T–2 toxin
Tetrodotoxin
Tick-borne encephalitis virus
Far Eastern subtype
Siberian subtype
Kyasanur Forest disease virus
Omsk hemorrhagic fever virus
Variola major virus (Smallpox virus)*
Variola minor virus (Alastrim)*
Yersinia pestis*
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(3) Except as required in § 73.16(l),
HHS toxins under the control of a
principal investigator, treating
physician or veterinarian, or
commercial manufacturer or distributor,
if:
(i) The aggregate amount does not, at
any time, exceed the following amounts:
100 mg of Abrin; 0.5 mg of Botulinum
neurotoxins; 100 mg of Clostridium
1 Including all toxin derivatives, both naturally
occurring and synthetic, that retain function.
E:\FR\FM\03OCP2.SGM
03OCP2
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 / Proposed Rules
perfringens epsilon toxin; 100 mg of
Conotoxins; 1,000 mg of
Diacetoxyscirpenol; 100 mg of Ricin;
100 mg of Saxitoxin; 100 mg of Shigalike ribosome inactivating proteins; 100
mg of Shigatoxin; 5 mg of
Staphylococcal enterotoxins; 1,000 mg
of T–2 toxin; or 100 mg of Tetrodotoxin.
(ii) Amounts of toxins equal to or less
than the amounts identified in
paragraph (d)(3)(i) of this section are
transferred only after the transferor uses
due diligence and documents that the
recipient has a legitimate need (i.e.
reasonably justified by a prophylactic,
protective, bona fide research, or other
peaceful purpose) to handle or use such
toxins. Notwithstanding the provisions
of paragraph (d) of this section, the HHS
Secretary retains the authority to,
without prior notification, inspect and
copy or request the submission of the
due diligence documentation to the
CDC.
(iii) The transfer of amounts of toxins
equal to or less than the amounts
identified in paragraph (d)(3)(i) of this
section reports to CDC if they detect a
known or suspected violation of Federal
law or become aware of suspicious
activity related to a toxin listed in
section of this part.
(4) Notwithstanding paragraph
(d)(3)(i) of this section, an animal
inoculated with or exposed to an HHS
select toxin.
(e) An attenuated strain of a select
agent or an inactive form of a select
toxin may be excluded from the
requirements of this part based upon a
determination by the HHS Secretary that
the attenuated strain or inactivated
toxin does not pose a severe threat to
public health and safety.
(1) To apply for exclusion, an
individual or entity must submit a
written request and supporting
scientific information. A written
decision granting or denying the request
will be issued. An exclusion will be
effective upon notification to the
applicant. Exclusions will be listed on
the National Select Agent Registry Web
site at https://www.selectagents.gov/.
(2) If an excluded attenuated strain or
inactivated toxin is subjected to any
manipulation that restores or enhances
its virulence or toxic activity, the
resulting select agent or toxin will be
subject to the requirements of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
4. Section 73.4 is amended as follows:
a. By adding a sentence to the end of
paragraph (a) to read as set forth below.
b. By revising paragraph (b) to read as
set forth below.
c. In paragraph (c), in the introductory
text, by adding the phrase ‘‘and/or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:10 Sep 30, 2011
Jkt 226001
synthetic’’ after the word
‘‘Recombinant’’ each time it appears.
d. In paragraph (c)(2), by adding the
phrase ‘‘and/or synthetic’’ after the
word ‘‘Recombinant’’.
e. By revising paragraph (e) to read as
set forth below.
f. In paragraph (f)(3)(i), by removing
the words ‘‘Brucella melitensis, Hendra
virus, Nipah virus, Rift Valley fever
virus, and Venezuelan equine
encephalitis virus’’ and adding the
words ‘‘Burkholderia mallei and
Burkholderia pseudomallei’’ in their
place.
§ 73.4
Overlap select agents and toxins.
(a) * * * The select agents and toxins
marked with an asterisk (*) are
designated as Tier 1 select agents and
toxins and are subject to additional
requirements as listed in this part.
(b) Overlap select agents and toxins:
Bacillus anthracis;*
Brucella abortus;
Brucella melitensis;
Brucella suis;
Burkholderia mallei;*
Burkholderia pseudomallei;*
Hendra virus;
Nipah virus;
Rift Valley fever virus;
Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus:
Epizootic Subtypes IAB, IC.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) An attenuated strain of a select
agent or an inactive form of a select
toxin may be excluded from the
requirements of this part based upon a
determination by the HHS Secretary or
Administrator that the attenuated strain
or inactivated toxin does not pose a
severe threat to public health and safety,
to animal health or to animal products.
(1) To apply for exclusion, an
individual or entity must submit a
written request and supporting
scientific information. A written
decision granting or denying the request
will be issued. An exclusion will be
effective upon notification to the
applicant. Exclusions will be listed on
the National Select Agent Registry Web
site at https://www.selectagents.gov/.
(2) If an excluded attenuated strain or
inactivated toxin is subjected to any
manipulation that restores or enhances
its virulence or toxic activity, the
resulting select agent or toxin will be
subject to the requirements of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 73.5
[Amended]
5. Section 73.5(a)(3)(i) is amended by
removing the words ‘‘Lassa fever virus,
South American Haemorrhagic Fever
virus (Junin, Machupo, Sabia, Flexal,
Guanarito)’’ and by adding the words
‘‘Botulinum neurotoxin producing
species of Clostridium’’ in their place.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
§ 73.6
61223
[Amended]
6. Section 73.6(a)(3)(i) is amended by
removing the words ‘‘Brucella
melitensis, Hendra virus, Nipah virus,
Rift Valley fever virus, and Venezuelan
equine encephalitis virus’’ and adding
the words ‘‘Burkholderia mallei and
Burkholderia pseudomallei’’ in their
place.
§ 73.8
[Amended]
7. Section 73.8 (a)(1) is amended by
removing the words ‘‘within any of the
categories described in 18 U.S.C. 175b’’
and adding the words ‘‘a restricted
person’’ in their place.
*
*
*
*
*
8. Section 73.9 is amended as follows:
a. By redesignating paragraphs (a)(3)
through (a)(5) as paragraphs (a)(4)
through (a)(6) respectively.
b. By adding a new paragraph (a)(3) to
read as set forth below.
c. In newly redesignated paragraph
(a)(5), by removing the word ‘‘and’’.
d. By further redesignating newly
redesignated paragraph (a)(6) as
paragraph (a)(7).
e. By adding a new paragraph (a)(6) to
read as set forth below.
f. By revising the first sentence of
paragraph (b) to read as set forth below.
g. In paragraph (c)(1), by removing the
words ‘‘Bacillus anthracis, Botulinum
neurotoxins, Brucella melitensis,
Francisella tularensis, Ebola viruses,
Hendra virus, Marburg virus, Lassa fever
virus, Nipah virus, Rift Valley fever
virus, South American Haemorrhagic
Fever viruses (Junin, Machupo, Sabia,
Flexal, Guanarito), Variola major virus
(Smallpox virus), Variola minor
(Alastrim), Venezuelan equine
encephalitis virus and Yersina pestis’’
and adding the words ‘‘Bacillus
anthracis, Botulinum neurotoxins,
Botulinum neurotoxin producing
species of Clostridium, Burkholderia
mallei, Burkholderia pseudomallei,
Francisella tularensis, Ebola viruses,
Marburg virus, Variola major virus
(Smallpox virus), Variola minor
(Alastrim), and Yersinia pestis’’ in their
place.
(a) * * *
(3) Have the appropriate training and
expertise to competently implement and
manage the requirements of this part;
*
*
*
*
*
(6) Have their principal duty station at
the physical location of the entity; and
*
*
*
*
*
(b) An entity may designate one or
more individuals to serve as an alternate
Responsible Official, who acts for the
Responsible Official in his/her absence.
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\03OCP2.SGM
03OCP2
61224
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 / Proposed Rules
9. Section 73.10 is amended as
follows:
a. By redesignating paragraphs (e)
through (j) as paragraphs (f) through (k)
respectively.
b. By adding a new paragraph (e) to
read as set forth below.
c. In newly redesignated paragraph
(g), by removing the words ‘‘within any
of the categories described in 18 U.S.C.
175b’’ and adding the words ‘‘a
restricted person’’ in their place.
d. In newly redesignated paragraph
(j), by removing the word ‘‘five’’ and
adding the word ‘‘three’’ in its place.
§ 73.10 Restricting access to select agents
and toxins; security risk assessments.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) A person who has a valid approval
from the HHS Secretary or
Administrator for access to a select
agent or toxin may request the HHS
Secretary or Administrator to provide
the person’s approval status to another
registered individual or entity for a
specified period of time.
*
*
*
*
*
10. Section 73.11 is amended as
follows:
a. By revising paragraph (b) to read as
set forth below.
b. By revising paragraph (c)(2) to read
as set forth below.
c. By adding new paragraphs (c)(8),
(c)(9), and (c)(10) to read as set forth
below.
d. By redesignating paragraphs (e) and
(f) as paragraphs (f) and (g), respectively
and by revising redesignated paragraph
(f) to read as set forth below.
e. By adding a new paragraph (e) to
read as set forth below.
§ 73.11
Security.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The security plan must be
designed according to a site-specific risk
assessment and must provide graded
protection in accordance with the risk of
the select agent or toxin, given its
intended use. A current security plan
must be submitted for initial
registration, renewal of registration, or
when requested.
(c) * * *
(2) Contain provisions for the control
of access to select agents and toxins,
including the safeguarding of animals or
plants intentionally or accidentally
exposed to or infected with a select
agent, against unauthorized access,
theft, loss or release.
*
*
*
*
*
(8) Describe procedures for how the
Responsible Official will be informed of
suspicious activity that may be criminal
in nature and related to the entity, its
personnel, or its select agents or toxins;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:10 Sep 30, 2011
Jkt 226001
and how the Responsible Official will
notify the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) of such activity,
(9) Contain provisions for information
security that:
(i) Ensure that all external
connections to systems which control
security of the facility are isolated or
have controls that permit and monitor
for only authorized and authenticated
user access;
(ii) Ensure that authorized and
authenticated users are only granted
access to select agent and toxin related
information, files, equipment (e.g.,
servers or mass storage devices) and
applications as necessary to fulfill their
roles and responsibilities, and that
access is modified when the user’s roles
and responsibilities change or when
their access to select agent and toxin is
suspended or revoked;
(iii) Ensure that controls are in place
that are designed to prevent malicious
code (such as, but not limited to,
computer virus, worms, spyware) from
compromising the confidentiality,
integrity, or availability of information
systems;
(iv) Establish a robust configuration
management practice for information
systems to include regular patching and
updates made to operating systems and
individual applications; and
(v) Establish procedures that provide
backup security measures in the event
that access control systems and/or
surveillance devices are rendered
inoperable.
(10) Contain provisions and policies
for shipping, receiving, and storage of
select agents and toxins, including
documented procedures for receiving,
monitoring, and shipping of all select
agents and toxins. These provisions
must provide that an entity will
properly secure containers on site and
have a written contingency plan for
unexpected shipments.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) In addition to the requirements
contained in paragraphs (c) and (d) of
this section, the security plan for an
individual or entity possessing a Tier 1
select agent or toxin must also:
(1) Describe procedures for
conducting a pre-access suitability
assessment of persons who will have
access to a Tier 1 select agent or toxin;
(2) Describe procedures for how an
entity’s Responsible Official will
coordinate their efforts with the entity’s
safety and security professionals to
ensure security of Tier 1 select agents
and toxins and share, as appropriate,
relevant information; and
(3) Describe procedures for the
ongoing assessment of the suitability of
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
personnel with access to a Tier 1 select
agent or toxin. The procedures must
include:
(i) Self- and peer-reporting of
incidents or conditions that could affect
an individual’s ability to safely have
access to or work with select agents and
toxins, or to safeguard select agents and
toxins from theft, loss, or release;
(ii) The training of all entity
employees on entity policies and
procedures for reporting, evaluation,
and corrective actions concerning the
assessment of personnel suitability to
access Tier 1 agents and toxins; and
(iii) The ongoing suitability
monitoring of individuals with access to
Tier 1 select agents and toxins.
(4) Entities with Tier 1 select agents
and toxins must prescribe and/or
implement the following security
enhancements:
(i) Procedures that will limit access to
registered space only to those approved
by the HHS Secretary or the
Administrator and meet the criteria of
the entity’s program that will ensure
individuals with access approval to
select agents and toxins are trustworthy
and behaving in a manner that upholds
public health and safety, security, and
the integrity of the scientific enterprise.
(ii) Procedures that limit access to
laboratory and storage facilities outside
of normal business hours to only those
specifically approved by the
Responsible Official or designee;
(iii) Procedures for allowing visitors,
their property, and vehicles at the entry
and exit points to the registered space,
or at other designated points of entry to
the building, facility, or compound
based on the entity’s site-specific risk
assessment;
(iv) A minimum of three barriers
where each subsequent barrier is
different and adds to the delay in
reaching secured areas where select
agents and toxins are used or stored.
Barriers must be monitored in such a
way as to detect and assess intentional
and unintentional circumventing of
established access control measures
under all conditions (day/night, severe
weather, etc.);
(v) All registered space or areas that
reasonably afford access to the
registered space must be protected by an
intrusion detection system (IDS) unless
physically occupied;
(vi) Personnel monitoring the IDS
must be capable of evaluating and
interpreting the alarm and alerting the
designated security response force or
law enforcement;
(vii) Provide backup power and
energy sources to power information
security networks and integrated access
E:\FR\FM\03OCP2.SGM
03OCP2
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 / Proposed Rules
controls and related systems during
emergencies;
(viii) Response time for security forces
or local police must not exceed 15
minutes from the time of an intrusion
alarm or report of a security incident;
(ix) Entities must conduct complete
inventory audits of all Tier 1 select
agents and toxins in long-term storage
when any of the following occur:
(A) Upon the physical relocation of a
collection or inventory of select agents
or toxins for those Tier 1 select agents
or toxins in the collection or inventory;
(B) Upon the departure or arrival of a
principal investigator for those Tier 1
select agents and toxins under the
control of that principal investigator; or
(C) In the event of a theft or loss of
a Tier 1 select agent or toxin.
(5) Entities that possess Variola major
virus and Variola minor virus must have
the following additional security
requirements:
(i) Require personnel with access to
Variola major or Variola minor virus to
have a Top Secret security clearance,
(ii) Require Variola major or Variola
minor virus storage locations be under
the surveillance of closed circuit
television that is monitored,
(iii) After hours access procedures for
Variola major or Variola minor virus
must require notification of the entity’s
security staff prior to entry into the
Variola laboratory and upon exit,
(iv) Require that observation zones be
maintained in outdoor areas adjacent to
the physical barrier at the perimeter of
the entity and be large enough to permit
observation of the activities of people at
that barrier in the event of its
penetration,
(v) Provide for a minimum of four
barriers for the protection of the Variola
major or Variola minor virus, one of
which must be a perimeter fence,
(vi) Require a numbered picture badge
identification subsystem to be used for
all individuals who are authorized to
access Variola major or Variola minor
without escort,
(vii) Require the use, at all times, of
properly trained, and equipped security
force personnel able to interdict threats
identified in the site specific risk
assessment,
(viii) Identify security force personnel
designated to strengthen onsite response
capabilities, and that will be onsite and
available at all times to carry out their
assigned response duties,
(ix) Provide for security patrols to
periodically check external areas of the
registered areas to include physical
barriers and building entrances,
(x) Require that all on-duty security
force personnel shall be capable of
maintaining continuous communication
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:10 Sep 30, 2011
Jkt 226001
with support and response assets by
way of security operations center,
(xi) Require that Variola major and
Variola minor material in long term
storage be stored in tamper-indicating
containers,
(xii) Require that all spaces containing
working or permanent Variola major or
Variola minor stocks be locked and
protected by an intrusion alarm system
that will alarm upon the unauthorized
entry of a person anywhere into the
area,
(xiii) Require that alarms required
pursuant to this section annunciate in a
continuously manned security
operations center located within the
facility,
(xiv) Require that the security
operations center shall be located
within a building so that the interior is
not visible from the perimeter of the
protected area.
(f) In developing a security plan, an
individual or entity should consider the
documents entitled, ‘‘Select Agents and
Toxins Security Information Document’’
and ‘‘Select Agents and Toxins Security
Plan Template.’’ These documents are
available on the Internet at https://
www.selectagents.gov/.
*
*
*
*
*
11. Section 73.12 is amended as
follows:
a. By revising paragraph (a) to read as
set forth below.
b. By revising paragraph (c)(1) to read
as set forth below.
c. In paragraph (c)(3), by removing the
URL ‘‘https://www.cdc.gov/’’ and adding
in its place ‘‘https://
www.selectagents.gov’’.
d. By redesignating paragraph (d) as
paragraph (e).
e. By adding a new paragraph (d) to
read as set forth below.
§ 73.12
Biosafety.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) An individual or entity required to
register under this part must develop
and implement a written biosafety plan
that is commensurate with the risk of
the select agent or toxin, given its
intended use. The biosafety plan must
contain sufficient information and
documentation to describe the biosafety
and containment procedures for the
select agent or toxin, including any
animals or plants intentionally or
accidentally exposed to or infected with
a select agent.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) The CDC/NIH publication,
‘‘Biosafety in Microbiological and
Biomedical Laboratories.’’ This
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
61225
document is available on the Internet at
https://www.selectagents.gov.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) The biosafety plan must include
an occupational health program for
individuals with access to Tier 1 select
agents and toxins, and those individuals
must be enrolled in the occupational
health program. The occupational
health program may also be made
available to individuals without access
to Tier 1 select agents and toxins.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 73.13
[Amended]
12. Section 73.13 is amended as
follows:
a. In paragraph (a), in the introductory
text, by adding the phrase ‘‘, or possess
products (i.e. select agents that are not
known to acquire the resistance
naturally, if such acquisition could
compromise the use of the drug to
control disease agents in humans,
veterinary medicine, or agriculture, or
recombinant and or synthetic DNA
containing genes for the biosynthesis of
select toxins lethal for vertebrates at an
LD[50] < 100 ng/kg body weight)
resulting from,’’ after the word
‘‘conduct’’ both times it appears.
b. In paragraph (b)(1), by removing the
words ‘‘Experiments utilizing
recombinant DNA that involve the
deliberate transfer of’’ and replacing
them with the words ‘‘Experiments that
involve the deliberate transfer of, or
selection for,’’.
c. In paragraph (b)(2), by adding the
words ‘‘synthetic or’’ before the word
‘‘recombinant.’’
13. Section 73.14 is amended as
follows:
a. By revising paragraph (a) to read as
set forth below.
b. By revising paragraph (b) to read as
set forth below.
c. By redesignating paragraph (c) and
(d) as paragraphs (d) and (f)
respectively.
d. By adding a new paragraph (c) to
read as set forth below.
e. By adding a new paragraph (e) to
read as set forth below.
§ 73.14
Incident response.
(a) An individual or entity required to
register under this part must develop
and implement a written incident
response plan based upon a site specific
risk assessment.2 The incident response
plan must be coordinated with any
entity-wide plans, kept in the
2 Nothing in this section is meant to supersede or
preempt incident response requirements imposed
by other statutes or regulations.
E:\FR\FM\03OCP2.SGM
03OCP2
61226
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 / Proposed Rules
workplace, and available to employees
for review.
(b) The incident response plan must
fully describe the entity’s response
procedures for the theft, loss, or release
of a select agent or toxin; inventory
discrepancies; security breaches
(including information systems); severe
weather and other natural disasters;
workplace violence; bomb threats and
suspicious packages; and emergencies
such as fire, gas leak, explosion, power
outage, etc.
(c) The response procedures must
account for hazards associated with the
select agent or toxin and appropriate
actions to contain such select agent or
toxin, including any animals or plants
intentionally or accidentally exposed to
or infected with a select agent.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Entities with Tier 1 select agents
and toxins must have the following
additional incident response policies or
procedures:
(1) The incident response plan must
fully describe the entity’s response
procedures for failure of intrusion
detection or alarm system; and
(2) The incident response plan must
describe notification procedures for the
FBI in the event of a theft or suspicious
activity that may be criminal in nature
involving a Tier 1 select agent or toxin.
*
*
*
*
*
14. Section 73.15 is revised to read as
follows:
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 73.15
Training.
(a) An individual or entity required to
register under this part must provide
information and training on biosafety,
security (including security awareness)
and incident response:
(1) To each individual with access
approval from the HHS Secretary or
Administrator before that individual has
such access to select agents and toxins.
The training must address the particular
needs of the individual, the work they
will do, and the risks posed by the
select agents or toxins.
(2) To each individual not approved
for access to select agents and toxins by
the HHS Secretary or Administrator
before that individual enters areas
where select agents or toxins are
handled or stored (e.g., laboratories,
growth chambers, animal rooms,
greenhouses, storage areas, shipping/
receiving areas, production facilities,
etc.). Training for escorted personnel
must be based on the risk associated
with accessing areas where select agents
and toxins are used and/or stored.
(b) Entities with Tier 1 select agents
and toxins must conduct annual insider
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:10 Sep 30, 2011
Jkt 226001
threat awareness briefings on how to
identify and report suspicious
behaviors.
(c) Refresher training must be
provided annually or at such time as the
registered individual or entity
significantly amends its security,
incident response, or biosafety plans.
(d) The Responsible Official must
ensure a record of the training provided
to each individual with access to select
agents and each escorted individual
(e.g., laboratory workers, visitors, etc.) is
maintained. The record must include
the name of the individual, the date of
the training, a description of the training
provided, and the means used to verify
that the employee understood the
training.
15. Section 73.16 is amended as
follows:
a. By redesignating paragraph (f), (g),
(h), and (i) as paragraphs (i), (j), (k), and
(g) respectively.
b. In redesignated paragraph (g), by
removing the words ‘‘packaging and’’.
c. By adding a new paragraph (f) to
read as set forth below.
d. By adding a new paragraph (h) to
read as set forth below.
e. By adding a new paragraph (l) to
read as set forth below.
§ 73.16
Transfers.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) After authorization is provided by
APHIS or CDC, the select agent(s) and
toxin(s) are packaged for shipment in
compliance with all applicable laws
concerning packaging by an individual
approved by the HHS Secretary or
Administrator to have access to select
agents and toxins, following a security
risk assessment by the Attorney General.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) Transportation in commerce starts
when the select agent(s) or toxin(s) are
packaged for shipment and ready for
receipt by a courier transporting select
agent(s) or toxin(s) and ends when the
package is received by the intended
recipient who is an individual approved
by the HHS Secretary or Administrator
to have access to select agents and
toxins, following a security risk
assessment by the Attorney General.
*
*
*
*
*
(l) A registered individual or entity
transferring an amount of a HHS toxin
otherwise excluded under the
provisions of § 73.3(d) of this part must:
(1) Transfer the HHS toxin only after
using due diligence and documenting
that the recipient has a legitimate need
(reasonably justified by a prophylactic,
protective, bona fide research, or other
peaceful purpose) to handle or use such
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
toxins. The HHS Secretary retains the
authority to, without prior notification,
inspect and copy or request the
submission of the due diligence
documentation to the CDC.
(2) Report to CDC any known or
suspected violation of Federal law or
suspicious activity related to the toxin.
16. Section 73.17 is amended as
follows:
a. By revising paragraph (a)(1)
introductory text to read as set forth
below.
b. By redesignating paragraphs (a)(2)
through (a)(6) as paragraphs (a)(3)
through (a)(7) respectively.
c. By adding a new paragraph (a)(2) to
read as set forth below.
§ 73.17
Records.
(a) * * *
(1) An accurate, current inventory for
each select agent (including viral
genetic elements, recombinant and/or
synthetic nucleic acids, and
recombinant and/or synthetic
organisms) held in long-term storage
(placement in a system designed to
ensure viability for future use, such as
in a freezer or lyophilized materials),
including:
*
*
*
*
*
(2) An accurate, current inventory of
any animals or plants intentionally or
accidentally exposed to or infected with
a select agent (including number and
species, location, and appropriate
disposition);
*
*
*
*
*
17. Section 73.20 is revised to read as
set forth below.
§ 73.20
Administrative review.
(a) An individual or entity may appeal
a denial, revocation, or suspension of
registration under this part. The appeal
must be in writing, state the factual
basis for the appeal, and be submitted
to the HHS Secretary within 30 calendar
days of the decision.
(b) An individual may appeal a
denial, limitation, or revocation of
access approval under this part. The
appeal must be in writing, state the
factual basis for the appeal, and be
submitted to the HHS Secretary within
180 calendar days of the decision.
(c) The HHS Secretary’s decision
constitutes final agency action.
Dated: September 21, 2011.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–25427 Filed 9–30–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
E:\FR\FM\03OCP2.SGM
03OCP2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 191 (Monday, October 3, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 61206-61226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25427]
[[Page 61205]]
Vol. 76
Monday,
No. 191
October 3, 2011
Part IV
Department of Health and Human Services
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
42 CFR Part 73
Possession, Use, and Transfer of Select Agents and Toxins; Biennial
Review; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 76 , No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 61206]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
[Docket No. CDC-2011-0012]
42 CFR Part 73
RIN 0920-AA34
Possession, Use, and Transfer of Select Agents and Toxins;
Biennial Review
AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism
Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 (the Bioterrorism Response Act),
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) located within the
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has reviewed the list of
biological agents and toxins that have the potential to pose a severe
threat to public health and safety and is proposing to amend and
republish the list as required by the Bioterrorism Response Act.
Further, on July 2, 2010, the President signed Executive Order 13546,
``Optimizing the Security of Biological Select Agents and Toxins in the
United States'' that directed the Secretaries of HHS and Agriculture
(USDA) to designate a subset of the select agents and toxins list (Tier
1) that presents the greatest risk of deliberate misuse with the most
significant potential for mass casualties or devastating effects to the
economy, critical infrastructure; or public confidence; explore options
for graded protection for these Tier 1 agents and toxins to permit
tailored risk management practices based upon relevant contextual
factors; and consider reducing the overall number of agents and toxins
on the select agents and toxins list. E.O. 13546 also established the
Federal Experts Security Advisory Panel (FESAP) to advise the HHS and
USDA Secretaries on the designation of Tier 1 agents and toxins,
reduction in the number of agents on the Select Agent List,
establishment of suitability standards for those having access to Tier
1 select agents and toxins, and establishment of physical security and
information security standards for Tier 1 select agents and toxins. The
tiering of the select agents and toxins list will allow the application
of more optimized security measures for those select agents or toxins
which pose a higher risk to public health and safety should they be
stolen or otherwise misused.
In addition to addressing the FESAP recommendations in this Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), we are also proposing to add two agents,
Lujo and Chapare viruses to the list; adding definitions; and
clarifying language concerning security, training, biosafety, and
incident response. These changes will increase the usability of the
select agents and toxins regulations as well as providing for enhanced
program oversight.
DATES: Comments should be received on or before December 2, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Regulatory
Information Number (RIN), 0920-AA34 in the heading of this document by
any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Select
Agent Program, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop A-46, Atlanta, Georgia
30333, Attn: RIN 0920-AA34.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and RIN for this rulemaking. All relevant comments received will be
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Docket Access: For access to the docket to read background
documents or comments received or to download an electronic version of
the NPRM, go to https://www.regulations.gov. Comments will be available
for public inspection Monday through Friday, except for legal holidays,
from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m. at 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Atlanta, GA 30333.
Please call ahead to 1-866-694-4867 and ask for a representative in the
Division of Select Agents and Toxins to schedule your visit. Our
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the
Internet as they are received and without change.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robbin Weyant, Director, Division of
Select Agents and Toxins, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop A-46, Atlanta, Georgia 30333.
Telephone: (404) 718-2000.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Preamble to this notice of proposed
rulemaking is organized as follows:
I. Background
II. Proposed Changes to 42 CFR Part 73, Including Responses to
Comments to the ANPRM
A. Modifications to the List of HHS Select Agents and Toxins
B. Modifications to the List of Overlap Select Agents and Toxins
C. Tiering
D. Responses to Other Comments and Other Proposed Changes
i. Exclusions
ii. Security
iii. Select Agent Inventory
iv. Definitions
v. Recombinant/Synthetic Nucleic Acids
vi. Toxins
vii. Responsible Official
viii. Access to Select Agents and Toxins
ix. Security Plan
x. Biosafety Plans
xi. Restricted Experiments
xii. Incident Response
xiii. Training
xiv. Transfers
xv. Records
xvi. Administrative Review
xvii. Guidance Documents
III. Required Regulatory Analyses
A. Executive Order 12866 and 13563
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
D. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Plain Writing Act of 2010
IV. References
I. Background
The Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and
Response Act of 2002, Subtitle A (Department of Health and Human
Services) of Title II (Enhancing Controls on Dangerous Biological
Agents and Toxins) of Public Law 107-188 (June 12, 2002) (42 U.S.C.
262a) (the Bioterrorism Response Act), requires the HHS Secretary to
establish by regulation a list of each biological agent and each toxin
that has the potential to pose a severe threat to public health and
safety. In determining whether to include an agent or toxin on the
list, the HHS Secretary considers the effect on human health of
exposure to an agent or toxin; the degree of contagiousness of the
agent and the methods by which the agent or toxin is transferred to
humans; the availability and effectiveness of pharmacotherapies and
immunizations to treat and prevent illnesses resulting from an agent or
toxin; the potential for an agent or toxin to be used as a biological
weapon; and the needs of children and other vulnerable populations. The
current list of HHS select agents and toxins can be found at 42 CFR
73.3 (HHS select agents and toxins) and 42 CFR 73.4 (Overlap select
agents and toxins). The list of HHS and Overlap select agents and
toxins is available at: https://www.selectagents.gov/Select%20Agents%20and%20Toxins%20List.html. The Bioterrorism Response
Act requires that the HHS Secretary review and republish the list of
select
[[Page 61207]]
agents and toxins on at least a biennial basis. See 42 U.S.C.
262a(a)(2).
The HHS Secretary last republished the HHS select agents and toxins
list in the Federal Register on October 16, 2008 (73 FR 61363). The HHS
select agents and toxins list is divided into two sections. The select
agents and toxins listed in Sec. 73.3 (HHS select agents and toxins)
are those regulated only by HHS under the authority of the Bioterrorism
Response Act. The select agents and toxins listed in Sec. 73.4
(Overlap select agents and toxins) are those regulated by HHS under the
authority of the Bioterrorism Response Act and regulated by the USDA
under the authority of the Agricultural Bioterrorism Protection Act of
2002 (7 U.S.C. 8401).
To fulfill this statutory mandate, the Center for Disease Control
and Prevention's (CDC) Division of Select Agents and Toxins (DSAT)
initiated its biennial review process, which included consultation with
CDC's Intragovernmental Select Agents and Toxins Technical Advisory
Committee (ISATTAC) and other subject matter experts. The ISATTAC is
comprised of Federal government employees from the CDC, the National
Institutes of Health (NIH), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the
USDA/Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), USDA/
Agricultural Research Service (ARS), USDA/CVB (Center for Veterinary
Biologics), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Department
of Defense (DOD), and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development
Authority (BARDA) within the Office of the Assistant Secretary for
Preparedness and Response in HHS.
CDC also published an ANPRM in the Federal Register (75 FR 42363)
(July 21, 2010 ANPRM) inviting comments concerning potential changes to
part 73 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations (the select
agent regulations). We solicited comments regarding (1) the
appropriateness of the current HHS list of select agents and toxins;
(2) whether there are other biological agents or toxins that should be
added to the HHS list; (3) whether biological agents or toxins
currently on the HHS list should be deleted from the list; (4) whether
the HHS select agents and toxins list should be tiered based on the
relative bioterrorism risk of each biological agent or toxin; and (5)
whether the security requirements for select agents or toxins in the
highest tier should be further stratified based on type of use or other
factors. We requested recommendations regarding the criteria to use to
designate high risk select agents and toxins and those recommendations
were included in the interagency working group discussions on the
matter. Relevant issues raised by the comments are discussed below in
``II. Proposed Changes to 42 CFR part 73.''
On July 2, 2010, President Obama signed Executive Order (E.O.)
13546: ``Optimizing the Security of Biological Select Agents and Toxins
in the United States'' that directed the Secretaries of HHS and USDA to
(1) designate a subset of the select agents and toxins list (Tier 1)
that presents the greatest risk of deliberate misuse with the most
significant potential for mass casualties or devastating effects to the
economy, critical infrastructure; or public confidence; (2) explore
options for graded protection of Tier 1 agents and toxins to permit
tailored risk management practices based upon relevant contextual
factors; and (3) consider reducing the overall number of agents and
toxins on the select agents and toxins list. E.O. 13546 also
established the FESAP to advise the HHS and USDA Secretaries on the
designation of Tier 1 agents and toxins, reduction in the number of
agents on the Select Agent List, establishment of personnel reliability
standards for those having access to Tier 1 select agents and toxins,
and establishment of physical security and information security
standards for Tier 1 select agents and toxins. E.O. 13546 is available
at: https://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-16864.pdf. The FESAP
provided its recommendations to the HHS and USDA Secretaries on
November 2, 2010. The FESAP recommendations addressed the reduction of
the list of select agents and toxins, the identification of a subset of
the list that includes those that presents the greatest risk of
deliberate misuse with the most significant potential for mass
casualties or devastating effects to the economy, critical
infrastructure; or public confidence; and the optimization of security
programs at registered entities. In drafting its recommendations to
modify and stratify the list of select agents and toxins, the FESAP
utilized expert knowledge of the agents, combined with information from
the DHS's Material Threat Determinations of biological agents and
toxins. Care was used to balance risks identified with the
Congressional mandate to ensure the availability of select agents and
toxins for research and educational activities.
Other sources of input that we have considered in the drafting of
this Proposed Rule include the following: The National Science Advisory
Board for Biosecurity, the National Academies, and comments received
from professional societies and the public in response to the CDC ANPRM
published on July 21, 2010.
The purpose of this notice of proposed rulemaking is to seek public
comment on (1) the appropriateness of the current HHS and Overlap list
of select agents and toxins including whether there are other agents or
toxins that should be added to the HHS or Overlap list or whether
agents or toxins currently on the HHS or Overlap list should be deleted
from the list; (2) the appropriateness of the proposed tiering of the
select agents and toxins list; (3) whether minimum standards for
personnel reliability, physical and cyber security should be prescribed
for identified Tier 1 agents; and (4) any other aspect of the proposed
amendments to the select agent regulations.
II. Proposed Changes to 42 CFR Part 73
Proposed Changes to 42 CFR Part 73
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section No. Current Change
------------------------------------------------------------------------
73.0..................... Applicability and No change.
related
requirements.
73.1..................... Definitions........ Definitions added:
Adjudicated as a mental
defective; alien;
committed to any mental
institution; controlled
substance; crime
punishable by
imprisonment for a term
exceeding 1 year;
indictment; information
security; lawfully
admitted for permanent
residence; mental
institution;
occupational exposure;
recombinant and
synthetic nucleic
acids; restricted
person; unlawful use of
any controlled
substance.
73.2..................... Purpose and scope.. No change.
73.3..................... HHS select agents Designates Tier 1 select
and toxins. agents and toxins; adds
select agents and
toxins; clarifies
language; deletes from
the HHS list.
[[Page 61208]]
73.4..................... Overlap select Designates Tier 1 select
agents and toxins. agents and toxins; adds
select agents and
toxins; clarifies
language; deletes from
the overlap list.
73.5..................... Exemptions for HHS Amends the immediate
select agents and notification list to
toxins. Tier 1 agents.
73.6..................... Exemptions for Amends the immediate
overlap select notification list to
agents and toxins. Tier 1 agents.
73.7..................... Registration and No change.
related security
risk assessments.
73.8..................... Denial, revocation, Clarifies language.
or suspension of
registration.
73.9..................... Responsible Redesignates paragraphs;
Official. adds new paragraphs
(a)(3), (a)(6).
73.10.................... Restricting access Redesignates paragraphs;
to select agents adds new paragraph (e);
and toxins; adds clarifying
security risk language.
assessments.
73.11.................... Security........... Revises regulatory text--
paragraph (b), (c)(2).
Redesignates
paragraphs; adds new
paragraphs (c)(8),
(c)(9), (c)(10), (e).
73.12.................... Biosafety.......... Revises paragraphs (a)
and (c)(1); replaces
``url'' in paragraph
(c)(3); redesignates
paragraph (d); adds new
paragraph (d).
73.13.................... Restricted Clarifies language.
experiments.
73.14.................... Incident response.. Redesignates paragraphs;
adds new paragraphs (d)
and (e).
73.15.................... Training........... Revises paragraph (a);
redesignates
paragraphs; adds new
paragraph (b).
73.16.................... Transfers.......... Redesignates paragraphs;
adds new paragraphs
(f), (h), (l).
73.17.................... Records............ Revises paragraph
(a)(1); redesignates
paragraphs; adds new
paragraph (a)(2).
73.18.................... Inspections........ No changes.
73.19.................... Notification of No changes.
theft, loss, or
release.
73.20.................... Administrative Revises paragraphs.
review.
73.21.................... Civil money No changes.
penalties.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Modifications to the List of HHS Select Agents and Toxins
The following changes to the list of HHS select agents and toxins
are proposed based on comments received in response to the July 21,
2010 ANPRM, recommendations from the FESAP and ISATTAC, and our review
of current scientific data regarding select agents and toxins. As we
discuss below, we are proposing to remove 6 select agents, add 2 select
agents, and identify 11 select agents and toxins as ``Tier 1'' agents
to the HHS list of select agents and toxins.
Proposed Addition of Lujo and Chapare Viruses
On August 19, 2009 (74 FR 41829), we proposed the addition of
Chapare virus to the HHS list of select agents and toxins; we did not
receive any comments regarding that proposal. Based on scientific data
and risks associated with this virus, the ISATTAC recommended the
addition of Chapare virus to the HHS list of select agents and toxins.
The determination to add Chapare virus to the HHS list of select agents
and toxins was based on the following scientific information. The HHS
list currently includes members of the arenaviridae family (Junin,
Machupo, Sabia, Flexal, Guanarito, and Lassa). Arenaviruses are rodent-
borne viruses, some of which can be associated with large hemorrhagic
fever outbreaks, and untreated case fatalities can be in excess of 30
percent. Chapare virus is a recently described New World arenavirus
that is associated with fatal hemorrhagic fever syndrome and is most
closely related to Sabia virus, an HHS select agent (Ref 1). Based on
the ISATTAC recommendation and our examination of the current
scientific data and risks associated with this virus, we are proposing
to add Chapare to the HHS list.
The ISATTAC also recommended the addition of Lujo virus to the HHS
list of select agents and toxins. Based on this recommendation and our
examination of the current scientific data and risks associated with
this virus, we are also proposing to add Lujo virus. The scientific
determination was based on the fact that the Lujo virus caused a fatal
outbreak of hemorrhagic fever, has an unprecedented high case fatality
rate of 80 percent, has been phylogenetically identified as an
arenavirus and is related to those members of the Old World
arenaviridae family (Junin, Machupo, Sabia, Flexal, Guanarito, and
Lassa) listed as HHS select agents that cause hemorrhagic fever and
pose a significant risk to public health and safety (Ref 2).
Proposed Removal of Cercopithecine Herpesvirus 1 (Herpes B Virus)
Commenters acknowledged in response to the July 21, 2010 ANPRM that
(1) the Herpes B virus naturally infects many species of macaques; and
(2) can produce a serious, often fatal, infection in humans when not
treated. However, the commenters argued that Herpes B virus should not
be included as a select agent based on the following assertions:
The inclusion of the virus on the list will produce no
significant improvements in safety for the American public.
Given the high prevalence of infection in non-human
primates and the relatively few human infections that have been
recorded, it suggests that the virus is not easily transmitted to
humans.
The virus is capable of being treated with several
available licensed antiviral compounds.
The virus does not present a sufficient risk of infection
by the aerosol route.
The virus is a highly unlikely candidate for a
bioterrorism agent due to its environmental instability and the need
for direct contact for infection. The argument is further enhanced by
the absence of the virus listed on the NIH's National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases lists of Category A, B & C Priority
Pathogens or the CDC's Category A, B & C Bioterrorism Agents lists.
The virus is widely available in nature.
The ISATTAC and the FESAP also recommended the removal of
Cercopithecine herpesvirus 1 (Herpes B virus) from the HHS list of
select agents and toxins. We agreed with the
[[Page 61209]]
commenters, ISATTAC, and FESAP and propose to remove Cercopithecine
herpesvirus 1 (Herpes B virus) from the HHS list of select agents and
toxins. Our rationale for this proposal is based on the facts that this
virus is not easily transmitted to humans, the person-to-person
transmission risk is small, the numbers of recorded human infections
are low, and multiple licensed antiviral treatments for Herpes B
infections are available.
Proposed Removal of Coccidioides posadasii/Coccidioides immitis
Commenters to our July 21, 2010 ANPRM argued that Coccidioides
posadasii/Coccidioides immitis should not be included as a select agent
based on the following reasons:
The characteristics of Coccidioides species do not provide
convincing properties of an effective agent of bioterrorism.
The fungi are endemic in the southwestern United States,
but do not cause large epidemics even with high prevalence in the air
during wind storms.
Infections caused by the fungi are easily treatable by
licensed antifungal medicines, especially early in disease.
The difficulty to use Coccidioides species as a bioweapon,
and hence the need for strict regulation under the select agent
regulations, is exemplified by their non-communicability, lack of
history of use or development as successful biological weapons, and a
relatively low incidence of symptomatic disease following natural
infection.
Coccidioides species would not be an effective
bioterrorism weapon because the percentage of deaths and
hospitalizations are low considering the number of people infected.
The FESAP also recommended removal of Coccidioides posadasii/
Coccidioides immitis from the HHS list of select agents and toxins. We
agreed with the commenters and FESAP and propose to remove Coccidioides
posadasii/Coccidioides immitis from the HHS list of select agents and
toxins. The scientific determination was based on the availability of
licensed treatments for Coccidioides infection and a lowering of our
assessment of the impact of Coccidioides infection on human health, as
indicated by the high proportion of subclinical cases observed in
endemic areas (Ref 3).
Proposed Retention of Coxiella burnetii
Commenters to the July 21, 2010 ANPRM argued that Coxiella burnetii
(Q fever) should be removed from the select agents and toxins list
based on the following assertions:
Q fever is not contagious and is effectively treated with
licensed antibiotics.
It is generally a self-limiting infection with potential
control by licensed vaccination.
The ubiquitous nature of Coxiella burnetii means that it
can be easily acquired from environmental sources and calls into
question the effectiveness and procedures for maintaining inventories
of select agents.
Person-to-person transmission of the disease is rare and
is fatal less than one percent of the time.
A vaccine is available for this agent internationally, but
not domestically.
The agent is commonly found in animal populations within
the United States.
However, FESAP and ISATTAC did not recommend removing this
bacterium from the HHS list of select agents and toxins. We agreed with
the FESAP and ISATTAC recommendations and propose to retain Coxiella
burnetii on the HHS select agents and toxins list. The determinations
to retain this agent on the HHS list are its robust environmental
stability, ease of transmission to humans, extremely low infectious
dose, and prior association of this agent with offensive programs. CDC
invites comments regarding retaining this agent on the HHS list of
select agents and toxins.
Proposed Removal of South American Genotypes of Eastern Equine
Encephalitis Virus (EEEV)
Commenters on the July 21, 2010 ANPRM regarding the proposed
inclusion of EEEV on the list of select agents and toxins argued that
EEEV should not be included as a select agent based on the following
reasons:
The virus occurs naturally in the environment.
Direct person-to-person transmission does not occur.
Local and State health departments and mosquito control
agencies routinely release information regarding the location of
arboviral activity in the community, so upholding strict biosecurity
measures in a laboratory has little or no impact on reducing a
terrorist's ability to acquire this agent.
Only North American strains of EEEV should be regulated
because transmission patterns limit the distribution and epidemic
potential of South American strains, which are less pathogenic.
We examined the current scientific data and noted that strains of
EEEV can be categorized into two distinct genotypes primarily based
upon geographic distribution: North American genotype (NA EEE) and
South American genotype (SA EEE). The NA EEE genotype consists of
strains obtained from North America and the Caribbean while SA EEE
genotype viruses originate in Central and South America. Viruses in the
two genotypes are distinctly different in their genetics, epidemiology,
and pathogenicity. NA EEE, which are the strains responsible for human
and equine disease, are all genetically very similar to each other
(less than 3% divergence at the nucleotide level) and can be easily
distinguished from SA EEE genotype strains by sequencing. NA EEE
genotype strains differ from SA EEE viruses by greater than 20% at the
nucleotide level and approximately 10% at the amino acid level. Since
FESAP agreed with our scientific assessment that SA EEE genotypes
should be removed from the HHS list of select agents and toxins, we are
proposing to remove SA EEE genotypes from the HHS list of select agents
and toxins (Ref 4).
Proposed Removal of Flexal Virus
Commenters that responded to the July 21, 2010 ANPRM felt that
Flexal virus should be removed from the HHS list of select agents and
toxins based on the lack of severity of disease and the lack of
significant outbreaks of disease associated with infection with this
virus in humans. FESAP also recommended that Flexal virus be removed
from the list. Since our research found a lack of significant outbreaks
of disease associated with Flexal virus in humans and that this virus
would be a highly unlikely candidate for a bioterrorism agent, we are
proposing to remove Flexal virus from the HHS list of select agents and
toxins.
Proposed Retention of Monkeypox Virus
Commenters to the July 21, 2010 ANPRM recommended that Monkeypox
virus should not be included as a select agent based on the following
assertions:
An effective licensed vaccine is available.
Promising antivirals are in advanced stages of
development.
The virus is inefficiently transmitted from person-to-
person.
We examined the current scientific data and noted that there is an
increased incidence of Monkeypox virus in humans as well as studies
identifying the virus being easily transmitted in Gambian rats. A
recent study on an outbreak in Sudan indicates there is much strain
variation in level of infectivity and severity of disease. Concern over
the detection of new lineages with increased pathogenesis has been
expressed. Another recent
[[Page 61210]]
outbreak of Monkeypox virus in the United States suggested numerous
animals could become infected complicating the understanding of
zoonotic maintenance of the virus (Ref 29-33).
While there has been documented cross protection against Monkeypox
virus by Vaccinia virus vaccine, the decrease in the number of
individuals with any immunity to the virus is drastically declining
(since smallpox vaccination no longer occurs). Further, even though
there is a stockpile of Vaccinia virus vaccine available, the vaccine
has numerous undesirable side-effects that make it less than optimal
for mass vaccination. There are also several antiviral treatments for
Monkeypox in advanced stages of development, but they are not currently
available. Thus, there is currently no specific treatment (Ref 29-33).
FESAP recommended keeping Monkeypox virus on the HHS list of select
agents and toxins.
Based on the scientific determination outlined above, we are
proposing to retain Monkeypox virus on the HHS list of select agents
and toxins. We will continue to monitor progress in the development of
antivirals and other means of prevention and control of Monkeypox virus
infections and invite comments on removing a certain clade of Monkeypox
virus (i.e., West African clade of Monkeypox virus) from the HHS list
of select agents and toxins.
Proposed Reorganization of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Complex Viruses
(TBEV)
Even though we received no comments to the July 21, 2010 ANPRM
regarding the removal of these viruses from the HHS list of select
agents and toxins, we are proposing the removal of TBEV Central
European subtype from the HHS list of select agents and toxins for the
following scientific reasons:
The TBEV Central European Tick-borne subtype has been
shown to be less virulent in humans than the Far Eastern subtype (Ref
5).
No TBEV vaccines are licensed or available in the United
States; however two safe, effective inactivated TBEV vaccines are
available internationally.
FESAP also recommended the removal of the TBEV Central European
subtype from the HHS list of select agents and toxins.
In addition to removing the TBEV Central European subtype from the
HHS list of select agents and toxins, we propose to reorganize the
listing of the TBEV to reflect the current nomenclature given by the
International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. For TBEV proper, there
are now just three recognized subtypes: Central European, Far Eastern,
and Siberian. The Russian Spring and Summer encephalitis designation is
no longer recognized (Ref 6). Two other viruses on the HHS list of
select agents and toxins, Kyasanur Forest disease virus and Omsk
Hemorrhagic fever virus, are no longer classified as TBEV. In
recognition of these taxonomic changes, we are proposing to include
these viruses on the HHS list of select agents and toxins as follows:
Tick-borne encephalitis virus
Far Eastern subtype
Siberian subtype
Kyasanur Forest disease virus
Omsk Hemorrhagic fever virus
Proposed Retention of Rickettsia prowazekii and Rickettsia Rickettsii
Commenters that responded to the July 21, 2010 ANPRM argued that
Rickettsia prowazekii and Rickettsia rickettsii should be removed from
the HHS list of select agents and toxins based on the following
assertions:
Mimicking transmission by arthropod vectors in an effort
to disperse these pathogens with the intent to disrupt society would be
challenging and technologically unlikely to be successful.
Common and readily available licensed antibiotics are
highly effective, and contagion is not a threat because spread is
determined by contact with the vectors, not through person-to-person
contact.
Although Rickettsia prowazekii may be a pathogen of
military significance, Rickettsia rickettsii is not. According to the
commenter, propagation of the pathogens requires growth in cultured
host cells and natural infection occurs by parenteral inoculation
through a tick vector, so mass exposure by aerosolization or
contamination of food sources is unlikely to result in disease.
The potential to use this agent as a platform to construct
a genetically engineered new pathogen would be extremely difficult.
The primary disease associated with Rickettsia rickettsii
is Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, and the symptoms are recognizable and
marketed diagnostics and treatment are readily available.
Rickettsia rickettsii should be removed because generation
of even moderate amounts of infectious material is exceedingly
difficult and requires specialized equipment.
Rickettsiae are not spread directly from person-to-person,
would not survive if dispersed into the environment, and are
susceptible to a number of readily available licensed antibiotics. In
addition, there is no possibility of eliminating their presence in the
environment.
Potential benefits of lessening restriction on research
include improved diagnostic capabilities and better potential for
vaccine development.
The FESAP and ISATTAC recommended keeping Rickettsia prowazekii and
Rickettsia rickettsii on the HHS list of select agents and toxins.
Since we agreed with these expert panels, we are proposing to retain
Rickettsia prowazekii and Rickettsia rickettsii on the HHS select
agents and toxins list based on our scientific determination regarding
the environmental stability, low infectious dose, aerosol transmission,
and clinical significance of infection with these organisms.
Proposed Retention of Yersinia pestis
Commenters that responded to the July 21, 2010 ANPRM argued that
Yersinia pestis should not be included as a select agent based on the
following assertions:
Yersinia pestis is naturally occurring and does not
survive for long outside of its rodent host because of susceptibility
to heat and sunlight.
Decontamination of surfaces is highly effective in
limiting its spread.
Licensed treatments are readily available for those who
may become exposed.
The FESAP and ISATTAC recommended that Yersinia pestis remain on
the HHS list of select agents and toxins.
We agree with the FESAP and ISATTAC, and are proposing to keep
Yersinia pestis on the HHS select agents and toxins list based on our
scientific conclusion regarding the bacterium's high mortality rate,
ease of dissemination and production, and person-to-person transmission
of Yersinia pestis infections.
Proposed Reorganization of Staphylococcal Enterotoxins
Commenters to the July 21, 2010 ANPRM suggested that the
regulations needed a clear statement concerning staphylococcal
enterotoxins (SEs) and staphylococcal enterotoxin-like toxins (SEls).
Commenters stated that SEs and SEls have been distinguished from each
other on the basis of emetic activity (Ref 12). Commenters were
confused regarding whether the intent of the select agent regulations
is to acknowledge this difference and not regulate SEls or to regulate
both SEs and SEls.
[[Page 61211]]
ISATTAC recommended that we amend the HHS list of select agents and
toxins to specifically include Staphylococcal enterotoxins A, B, C, D,
and E in the HHS list of select agents and toxins. We agree with the
commenters and the ISATTAC recommendation, and propose to amend the
select agents and toxins list from ``Staphylococcal enterotoxins'' to
specifically include ``Staphylococcal enterotoxins A, B, C, D, and E''
in the HHS list of select agents and toxins (Ref 7-14). Serotypes G, H,
and I should not added to the HHS list of select agents and toxins
because serotypes G, H, and I are at least 10 fold less of a risk than
SEE and SEA (Ref 15-16.) According to the International Nomenclature
Committee for Staphylococcal Superantigens, emesis in a primate model
within five hours post-feeding must be observed to classify an exotoxin
as an enterotoxin (Ref 12). If emesis is not observed in this period of
time, the exotoxin should be classified as enterotoxin-like rather than
enterotoxin. Based on this internationally accepted standard, we are
proposing serotypes J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, T, U, U2 and V should be
designated staphylococcal enterotoxin-like rather than enterotoxin
because these serotypes have been shown to either not cause emesis in a
primate model or have not been tested for emesis (Ref 17-26).
Therefore, we are proposing serotypes J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, T, U, U2
and V should not added to the HHS list of select agents and toxins.
B. Modifications to the List of Overlap Select Agents and Toxins
The following changes to the list of Overlap select agents and
toxins are proposed based on comments received to the July 21, 2010
ANPRM, recommendations from the FESAP and ISATTAC, and our review of
current scientific data regarding select agents and toxins.
Proposed Retention of Bacillus anthracis (Pasteur Strain)
A commenter to the July 21, 2010 ANPRM stated that the Pasteur
strain of Bacillus anthracis should not be considered a select agent
because the strain is attenuated and used for quality control testing
in Laboratory Response Network (LRN) laboratories. The commenter argued
that changing the status of the Pasteur strain would alleviate the
burden of recordkeeping for quality control and proficiency testing
activities.
We made no changes based on this comment. It should be noted that
we excluded Bacillus anthracis Sterne strain in 2003 because the
attenuated strain was determined to not pose a severe threat to public
health and safety, animal health, or animal products. We have not
excluded the plasmid-negative Pasteur variant in order to prevent the
combination of plasmids from Sterne and Pasteur-types of strains to
create a wild type phenotype.
Proposed Retention of Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis, and
Brucella suis
Commenters to the July 21, 2010 ANPRM recommended that Brucella
abortus, Brucella melitensis, and Brucella suis be removed from the
Overlap list of select agents and toxins for the following reasons:
The benefits of removal far exceed any risk mitigated by
continuing the listing. In the years since the organism was first
listed, research and development has been greatly diminished.
As currently regulated, existing BSL-3 facilities do not
have the capacity to conduct brucellosis research with sufficient
numbers of animals to generate statistically valid research results,
and it is too expensive to construct and maintain enough high capacity
BSL-3 facilities to conduct the necessary research. The commenter
contended that any risk currently mitigated by the listing is fully
manageable without such listing.
Brucella abortus and Brucella suis should be removed
because the organisms are adversely affected by environmental
conditions and can be diagnosed and controlled in animals and readily
treated in humans. The classification of these bacteria as select
agents has hampered research that could result in vaccines that would
protect susceptible animal populations. Although brucellosis will
remain a disease of agricultural significance, Brucella abortus and
Brucella suis are not ideal biological weapons. The commenter
suggested, however, that Brucella melitensis remain on the list because
it is a foreign animal disease and the most infectious of all the
species.
Brucella species should have their listed status
reconsidered because human infection is rarely fatal, acute brucellosis
can be readily treated with available antibiotics, human-to-human
transmission is extremely rare, and wildlife carriers in the United
States often come into contact with humans without significant
transmission.
Naturally occurring substances such as Brucella should be
removed because infections regularly occur from natural exposures.
The primary mode of transmission for Brucella abortus is
through contact with contaminated fluids/tissues, its pathogenicity is
moderate, and infections are routinely treated with antibiotics that do
an effective job. The commenter recommended removal of Brucella abortus
strain 1119-3 because the strain is identical using conventional typing
tests to strain 19 and is used as an antigen strain in diagnostic
tests. Strain 19 and RB51 have been excluded as licensed vaccine
products, but other research strains have not been excluded.
Another commenter supported downgrading the risk
assessment for vaccine strains of Brucella. The commenter was concerned
that the only criterion the ISATTAC accepts for exclusion is licensed
drug status, but such a high standard is disadvantageous to research on
this pathogen.
The FESAP and ISATTAC recommended that Brucella abortus, Brucella
melitensis, and Brucella suis remain on the Overlap list of select
agents and toxins. We made no changes based on these comments because
we agreed with these expert panels that Brucella abortus, Brucella
melitensis, and Brucella suis remain on the Overlap list of select
agents and toxins based on the bacteria's ease of production, high
infectivity via the aerosol route, low infectious dose, and no
brucellosis vaccines are currently available for humans in the United
States.
Proposed Retention of Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei
Commenters to the July 21, 2010 ANPRM contended that Burkholderia
mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei should not be included as select
agents based on the following reasons:
The agents do not rise to the same level of public health
threat or feasibility for weaponization that the other agents on the
list do.
Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei are
endemic in a number of areas of the world.
Disease resulting from Burkholderia mallei and
Burkholderia pseudomallei is treatable with low mortality.
It is questionable how they would be used as bioweapons.
The FESAP and ISATTAC recommended that Burkholderia mallei and
Burkholderia pseudomallei remain on the Overlap list of select agents
and toxins. We made no changes based on these comments because we
agreed with these expert panels that Burkholderia mallei and
Burkholderia pseudomallei should remain on the Overlap list of select
agents and toxins based on our scientific determination that the
bacteria
[[Page 61212]]
can be produced in large quantity; transmitted via aerosol; and
Burkholderia pseudomallei is highly stable in the environment. The
mortality rate for untreated cases of both melioidosis and glanders is
high, and given the rarity of these diseases in the United States,
experience in their diagnosis and treatment is limited.
Proposed Reorganization of Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus (VEEV)
Commenters to the July 21, 2010 ANPRM contended that VEEV subtypes
ID and IE should not be included as select agents based on the
following reasons:
Inclusion of VEEV subtypes as select agents should be
based solely on their ability to cause an epidemic or epizootic
following a bioterrorism event. This would require inclusion of only
varieties 1AB and 1C VEEV which have been shown to have epidemic/
epizootic potential.
The reasons for excluding 1D and 1E VEEVs from the select
agent list are: (1) No subtype 1D or 1E VEEV have ever caused large
equine epizootics; (2) Inclusion of 1D viruses because they might be
precursors to 1C viruses is not sufficient for making 1D viruses select
agents. Essentially all of this evidence is laboratory based. The
possibility of a 1D virus mutating to a 1C virus following a
bioterrorism event is unlikely because 1D viruses are unlikely to
establish epidemic or epizootic transmission cycles in the US. Natural
transmission cycles would likely be needed for any evolution from 1D to
1C to occur in nature; (3) Emergency vaccination of equines with
currently approved equine vaccines or humans with IND vaccines (e.g.
TC-83) would interdict or greatly dampen a 1D or a 1E epizootic, based
on antigenic cross-reactivities of subtype 1 viruses; and (4) The
currently available humanized or human anti-VEEV monoclonal antibodies
that could be produced for emergency use would also have prophylactic,
and possibly therapeutic efficacy for all VEEV subtype 1 infections
with which they cross react (includes 1D and 1E viruses).
The FESAP and ISATTAC recommended removal of certain subtypes of
Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus from the Overlap list of select
agents and toxins. Since we agreed with commenters and expert panels
recommendations, we are proposing to clarify that only VEEV subtypes
IAB and IC should remain on the Overlap list of select agents and
toxins because these subtypes contain the only recognized strains of
Venezuelan equine encephalitis that have demonstrated the ability to
cause epidemics or epizootics. The remaining subtypes, ID and IE, are
strains prevalent among the existing animal populations and do not
represent the same type of risk. Other viruses within the Venezuelan
equine encephalitis complex (subtypes IF and II through IV) are
separate viruses and are not included in the HHS and USDA overlap list
of select agents and toxins.
C. Tiering
E.O. 13546 specifies that a subset of the Select Agent List be
categorized as ``Tier 1'' because these agents and toxins present the
greatest risk of deliberate misuse with the most significant potential
for mass casualties or devastating effects to the economy, critical
infrastructure, or public confidence. All but one of the commenters to
the July 21, 2010 ANPRM who addressed the idea of a tiering system
based on the relative bioterrorism risk of each agent or toxin favored
the use of tiers. Several commenters mentioned specific criteria for
tiering. A few commenters expressed the concern that tiering could
create confusion, especially for facilities with multiple Biological
Select Agents and Toxins (BSAT) and had concerns about additional
requirements that would be placed on some laboratories. Some commenters
identified specific Tier 1 candidates from the BSAT listed in 42 CFR
73.3 and Sec. 73.4. Most of these commenters included Variola major
virus and Variola minor virus, as well as Reconstructed 1918 Influenza
virus, Ebola viruses, and Marburg virus in their Tier 1 list. Two
commenters also suggested Bacillus anthracis and Lassa fever virus.
Other commenters suggested Francisella tularensis, South America
hemorrhagic fever viruses, Brucella species, Coxiella burnettii,
Botulinum neurotoxin, and Ricin as candidates for Tier 1.
Based on E.O. 13546, a FESAP recommendation and our agreement with
the comments received, we are proposing to amend the select agent
regulations to establish a number of select agents and toxins as Tier 1
select agents and toxins within the lists of HHS and Overlap select
agents and toxins. All select agents and toxins were scored against 20
criteria by over 60 Subject Matter Experts representing the Federal
life sciences, public health, law enforcement, security, and
intelligence communities, which included:
The relative ease with which a particular select agent or
toxin might be disseminated or transmitted from one human to another or
into the environment where it could produce a deleterious effect upon
human health;
The potential for a high mortality rate;
The potential for a major human health impact;
Select agents or toxins whose misuse might result in
public panic or other social or economic disruption; and
Select agents or toxins whose use might require Federal,
State, and/or local officials to take special action in planning for
major human health disasters.
The select agents that we propose will be designated as Tier 1 are
the following:
HHS
Ebola virus
Francisella tularensis
Marburg virus
Variola major virus
Variola minor virus
Yersinia pestis
Botulinum neurotoxin
Toxin-producing strains of Clostridium botulinum
OVERLAP
Bacillus anthracis
Burkholderia mallei
Burkholderia pseudomallei
Regarding the Reconstructed 1918 Influenza virus, recent studies
have increased our understanding of the public health risks associated
with this agent. Current reports indicate that 60 percent of the
population in the United States is immune to the 1918 Influenza virus
and that antiviral treatments exist (Ref 27-28). Based on this
information we propose to retain the Reconstructed 1918 Influenza virus
on the HHS list of select agents and toxins, but not to include it in
Tier 1 of this list.
Based on the information currently available, we conclude that the
adoption of the Tier 1 designation would not result in significant
economic effects to the regulated community. However, we are asking for
any additional data or comments on the potential effects of designating
the above agents as Tier 1.
D. Responses to Other Comments and Other Proposed Changes
With respect to the remainder of the sections outlined below, we
are proposing the following changes based on comments received in
response to the July 21, 2010 ANPRM and recommendations from the FESAP.
We are proposing to update the Web address throughout the document as
all information concerning the Federal Select Agent Program is now
centralized on the National Select Agent Registry Web site at https://www.selectagents.gov/ gov/. We also are proposing non-substantive changes
throughout the
[[Page 61213]]
regulations for purposes of clarity. In addition, HHS/CDC and USDA/
APHIS made the language similar to ensure consistency between the
regulations.
Exclusions
In order to update the regulations to accurately reflect the way in
which we handle the listing of exclusions, we are proposing to remove
the language stating that exclusions will be published in the Federal
Register. This change is necessary because, while we anticipated
publication of exclusions both in the Federal Register and on the
Internet at the time the regulations were initially created, we have
found that publication on the select agent Web site only has served to
provide the most up-to-date information to the regulated community.
Security
Commenters that responded to the July 21, 2010 ANPRM suggested
security requirements include laboratory handling only by certified,
trained individuals; physical security systems; restricted access; and
security risk assessments. Commenters also identified some criteria for
stratifying, such as making the requirements risk-based, considering
the type of work done at the facility, acknowledging that many threats
are from disgruntled insiders, requiring review of the stratification
by subject matter experts, and taking into account the needs of the
researchers at the facility.
Based on our agreement with the comments received, and input from
the FESAP and stakeholder groups, we are proposing more specific
minimum security standards for Tier 1 select agents or toxins. These
additional requirements would be added as section 73.11(e). We believe
these proposed minimum security standards for Tier 1 select agents
would serve to further mitigate the potential for deliberate misuse of
these select agents and toxins that could result in mass casualties or
devastating effects to the economy, critical infrastructure, or public
confidence.
These proposed changes are based on established security industry
standards with respect to securing high risk material and developed in
accordance with the experience and expertise of the Federal Select
Agent Program and in consultation with DOD, FBI, and DHS security
experts. They are necessary in order to further ensure the safety and
security of those select agents and toxins that are proposed to be
deemed Tier 1 agents. The requirements for working with all other
select agents and toxins would remain unchanged with the exception of
certain miscellaneous changes that are detailed below.
Security of Variola Major Virus and Variola Minor Virus
In recognition of the special public health risks associated with
Variola major virus and Variola minor virus, we are also proposing to
require additional physical security measures over and above those
proposed for Tier 1. These additional requirements would be added as
section 73.11(e)(5) (Security). We believe this change is necessary
because Variola major virus and Variola minor virus were determined to
pose a significantly higher public health risk than the other agents
and toxins that were proposed for the Tier 1 select agents and toxins
list. We also believe that it would not be appropriate to require that
the special security procedures appropriate for Variola major virus and
Variola minor virus be made applicable to other agents or toxins on a
Tier 1 list.
Select Agent Inventory
Many commenters to the July 21, 2010 ANPRM pointed out that the
requirement to account for individual vials of each pathogen is
inappropriate for replicating biological agents. Commenters stated that
this is a costly and burdensome responsibility for laboratories and
their staff and that this requirement should be abolished except for
Tier 1 agents.
We are not proposing any changes to the select agent regulations
based on these comments. Currently, the select agent regulations state
that an accurate, current inventory for each select agent (including
viral genetic elements, recombinant nucleic acids, and recombinant
organisms) held in long-term storage (placement in a system designed to
ensure viability for future use, such as in a freezer or lyophilized
materials) must be maintained. The requirement to account for
individual vials of each pathogen in long term storage is necessary to
ensure the biosecurity of select agents and toxins. Further guidance on
this requirement can be found at https://www.selectagents.gov.
Definitions
In order to improve the clarity of the HHS Select Agent
Regulations, we are proposing to add the following definitions to 42
CFR 73.1, to clarify the terms related to the identification of a
Restricted person: Adjudicated as a mental defective, Alien, Crime
punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year, Committed to
any mental institution, Controlled substance, Indictment, Information
security; Lawfully admitted for permanent residence, Mental
institution, and Unlawful user of any controlled substance. We believe
that these definitions will assist Responsible Officials as well as
those seeking approval to access select agents and toxins to better
understand what status or activities, past or present, might prohibit
such access.
Although these terms were undefined in the Bioterrorism Response
Act, it is evident that Congress modeled many of them after the
disqualifiers that are used by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) when enforcing the Gun Control Act of
1968. Because the purpose of the Select Agent Program differs from
ATF's enforcement actions under the Gun Control Act, we do not believe
that these terms must be defined exactly the same. The Gun Control Act
regulates access to firearms, while the Bioterrorism Response Act
regulates access to biological agents and toxins that the government
has recognized as having the potential to be used as weapons of mass
destruction by the wrong hands.
Nevertheless, we looked at the statutory and regulatory definitions
of these terms under the Gun Control Act when drafting our definitions.
With the exception of the term ``crime punishable by imprisonment for a
term exceeding 1 year,'' we decided to adopt the applicable definitions
used by ATF.
We are proposing to define a ``crime punishable by imprisonment for
a term exceeding 1 year'' as ``any Federal, State, or foreign offense
for which the maximum penalty, whether or not imposed, is capital
punishment or imprisonment in excess of 1 year. What constitutes a
conviction of such a crime shall be determined in accordance with the
law of the jurisdiction in which the proceedings were held. Any
conviction that has been set aside or nullified as a matter of law or
for which a person has been pardoned shall not be considered a
conviction for purposes of this part.'' Contrary to definition of this
term used under the Gun Control Act, we have decided that foreign
offenses should be considered a disqualifier. In doing so we are aware
of the Supreme Court's decision in Small v. United States, 544 U.S. 385
(2005) in which the court, interpreting the provisions of 18 U.S.C.
922(g)(1), held that phrase ``convicted in any court'' refers only to
U.S. courts, not to foreign courts. In its opinion interpreting the Gun
Control Act, the court stated that ``the statute itself and its history
offer only congressional silence'' as to whether Congress considered
whether the statutory
[[Page 61214]]
language included foreign convictions. In the case of the Public Health
Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002
(Bioterrorism and Response Act), we believe Congress spoke clearly
about their desire to limit or deny access to select agents and toxins
for those who have committed serious crimes regardless of where
committed.
We believe that in light of the threat of bioterrorism attacks,
Congress would not want to exclude an individual convicted of a U.S.
offense from having access to BSAT, but still allow access to an
individual convicted in a foreign court of a similar offense.
As a part of the safeguard and security section of the Bioterrorism
Response Act, Congress not only put select agents and toxins off limits
to a ``restricted person,'' as that term is defined by 18 U.S.C. 175b,
but to those who are ``reasonably suspected by any Federal law
enforcement or intelligence agency of'' (1) committing a ``Federal
crime of terrorism'' transcending national boundaries (18 U.S.C.
2332b), (2) the knowing involvement with an organization that engages
in domestic or international terrorism or with any other organization
that engages in international crimes of violence; or (3) being an agent
of a foreign power. We believe it would be an inconsistent reading of
statutory authority to allow the Secretary to limit or deny access to
select agents and toxins to someone identified by the Attorney General
as being reasonably suspected of committing a Federal crime of
terrorism transcending national boundaries but to be powerless in cases
where a person had actually been convicted of a serious crime in a
foreign country. We also believe that the instances of regulation can
be distinguished in that with regard to the Gun Control Act of 1968,
the government is regulating access to guns while with respect to the
Bioterrorism Response Act, the government is regulating access to
biological agents and toxins that the government has recognized as
having the potential to be used in the wrong hands as weapons of mass
destruction.
We specifically request comments on the use of a foreign conviction
as a predicate for denying access to select agents and toxins. We
recognize that there can be significant differences between foreign
convictions and domestic convictions. For example, foreign legal
systems may not provide the same due process safeguards afforded to
citizens of the United States, including impartial tribunals and jury
trials. Additionally, foreign countries may punish conduct that is
permitted under domestic law or may require more severe penalties than
under domestic law. We note that in the past, courts have applied the
criteria set forth in Section 482 of the Restatement (third) of Foreign
Relations Law of the United States (1986) in determining whether a
foreign judgment should be recognized in the United States. That
Section provides that a court in the United States may not recognize a
judgment of the court of a foreign state if the judgment was rendered
under a judicial system that does not provide impartial tribunals or
procedures compatible with due process of law or the court that
rendered the judgment did not have jurisdiction over the defendant in
accordance with the law of the rendering state. It further provides
that a court in the United States need not recognize a judgment of the
court of a foreign state if the court that rendered the judgment did
not have jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action, the
defendant did not receive notice of the proceedings in sufficient time
to enable him to defend, the judgment was obtained by fraud, the cause
of action on which the judgment was based, or the judgment itself, is
repugnant to the public policy of the United States or of the State
where recognition is sought, the judgment conflicts with another final
judgment that is entitled to recognition, or the proceeding in the
foreign court was contrary to an agreement between the parties to
submit the controversy on which the judgment is based to another forum.
We are seeking comment on whether these cri