Indirect Cost Rates for the Damage Assessment, Remediation, and Restoration Program for Fiscal Years 2009 and 2010, 61089-61090 [2011-25373]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 / Notices
We intend to issue preliminary results
of this review no later than 180 days
from the date of initiation, and final
results of these reviews no later than
270 days from the date of initiation. See
section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act.
We will instruct CBP to allow, at the
option of the importer, the posting, until
the completion of the review, of a bond
or security in lieu of a cash deposit for
each entry of the subject merchandise
from An Phu, GODACO, or DOCIFISH
in accordance with section
751(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.214(e). Because An Phu, GODACO,
and DOCIFISH certified that they have
both produced and exported the subject
merchandise, the sales of which are the
bases for these new shipper review
requests, we will apply the bonding
privilege to these three companies only
for subject merchandise which the
respondents both produced and
exported.
This initiation notice serves as
notification to the three companies that
upon initiation of this new shipper
review, the Department will require An
Phu, GODACO, and DOCIFISH to
submit on an ongoing basis complete
transaction information concerning any
sales of subject merchandise to the
United States that were made
subsequent to the period of review in
order to assist in its analysis of the bona
fides of the sales of the three companies.
Interested parties requiring access to
proprietary information in these new
shipper reviews should submit
applications for disclosure under
administrative protective order in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305 and
351.306. This initiation and notice are
in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214 and
351.221(c)(1)(i).
Dated: September 26, 2011.
Gary Taverman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–25426 Filed 9–30–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Indirect Cost Rates for the Damage
Assessment, Remediation, and
Restoration Program for Fiscal Years
2009 and 2010
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:42 Sep 30, 2011
Jkt 223001
Notice of Indirect Cost Rates for
the Damage Assessment, Remediation,
and Restoration Program for Fiscal
Years 2009 and 2010.
ACTION:
The National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration’s
(NOAA’s) Damage Assessment,
Remediation, and Restoration Program
(DARRP) is announcing new indirect
cost rates on the recovery of indirect
costs for its component organizations
involved in natural resource damage
assessment and restoration activities for
fiscal years (FY) 2009 and 2010. The
indirect cost rates for these fiscal years
and dates of implementation are
provided in this notice. More
information on these rates and the
DARRP policy can be found at the
DARRP web site at
www.darrp.noaa.gov.
SUMMARY:
For
further information, contact LaTonya
Burgess at 301–713–4248, ext. 211, by
fax at 301–713–4389, or e-mail at
LaTonya.Burgess@noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The
mission of the DARRP is to restore
natural resource injuries caused by
releases of hazardous substances or oil
under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.), the
Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA) (33
U.S.C. 2701 et seq.), and support
restoration of physical injuries to
National Marine Sanctuary resources
under the National Marine Sanctuaries
Act (NMSA) (16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.).
The DARRP consists of three component
organizations: the Office of Response
and Restoration (ORR) within the
National Ocean Service; the Restoration
Center within the National Marine
Fisheries Service; and the Office of the
General Counsel for Natural Resources
(GCNR). The DARRP conducts Natural
Resource Damage Assessments (NRDAs)
as a basis for recovering damages from
responsible parties, and uses the funds
recovered to restore injured natural
resources.
Consistent with Federal accounting
requirements, the DARRP is required to
account for and report the full costs of
its programs and activities. Further, the
DARRP is authorized by law to recover
reasonable costs of damage assessment
and restoration activities under
CERCLA, OPA, and the NMSA. Within
the constraints of these legal provisions
and their regulatory applications, the
DARRP has the discretion to develop
indirect cost rates for its component
organizations and formulate policies on
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61089
the recovery of indirect cost rates
subject to its requirements.
The DARRP’s Indirect Cost Effort
In December 1998, the DARRP hired
the public accounting firm Rubino &
McGeehin, Chartered (R&M) to: evaluate
the DARRP cost accounting system and
allocation practices; recommend the
appropriate indirect cost allocation
methodology; and determine the
indirect cost rates for the three
organizations that comprise the DARRP.
A Federal Register notice on R&M’s
effort, their assessment of the DARRP’s
cost accounting system and practice,
and their determination regarding the
most appropriate indirect cost
methodology and rates for FYs 1993
through 1999 was published on
December 7, 2000 (65 FR 76611). The
notice and report by R&M can also be
found on the DARRP Web site at
https://www.darrp.noaa.gov.
R&M continued its assessment of
DARRP’s indirect cost rate system and
structure for FYs 2000 and 2001. A
second federal notice specifying the
DARRP indirect rates for FYs 2000 and
2001 was published on December 2,
2002 (67 FR 71537).
In October 2002, DARRP hired the
accounting firm of Cotton and Company
LLP (Cotton) to review and certify
DARRP costs incurred on cases for
purposes of cost recovery and to
develop indirect rates for FY 2002 and
subsequent years. As in the prior years,
Cotton concluded that the cost
accounting system and allocation
practices of the DARRP component
organizations are consistent with
Federal accounting requirements.
Consistent with R&M’s previous
analyses, Cotton also determined that
the most appropriate indirect allocation
method continues to be the Direct Labor
Cost Base for all three DARRP
component organizations. The Direct
Labor Cost Base is computed by
allocating total indirect cost over the
sum of direct labor dollars, plus the
application of NOAA’s leave surcharge
and benefits rates to direct labor. Direct
labor costs for contractors from I.M.
Systems Group (IMSG) were included in
the direct labor base because Cotton
determined that these costs have the
same relationship to the indirect cost
pool as NOAA direct labor costs. IMSG
provided on-site support to the DARRP
in the areas of injury assessment,
natural resource economics, restoration
planning and implementation, and
policy analysis. IMSG continues to
provide on-site support to the DARRP.
Starting in FY 2010, contractors from
Genwest provide on-site support for cost
documentation. A third federal notice
E:\FR\FM\03OCN1.SGM
03OCN1
61090
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 / Notices
specifying the DARRP indirect rates for
FY 2002 was published on October 6,
2003 (68 FR 57672), a fourth notice for
the FY 2003 indirect cost rates appeared
on May 20, 2005 (70 FR 29280), and a
fifth notice for the FY 2004 indirect cost
rates was published on March 16, 2006
(71 FR 13356). The notice for the FY
2005 indirect cost rates was published
on February 9, 2007 (72 FR 6221). The
notice for the FY 2006 rates was
published on June 3, 2008 (73 FR
31679). Finally, the notice for the FY
2007 and FY 2008 rates was published
on November 16, 2009 (74 FR 58948).
Cotton’s reports on these indirect rates
can also be found on the DARRP Web
site at https://www.darrp.noaa.gov.
Cotton reaffirmed that the Direct
Labor Cost Base is the most appropriate
indirect allocation method for the
development of the FY 2009 and FY
2010 indirect cost rates.
The DARRP’s Indirect Cost Rates and
Policies
The DARRP will apply the indirect
cost rates for FY 2009 and FY 2010 as
recommended by Cotton for each of the
DARRP component organizations as
provided in the following table:
DARRP Component organization
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Office of Response
and Restoration
(ORR) ................
Restoration Center
(RC) ...................
General Counsel
for Natural Resources (GCNR)
FY2007
Indirect
rate
(percent)
FY2008
Indirect
rate
(percent)
197.44
142.07
Dated: September 15, 2011.
David Westerholm,
Director, Office of Response and Restoration.
[FR Doc. 2011–25373 Filed 9–30–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–JE–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XA725
Endangered and Threatened Species;
Counterpart Regulations
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce; Fish and Wildlife Service
125.88 (USFWS), Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
90.42
The U.S. Forest Service and
Bureau of Land Management (together,
action agencies) in coordination with
the USFWS and NMFS, have agreed to
revoke the March 4, 2004, National Fire
Plan Counterpart Regulation Alternative
Consultation Agreements (ACAs).
DATES: This is effective on October 1,
2011.
ADDRESSES: The final decision of
revocation is available on the internet at
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/laws/esa/
policies.htm#consultation and https://
www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/
index.html. Action Agency documents,
as well as supporting documentation
used in the preparation of this decision,
will be available for public inspection,
by appointment, during normal business
hours at: NMFS Office of Protected
Resources, 1315 East-West Highway,
Room 13535, Silver Spring, MD 20910
or USFWS, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive,
Arlington, VA 22203.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Angela Somma, NMFS, at 301–427–
8474 or by fax at 301–713–0376; or Rick
SUMMARY:
83.93
49.49
These rates are based on the Direct
Labor Cost Base allocation methodology.
The FY 2009 rates will be applied to
all damage assessment and restoration
case costs incurred between October 1,
2008 and September 30, 2009. The FY
2010 rates will be applied to all damage
assessment and restoration case costs
incurred between October 1, 2009 and
September 30, 2010. DARRP will use
the FY 2010 indirect cost rates for future
fiscal years, beginning with FY 2011,
until subsequent year-specific rates can
be developed.
For cases that have settled and for
cost claims paid prior to the effective
date of the fiscal year in question, the
DARRP will not re-open any resolved
matters for the purpose of applying the
revised rates in this policy for these
fiscal years. For cases not settled and
cost claims not paid prior to the
effective date of the fiscal year in
question, costs will be recalculated
VerDate Mar<15>2010
using the revised rates in this policy for
these fiscal years. Where a responsible
party has agreed to pay costs using
previous year’s indirect rates, but has
not yet made the payment because the
settlement documents are not finalized,
the costs will not be recalculated.
The DARRP indirect cost rate policies
and procedures published in the Federal
Register on December 7, 2000 (65 FR
76611), on December 2, 2002 (67 FR
71537), October 6, 2003 (68 FR 57672),
May 20, 2005 (70 FR 29280), March 16,
2006 (71 FR 13356), February 9, 2007
(72 FR 6221), June 3, 2008 (73 FR
31679), and November 16, 2009 (74 FR
58948) remain in effect except as
updated by this notice.
16:42 Sep 30, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
Sayers, USFWS at 703–358–2171 or by
fax at 703–358–1735.
Section
7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.; hereafter ESA) requires federal
agencies, in consultation with, and with
the assistance of, the Secretaries of
Commerce and Interior, to insure that
any action they authorize, fund, or carry
out is not likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of endangered or
threatened species or destroy or
adversely modify designated critical
habitat. The principles, practices, and
protocols for section 7 consultations are
identified in the ESA, and regulations
promulgated in 1986 for implementing
section 7 (50 CFR, part 402), further
expound the procedural and substantive
requirements for consultation. The
counterpart regulations provide an
optional alternative to the standard
section 7 consultation process, and were
developed specifically for agency
projects that authorize, fund, or carry
out actions that support the National
Fire Plan. Upon entering into an ACA
with the Services, action agencies may
make ‘‘not likely to adversely affect’’
determinations for National Fire Plan
projects without consulting with the
Services. The March 4, 2004, ACAs
included specific requirements for
reporting and conducting periodic
program monitoring of the use of the
counterpart regulations.
NMFS and USFWS reviewed the
projects carried out during years two
through four by the action agencies.
Based on results of the review of these
projects, the relatively limited use of the
counterpart regulations since their
inception, the action agencies’ cursory
assessment of the year five through
seven projects, and the action agencies’
request to revoke the ACAs; NMFS and
USFWS agree to terminate the ACAs
with the action agencies.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: September 20, 2011.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office
of Protected Resources, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–25425 Filed 9–30–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\03OCN1.SGM
03OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 191 (Monday, October 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61089-61090]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25373]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Indirect Cost Rates for the Damage Assessment, Remediation, and
Restoration Program for Fiscal Years 2009 and 2010
AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Indirect Cost Rates for the Damage Assessment,
Remediation, and Restoration Program for Fiscal Years 2009 and 2010.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA's)
Damage Assessment, Remediation, and Restoration Program (DARRP) is
announcing new indirect cost rates on the recovery of indirect costs
for its component organizations involved in natural resource damage
assessment and restoration activities for fiscal years (FY) 2009 and
2010. The indirect cost rates for these fiscal years and dates of
implementation are provided in this notice. More information on these
rates and the DARRP policy can be found at the DARRP web site at
www.darrp.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, contact
LaTonya Burgess at 301-713-4248, ext. 211, by fax at 301-713-4389, or
e-mail at LaTonya.Burgess@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the DARRP is to restore
natural resource injuries caused by releases of hazardous substances or
oil under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.), the Oil Pollution Act
of 1990 (OPA) (33 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.), and support restoration of
physical injuries to National Marine Sanctuary resources under the
National Marine Sanctuaries Act (NMSA) (16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.). The
DARRP consists of three component organizations: the Office of Response
and Restoration (ORR) within the National Ocean Service; the
Restoration Center within the National Marine Fisheries Service; and
the Office of the General Counsel for Natural Resources (GCNR). The
DARRP conducts Natural Resource Damage Assessments (NRDAs) as a basis
for recovering damages from responsible parties, and uses the funds
recovered to restore injured natural resources.
Consistent with Federal accounting requirements, the DARRP is
required to account for and report the full costs of its programs and
activities. Further, the DARRP is authorized by law to recover
reasonable costs of damage assessment and restoration activities under
CERCLA, OPA, and the NMSA. Within the constraints of these legal
provisions and their regulatory applications, the DARRP has the
discretion to develop indirect cost rates for its component
organizations and formulate policies on the recovery of indirect cost
rates subject to its requirements.
The DARRP's Indirect Cost Effort
In December 1998, the DARRP hired the public accounting firm Rubino
& McGeehin, Chartered (R&M) to: evaluate the DARRP cost accounting
system and allocation practices; recommend the appropriate indirect
cost allocation methodology; and determine the indirect cost rates for
the three organizations that comprise the DARRP. A Federal Register
notice on R&M's effort, their assessment of the DARRP's cost accounting
system and practice, and their determination regarding the most
appropriate indirect cost methodology and rates for FYs 1993 through
1999 was published on December 7, 2000 (65 FR 76611). The notice and
report by R&M can also be found on the DARRP Web site at https://www.darrp.noaa.gov.
R&M continued its assessment of DARRP's indirect cost rate system
and structure for FYs 2000 and 2001. A second federal notice specifying
the DARRP indirect rates for FYs 2000 and 2001 was published on
December 2, 2002 (67 FR 71537).
In October 2002, DARRP hired the accounting firm of Cotton and
Company LLP (Cotton) to review and certify DARRP costs incurred on
cases for purposes of cost recovery and to develop indirect rates for
FY 2002 and subsequent years. As in the prior years, Cotton concluded
that the cost accounting system and allocation practices of the DARRP
component organizations are consistent with Federal accounting
requirements. Consistent with R&M's previous analyses, Cotton also
determined that the most appropriate indirect allocation method
continues to be the Direct Labor Cost Base for all three DARRP
component organizations. The Direct Labor Cost Base is computed by
allocating total indirect cost over the sum of direct labor dollars,
plus the application of NOAA's leave surcharge and benefits rates to
direct labor. Direct labor costs for contractors from I.M. Systems
Group (IMSG) were included in the direct labor base because Cotton
determined that these costs have the same relationship to the indirect
cost pool as NOAA direct labor costs. IMSG provided on-site support to
the DARRP in the areas of injury assessment, natural resource
economics, restoration planning and implementation, and policy
analysis. IMSG continues to provide on-site support to the DARRP.
Starting in FY 2010, contractors from Genwest provide on-site support
for cost documentation. A third federal notice
[[Page 61090]]
specifying the DARRP indirect rates for FY 2002 was published on
October 6, 2003 (68 FR 57672), a fourth notice for the FY 2003 indirect
cost rates appeared on May 20, 2005 (70 FR 29280), and a fifth notice
for the FY 2004 indirect cost rates was published on March 16, 2006 (71
FR 13356). The notice for the FY 2005 indirect cost rates was published
on February 9, 2007 (72 FR 6221). The notice for the FY 2006 rates was
published on June 3, 2008 (73 FR 31679). Finally, the notice for the FY
2007 and FY 2008 rates was published on November 16, 2009 (74 FR
58948). Cotton's reports on these indirect rates can also be found on
the DARRP Web site at https://www.darrp.noaa.gov.
Cotton reaffirmed that the Direct Labor Cost Base is the most
appropriate indirect allocation method for the development of the FY
2009 and FY 2010 indirect cost rates.
The DARRP's Indirect Cost Rates and Policies
The DARRP will apply the indirect cost rates for FY 2009 and FY
2010 as recommended by Cotton for each of the DARRP component
organizations as provided in the following table:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY2007 FY2008
Indirect Indirect
DARRP Component organization rate rate
(percent) (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office of Response and Restoration (ORR)........ 197.44 125.88
Restoration Center (RC)......................... 142.07 90.42
General Counsel for Natural Resources (GCNR).... 83.93 49.49
------------------------------------------------------------------------
These rates are based on the Direct Labor Cost Base allocation
methodology.
The FY 2009 rates will be applied to all damage assessment and
restoration case costs incurred between October 1, 2008 and September
30, 2009. The FY 2010 rates will be applied to all damage assessment
and restoration case costs incurred between October 1, 2009 and
September 30, 2010. DARRP will use the FY 2010 indirect cost rates for
future fiscal years, beginning with FY 2011, until subsequent year-
specific rates can be developed.
For cases that have settled and for cost claims paid prior to the
effective date of the fiscal year in question, the DARRP will not re-
open any resolved matters for the purpose of applying the revised rates
in this policy for these fiscal years. For cases not settled and cost
claims not paid prior to the effective date of the fiscal year in
question, costs will be recalculated using the revised rates in this
policy for these fiscal years. Where a responsible party has agreed to
pay costs using previous year's indirect rates, but has not yet made
the payment because the settlement documents are not finalized, the
costs will not be recalculated.
The DARRP indirect cost rate policies and procedures published in
the Federal Register on December 7, 2000 (65 FR 76611), on December 2,
2002 (67 FR 71537), October 6, 2003 (68 FR 57672), May 20, 2005 (70 FR
29280), March 16, 2006 (71 FR 13356), February 9, 2007 (72 FR 6221),
June 3, 2008 (73 FR 31679), and November 16, 2009 (74 FR 58948) remain
in effect except as updated by this notice.
Dated: September 15, 2011.
David Westerholm,
Director, Office of Response and Restoration.
[FR Doc. 2011-25373 Filed 9-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JE-P