Application for Annuity or Lump Sum, 60372-60373 [2011-25108]
Download as PDF
60372
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 189 / Thursday, September 29, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
phrase ‘‘the Office of Human Resources,
the Office of Administrative Services,
the Office of Financial Management, the
Office of FOIA, Records Management,
and Security’’;
■ b. In paragraph (c), remove the phrase
‘‘, prescribes procurement regulations,
enters into contracts, designates
contracting officers, and makes
procurement determinations’’ and add a
period after the word ‘‘payments’’.
■ c. In paragraph (d), remove the phrase
‘‘As the Chief Operating Officer of the
Commission, the Executive Director’’
and add, in its place, the phrase ‘‘The
Chief Operating Officer’’;
§ 200.20c
■
[Removed]
5. Remove § 200.20c.
§ 200.21
11. The authority citation for Part 201
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77s, 77sss, 78w, 78x,
80a–37, and 80b–11; 5 U.S.C. 504(c)(1).
Sections 201.700 and 201.701 are also
issued under sec. 916, Pub. L. 111–203, 124
Stat. 1376.
*
*
*
§ 201.59
*
*
[Amended]
12. In § 201.59, remove the word
‘‘Comptroller’’ and add, in its place, the
words ‘‘Chief Financial Officer’’.
■
PART 204—RULES RELATING TO
DEBT COLLECTION
Subpart B
[Amended]
6. In § 200.21(a), remove the words
‘‘Office of Administrative and Personnel
Management’’ and add, in their place,
the words ‘‘Office of Human
Resources’’.
■
§ 200.24
PART 201—RULES OF PRACTICE
[Amended]
7. In § 200.24:
a. Remove the words ‘‘Office of the
Comptroller’’ in the heading and add, in
their place, the words ‘‘Office of
Financial Management’’;
■ b. Remove the words ‘‘Associate
Executive Director of the Office of the
Comptroller’’ and add, in their place,
the words ‘‘Chief Financial Officer’’;
and
■ c. Remove the words ‘‘Executive
Director’’ and add, in their place, the
words ‘‘Chief Operating Officer’’;
■
■
13. The authority citation for Part 204,
Subpart B, continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5514, 5 CFR 550.1104.
§ 204.32
[Amended]
14. In § 204.32, in the definition of
Program Official, remove the word
‘‘Comptroller’’ and add, in its place, the
words ‘‘Chief Financial Officer’’.
■
§ 204.34
[Amended]
15. In § 204.34(d), remove the words
‘‘Comptroller’s office’’ and add, in their
place, the words ‘‘Office of Financial
Management’’.
■
Dated: September 23, 2011.
By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–24964 Filed 9–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
§ 200.25
■
[Removed and Reserved]
8. Remove and reserve § 200.25.
§ 200.30–13
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
[Amended]
9. In § 200.30–13 remove the words
‘‘Associate Executive Director of the
Office of Financial Management’’ in the
heading and introductory text and add,
in their place, the words ‘‘Chief
Financial Officer’’.
20 CFR Part 217
Subpart J—Classification and
Declassification of National Security
Information and Material
SUMMARY:
■
10a. The authority citation for Part
200, Subpart J, is revised to read as
follows:
tkelley on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with RULES
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77s; 11 U.S.C. 901,
1109(a); E.O. 12356, 47 FR 14874, Apr. 6,
1982; Information Security Oversight Office
Directive No. 1 (47 FR 27836, June 25, 1982).
§ 200.503
[Amended]
10b. In § 200.503, remove the
authority citation following Section
503(b).
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:44 Sep 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
RIN 3220–AB64
Application for Annuity or Lump Sum
Railroad Retirement Board.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Railroad Retirement
Board (Board) amends its regulations to
allow alternative signature methods in
addition to the traditional pen-and-ink
or ‘‘wet’’ signature in order to
implement an electronic application
process which will eventually eliminate
the need to retain paper applications
and make the application process more
convenient for the individuals filing
applications.
DATES: This rule will be effective
September 29, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Martha P. Rico, Secretary to
the Board, Railroad Retirement Board,
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
844 N. Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois
60611–2092.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marguerite P. Dadabo, Assistant General
Counsel, (312) 751–4945, TTD (312)
751–4701.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
5(b) of the Railroad Retirement Act
(RRA) [45 U.S.C. 231d(b)] provides that
an application for any payment under
the Act ‘‘shall be made and filed in such
manner and form as the Board may
prescribe * * *’’ Currently, Part 217 of
the Board’s regulations, which sets out
the rules governing applications made
under the RRA, anticipates that an
application will include a signature on
paper, even where the application itself
may be completed electronically.
In order to provide better service to
our customers, the Board amends
§ 217.17 of its regulations in order to
allow signature alternatives to the
traditional pen-and-ink (‘‘wet’’)
signature. The Board changes the
current title of § 217.17, ‘‘Who may sign
an application’’ to ‘‘What is an
acceptable signature’’ and adds a new
subsection (f) to describe what may be
considered to be an acceptable
signature. The amendment adds two
different types of acceptable signatures.
The first alternate method of signature
that the amendment to § 217.17 allows
is the use of a personal identification
number (PIN) assigned by the agency.
The second alternate method is referred
to as an ‘‘alternative signature’’ or
‘‘signature proxy.’’ The purpose of this
amendment is to allow signature by
attestation. Attestation refers to an
action taken by an employee of the
Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) to
confirm and annotate the RRB records of
(1) An applicant’s intent to file or
complete an application or related form,
(2) the applicant’s affirmation under
penalty of perjury that the information
is correct, and (3) the applicant’s
agreement to sign the application or
related form. The Board expects that use
of attestation to take RRA applications
over the telephone will increase
efficiency and be more convenient for
RRB customers.
Before deciding to propose this
amendment, the Board’s Office of
Programs obtained information about
alternative signature methods used by
the Social Security Administration
(SSA), since it administers a retirement
and disability program comparable to
the Board’s programs under the Railroad
Retirement Act. The Office of Programs
also compared the current RRB
application taking process with a
process using attestation to identify the
differences and determine how those
E:\FR\FM\29SER1.SGM
29SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 189 / Thursday, September 29, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 45 U.S.C. 231d and 45 U.S.C.
231f.
List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 217
tkelley on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with RULES
differences affect the process. Based on
the information obtained from the
comparison and from the SSA, it was
determined that attestation will reduce
our paper flow and handling and will
work well in our current environment
where the Board’s Field Service already
completes most applications by
telephone.
Under both the current and amended
systems, the RRB claims representative
will identify a caller-applicant using our
existing protocol and complete an
application by interviewing the caller
and entering the answers online into the
Application Express (APPLE) system.
APPLE is an online system that
automates the filing of applications for
retirement and survivor benefits and
forwards the applications to the systems
for payment. We now print out a copy
of the completed application to send it
to the applicant for signature and return.
Under attestation, we will instead use
defined scripts like SSA uses to confirm
the applicant’s intent to file; attest to the
reply by entering the answer in APPLE;
print the cover notice with penalty
clause and summary, and review it with
the applicant over the telephone; release
the case in APPLE for processing after
the telephone review of the cover notice
is complete; and send the applicant a
cover notice and summary to keep. We
will advise the applicant to review the
cover notice and summary upon receipt,
and contact the RRB promptly if the
applicant needs to make any
corrections.
Attestation will end the return of
application documents to our offices,
reducing the volume of paper to be
sorted, assigned, reviewed, input,
scanned and indexed by the RRB.
The Board, with the concurrence of
the Office of Management and Budget,
has determined that this is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866, as amended.
Therefore, no regulatory impact analysis
is required. There are no changes to the
information collections associated with
Part 217.
Dated: September 23, 2011.
By Authority of the Board.
Martha P. Rico,
Secretary to the Board.
Railroad employees, Railroad
retirement.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Railroad Retirement
Board amends title 20, chapter II,
subchapter B, part 217 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
Internal Revenue Service
2. Section 217.17 is amended by
revising the section heading and
paragraph (a) and adding paragraph (f)
to read as follows:
[TD 9545]
What is an acceptable signature.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) A claimant who is 18 years old or
older, competent (able to handle his or
her own affairs), and physically able to
sign the application, must sign in his or
her own handwriting, except as
provided in paragraph (e) or paragraph
(f) of this section. A parent or a person
standing in place of a parent must sign
the application for a child who is not
yet 18 years old, except as shown in
paragraph (d) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) An acceptable signature may
include:
(1) A handwritten signature that
complies with the rules set out in
paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), or (e) of this
section; or
(2) In the case of an application being
taken and processed in the Railroad
Retirement Board’s automated claims
system, an electronic signature, which
shall consist of a personal identification
number (PIN) assigned by the Railroad
Retirement Board as described in the
application instructions; or
(3) An alternative signature or
signature proxy acceptable to the
Railroad Retirement Board. An example
of an alternative signature is attestation,
which refers to the action taken by a
Railroad Retirement Board (RRB)
employee of confirming and annotating
RRB records of the applicant’s intent to
file or complete an application or
related form, the applicant’s affirmation
under penalty of perjury that the
information provided is correct, and the
applicant’s agreement to sign the
application or related form.
BILLING CODE P
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Interest and Penalty Suspension
Provisions Under Section 6404(g) of
the Internal Revenue Code
Correction
In rule document number 2011–21164
beginning on page 52259 through 52263
in the issue of August 22, 2011, make
the following corrections:
301.6404–4
[Corrected]
1. On page 52262 in the second
column, in § 301.6404–4(a)(7)(i) third
paragraph, 15 lines from the bottom, the
words ‘‘or Form 886–A’’ were
inadvertently printed in italics. The
words should not have been italicized,
and are corrected as follows, ‘‘Form
886–A.’’
■ 2. On page 52263 in the third column,
in § 301.6404–4(c)(2)(ii) 11 lines down,
article number two (ii) was printed on
a separate line, above the word
‘‘Example.’’ It should appear directly
next to the word ‘‘Example.’’ It is
corrected to appear as follows: (ii)
Example.
■
[FR Doc. C1–2011–21164 Filed 9–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2010–0719–201144; FRL–
9472–2]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio,
Kentucky, and Indiana; CincinnatiHamilton Nonattainment Area;
Determinations of Attainment of the
1997 Annual Fine Particulate
Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
[FR Doc. 2011–25108 Filed 9–28–11; 8:45 am]
1. The authority citation for part 217
continues to read as follows:
Jkt 223001
26 CFR Part 301
RIN 1545–BG75
§ 217.17
■
15:07 Sep 28, 2011
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
■
PART 217—APPLICATION FOR
ANNUITY OR LUMP SUM
VerDate Mar<15>2010
60373
EPA is determining that the
tri-state Cincinnati-Hamilton, OhioKentucky-Indiana, fine particulate
(PM2.5) nonattainment Area (hereafter
referred to as ‘‘the Cincinnati Area’’ or
‘‘Area’’) has attained the 1997 annual
average PM2.5 national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS) and
additionally, that the Area has attained
the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS by its
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29SER1.SGM
29SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 189 (Thursday, September 29, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60372-60373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25108]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
20 CFR Part 217
RIN 3220-AB64
Application for Annuity or Lump Sum
AGENCY: Railroad Retirement Board.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Railroad Retirement Board (Board) amends its regulations
to allow alternative signature methods in addition to the traditional
pen-and-ink or ``wet'' signature in order to implement an electronic
application process which will eventually eliminate the need to retain
paper applications and make the application process more convenient for
the individuals filing applications.
DATES: This rule will be effective September 29, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Martha P. Rico, Secretary to the Board, Railroad Retirement
Board, 844 N. Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marguerite P. Dadabo, Assistant
General Counsel, (312) 751-4945, TTD (312) 751-4701.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 5(b) of the Railroad Retirement Act
(RRA) [45 U.S.C. 231d(b)] provides that an application for any payment
under the Act ``shall be made and filed in such manner and form as the
Board may prescribe * * *'' Currently, Part 217 of the Board's
regulations, which sets out the rules governing applications made under
the RRA, anticipates that an application will include a signature on
paper, even where the application itself may be completed
electronically.
In order to provide better service to our customers, the Board
amends Sec. 217.17 of its regulations in order to allow signature
alternatives to the traditional pen-and-ink (``wet'') signature. The
Board changes the current title of Sec. 217.17, ``Who may sign an
application'' to ``What is an acceptable signature'' and adds a new
subsection (f) to describe what may be considered to be an acceptable
signature. The amendment adds two different types of acceptable
signatures.
The first alternate method of signature that the amendment to Sec.
217.17 allows is the use of a personal identification number (PIN)
assigned by the agency. The second alternate method is referred to as
an ``alternative signature'' or ``signature proxy.'' The purpose of
this amendment is to allow signature by attestation. Attestation refers
to an action taken by an employee of the Railroad Retirement Board
(RRB) to confirm and annotate the RRB records of (1) An applicant's
intent to file or complete an application or related form, (2) the
applicant's affirmation under penalty of perjury that the information
is correct, and (3) the applicant's agreement to sign the application
or related form. The Board expects that use of attestation to take RRA
applications over the telephone will increase efficiency and be more
convenient for RRB customers.
Before deciding to propose this amendment, the Board's Office of
Programs obtained information about alternative signature methods used
by the Social Security Administration (SSA), since it administers a
retirement and disability program comparable to the Board's programs
under the Railroad Retirement Act. The Office of Programs also compared
the current RRB application taking process with a process using
attestation to identify the differences and determine how those
[[Page 60373]]
differences affect the process. Based on the information obtained from
the comparison and from the SSA, it was determined that attestation
will reduce our paper flow and handling and will work well in our
current environment where the Board's Field Service already completes
most applications by telephone.
Under both the current and amended systems, the RRB claims
representative will identify a caller-applicant using our existing
protocol and complete an application by interviewing the caller and
entering the answers online into the Application Express (APPLE)
system. APPLE is an online system that automates the filing of
applications for retirement and survivor benefits and forwards the
applications to the systems for payment. We now print out a copy of the
completed application to send it to the applicant for signature and
return. Under attestation, we will instead use defined scripts like SSA
uses to confirm the applicant's intent to file; attest to the reply by
entering the answer in APPLE; print the cover notice with penalty
clause and summary, and review it with the applicant over the
telephone; release the case in APPLE for processing after the telephone
review of the cover notice is complete; and send the applicant a cover
notice and summary to keep. We will advise the applicant to review the
cover notice and summary upon receipt, and contact the RRB promptly if
the applicant needs to make any corrections.
Attestation will end the return of application documents to our
offices, reducing the volume of paper to be sorted, assigned, reviewed,
input, scanned and indexed by the RRB.
The Board, with the concurrence of the Office of Management and
Budget, has determined that this is not a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866, as amended. Therefore, no regulatory
impact analysis is required. There are no changes to the information
collections associated with Part 217.
List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 217
Railroad employees, Railroad retirement.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Railroad Retirement
Board amends title 20, chapter II, subchapter B, part 217 of the Code
of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 217--APPLICATION FOR ANNUITY OR LUMP SUM
0
1. The authority citation for part 217 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 45 U.S.C. 231d and 45 U.S.C. 231f.
0
2. Section 217.17 is amended by revising the section heading and
paragraph (a) and adding paragraph (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 217.17 What is an acceptable signature.
* * * * *
(a) A claimant who is 18 years old or older, competent (able to
handle his or her own affairs), and physically able to sign the
application, must sign in his or her own handwriting, except as
provided in paragraph (e) or paragraph (f) of this section. A parent or
a person standing in place of a parent must sign the application for a
child who is not yet 18 years old, except as shown in paragraph (d) of
this section.
* * * * *
(f) An acceptable signature may include:
(1) A handwritten signature that complies with the rules set out in
paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), or (e) of this section; or
(2) In the case of an application being taken and processed in the
Railroad Retirement Board's automated claims system, an electronic
signature, which shall consist of a personal identification number
(PIN) assigned by the Railroad Retirement Board as described in the
application instructions; or
(3) An alternative signature or signature proxy acceptable to the
Railroad Retirement Board. An example of an alternative signature is
attestation, which refers to the action taken by a Railroad Retirement
Board (RRB) employee of confirming and annotating RRB records of the
applicant's intent to file or complete an application or related form,
the applicant's affirmation under penalty of perjury that the
information provided is correct, and the applicant's agreement to sign
the application or related form.
Dated: September 23, 2011.
By Authority of the Board.
Martha P. Rico,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-25108 Filed 9-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P