Modification of Interlibrary Loan Fee Schedule; Correction, 60395-60396 [2011-24367]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 189 / Thursday, September 29, 2011 / Proposed Rules
d. In paragraph (e) introductory text,
by adding a sentence after the second
sentence to read as set forth below.
e. By adding a sentence after the
paragraph (e)(1) introductory text
heading to read as set forth below.
§ 305.9
Irradiation treatment requirements.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(1) Where certified irradiation
facilities are available, an approved
irradiation treatment may be conducted
for any imported regulated article either
prior to shipment to the United States
or in the United States. For any
regulated article moved interstate from
Hawaii or U.S. territories, irradiation
treatment may be conducted either prior
to movement to the mainland United
States or in the mainland United States.
Irradiation facilities may be located in
any State on the mainland United
States. For irradiation facilities located
in the States of Alabama, Arizona,
California, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky,
Louisiana, Mississippi, Nevada, New
Mexico, North Carolina, South Carolina,
Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia, the
following additional conditions must be
met:
(i) Prospective facility operators must
submit a detailed layout of the facility
site and its location to APHIS. APHIS
will evaluate plant health risks based on
the proposed location and layout of the
facility site. APHIS will only approve a
proposed facility if the Administrator
determines that regulated articles can be
safely transported to the facility from
port of entry or points of origin in the
United States.
(ii) The government of the State in
which the facility is to be located must
concur in writing with the
establishment of the facility or, if it does
not concur, must provide a written
explanation of concern based on pest
risks. In instances where the State
government does not concur with the
proposed facility location, APHIS and
the State will agree on a strategy to
resolve the pest risk concerns prior to
APHIS approval.
(iii) Untreated articles may not be
removed from their packaging prior to
treatment under any circumstances.
(iv) The facility must have
contingency plans, approved by APHIS,
for safely destroying or disposing of
regulated articles if the facility is unable
to properly treat a shipment.
(v) The facility may only treat articles
approved by APHIS for treatment at the
facility. Approved articles will be listed
in the compliance agreement required in
paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section.
(vi) Arrangements for treatment must
be made before the departure of a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:00 Sep 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
consignment from its port of entry or
points of origin in the United States.
APHIS and the facility must agree on all
parameters, such as time, routing, and
conveyance, by which the consignment
will move from the port of entry or
points of origin in the United States to
the treatment facility.
(vii) Regulated articles must be
conveyed to the facility in a refrigerated
(via motorized refrigeration equipment
or other methods including ice or
insulation) or air-conditioned
conveyance at a temperature that
minimizes the mobility of the pests of
concern for the article.
(viii) The facility must maintain and
provide APHIS with an updated map
identifying places where horticultural or
other crops are grown within 4 square
miles of the facility. Proximity of host
material to the facility will necessitate
trapping or other pest monitoring
activities to help prevent establishment
of any escaped pests of concern, as
approved by APHIS; these activities will
be listed in the compliance agreement
required in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this
section. The treatment facility must
have a pest management plan within the
facility.
(ix) The facility must comply with
any additional requirements that APHIS
may require to prevent the escape of
plant pests during transport to and from
the irradiation facility itself, for a
particular facility based on local
conditions, and for any other risk factors
of concern. These activities will be
listed in the compliance agreement
required in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * * Other agencies that have
regulatory oversight and requirements
must concur in writing with the
establishment of the facility prior to
APHIS approval.
(c) * * * Compliance agreements for
facilities located in States listed in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section may also
contain additional provisions as
described in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through
(a)(1)(ix) of this section. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * * Facilities must be located
within the local commuting area for
APHIS employees for inspection
purposes.
(1) * * * Facilities shall be located
within an area over which the U.S.
Department of Homeland Security is
assigned authority to accept entries of
merchandise, to collect duties, and to
enforce the provisions of the customs
and navigation laws in force. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
60395
PART 319—FOREIGN QUARANTINE
NOTICES
3. The authority citation for part 319
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772, and
7781–7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR
2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
§ 319.56–46
[Amended]
4. Section § 319.56–46 is amended as
follows:
a. In paragraph (a), by removing the
words ‘‘in India’’.
b. In paragraph (e) introductory text,
by removing the words ‘‘certifying that
the fruit received the required
irradiation treatment. The phytosanitry
certificate must also bear’’ and adding
the word ‘‘with’’ in their place.
§ 319.56–47
[Amended]
5. Section 319.56–47 is amended as
follows:
a. In paragraph (b), by removing the
second sentence.
b. In paragraph (c)(1), by removing the
words ‘‘that the litchi were treated with
irradiation as described in paragraph (b)
of this section and’’.
c. In paragraph (c)(2), by removing the
words ‘‘with an additional declaration
stating that the longan, mango,
mangosteen, pineapple, or rambutan
were treated with irradiation as
described in paragraph (b) of this
section’’.
Done in Washington, DC, this 22nd day of
September 2011.
Edward Avalos,
Under Secretary for Marketing and Regulatory
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2011–25092 Filed 9–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Research Service
7 CFR Part 505
Modification of Interlibrary Loan Fee
Schedule; Correction
Agricultural Research Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.
AGENCY:
The proposed rule published
in the Federal Register on September
16, 2011 (76 FR 57681) announced
Agricultural Research Service intent to
seek comments on renewing the
National Agricultural Library’s
regulation to increase the interlibrary
loan fees. This document corrects the
RIN number.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kay
Derr, 301–504–5879.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29SEP1.SGM
29SEP1
60396
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 189 / Thursday, September 29, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Correction
In the Federal Register of September
16, 2011, in FR Doc. 2011–23723, on
pages 57681–57682 in the heading
section, correct the RIN number to read
as follows: RIN 0518–AA04
Yvette Anderson,
Federal Register Liaison Officer for
Agricultural Research Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–24367 Filed 9–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–1040; Directorate
Identifier 2011–CE–029–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Piaggio Aero
Industries S.p.A. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Piaggio Aero Industries S.p.A. Model
P–180 airplanes. This proposed AD
results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
One event of in-flight baggage door
opening occurred on an in-service aeroplane
due to a defective locking mechanism or
installation thereof; the BAG DOOR warning
light went on properly before the event, but
was ignored by the pilot, who misinterpreted
it as a false warning.
NOTE: False in-service BAG DOOR
warnings had occurred on other P.180
aeroplanes, and Piaggio Aero Industries (PAI)
had issued Service Bulletin (SB) No. 80–0223
revision 1 to improve the installation of the
baggage door warning microswitch and to
modify the locking mechanism if necessary.
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could lead to in-flight detachment
of the door, which could hit and damage the
left propeller and/or the vertical or horizontal
stabilizer, possibly resulting in loss of control
of the aeroplane, or in injuries to persons or
damage to property on the ground.
Instances of the baggage door open light
illuminating have occurred when the
baggage door was not open. This
condition, if not corrected, could result
in the pilot disregarding a valid
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:00 Sep 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
warning. The proposed AD would
require actions that are intended to
address the unsafe condition described
in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by November 14,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Piaggio Aero
Industries S.p.A.-Airworthiness Office,
Via Luigi Cibrario, 4–16154 GenovaItaly; phone: +39 010 6481353; fax: +39
010 6481881; e-mail:
airworthiness@piaggioaero.it; Internet:
https://www.piaggioaero.com/#/en/aftersales/service-support. You may review
copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call (816) 329–4148.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mike Kiesov, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone: (816) 329–4144; fax: (816)
329–4090; e-mail: mike.kiesov@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
to an address listed under the
section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2011–1040; Directorate Identifier
2011–CE–029–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
regulations.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
ADDRESSES
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA AD No.:
2011–0132, dated July 12, 2011 (referred
to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct
an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
One event of in-flight baggage door
opening occurred on an in-service aeroplane
due to a defective locking mechanism or
installation thereof; the BAG DOOR warning
light went on properly before the event, but
was ignored by the pilot, who misinterpreted
it as a false warning.
NOTE: false in-service BAG DOOR
warnings had occurred on other P.180
aeroplanes, and Piaggio Aero Industries (PAI)
had issued Service Bulletin (SB) No. 80–0223
revision 1 to improve the installation of the
baggage door warning microswitch and to
modify the locking mechanism if necessary.
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could lead to in-flight detachment
of the door, which could hit and damage the
left propeller and/or the vertical or horizontal
stabilizer, possibly resulting in loss of control
of the aeroplane, or in injuries to persons or
damage to property on the ground.
This AD requires an inspection of the
locking mechanism of the baggage door and
its proper adjustment, in accordance with
PAI SB No. 80–0289 revision 1; if baggage
door lockpins do not reach the correct
engagement, or false BAG DOOR warnings
were reported by flight crew, this AD
requires also a modification of the door
mechanism in accordance with PAI SB No.
80–0223 revision 1.
Instances of the baggage door open light
illuminating have occurred when the
baggage door was not open. This
condition, if not corrected, could result
in the pilot disregarding a valid
warning. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in
the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Piaggio Aero Industries S.p.A. has
issued Service Bulletin No. 80–0223,
E:\FR\FM\29SEP1.SGM
29SEP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 189 (Thursday, September 29, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 60395-60396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24367]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Research Service
7 CFR Part 505
Modification of Interlibrary Loan Fee Schedule; Correction
AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The proposed rule published in the Federal Register on
September 16, 2011 (76 FR 57681) announced Agricultural Research
Service intent to seek comments on renewing the National Agricultural
Library's regulation to increase the interlibrary loan fees. This
document corrects the RIN number.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kay Derr, 301-504-5879.
[[Page 60396]]
Correction
In the Federal Register of September 16, 2011, in FR Doc. 2011-
23723, on pages 57681-57682 in the heading section, correct the RIN
number to read as follows: RIN 0518-AA04
Yvette Anderson,
Federal Register Liaison Officer for Agricultural Research Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-24367 Filed 9-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
