Medicaid Program: Money Follows the Person Rebalancing Demonstration Program, 60050-60051 [2011-24986]

Download as PDF 60050 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2011 / Notices First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20417, telephone (202) 501–4755. Please cite OMB Control No. 9000–0024, Buy American Act Certificate, in all correspondence. Dated: September 23, 2011. Laura Auletta, Acting Director, Office of Governmentwide Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition Policy. [FR Doc. 2011–24905 Filed 9–27–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION [OMB Control No. 9000–0001; Docket No. 2011–0079; Sequence 8] Submission for OMB Review; Federal Acquisition Regulation; Standard Form 28, Affidavit of Individual Surety Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). ACTION: Notice of request for a extension to an existing OMB clearance. AGENCIES: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Regulatory Secretariat (MVCB) will be submitting to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request to review and approve an extension of a currently approved information collection requirement concerning Standard Form 28, Affidavit of Individual Surety. A request for public comments was published in the Federal Register at 76 FR 22706, on April 22, 2011. Two comments were received. Public comments are particularly invited on: Whether this collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of functions of the FAR, and whether it will have practical utility; whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection of information is accurate, and based on valid assumptions and methodology; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways in which we can minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, through the use of appropriate technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology. DATES: Submit comments on or before October 28, 2011. sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:20 Sep 27, 2011 Jkt 223001 Submit comments identified by Information Collection 9000–0001, Standard Form 28, Affidavit of Individual Surety, by any of the following methods: • Regulations.gov: https:// www.regulations.gov. Submit comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by inputting ‘‘Information Collection 9000– 0001, Standard Form 28, Affidavit of Individual Surety’’ under the heading ‘‘Enter Keyword or ID’’ and selecting ‘‘Search’’. Select the link ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that corresponds with ‘‘Information Collection 9000–0001, Standard Form 28, Affidavit of Individual Surety’’. Follow the instructions provided at the ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ screen. Please include your name, company name (if any), and ‘‘Information Collection 9000–0001, Standard Form 28, Affidavit of Individual Surety’’ on your attached document. • Fax: 202–501–4067. • Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory Secretariat (MVCB), 1275 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20417. ATTN: Hada Flowers/IC 9000–0001, Standard Form 28, Affidavit of Individual Surety. Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite Information Collection 9000–0001, Standard Form 28, Affidavit of Individual Surety, in all correspondence related to this collection. All comments received will be posted without change to https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal and/or business confidential information provided. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cecelia Davis, Procurement Analyst, Federal Acquisition Policy Division, GSA (202) 219–0202 or Cecelia.davis@gsa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ADDRESSES: A. Purpose The Affidavit of Individual Surety (Standard Form (SF) 28) is used by all executive agencies, including the Department of Defense, to obtain information from individuals wishing to serve as sureties to Government bonds. To qualify as a surety on a Government bond, the individual must show a net worth not less than the penal amount of the bond on the SF 28. It is an elective decision on the part of the maker to use individual sureties instead of other available sources of surety or sureties for Government bonds. The information on SF 28 is used to assist the contracting officer in determining the acceptability of individuals proposed as sureties. A notice published in the Federal Register at 76 FR 22706, April 22, 2011 PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 and two comments were received. Both commenters support the extension of this information collection. In addition to supporting the extension, both commenters suggested some revisions/ enhancements to the current Standard Form 28. These suggestions will be taken into consideration. The decrease in the total burden hours is a result of the change in the ‘‘Response per Respondent’’ and ‘‘Hours per Response’’ categories. The 1.43, responses per respondent, has been lowered to 1. to adequately reflect this category. A respondent has to respond completely not partially when submitting this form. The ‘‘Hours per Response’’ category has been decreased to .3 (18 minutes) from .4 (24 minutes) to reflect the benefit of the electronic capability of fillable-fileable forms. Respondents no longer have to print, scan, and then electronically submit or print and then physically mail forms through the post office, they can now submit electronically. B. Annual Reporting Burden Respondents: 500. Responses Per Respondent: 1. Total Responses: 500. Hours Per Response: 0.3. Total Burden Hours: 150. Obtaining Copies of Proposals: Requesters may obtain a copy of the information collection documents from the General Services Administration, Regulatory Secretariat (MVCB), 1275 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20417, telephone (202) 501–4755. Please cite OMB Control No. 9000–0001, Standard Form 28, Affidavit of Individual Surety, in all correspondence. Dated: September 21, 2011. Laura Auletta, Acting Director, Office of Governmentwide Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition Policy. [FR Doc. 2011–24906 Filed 9–27–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Medicaid Program: Money Follows the Person Rebalancing Demonstration Program Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: This notice creates an expansion to an existing award under the Money Follows the Person SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM 28SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2011 / Notices Demonstration grant. The program supports the movement of Medicaid beneficiaries with disabling and chronic conditions from institutions into the community. The award expands already funded tasks related to quality technical assistance provided to State grantees. DATES: Effective Date: The program expansion is effective on the date of award (before September 30, 2011 through April 15, 2013). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anita Yuskauskas, (410) 786–0268. Arun Natarajan, (410) 786–7455. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES I. Background The need for additional funds is the result of an increase in the number of Money Follows the Person (MFP) State Grantees through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Affordable Care Act) (Pub. L. 111–148, enacted on March 23, 2010). Fifteen additional States received new MFP funds in January, 2011 under the Affordable Care Act. The increase in the number of States and programs resulting from the Affordable Care Act place more demand on the need for technical assistance to States developing and implementing quality improvement strategies, particularly given the complexity and vulnerability of the populations being served in MFP and the Congress’ commitment to the Grant Program’s success. The expansion was not calculated in the original National Quality Enterprise (NQE) budget because at the time of the original award, the Affordable Care Act money was not included in CMS’ budget allocation. The additional resources are necessary to assure the success of the individual placements, specifically, by facilitating sufficient quality mechanisms to address the unique needs of the populations with disabling and chronic conditions. These are the most vulnerable populations and a lack of quality and oversight mechanisms in place, may place individuals at risk. II. Provisions of the Notice We solicited a proposal from Thomson Reuters Healthcare to expand the National Home and CommunityBased Services (HCBS) Quality Enterprise beyond the grant’s present scope. The expansion was created by section 2403 of the Affordable Care Act, which amended section 6071 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, the Money Follows the Person Rebalancing VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:20 Sep 27, 2011 Jkt 223001 Demonstration. The provision expanded previous legislation to support State and CMS efforts to improve quality in a ‘‘rebalanced’’ long-term support system, and to demonstrate the ongoing benefits from and need for an effective HCBS QI Enterprise. The grant offered $1.2 million over 2 years through a program expansion supplement. We requested that the Thomson Reuters Healthcare submit an abbreviated application addressing the expansion of the existing grant. The Grantee provided an updated quality technical assistance model and work plan focused on the following four major goals: • Development of a process demonstrating consistency between the Grantee and CMS, and across all Grantee staff and subcontractors for providing technical assistance (Project Management, 1.1). • The provision of technical assistance to states related to quality in home and community-based services programs (Technical Assistance, 2.1b). • The provision of technical assistance to CMS staff related to the oversight of quality in HCBS programs (Technical Assistance, 2.1c). • The ongoing development and maintenance of a national HCBS quality web-based technical assistance site and quality TA manuscripts (Technical Assistance, 2.1d and e). As part of the application, based on the four major goals listed above, the Grantee submitted a 3 page project narrative describing the activities, and an accompanying budget revision, related to Grant #1LICMS030329/01, entitled ‘‘The National HCBS Quality Enterprise: Assisting States to Achieve Enhanced Quality in a Rebalanced Environment’’. The documents included the following: • Cover Letter—The letter included the current project director’s name and a brief summary of the proposed project, submitted and signed by the authorized representative for this grant. • SF–424a (Budget Information—Non Construction Programs)—The applicant provided the total costs for the remainder of the project for $1.2 million, with a break out of those costs in Section B ‘‘Budget Categories’’ of the SF–424a form. The costs proposed were for the additional costs only (not the cumulative total costs of the entire grant). • Detailed Budget Narrative—The applicant provided a detailed PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 60051 breakdown of the aggregate numbers for the budget recorded on the Standard Form 424a ‘‘Budget Information—Non Constructions Programs,’’ including allocations for each major set of activities or proposed tasks. The proposed budget justification clearly described each cost element in the related budget category. • Project Narrative—The project narrative (approximately 3 pages in length) provided a concise and complete description of the proposed project. It contained the information necessary for CMS to fully understand the additional work of the project. It covered all aspects of the project requirements (see criteria for writing the project narrative—four major goals). Authority: Section 6071 Deficit Reduction Act of 2005. Dated: September 20, 2011. Daniel F. Kane, Chief Grants Management Officer, Office of Acquisition and Grants Management, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. [FR Doc. 2011–24986 Filed 9–27–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4120–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Children and Families Proposed Information Collection Activity; Comment Request Proposed Projects Title: State Council on Developmental Disabilities Program Performance Report. OMB No.: 0980–0172. Description: A Developmental Disabilities Council Program Performance Report is required by federal statute. Each State Developmental Disabilities Council must submit an annual report for the preceding fiscal year of activities and accomplishments. Information provided in the Program Performance Report will be used (1) in the preparation of the biennial Report to the President, the Congress, and the National Council on Disabilities and (2) to provide a national perspective on program accomplishments and continuing challenges. This information will also be used to comply with requirements in the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993. Respondents: State Governments. E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM 28SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60050-60051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24986]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services


Medicaid Program: Money Follows the Person Rebalancing 
Demonstration Program

AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice creates an expansion to an existing award under 
the Money Follows the Person

[[Page 60051]]

Demonstration grant. The program supports the movement of Medicaid 
beneficiaries with disabling and chronic conditions from institutions 
into the community. The award expands already funded tasks related to 
quality technical assistance provided to State grantees.

DATES: Effective Date: The program expansion is effective on the date 
of award (before September 30, 2011 through April 15, 2013).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anita Yuskauskas, (410) 786-0268.
Arun Natarajan, (410) 786-7455.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background

    The need for additional funds is the result of an increase in the 
number of Money Follows the Person (MFP) State Grantees through the 
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Affordable Care Act) (Pub. 
L. 111-148, enacted on March 23, 2010). Fifteen additional States 
received new MFP funds in January, 2011 under the Affordable Care Act. 
The increase in the number of States and programs resulting from the 
Affordable Care Act place more demand on the need for technical 
assistance to States developing and implementing quality improvement 
strategies, particularly given the complexity and vulnerability of the 
populations being served in MFP and the Congress' commitment to the 
Grant Program's success. The expansion was not calculated in the 
original National Quality Enterprise (NQE) budget because at the time 
of the original award, the Affordable Care Act money was not included 
in CMS' budget allocation.
    The additional resources are necessary to assure the success of the 
individual placements, specifically, by facilitating sufficient quality 
mechanisms to address the unique needs of the populations with 
disabling and chronic conditions. These are the most vulnerable 
populations and a lack of quality and oversight mechanisms in place, 
may place individuals at risk.

II. Provisions of the Notice

    We solicited a proposal from Thomson Reuters Healthcare to expand 
the National Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) Quality 
Enterprise beyond the grant's present scope. The expansion was created 
by section 2403 of the Affordable Care Act, which amended section 6071 
of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, the Money Follows the Person 
Rebalancing Demonstration. The provision expanded previous legislation 
to support State and CMS efforts to improve quality in a ``rebalanced'' 
long-term support system, and to demonstrate the ongoing benefits from 
and need for an effective HCBS QI Enterprise. The grant offered $1.2 
million over 2 years through a program expansion supplement.
    We requested that the Thomson Reuters Healthcare submit an 
abbreviated application addressing the expansion of the existing grant. 
The Grantee provided an updated quality technical assistance model and 
work plan focused on the following four major goals:
     Development of a process demonstrating consistency between 
the Grantee and CMS, and across all Grantee staff and subcontractors 
for providing technical assistance (Project Management, 1.1).
     The provision of technical assistance to states related to 
quality in home and community-based services programs (Technical 
Assistance, 2.1b).
     The provision of technical assistance to CMS staff related 
to the oversight of quality in HCBS programs (Technical Assistance, 
2.1c).
     The ongoing development and maintenance of a national HCBS 
quality web-based technical assistance site and quality TA manuscripts 
(Technical Assistance, 2.1d and e).
    As part of the application, based on the four major goals listed 
above, the Grantee submitted a 3 page project narrative describing the 
activities, and an accompanying budget revision, related to Grant 
1LICMS030329/01, entitled ``The National HCBS Quality 
Enterprise: Assisting States to Achieve Enhanced Quality in a 
Rebalanced Environment''.
    The documents included the following:
     Cover Letter--The letter included the current project 
director's name and a brief summary of the proposed project, submitted 
and signed by the authorized representative for this grant.
     SF-424a (Budget Information--Non Construction Programs)--
The applicant provided the total costs for the remainder of the project 
for $1.2 million, with a break out of those costs in Section B ``Budget 
Categories'' of the SF-424a form. The costs proposed were for the 
additional costs only (not the cumulative total costs of the entire 
grant).
     Detailed Budget Narrative--The applicant provided a 
detailed breakdown of the aggregate numbers for the budget recorded on 
the Standard Form 424a ``Budget Information--Non Constructions 
Programs,'' including allocations for each major set of activities or 
proposed tasks. The proposed budget justification clearly described 
each cost element in the related budget category.
     Project Narrative--The project narrative (approximately 3 
pages in length) provided a concise and complete description of the 
proposed project. It contained the information necessary for CMS to 
fully understand the additional work of the project. It covered all 
aspects of the project requirements (see criteria for writing the 
project narrative--four major goals).

    Authority: Section 6071 Deficit Reduction Act of 2005.

    Dated: September 20, 2011.
Daniel F. Kane,
Chief Grants Management Officer, Office of Acquisition and Grants 
Management, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2011-24986 Filed 9-27-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.