Medicaid Program: Money Follows the Person Rebalancing Demonstration Program, 60050-60051 [2011-24986]
Download as PDF
60050
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2011 / Notices
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20417,
telephone (202) 501–4755. Please cite
OMB Control No. 9000–0024, Buy
American Act Certificate, in all
correspondence.
Dated: September 23, 2011.
Laura Auletta,
Acting Director, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011–24905 Filed 9–27–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 9000–0001; Docket No.
2011–0079; Sequence 8]
Submission for OMB Review; Federal
Acquisition Regulation; Standard Form
28, Affidavit of Individual Surety
Department of Defense (DOD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for a extension
to an existing OMB clearance.
AGENCIES:
Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Regulatory
Secretariat (MVCB) will be submitting to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) a request to review and approve
an extension of a currently approved
information collection requirement
concerning Standard Form 28, Affidavit
of Individual Surety. A request for
public comments was published in the
Federal Register at 76 FR 22706, on
April 22, 2011. Two comments were
received.
Public comments are particularly
invited on: Whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of functions of the FAR,
and whether it will have practical
utility; whether our estimate of the
public burden of this collection of
information is accurate, and based on
valid assumptions and methodology;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways in which we can
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, through the use of appropriate
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
October 28, 2011.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:20 Sep 27, 2011
Jkt 223001
Submit comments
identified by Information Collection
9000–0001, Standard Form 28, Affidavit
of Individual Surety, by any of the
following methods:
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
inputting ‘‘Information Collection 9000–
0001, Standard Form 28, Affidavit of
Individual Surety’’ under the heading
‘‘Enter Keyword or ID’’ and selecting
‘‘Search’’. Select the link ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ that corresponds with
‘‘Information Collection 9000–0001,
Standard Form 28, Affidavit of
Individual Surety’’. Follow the
instructions provided at the ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ screen. Please include your
name, company name (if any), and
‘‘Information Collection 9000–0001,
Standard Form 28, Affidavit of
Individual Surety’’ on your attached
document.
• Fax: 202–501–4067.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
(MVCB), 1275 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20417. ATTN: Hada
Flowers/IC 9000–0001, Standard Form
28, Affidavit of Individual Surety.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite Information Collection
9000–0001, Standard Form 28, Affidavit
of Individual Surety, in all
correspondence related to this
collection. All comments received will
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal and/or business confidential
information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cecelia Davis, Procurement Analyst,
Federal Acquisition Policy Division,
GSA (202) 219–0202 or
Cecelia.davis@gsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
A. Purpose
The Affidavit of Individual Surety
(Standard Form (SF) 28) is used by all
executive agencies, including the
Department of Defense, to obtain
information from individuals wishing to
serve as sureties to Government bonds.
To qualify as a surety on a Government
bond, the individual must show a net
worth not less than the penal amount of
the bond on the SF 28. It is an elective
decision on the part of the maker to use
individual sureties instead of other
available sources of surety or sureties
for Government bonds.
The information on SF 28 is used to
assist the contracting officer in
determining the acceptability of
individuals proposed as sureties.
A notice published in the Federal
Register at 76 FR 22706, April 22, 2011
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and two comments were received. Both
commenters support the extension of
this information collection. In addition
to supporting the extension, both
commenters suggested some revisions/
enhancements to the current Standard
Form 28. These suggestions will be
taken into consideration.
The decrease in the total burden
hours is a result of the change in the
‘‘Response per Respondent’’ and ‘‘Hours
per Response’’ categories. The 1.43,
responses per respondent, has been
lowered to 1. to adequately reflect this
category. A respondent has to respond
completely not partially when
submitting this form. The ‘‘Hours per
Response’’ category has been decreased
to .3 (18 minutes) from .4 (24 minutes)
to reflect the benefit of the electronic
capability of fillable-fileable forms.
Respondents no longer have to print,
scan, and then electronically submit or
print and then physically mail forms
through the post office, they can now
submit electronically.
B. Annual Reporting Burden
Respondents: 500.
Responses Per Respondent: 1.
Total Responses: 500.
Hours Per Response: 0.3.
Total Burden Hours: 150.
Obtaining Copies of Proposals:
Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from
the General Services Administration,
Regulatory Secretariat (MVCB), 1275
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20417,
telephone (202) 501–4755. Please cite
OMB Control No. 9000–0001, Standard
Form 28, Affidavit of Individual Surety,
in all correspondence.
Dated: September 21, 2011.
Laura Auletta,
Acting Director, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011–24906 Filed 9–27–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
Medicaid Program: Money Follows the
Person Rebalancing Demonstration
Program
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice creates an
expansion to an existing award under
the Money Follows the Person
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2011 / Notices
Demonstration grant. The program
supports the movement of Medicaid
beneficiaries with disabling and chronic
conditions from institutions into the
community. The award expands already
funded tasks related to quality technical
assistance provided to State grantees.
DATES: Effective Date: The program
expansion is effective on the date of
award (before September 30, 2011
through April 15, 2013).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anita Yuskauskas, (410) 786–0268.
Arun Natarajan, (410) 786–7455.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Background
The need for additional funds is the
result of an increase in the number of
Money Follows the Person (MFP) State
Grantees through the Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act (Affordable
Care Act) (Pub. L. 111–148, enacted on
March 23, 2010). Fifteen additional
States received new MFP funds in
January, 2011 under the Affordable Care
Act. The increase in the number of
States and programs resulting from the
Affordable Care Act place more demand
on the need for technical assistance to
States developing and implementing
quality improvement strategies,
particularly given the complexity and
vulnerability of the populations being
served in MFP and the Congress’
commitment to the Grant Program’s
success. The expansion was not
calculated in the original National
Quality Enterprise (NQE) budget
because at the time of the original
award, the Affordable Care Act money
was not included in CMS’ budget
allocation.
The additional resources are
necessary to assure the success of the
individual placements, specifically, by
facilitating sufficient quality
mechanisms to address the unique
needs of the populations with disabling
and chronic conditions. These are the
most vulnerable populations and a lack
of quality and oversight mechanisms in
place, may place individuals at risk.
II. Provisions of the Notice
We solicited a proposal from
Thomson Reuters Healthcare to expand
the National Home and CommunityBased Services (HCBS) Quality
Enterprise beyond the grant’s present
scope. The expansion was created by
section 2403 of the Affordable Care Act,
which amended section 6071 of the
Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, the
Money Follows the Person Rebalancing
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:20 Sep 27, 2011
Jkt 223001
Demonstration. The provision expanded
previous legislation to support State and
CMS efforts to improve quality in a
‘‘rebalanced’’ long-term support system,
and to demonstrate the ongoing benefits
from and need for an effective HCBS QI
Enterprise. The grant offered $1.2
million over 2 years through a program
expansion supplement.
We requested that the Thomson
Reuters Healthcare submit an
abbreviated application addressing the
expansion of the existing grant. The
Grantee provided an updated quality
technical assistance model and work
plan focused on the following four
major goals:
• Development of a process
demonstrating consistency between the
Grantee and CMS, and across all
Grantee staff and subcontractors for
providing technical assistance (Project
Management, 1.1).
• The provision of technical
assistance to states related to quality in
home and community-based services
programs (Technical Assistance, 2.1b).
• The provision of technical
assistance to CMS staff related to the
oversight of quality in HCBS programs
(Technical Assistance, 2.1c).
• The ongoing development and
maintenance of a national HCBS quality
web-based technical assistance site and
quality TA manuscripts (Technical
Assistance, 2.1d and e).
As part of the application, based on
the four major goals listed above, the
Grantee submitted a 3 page project
narrative describing the activities, and
an accompanying budget revision,
related to Grant #1LICMS030329/01,
entitled ‘‘The National HCBS Quality
Enterprise: Assisting States to Achieve
Enhanced Quality in a Rebalanced
Environment’’.
The documents included the
following:
• Cover Letter—The letter included
the current project director’s name and
a brief summary of the proposed project,
submitted and signed by the authorized
representative for this grant.
• SF–424a (Budget Information—Non
Construction Programs)—The applicant
provided the total costs for the
remainder of the project for $1.2
million, with a break out of those costs
in Section B ‘‘Budget Categories’’ of the
SF–424a form. The costs proposed were
for the additional costs only (not the
cumulative total costs of the entire
grant).
• Detailed Budget Narrative—The
applicant provided a detailed
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60051
breakdown of the aggregate numbers for
the budget recorded on the Standard
Form 424a ‘‘Budget Information—Non
Constructions Programs,’’ including
allocations for each major set of
activities or proposed tasks. The
proposed budget justification clearly
described each cost element in the
related budget category.
• Project Narrative—The project
narrative (approximately 3 pages in
length) provided a concise and complete
description of the proposed project. It
contained the information necessary for
CMS to fully understand the additional
work of the project. It covered all
aspects of the project requirements (see
criteria for writing the project
narrative—four major goals).
Authority: Section 6071 Deficit Reduction
Act of 2005.
Dated: September 20, 2011.
Daniel F. Kane,
Chief Grants Management Officer, Office of
Acquisition and Grants Management, Centers
for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2011–24986 Filed 9–27–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Proposed Information Collection
Activity; Comment Request
Proposed Projects
Title: State Council on Developmental
Disabilities Program Performance
Report.
OMB No.: 0980–0172.
Description: A Developmental
Disabilities Council Program
Performance Report is required by
federal statute. Each State
Developmental Disabilities Council
must submit an annual report for the
preceding fiscal year of activities and
accomplishments. Information provided
in the Program Performance Report will
be used (1) in the preparation of the
biennial Report to the President, the
Congress, and the National Council on
Disabilities and (2) to provide a national
perspective on program
accomplishments and continuing
challenges. This information will also
be used to comply with requirements in
the Government Performance and
Results Act of 1993.
Respondents: State Governments.
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60050-60051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24986]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Medicaid Program: Money Follows the Person Rebalancing
Demonstration Program
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice creates an expansion to an existing award under
the Money Follows the Person
[[Page 60051]]
Demonstration grant. The program supports the movement of Medicaid
beneficiaries with disabling and chronic conditions from institutions
into the community. The award expands already funded tasks related to
quality technical assistance provided to State grantees.
DATES: Effective Date: The program expansion is effective on the date
of award (before September 30, 2011 through April 15, 2013).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anita Yuskauskas, (410) 786-0268.
Arun Natarajan, (410) 786-7455.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The need for additional funds is the result of an increase in the
number of Money Follows the Person (MFP) State Grantees through the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Affordable Care Act) (Pub.
L. 111-148, enacted on March 23, 2010). Fifteen additional States
received new MFP funds in January, 2011 under the Affordable Care Act.
The increase in the number of States and programs resulting from the
Affordable Care Act place more demand on the need for technical
assistance to States developing and implementing quality improvement
strategies, particularly given the complexity and vulnerability of the
populations being served in MFP and the Congress' commitment to the
Grant Program's success. The expansion was not calculated in the
original National Quality Enterprise (NQE) budget because at the time
of the original award, the Affordable Care Act money was not included
in CMS' budget allocation.
The additional resources are necessary to assure the success of the
individual placements, specifically, by facilitating sufficient quality
mechanisms to address the unique needs of the populations with
disabling and chronic conditions. These are the most vulnerable
populations and a lack of quality and oversight mechanisms in place,
may place individuals at risk.
II. Provisions of the Notice
We solicited a proposal from Thomson Reuters Healthcare to expand
the National Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) Quality
Enterprise beyond the grant's present scope. The expansion was created
by section 2403 of the Affordable Care Act, which amended section 6071
of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, the Money Follows the Person
Rebalancing Demonstration. The provision expanded previous legislation
to support State and CMS efforts to improve quality in a ``rebalanced''
long-term support system, and to demonstrate the ongoing benefits from
and need for an effective HCBS QI Enterprise. The grant offered $1.2
million over 2 years through a program expansion supplement.
We requested that the Thomson Reuters Healthcare submit an
abbreviated application addressing the expansion of the existing grant.
The Grantee provided an updated quality technical assistance model and
work plan focused on the following four major goals:
Development of a process demonstrating consistency between
the Grantee and CMS, and across all Grantee staff and subcontractors
for providing technical assistance (Project Management, 1.1).
The provision of technical assistance to states related to
quality in home and community-based services programs (Technical
Assistance, 2.1b).
The provision of technical assistance to CMS staff related
to the oversight of quality in HCBS programs (Technical Assistance,
2.1c).
The ongoing development and maintenance of a national HCBS
quality web-based technical assistance site and quality TA manuscripts
(Technical Assistance, 2.1d and e).
As part of the application, based on the four major goals listed
above, the Grantee submitted a 3 page project narrative describing the
activities, and an accompanying budget revision, related to Grant
1LICMS030329/01, entitled ``The National HCBS Quality
Enterprise: Assisting States to Achieve Enhanced Quality in a
Rebalanced Environment''.
The documents included the following:
Cover Letter--The letter included the current project
director's name and a brief summary of the proposed project, submitted
and signed by the authorized representative for this grant.
SF-424a (Budget Information--Non Construction Programs)--
The applicant provided the total costs for the remainder of the project
for $1.2 million, with a break out of those costs in Section B ``Budget
Categories'' of the SF-424a form. The costs proposed were for the
additional costs only (not the cumulative total costs of the entire
grant).
Detailed Budget Narrative--The applicant provided a
detailed breakdown of the aggregate numbers for the budget recorded on
the Standard Form 424a ``Budget Information--Non Constructions
Programs,'' including allocations for each major set of activities or
proposed tasks. The proposed budget justification clearly described
each cost element in the related budget category.
Project Narrative--The project narrative (approximately 3
pages in length) provided a concise and complete description of the
proposed project. It contained the information necessary for CMS to
fully understand the additional work of the project. It covered all
aspects of the project requirements (see criteria for writing the
project narrative--four major goals).
Authority: Section 6071 Deficit Reduction Act of 2005.
Dated: September 20, 2011.
Daniel F. Kane,
Chief Grants Management Officer, Office of Acquisition and Grants
Management, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2011-24986 Filed 9-27-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P