Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 59590-59592 [2011-24748]
Download as PDF
59590
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 187
Tuesday, September 27, 2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0993; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–018–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 767–200
and –300 series airplanes. This
proposed AD would require repetitive
inspections for cracking of the aft
pressure bulkhead at station (STA)
1582, repair or replacement of any
cracked bulkhead, and eventual
replacement of the aft pressure
bulkhead at STA 1582 with a new
bulkhead. Accomplishing the
replacement would terminate the
repetitive inspections specified in this
proposed AD. This proposed AD was
prompted by reports of multiple site
damage cracks in the radial web lap and
tear strap splices of the aft pressure
bulkhead at STA 1582 due to fatigue.
We are proposing this AD to prevent
fatigue cracking of the aft pressure
bulkhead, which could result in rapid
decompression of the airplane and
possible damage or interference with the
airplane control systems that penetrate
the bulkhead, and consequent loss of
controllability of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by November 14,
2011.
mstockstill on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:38 Sep 26, 2011
Jkt 223001
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207;
telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1;
fax 206–766–5680; e-mail
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Berhane Alazar, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; phone (425)
917–6577; fax (425) 917–6590; e-mail:
berhane.alazar@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2011–0993; Directorate Identifier 2011–
NM–018–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We received reports of multiple site
damage (MSD) cracks in the radial web
lap and tear strap splices of the aft
pressure bulkhead at station (STA) 1582
due to fatigue. This cracking was found
on multiple airplanes with 31,746 to
36,597 total flight cycles. On four
airplanes, the crack findings revealed
MSD fatigue cracking common to the
radial web lap splices. Design changes
to improve the durability of the
bulkhead were made in production.
This condition, if not corrected, could
result in rapid decompression of the
airplane and possible damage or
interference with the airplane control
systems that penetrate the bulkhead,
and consequent loss of controllability of
the airplane.
Other Relevant Rulemaking
On February 25, 2004, we issued AD
2004–05–16, Amendment 39–13511 (69
FR 10917, March 9, 2004), for certain
Model 767–200 and –300 series
airplanes. That AD requires repetitive
inspections of the aft pressure bulkhead
web, and corrective action if necessary.
On January 31, 2005, we issued AD
2005–03–11, Amendment 39–13967 (70
FR 7174, February 11, 2005), corrected
on February 28, 2005 (70 FR 12119,
March 11, 2005), for certain Model 767
airplanes. That AD requires repetitive
detailed and eddy current inspections of
the aft pressure bulkhead for damage
and cracking, and repair if necessary.
That AD also requires one-time detailed
and high frequency eddy current
inspections of any ‘‘oil-can’’ located on
the aft pressure bulkhead, and related
corrective actions if necessary.
Since issuance of AD 2004–05–16,
Amendment 39–13511 (69 FR 10917,
March 9, 2004); and AD 2005–03–11,
Amendment 39–13967 (70 FR 12119,
March 11, 2005); the manufacturer has
developed design changes that improve
the durability of the bulkhead; therefore,
E:\FR\FM\27SEP1.SGM
27SEP1
59591
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 187 / Tuesday, September 27, 2011 / Proposed Rules
we have determined that further
rulemaking is necessary, and this
proposed AD follows from that
determination. Accomplishing the
inspections required by this AD
terminates the repetitive inspections
required by paragraph (b) of AD 2004–
05–16, and paragraph (f) of AD 2005–
03–11.
Relevant Service Information
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 767–53A0139, dated November
12, 2009. The service information
describes procedures for repetitive
detailed, low- and mid-frequency eddy
current inspections of the aft pressure
bulkhead at STA 1582 for cracks and
replacement or repair of any cracked
bulkhead found. The service
information also describes procedures
for eventual replacement of the aft
pressure bulkhead at STA 1582 with a
new bulkhead, which eliminates the
need for the repetitive inspections.
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type design.
grace period of 1,600 flight cycles for all
airplanes.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information described
previously, except as discussed under
‘‘Difference Between the Proposed AD
and Service Information.’’
Paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767–
53A0139, dated November 12, 2009,
specifies replacing the bulkhead at STA
1582 with a new bulkhead if any crack
is found during any inspection;
however, paragraph 3.B.2., of the
Accomplishment Instructions specifies
repairing or replacing the bulkhead at
STA 1582 if any crack is found. This
proposed AD requires either replacing
or repairing any cracked bulkhead and
doing the repetitive inspections if the
crack is repaired, until the replacement
required by paragraph (h) of this
proposed AD is done.
Difference Between the Proposed AD
Service Information
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767–
53A0139, dated November 12, 2009,
recommends accomplishing the
inspections within 1,600 flight cycles
after the most recent inspection done in
accordance with Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 767–53A0026, Revision 5,
dated January 29, 2004; however, it does
not include a grace period for airplanes
that might have exceeded that number
of flight cycles since accomplishing the
most recent inspection, or for airplanes
on which the inspections have not been
initiated. This proposed AD includes a
Clarification of Certain Requirements
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 83 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Inspections ..........................
22 work-hours × $85 per hour = $1,870 per inspection
cycle.
1,541 work-hours × $85 per hour = $130,985 ...............
Replacement .......................
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in subtitle VII,
part A, subpart III, section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Regulatory Findings
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Authority for This Rulemaking
mstockstill on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Parts cost
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:38 Sep 26, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Cost per product
Cost on U.S.
operators
0
$1,870
$155,210
$399,539
530,524
44,033,492
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA–
2011–0993; Directorate Identifier 2011–
NM–018–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by
November 14, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) Certain requirements of this AD affect
certain requirements of AD 2004–05–16,
Amendment 39–13511 (69 FR 10917, March
9, 2004); and AD 2005–03–11, Amendment
39–13967 (70 FR 7174, February 11, 2005),
E:\FR\FM\27SEP1.SGM
27SEP1
59592
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 187 / Tuesday, September 27, 2011 / Proposed Rules
corrected on February 28, 2005 (70 FR 12119,
March 11, 2005).
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to The Boeing
Company Model 767–200 and -300 series
airplanes, certificated in any category, as
identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
767–53A0139, dated November 12, 2009.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
Subject
(d) Joint Aircraft System Component
(JASC)/Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 53: Fuselage.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD was prompted by reports of
multiple site damage cracks in the radial web
lap and tear strap splices of the aft pressure
bulkhead at station (STA) 1582 due to
fatigue. We are issuing this AD to prevent
fatigue cracking of the aft pressure bulkhead,
which could result in rapid decompression of
the airplane and possible damage or
interference with the airplane control
systems that penetrate the bulkhead, and
consequent loss of controllability of the
airplane.
Compliance
(f) Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
mstockstill on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Repetitive Inspections
(g) Except as provided by paragraph (h) of
this AD: Before the accumulation of 43,000
total flight cycles, or within 1,600 flight
cycles after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later, do detailed, lowfrequency eddy current, and mid-frequency
eddy current inspections for cracking of the
aft pressure bulkhead at STA 1582, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
767–53A0139, dated November 12, 2009. If
any crack is found, before further flight,
replace the bulkhead as required by
paragraph (h) of this AD, or repair the crack
in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
767–53A0139, dated November 12, 2009, and
repeat the inspections thereafter at intervals
not to exceed 1,600 flight cycles. If no crack
is found, repeat the inspections thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 1,600 flight cycles.
Accomplishing the inspections required by
this paragraph terminates the repetitive
inspections required by paragraph (b) of AD
2004–05–16, Amendment 39–13511 (69 FR
10917, March 9, 2004); and paragraph (f) of
AD 2005–03–11, Amendment 39–13967 (70
FR 7174, February 11, 2005), corrected on
February 28, 2005 (70 FR 12119, March 11,
2005).
Replacement
(h) Except as provided by paragraph (g) of
this AD: Before the accumulation of 43,000
total flight cycles, or within 5,000 flight
cycles after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later: Replace the aft
pressure bulkhead at STA 1582 with a new
bulkhead, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 767–53A0139, dated
November 12, 2009. Accomplishing the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:38 Sep 26, 2011
Jkt 223001
replacement in this paragraph terminates the
repetitive inspections required by paragraph
(g) of this AD.
(i)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the
Related Information section of this AD.
Information may be e-mailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO
to make those findings. For a repair method
to be approved, the repair must meet the
certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
Related Information
(j) For more information about this AD,
contact Berhane Alazar, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356; phone (425) 917–6577; fax (425) 917–
6590; e-mail: berhane.alazar@faa.gov.
(k) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206–
544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680;
e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356. For information on
the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 7, 2011.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–24748 Filed 9–26–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
17 CFR Parts 400, 401, 402, 403, 405,
and 420
[Docket No. BPD GSRS 11–01]
RIN 1535–AA02
Government Securities Act
Regulations; Replacement of
References to Credit Ratings and
Technical Amendments
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Financial Markets,
Treasury.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of the
Treasury (‘‘Treasury’’ or ‘‘We’’) is
issuing this proposed rule to solicit
public comment on a proposed
amendment to the regulations issued
under the Government Securities Act of
1986, as amended (‘‘GSA’’), to replace
references to credit ratings in our rules
with alternative requirements. Section
939A of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act of
2010 requires Federal agencies to
remove from their applicable
regulations any reference to or
requirement of reliance on credit ratings
and to substitute a standard of
creditworthiness as the agency
determines appropriate for such
regulations. In this release Treasury is
requesting comment on a substitute
standard of creditworthiness for use in
the liquid capital rule required by GSA
regulations. Separately, we are
proposing in this release several nonsubstantive, technical amendments to
Treasury’s GSA regulations to update
certain information or to delete certain
requirements that are no longer
applicable.
SUMMARY:
Submit comments on or before
November 28, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
DATES:
Electronic Comments
Use the Federal eRulemaking Portal
(https://www.regulations.gov) and follow
the instructions for submitting
comments through the Web site. You
may download this proposed
amendment from https://
www.regulations.gov or the Bureau of
the Public Debt’s Web site at https://
www.treasurydirect.gov.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments to Bureau of
the Public Debt, Government Securities
Regulations Staff, 799 9th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20239–0001.
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\27SEP1.SGM
27SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 27, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 59590-59592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24748]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 187 / Tuesday, September 27, 2011 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 59590]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2011-0993; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-018-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain The Boeing Company Model 767-200 and -300 series airplanes.
This proposed AD would require repetitive inspections for cracking of
the aft pressure bulkhead at station (STA) 1582, repair or replacement
of any cracked bulkhead, and eventual replacement of the aft pressure
bulkhead at STA 1582 with a new bulkhead. Accomplishing the replacement
would terminate the repetitive inspections specified in this proposed
AD. This proposed AD was prompted by reports of multiple site damage
cracks in the radial web lap and tear strap splices of the aft pressure
bulkhead at STA 1582 due to fatigue. We are proposing this AD to
prevent fatigue cracking of the aft pressure bulkhead, which could
result in rapid decompression of the airplane and possible damage or
interference with the airplane control systems that penetrate the
bulkhead, and consequent loss of controllability of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 14,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Berhane Alazar, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; phone (425) 917-
6577; fax (425) 917-6590; e-mail: berhane.alazar@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-0993;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-018-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We received reports of multiple site damage (MSD) cracks in the
radial web lap and tear strap splices of the aft pressure bulkhead at
station (STA) 1582 due to fatigue. This cracking was found on multiple
airplanes with 31,746 to 36,597 total flight cycles. On four airplanes,
the crack findings revealed MSD fatigue cracking common to the radial
web lap splices. Design changes to improve the durability of the
bulkhead were made in production. This condition, if not corrected,
could result in rapid decompression of the airplane and possible damage
or interference with the airplane control systems that penetrate the
bulkhead, and consequent loss of controllability of the airplane.
Other Relevant Rulemaking
On February 25, 2004, we issued AD 2004-05-16, Amendment 39-13511
(69 FR 10917, March 9, 2004), for certain Model 767-200 and -300 series
airplanes. That AD requires repetitive inspections of the aft pressure
bulkhead web, and corrective action if necessary.
On January 31, 2005, we issued AD 2005-03-11, Amendment 39-13967
(70 FR 7174, February 11, 2005), corrected on February 28, 2005 (70 FR
12119, March 11, 2005), for certain Model 767 airplanes. That AD
requires repetitive detailed and eddy current inspections of the aft
pressure bulkhead for damage and cracking, and repair if necessary.
That AD also requires one-time detailed and high frequency eddy current
inspections of any ``oil-can'' located on the aft pressure bulkhead,
and related corrective actions if necessary.
Since issuance of AD 2004-05-16, Amendment 39-13511 (69 FR 10917,
March 9, 2004); and AD 2005-03-11, Amendment 39-13967 (70 FR 12119,
March 11, 2005); the manufacturer has developed design changes that
improve the durability of the bulkhead; therefore,
[[Page 59591]]
we have determined that further rulemaking is necessary, and this
proposed AD follows from that determination. Accomplishing the
inspections required by this AD terminates the repetitive inspections
required by paragraph (b) of AD 2004-05-16, and paragraph (f) of AD
2005-03-11.
Relevant Service Information
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-53A0139, dated
November 12, 2009. The service information describes procedures for
repetitive detailed, low- and mid-frequency eddy current inspections of
the aft pressure bulkhead at STA 1582 for cracks and replacement or
repair of any cracked bulkhead found. The service information also
describes procedures for eventual replacement of the aft pressure
bulkhead at STA 1582 with a new bulkhead, which eliminates the need for
the repetitive inspections.
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information described previously, except as discussed
under ``Difference Between the Proposed AD and Service Information.''
Difference Between the Proposed AD Service Information
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-53A0139, dated November 12, 2009,
recommends accomplishing the inspections within 1,600 flight cycles
after the most recent inspection done in accordance with Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 767-53A0026, Revision 5, dated January 29, 2004;
however, it does not include a grace period for airplanes that might
have exceeded that number of flight cycles since accomplishing the most
recent inspection, or for airplanes on which the inspections have not
been initiated. This proposed AD includes a grace period of 1,600
flight cycles for all airplanes.
Clarification of Certain Requirements
Paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
767-53A0139, dated November 12, 2009, specifies replacing the bulkhead
at STA 1582 with a new bulkhead if any crack is found during any
inspection; however, paragraph 3.B.2., of the Accomplishment
Instructions specifies repairing or replacing the bulkhead at STA 1582
if any crack is found. This proposed AD requires either replacing or
repairing any cracked bulkhead and doing the repetitive inspections if
the crack is repaired, until the replacement required by paragraph (h)
of this proposed AD is done.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 83 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspections..................... 22 work-hours x $85 per 0 $1,870 $155,210
hour = $1,870 per
inspection cycle.
Replacement..................... 1,541 work-hours x $85 $399,539 530,524 44,033,492
per hour = $130,985.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2011-0993; Directorate Identifier
2011-NM-018-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by November 14, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) Certain requirements of this AD affect certain requirements
of AD 2004-05-16, Amendment 39-13511 (69 FR 10917, March 9, 2004);
and AD 2005-03-11, Amendment 39-13967 (70 FR 7174, February 11,
2005),
[[Page 59592]]
corrected on February 28, 2005 (70 FR 12119, March 11, 2005).
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 767-200 and -300
series airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-53A0139, dated November 12, 2009.
Subject
(d) Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport
Association (ATA) of America Code 53: Fuselage.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD was prompted by reports of multiple site damage
cracks in the radial web lap and tear strap splices of the aft
pressure bulkhead at station (STA) 1582 due to fatigue. We are
issuing this AD to prevent fatigue cracking of the aft pressure
bulkhead, which could result in rapid decompression of the airplane
and possible damage or interference with the airplane control
systems that penetrate the bulkhead, and consequent loss of
controllability of the airplane.
Compliance
(f) Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
Repetitive Inspections
(g) Except as provided by paragraph (h) of this AD: Before the
accumulation of 43,000 total flight cycles, or within 1,600 flight
cycles after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later,
do detailed, low-frequency eddy current, and mid-frequency eddy
current inspections for cracking of the aft pressure bulkhead at STA
1582, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 767-53A0139, dated November 12, 2009. If any
crack is found, before further flight, replace the bulkhead as
required by paragraph (h) of this AD, or repair the crack in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 767-53A0139, dated November 12, 2009, and repeat
the inspections thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,600 flight
cycles. If no crack is found, repeat the inspections thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 1,600 flight cycles. Accomplishing the
inspections required by this paragraph terminates the repetitive
inspections required by paragraph (b) of AD 2004-05-16, Amendment
39-13511 (69 FR 10917, March 9, 2004); and paragraph (f) of AD 2005-
03-11, Amendment 39-13967 (70 FR 7174, February 11, 2005), corrected
on February 28, 2005 (70 FR 12119, March 11, 2005).
Replacement
(h) Except as provided by paragraph (g) of this AD: Before the
accumulation of 43,000 total flight cycles, or within 5,000 flight
cycles after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later:
Replace the aft pressure bulkhead at STA 1582 with a new bulkhead,
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 767-53A0139, dated November 12, 2009. Accomplishing
the replacement in this paragraph terminates the repetitive
inspections required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(i)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the Related Information
section of this AD. Information may be e-mailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO to make
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
Related Information
(j) For more information about this AD, contact Berhane Alazar,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington
98057-3356; phone (425) 917-6577; fax (425) 917-6590; e-mail:
berhane.alazar@faa.gov.
(k) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 7, 2011.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-24748 Filed 9-26-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P