Statement of Organizations, Functions, and Delegations of Authority, 59408-59410 [2011-24583]
Download as PDF
59408
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 186 / Monday, September 26, 2011 / Notices
(HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Paul
E. Levine, Jr., Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research (HFM–17),
Food and Drug Administration, 1401
Rockville Pike, suite 200N, Rockville,
MD 20852–1448, 301–827–6210.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
FDA is announcing the availability of
its report of scientific and medical
literature and information concerning
the use of non-standardized allergenic
extracts in the diagnosis and treatment
of allergic disease. FDA is making this
report available to provide information
and obtain comment on the report from
public and private stakeholders. FDA
will also seek input on the report from
APAC at a meeting to be held on
October 25, 2011. A separate notice of
the APAC meeting is published
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register. This process will assist FDA in
its continued oversight of regulated
products.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Discussion
In 2004, FDA formed an internal
committee to review available scientific
and medical data on the safety and
effectiveness of non-standardized
allergenic extracts. FDA formed this
committee to consider the previous
evaluations performed by the external
allergenics advisory review panels
under 21 CFR 601.25 (Panel I or
‘‘Original Panel’’) and under 21 CFR
601.26 (Panel II or ‘‘Reclassification
Panel’’). Reports of the Original and
Reclassification Panels are available at
https://www.fda.gov/
BiologicsBloodVaccines/Allergenics/
ucm272115.htm. The internal
committee designed a data file to use in
its review and to archive supporting
data. The data file includes a report of
information for each product, including
a discussion of each product reviewed,
and a list of reviewed literature
associated with each product. FDA’s
approach to creating this data file was
presented to APAC on April 7, 2005,
and discussed again at the APAC
meeting on September 13, 2006.
After receiving favorable feedback
from the APAC on FDA’s proposed
methodology, FDA proceeded to collect
the following information in order to
facilitate its assessment of safety and
effectiveness of non-standardized
allergenic products.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:37 Sep 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
A. Literature Reviewed by the
Allergenics Advisory Review Panels
This includes literature reviewed by
the Original Panel as part of its final
report in 1981 and literature reviewed
by the Reclassification Panel as part of
its final report in 1983.
B. Data Concerning the Effectiveness
and Safety of Non-Standardized
Allergenic Products That Have Become
Available Since 1972
This includes published literature,
available manufacturer data, and data
from other external sources. FDA
accumulated these data from the
following sources:
1. Published Literature From 1972 to the
Present
This literature was acquired by
searching for articles using a PubMed
and/or Institute for Scientific
Information (ISI) search engine (Englishlanguage literature articles only).
2. Publicly Available Manufacturer Data
These data were obtained by
reviewing information published in the
literature.
3. Medwatch Data Collected for Years
1987 to 2010
These data were evaluated for safety
related product trends.
4. Data From Other External Sources
These data were obtained by
performing a broad Internet search (e.g.,
Google) to check for any additional
safety or effectiveness data not captured
in published articles found via PubMed
or ISI.
FDA collected information from
published scientific and medical
literature and other data sources for
each extract in order to identify those
studies that used acceptable alternative
testing methods. FDA also collected
information from studies that:
• Provided identifiable, specific and
valid nomenclature for the source
materials used in the preparation of the
allergenic extracts in the studies.
• Were performed using aqueous
based extracts prepared from
specifically identified source materials
with correct nomenclature.
• Described identifiable, specific, and
valid study methods.
• Provided objective and evaluable
data.
• For skin test data in the studies:
Obtained positive skin tests in index
cases by either skin prick or intradermal
methods, demonstrated by:
Æ Wheal or erythema;
Æ Where appropriate, comparison to
positive and negative control data in
same study subjects.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• For studies with cross reactivity
data, demonstrated cross reactivity by:
Æ ELISA or RAST inhibition;
Æ Western immunoblot; or
Æ Other valid immunochemical data.
In reviewing evidence of efficacy,
FDA did not consider to be adequate
‘‘random experience,’’ or reports that
lacked sufficient scientific detail for
proper evaluation (such as imprecise
nomenclature). FDA also did not
consider to be adequate ‘‘isolated case
reports’’ unless corroborated by the
following: (1) Other case reports from
independent authors, (2) well-described
allergen challenge data, or (3) valid
cross-reactivity data.
FDA is providing its report of the
collected literature and other data in a
data file that is currently available in
PDF format on FDA’s Web site at
https://www.fda.gov/downloads/
BiologicsBloodVaccines/Allergenics/
UCM271330.pdf. FDA welcomes
comments on the scientific and medical
literature and information presented in
the data file.
III. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written
comments regarding this document. It is
only necessary to send one set of
comments. It is no longer necessary to
send two copies of mailed comments.
Identify comments with the docket
number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
IV. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the data file at https://
www.fda.gov/downloads/
BiologicsBloodVaccines/Allergenics/
UCM271330.pdf or https://
www.regulations.gov.
Dated: September 20, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011–24598 Filed 9–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0013]
Statement of Organizations, Functions,
and Delegations of Authority
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM
26SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 186 / Monday, September 26, 2011 / Notices
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that it has reorganized the Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)
by establishing two offices and their
substructures under the Office of
Medical Policy: Office of Prescription
Drug Promotion (OPDP) and Office of
Medical Policy Initiatives (OMPI). OPDP
will consist of the Division of Direct-toConsumer Promotion and the Division
of Professional Promotion. OMPI will
consist of the Division of Medical Policy
Development and Division of Medical
Policy Programs.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen Koenick, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research (HFD–063),
Food and Drug Administration, 11919
Rockville Pike, rm. 324, Rockville, MD
20852, 301–796–4422.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Introduction
The Statement of Organization,
Functions, and Delegations of Authority
for CDER (35 FR 3685, February 25,
1970; 60 FR 56605, November 9, 1995;
64 FR 36361, July 6, 1999; 72 FR 50112,
August 30, 2007; 76 FR 19376, April 7,
2011; and 76 FR 51039, August 17,
2011) is amended to reflect the
restructuring of CDER that was
approved by the Secretary of Health and
Human Services on May 25, 2011, as
follows:
II. Organization
CDER is headed by the Director and
includes the following organizational
units:
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Office of Medical Policy
1. Provides Center oversight and
leadership in the development of
medical policy procedures and policy
initiatives pertaining to drug
development, drug approval,
bioresearch monitoring, human subject
protection, and postmarket surveillance.
2. Provides scientific and regulatory
leadership in ensuring accurate and
effective communication of medical
information to health care professionals
and patients and compliance with
applicable regulations.
3. Fosters an interdisciplinary
approach to medical policy
development, implementation, and
coordination through collaboration with
other disciplines, program areas, and
FDA Centers in a manner that enhances
integration of evolving science and
policy into drug development,
regulatory review, and postmarket
surveillance processes.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:37 Sep 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
Office of Prescription Drug Promotion
1. Formulates and establishes policy
for the regulation of prescription drug
promotion, including advertisements
and promotion labeling, and other
promotional activities.
2. Plans and supervises research
studies to evaluate the impact of health
communication and prescription drug
promotion directed to health care
professionals and consumers.
Division of Direct-To-Consumer
Promotion
1. Reviews draft Direct-to-Consumer
Promotion (DTCP) promotional
materials and provides detailed written
advisory comments to industry
sponsors. Examples of draft materials
include television ads, magazine ads,
Internet Web sites, and patient
brochures.
2. Develops and issues enforcement
actions against false and misleading
DTCP materials and activities for
prescription drugs.
3. Reviews draft patient labeling for
inappropriate promotional content.
Division of Professional Promotion
1. Reviews draft promotional
materials directed to health care
professionals and provides detailed
written advisory comments to industry
sponsors. Examples of draft materials
include journal ads, Internet Web sites,
commercial exhibit hall materials, sales
aids, and broadcast advertisements.
2. Develops and issues enforcement
actions against false and misleading
prescription drug promotional materials
and activities directed to health care
professionals.
3. Reviews draft professional labeling
for inappropriate promotional content.
Office of Medical Policy Initiatives
1. Provides oversight and direction for
development of medical policies and
procedures pertaining to drug
development and drug approval and
postmarket surveillance processes.
2. Provides oversight and direction for
new and ongoing policy initiatives in
broad-based medical and clinical policy
areas, including initiatives to develop
active safety monitoring of marketed
products, improve the science and
efficiency of clinical trials, regulate
biosimilars (or follow-on biologics), and
enhance consumer-directed drug
information.
Division of Medical Policy Development
1. Responsible for the development of
medical policy pertaining to drug
development, drug approval,
bioresearch monitoring, human subject
protection, and postmarket surveillance
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
59409
processes in collaboration with
appropriate program areas and
coordinating committees. Develops
issue papers, guidances, regulations,
and operating procedures.
2. Provides advice and assistance to
FDA staff and external constituents
concerning implementation or
application of new and existing medical
policies and procedures.
3. Collaborates with the Office of
Regulatory Policy to ensure timely and
efficient clearance and dissemination of
new and revised policy documents.
Division of Medical Policy Programs
1. Implements the Sentinel Initiative,
an innovative safety monitoring
program for marketed medical products
that employs active surveillance of
automated health care databases.
2. Coordinates with FDA Centers,
external partners, and stakeholders to
ensure efficient implementation of
quality science and technology, and
effective privacy and security strategies.
3. Manages and coordinates policy
development related to biosimilars
legislation and resulting programs.
4. Manages and coordinates clinical
trial modernization policy and
programs, including coordinating
public-private partnerships dedicated to
removing barriers to clinical trials
participation, enhancing evidence
derived from clinical trials, and
optimizing the use of clinical trial
resources.
5. Manages and coordinates policy
and program initiatives to improve
quality and utility, and broaden
dissemination, of consumer-directed
medical information.
6. Manages and coordinates efforts to
ensure that professional labeling is
compliant with applicable regulations
and is optimized as a tool for
communicating about the safety and
efficacy of drugs.
7. Coordinates and collaborates with
relevant program areas to ensure
optimal FDA scientific and technical
input for ongoing policy initiatives.
8. Develops and manages new science
and technology policy initiatives
pertaining to drug development, drug
approval, and postmarket surveillance
processes.
III. Delegation of Authority
Pending further delegation, directives
or orders by the Commissioner of Food
and Drugs, all delegations and
redelegations of authority made to
officials and employees of affected
organizational components will
continue in them or their successors
pending further redelegations, provided
E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM
26SEN1
59410
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 186 / Monday, September 26, 2011 / Notices
Reports Clearance Officer at (301) 443–
1129.
Comments are invited on: (a) The
proposed collection of information for
the proper performance of the functions
of the Agency; (b) the accuracy of the
Agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
they are consistent with this
reorganization.
Dated: September 20, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011–24583 Filed 9–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services
Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection:
Comment Request
In compliance with the requirement
for opportunity for public comment on
proposed data collection projects
(section 3506(c)(2)(A) of Title 44, United
States Code, as amended by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13), the Health
Resources and Services Administration
(HRSA) publishes periodic summaries
of proposed projects being developed
for submission to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
To request more information on the
proposed project or to obtain a copy of
the data collection plans and draft
instruments, e-mail
paperwork@hrsa.gov or call the HRSA
Proposed Project: Cultural and
Linguistic Competency and Health
Literacy Data Collection Checklist
(OMB No. 0915–xxxx)—[New]
The vision of the Health Resources
and Services Administration (HRSA) is
‘‘Healthy Communities, Healthy
People.’’ In addition, the HRSA mission
statement is ‘‘To improve health and
achieve health equity through access to
quality services, a skilled health
workforce and innovative programs.’’
This is the framework that supports a
health care system that assures access to
comprehensive, culturally competent,
quality care.
Performance measures have been
helpful for HRSA to assess the progress
of each grantee. The measure used will
be the degree to which HRSA-funded
Number of
respondents
Instrument
Responses
per
respondent
programs have incorporated cultural
and linguistic competence and health
literacy elements into their policies,
guidelines, contracts and training.
HRSA Bureaus/Offices shall be
encouraged to incorporate this
performance measure or a modified
version of this measure into their
funding opportunity announcements
either as a stand-alone or integrated
measure.
Using a scale of 0–3, the grantee may
use the Cultural and Linguistic
Competency and Health Literacy Data
Collection Checklist to assess if
specified cultural/linguistic competence
and health literacy elements have been
incorporated into their policies,
guidelines, contracts and training. Each
HRSA program may add data sources
and year of data used for scoring to
provide a rationale for determining a
score, and/or applicability of elements
to a specific program.
The goal of this checklist is to
increase the number of HRSA-funded
programs that have integrated both
cultural and linguistic competence, as
well as health literacy, into their
policies, guidelines, contracts and
training. In addition, variations of the
proposed tool have proven useful for
grantees’ self-assessment. This proposed
tool can also offer insights into technical
assistance challenges and opportunities.
The annual estimate of burden is as
follows:
Total
responses
Hours per
response
Total burden
hours
Data Collection Checklist .....................................................
900
1
900
1
900
Total ..............................................................................
900
1
900
1
900
E-mail comments to
paperwork@hrsa.gov or mail the HRSA
Reports Clearance Officer, Room 10–33,
Parklawn Building, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857. Written comments
should be received within 60 days of
this notice.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Dated: September 20, 2011.
Reva Harris,
Acting Director, Division of Policy
Information and Coordination.
AGENCY:
[FR Doc. 2011–24561 Filed 9–23–11; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:37 Sep 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
National Institutes of Health
Government-Owned Inventions;
Availability for Licensing
National Institutes of Health,
Public Health Service, HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The inventions listed below
are owned by an agency of the U.S.
Government and are available for
licensing in the U.S. in accordance with
35 U.S.C. 207 to achieve expeditious
commercialization of results of
federally-funded research and
development. Foreign patent
applications are filed on selected
inventions to extend market coverage
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
for companies and may also be available
for licensing.
ADDRESSES: Licensing information and
copies of the U.S. patent applications
listed below may be obtained by writing
to the indicated licensing contact at the
Office of Technology Transfer, National
Institutes of Health, 6011 Executive
Boulevard, Suite 325, Rockville,
Maryland 20852–3804; telephone: 301–
496–7057; fax: 301–402–0220. A signed
Confidential Disclosure Agreement will
be required to receive copies of the
patent applications.
A Novel Method To Predict Kidney
Tumor Growth
Description of Technology: The
invention pertains to a computerized
method of predicting kidney tumor
growth for early stage treatment
planning. The method utilizes a finite
E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM
26SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 186 (Monday, September 26, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59408-59410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24583]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0013]
Statement of Organizations, Functions, and Delegations of
Authority
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
[[Page 59409]]
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that it
has reorganized the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) by
establishing two offices and their substructures under the Office of
Medical Policy: Office of Prescription Drug Promotion (OPDP) and Office
of Medical Policy Initiatives (OMPI). OPDP will consist of the Division
of Direct-to-Consumer Promotion and the Division of Professional
Promotion. OMPI will consist of the Division of Medical Policy
Development and Division of Medical Policy Programs.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Koenick, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research (HFD-063), Food and Drug Administration, 11919
Rockville Pike, rm. 324, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-796-4422.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of
Authority for CDER (35 FR 3685, February 25, 1970; 60 FR 56605,
November 9, 1995; 64 FR 36361, July 6, 1999; 72 FR 50112, August 30,
2007; 76 FR 19376, April 7, 2011; and 76 FR 51039, August 17, 2011) is
amended to reflect the restructuring of CDER that was approved by the
Secretary of Health and Human Services on May 25, 2011, as follows:
II. Organization
CDER is headed by the Director and includes the following
organizational units:
Office of Medical Policy
1. Provides Center oversight and leadership in the development of
medical policy procedures and policy initiatives pertaining to drug
development, drug approval, bioresearch monitoring, human subject
protection, and postmarket surveillance.
2. Provides scientific and regulatory leadership in ensuring
accurate and effective communication of medical information to health
care professionals and patients and compliance with applicable
regulations.
3. Fosters an interdisciplinary approach to medical policy
development, implementation, and coordination through collaboration
with other disciplines, program areas, and FDA Centers in a manner that
enhances integration of evolving science and policy into drug
development, regulatory review, and postmarket surveillance processes.
Office of Prescription Drug Promotion
1. Formulates and establishes policy for the regulation of
prescription drug promotion, including advertisements and promotion
labeling, and other promotional activities.
2. Plans and supervises research studies to evaluate the impact of
health communication and prescription drug promotion directed to health
care professionals and consumers.
Division of Direct-To-Consumer Promotion
1. Reviews draft Direct-to-Consumer Promotion (DTCP) promotional
materials and provides detailed written advisory comments to industry
sponsors. Examples of draft materials include television ads, magazine
ads, Internet Web sites, and patient brochures.
2. Develops and issues enforcement actions against false and
misleading DTCP materials and activities for prescription drugs.
3. Reviews draft patient labeling for inappropriate promotional
content.
Division of Professional Promotion
1. Reviews draft promotional materials directed to health care
professionals and provides detailed written advisory comments to
industry sponsors. Examples of draft materials include journal ads,
Internet Web sites, commercial exhibit hall materials, sales aids, and
broadcast advertisements.
2. Develops and issues enforcement actions against false and
misleading prescription drug promotional materials and activities
directed to health care professionals.
3. Reviews draft professional labeling for inappropriate
promotional content.
Office of Medical Policy Initiatives
1. Provides oversight and direction for development of medical
policies and procedures pertaining to drug development and drug
approval and postmarket surveillance processes.
2. Provides oversight and direction for new and ongoing policy
initiatives in broad-based medical and clinical policy areas, including
initiatives to develop active safety monitoring of marketed products,
improve the science and efficiency of clinical trials, regulate
biosimilars (or follow-on biologics), and enhance consumer-directed
drug information.
Division of Medical Policy Development
1. Responsible for the development of medical policy pertaining to
drug development, drug approval, bioresearch monitoring, human subject
protection, and postmarket surveillance processes in collaboration with
appropriate program areas and coordinating committees. Develops issue
papers, guidances, regulations, and operating procedures.
2. Provides advice and assistance to FDA staff and external
constituents concerning implementation or application of new and
existing medical policies and procedures.
3. Collaborates with the Office of Regulatory Policy to ensure
timely and efficient clearance and dissemination of new and revised
policy documents.
Division of Medical Policy Programs
1. Implements the Sentinel Initiative, an innovative safety
monitoring program for marketed medical products that employs active
surveillance of automated health care databases.
2. Coordinates with FDA Centers, external partners, and
stakeholders to ensure efficient implementation of quality science and
technology, and effective privacy and security strategies.
3. Manages and coordinates policy development related to
biosimilars legislation and resulting programs.
4. Manages and coordinates clinical trial modernization policy and
programs, including coordinating public-private partnerships dedicated
to removing barriers to clinical trials participation, enhancing
evidence derived from clinical trials, and optimizing the use of
clinical trial resources.
5. Manages and coordinates policy and program initiatives to
improve quality and utility, and broaden dissemination, of consumer-
directed medical information.
6. Manages and coordinates efforts to ensure that professional
labeling is compliant with applicable regulations and is optimized as a
tool for communicating about the safety and efficacy of drugs.
7. Coordinates and collaborates with relevant program areas to
ensure optimal FDA scientific and technical input for ongoing policy
initiatives.
8. Develops and manages new science and technology policy
initiatives pertaining to drug development, drug approval, and
postmarket surveillance processes.
III. Delegation of Authority
Pending further delegation, directives or orders by the
Commissioner of Food and Drugs, all delegations and redelegations of
authority made to officials and employees of affected organizational
components will continue in them or their successors pending further
redelegations, provided
[[Page 59410]]
they are consistent with this reorganization.
Dated: September 20, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-24583 Filed 9-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P