Notice of Availability of the Proposed Ironwood Forest National Monument Resource Management Plan/Final EIS, 59156-59157 [2011-24340]
Download as PDF
59156
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 185 / Friday, September 23, 2011 / Notices
which would occur if formally
designated are listed below:
Alternatives and Acres
Proposed ACEC
Limitations
A
B
C
D
Cedar Canyon .....................................
Johnson Canyon .................................
708
1,800
0
0
708
1,800
0
1,800
Kuchamaa ...........................................
Million Dollar Spring ............................
Potrero ................................................
803
6,265
2,966
0
0
0
803
6,265
0
0
0
0
Santa Ana River Wash .......................
Santa Margarita River .........................
Upper Santa Clara River ....................
750
1,247
0
750
4,474
1,620
750
1,247
0
750
4,474
1,620
Western Riverside County ..................
Oak Mountain .....................................
Gavilan ................................................
Badlands .............................................
Beauty Mountain .................................
Otay/Kuchamaa ..................................
0
0
0
0
0
0
24,995
0
0
0
27,376
8,291
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
894
3,822
1,051
3,925
8,291
Total acres ..........................................
14,539
67,506
11,573
26,627
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
A Record of Decision for the proposed
RMP will be prepared following
publication of the Proposed RMP/Final
EIS in accordance with the planning
regulations at 43 CFR 1610.5–1 and the
NEPA, 40 CFR 1505.2.
Please note that public comments and
information submitted including names,
street addresses, and e-mail addresses of
respondents will be available for public
review and disclosure at the above
address during regular business hours (8
a.m. to 4 p.m.), Monday through Friday,
except holidays.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
John R. Kalish,
Manager, Palm Springs-South Coast Field
Office.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6 and 1506.10; 43
CFR 1610.2.
[FR Doc. 2011–24493 Filed 9–22–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–40–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:41 Sep 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
ACECs are:
Closed to OHV use or limited to designated roads and
trails under all alternatives.
Avoidance areas for land use authorizations under Alternatives A, C, and D. ACECs are exclusion areas
under Alternative B.
Closed to fluid mineral and geothermal leasing and
sale of mineral materials under Alternatives A, C,
and D. The Western Riverside County ACEC would
be considered for sale of mineral materials on a
case-by-case basis with site specific analysis required to protect ACEC values of relevance and importance.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLAZG03000.L16100000.DQ0000.
LXSS085A0000.241A.00]
Notice of Availability of the Proposed
Ironwood Forest National Monument
Resource Management Plan/Final EIS
Bureau of Land Management.
Notice of Availability.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended, and the Federal Land
Policy and Management Act of 1976, as
amended, the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) has prepared a
Proposed Resource Management Plan
(RMP)/Final Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for the Ironwood Forest
National Monument and by this notice
is announcing its availability.
DATES: BLM planning regulations state
that any person who meets the
conditions as described in the
regulations may protest the BLM’s
Proposed RMP/Final EIS. The protest
must be filed within 30 days of the date
that the Environmental Protection
Agency publishes this notice in the
Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Ironwood
Forest National Monument Proposed
RMP/Final EIS have been sent to
affected Federal, State, and local
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
government agencies; the Ak Chin
Indian Community, Gila River Indian
Community, Tohono O’odham Nation,
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian
Community, and San Carlos Apache
Indian Community; and to other
stakeholders. Copies of the Proposed
RMP/Final EIS are available for public
inspection at the BLM Tucson Field
Office, 12661 East Broadway Boulevard,
Tucson, Arizona. Interested persons
may also review the Proposed RMP/
Final EIS on the Internet at https://
www.blm.gov/az/st/en/prog/planning/
ironwood.html. All protests must be in
writing and mailed to the following
addresses:
Regular Mail:
BLM Director (210), Attention: Brenda
Hudgens-Williams, P.O. Box 71383,
Washington, DC 20024–1383
Overnight Mail:
BLM Director (210), Attention: Brenda
Hudgens-Williams, 20 M. Street,
SE., Room 2134LM, Washington,
DC 20003.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura Olais, Ironwood Forest National
Monument Manager, Tucson Field
Office, 12661 East Broadway, Tucson,
Arizona 85748–7208; or by telephone at
520–258–7235; or by e-mail at
lolais@blm.gov. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
to contact the above individual during
E:\FR\FM\23SEN1.SGM
23SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 185 / Friday, September 23, 2011 / Notices
normal business hours. The FIRS is
available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week,
to leave a message or question with the
above individual. You will receive a
reply during normal business hours.
The
Ironwood Forest National Monument,
established by Presidential
Proclamation on June 9, 2000,
encompasses approximately 128,400
acres of Federal land administered by
the BLM; approximately 54,700 acres of
State Trust land (administered by the
Arizona State Land Department); and
approximately 6,000 acres that are
privately owned. The Proposed RMP/
Final EIS affects only Federal lands and
Federal interests located within the
established boundary of the monument.
The BLM’s Tucson Field Office has the
responsibility of planning for and
management of Federal lands within the
monument.
Issues identified as part of the
planning process and addressed in the
Proposed RMP/Final EIS include air
resources, biological resources, cultural
resources, fire management, grazing
management, hazardous materials, lands
and realty, mineral and energy
resources, Native American issues,
recreation, social and economic
conditions, soils, wilderness
characteristics, transportation and
access, visual resources, and water
resources. The Proposed RMP/Final EIS
includes strategies for protecting and
preserving the biological, cultural,
recreational, geological, educational,
scientific, and scenic values for which
the monument was established.
Four alternatives were analyzed in the
Proposed RMP/Final EIS. The ‘‘no
action’’ alternative represents current
management of the Ironwood Forest
National Monument. Three additional
‘‘action’’ alternatives present reasonable,
yet varying, management scenarios. The
alternatives range from emphasizing
maintenance of the naturalness of the
Ironwood Forest National Monument
(by restricting some human uses) to
emphasizing continued human uses,
while still protecting the objects and
resources for which the monument was
established. The range of alternatives in
the Proposed RMP/Final EIS evaluates
planning decisions brought forward
from current BLM planning documents,
including the Phoenix Resource
Management Plan (1989), Arizona
Standards for Rangeland Health and
Guidelines for Grazing Administration
(1987), and the Arizona Statewide Land
Use Plan Amendment for Fire, Fuels,
and Air Quality Management (2003).
Comments on the Draft RMP/EIS
received from the public and internal
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:41 Sep 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
BLM review were considered and
incorporated as appropriate into the
proposed plan. Public comments
resulted in a variety of clarifications and
modifications throughout the Proposed
RMP/Final EIS, but did not significantly
change the overall proposed land use
plan. Revisions made between the Draft
RMP/EIS and the Proposed RMP/Final
EIS include: Identification of objects of
the monument to be protected and more
detailed analysis of the impacts on the
objects of the monument; the addition of
an alternative to allow recreational
shooting in specific areas, and the
inclusion of a shooting analysis of the
planning area; deferral of the decision to
classify two ephemeral grazing
allotments as perennial; and
quantification of some management
goals and objectives, and modifications
to implementation-level decisions to
correctly categorize them as plan-level
decisions or administrative actions.
Other revisions of certain management
actions consisted of the following:
Under cultural resources, Cocoraque
Butte will not be allocated to public use;
also under cultural resources, cultural
resource surveys were conducted along
roads that would be open for motorized
use, and survey findings have been
added to the RMP as well as associated
impacts for each alternative; under
travel management, some minor changes
have been made to the alternatives to
close certain routes and open others to
motorized use, resulting in minor
changes to the overall number of miles
of routes designated for various uses;
also under travel management,
mechanized use would now be allowed
on all designated routes with the
exception of routes designated as trails
or where otherwise restricted; under
vegetation management, the proposed
plan has been revised and proposes that
only native plants be used in restoration
activities; under lands and realty, utility
corridors have been shifted so that they
are not centered on the existing right-ofway in order to increase
maneuverability for additional utilities;
also under lands and realty, the BLM
will not acquire surface estate unless
mineral estate can be acquired
concurrently (or is already federally
owned).
Instructions for filing a protest with
the Director of the BLM regarding the
Proposed RMP/Final EIS may be found
in the ‘‘Dear Reader Letter’’ of the
Ironwood Forest National Monument
Proposed RMP/Final EIS and at 43 CFR
1610.5–2. E-mail and faxed protests will
not be accepted unless the protesting
party also provides the original letter by
either regular or overnight mail
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
59157
postmarked by the close of the protest
period. Under these conditions, the
BLM will consider the e-mail or faxed
protest as an advance copy and it will
receive full consideration. If you wish to
provide the BLM with such advance
notification, please direct faxed protests
to the attention of the BLM protest
coordinator at 202–452–5112, and email to Brenda_HudgensWilliams@blm.gov.
All protests, including the follow-up
letter to e-mails or faxes, must be in
writing and mailed to the appropriate
address, as set forth in the ADDRESSES
section above.
Before including your phone number,
e-mail address, or other personal
identifying information in your protest,
you should be aware that your entire
protest—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your protest
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR
1506.10, 43 CFR 1610.2, 43 CFR 1610.5.
James G. Kenna,
Arizona State Director.
[FR Doc. 2011–24340 Filed 9–22–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–32–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLCO–9230000–L1430000–ET0000; COC–
0124534]
Public Land Order No. 7783; Extension
of Withdrawal Created by Subtitle A of
Public Law 104–201; CO
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Public Land Order.
SUMMARY: This order extends the
duration of a withdrawal created by
Subtitle A of Public Law 104–201 for an
additional 15-year period. Subtitle A of
Public Law 104–201 withdrew 3,133
acres of public lands and 11,415 acres
of Federally owned minerals at the Fort
Carson Military Reservation, and 2,517
acres of public lands and approximately
130,139 acres of Federally owned
˜
minerals at the Pinon Canyon Maneuver
Site from all forms of appropriation
under the public land laws, including
the mining laws, mineral and
geothermal leasing laws, and mineral
materials disposal laws, and reserved
the lands for use by the Army for
military maneuvering, training and
E:\FR\FM\23SEN1.SGM
23SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 185 (Friday, September 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59156-59157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24340]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLAZG03000.L16100000.DQ0000. LXSS085A0000.241A.00]
Notice of Availability of the Proposed Ironwood Forest National
Monument Resource Management Plan/Final EIS
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended, and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of
1976, as amended, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has prepared a
Proposed Resource Management Plan (RMP)/Final Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for the Ironwood Forest National Monument and by this
notice is announcing its availability.
DATES: BLM planning regulations state that any person who meets the
conditions as described in the regulations may protest the BLM's
Proposed RMP/Final EIS. The protest must be filed within 30 days of the
date that the Environmental Protection Agency publishes this notice in
the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Ironwood Forest National Monument Proposed
RMP/Final EIS have been sent to affected Federal, State, and local
government agencies; the Ak Chin Indian Community, Gila River Indian
Community, Tohono O'odham Nation, Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian
Community, and San Carlos Apache Indian Community; and to other
stakeholders. Copies of the Proposed RMP/Final EIS are available for
public inspection at the BLM Tucson Field Office, 12661 East Broadway
Boulevard, Tucson, Arizona. Interested persons may also review the
Proposed RMP/Final EIS on the Internet at https://www.blm.gov/az/st/en/prog/planning/ironwood.html. All protests must be in writing and mailed
to the following addresses:
Regular Mail:
BLM Director (210), Attention: Brenda Hudgens-Williams, P.O. Box
71383, Washington, DC 20024-1383
Overnight Mail:
BLM Director (210), Attention: Brenda Hudgens-Williams, 20 M.
Street, SE., Room 2134LM, Washington, DC 20003.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Olais, Ironwood Forest National
Monument Manager, Tucson Field Office, 12661 East Broadway, Tucson,
Arizona 85748-7208; or by telephone at 520-258-7235; or by e-mail at
lolais@blm.gov. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-
800-877-8339 to contact the above individual during
[[Page 59157]]
normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a
week, to leave a message or question with the above individual. You
will receive a reply during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Ironwood Forest National Monument,
established by Presidential Proclamation on June 9, 2000, encompasses
approximately 128,400 acres of Federal land administered by the BLM;
approximately 54,700 acres of State Trust land (administered by the
Arizona State Land Department); and approximately 6,000 acres that are
privately owned. The Proposed RMP/Final EIS affects only Federal lands
and Federal interests located within the established boundary of the
monument. The BLM's Tucson Field Office has the responsibility of
planning for and management of Federal lands within the monument.
Issues identified as part of the planning process and addressed in
the Proposed RMP/Final EIS include air resources, biological resources,
cultural resources, fire management, grazing management, hazardous
materials, lands and realty, mineral and energy resources, Native
American issues, recreation, social and economic conditions, soils,
wilderness characteristics, transportation and access, visual
resources, and water resources. The Proposed RMP/Final EIS includes
strategies for protecting and preserving the biological, cultural,
recreational, geological, educational, scientific, and scenic values
for which the monument was established.
Four alternatives were analyzed in the Proposed RMP/Final EIS. The
``no action'' alternative represents current management of the Ironwood
Forest National Monument. Three additional ``action'' alternatives
present reasonable, yet varying, management scenarios. The alternatives
range from emphasizing maintenance of the naturalness of the Ironwood
Forest National Monument (by restricting some human uses) to
emphasizing continued human uses, while still protecting the objects
and resources for which the monument was established. The range of
alternatives in the Proposed RMP/Final EIS evaluates planning decisions
brought forward from current BLM planning documents, including the
Phoenix Resource Management Plan (1989), Arizona Standards for
Rangeland Health and Guidelines for Grazing Administration (1987), and
the Arizona Statewide Land Use Plan Amendment for Fire, Fuels, and Air
Quality Management (2003).
Comments on the Draft RMP/EIS received from the public and internal
BLM review were considered and incorporated as appropriate into the
proposed plan. Public comments resulted in a variety of clarifications
and modifications throughout the Proposed RMP/Final EIS, but did not
significantly change the overall proposed land use plan. Revisions made
between the Draft RMP/EIS and the Proposed RMP/Final EIS include:
Identification of objects of the monument to be protected and more
detailed analysis of the impacts on the objects of the monument; the
addition of an alternative to allow recreational shooting in specific
areas, and the inclusion of a shooting analysis of the planning area;
deferral of the decision to classify two ephemeral grazing allotments
as perennial; and quantification of some management goals and
objectives, and modifications to implementation-level decisions to
correctly categorize them as plan-level decisions or administrative
actions. Other revisions of certain management actions consisted of the
following: Under cultural resources, Cocoraque Butte will not be
allocated to public use; also under cultural resources, cultural
resource surveys were conducted along roads that would be open for
motorized use, and survey findings have been added to the RMP as well
as associated impacts for each alternative; under travel management,
some minor changes have been made to the alternatives to close certain
routes and open others to motorized use, resulting in minor changes to
the overall number of miles of routes designated for various uses; also
under travel management, mechanized use would now be allowed on all
designated routes with the exception of routes designated as trails or
where otherwise restricted; under vegetation management, the proposed
plan has been revised and proposes that only native plants be used in
restoration activities; under lands and realty, utility corridors have
been shifted so that they are not centered on the existing right-of-way
in order to increase maneuverability for additional utilities; also
under lands and realty, the BLM will not acquire surface estate unless
mineral estate can be acquired concurrently (or is already federally
owned).
Instructions for filing a protest with the Director of the BLM
regarding the Proposed RMP/Final EIS may be found in the ``Dear Reader
Letter'' of the Ironwood Forest National Monument Proposed RMP/Final
EIS and at 43 CFR 1610.5-2. E-mail and faxed protests will not be
accepted unless the protesting party also provides the original letter
by either regular or overnight mail postmarked by the close of the
protest period. Under these conditions, the BLM will consider the e-
mail or faxed protest as an advance copy and it will receive full
consideration. If you wish to provide the BLM with such advance
notification, please direct faxed protests to the attention of the BLM
protest coordinator at 202-452-5112, and e-mail to Brenda_Hudgens-Williams@blm.gov.
All protests, including the follow-up letter to e-mails or faxes,
must be in writing and mailed to the appropriate address, as set forth
in the ADDRESSES section above.
Before including your phone number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your protest, you should be aware
that your entire protest--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your protest to withhold your personal
identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we
will be able to do so.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10, 43 CFR 1610.2, 43 CFR
1610.5.
James G. Kenna,
Arizona State Director.
[FR Doc. 2011-24340 Filed 9-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-32-P