In the Matter of Certain Display Devices, Including Digital Televisions and Monitors II; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Joint Motion by Complainant and Respondents To Terminate the Investigation in Its Entirety on the Basis of a Settlement Agreement; Termination of the Investigation, 58840-58841 [2011-24382]

Download as PDF 58840 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 184 / Thursday, September 22, 2011 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Reclamation Central Valley Project Improvement Act; Refuge Water Management Plans Bureau of Reclamation, Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability. AGENCY: To meet the requirements of the Central Valley Project Improvement Act of 1992 (CVPIA) and subsequent Department of the Interior administrative review process, the Bureau of Reclamation developed and published the Criteria for Developing Refuge Water Management Plans (Refuge Criteria). Several entities have each developed a Refuge Water Management Plan (Refuge Plan), which Reclamation has evaluated and preliminarily determined to meet the requirements of these Refuge Criteria (see list in Supplementary Information below). Willow Creek Mutual Water Company Refuge Plan was developed in accordance with the Refuge Criteria applicable to the conservation easements that have been acquired by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Reclamation is publishing this notice in order to allow the public to review the plans and comment on the preliminary determinations. Public comment on Reclamation’s preliminary (i.e., draft) determination is invited at this time. DATES: All public comments must be received by October 24, 2011. ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to Ms. Christy Ritenour, Bureau of Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way, MP– 410, Sacramento, California 95825; or e-mail at critenour@usbr.gov. SUMMARY: To be placed on a mailing list for any subsequent information, please contact Ms. Christy Ritenour at critenour@usbr. gov, or call (916) 978–5281 (TDD 978– 5608). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following Refuge Water Management Plans are available for review: • San Luis National Wildlife Refuge • Kern National Wildlife Refuge • Merced National Wildlife Refuge • Pixley National Wildlife Refuge • Los Banos State Wildlife Area • Volta State Wildlife Area • North Grassland State Wildlife Area • Mendota State Wildlife Area • Grassland Resource Conservation District (GRCD) • Delevan National Wildlife Refuge • Colusa National Wildlife Refuge • Sacramento National Wildlife Refuge jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:25 Sep 21, 2011 Jkt 223001 • Gray Lodge State Wildlife Area • Willow Creek Mutual Water Company (conservation easement lands) We are inviting the public to comment on our preliminary (i.e., draft) determination of Refuge Plan adequacy. The Refuge Criteria provides a common methodology, or standard, for efficient use of water by Federal Wildlife Refuges, State wildlife management areas, and resource conservation districts that receive water under provisions of the CVPIA. The Refuge Criteria can be found at the following Web site https://www.usbr.gov/mp/ watershare/documents.html under the Refuge Criteria topic panel. Reclamation will evaluate Refuge Plans based on these criteria. These Refuge Plans are available at Reclamation’s Mid-Pacific Regional Office, 2800 Cottage Way, MP– 410, Sacramento, California, 95825. If you wish to receive a copy of these Refuge Plans, please contact Ms. Christy Ritenour. Our practice is to make comments, including names and home addresses of respondents, available for public review. Public Disclosure Before including your name, address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Dated: September 16, 2011. Richard J. Woodley, Regional Resources Manager, Mid-Pacific Region, Bureau of Reclamation. [FR Doc. 2011–24338 Filed 9–21–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–765] In the Matter of Certain Display Devices, Including Digital Televisions and Monitors II; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Joint Motion by Complainant and Respondents To Terminate the Investigation in Its Entirety on the Basis of a Settlement Agreement; Termination of the Investigation International Trade Commission. AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 ACTION: Notice. Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 9) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) granting a joint motion by Complainant and Respondents to terminate the investigation on the basis of a settlement agreement. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Panyin A. Hughes, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–3042. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on March 11, 2011, based on a complaint filed by Sony Corporation of Tokyo, Japan (‘‘Sony’’). 76 FR 13432 (Mar. 11, 2011). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain display devices, including digital televisions and monitors by reason of infringement of various claims of United States Patent Nos. 5,731,847; 5,583,577; 6,661,472; and RE40,468. The complaint named LG Electronics, Inc. of Seoul, Korea, and LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (collectively, ‘‘LG’’) as respondents. On August 10, 2011, Sony and LG filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation in its entirety based on the execution of a settlement agreement and term sheets. On August 22, 2011, the Commission investigative attorney filed a response in support of the motion to terminate the investigation. On August 25, 2011, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 9) terminating the investigation. None of the parties petitioned for review of the ID. The SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM 22SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 184 / Thursday, September 22, 2011 / Notices Commission has determined not to review the ID. Accordingly, this investigation is terminated. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). Issued: September 19, 2011. By order of the Commission. James R. Holbein, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2011–24382 Filed 9–21–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–779] In the Matter of Certain Flip-Top Vials and Products Using the Same; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 9) granting a joint motion to terminate the above-captioned investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, D.C. 20436, telephone (202) 708–2532. Copies of nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, D.C. 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on June 22, 2011, based on a complaint jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:25 Sep 21, 2011 Jkt 223001 filed by CSP Technologies, Inc. of Auburn, Alabama that named as ¨ respondents Sud-Chemie AG of ¨ Germany; Sud-Chemie, Inc. of Louisville, Kentucky; and Airsec S.A.S. of France. 76 FR 36576 (June 22, 2011). The complaint alleged a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation, sale for importation, and sale within the United States after importation of certain flip-top vials and products using the same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,537,137. On August 16, 2011, the private parties filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation on the basis of withdrawal of the complaint. See 19 CFR 210.21(a)(1). The Commission investigative attorney did not oppose the motion, and on August 29, 2011, the ALJ granted the motion as an ID (Order No. 9). No petitions for review of the ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). Issued: September 19, 2011. By order of the Commission. James R. Holbein, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2011–24337 Filed 9–21–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–764] Certain Digital Televisions and Components Thereof, and Certain Electronic Devices Having a Blu-Ray Disc Player and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on a Settlement Agreement; Termination of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 13) granting a joint motion to terminate the investigation SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 58841 based on a settlement agreement. The investigation is terminated. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan M. Valentine, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2301. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. The Commission instituted this investigation on March 9, 2011, based on complaints filed by LG Electronics, Inc. of Seoul, Korea (‘‘LGE’’). 76 FR 12994–5 (Mar. 9, 2011). The complaints allege violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain digital televisions and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,785,906; RE 37,326; 5,533,071; and 5,923,711, and of certain electronic devices having a Blu-Ray disc player and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,701,835; 7,577,080; 7,619,961; and 7,756,398. The complaints further allege the existence of a domestic industry. The Commission’s notice of investigation named as respondents Sony Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; Sony Corporation of America of New York, New York; Sony Electronics, Inc. of San Diego, California; Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc. of Tokyo, Japan; and Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC of Foster City, California (collectively ‘‘Sony’’). On August 10, 2011, LGE and Sony filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation based on their having entered into a binding memorandum of understanding, which resolves all of LGE’s claims against Sony. On August 22, 2011, the Commission investigative SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM 22SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 184 (Thursday, September 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58840-58841]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24382]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-765]


 In the Matter of Certain Display Devices, Including Digital 
Televisions and Monitors II; Notice of Commission Determination Not To 
Review an Initial Determination Granting a Joint Motion by Complainant 
and Respondents To Terminate the Investigation in Its Entirety on the 
Basis of a Settlement Agreement; Termination of the Investigation

AGENCY: International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 9) of the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ'') granting a joint motion by Complainant and Respondents to 
terminate the investigation on the basis of a settlement agreement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Panyin A. Hughes, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3042. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on March 11, 2011, based on a complaint filed by Sony Corporation of 
Tokyo, Japan (``Sony''). 76 FR 13432 (Mar. 11, 2011). The complaint 
alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 
1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for 
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of 
certain display devices, including digital televisions and monitors by 
reason of infringement of various claims of United States Patent Nos. 
5,731,847; 5,583,577; 6,661,472; and RE40,468. The complaint named LG 
Electronics, Inc. of Seoul, Korea, and LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of 
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (collectively, ``LG'') as respondents.
    On August 10, 2011, Sony and LG filed a joint motion to terminate 
the investigation in its entirety based on the execution of a 
settlement agreement and term sheets. On August 22, 2011, the 
Commission investigative attorney filed a response in support of the 
motion to terminate the investigation.
    On August 25, 2011, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 9) 
terminating the investigation. None of the parties petitioned for 
review of the ID. The

[[Page 58841]]

Commission has determined not to review the ID. Accordingly, this 
investigation is terminated.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in section 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure 
(19 CFR 210.42).

     Issued: September 19, 2011.

    By order of the Commission.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-24382 Filed 9-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.