Virginia Electric and Power Company, Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2; Exemption, 58844-58846 [2011-24359]
Download as PDF
58844
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 184 / Thursday, September 22, 2011 / Notices
to conduct activities regulated under the
Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978.
NSF has published regulations under
the Antarctic Conservation Act at Title
45 Part 670 of the Code of Federal
Regulations. This is the required notice
of permit applications received.
Interested parties are invited to
submit written data, comments, or
views with respect to this permit
application by October 24, 2011. This
application may be inspected by
interested parties at the Permit Office,
address below.
DATES:
Comments should be
addressed to Permit Office, Room 755,
Office of Polar Programs, National
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson
Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Polly A. Penhale at the above address or
(703) 292–7420.
The
National Science Foundation, as
directed by the Antarctic Conservation
Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95–541), as
amended by the Antarctic Science,
Tourism and Conservation Act of 1996,
has developed regulations for the
establishment of a permit system for
various activities in Antarctica and
designation of certain animals and
certain geographic areas a requiring
special protection. The regulations
establish such a permit system to
designate Antarctic Specially Protected
Areas.
The applications received are as
follows:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Permit Application: 2012–009
1. Applicant: Sam Feola, Director,
Raytheon Polar Services Company, 7400
S. Tucson Way, Centennial, CO 80112.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Activity for Which Permit Is Requested
Enter Antarctic Specially Protected
Areas. The applicant plans to enter the
Antarctic Specially Protect Areas at Port
Foster, Deception Island (ASPA 145),
Western Bransfield Straight (ASPA 152),
and Eastern Dallmann Bay (ASPA 153)
for marine transit of U.S. Antarctic
Program (USAP) research vessels,
Nathaniel B. Palmer and the Lawrence
M. Gould through the ASPA’s listed
above. Any transits through these areas
would only occur when necessary in the
best interests of the USAP. The ASPA’s
will be avoided whenever possible.
Location
ASPA 145-Port Foster, Deception
Island, ASPA 152-Western Bransfield
Straight, and ASPA 153-Eastern
Dallmann Bay.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Sep 21, 2011
Jkt 223001
Dates
October 1, 2011 to September 30,
2014.
Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer, Office of Polar Programs.
[FR Doc. 2011–24358 Filed 9–21–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–280 and 50–281; NRC–
2011–0185]
Virginia Electric and Power Company,
Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2;
Exemption
1.0
Background
Virginia Electric and Power Company
(VEPCO, the licensee) is the holder of
Facility Operating License Nos. DPR–32
and DRP–37, which authorize operation
of the Surry Power Station, Units 1 and
2 (Surry 1 and 2) respectively. The
license provides, among other things,
that the facility is subject to all rules,
regulations, and orders of the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC,
the Commission) now or hereafter in
effect. The facility consists of two
pressurized water reactors located in
Surry County, Virginia.
2.0
Request/Action
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) Part 26, ‘‘Fitness
For Duty Programs,’’ Subpart I
‘‘Managing Fatigue,’’ requires that
individuals described in 10 CFR
26.4(a)(1) through (a)(5) are subject to
the work hour controls provided in 10
CFR 26.205. By letter dated February 10,
2011 (Agencywide Documents Access
and Management System (ADAMS)
Accession No. ML110450583), and
supplemented on March 10, 2011
(ADAMS Accession No. ML110740442),
and pursuant to 10 CFR 26.9 VEPCO
doing business as Dominion requested
an exemption from the requirements of
10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) during
declarations of severe weather
conditions such as tropical storm and
hurricane force winds at the Surry 1 and
2 site. A subsequent response to
requests for additional information
(RAI) is dated May 26, 2011 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML111470265).
The requested exemption applies to
individuals who perform duties
identified in 10 CFR 26.4(a)(1) through
(a)(5) who are designated to perform
work as a member of the Surry 1 and 2
hurricane response organization (HRO).
The exemption request states that the
station HRO typically consists of
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
enough individuals to staff two 12-hour
shifts of workers consisting of personnel
from operations, maintenance,
engineering, emergency planning,
radiation protection, chemistry, site
services and security to maintain the
safe and secure operation of the plant.
Entry conditions for the requested
exemption occur when the site activates
the station HRO and the Site Vice
President (or his designee) determines
that travel conditions to the site will
potentially become hazardous such that
HRO staffing will be required—based on
verifiable weather conditions. Verifiable
weather conditions are defined in the
exemption request as when the National
Weather Service issues an Inland High
Wind Warning for Hurricane Force
Winds for Surry County or when the
Dominion Weather Center projects
tropical storm or hurricane force winds
onsite within 12 hours.
After the high wind conditions pass,
wind damage to the plant and
surrounding area might preclude
sufficient numbers of individuals from
immediately returning to the site.
Additionally, if mandatory civil
evacuations were ordered, this would
also delay the return of sufficient relief
personnel. The exemption request states
that the exemption will terminate when
hurricane watches and warnings or
inland hurricane watches and warnings
have been cancelled; when weather
conditions and highway infrastructure
support safe travel and; when the Site
Vice President or his designee
determine that sufficient personnel who
perform the duties identified in 10 CFR
26.4(a)(1) through (a)(5) are available to
restore normal shift rotation and thereby
meet the requirements of 10 CFR
26.205(c) and (d).
3.0 Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 26.09, the
Commission may, upon application of
an interested person or on its own
initiative, grant exemptions from the
requirements of 10 CFR part 26 when
the exemptions are authorized by law
and will not endanger life or property or
the common defense and security or are
otherwise in the public interest.
Authorized By Law
The exemption being requested for
Surry 1 and 2 would allow the licensee
site to not meet the work hour control
requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and
(d), which would allow the sequester of
specific individuals on site, prior and
subsequent to severe weather conditions
such as tropical storms and hurricanes.
No law exists which precludes the
activities covered by this exemption
request. As stated above, 10 CFR 26.09
E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM
22SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 184 / Thursday, September 22, 2011 / Notices
allows the NRC to grant exemptions
from the requirements of 10 CFR part
26. The NRC staff has determined that
granting of the licensee’s proposed
exemption will not result in a violation
of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended, or the Commission’s
regulations. Therefore, the exemption is
authorized by law.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
No Endangerment of Life or Property
and Otherwise in the Public Interest
This exemption request expands on
an exception that is already provided in
10 CFR part 26, during declared
emergencies, and allows the licensee to
not meet the requirements in 10 CFR
26.205(c) and (d) during time periods
just prior and subsequent to the existing
exception (10 CFR 26.207(d)). Granting
this exemption will allow the licensee
to ensure that the control of work hours
does not impede the ability to use
whatever staff resources may be
necessary to respond to a severe weather
event to ensure the plant reaches and
maintains a safe and secure status.
Therefore, this exemption will not
endanger life or property or the common
defense and security. Thus, this
exemption request is in the interest of
the public health and safety.
The Fatigue Management provisions
found in 10 CFR part 26, Subpart I are
designed as an integrated approach to
managing both cumulative and acute
fatigue through a partnership between
licensees and individuals. It is the
responsibility of the licensees to provide
training to individuals regarding fatigue
management. It is also the responsibility
of the licensee to provide covered
workers with work schedules that are
consistent with the objective of
preventing impairment from fatigue due
to duration, frequency or sequencing of
successive shifts. Individuals are
required to remain fit-for-duty while at
work.
• Section 26.205(c) is the requirement
to schedule individuals work hours
consistent with the objective of
preventing impairment from fatigue due
to duration, frequency or sequencing of
successive shifts. The requirement to
schedule is important as the work hour
controls, contained in 10 CFR 26.205 are
not necessarily sufficient to ensure that
individuals will not be impaired owing
to the effects of fatigue.
• Section 26.205(d) provides the
actual work hour controls. Work hour
controls are limits on the number of
hours an individual may work; limits on
the minimum break times between work
periods; and limits for the minimum
number of days off an individual must
be given.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Sep 21, 2011
Jkt 223001
• Section 26.205(b) is the requirement
to count work hours and days worked.
Section 26.205(d)(3) is the requirement
to look back into the ‘‘calculation
period’’ so that all work hours can be
included in appropriate work hour
calculations, when a covered individual
resumes covered work.
• Section 26.207(d) provides an
allowance for licensees to not meet the
requirements of Section. 26.205(c) and
(d) during declared emergencies as
defined in the licensee’s emergency
plan.
Surry Units 1 and 2 are located in
Surry County, Virginia on a point of
land that is bordered by the James River
on either side. Historical severe weather
in the vicinity of the station, over a 100
year period, includes 34 tropical storms
and 10 hurricanes that have passed
within 100 nautical miles of the site.
Consequently, there is a reasonable
likelihood of Surry 1 and 2 being
affected by severe wind events. The
proposed exemption would support
effective response to severe weather
conditions when travel to and from the
Surry 1 and 2 site may not be safe or
even possible.
During these times, the Surry 1 and 2
HRO staff typically consists of enough
individuals to staff two 12-hour shifts of
workers consisting of personnel from
operations, maintenance, engineering,
emergency planning, radiation
protection, chemistry, site services and
security to maintain the safe and secure
operation of the plant. This exemption
would be applied to the period
established by the entry and exit
conditions regardless of whether the
Emergency Plan is entered or not.
Therefore, Surry 1 and 2’s exemption
request can be characterized as having
three parts: (1) High-wind exemption
encompassing the period starting with
the initiating conditions to just prior to
declaration of an unusual event, (2) a
period defined as immediately
following a high-wind condition, when
an unusual event is not declared, but
when a recovery period is still required,
and (3) a recovery exemption
immediately following an existing 10
CFR 26.207(d) exception as discussed
above. Once Surry 1 and 2 has entered
into a high-wind exemption or 10 CFR
26.207(d) exception, it would not need
to make a declaration that it is invoking
the recovery exemption.
As a tropical storm or hurricane
approaches landfall, high wind
speeds—in excess of wind speeds that
create unsafe travel conditions are
expected. The National Hurricane
Center defines a hurricane warning as
an announcement that hurricane
conditions (sustained winds of 74 mph
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58845
or higher) are expected somewhere
within the specified coastal area within
a 24-hour period. Severe wind
preparedness activities become difficult
once winds reach tropical storm force,
a tropical storm warning is issued 36
hours in advance of the anticipated
onset of tropical-storm-force winds (39
to 73 mph). Lessons learned that are
included in NUREG–1474, ‘‘Effect of
Hurricane Andrew on the Turkey Point
Nuclear Generating Station from August
20–30, 1992,’’ include the
acknowledgement that detailed,
methodical preparations should be
made prior to the onset of hurricane
force winds. The NRC staff finds the
Surry 1 and 2 proceduralized actions are
consistent with those lessons learned.
The entry conditions for the requested
exemption could have been exceeded,
yet wind speeds necessary for the
declaration of an unusual event may not
have been reached. This circumstance
may still require a recovery period.
Also, high winds that make travel
unsafe but that fall below the threshold
of an emergency, could be present for
several days. After the high wind
condition has passed, sufficient
numbers of personnel may not be able
to access the site to relieve the
sequestered individuals. An exemption
during these conditions is consistent
with the intent of the 10 CFR 26.207(d)
exemption.
Following a declared emergency,
under 10 CFR 26.207(d), due to high
wind conditions, the site may not be
accessible by sufficient numbers of
personnel to allow relief of the
sequestered individuals. Once the high
wind conditions have passed and the
unusual event exited, a recovery period
might be necessary. An exemption
during these circumstances is consistent
with the intent of 10 CFR 26.207(d).
The RAI response letter states that the
HRO shift start times will be preplanned and consistent and that the
hurricane response plan is being revised
to emphasize the need for pre-planned
and consistent work shift start times to
better facilitate fatigue management.
The RAI response also states that the
hurricane response plan will be updated
to include that the HRO staff will be
provided with an opportunity for
restorative rest of at least 10 hours when
off and that these individuals will not
be assigned any duties when off shift.
The exemption request specifies that
the exemption is not for discretionary
maintenance activities. The exemption
request states that the exemption would
provide for use of whatever plant staff
and resources may be necessary to
respond to a plant emergency and
ensure that the units achieve and
E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM
22SEN1
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
58846
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 184 / Thursday, September 22, 2011 / Notices
maintain a safe and secure status and
can be safely restarted. The exemption
request also states that maintenance
activities for structures, systems and
components that are significant to
public health and safety will be
performed, if required. The NRC staff
finds the exclusion of discretionary
maintenance from the exemption
request to be consistent with the intent
of the exemption.
In its exemption request the licensee
committed to maintain the following
guidance in a Surry 1 and 2 site
procedure:
• The conditions necessary to
sequester site personnel that are
consistent with the conditions specified
in the Surry 1 and 2 exemption request.
• The provisions for ensuring that
personnel who are not performing
duties are provided an opportunity as
well as accommodations for restorative
rest.
• The condition for departure from
this exemption, consistent with the Site
Vice President’s (or his designee’s)
determination that adequate staffing is
available to meet the requirements of
Part 26.205(c) and (d).
In its RAI response letter the licensee
committed to maintain the following
guidance in its hurricane response
procedure:
• Guidance that emphasizes the need
for pre-planned and consistent workshift start times to better facilitate
fatigue management.
• Guidance that states that the Station
Hurricane Response Organization staff
will be provided an opportunity for at
least 10 hours of restorative rest when
off-shift and should not be assigned any
duties when off-shift.
When the exemption period(s) ends,
the licensee is immediately subject to
the scheduling requirements of 10 CFR
26.205(c) and the work hour/rest break/
days off requirements of 10 CFR
26.205(d), and must ensure that any
individual performing covered work
complies with these requirements.
Section 26.205(d)(3) requires the
licensee to ‘‘look back’’ over the
calculation period and count the hours
the individual has worked and the rest
breaks and days off he/she has had,
including those that occurred during the
licensee-declared emergency. Hours
worked must be below the maximum
limits and rest breaks must be above the
minimum requirements in order for the
licensee to allow the individual to
perform covered work. Days off and
hours and shifts worked during the
licensee-declared emergency and the
exempted period before and after the
declared emergency, would be counted
as usual in the establishment of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Sep 21, 2011
Jkt 223001
applicable shift schedule and
compliance with the minimum-days-off
requirements.
Granting these exemptions is
consistent with 10 CFR 26.207(d) Plant
Emergencies which allows the licensee
to not meet the requirements of 10 CFR
26.205(c) and (d) during declared
emergencies as defined in the licensee’s
emergency plan. The Part 26 Statement
of Considerations, page 17148 states that
‘‘Plant emergencies are extraordinary
circumstances that may be most
effectively addressed through staff
augmentation that can only be
practically achieved through the use of
work hours in excess of the limits of 10
CFR 26.205(c) and (d).’’ The objective of
the exemption is to ensure that the
control of work hours does not impede
a licensee’s ability to use whatever staff
resources may be necessary to respond
to a plant emergency and ensure that the
plant reaches and maintains a safe and
secure status. The actions described in
the exemption request and submitted
procedures are consistent with the
recommendations in NUREG–1474,
‘‘Effect of Hurricane Andrew on the
Turkey Point Nuclear Generating
Station from August 20–30, 1992.’’ Also
consistent with NUREG–1474, the NRC
staff expects the licensee would have
completed a reasonable amount of
hurricane preparation prior to the need
to sequester personnel, in order to
minimize personnel exposure to high
winds.
The NRC staff has reviewed the
exemption request from certain work
hour controls during conditions of high
winds and recovery from high wind
conditions. Based on the considerations
discussed above, the NRC staff has
concluded that (1) There is reasonable
assurance that the health and safety of
the public will not be endangered by the
proposed exemption, (2) such activities
will be consistent with the
Commission’s regulations and guidance,
and (3) the issuance of the exemption
will not be contrary to the common
defense and security or to the health
and safety of the public.
Consistent With Common Defense and
Security
This change has no relation to
security issues. Therefore, the common
defense and security is not impacted by
this exemption.
4.0 Conclusion
Accordingly, the Commission has
determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
26.09, granting an exemption to the
licensee from the requirements in 10
CFR 26.205(c) and (d) during severe
wind events such as tropical storms and
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
hurricanes and bounded by the entry
and exit conditions of the exemption
request, by allowing Surry 1 and 2 to
sequester individuals to ensure the
plant reaches and maintains a safe and
secure status, is authorized by law and
will not endanger life or property and is
otherwise in the public interest.
Therefore, the Commission hereby
grants Virginia Electric Power Company
an exemption from the requirement of
10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) during periods
of severe winds.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the
Commission has determined that the
granting of this exemption will not have
a significant effect on the quality of the
human environment published in the
Federal Register on August 31, 2011 (76
FR 54259).
This exemption is effective upon
issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 13th day
of September 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph G. Giitter,
Director, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2011–24359 Filed 9–21–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2009–0494]
Final Interim Staff Guidance: Review of
Evaluation To Address Gas
Accumulation Issues in Safety Related
Systems
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) staff is issuing its
Final Interim Staff Guidance (ISG) DC/
COL–ISG–019 (Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS) Accession No.
ML111110572). The purpose of this ISG
is to clarify the NRC staff guidance to
address issues of gas accumulation in
safety related systems. This ISG revises
and updates the guidance provided to
the staff in Standard Review Plan (SRP)
Section 5.4.7, ‘‘Residual Heat Removal
System,’’ Section 6.3, ‘‘Emergency Core
Cooling System,’’ and Section 6.5.2,
‘‘Containment Spray System’’ of
NUREG–0800, ‘‘Standard Review Plan
for the Review of Safety Analysis
Reports for Nuclear Power Plants,’’
March 2007. The NRC staff issues DC/
COL–ISGs to facilitate timely
implementation of current staff
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM
22SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 184 (Thursday, September 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58844-58846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24359]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-280 and 50-281; NRC-2011-0185]
Virginia Electric and Power Company, Surry Power Station, Units 1
and 2; Exemption
1.0 Background
Virginia Electric and Power Company (VEPCO, the licensee) is the
holder of Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-32 and DRP-37, which
authorize operation of the Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2 (Surry 1
and 2) respectively. The license provides, among other things, that the
facility is subject to all rules, regulations, and orders of the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) now or hereafter in
effect. The facility consists of two pressurized water reactors located
in Surry County, Virginia.
2.0 Request/Action
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 26,
``Fitness For Duty Programs,'' Subpart I ``Managing Fatigue,'' requires
that individuals described in 10 CFR 26.4(a)(1) through (a)(5) are
subject to the work hour controls provided in 10 CFR 26.205. By letter
dated February 10, 2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management
System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML110450583), and supplemented on March
10, 2011 (ADAMS Accession No. ML110740442), and pursuant to 10 CFR 26.9
VEPCO doing business as Dominion requested an exemption from the
requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) during declarations of severe
weather conditions such as tropical storm and hurricane force winds at
the Surry 1 and 2 site. A subsequent response to requests for
additional information (RAI) is dated May 26, 2011 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML111470265).
The requested exemption applies to individuals who perform duties
identified in 10 CFR 26.4(a)(1) through (a)(5) who are designated to
perform work as a member of the Surry 1 and 2 hurricane response
organization (HRO). The exemption request states that the station HRO
typically consists of enough individuals to staff two 12-hour shifts of
workers consisting of personnel from operations, maintenance,
engineering, emergency planning, radiation protection, chemistry, site
services and security to maintain the safe and secure operation of the
plant.
Entry conditions for the requested exemption occur when the site
activates the station HRO and the Site Vice President (or his designee)
determines that travel conditions to the site will potentially become
hazardous such that HRO staffing will be required--based on verifiable
weather conditions. Verifiable weather conditions are defined in the
exemption request as when the National Weather Service issues an Inland
High Wind Warning for Hurricane Force Winds for Surry County or when
the Dominion Weather Center projects tropical storm or hurricane force
winds onsite within 12 hours.
After the high wind conditions pass, wind damage to the plant and
surrounding area might preclude sufficient numbers of individuals from
immediately returning to the site. Additionally, if mandatory civil
evacuations were ordered, this would also delay the return of
sufficient relief personnel. The exemption request states that the
exemption will terminate when hurricane watches and warnings or inland
hurricane watches and warnings have been cancelled; when weather
conditions and highway infrastructure support safe travel and; when the
Site Vice President or his designee determine that sufficient personnel
who perform the duties identified in 10 CFR 26.4(a)(1) through (a)(5)
are available to restore normal shift rotation and thereby meet the
requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d).
3.0 Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 26.09, the Commission may, upon application of
an interested person or on its own initiative, grant exemptions from
the requirements of 10 CFR part 26 when the exemptions are authorized
by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and
security or are otherwise in the public interest.
Authorized By Law
The exemption being requested for Surry 1 and 2 would allow the
licensee site to not meet the work hour control requirements of 10 CFR
26.205(c) and (d), which would allow the sequester of specific
individuals on site, prior and subsequent to severe weather conditions
such as tropical storms and hurricanes. No law exists which precludes
the activities covered by this exemption request. As stated above, 10
CFR 26.09
[[Page 58845]]
allows the NRC to grant exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR part
26. The NRC staff has determined that granting of the licensee's
proposed exemption will not result in a violation of the Atomic Energy
Act of 1954, as amended, or the Commission's regulations. Therefore,
the exemption is authorized by law.
No Endangerment of Life or Property and Otherwise in the Public
Interest
This exemption request expands on an exception that is already
provided in 10 CFR part 26, during declared emergencies, and allows the
licensee to not meet the requirements in 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d)
during time periods just prior and subsequent to the existing exception
(10 CFR 26.207(d)). Granting this exemption will allow the licensee to
ensure that the control of work hours does not impede the ability to
use whatever staff resources may be necessary to respond to a severe
weather event to ensure the plant reaches and maintains a safe and
secure status. Therefore, this exemption will not endanger life or
property or the common defense and security. Thus, this exemption
request is in the interest of the public health and safety.
The Fatigue Management provisions found in 10 CFR part 26, Subpart
I are designed as an integrated approach to managing both cumulative
and acute fatigue through a partnership between licensees and
individuals. It is the responsibility of the licensees to provide
training to individuals regarding fatigue management. It is also the
responsibility of the licensee to provide covered workers with work
schedules that are consistent with the objective of preventing
impairment from fatigue due to duration, frequency or sequencing of
successive shifts. Individuals are required to remain fit-for-duty
while at work.
Section 26.205(c) is the requirement to schedule
individuals work hours consistent with the objective of preventing
impairment from fatigue due to duration, frequency or sequencing of
successive shifts. The requirement to schedule is important as the work
hour controls, contained in 10 CFR 26.205 are not necessarily
sufficient to ensure that individuals will not be impaired owing to the
effects of fatigue.
Section 26.205(d) provides the actual work hour controls.
Work hour controls are limits on the number of hours an individual may
work; limits on the minimum break times between work periods; and
limits for the minimum number of days off an individual must be given.
Section 26.205(b) is the requirement to count work hours
and days worked. Section 26.205(d)(3) is the requirement to look back
into the ``calculation period'' so that all work hours can be included
in appropriate work hour calculations, when a covered individual
resumes covered work.
Section 26.207(d) provides an allowance for licensees to
not meet the requirements of Section. 26.205(c) and (d) during declared
emergencies as defined in the licensee's emergency plan.
Surry Units 1 and 2 are located in Surry County, Virginia on a
point of land that is bordered by the James River on either side.
Historical severe weather in the vicinity of the station, over a 100
year period, includes 34 tropical storms and 10 hurricanes that have
passed within 100 nautical miles of the site. Consequently, there is a
reasonable likelihood of Surry 1 and 2 being affected by severe wind
events. The proposed exemption would support effective response to
severe weather conditions when travel to and from the Surry 1 and 2
site may not be safe or even possible.
During these times, the Surry 1 and 2 HRO staff typically consists
of enough individuals to staff two 12-hour shifts of workers consisting
of personnel from operations, maintenance, engineering, emergency
planning, radiation protection, chemistry, site services and security
to maintain the safe and secure operation of the plant. This exemption
would be applied to the period established by the entry and exit
conditions regardless of whether the Emergency Plan is entered or not.
Therefore, Surry 1 and 2's exemption request can be characterized as
having three parts: (1) High-wind exemption encompassing the period
starting with the initiating conditions to just prior to declaration of
an unusual event, (2) a period defined as immediately following a high-
wind condition, when an unusual event is not declared, but when a
recovery period is still required, and (3) a recovery exemption
immediately following an existing 10 CFR 26.207(d) exception as
discussed above. Once Surry 1 and 2 has entered into a high-wind
exemption or 10 CFR 26.207(d) exception, it would not need to make a
declaration that it is invoking the recovery exemption.
As a tropical storm or hurricane approaches landfall, high wind
speeds--in excess of wind speeds that create unsafe travel conditions
are expected. The National Hurricane Center defines a hurricane warning
as an announcement that hurricane conditions (sustained winds of 74 mph
or higher) are expected somewhere within the specified coastal area
within a 24-hour period. Severe wind preparedness activities become
difficult once winds reach tropical storm force, a tropical storm
warning is issued 36 hours in advance of the anticipated onset of
tropical-storm-force winds (39 to 73 mph). Lessons learned that are
included in NUREG-1474, ``Effect of Hurricane Andrew on the Turkey
Point Nuclear Generating Station from August 20-30, 1992,'' include the
acknowledgement that detailed, methodical preparations should be made
prior to the onset of hurricane force winds. The NRC staff finds the
Surry 1 and 2 proceduralized actions are consistent with those lessons
learned.
The entry conditions for the requested exemption could have been
exceeded, yet wind speeds necessary for the declaration of an unusual
event may not have been reached. This circumstance may still require a
recovery period. Also, high winds that make travel unsafe but that fall
below the threshold of an emergency, could be present for several days.
After the high wind condition has passed, sufficient numbers of
personnel may not be able to access the site to relieve the sequestered
individuals. An exemption during these conditions is consistent with
the intent of the 10 CFR 26.207(d) exemption.
Following a declared emergency, under 10 CFR 26.207(d), due to high
wind conditions, the site may not be accessible by sufficient numbers
of personnel to allow relief of the sequestered individuals. Once the
high wind conditions have passed and the unusual event exited, a
recovery period might be necessary. An exemption during these
circumstances is consistent with the intent of 10 CFR 26.207(d).
The RAI response letter states that the HRO shift start times will
be pre-planned and consistent and that the hurricane response plan is
being revised to emphasize the need for pre-planned and consistent work
shift start times to better facilitate fatigue management. The RAI
response also states that the hurricane response plan will be updated
to include that the HRO staff will be provided with an opportunity for
restorative rest of at least 10 hours when off and that these
individuals will not be assigned any duties when off shift.
The exemption request specifies that the exemption is not for
discretionary maintenance activities. The exemption request states that
the exemption would provide for use of whatever plant staff and
resources may be necessary to respond to a plant emergency and ensure
that the units achieve and
[[Page 58846]]
maintain a safe and secure status and can be safely restarted. The
exemption request also states that maintenance activities for
structures, systems and components that are significant to public
health and safety will be performed, if required. The NRC staff finds
the exclusion of discretionary maintenance from the exemption request
to be consistent with the intent of the exemption.
In its exemption request the licensee committed to maintain the
following guidance in a Surry 1 and 2 site procedure:
The conditions necessary to sequester site personnel that
are consistent with the conditions specified in the Surry 1 and 2
exemption request.
The provisions for ensuring that personnel who are not
performing duties are provided an opportunity as well as accommodations
for restorative rest.
The condition for departure from this exemption,
consistent with the Site Vice President's (or his designee's)
determination that adequate staffing is available to meet the
requirements of Part 26.205(c) and (d).
In its RAI response letter the licensee committed to maintain the
following guidance in its hurricane response procedure:
Guidance that emphasizes the need for pre-planned and
consistent work-shift start times to better facilitate fatigue
management.
Guidance that states that the Station Hurricane Response
Organization staff will be provided an opportunity for at least 10
hours of restorative rest when off-shift and should not be assigned any
duties when off-shift.
When the exemption period(s) ends, the licensee is immediately
subject to the scheduling requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and the work
hour/rest break/days off requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(d), and must
ensure that any individual performing covered work complies with these
requirements. Section 26.205(d)(3) requires the licensee to ``look
back'' over the calculation period and count the hours the individual
has worked and the rest breaks and days off he/she has had, including
those that occurred during the licensee-declared emergency. Hours
worked must be below the maximum limits and rest breaks must be above
the minimum requirements in order for the licensee to allow the
individual to perform covered work. Days off and hours and shifts
worked during the licensee-declared emergency and the exempted period
before and after the declared emergency, would be counted as usual in
the establishment of the applicable shift schedule and compliance with
the minimum-days-off requirements.
Granting these exemptions is consistent with 10 CFR 26.207(d) Plant
Emergencies which allows the licensee to not meet the requirements of
10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) during declared emergencies as defined in the
licensee's emergency plan. The Part 26 Statement of Considerations,
page 17148 states that ``Plant emergencies are extraordinary
circumstances that may be most effectively addressed through staff
augmentation that can only be practically achieved through the use of
work hours in excess of the limits of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d).'' The
objective of the exemption is to ensure that the control of work hours
does not impede a licensee's ability to use whatever staff resources
may be necessary to respond to a plant emergency and ensure that the
plant reaches and maintains a safe and secure status. The actions
described in the exemption request and submitted procedures are
consistent with the recommendations in NUREG-1474, ``Effect of
Hurricane Andrew on the Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station from
August 20-30, 1992.'' Also consistent with NUREG-1474, the NRC staff
expects the licensee would have completed a reasonable amount of
hurricane preparation prior to the need to sequester personnel, in
order to minimize personnel exposure to high winds.
The NRC staff has reviewed the exemption request from certain work
hour controls during conditions of high winds and recovery from high
wind conditions. Based on the considerations discussed above, the NRC
staff has concluded that (1) There is reasonable assurance that the
health and safety of the public will not be endangered by the proposed
exemption, (2) such activities will be consistent with the Commission's
regulations and guidance, and (3) the issuance of the exemption will
not be contrary to the common defense and security or to the health and
safety of the public.
Consistent With Common Defense and Security
This change has no relation to security issues. Therefore, the
common defense and security is not impacted by this exemption.
4.0 Conclusion
Accordingly, the Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
26.09, granting an exemption to the licensee from the requirements in
10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) during severe wind events such as tropical
storms and hurricanes and bounded by the entry and exit conditions of
the exemption request, by allowing Surry 1 and 2 to sequester
individuals to ensure the plant reaches and maintains a safe and secure
status, is authorized by law and will not endanger life or property and
is otherwise in the public interest. Therefore, the Commission hereby
grants Virginia Electric Power Company an exemption from the
requirement of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) during periods of severe winds.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the Commission has determined that the
granting of this exemption will not have a significant effect on the
quality of the human environment published in the Federal Register on
August 31, 2011 (76 FR 54259).
This exemption is effective upon issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 13th day of September 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph G. Giitter,
Director, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2011-24359 Filed 9-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P