Safety Zone; M/V DAVY CROCKETT, Columbia River, 58112-58114 [2011-24146]
Download as PDF
58112
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g) of the Instruction because it
involves the establishment of a
temporary safety zone. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination will
be available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
42°36′31″ N, 082°48′2″ W. All
geographic coordinates are North
American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).
(b) Effective and Enforcement Period.
This rule is effective and will be
enforced from 10 p.m. through 10:30
p.m. on September 24, 2011.
(c) Regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general
regulations in Section 165.23 of this
part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Detroit, or his designated on-scene
representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Detroit or his designated on-scene
representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port is any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer who has been designated by the
Captain of the Port to act on his behalf.
The on-scene representative of the
Captain of the Port will be aboard either
a Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary
vessel. The Captain of the Port or his
designated on scene representative may
be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port Detroit
or his on-scene representative to obtain
permission to do so.
(5) Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the safety zone
must comply with all directions given to
them by the Captain of the Port or his
on-scene representative.
Dated: September 6, 2011.
E.J. Marohn,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Captain of the Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. 2011–24143 Filed 9–19–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
■
2. Add § 165.T09–0721 to read as
follows:
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
Safety Zone; M/V DAVY CROCKETT,
Columbia River
§ 165.T09–0721 Safety zone; Giannangeli
Wedding Fireworks, Lake St. Clair, Harrison
Township, MI.
AGENCY:
(a) Location. The safety zone will
encompass all U. S. navigable waters on
Lake St. Clair within a 420 foot radius
of Harrison Township, MI at position
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:50 Sep 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0939 ]
RIN 1625–AA00
ACTION:
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
The U.S. Coast Guard is
extending the enforcement period of a
safety zone established on the waters of
the Columbia River surrounding the
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
remaining cofferdam at the M/V DAVY
CROCKETT removal sight at
approximate river mile 117. The original
safety zone was established on January
28, 2011. The safety zone is necessary
to help ensure the safety of the response
workers and maritime public from the
hazards associated with the ongoing
worksite cleanup operations. All
persons and vessels are prohibited from
entering or remaining in the safety zone
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port, Columbia River or his designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective in the CFR
from September 20, 2011 through
October 31, 2011. This rule is effective
with actual notice for purposes of
enforcement on September 1, 2011. This
rule will remain in effect through
October 31, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2010–
0939 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2010–0939 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail BM1 Silvestre Suga,
Waterways Management Division,
Marine Safety Unit Portland, Coast
Guard; telephone 503–240–9319, e-mail
Silvestre.G.Suga@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because to do
so would be contrary to public interest.
The safety zone is immediately
E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM
20SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
necessary to help ensure the safety of
the response workers and the maritime
public due to the ongoing worksite
cleanup operations.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register because the safety zone is
immediately necessary to help ensure
the safety of the response workers and
the maritime public due to the ongoing
worksite cleanup operations.
Background and Purpose
The remaining cofferdam at the M/V
DAVY CROCKETT removal sight is
located on the Washington State side of
the Columbia River at approximately
river mile 117. The Coast Guard, other
state and federal agencies, and federal
contractors are continuing a worksite
cleanup following the removal of M/V
DAVY CROCKETT. The cleanup
operations require a minimal wake in
the vicinity of the cofferdam to help
ensure the safety of response workers.
Only authorized persons and/or vessels
can be safely allowed in the worksite
cleanup area.
A 300 ft safety zone is necessary to
keep vessels clear of the ongoing
worksite cleanup in and around the
cofferdam. The previous 300 ft safety
zone will expire on August 31, 2011.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is extending the
enforcement of the safety zone created
by this rule until October 31, 2011. The
safety zone will cover all waters of the
Columbia River encompassed within the
following four points: Point one at
45°34′59.74″ N/122°28′35.00″ W on the
Washington bank of the Columbia River
then proceeding into the river to point
two at 45°34′51.42″ N/122°28′35.47″ W,
then proceeding upriver to the third
point at 45°34′51.02″ N/122°28′07.32″
W, then proceeding to the shoreline to
the fourth point on the Washington
Bank at 45°34′56.06″ N/122°28′07.36″
W, then back along the shoreline to
point one. Geographically this
encompasses all the waters within an
area starting at approximately 300 ft
upriver from the cofferdam cleanup site
extending to 300 ft abreast of the
cofferdam cleanup site and then ending
300 ft down river of the cofferdam
cleanup site.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:50 Sep 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Executive Order
12866 or under section 1 of Executive
Order 13563. The Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed it under
that those Orders.
The Coast Guard has made this
determination based on the fact that the
safety zones created by this rule will not
significantly affect the maritime public
because the areas covered are limited in
size and/or have little commercial or
recreational activity. In addition, vessels
may enter the safety zones with the
permission of the Captain of the Port,
Columbia River or his designated
representative.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule may affect the following
entities some of which may be small
entities: The owners and operators of
vessels intending to operate in the areas
covered by the safety zones created in
this rule. The safety zones will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
because the areas covered are limited in
size. In addition, vessels may enter the
safety zones with the permission of the
Captain of the Port, Columbia River or
his designated representative.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
58113
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminates
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM
20SER1
58114
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:50 Sep 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves the creation of safety zones. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination will
be available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
the Captain of the Port, Columbia River
or his designated representative.
(c) Enforcement Period. The safety
zone created in this section will be in
effect from September 1, 2011 through
October 31, 2011 unless cancelled
sooner by the Captain of the Port,
Columbia River.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T13–175 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T13–175 Safety Zone; M/V DAVY
CROCKETT Cleanup site, Columbia River.
(a) Location: The following area is a
safety zone:
(1) All waters of the Columbia River
encompassed within the following four
points: Point one at 45°34′59.74″ N/
122°28′35.00″ W on the Washington
bank of the Columbia River then
proceeding into the river to point two at
45°34′51.42″ N/122°28′35.47″ W, then
proceeding upriver to the third point at
45°34′51.02″ N/122°28′07.32″ W, then
proceeding to the shoreline to the fourth
point on the Washington Bank at
45°34′56.06″ N/122°28′07.36″ W, then
back along the shoreline to point one.
Geographically this encompasses all the
waters within an area starting at
approximately 300 ft upriver from the
cofferdam cleanup site extending to 300
ft abreast of the cofferdam cleanup site
and then ending 300 ft down river of the
cofferdam cleanup site.
(2) [Reserved]
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in 33 CFR Part
165, Subpart C, no person may enter or
remain in the safety zone created in this
section or bring, cause to be brought, or
allow to remain in the safety zone
created in this section any vehicle,
vessel, or object unless authorized by
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Dated: August 30, 2011.
B.C. Jones,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Columbia River.
[FR Doc. 2011–24146 Filed 9–19–11; 8:45 am]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2011–0288; FRL–9468–4]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; Control of Particulate
Matter Emissions From the Operation
of Outdoor Wood-Fired Boilers
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania. This SIP revision pertains
to the control of particulate matter
emissions from the operation of outdoor
wood-fired boilers (OWBs). EPA is
approving this revision to reduce
particular matter emissions from the
operation of outdoor wood-fired boilers
in accordance with the requirements of
the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective on October 20, 2011.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2011–0288. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the electronic
docket, some information is not publicly
available, i.e., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
https://www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy for public inspection during
normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM
20SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 20, 2011)]
[Unknown Section]
[Pages 58112-58114]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24146]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0939 ]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; M/V DAVY CROCKETT, Columbia River
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Coast Guard is extending the enforcement period of a
safety zone established on the waters of the Columbia River surrounding
the remaining cofferdam at the M/V DAVY CROCKETT removal sight at
approximate river mile 117. The original safety zone was established on
January 28, 2011. The safety zone is necessary to help ensure the
safety of the response workers and maritime public from the hazards
associated with the ongoing worksite cleanup operations. All persons
and vessels are prohibited from entering or remaining in the safety
zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, Columbia River or
his designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective in the CFR from September 20, 2011
through October 31, 2011. This rule is effective with actual notice for
purposes of enforcement on September 1, 2011. This rule will remain in
effect through October 31, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2010-0939 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2010-0939 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail BM1 Silvestre Suga, Waterways Management
Division, Marine Safety Unit Portland, Coast Guard; telephone 503-240-
9319, e-mail Silvestre.G.Suga@uscg.mil. If you have questions on
viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because to do so would be contrary to public
interest. The safety zone is immediately
[[Page 58113]]
necessary to help ensure the safety of the response workers and the
maritime public due to the ongoing worksite cleanup operations.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register because the safety zone is
immediately necessary to help ensure the safety of the response workers
and the maritime public due to the ongoing worksite cleanup operations.
Background and Purpose
The remaining cofferdam at the M/V DAVY CROCKETT removal sight is
located on the Washington State side of the Columbia River at
approximately river mile 117. The Coast Guard, other state and federal
agencies, and federal contractors are continuing a worksite cleanup
following the removal of M/V DAVY CROCKETT. The cleanup operations
require a minimal wake in the vicinity of the cofferdam to help ensure
the safety of response workers. Only authorized persons and/or vessels
can be safely allowed in the worksite cleanup area.
A 300 ft safety zone is necessary to keep vessels clear of the
ongoing worksite cleanup in and around the cofferdam. The previous 300
ft safety zone will expire on August 31, 2011.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is extending the enforcement of the safety zone
created by this rule until October 31, 2011. The safety zone will cover
all waters of the Columbia River encompassed within the following four
points: Point one at 45[deg]34'59.74'' N/122[deg]28'35.00'' W on the
Washington bank of the Columbia River then proceeding into the river to
point two at 45[deg]34'51.42'' N/122[deg]28'35.47'' W, then proceeding
upriver to the third point at 45[deg]34'51.02'' N/122[deg]28'07.32'' W,
then proceeding to the shoreline to the fourth point on the Washington
Bank at 45[deg]34'56.06'' N/122[deg]28'07.36'' W, then back along the
shoreline to point one. Geographically this encompasses all the waters
within an area starting at approximately 300 ft upriver from the
cofferdam cleanup site extending to 300 ft abreast of the cofferdam
cleanup site and then ending 300 ft down river of the cofferdam cleanup
site.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed it under that those Orders.
The Coast Guard has made this determination based on the fact that
the safety zones created by this rule will not significantly affect the
maritime public because the areas covered are limited in size and/or
have little commercial or recreational activity. In addition, vessels
may enter the safety zones with the permission of the Captain of the
Port, Columbia River or his designated representative.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule may affect the following entities some of which may
be small entities: The owners and operators of vessels intending to
operate in the areas covered by the safety zones created in this rule.
The safety zones will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities because the areas covered are
limited in size. In addition, vessels may enter the safety zones with
the permission of the Captain of the Port, Columbia River or his
designated representative.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminates ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not
[[Page 58114]]
an economically significant rule and does not create an environmental
risk to health or risk to safety that may disproportionately affect
children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of
the Instruction. This rule involves the creation of safety zones. An
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination will be available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T13-175 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-175 Safety Zone; M/V DAVY CROCKETT Cleanup site,
Columbia River.
(a) Location: The following area is a safety zone:
(1) All waters of the Columbia River encompassed within the
following four points: Point one at 45[deg]34'59.74'' N/
122[deg]28'35.00'' W on the Washington bank of the Columbia River then
proceeding into the river to point two at 45[deg]34'51.42'' N/
122[deg]28'35.47'' W, then proceeding upriver to the third point at
45[deg]34'51.02'' N/122[deg]28'07.32'' W, then proceeding to the
shoreline to the fourth point on the Washington Bank at
45[deg]34'56.06'' N/122[deg]28'07.36'' W, then back along the shoreline
to point one. Geographically this encompasses all the waters within an
area starting at approximately 300 ft upriver from the cofferdam
cleanup site extending to 300 ft abreast of the cofferdam cleanup site
and then ending 300 ft down river of the cofferdam cleanup site.
(2) [Reserved]
(b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 33
CFR Part 165, Subpart C, no person may enter or remain in the safety
zone created in this section or bring, cause to be brought, or allow to
remain in the safety zone created in this section any vehicle, vessel,
or object unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, Columbia River
or his designated representative.
(c) Enforcement Period. The safety zone created in this section
will be in effect from September 1, 2011 through October 31, 2011
unless cancelled sooner by the Captain of the Port, Columbia River.
Dated: August 30, 2011.
B.C. Jones,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Columbia River.
[FR Doc. 2011-24146 Filed 9-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P