Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; North Carolina: Redesignation of the Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir 1997 Annual Fine Particulate Matter Nonattainment Area to Attainment, 58210-58226 [2011-24103]
Download as PDF
58210
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
VI. Proposed Action
Pursuant to sections 179 and
181(b)(2)(A) of the CAA, EPA is
proposing to determine that the
Washington Area has attained the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS by its moderate
area attainment date, June 15, 2010. If
EPA finalizes this determination, the
requirements to submit an attainment
demonstration and associated RACM,
RFP plan, contingency measures, and
any other planning requirements related
to attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS will be suspended, as provided
in 40 CFR section 51.918, so long as the
area continues to attain the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS. EPA is soliciting public
comments on the issues discussed in
this document. These comments will be
considered before taking final action.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
VII. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 Sep 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, these proposed
determinations of attainment of the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the
Washington Area do not have Tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), because this proposed action is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt
Tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: August 31, 2011.
W.C. Early,
Garvin, Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2011–24098 Filed 9–19–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA–R04–OAR–2009–1010–201063; FRL–
9467–7]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans and Designation
of Areas for Air Quality Planning
Purposes; North Carolina:
Redesignation of the HickoryMorganton-Lenoir 1997 Annual Fine
Particulate Matter Nonattainment Area
to Attainment
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
SIP revisions submitted on December
18, 2009, and December 22, 2010
(supplemental submission) by the State
of North Carolina, through the North
Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (NC DENR),
Division of Air Quality (DAQ), to
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
support North Carolina’s request to
redesignate the Hickory-MorgantonLenoir fine particulate matter (PM2.5)
nonattainment area (hereafter the
‘‘Hickory Area’’ or ‘‘Area’’) to
attainment for the 1997 Annual PM2.5
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS). The Hickory Area is
comprised of Catawba County in its
entirety. EPA is now proposing four
separate but related actions. First, EPA
is proposing to approve the December
18, 2009, PM2.5 redesignation request,
including the December 22, 2010, Motor
Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES)
mobile model supplement for the
Hickory Area, provided that EPA takes
final action to approve specific
provisions of the North Carolina Clean
Smokestacks Act (NCCSA). Second,
EPA is proposing to approve North
Carolina’s 2008 emissions inventory for
the Hickory Area under section
172(c)(3) of the Clean Air Act (CAA or
Act). Third, subject to the same proviso
regarding the NCCSA and final approval
of the 2008 emissions inventory, EPA is
proposing to approve the 1997 Annual
PM2.5 NAAQS maintenance plan for the
Hickory Area, including the 2008
baseline emissions inventory, and the
motor vehicle emission budgets
(MVEBs) for nitrogen oxides (NOX) for
the years 2011 and 2021, and the mobile
insignificance determination for direct
PM2.5 for the Hickory Area. EPA is also
describing the status of its
transportation conformity adequacy
determination for the new 2011 and
2021 MVEBs for NOX that are contained
in the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS
maintenance plan for the Hickory Area.
Fourth and separate from the action to
redesignate the Hickory Area, EPA is
proposing to determine that the Area
has attained the 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS by its applicable attainment
date of April 5, 2010. These proposed
actions are being taken pursuant to the
CAA and its implementing regulations.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before October 20, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2009–1010, by one of the
following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: benjamin.lynorae@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (404) 562–9019.
4. Mail: EPA–R04–OAR–2009–1010,
Regulatory Development Section, Air
Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Ms.
Lynorae Benjamin, Chief, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office’s normal hours of
operation. The Regional Office’s official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal
holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R04–OAR–2009–
1010. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail,
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The https://
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 Sep 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Regulatory Development Section,
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joel
Huey, Regulatory Development Section,
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Joel Huey
may be reached by phone at (404) 562–
9104 or via electronic mail at
huey.joel@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. What are the actions EPA is proposing to
take?
II. What is the background for EPA’s
proposed actions?
III. What are the criteria for redesignation?
IV. Why is EPA proposing these actions?
V. What is the effect of EPA’s proposed
actions?
VI. What is EPA’s analysis of the request?
VII. What is EPA’s analysis of North
Carolina’s proposed direct PM2.5
insignificance determination and the
proposed NOX MVEBs for the Hickory
area?
VIII. What is the status of EPA’s adequacy
determination for the proposed NOX
MVEBs for 2011 and 2021 and for the
Direct PM2.5 insignificance
determination for the Hickory area?
IX. What is EPA’s analysis of the proposed
2008 base year emissions inventory for
the Hickory area?
X. Proposed Actions on the Redesignation
Request and Maintenance Plan SIP
Revision Including Proposed Approval
of the 2011 and 2021 NOX MVEBs and
for the Insignificance Determination for
the Hickory Area
XI. Proposed Action on the Determination
that the Hickory Area Has Attained the
1997 PM2.5 NAAQS by Its Applicable
Attainment Date
XII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What are the actions EPA is
proposing to take?
EPA is proposing to take the following
four separate but related actions, some
of which involve multiple elements: (1)
To redesignate the Hickory Area to
attainment for the 1997 Annual PM2.5
NAAQS, provided EPA approves the
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
58211
emissions inventory submitted with the
maintenance plan as well as the
NCCSA, which is the subject of separate
Federal rulemaking action; (2) to
approve, under section 172(c)(3) of the
CAA, the emissions inventory submitted
with the maintenance plan; (3) to
approve into the North Carolina SIP,
under section 175A of the CAA,
Hickory’s 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS
maintenance plan, including the
associated MVEBs (EPA is also notifying
the public of the status of EPA’s
adequacy determination for the Hickory
Area MVEBs); and (4) to determine,
pursuant to section 179(c) of the CAA,
that the Hickory Area attained the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS by its attainment date of
April 5, 2010.
On January 5, 2010, at 75 FR 230, EPA
determined that the Hickory Area was
attaining the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA
is now proposing to determine that the
Area is continuing to attain the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS and to take several
additional related actions regarding the
Area, which are summarized below and
described in greater detail throughout
this notice of proposed rulemaking.
First, EPA proposes to determine that,
if EPA’s proposed approvals of the 2008
baseline emissions inventory for the
Hickory Area and the NCCSA Federal
rulemaking action are finalized, the
Area has met the requirements for
redesignation under section 107(d)(3)(E)
of the CAA. In this action, EPA is
proposing to approve a request to
change the legal designation of Catawba
County in the Hickory Area from
nonattainment to attainment for the
1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS. The
emissions inventory is being proposed
for approval today, and the NCCSA
rules were proposed for approval in a
separate action on June 22, 2011 (76 FR
36468).
Second, EPA is proposing to approve
North Carolina’s 2008 emissions
inventory for the Hickory Area (under
CAA section 172(c)(3)). North Carolina
selected 2008 as the attainment
emissions inventory year for the
Hickory Area. This attainment inventory
identifies a level of emissions in the
Area that is sufficient to attain the 1997
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS and is a current,
comprehensive inventory that meets the
requirements of section 172(c)(3).
Third, subject to EPA’s final approval
of the NCCSA into the SIP, EPA is
proposing to approve North Carolina’s
1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS
maintenance plan for the Hickory Area
as meeting the requirements of CAA
section 175A (such approval being one
of the CAA criteria for redesignation to
attainment status). The maintenance
plan is designed to help keep the
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
58212
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Hickory Area in attainment of the 1997
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS through 2021.
Consistent with the CAA, the
maintenance plan that EPA is proposing
to approve today also includes NOx
MVEBs for the years 2011 and 2021 and
an insignificance determination for the
mobile source contribution of direct
PM2.5 to the air quality problem in the
Hickory Area. EPA is proposing to
approve into the North Carolina SIP the
2011 and 2021 MVEBs that are included
as part of North Carolina’s maintenance
plan for the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS
and the insignificance determination for
the mobile source contribution of direct
PM2.5 emissions in the Area.
On a related matter to this third
action, EPA is also notifying the public
of the status of EPA’s adequacy process
(Adequacy) for the newly-established
NOx MVEBs for 2011 and 2021 for the
Hickory Area and the mobile source
insignificance determination for direct
PM2.5 emissions. The Adequacy
comment period for the Hickory Area
2011 and 2021 MVEBs began on
November 23, 2010, with EPA’s posting
of the availability of this submittal on
EPA’s Adequacy Web site (https://
www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/
transconf/currsips.htm). The Adequacy
comment period for these MVEBs and
the insignificance determination for
direct PM2.5 emission contribution from
motor vehicles closed on December 23,
2010, and EPA received no adverse
comments. Please see section VIII of this
proposed rulemaking for further
explanation of this process and for more
details on the MVEBs determination and
the insignificance determination.
Fourth and separate from the action to
redesignate the Area, EPA is proposing
to determine, based on quality-assured
and certified monitoring data for the
2007–2009 monitoring period, that the
Hickory Area has attained the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS by its applicable
attainment date of April 5, 2010.
Today’s notice of proposed
rulemaking is in response to North
Carolina’s December 18, 2009, SIP
submittal and subsequent supplement of
December 22, 2010. Those documents
address the specific issues summarized
above and the necessary elements
described in section 107(d)(3)(E) of the
CAA for redesignation of the Hickory
Area to attainment for the 1997 Annual
PM2.5 NAAQS.
II. What is the background for EPA’s
proposed actions?
Fine particle pollution can be emitted
directly or formed secondarily in the
atmosphere. The main precursors of
PM2.5 are sulfur dioxide (SO2), NOx,
ammonia and volatile organic
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 Sep 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
compounds (VOCs). Unless otherwise
noted by the State or EPA, ammonia and
VOCs are presumed to be insignificant
contributors to PM2.5 formation,
whereas SO2 and NOX are presumed to
be significant contributors to PM2.5
formation. Sulfates are a type of
secondary particle formed from SO2
emissions of power plants and
industrial facilities. Nitrates, another
common type of secondary particle, are
formed from NOx emissions of power
plants, automobiles, and other
combustion sources.
On July 18, 1997, EPA promulgated
the first air quality standards for PM2.5.
EPA promulgated an annual standard at
a level of 15 micrograms per cubic meter
(μg/m3), based on a three-year average of
annual mean PM2.5 concentrations. In
the same rulemaking, EPA promulgated
a 24-hour standard of 65 μg/m3, based
on a three-year average of the 98th
percentile of 24-hour concentrations. On
October 17, 2006, at 71 FR 61144, EPA
retained the annual average NAAQS at
15 μg/m3 but revised the 24-hour
NAAQS to 35 μg/m3, based again on the
three-year average of the 98th percentile
of 24-hour concentrations.1 Under EPA
regulations at 40 CFR part 50, the
primary and secondary 1997 Annual
PM2.5 NAAQS are attained when the
annual arithmetic mean concentration,
as determined in accordance with 40
CFR part 50, Appendix N, is less than
or equal to 15.0 μg/m3 at all relevant
monitoring sites in the subject area over
a 3-year period.
On January 5, 2005, at 70 FR 944, and
as supplemented on April 14, 2005, at
70 FR 19844, EPA designated the
Hickory Area as nonattainment for the
1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS. In that
action, EPA defined the 1997 PM2.5
Hickory Area to include Catawba
County in its entirety. On November 13,
2009, at 74 FR 58688, EPA promulgated
designations for the 24-hour standard
established in 2006, designating the
Hickory Area as attaining this NAAQS.
That action clarified that the Hickory
Area was also attaining the 24-hour
NAAQS promulgated in 1997. EPA did
not promulgate designations for the
annual average NAAQS promulgated in
2006 since the NAAQS was essentially
identical to the annual PM2.5 NAAQS
promulgated in 1997. Therefore, the
1 In response to legal challenges of the annual
standard promulgated in 2006, the United States
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit (D.C. Circuit) remanded this NAAQS to EPA
for further consideration. See American Farm
Bureau Federation and National Pork Producers
Council, et al. v. EPA, 559 F.3d 512 (D.C. Cir. 2009).
However, given that the 1997 and 2006 annual
NAAQS are essentially identical, attainment of the
1997 Annual NAAQS would also indicate
attainment of the remanded 2006 Annual NAAQS.
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Hickory Area is designated
nonattainment only for the annual
NAAQS promulgated in 1997, and
today’s action only addresses this
designation.
All 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS areas were
designated under subpart 1 of title I,
part D, of the CAA. Subpart 1 contains
the general requirements for
nonattainment areas for any pollutant
governed by a NAAQS and is less
prescriptive than the other subparts of
title I, part D. On April 25, 2007, at 72
FR 20664, EPA promulgated its PM2.5
Implementation Rule, codified at 40
CFR part 51, subpart Z, in which the
Agency provided guidance for state and
tribal plans to implement the 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS. This rule, at 40 CFR
51.1004(c), specifies some of the
regulatory consequences of attaining the
NAAQS, as discussed below.
On May 12, 2005, EPA published the
Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), which
addressed the interstate transport
requirements of the CAA and required
states to significantly reduce SO2 and
NOx emissions from power plants (70
FR 25162). The associated Federal
Implementation Plans (FIPs) were
published on April 28, 2006 (71 FR
25328). However, on July 11, 2008, the
D.C. Circuit Court issued its decision to
vacate and remand both CAIR and the
associated CAIR FIPs in their entirety
(North Carolina v. EPA, 531 F.3d 836
(D.C. Cir., 2008)). EPA petitioned for
rehearing, and the Court issued an order
remanding CAIR to EPA without
vacating either CAIR or the CAIR FIPs
(North Carolina v. EPA, 550 F.3d 1176
(D.C. Cir., 2008)). The Court left CAIR in
place to ‘‘temporarily preserve the
environmental values covered by CAIR’’
until EPA replaces it with a rule
consistent with the Court’s opinion (id.
at 1178). The Court directed EPA to
‘‘remedy CAIR’s flaws’’ consistent with
its July 11, 2008, opinion but declined
to impose a schedule on EPA for
completing that action (id). As a result
of these court rulings, the power plant
emission reductions that resulted solely
from the development, promulgation,
and implementation of CAIR, and the
associated contribution to air quality
improvement that occurred solely as a
result of CAIR in the Hickory Area
could not be considered to be
permanent.
On August 8, 2011, EPA published
the Cross State Air Pollution Rule
(CSAPR) in the Federal Register under
the title, ‘‘Federal Implementation Plans
to Reduce Interstate Transport of Fine
Particulate Matter and Ozone in 27
States; Correction of SIP Approvals for
22 States’’ (hereafter the ‘‘Cross-State
Air Pollution Rule’’ (CSAPR)) (76 FR
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
48208, August 8, 2011) to address
interstate transport of emissions and
resulting secondary air pollutants and to
replace CAIR. The CAIR emission
reduction requirements limit emissions
in North Carolina and states upwind of
North Carolina through 2011 and the
CSAPR requires similar or greater
reductions in the relevant areas in 2012
and beyond. The emission reductions
that the CSAPR mandates may be
considered to be permanent and
enforceable. In turn, the air quality
improvement in the Hickory Area that
has resulted from EGU emission
reductions associated with CAIR (as
well as the substantial further air quality
improvement that would be expected to
result from full implementation of the
CSAPR) may also be considered to be
permanent and enforceable. EPA
proposes that the requirement in section
107(d)(3)(E)(iii) has now been met
because the emission reduction
requirements of CAIR address emissions
through 2011 and EPA has now
promulgated CSAPR which requires
similar or greater reductions in the
relevant areas in 2012 and beyond.
Because the emission reduction
requirements of CAIR are enforceable
through the 2011 control period, and
because CSAPR has now been
promulgated to address the
requirements previously addressed by
CAIR and gets similar or greater
reductions in the relevant areas in 2012
and beyond, EPA is proposing to
determine that the emission reductions
that led to attainment in the Hickory
nonattainment area can now be
considered permanent and enforceable.
Therefore, EPA propose to find that the
transport requirement of CAA section
107(d)(3)(E)(iii) has been met for the
Hickory Area.
The 3-year ambient air quality data for
2006–2008 indicated no violations of
the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS for the Hickory
Area. As a result, on December 18, 2009,
and as supplemented on December, 22,
2010, North Carolina requested
redesignation of the Hickory Area to
attainment for the 1997 Annual PM2.5
NAAQS. The redesignation request
included three years of complete,
quality-assured ambient air quality data
for the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS for
2006–2008, indicating that the 1997
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS had been
achieved for the Hickory Area. Under
the CAA, nonattainment areas may be
redesignated to attainment if sufficient,
complete, quality-assured data is
available for the Administrator to
determine that the area has attained the
standard and the area meets the other
CAA redesignation requirements in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 Sep 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
section 107(d)(3)(E). From 2005 through
the present, the monitored annual
average PM2.5 values for the Hickory
Area have declined such that the Area
is attaining the 1997 Annual PM2.5
NAAQS. On January 5, 2010, EPA
determined that the Hickory Area had
attained the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS
(75 FR 230). While annual PM2.5
concentrations are dependent on a
variety of conditions, the overall
downtrend in annual PM2.5
concentrations in the Hickory Area can
be attributed to the reduction of SO2
emissions, as will be discussed in more
detail in section VI of this proposed
rulemaking. EPA is now proposing to
find that the Hickory Area continues to
attain the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS.
III. What are the criteria for
redesignation?
The CAA provides the requirements
for redesignating a nonattainment area
to attainment. Specifically, section
107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA allows for
redesignation provided the following
criteria are met: (1) The Administrator
determines that the area has attained the
applicable NAAQS; (2) the
Administrator has fully approved the
applicable implementation plan for the
area under section 110(k); (3) the
Administrator determines that the
improvement in air quality is due to
permanent and enforceable reductions
in emissions resulting from
implementation of the applicable SIP
and applicable Federal air pollutant
control regulations and other permanent
and enforceable reductions; (4) the
Administrator has fully approved a
maintenance plan for the area as
meeting the requirements of section
175A; and (5) the state containing such
area has met all requirements applicable
to the area under section 110 and part
D of title I of the CAA.
EPA has provided guidance on
redesignation in the General Preamble
for the Implementation of title I of the
CAA Amendments of 1990 (April 16,
1992, 57 FR 13498, and supplemented
on April 28, 1992, 57 FR 18070) and has
provided further guidance on processing
redesignation requests in the following
documents:
1. ‘‘Procedures for Processing
Requests to Redesignate Areas to
Attainment,’’ Memorandum from John
Calcagni, Director, Air Quality
Management Division, September 4,
1992 (hereafter referred to as the
‘‘Calcagni Memorandum’’);
2. ‘‘State Implementation Plan (SIP)
Actions Submitted in Response to Clean
Air Act (CAA) Deadlines,’’
Memorandum from John Calcagni,
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
58213
Director, Air Quality Management
Division, October 28, 1992; and
3. ‘‘Part D New Source Review (Part
D NSR) Requirements for Areas
Requesting Redesignation to
Attainment,’’ Memorandum from Mary
D. Nichols, Assistant Administrator for
Air and Radiation, October 14, 1994.
IV. Why is EPA proposing these
actions?
On December 18, 2009, and as
supplemented on December 22, 2010,
the State of North Carolina, through
DAQ, requested redesignation of the
Hickory Area to attainment for the 1997
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA’s evaluation
indicates that the Hickory Area has
attained the 1997 Annual PM2.5
NAAQS. If EPA finalizes approval of the
emissions inventory and the NCCSA
rulemaking, the Area will meet the
requirements for redesignation set forth
in section 107(d)(3)(E), including the
maintenance plan requirements under
section 175A of the CAA. As a result,
EPA is proposing to take the first three
related actions previously summarized.
The fourth action, to determine that
the Area has attained the 1997 Annual
PM2.5 NAAQS by its attainment date, is
being proposed in accordance with
section 179(c)(1) of the CAA based upon
EPA’s review of the data for 2007–2009.
Section 179(c)(1) reads as follows: ‘‘As
expeditiously as practicable after the
applicable attainment date for any
nonattainment area, but not later than 6
months after such date, the
Administrator shall determine, based on
the area’s air quality as of the attainment
date, whether the area attained the
standard by that date.’’ EPA proposes to
determine that the Area attained the
1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS by its
applicable attainment date of April 5,
2010.
V. What is the effect of EPA’s proposed
actions?
EPA’s proposed actions establish the
basis upon which EPA may take final
action on the North Carolina submittal
being proposed for approval today.
Approval of North Carolina’s
redesignation request would change the
legal designation of Catawba County in
North Carolina for the 1997 Annual
PM2.5 NAAQS, found at 40 CFR part 81,
from nonattainment to attainment.
Approval of North Carolina’s request
would also incorporate into the North
Carolina SIP a plan for maintaining the
1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS in the
Hickory Area through 2021. The
maintenance plan includes, among
other components, contingency
measures to remedy potential future
violations of the 1997 Annual PM2.5
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
58214
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
NAAQS. Approval of North Carolina’s
maintenance plan would also result in
approval of the NOX MVEBs and the
direct PM2.5 mobile source
insignificance determination. The
maintenance plan also establishes NOx
MVEBs for 2011 and 2021 for the
Hickory Area of 3,996,601 kilograms per
year (kg/yr) and 2,236,028 kg/yr,
respectively. Final action would also
approve the Area’s emissions inventory
under section 172(c)(3). Additionally,
EPA is notifying the public of the status
of its adequacy determination for the
NOX MVEBs for 2011 and 2021 and the
direct PM2.5 mobile source
insignificance determination pursuant
to 40 CFR 93.118(f)(1).
VI. What is EPA’s analysis of the
request?
As stated above, in accordance with
the CAA, EPA proposes in today’s
action to: (1) Redesignate the Hickory
Area to attainment for the 1997 Annual
PM2.5 NAAQS; (2) approve the Hickory
Area emissions inventory submitted
with the maintenance plan; (3) approve
into the North Carolina SIP Hickory’s
1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS
maintenance plan, including the
associated MVEBs; and (4) determine
that the Hickory Area attained the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS by its attainment date of
April 5, 2010. The first three of these
actions are based upon EPA’s
annual arithmetic mean concentration,
as determined in accordance with 40
CFR part 50, Appendix N, is less than
or equal to 15.0 μg/m3 at all relevant
monitoring sites in the subject area over
a 3-year period. The relevant data must
be collected and quality-assured in
accordance with 40 CFR part 58 and
recorded in the EPA Air Quality System
(AQS). The monitors generally should
have remained at the same location for
the duration of the monitoring period
required for demonstrating attainment.
On January 5, 2010, at 75 FR 230, EPA
determined that the Hickory Area was
attaining the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA
reviewed PM2.5 monitoring data from
Criteria (1)—The Hickory Area Has
monitoring sites in the Hickory Area for
Attained the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS
the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS for the
2006–2008 and the 2007–2009 periods.
For redesignating a nonattainment
These data have been quality-assured
area to attainment, the CAA requires
and are recorded in AQS. The annual
EPA to determine that the area has
arithmetic mean PM2.5 concentrations
attained the applicable NAAQS (CAA
section 107(d)(3)(E)(i)). EPA is
for the 2006–2008, and the 2007–2009
proposing to determine that the Hickory periods, and the 3-year averages of these
Area continues to attain the 1997
values (i.e., design values) are
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS. For PM2.5, an
summarized in Table 1.2 EPA has
area may be considered to be attaining
reviewed more recent data which
the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS if it
indicate that the Hickory Area continues
to attain the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. The
meets the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS,
as determined in accordance with 40
design values for 2007–2009 and 2008–
CFR 50.7 and Appendix N of part 50,
2010 are also included in Table 1 and
based on three complete, consecutive
demonstrate that the Hickory Area
calendar years of quality-assured air
continues to meet the PM2.5 NAAQS and
quality monitoring data. To attain these
that the ambient concentrations of PM2.5
NAAQS, the 3-year average of the
are continuing to decrease in the Area.
determination that the Hickory Area
continues to attain the 1997 Annual
PM2.5 NAAQS and that all other
redesignation criteria have been met for
the Hickory Area, provided EPA
approves the emissions inventory
submitted with the maintenance plan
and the NCCSA rulemaking. The five
redesignation criteria provided under
CAA section 107(d)(3)(E) are discussed
in greater detail for the Area in the
following paragraphs of this section.
The fourth action, EPA’s determination
that the Hickory Area attained the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS by its attainment date of
April 5, 2010, is discussed in section XI.
TABLE 1—DESIGN VALUE CONCENTRATIONS FOR THE HICKORY 1997 ANNUAL PM2.5 NONATTAINMENT AREA
[μg/m3]
County
Site name
Annual average PM2.5 concentrations
(μg/m 3)
Monitor ID
2006
Catawba
Hickory
37–035–0004
2007
2008
2009
2010 3
15.18
14.62
12.75
10.32
11.23
Three-year PM2.5 design values (μg/m3)
2006–2008
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Catawba
2008–2010
37–035–0004
Hickory
2007–2009
14.2
12.6
11.4
The 3-year design value (2006–2008)
submitted by North Carolina for
redesignation of the Hickory Area is
14.2 μg/m3, which meets the NAAQS as
described above. Preliminary 2010 air
quality data that are available in AQS,
but not yet certified, indicate that the
Area continues to attain the PM2.5
NAAQS. As mentioned above, on
January 5, 2010 (75 FR 230) EPA
published a clean data determination for
the Hickory Area for the 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS. In today’s action, EPA is
proposing to determine that the Area is
continuing to attain the 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS. EPA will not go forward with
the redesignation if the Area does not
continue to attain until the time that
EPA finalizes the redesignation. As
discussed in more detail below, the
State of North Carolina has committed
to continue monitoring in the Area in
accordance with 40 CFR part 58.
2 The values in Table 1 represent the most current
quality assured, quality controlled and certified
ambient air monitoring data available in the EPA
AQS database and therefore differ slightly from the
values submitted in the North Carolina
redesignation request.
3 The preliminary PM
2.5 ambient air quality data
for 2010 for the Hickory Area indicates that the
Area is attaining the NAAQS with 2008–2010
design values. This preliminary data includes
complete data from all quarters of 2010 but has not
yet been certified and is thus subject to change.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:42 Sep 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Criteria (5)—North Carolina Has met all
Applicable Requirements Under Section
110 and Part D of Title I of the CAA;
and Criteria (2)—North Carolina Has a
Fully Approved SIP Under Section
110(k) for the Hickory Area
For redesignating a nonattainment
area to attainment, the CAA requires
EPA to determine that the state has met
all applicable requirements under
section 110 and part D of title I of the
CAA (CAA section 107(d)(3)(E)(v)) and
that the state has a fully approved SIP
under section 110(k) for the area (CAA
section 107(d)(3)(E)(ii)). EPA proposes
to find that North Carolina has met all
applicable SIP requirements for the
Hickory Area under section 110 of the
CAA (general SIP requirements) for
purposes of redesignation. EPA also
proposes to find that the North Carolina
SIP satisfies the criterion that it meet
applicable SIP requirements for
purposes of redesignation under part D
of title I of the CAA (requirements
specific to 1997 Annual PM2.5
nonattainment areas). Further, EPA
proposes to determine that the SIP is
fully approved with respect to all
requirements applicable under section
110(k). In making these determinations,
EPA ascertained which requirements are
applicable to the Area and, if applicable,
that they are fully approved under the
CAA. For the purposes of review of the
State’s redesignation request, the SIP
needs only to be fully approved with
respect to requirements that were
applicable prior to submittal of the
complete redesignation request.
a. Hickory Area Has Met All Applicable
Requirements Under Section 110 and
Part D of Title I of the CAA
General SIP requirements. Section
110(a)(2) of title I of the CAA delineates
the general requirements for a SIP,
which include enforceable emissions
limitations and other control measures,
means, or techniques; provisions for the
establishment and operation of
appropriate devices necessary to collect
data on ambient air quality; and
programs to enforce the limitations.
General SIP elements and requirements
are delineated in section 110(a)(2) of
title I, part A of the CAA. These
requirements include, but are not
limited to, the following: submittal of a
SIP that has been adopted by the state
after reasonable public notice and
hearing; provisions for establishment
and operation of appropriate procedures
needed to monitor ambient air quality;
implementation of a source permit
program; provisions for the
implementation of part C requirements
(Prevention of Significant Deterioration
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 Sep 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
(PSD)) and provisions for the
implementation of part D requirements
(New Source Review (NSR) permit
programs); provisions for air pollution
modeling; and provisions for public and
local agency participation in planning
and emission control rule development.
Section 110(a)(2)(D) requires that SIPs
contain certain measures to prevent
sources in a state from significantly
contributing to air quality problems in
another state. To implement this
provision, EPA has required certain
states to establish programs to address
the interstate transport of air pollutants
(e.g., NOX SIP Call,4 CAIR,5 and the
CSAPR). The section 110(a)(2)(D)
requirements for a state are not linked
with a particular nonattainment area’s
designation and classification in that
state. EPA believes that the
requirements linked with a particular
nonattainment area’s designation and
classifications are the relevant measures
to evaluate in reviewing a redesignation
request. The transport SIP submittal
requirements, where applicable,
continue to apply to a state regardless of
the designation of any one particular
area in the state. Thus, EPA does not
believe that the CAA’s interstate
transport requirements should be
construed to be applicable requirements
for purposes of redesignation. However,
as discussed later in this notice,
addressing pollutant transport from
other states is an important part of an
area’s maintenance demonstration.
In addition, EPA believes other
section 110 elements that are neither
connected with nonattainment plan
submissions nor linked with an area’s
attainment status are applicable
4 On October 27, 1998 (63 FR 57356), EPA issued
a NOX SIP Call requiring the District of Columbia
and 22 states to reduce emissions of NOX in order
to reduce the transport of ozone and ozone
precursors. In compliance with EPA’s NOX SIP Call,
North Carolina developed rules governing the
control of NOX emissions from Electric Generating
Units (EGUs), major non-EGU industrial boilers,
major cement kilns, and internal combustion
engines. On December 27, 2002, EPA approved
North Carolina’s rules as fulfilling Phase I (67 FR
78987).
5 On May 12, 2005 (70 FR 25162), EPA
promulgated CAIR which required 28 upwind
States and the District of Columbia to revise their
SIPs to include control measures that would reduce
emissions of SO2 and NOX. Various aspects of CAIR
rule were petitioned in court and on December 23,
2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit remanded CAIR to EPA (see North
Carolina v. EPA, 550 F.3d 1176 (D.C. Cir. 2008))
which left CAIR in place to ‘‘temporarily preserve
the environmental values covered by CAIR’’ until
EPA replaces it with a rule consistent with the
Court’s ruling. The Court directed EPA to remedy
various areas of the rule that were petitioned
consistent with its July 11, 2008 (see North Carolina
v. EPA, 531 F.3d 836 (D.C. Cir., July 11, 2008)),
opinion, but declined to impose a schedule on EPA
for completing that action. Id. Therefore, CAIR is
currently in effect in North Carolina.
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
58215
requirements for purposes of
redesignation. The area will still be
subject to these requirements after the
area is redesignated. The section 110
and part D requirements which are
linked with a particular area’s
designation and classification are the
relevant measures to evaluate in
reviewing a redesignation request. This
approach is consistent with EPA’s
existing policy on applicability (i.e., for
redesignations) of conformity and
oxygenated fuels requirements, as well
as with section 184 ozone transport
requirements. See Reading,
Pennsylvania, proposed and final
rulemakings (61 FR 53174–53176,
October 10, 1996), (62 FR 24826, May 7,
1997); Cleveland-Akron-Loraine, Ohio,
final rulemaking (61 FR 20458, May 7,
1996); and Tampa, Florida, final
rulemaking at (60 FR 62748, December
7, 1995). See also the discussion on this
issue in the Cincinnati, Ohio,
redesignation (65 FR 37890, June 19,
2000), and in the Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania, redesignation (66 FR
50399, October 19, 2001).
EPA has not yet completed
rulemaking on a submittal from North
Carolina dated April 1, 2008, addressing
‘‘infrastructure SIP’’ elements required
under CAA section 110(a)(2). However,
these are statewide requirements that
are not a consequence of the
nonattainment status of the Hickory
Area. As stated above, EPA believes that
section 110 elements not linked to an
area’s nonattainment status are not
applicable for purposes of
redesignation. Therefore,
notwithstanding the fact that EPA has
not yet completed rulemaking on North
Carolina’s submittal for the PM2.5
infrastructure SIP elements of section
110(a)(2), EPA believes it has approved
all SIP elements under section 110 that
must be approved as a prerequisite for
redesignating the Hickory Area to
attainment.
Title I, Part D requirements. EPA
proposes that with approval of North
Carolina’s base year emissions
inventory, which is part of the
maintenance plan submittal, the North
Carolina SIP will meet applicable SIP
requirements under part D of title I of
the CAA. As discussed in greater detail
below, EPA believes the emissions
inventory is approvable because the
2008 direct PM2.5, SO2, and NOX
emissions for North Carolina were
developed consistent with EPA
guidance for emissions inventories and
represent a comprehensive, accurate
and current inventory as required by
section 172(c)(3).
Part D, subpart 1 applicable SIP
requirements. EPA has determined that
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
58216
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
if the approval of the base year
emissions inventories, discussed in
section IX of this rulemaking, is
finalized, the North Carolina SIP will
meet the applicable SIP requirements
for the Hickory Area for purposes of
redesignation under title I, part D of the
CAA. Subpart 1 of part D sets forth the
basic nonattainment requirements
applicable to all nonattainment areas.
All areas that were designated
nonattainment for the 1997 Annual
PM2.5 NAAQS were designated under
this subpart of the CAA, and the
requirements applicable to them are
contained in sections 172 and 176.
For purposes of evaluating this
redesignation request, the applicable
part D, subpart 1 SIP requirements for
all nonattainment areas are contained in
sections 172(c)(1)–(9) and in section
176. A thorough discussion of the
requirements contained in section 172
can be found in the General Preamble
for Implementation of title I (57 FR
13498, April 16, 1992).
Subpart 1 Section 172 Requirements.
Section 172(c)(1) requires the plans for
all nonattainment areas to provide for
the implementation of all reasonably
available control measures (RACM) as
expeditiously as practicable and to
provide for attainment of the national
primary ambient air quality standards.
EPA interprets this requirement to
impose a duty on all nonattainment
areas to consider all available control
measures and to adopt and implement
such measures as are reasonably
available for implementation in each
area as components of the area’s
attainment demonstration. Under
section 172, states with nonattainment
areas must submit plans providing for
timely attainment and meeting a variety
of other requirements. However,
pursuant to 40 CFR 51.1004(c), EPA’s
January 5, 2010, determination that the
Hickory Area was attaining the PM2.5
standard suspended North Carolina’s
obligation to submit most of the
attainment planning requirements that
would otherwise apply. Specifically, the
determination of attainment suspended
North Carolina’s obligation to submit an
attainment demonstration and planning
SIPs to provide for reasonable further
progress (RFP), reasonable available
control measures, and contingency
measures under section 172(c)(9).
The General Preamble for
Implementation of Title I (57 FR 13498,
April 16, 1992) also discusses the
evaluation of these requirements in the
context of EPA’s consideration of a
redesignation request. The General
Preamble sets forth EPA’s view of
applicable requirements for purposes of
evaluating redesignation requests when
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 Sep 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
an area is attaining a standard (General
Preamble for Implementation of Title I
(57 FR 13498, April 16, 1992)).
Because attainment has been reached
in the Hickory Area, no additional
measures are needed to provide for
attainment, and section 172(c)(1)
requirements for an attainment
demonstration and RACM are no longer
considered to be applicable for purposes
of redesignation as long as the Area
continues to attain the standard until
redesignation. See also 40 CFR
51.1004(c).
The RFP plan requirement under
section 172(c)(2) is defined as progress
that must be made toward attainment.
This requirement is not relevant for
purposes of redesignation because EPA
has determined that the Hickory Area
has monitored attainment of the 1997
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS. See General
Preamble, 57 FR 13564. See also 40 CFR
51.1004 (c). In addition, because the
Hickory Area has attained the 1997
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS and is no longer
subject to a RFP requirement, the
requirement to submit the section
172(c)(9) contingency measures is not
applicable for purposes of
redesignation. Id.
Section 172(c)(3) requires submission
and approval of a comprehensive,
accurate, and current inventory of actual
emissions. As part of North Carolina’s
redesignation request for the Hickory
Area, North Carolina submitted a 2008
base year emissions inventory. As
discussed below in section IX, EPA is
proposing to approve the 2008 base year
inventory submitted with the
redesignation request as meeting the
section 172(c)(3) emissions inventory
requirement.
Section 172(c)(4) requires the
identification and quantification of
allowable emissions for major new and
modified stationary sources to be
allowed in an area, and section 172(c)(5)
requires source permits for the
construction and operation of new and
modified major stationary sources
anywhere in the nonattainment area.
EPA has determined that, since PSD
requirements will apply after
redesignation, areas being redesignated
need not comply with the requirement
that a NSR program be approved prior
to redesignation, provided that the area
demonstrates maintenance of the
NAAQS without part D NSR. A more
detailed rationale for this view is
described in a memorandum from Mary
Nichols, Assistant Administrator for Air
and Radiation, dated October 14, 1994,
entitled, ‘‘Part D New Source Review
Requirements for Areas Requesting
Redesignation to Attainment.’’ North
Carolina has demonstrated that the
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Hickory Area will be able to maintain
the NAAQS without part D NSR in
effect and therefore North Carolina need
not have fully approved part D NSR
programs prior to approval of the
redesignation request. Nonetheless,
North Carolina currently has a fullyapproved part D NSR program in place.
North Carolina’s PSD program will
become effective in the Hickory Area
upon redesignation to attainment.
Section 172(c)(6) requires the SIP to
contain control measures necessary to
provide for attainment of the NAAQS.
Because attainment has been reached,
no additional measures are needed to
provide for attainment.
Section 172(c)(7) requires the SIP to
meet the applicable provisions of
section 110(a)(2). As noted above, EPA
believes the North Carolina SIP meets
the requirements of section 110(a)(2)
applicable for purposes of
redesignation.
Section 176 Conformity
Requirements. Section 176(c) of the
CAA requires states to establish criteria
and procedures to ensure that Federally
supported or funded projects conform to
the air quality planning goals in the
applicable SIP. The requirement to
determine conformity applies to
transportation plans, programs and
projects that are developed, funded or
approved under title 23 of the United
States Code (U.S.C.) and the Federal
Transit Act (transportation conformity)
as well as to all other Federally
supported or funded projects (general
conformity). State transportation
conformity SIP revisions must be
consistent with Federal conformity
regulations relating to consultation,
enforcement and enforceability that EPA
promulgated pursuant to its authority
under the CAA.
EPA interprets the conformity SIP
requirements 6 as not applying for
purposes of evaluating a redesignation
request under section 107(d) because
state conformity rules are still required
after redesignation and Federal
conformity rules apply where state rules
have not been approved. See Wall v.
EPA, 265 F.3d 426 (6th Cir.
2001)(upholding this interpretation); see
also 60 FR 62748 (December 7, 1995,
Tampa, Florida). Thus, the Hickory Area
has satisfied all applicable requirements
for purposes of redesignation under
6 CAA Section 176(c)(4)(E) requires states to
submit revisions to their SIPs to reflect certain
Federal criteria and procedures for determining
transportation conformity. Transportation
conformity SIPs are different from the MVEBs that
are established in control strategy SIPs and
maintenance plans.
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
section 110 and part D of title I of the
CAA.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
b. The Hickory Area Has a Fully
Approved Applicable SIP Under Section
110(k) of the CAA
If EPA issues a final approval of the
base year emissions inventories, EPA
will have fully approved the applicable
North Carolina SIP for the Hickory Area
under section 110(k) of the CAA for all
requirements applicable for purposes of
redesignation for the 1997 Annual PM2.5
NAAQS. EPA may rely on prior SIP
approvals in approving a redesignation
request (see Calcagni Memorandum at p.
3; Southwestern Pennsylvania Growth
Alliance v. Browner, 144 F.3d 984, 989–
90 (6th Cir. 1998); Wall, 265 F.3d 426)
plus any additional measures it may
approve in conjunction with a
redesignation action (see 68 FR 25426
(May 12, 2003) and citations therein).
Following passage of the CAA of 1970,
North Carolina has adopted and
submitted, and EPA has fully approved
at various times, provisions addressing
the various 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS
SIP elements applicable in the Hickory
Area (April 17, 1980, 45 FR 26038;
August 27, 1981, 46 FR 43137; October
11, 1985, 50 FR 41501; November 19,
1986, 51 FR 41786; and December 19,
1986, 51 FR 45468).
As indicated above, EPA believes that
the section 110 elements that are neither
connected with nonattainment plan
submissions nor linked to an area’s
nonattainment status are not applicable
requirements for purposes of
redesignation. In addition, EPA believes
that since the part D subpart 1
requirements did not become due prior
to submission of the redesignation
request, they are also not applicable
requirements for purposes of
redesignation. Sierra Club v. EPA, 375
F.3d 537 (7th Cir. 2004); 68 FR 25424,
25427 (May 12, 2003) (redesignation of
the St. Louis-East St. Louis Area to
attainment of the 1-hour ozone
NAAQS). With the approval of the
emissions inventory, EPA will have
approved all Part D subpart 1
requirements applicable for purposes of
this redesignation.
Criteria (3)—The Air Quality
Improvement in the Hickory Area 1997
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS Nonattainment
Area Is Due to Permanent and
Enforceable Reductions in Emissions
Resulting From Implementation of the
SIP and Applicable Federal Air
Pollution Control Regulations and Other
Permanent and Enforceable Reductions
For redesignating a nonattainment
area to attainment, the CAA requires
EPA to determine that the air quality
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 Sep 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
improvement in the area is due to
permanent and enforceable reductions
in emissions resulting from
implementation of the SIP and
applicable Federal air pollution control
regulations and other permanent and
enforceable reductions (CAA section
107(d)(3)(E)(iii)). EPA believes North
Carolina has demonstrated that the
observed air quality improvement in the
Hickory Area is due to permanent and
enforceable reductions resulting from
implementation of the SIP, Federal
measures, and other state adopted
measures.
Fine particulate matter, or PM2.5,
refers to airborne particles less than or
equal to 2.5 micrometers in diameter.
Although treated as a single pollutant,
fine particles come from many different
sources and are composed of many
different compounds. One of the largest
components of PM2.5 in the southeastern
United States is sulfate, which is formed
through various chemical reactions from
the precursor SO2. The other major
component of PM2.5 is organic carbon,
which originates predominantly from
biogenic emission sources. Nitrate,
which is formed from the precursor
NOX, is also a component of PM2.5.
Crustal materials from windblown dust
and elemental carbon from combustion
sources are less significant contributors
to total PM2.5.
State and Federal measures enacted in
recent years have resulted in permanent
emission reductions. Most of these
emission reductions are enforceable
through regulations. A few nonregulatory measures also result in
emission reductions.
The Federal measures that have been
implemented include:
Tier 2 vehicle standards. In addition
to requiring NOX controls, the Tier 2
rule reduced the allowable sulfur
content of gasoline to 30 parts per
million (ppm) starting in January of
2006. Most gasoline sold in North
Carolina prior to this had a sulfur
content of approximately 300 ppm.
Heavy-duty gasoline and diesel
highway vehicle standards. The second
phase of the standards and testing
procedures, which began in 2007,
reduces particulate matter (PM) and
NOX from heavy-duty highway engines
and also reduces highway diesel fuel
sulfur content to 15 ppm. The total
program is expected to achieve a 90 and
95 percent reduction in PM and NOX
emissions from heavy-duty highway
engines, respectively.
Nonroad spark-ignition engines and
recreational engines standards. Tier 1 of
this standard, implemented in 2004, and
Tier 2, implemented in 2007, have
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
58217
reduced and will continue to reduce PM
emissions.
Large nonroad diesel engine
standards. Promulgated in 2004, this
rule is being phased in between 2008
and 2014. This rule will reduce sulfur
content in nonroad diesel fuel and,
when fully implemented, will reduce
NOX and direct PM2.5 emissions by over
90 percent from these engines.
CAIR and the Cross-State Air
Pollution Rule (CSAPR). As previously
discussed, the remanded CAIR,
originally promulgated to reduce
transported pollution, was left in place
to ‘‘temporarily preserve the
environmental values covered by CAIR’’
until EPA replaced it with a rule
consistent with the Court’s opinion. To
remedy CAIR’s flaws, EPA promulgated
the final CSAPR on August 8, 2011.
CSAPR addresses the interstate
transport requirements of the CAA with
respect to the 1997 ozone, 1997 PM2.5
and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. As noted
previously, the requirements of CAIR
address emissions thru the 2011 control
period and CSAPR requires similar or
greater emission reductions in the
relevant areas in 2012 and beyond.
The state measures that have been
implemented to date and relied upon by
North Carolina to demonstrate
attainment and/or maintenance include:
NCCSA. The primary state-adopted
measure is the NCCSA, enacted in June
2002. The NCCSA includes a schedule
of system-wide caps on emissions of
NOX and SO2, the first of which became
effective in 2007, and has no provision
for the trading of pollution credits from
one utility to another. According to
North Carolina, this rule requires coalfired power plants in the State to reduce
annual NOX emissions from 245,000
tons in 1998 to 56,000 tons by 2009 (a
77 percent reduction) and to reduce
annual SO2 emissions from 489,000 tons
in 1998 to 250,000 tons by 2009 (a 49
percent reduction), and further SO2
reductions to 130,000 tons in 2013 (a 73
percent reduction). Although there are
no power plants located within the
Hickory Area, there are power plants
located around the Area. On August 21,
2009, North Carolina submitted a SIP
revision to incorporate specific
provisions of the NCCSA into the
Federally approved SIP. On June 22,
2011, EPA proposed approval of the
NCCSA rules as a revision to the SIP
and expects to take final action on it in
a rulemaking separate from today’s
proposed action but prior to any final
action on this redesignation.
Another significant rulemaking which
has led to permanent and enforceable
reductions is the NOX SIP Call rule.
This rule was predicted to reduce
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
58218
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
summertime NOX emissions from power
plants and other industries by over 60
percent in North Carolina by 2006. See
Table III–5 of NOX SIP Call, 63 FR
57356, 57434 (October 27, 1998). These
emission reductions are state and
Federally enforceable.
Table 2 presents the annual emissions
from North Carolina sources as recorded
in EPA’s acid rain database. Since 2002,
when the NOX controls started coming
on-line to meet the NOX SIP Call, and
later to meet the NCCSA, the annual
NOX emissions from subject sources
have decreased dramatically from
145,706 tons per year (tpy) in 2002 to
61,669 tpy in 2008. In 2009 the
emissions decreased to 44,506 tpy—
down more than 69 percent from 2002.
Between 2005 and 2008, the annual SO2
emissions from the utilities in North
Carolina decreased by more than half
from 500,936 tpy to 227,030 tpy, or
nearly 274,000 tons reduced. In 2009
the emissions were again halved, down
76 percent from 2002. The decline in
SO2 emissions has coincided with a
decline in annual PM2.5 concentrations
across North Carolina.
TABLE 2—ANNUAL EMISSIONS FROM ALL NC SOURCES IN THE EPA CLEAN AIR MARKETS DATABASE
Annual SO2
emissions (tons)
Year
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Annual NOX
emissions (tons)
462,993
462,041
472,320
500,936
462,143
370,827
227,030
110,948
145,706
135,879
124,079
114,300
108,584
64,770
61,669
44,506
.................................................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................................................
Other state measures have been
implemented that are state enforceable
but not a part of the Federallyenforceable SIP. Such measures
contribute to reductions in pollutant
emissions, although to a lesser extent
than the ones identified above, and
include the following:
Clean Air Bill. This state legislation
expanded the inspection and
maintenance program from 9 counties to
48 counties and was phased in for the
Hickory Area from July 1, 2002, through
July 1, 2003. This program reduces NOX,
VOC, and carbon monoxide (CO)
emissions.
Open burning. This regulation,
originally approved in 1997, prohibits
the burning of man-made materials
throughout the State. Additionally, this
regulation prohibits open burning of
yard waste in areas for which the DAQ
forecasts an air quality action day. The
open burning regulation will reduce
PM2.5 emissions, as well as NOX, VOC
and CO emissions.
Diesel Retrofits. As part of the North
Carolina Mobile Source Emission
Reduction Grants program, a number of
cities, counties and school districts have
installed diesel oxidation catalysts or
diesel particulate filters on their diesel
equipment. The vehicles that have been
retrofitted include school buses and
county fleet trucks used for solid waste
pickup. These types of filters are
designed to reduce PM engine
emissions, and when used with ultra
low sulfur diesel fuel, NOX and VOC
emissions are also reduced. Even though
these emission reductions are voluntary
and not enforceable, they are still
considered permanent reductions.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 Sep 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
Diesel Emissions Reduction Act
(DERA). DERA provides new diesel
emissions reduction grant authority for
EPA. This funding is used to achieve
significant reductions in diesel
emissions that improve air quality and
protect public health. The DERA funds
that the DAQ has received have been
used to retrofit, repower, or replace
existing diesel engines from on-road and
nonroad mobile source vehicles and
equipment. This program will reduce
PM, NOX, and VOC emissions. Even
though these emission reductions are
voluntary, they are still considered
permanent reductions once a retrofit is
completed. To date, North Carolina has
retrofitted over 6,000 diesel school
buses. In addition to impacting local
emissions in the nonattainment area,
most of these measures impact
emissions statewide.
EPA agrees with North Carolina’s
assessment that, although PM2.5 and
PM2.5 precursor reductions within the
nonattainment area have contributed to
improved air quality, the majority of the
improvement in ambient PM2.5
concentrations has resulted from
reductions in SO2 emissions from instate coal-fired power plants due to the
NCCSA. The annual emissions from
these facilities have significantly
decreased since 2005, with over 250,000
tons of SO2 emission reductions in 2008
compared to 2005. EPA’s analysis of
emissions data available in from the
Clean Air Markets Division Web site
(https://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/) shows
that the statewide reductions in SO2
emissions are much greater than any
decreases in emissions that can be
attributed to decreases in demand
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
associated with reductions in operating
hours or heat inputs at North Carolina
power plants. While coal-fired electric
power generation in North Carolina
decreased 4.8 percent from 2005 to
2008,7 SO2 emissions from coal-fired
electric power plants declined 46.0
percent during the same period.
The NCCSA reductions took place
beginning in 2006, the first year of the
3-year attainment period submitted by
North Carolina for redesignation of the
Hickory Area. Since the final
compliance date for the NCCSA SO2
emissions caps is 2013, future design
values are expected to continue to
decline below the 2006–2008 attaining
design values. The significant statewide
reductions in utility SO2 emissions will
be permanent and enforceable upon
EPA’s approval of the NCCSA rules into
the North Carolina SIP. Further, EPA
does not have any information to
suggest that the decrease in ambient
PM2.5 concentrations in the Hickory
Area is due to unusually favorable
meteorological conditions. Additionally,
the emission reductions resulting from
the NCCSA discussed above are of a
greater magnitude than any influence
that could be expected from
meteorology. The 250,000 tons of SO2
emission reductions since 2005
represents a greater than 41 percent
reduction of statewide SO2 emissions. It
is reasonable to expect that such
significant reductions have reduced
ambient PM2.5 levels throughout the
State—including in the Hickory Area.
Indeed, every PM2.5 monitor in the State
7 Electric Power Annual 2009, DOE/EIA–
0348(2009), North Carolina Electricity Profile,
Tables 5 and 7. April 2011.
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
58219
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
has shown a consistent downward trend
during the period from 2006–2009.8
Criteria (4)—The Hickory Area Has a
Fully Approved Maintenance Plan
Pursuant to Section 175A of the CAA
For redesignating a nonattainment
area to attainment, the CAA requires
EPA to determine that the area has a
fully approved maintenance plan
pursuant to section 175A of the CAA
(CAA section 107(d)(3)(E)(iv)). In
conjunction with its request to
redesignate the Hickory Area to
attainment for the 1997 Annual PM2.5
NAAQS, DAQ submitted a SIP revision
to provide for the maintenance of the
1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS for at least
10 years after the effective date of
redesignation to attainment. EPA
believes this maintenance plan meets
the requirements for approval under
section 175A of the CAA.
a. What is required in a maintenance
plan?
Section 175A of the CAA sets forth
the elements of a maintenance plan for
areas seeking redesignation from
nonattainment to attainment. Under
section 175A, the plan must
demonstrate continued attainment of
the applicable NAAQS for at least 10
years after the Administrator approves a
redesignation to attainment. Eight years
after the redesignation, the State must
submit a revised maintenance plan
which demonstrates that attainment will
continue to be maintained for the 10
years following the initial 10-year
period. To address the possibility of
future NAAQS violations, the
maintenance plan must contain
contingency measures as EPA deems
necessary to assure prompt correction of
any future 1997 Annual PM2.5
violations. The Calcagni Memorandum
provides further guidance on the
content of a maintenance plan,
explaining that a maintenance plan
should address five requirements: the
attainment emissions inventory,
maintenance demonstration,
monitoring, verification of continued
attainment, and a contingency plan. As
is discussed more fully below, EPA
finds that North Carolina’s maintenance
plan includes all the necessary
components and is thus proposing to
approve it as a revision to the North
Carolina SIP, provided that EPA takes
final action to approve the NCCSA
rules.
b. Attainment Emissions Inventory
The Hickory Area first attained the
1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS based on
monitoring data for the 3-year period
2006–2008. North Carolina selected
2008 as the attainment emissions
inventory year in part because it was
already in the process of developing
some emissions inventory data for this
year. The attainment inventory
identifies a level of emissions in the
Area that is sufficient to attain the 1997
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS. North Carolina
began development of the attainment
inventory by first generating a baseline
emissions inventory for the Hickory
Area. As noted above, the year 2008 was
chosen as the base year for developing
a comprehensive emissions inventory
for primary PM2.5, SO2, and NOX, for
which projected emissions could be
developed for 2011, 2014, 2017, and
2021. In addition to comparing the final
year of the plan, 2021, to the base year,
2008, North Carolina compared interim
years to the 2008 baseline to
demonstrate that these years are also
expected to show continued
maintenance of the annual PM2.5
standard.
The emissions inventories are
composed of four major types of
sources: point, area, on-road mobile,
and non-road mobile. The future year
emissions inventories have been
estimated using projected rates of
growth in population, traffic, economic
activity, expected control programs, and
other parameters. Non-road mobile
emissions estimates were based on the
EPA’s NONROAD2008, a non-road
mobile model, with the exception of
railroad locomotive and aircraft engine
emissions. The railroad locomotive and
aircraft engine emissions were estimated
by taking activity data, such as landings
and takeoffs, and multiplying by an
emission factor. On-road mobile source
emissions were calculated using EPA’s
MOVES mobile emission factors model.
The 2008 SO2, NOX and PM2.5 emissions
for the Hickory Area, as well as the
emissions for other years, were
developed consistent with EPA
guidance and are summarized in Tables
3 and 4 of the following subsection
discussing the maintenance
demonstration.
c. Maintenance Demonstration
The December 18, 2009, final
submittal and December 22, 2010,
supplement included a maintenance
plan for the Hickory Area. This
demonstration:
(i) Shows compliance with and
maintenance of the annual PM2.5
standard by providing information to
support the demonstration that current
and future emissions of SO2, NOx and
PM2.5 remain at or below 2008 SO2,
NOX, and PM2.5 emissions levels.
(ii) Uses 2008 as the attainment year
and includes future emission inventory
projections for 2011, 2014, 2017, and
2021, as shown in Tables 3 and 4 below.
(iii) Identifies an ‘‘out year’’ at least 10
years (and beyond) after the time
necessary for EPA to review and
approve the maintenance plan. Per 40
CFR part 93, NOX MVEBs were
established for the last year (2021) of the
maintenance plan.9 Additionally, North
Carolina chose, through interagency
consultation, to establish NOX MVEBs
for 2011 (see section VII below).
(iv) Provides, as shown in Table 4
below, the actual and projected
emissions inventories, in tpy, for the
Hickory Area.
TABLE 3—ACTUAL AND PROJECTED NOX, SO2, AND PM2.5 EMISSIONS FROM ALL SOURCE CATEGORIES FOR CATAWBA
COUNTY IN THE HICKORY AREA (TPY)
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
2008
2011
2014
2017
2021
NOX
Point ......................................................................................................................
Area ......................................................................................................................
On-road Mobile .....................................................................................................
Non-road Mobile ...................................................................................................
13310
662
4982
1173
10549
614
4005
922
10548
566
3240
700
10548
520
2591
551
10548
454
2054
453
Total ...............................................................................................................
20127
16090
15054
14210
13509
SO2
8 https://www.epa.gov/airtrends/values.html.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 Sep 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
9 PM
2.5 MVEBs are not required for the Hickory
Area due to the insignificance determination for the
motor vehicle PM2.5 contribution.
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
58220
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 3—ACTUAL AND PROJECTED NOX, SO2, AND PM2.5 EMISSIONS FROM ALL SOURCE CATEGORIES FOR CATAWBA
COUNTY IN THE HICKORY AREA (TPY)—Continued
2008
2011
2014
2017
2021
Point ......................................................................................................................
Area ......................................................................................................................
On-road Mobile .....................................................................................................
Non-road Mobile ...................................................................................................
6189
2263
35
18
6187
2037
20
6
6186
1808
18
4
6184
1580
19
3
6183
1277
20
4
Total ...............................................................................................................
PM2.5
Point ......................................................................................................................
Area ......................................................................................................................
On-road Mobile .....................................................................................................
Non-road Mobile ...................................................................................................
8505
8250
8016
7786
7484
6976
682
166
70
6975
658
127
67
6975
629
107
57
6973
606
89
46
6971
559
73
38
Total ...............................................................................................................
7894
7827
7768
7714
7641
TABLE 4—EMISSIONS AND MAINTENANCE SUMMARY FOR THE HICKORY PM2.5 NONATTAINMENT AREA
Year
NOX (tpy)
SO2 (tpy)
20,127
16,090
15,054
14,210
13,509
¥6,618
8,505
8,250
8,016
7,786
7,484
¥1,021
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
2008 .....................................................................................................................................................................
2011 .....................................................................................................................................................................
2014 .....................................................................................................................................................................
2017 .....................................................................................................................................................................
2021 .....................................................................................................................................................................
Difference from 2008 to 2021 ..............................................................................................................................
Tables 3 and 4 summarize the 2008
and future projected emissions of direct
PM2.5 and precursors from the counties
in the Hickory Area. In situations where
local emissions are the primary
contributor to nonattainment, the
ambient air quality standard should not
be violated in the future as long as
emissions from within the
nonattainment area remain at or below
the baseline with which attainment was
achieved. In the Hickory Area, however,
the preponderance of the nonattainment
problem is due to SO2 emissions from
power plants outside the nonattainment
area, but within North Carolina. As
shown by the speciation data in the
State’s submittal,10 sulfates are one of
the largest contributors to ambient PM2.5
in the Hickory Area and in the State as
a whole, contributing about 30 percent
of the total PM2.5 mass. Sulfates are
formed through various SO2 reactions in
the atmosphere. According to EPA’s
National Emissions Inventory for 2005
and Clean Air Markets Division acid
rain database, over 90 percent of SO2
emissions in North Carolina were from
stationary point sources, greater than 80
percent of which were from power
plants reporting to the acid rain
program.11 Organic carbon, which also
10 SIP
submittal figures 2–2 and 4–1.
National Emissions Inventory data is
available on the Web site: https://www.epa.gov/ttn/
chief/eiinformation.html. The acid rain database
can be accessed on EPA’s Clean Air Markets
11 EPA’s
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 Sep 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
contributes about 30 percent of the total
PM2.5 mass in the Hickory Area, is
predominately attributed to biogenic
emission sources. The next largest
contributor in the Hickory Area is an
‘‘other’’ group that is attributed to water,
sea salts, and other trace materials and
which accounts for about 17 percent of
the mass.
Because the most significant sources
contributing to ambient PM2.5 levels in
the Hickory Area are utilities located
outside the nonattainment area, but
within North Carolina, reductions in
emissions from these point sources
provide the greatest potential for
reductions in ambient PM2.5
concentrations. For this reason, the
State presented information in its
submittal (as discussed above in the
section on permanent and enforceable
reductions) showing that the NCCSA
requires these sources to reduce their
emissions by substantial amounts that
are more than sufficient for the Hickory
Area to demonstrate attainment and
maintenance of the PM2.5 NAAQS at
issue here. EPA has proposed
rulemaking action to approve specific
provisions of the NCCSA into the North
Carolina SIP, and final approval would
assure that power plants within North
Carolina will remain sufficiently
regulated to provide for continued
Division Web site: https://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/
.
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
PM2.5
(tpy)
7,894
7,827
7,768
7,714
7,641
¥253
maintenance as required by CAA
section 175A.
With regard to emissions generated
outside North Carolina which have the
potential to impact the Hickory Area,
EPA notes several recent emissions
reductions that have occurred or will
occur in nearby states. First, On April
14, 2011, EPA announced a settlement
with the Tennessee Valley Authority
(TVA) to resolve alleged Clean Air Act
violations at 11 of its coal-fired plants
in Alabama, Kentucky, and
Tennessee.12 The settlement will
require TVA to invest a TVA estimated
$3 billion to $5 billion on new and
upgraded state-of-the-art pollution
controls. When fully implemented, the
pollution controls and other required
actions will address 92 percent of TVA’s
coal-fired power plant capacity,
reducing emissions of NOX by 69
percent and SO2 by 67 percent from
TVA’s 2008 emission levels. The
settlement will also significantly reduce
particulate matter and carbon dioxide
(CO2) emissions. The consent decree
also requires that operation of 18 coalfired units at the Johnsonville, John
Sevier, and Widows Creek plants be
phased out by 2017.
Second, the State of Georgia has
recently passed a multi-pollutant rule to
reduce NOX and SO2 emissions from
12 Alabama, et al. v. TVA, No. 3:11–CV–00170,
(E.D. TN 2011) (Consent Decree), available at http:
//www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/decrees/civil/
caa/tvacoal-fired-cd.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
many of its coal-fired EGUs.13 Third, the
consent decrees for Dominion Power 14
and American Electric Power (AEP) 15 in
the Commonwealth of Virginia require
further controls of NOX and SO2
emissions at those power plants. On
April 21, 2003, the Department of
Justice and EPA announced a settlement
against Virginia Electric and Power
Company (VEPCO a subsidiary of
Dominion Resources, Inc.). This
settlement requires VEPCO, one of the
nation’s largest coal-fired electric
utilities, to install new pollution control
equipment and to upgrade existing
controls on several units in its system,
thus resulting in substantial air
pollution reductions. The settlement
covers eight VEPCO plants, six in
Virginia and two in West Virginia,
comprising twenty electricity-generating
units. These eight plants emitted over
350,000 tons of SO2 and NOX in 2000.
The settlement will reduce these
emissions to approximately 86,500 tpy
SO2 and 26,000 tpy NOX. On October 9,
2007, the United States, along with eight
individual states and thirteen citizen
groups, announced a settlement
agreement with AEP that that mandates
emissions reductions at sixteen of AEP’s
coal-fired power plants (46 units)
located in Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio,
Virginia, and West Virginia. NOX
emissions from subject plants will be
reduced by greater than 68 percent by
2016 as compared to 2006 levels.
Likewise, by 2018 SO2 emissions will
decrease by greater than 78 percent as
compared to 2006 levels.
Finally, EPA has recently finalized
the CSAPR to regulate interstate
transport of power plant emissions.
EPA’s modeling for the final rule
indicates that the Hickory Area would
maintain the NAAQS into the future in
the absence of the rule. The 2012 base
case run, which simulates air quality
without CAIR and without a transport
rule, assumes a 4 million ton increase in
SO2 regionally. A 2014 base case run
also assumes no CAIR, but does include
additional enforceable controls that are
required to occur between 2012 and
2014. Based on these modeling
assessments, PM2.5 concentrations in the
13 Georgia Rule 391–3–1–.02(2)(uuu), ‘‘SO
2
Emissions from Electric Utility Steam Generating
Units,’’ was first adopted by the Georgia Board of
Natural Resources January 28, 2009, with an
amendment adopted June 24, 2009.
14 U.S. et al. v. Va. Elec. & Power Co., No. 1:03–
cv–00517–LMB (E.D. Va. 2003) (Consent Decree),
available at https://www.epa.gov/compliance/
resources/decrees/civil/caa/vepcocd.pdf.
15 U.S. et al. v. American Elec. Power Serv. Corp.,
No C2–99–1250 (E.D. Ohio 2007) (Consent Decree),
available at https://www.epa.gov/compliance/
resources/decrees/civil/caa/americanelectricpowercd.pdf.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 Sep 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
Hickory Area are still projected to
decrease to 12.9 μg/m3 in 2012 and 12.1
μg/m3 in 2014. Though not necessary for
demonstrating attainment and
maintenance in the Hickory Area, the
final CSAPR will result in additional
reductions of NOX and SO2 emissions
that cross state lines. EPA estimates that
by 2014, power plants in the covered
states will reduce annual emissions of
SO2 by about 2.2 million tons beyond
what would have been achieved at that
time under CAIR. By 2014, we estimate
that NOX emissions in covered states
will be about 500,000 tons lower than
emissions would have been under CAIR.
Based on the analysis described
above, EPA has concluded that impacts
on air quality from emissions
transported across state lines have been
adequately addressed for the Hickory
Area and that the Hickory Area will
maintain the annual PM2.5 standard
through 2021. Furthermore, the final
CSAPR mandates even greater
reductions than have already occurred
and, more importantly, any reductions
in PM2.5 in the Hickory Area from the
final CSAPR will be in excess of those
needed to maintain the Annual PM2.5
NAAQS.
A maintenance plan requires the state
to show that projected future year
emissions will not exceed the level of
emissions which led the Area to attain
the NAAQS. North Carolina has
projected emissions as described
previously and determined that
emissions in the Hickory Area will
remain below those in the attainment
year inventory until 2021.
As discussed further in section VII of
this proposed rulemaking, a safety
margin is the difference between the
attainment level of emissions (from all
sources) and the projected level of
emissions (from all sources) in the
maintenance plan. The attainment level
of emissions is the level of emissions
during one of the years in which the
Area met the NAAQS. North Carolina
has decided to allocate a portion of the
available safety margin to the Area’s
NOX MVEBs for 2011 and 2021 for the
Hickory Area and has calculated the
safety margin in its submittal.
Specifically, a total of 363,327 kg/year 16
(400 tpy) and 372,671 kg/year (411 tpy)
of the available NOX safety margins are
allocated to the 2011 and 2021 MVEB,
respectively. The remaining safety
margins for NOX are 3,637 tpy and 6,207
tpy for 2011 and 2021, respectively.
This allocation and the resulting
available safety margin for the Hickory
16 Conversion factor from grams to tons = 907185
grams per ton.
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
58221
Area are discussed further in section VII
of this proposed rulemaking.
d. Monitoring Network
There are currently three monitors
measuring PM2.5 in the Hickory Area.
The State of North Carolina, through
DAQ, has committed to continue
operation of the monitors in the Hickory
Area in compliance with 40 CFR part 58
and have thus addressed the
requirement for monitoring. EPA
approved North Carolina’s 2010
monitoring plan on September 22, 2010.
e. Verification of Continued Attainment
The State of North Carolina, through
DAQ, has the legal authority to enforce
and implement the requirements of the
Hickory Area 1997 Annual PM2.5
Maintenance plan. This includes the
authority to adopt, implement and
enforce any subsequent emissions
control contingency measures
determined to be necessary to correct
future PM2.5 attainment problems.
DAQ will track the progress of the
maintenance plan by performing future
reviews of triennial emission
inventories for the Hickory Area using
the latest emissions factors, models and
methodologies. For these periodic
inventories, DAQ will review the
assumptions made for the purpose of
the maintenance demonstration
concerning projected growth of activity
levels. If any of these assumptions
appear to have changed substantially,
the DAQ will re-project emissions for
the Hickory Area.
f. Contingency Measures in the
Maintenance Plan
The contingency measures are
designed to promptly correct a violation
of the NAAQS that occurs after
redesignation. Section 175A of the CAA
requires that a maintenance plan
include such contingency measures as
EPA deems necessary to assure that the
state will promptly correct a violation of
the NAAQS that occurs after
redesignation. The maintenance plan
should identify the contingency
measures to be adopted, a schedule and
procedure for adoption and
implementation, and a time limit for
action by the state. A state should also
identify specific indicators to be used to
determine when the contingency
measures need to be implemented. The
maintenance plan must include a
requirement that a state will implement
all measures with respect to control of
the pollutant that were contained in the
SIP before redesignation of the area to
attainment in accordance with section
175A(d).
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
58222
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
In the December 18, 2009, submittal,
North Carolina affirms that all programs
instituted by the State and EPA for PM
control will remain enforceable and that
sources are prohibited from reducing
emissions controls following the
redesignation of the Area. The
contingency plan included in the
December 18, 2009, submittal includes
a 3-step triggering mechanism to
determine when contingency measures
are needed and a process of developing
and implementing appropriate control
measures. The secondary and tertiary
triggers are pre-violation triggers and
thus activation does not necessarily
mean a violation of the actual annual
PM2.5 NAAQS has occurred or will
occur. The pre-violation triggers allow
the State to begin evaluating the causes
of increased ambient PM2.5
concentrations and take corrective
action to prevent a future violation. In
the contingency plan, North Carolina
has committed to taking action on the
activation of a primary or secondary
trigger. These triggers and the actions
resulting from them are discussed more
fully below.
The primary trigger will occur when
the certified 3-year average of the
average annual ambient concentration is
greater than 15.0 μg/m3 at any monitor
in the maintenance area. The resulting
trigger date will be 60 days after the date
that the State observes an annual
average concentration that, when
averaged with the previous two annual
average PM2.5 concentrations, would
result in a 3-year design value greater
than 15.0 μg/m3. North Carolina has
identified a secondary warning trigger to
occur when the State finds that the
rolling twelve-quarter average
monitored PM2.5 levels exceed the PM2.5
NAAQS in the Hickory Area (noncalendar year basis). The trigger date
will be 60 days from the date that the
State observes that the rolling 12-quarter
average is greater than 15.0 μg/m3. A
tertiary (third type of) trigger will be
activated when a monitor in the Hickory
Area has an annual average greater than
15.0 μg/m3. In addition to the triggers
indicated above, North Carolina will
track regional emissions submitted
annually for large sources or every three
years for other sources through the
Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule
and Air Emissions Reporting Rule and
compare them to the projected
inventories and attainment year
inventory. North Carolina commits to
review theses emissions inventories and
evaluate assumptions made to project
emissions in the maintenance plan to
determine if unexpected growth in NOX,
SO2 or PM2.5 in the Area will jeopardize
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 Sep 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
maintenance of the 1997 Annual PM2.5
NAAQS.
Once a primary or secondary trigger is
activated, DAQ will commence analysis,
including trajectory analysis, and
emissions inventory assessment to
determine emission control measures
that will be required to attain or
maintain the 1997 Annual PM2.5
NAAQS. PM2.5 speciation data from the
speciation trends network monitors will
also be reviewed to help determine
which control measures would be most
effective. If it is determined that the
violation or exceedance of the PM2.5
NAAQS is due to sources outside of
North Carolina, then DAQ will consult
with EPA on its findings and
determinations on what contingency
measures will be implemented to reduce
emissions. If EPA and DAQ agree that
the violation or exceedance was due to
sources outside of North Carolina, DAQ
will consult with regulatory authorities
from contributing up-wind sources to
determine additional actions to be
implemented.17
If DAQ determines that a violation or
exceedance occurred due to sources
within North Carolina, then by
November 1 of the year following the
year which caused the primary or
secondary trigger activation, the State
will complete sufficient analysis to
begin adoption of necessary rules for
ensuring attainment and maintenance of
the annual PM2.5 NAAQS. If the rules
are still needed, they would become
State effective within 7 months after the
November 1 analysis (by the following
July 1), unless legislative review is
required. Each adopted rule will include
a schedule that will require compliance
with the rule no later than 2 years after
adoption of the rule.
At least one of the following
contingency measures will be adopted
and implemented upon a primary or
secondary triggering event:
• Continued implementation of
previously adopted controls (NCCSA
and diesel retrofits) which have not yet
been realized but are sufficient to
address the violation (and in excess of
emissions reductions considered for
maintenance);
• Reasonably Available Control
Technology on stationary sources in the
Hickory Area;
17 In a letter dated May 20, 2011, North Carolina
provided additional clarification on the timing and
content of their contingency plan. In the letter,
North Carolina clarified that it is there intent to take
corrective measures to address a violation of the
1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS within 18–24 months
of the violation. This letter is available in the docket
EPA–R04–OAR–2009–1011 on the https://
www.regulations.gov Web site.
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• Diesel inspection and maintenance
program; 18
• Implementation of diesel retrofit
programs, including incentives for
performing retrofits;
• Additional controls in upwind
areas within North Carolina.
When a tertiary trigger is activated,
DAQ will commence analyses including
meteorological evaluation, trajectory
analyses, and emissions inventory
assessment to understand why an
annual exceedance of the standard has
occurred. DAQ will work with the local
air awareness program and develop an
outreach plan to identify any additional
voluntary measures that can be
implemented and implement the plan
during the following summer.
As designed, a tertiary trigger will
always occur before a primary trigger
because it is based on an annual
average, whereas the primary trigger is
based on an average of three consecutive
annual averages. This means DAQ will
commence analyzing the cause of higher
ambient PM2.5 levels in the Area well
before an actual NAAQS violation
occurs. Further, a secondary trigger is
likely to occur before a primary trigger
because it is determined at the end of
each calendar quarter based on a rolling
12-quarter average. This means that if
the Area were to experience a NAAQS
violation, DAQ will have likely already
commenced the process for adoption of
control measures as described above.
EPA is now making the preliminary
determination that the contingency
measures outlined above in North
Carolina’s contingency plan are
adequate and ensure that the State will
promptly correct any future violation of
the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS in the
Hickory Area.
EPA has concluded that the Hickory
Area maintenance plan adequately
addresses the five basic components of
a maintenance plan: Attainment
inventory, maintenance demonstration,
monitoring network, verification of
continued attainment, and a
contingency plan. Provided that EPA
takes final rulemaking to approve the
NCCSA, the maintenance plan SIP
revision submitted by the State of North
18 At this time, there is not an approved method
for determining emission reductions from a Diesel
Inspection and Maintenance program. Therefore,
there is no technical basis to award emission credits
for a heavy duty diesel inspection and maintenance
program in the SIP. However, we do not want to
preclude future technical changes that may make
awarding such emission credits possible. If it is
necessary to implement contingency measures for
this area, North Carolina, in coordination with EPA,
will evaluate the feasibility of this program as a
contingency measure at that time. If a technical
basis for emission credits is not available, other
contingency measures will need to be implemented.
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Carolina for the Hickory Area meets the
requirements of section 175A of the
CAA and is approvable.
VII. What Is EPA’s Analysis of North
Carolina’s Proposed Direct PM2.5
Insignificance Determination and the
Proposed NOX MVEBs for the Hickory
Area?
Under section 176(c) of the CAA, new
transportation plans, programs, and
projects, such as the construction of
new highways, must ‘‘conform’’ to (i.e.,
be consistent with) the part of the state’s
air quality plan that addresses pollution
from cars and trucks. Conformity to the
SIP means that transportation activities
will not cause new air quality
violations, worsen existing violations, or
delay timely attainment of the NAAQS
or any interim milestones. If a
transportation plan does not conform,
most new projects that would expand
the capacity of roadways cannot go
forward. Regulations at 40 CFR part 93
set forth EPA policy, criteria, and
procedures for demonstrating and
assuring conformity of such
transportation activities to a SIP. The
regional emissions analysis is one, but
not the only, requirement for
implementing transportation
conformity. Transportation conformity
is a requirement for nonattainment and
maintenance areas. Maintenance areas
are areas that were previously
nonattainment for a particular NAAQS
but have since been redesignated to
attainment with an approved
maintenance plan for that NAAQS.
Under the CAA, states are required to
submit, at various times, control strategy
SIPs and maintenance plans for
nonattainment areas. These control
strategy SIPs (including RFP and
attainment demonstration) and
maintenance plans create MVEBs for
criteria pollutants and/or their
precursors to address pollution from
cars and trucks. Per 40 CFR part 93, an
MVEB must be established for the last
year of the maintenance plan. A state
may adopt MVEBs for other years as
well. The MVEB is the portion of the
total allowable emissions in the
maintenance demonstration that is
allocated to highway and transit vehicle
use and emissions. See 40 CFR 93.101.
The MVEB serves as a ceiling on
emissions from an area’s planned
transportation system. The MVEB
concept is further explained in the
preamble to the November 24, 1993,
Transportation Conformity Rule (58 FR
62188). The preamble also describes
how to establish the MVEB in the SIP
and how to revise the MVEB.
Today’s actions address two related
elements regarding on-road motor
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 Sep 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
vehicle emissions and the requirement
to establish MVEBs. First, EPA is
proposing to find that the direct PM2.5
emission contribution from motor
vehicles to PM2.5 pollution in the
Hickory Area is insignificant. The result
of this determination, if finalized, is that
North Carolina will not need to develop
an MVEB for direct PM2.5 for the
Hickory Area and the MPO will not
need to perform a regional emissions
analysis for direct PM2.5 when it
demonstrates conformity. See below for
further information on the
insignificance determination. Second,
EPA is proposing to approve the NOX
MVEBs for the Hickory Area.
Direct PM2.5 insignificance. For motor
vehicle emissions budgets to be
approvable, they must meet, at a
minimum, EPA’s adequacy criteria (40
CFR 93.118(e)(4)). In certain instances,
the Transportation Conformity Rule
allows areas to forgo establishment of an
MVEB where it is demonstrated that the
regional motor vehicle emissions for a
particular pollutant or precursor are an
insignificant contributor to the air
quality problem in an area. The general
criteria for insignificance
determinations can be found in 40 CFR
93.109(m). Insignificance
determinations are based on a number
of factors, including (1) The percentage
of motor vehicle emissions in context of
the total SIP inventory; (2) the current
state of air quality as determined by
monitoring data for that NAAQS; (3) the
absence of SIP motor vehicle control
measures; and (4) historical trends and
future projections of the growth of
motor vehicle emissions. EPA’s
rationale for the providing for
insignificance determinations is
described in the July 1, 2004, revision
to the Transportation Conformity Rule
at 69 FR 40004.19 Specifically, the
rationale is explained on page 40061
under the subsection entitled ‘‘XXIII. B.
Areas With Insignificant Motor Vehicle
Emissions.’’ Any insignificance
determination under review of EPA is
subject to the adequacy and approval
process for EPA’s action on the SIP.
Through the adequacy and SIP
approval process, EPA may find that a
SIP demonstrates that regional motor
vehicle emissions are an insignificant
contributor to the air quality problem
for the pollutant or precursor at issue.
In the case of the Hickory Area, EPA
made its insignificance determination
for directly emitted PM2.5 as part of the
19 In the July 1, 2004, final rule, provisions for
insignificance determinations were outlined in 40
CFR 93.109(k). EPA revised 40 CFR 93.109 in its
March 24, 2010 final rule (75 FR 14260) and the
provisions for insignificance determinations are
now located at 40 CFR 93.109(m).
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
58223
adequacy process on May 2, 2011 (76 FR
24475). As a result of EPA’s
insignificance determination, the
Hickory Area was no longer required to
perform regional emissions analyses for
directly emitted PM2.5 as part of future
PM2.5 conformity determinations for the
1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS until such
time that EPA reviewed and took action
on Hickory redesignation request for the
1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS (the subject
of this proposed action). Upon the
effective date of EPA’s adequacy
determination, Federal regulations no
longer require a regional emissions
analysis (for the purpose of
transportation conformity
implementation) for the relevant
pollutant or precursor. Areas with
insignificant regional motor vehicle
emissions for a pollutant or precursor
are still required to make a conformity
determination that satisfies other
relevant conformity requirements.
Additionally, such areas are required to
satisfy the regional emissions analysis
requirements for pollutants or
precursors for which EPA has not made
a determination of insignificance.
The maintenance plan for the Hickory
Area, included as part of the SIP
revision, contains MVEBs for NOx and
an insignificance determination for the
direct PM2.5 contribution of motor
vehicles to the air quality problem in
the Hickory Area. As part of the
preparation for its redesignation request,
North Carolina consulted with the
interagency consultation group for the
Hickory Area regarding the direct PM2.5
insignificance determination. For the
purposes of regional emissions analysis,
the information provided by North
Carolina supports EPA’s proposal to
determine that the PM2.5 contribution
from motor vehicles to PM2.5 pollution
in the Hickory Area is insignificant. The
information provided by North Carolina
to EPA, as part of the SIP revision,
addresses each of the factors listed in 40
CFR 93.109(m) and is summarized
below. The 2009 on-road PM2.5
emissions account for less than two
percent of the total direct PM2.5 from all
sources in the Hickory Area SIP
inventory. In addition, direct PM2.5
emissions from on-road mobile sources
decreased by 25 percent from 2002–
2009 (100 tpy to 75 tpy) while vehicle
miles traveled (VMT) increased 14
percent during the same time frame. As
shown in Table 3 above, North
Carolina’s maintenance plan
demonstrates that on-road PM2.5
emissions will continue to decrease
through 2021, the end of the
maintenance plan for the Hickory Area.
In addition, since 2006, the PM2.5
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
58224
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
annual average concentration has
decreased by 32 percent such that the
Area is now attaining the Annual PM2.5
NAAQS with a 2007–2009 design value
of 12.6 μg/m3, well below the standard
of 15.0 μg/m3. According to information
provided by North Carolina, point
sources contributed nearly 97 percent of
the emissions in future years in the
Hickory Area. Support for these
percentages is found in Figure 4.5.2–3,
located in the supplemental Appendix
C.3—Mobile Source Inventory
Documentation North Carolina’s
submittal (available in the Docket for
this proposed rulemaking). In addition,
North Carolina conducted a sensitivity
analysis that doubled the PM2.5
emissions from on-road mobile sources
in 2008 which indicated a negligible
difference (0.04 μg/m3) in the PM2.5
modeling design value in Catawba
County. As a result, the information
provided by North Carolina indicates
that the direct PM2.5 contribution from
on-road mobile sources to PM2.5
pollution is insignificant for the Hickory
Area.
With regard to the factor relating to
the absence of motor vehicle control
measures in the SIP, EPA considered the
existence of a vehicle inspection and
maintenance program in the North
Carolina SIP and its implementation in
Catawba County comprising the Hickory
Area. The program, which was added to
the North Carolina SIP to control
precursors of ozone rather than as a
PM2.5 control measure, is currently
being implemented in the Hickory Area.
After evaluating the information
provided by North Carolina and
weighing the factors for the
insignificance determination outlined in
40 CFR 93.109(m), EPA is now
proposing to approve North Carolina’s
determination that the direct PM2.5
contribution from motor vehicle
emissions to the PM2.5 pollution
problem in the Hickory Area is
insignificant. EPA’s insignificance
finding should be considered and
specifically noted in the transportation
conformity documentation that is
prepared for the Area.
After interagency consultation with
the transportation partners for the
Hickory Area, North Carolina has
developed MVEBs for NOX for the entire
Area. North Carolina developed these
MVEBs, as required, for the last year of
its maintenance plan—2021.
Additionally, the State of North
Carolina has elected to develop MVEBs
for the year 2011. The MVEBs reflect the
total on-road emissions for 2011 and
2021, plus a safety margin that is based
on an allocation from the available NOX
safety margin. Under 40 CFR 93.101, the
safety margin is the difference between
the emissions level needed for
attainment (from all sources) and the
projected level of emissions (from all
sources) in the maintenance plan. The
safety margin can be allocated to the
transportation sector, however, the total
emissions must remain below the
attainment level. These MVEBs and
allocation from the safety margin were
developed in consultation with the
transportation partners and were
calculated to account for uncertainties
in population growth, changes in
modeled vehicle miles traveled and new
emission factor models. The NOX
MVEBs for the Hickory Area are defined
in Table 5 below.
TABLE 5—HICKORY AREA NOX MVEBS
[kg/year]
2011
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
On-Road Mobile Emissions .....................................................................................................................................
Safety Margin Allocated to MVEB ...........................................................................................................................
NOX Conformity MVEB ............................................................................................................................................
As mentioned above, the Hickory
Area has chosen to allocate a portion of
the available safety margin to the NOX
MVEBs for the years 2011 and 2021. A
total of 363,327 kg/year (400 tpy) and
372,671 kg/year (411 tpy) of the
available NOX safety margins are
allocated to the 2011 and 2021 MVEB,
respectively. Thus, the remaining safety
margins in 2011 and 2021 are 4,524 tpy
and 7,093 tpy, respectively.
Through this rulemaking, EPA is
proposing to approve the MVEBs for
NOX for 2011 and 2021, including the
allocation from the NOX safety margins,
for the Hickory Area because EPA has
made the preliminary determination
that the Area maintains the 1997
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS with the
emissions at the levels of the budgets.
Once the MVEBs for the Hickory Area
are approved or found adequate
(whichever is completed first), they
must be used for future conformity
determinations and the MPOs must use
the MOVES model in future PM2.5
conformity determinations for their
long-range transportation plans and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 Sep 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
transportation improvement programs.
After thorough review, EPA has
determined that the budgets meet the
adequacy criteria, as outlined in 40 CFR
93.118(e)(4), and is proposing to
approve the budgets because they are
consistent with maintenance of the
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS through 2021.
VIII. What is the status of EPA’s
adequacy determination for the
proposed NOX MVEBs for 2011 and
2021 and for the direct PM2.5
insignificance determination for the
Hickory Area?
When reviewing a submitted ‘‘control
strategy’’ SIP or maintenance plan
containing an MVEB, EPA may
affirmatively find the MVEB contained
therein adequate for use in determining
transportation conformity. Once EPA
affirmatively finds the submitted MVEB
is adequate for transportation
conformity purposes, that MVEB must
be used by state and Federal agencies in
determining whether proposed
transportation projects conform to the
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2021
3,633,274
363,327
3,996,601
1,863,357
372,671
2,236,028
SIP as required by section 176(c) of the
CAA.
EPA’s substantive criteria for
determining adequacy of an MVEB are
set out in 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4). The
process for determining adequacy
consists of three basic steps: public
notification of a SIP submission, a
public comment period, and EPA’s
adequacy determination. This process
for determining the adequacy of
submitted MVEBs for transportation
conformity purposes was initially
outlined in EPA’s May 14, 1999,
guidance, ‘‘Conformity Guidance on
Implementation of March 2, 1999,
Conformity Court Decision.’’ EPA
adopted regulations to codify the
adequacy process in the Transportation
Conformity Rule Amendments for the
‘‘New 8-Hour Ozone and PM2.5 National
Ambient Air Quality Standards and
Miscellaneous Revisions for Existing
Areas; Transportation Conformity Rule
Amendments—Response to Court
Decision and Additional Rule Change,’’
on July 1, 2004 (69 FR 40004).
Additional information on the adequacy
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
process for transportation conformity
purposes is available in the proposed
rule entitled, ‘‘Transportation
Conformity Rule Amendments:
Response to Court Decision and
Additional Rule Changes,’’ 68 FR 38974,
38984 (June 30, 2003).
As discussed earlier, North Carolina’s
maintenance plan submission includes
NOX MVEBs for the Hickory Area for
the years 2011 and 2021. EPA reviewed
the NOX MVEBs through the adequacy
process. The North Carolina SIP
submission, including the Hickory Area
NOX MVEBs, was open for public
comment on EPA’s adequacy Web site
on November 23, 2010, found at:
https://www.epa.gov/otaq/
stateresources/transconf/currsips.htm.
The EPA public comment period on
adequacy NOX MVEBs for 2011 and
2021 for Hickory Area closed on
December 23, 2010. EPA did not receive
any comments on the adequacy of the
MVEBs, nor did EPA receive any
requests for the SIP submittal.
In a letter sent on February 3, 2011,
EPA notified North Carolina DAQ that
the MOVES based 2011 and 2021
MVEBs for the Hickory Area were
determined to be adequate for
transportation conformity purposes. On
May 2, 2011, EPA published its
adequacy notice in the Federal Register
(76 FR 24475). When EPA finds the
2011 and 2021 MVEBs adequate or
approves them, the new MVEBs for NOX
must be used for future transportation
conformity determinations. For required
regional emissions analysis years prior
to 2011, the applicable budgets are the
2009 MVEBs and direct PM2.5
insignificance determination from the
attainment demonstration, which have
already been found adequate through
another action. (75 FR 9204 and 75 FR
26751). For required regional emissions
analysis years that involve 2011–2020,
the applicable budgets will be the new
2011 MVEBs. For required regional
emissions analysis years that involve
2021 or beyond, the applicable budgets
will be the new 2021 MVEBs. The 2011
and 2021 MVEBs are defined in section
VII of this proposed rulemaking.
IX. What is EPA’s analysis of the
proposed 2008 base year emissions
inventory for the Hickory Area?
As discussed in section VI above,
section 172(c)(3) of the CAA requires
areas to submit a comprehensive,
58225
accurate and current emissions
inventory. As part of North Carolina’s
request to redesignate the Hickory Area,
the State submitted a 2008 base year
emissions inventory to meet this
requirement. Emissions contained in the
submittal cover the general source
categories of point sources, area sources,
on-road mobile sources, and non-road
mobile sources. All emission summaries
were accompanied by source-specific
descriptions of emission calculation
procedures and sources of input data.
On December 22, 2010, DAQ provided
EPA with a supplemental SIP revision
to update the on-road mobile emissions
by replacing the on-road mobile
emissions that were prepared with
MOBILE6.2 with on-road emissions that
were prepared using the new MOVES
emissions model. North Carolina’s
submittal documents 2008 emissions in
the Hickory Area in units of tpy. Table
6 below provides a summary of the 2008
emissions of direct PM2.5, NOX, and SO2
for the Hickory Area. For emissions in
other years, refer to Tables 3 and 4.
TABLE 6—HICKORY AREA 2008 EMISSIONS FOR PM2.5, NOX, AND SO2
[tpy (percent total)]
Source
NOX
PM2.5
SO2
Point Source Total ...............................................................................................
Area Source Total ................................................................................................
On-Road Mobile Source Total .............................................................................
Non-Road Mobile Source Total ...........................................................................
6,976 [88.4]
682 [8.6]
166 [2.1]
70 [0.9]
13,310 [66.1]
662 [3.3]
4,982 [24.8]
1,173 [5.8]
6,189 [72.8]
2,263 [26.6]
35 [0.4]
18 [0.2]
Total for all Sources .....................................................................................
7,894
20,127
8,505
In today’s notice, EPA is proposing to
approve this 2008 base year inventory as
meeting the section 172(c)(3) emissions
inventory requirement.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
X. Proposed Actions on the
Redesignation Request and
Maintenance Plan SIP Revision
Including Approval of the NOX MVEBs
for 2011 and 2021 and the Direct PM2.5
Insignificance Determination for the
Hickory Area
EPA previously determined that the
Hickory Area was attaining the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS on January 5, 2010, at 75
FR 230. EPA is now taking four separate
but related actions regarding the Area’s
redesignation and maintenance of the
1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS. Three of
the actions are discussed in this section
and the fourth is discussed in the next
section.
First, EPA is proposing to determine,
based on complete, quality-assured and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 Sep 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
certified monitoring data for the 2007–
2009 monitoring period, and after
review of preliminary data in AQS for
2008–2010, that the Hickory Area
continues to attain the 1997 Annual
PM2.5 NAAQS. Provided that EPA takes
final action to approve the NCSSA and,
under section 172(c)(3), the 2008 base
emissions inventory, EPA is proposing
to determine that the Hickory Area has
met the criteria under CAA section
107(d)(3)(E) for redesignation from
nonattainment to attainment for the
1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS. On this
basis, EPA is proposing to approve
North Carolina’s redesignation request
for the Hickory Area.
Second, EPA is proposing to approve
North Carolina’s 2008 emissions
inventory for the Hickory Area (under
section CAA 172(c)(3)). North Carolina
selected 2008 as the attainment
emissions inventory year for the
Hickory Area. This attainment inventory
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
identifies a level of emissions in the
Area that is sufficient to attain the 1997
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS and also is a
current, comprehensive inventory that
meets the requirements of section
172(c)(3).
Third, subject to final approval of the
NCCSA rules, EPA is proposing to
approve North Carolina’s submitted
maintenance plan for the Hickory Area,
including the NOX MVEBs for 2011 and
2021 and the insignificance
determination for the direct PM2.5
contribution of motor vehicles to PM2.5
pollution, as meeting the requirements
of section 175A of the CAA. The
maintenance plan demonstrates that the
Area will continue to maintain the 1997
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS, and the budgets
meet all of the adequacy criteria
contained in 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4) and
(5). Further, as part of today’s action,
EPA is describing the status of its
adequacy determination for the NOX
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
58226
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
MVEBs for 2011 and 2021 and the
mobile source direct PM2.5
insignificance determination for the
PM2.5 NAAQS in accordance with 40
CFR 93.118(f)(1). On May 2, 2011, EPA
published its adequacy notice in the
Federal Register (76 FR 24472). Within
24 months from the effective date of
EPA’s adequacy determination, the
transportation partners will need to
demonstrate conformity to the new NOX
MVEBs pursuant to 40 CFR 93.104(e)
and will need to document the mobile
source direct PM2.5 insignificance
determination for the PM2.5 NAAQS in
future conformity determinations (76 FR
24475).
If finalized, approval of the
redesignation request would change the
official designation of Catawba County
in the Hickory Area for the 1997 Annual
PM2.5 NAAQS, found at 40 CFR part 81,
from nonattainment to attainment. EPA
is also proposing to approve into the
North Carolina SIP the maintenance
plan for the Hickory Area, the emissions
inventory submitted with the
maintenance plan, and the 2011 and
2021 MVEBs. EPA is proposing to take
these actions if and when EPA finalizes,
after notice and comment rulemaking,
its approval of the NCSSA rules as a
revision to the North Carolina SIP.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
XI. Proposed Action on the
Determination That the Hickory Area
Has Attained the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS by
Its Applicable Attainment Date
The fourth action EPA is proposing
today is to determine, based on qualityassured and certified monitoring data
for the 2007–2009 monitoring period,
that the Hickory Area attained the 1997
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS by its applicable
attainment date of April 5, 2010. This
determination is being proposed in
accordance with section 179(c)(1) of the
CAA and EPA regulations.
XII. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, redesignation of an
area to attainment and the
accompanying approval of a
maintenance plan under section
107(d)(3)(E) are actions that affect the
status of a geographical area and do not
impose any additional regulatory
requirements on sources beyond those
imposed by state law. A redesignation to
attainment does not in and of itself
create any new requirements, but rather
results in the applicability of
requirements contained in the CAA for
areas that have been redesignated to
attainment. Moreover, the Administrator
is required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 Sep 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, these proposed
actions merely approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and do
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
this reason, these proposed actions:
• Are not ‘‘significant regulatory
action[s]’’ subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Do not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Are certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Do not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Do not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Are not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Are not a significant regulatory
action subject to Executive Order 13211
(66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
• Are not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Do not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule does
not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: September 9, 2011.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2011–24103 Filed 9–19–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
46 CFR Part 28
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0887]
RIN 1625–AB61
Waiver of Citizenship Requirements for
Crewmembers on Commercial Fishing
Vessels; Correction
AGENCY:
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking;
correction.
ACTION:
This document corrects the
Regulatory Identification Number (RIN)
to a proposed rule published in the
Federal Register on August 18, 2011,
entitled ‘‘Waiver of Citizenship
Requirements for Crewmembers on
Commercial Fishing Vessels.’’ This
correction provides correct information
with regard to the RIN.
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail Mr. David Belliveau,
Office of Vessel Activities (CG–5433),
Coast Guard; telephone 202–372–1247,
e-mail David.J.Belliveau@uscg.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Correction
In the Federal Register of August 18,
2011, in FR Vol. 76, No. 160, on page
51317, in the first column, correct the
RIN to read: RIN 1625–AB61.
Dated: September 14, 2011.
Kathryn G. Sinniger,
Chief, Office of Regulations and
Administrative Law.
List of Subjects
[FR Doc. 2011–24055 Filed 9–19–11; 8:45 am]
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, and Particulate matter.
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 20, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 58210-58226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24103]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA-R04-OAR-2009-1010-201063; FRL-9467-7]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Designation
of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; North Carolina:
Redesignation of the Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir 1997 Annual Fine
Particulate Matter Nonattainment Area to Attainment
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve SIP revisions submitted on
December 18, 2009, and December 22, 2010 (supplemental submission) by
the State of North Carolina, through the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (NC DENR), Division of Air Quality
(DAQ), to support North Carolina's request to redesignate the Hickory-
Morganton-Lenoir fine particulate matter (PM2.5)
nonattainment area (hereafter the ``Hickory Area'' or ``Area'') to
attainment for the 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS). The Hickory Area is comprised of Catawba
County in its entirety. EPA is now proposing four separate but related
actions. First, EPA is proposing to approve the December 18, 2009,
PM2.5 redesignation request, including the December 22,
2010, Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES) mobile model supplement
for the Hickory Area, provided that EPA takes final action to approve
specific provisions of the North Carolina Clean Smokestacks Act
(NCCSA). Second, EPA is proposing to approve North Carolina's 2008
emissions inventory for the Hickory Area under section 172(c)(3) of the
Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). Third, subject to the same proviso
regarding the NCCSA and final approval of the 2008 emissions inventory,
EPA is proposing to approve the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS
maintenance plan for the Hickory Area, including the 2008 baseline
emissions inventory, and the motor vehicle emission budgets (MVEBs) for
nitrogen oxides (NOX) for the years 2011 and 2021, and the
mobile insignificance determination for direct PM2.5 for the
Hickory Area. EPA is also describing the status of its transportation
conformity adequacy determination for the new 2011 and 2021 MVEBs for
NOX that are contained in the 1997 Annual PM2.5
NAAQS maintenance plan for the Hickory Area. Fourth and separate from
the action to redesignate the Hickory Area, EPA is proposing to
determine that the Area has attained the 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS by its applicable attainment date of April 5, 2010. These
proposed actions are being taken pursuant to the CAA and its
implementing regulations.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 20, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2009-1010, by one of the following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-mail: benjamin.lynorae@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (404) 562-9019.
4. Mail: EPA-R04-OAR-2009-1010, Regulatory Development Section, Air
Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
[[Page 58211]]
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Ms. Lynorae Benjamin, Chief,
Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides
and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours
of operation. The Regional Office's official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R04-OAR-
2009-1010. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail, information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site is an
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's
official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joel Huey, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Joel Huey may be reached by
phone at (404) 562-9104 or via electronic mail at huey.joel@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. What are the actions EPA is proposing to take?
II. What is the background for EPA's proposed actions?
III. What are the criteria for redesignation?
IV. Why is EPA proposing these actions?
V. What is the effect of EPA's proposed actions?
VI. What is EPA's analysis of the request?
VII. What is EPA's analysis of North Carolina's proposed direct
PM2.5 insignificance determination and the proposed
NOX MVEBs for the Hickory area?
VIII. What is the status of EPA's adequacy determination for the
proposed NOX MVEBs for 2011 and 2021 and for the Direct
PM2.5 insignificance determination for the Hickory area?
IX. What is EPA's analysis of the proposed 2008 base year emissions
inventory for the Hickory area?
X. Proposed Actions on the Redesignation Request and Maintenance
Plan SIP Revision Including Proposed Approval of the 2011 and 2021
NOX MVEBs and for the Insignificance Determination for
the Hickory Area
XI. Proposed Action on the Determination that the Hickory Area Has
Attained the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS by Its Applicable
Attainment Date
XII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What are the actions EPA is proposing to take?
EPA is proposing to take the following four separate but related
actions, some of which involve multiple elements: (1) To redesignate
the Hickory Area to attainment for the 1997 Annual PM2.5
NAAQS, provided EPA approves the emissions inventory submitted with the
maintenance plan as well as the NCCSA, which is the subject of separate
Federal rulemaking action; (2) to approve, under section 172(c)(3) of
the CAA, the emissions inventory submitted with the maintenance plan;
(3) to approve into the North Carolina SIP, under section 175A of the
CAA, Hickory's 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS maintenance plan,
including the associated MVEBs (EPA is also notifying the public of the
status of EPA's adequacy determination for the Hickory Area MVEBs); and
(4) to determine, pursuant to section 179(c) of the CAA, that the
Hickory Area attained the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS by its attainment
date of April 5, 2010.
On January 5, 2010, at 75 FR 230, EPA determined that the Hickory
Area was attaining the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA is now
proposing to determine that the Area is continuing to attain the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS and to take several additional related actions
regarding the Area, which are summarized below and described in greater
detail throughout this notice of proposed rulemaking.
First, EPA proposes to determine that, if EPA's proposed approvals
of the 2008 baseline emissions inventory for the Hickory Area and the
NCCSA Federal rulemaking action are finalized, the Area has met the
requirements for redesignation under section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA.
In this action, EPA is proposing to approve a request to change the
legal designation of Catawba County in the Hickory Area from
nonattainment to attainment for the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
The emissions inventory is being proposed for approval today, and the
NCCSA rules were proposed for approval in a separate action on June 22,
2011 (76 FR 36468).
Second, EPA is proposing to approve North Carolina's 2008 emissions
inventory for the Hickory Area (under CAA section 172(c)(3)). North
Carolina selected 2008 as the attainment emissions inventory year for
the Hickory Area. This attainment inventory identifies a level of
emissions in the Area that is sufficient to attain the 1997 Annual
PM2.5 NAAQS and is a current, comprehensive inventory that
meets the requirements of section 172(c)(3).
Third, subject to EPA's final approval of the NCCSA into the SIP,
EPA is proposing to approve North Carolina's 1997 Annual
PM2.5 NAAQS maintenance plan for the Hickory Area as meeting
the requirements of CAA section 175A (such approval being one of the
CAA criteria for redesignation to attainment status). The maintenance
plan is designed to help keep the
[[Page 58212]]
Hickory Area in attainment of the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS
through 2021. Consistent with the CAA, the maintenance plan that EPA is
proposing to approve today also includes NOx MVEBs for the years 2011
and 2021 and an insignificance determination for the mobile source
contribution of direct PM2.5 to the air quality problem in
the Hickory Area. EPA is proposing to approve into the North Carolina
SIP the 2011 and 2021 MVEBs that are included as part of North
Carolina's maintenance plan for the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS
and the insignificance determination for the mobile source contribution
of direct PM2.5 emissions in the Area.
On a related matter to this third action, EPA is also notifying the
public of the status of EPA's adequacy process (Adequacy) for the
newly-established NOx MVEBs for 2011 and 2021 for the Hickory Area and
the mobile source insignificance determination for direct
PM2.5 emissions. The Adequacy comment period for the Hickory
Area 2011 and 2021 MVEBs began on November 23, 2010, with EPA's posting
of the availability of this submittal on EPA's Adequacy Web site
(https://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/currsips.htm). The
Adequacy comment period for these MVEBs and the insignificance
determination for direct PM2.5 emission contribution from
motor vehicles closed on December 23, 2010, and EPA received no adverse
comments. Please see section VIII of this proposed rulemaking for
further explanation of this process and for more details on the MVEBs
determination and the insignificance determination.
Fourth and separate from the action to redesignate the Area, EPA is
proposing to determine, based on quality-assured and certified
monitoring data for the 2007-2009 monitoring period, that the Hickory
Area has attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS by its
applicable attainment date of April 5, 2010.
Today's notice of proposed rulemaking is in response to North
Carolina's December 18, 2009, SIP submittal and subsequent supplement
of December 22, 2010. Those documents address the specific issues
summarized above and the necessary elements described in section
107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA for redesignation of the Hickory Area to
attainment for the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
II. What is the background for EPA's proposed actions?
Fine particle pollution can be emitted directly or formed
secondarily in the atmosphere. The main precursors of PM2.5
are sulfur dioxide (SO2), NOx, ammonia and volatile organic
compounds (VOCs). Unless otherwise noted by the State or EPA, ammonia
and VOCs are presumed to be insignificant contributors to
PM2.5 formation, whereas SO2 and NOX
are presumed to be significant contributors to PM2.5
formation. Sulfates are a type of secondary particle formed from
SO2 emissions of power plants and industrial facilities.
Nitrates, another common type of secondary particle, are formed from
NOx emissions of power plants, automobiles, and other combustion
sources.
On July 18, 1997, EPA promulgated the first air quality standards
for PM2.5. EPA promulgated an annual standard at a level of
15 micrograms per cubic meter ([mu]g/m\3\), based on a three-year
average of annual mean PM2.5 concentrations. In the same
rulemaking, EPA promulgated a 24-hour standard of 65 [mu]g/m\3\, based
on a three-year average of the 98th percentile of 24-hour
concentrations. On October 17, 2006, at 71 FR 61144, EPA retained the
annual average NAAQS at 15 [mu]g/m\3\ but revised the 24-hour NAAQS to
35 [mu]g/m\3\, based again on the three-year average of the 98th
percentile of 24-hour concentrations.\1\ Under EPA regulations at 40
CFR part 50, the primary and secondary 1997 Annual PM2.5
NAAQS are attained when the annual arithmetic mean concentration, as
determined in accordance with 40 CFR part 50, Appendix N, is less than
or equal to 15.0 [mu]g/m\3\ at all relevant monitoring sites in the
subject area over a 3-year period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In response to legal challenges of the annual standard
promulgated in 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) remanded this NAAQS to
EPA for further consideration. See American Farm Bureau Federation
and National Pork Producers Council, et al. v. EPA, 559 F.3d 512
(D.C. Cir. 2009). However, given that the 1997 and 2006 annual NAAQS
are essentially identical, attainment of the 1997 Annual NAAQS would
also indicate attainment of the remanded 2006 Annual NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On January 5, 2005, at 70 FR 944, and as supplemented on April 14,
2005, at 70 FR 19844, EPA designated the Hickory Area as nonattainment
for the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS. In that action, EPA defined
the 1997 PM2.5 Hickory Area to include Catawba County in its
entirety. On November 13, 2009, at 74 FR 58688, EPA promulgated
designations for the 24-hour standard established in 2006, designating
the Hickory Area as attaining this NAAQS. That action clarified that
the Hickory Area was also attaining the 24-hour NAAQS promulgated in
1997. EPA did not promulgate designations for the annual average NAAQS
promulgated in 2006 since the NAAQS was essentially identical to the
annual PM2.5 NAAQS promulgated in 1997. Therefore, the
Hickory Area is designated nonattainment only for the annual NAAQS
promulgated in 1997, and today's action only addresses this
designation.
All 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS areas were designated under subpart
1 of title I, part D, of the CAA. Subpart 1 contains the general
requirements for nonattainment areas for any pollutant governed by a
NAAQS and is less prescriptive than the other subparts of title I, part
D. On April 25, 2007, at 72 FR 20664, EPA promulgated its
PM2.5 Implementation Rule, codified at 40 CFR part 51,
subpart Z, in which the Agency provided guidance for state and tribal
plans to implement the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. This rule, at 40
CFR 51.1004(c), specifies some of the regulatory consequences of
attaining the NAAQS, as discussed below.
On May 12, 2005, EPA published the Clean Air Interstate Rule
(CAIR), which addressed the interstate transport requirements of the
CAA and required states to significantly reduce SO2 and NOx
emissions from power plants (70 FR 25162). The associated Federal
Implementation Plans (FIPs) were published on April 28, 2006 (71 FR
25328). However, on July 11, 2008, the D.C. Circuit Court issued its
decision to vacate and remand both CAIR and the associated CAIR FIPs in
their entirety (North Carolina v. EPA, 531 F.3d 836 (D.C. Cir., 2008)).
EPA petitioned for rehearing, and the Court issued an order remanding
CAIR to EPA without vacating either CAIR or the CAIR FIPs (North
Carolina v. EPA, 550 F.3d 1176 (D.C. Cir., 2008)). The Court left CAIR
in place to ``temporarily preserve the environmental values covered by
CAIR'' until EPA replaces it with a rule consistent with the Court's
opinion (id. at 1178). The Court directed EPA to ``remedy CAIR's
flaws'' consistent with its July 11, 2008, opinion but declined to
impose a schedule on EPA for completing that action (id). As a result
of these court rulings, the power plant emission reductions that
resulted solely from the development, promulgation, and implementation
of CAIR, and the associated contribution to air quality improvement
that occurred solely as a result of CAIR in the Hickory Area could not
be considered to be permanent.
On August 8, 2011, EPA published the Cross State Air Pollution Rule
(CSAPR) in the Federal Register under the title, ``Federal
Implementation Plans to Reduce Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate
Matter and Ozone in 27 States; Correction of SIP Approvals for 22
States'' (hereafter the ``Cross-State Air Pollution Rule'' (CSAPR)) (76
FR
[[Page 58213]]
48208, August 8, 2011) to address interstate transport of emissions and
resulting secondary air pollutants and to replace CAIR. The CAIR
emission reduction requirements limit emissions in North Carolina and
states upwind of North Carolina through 2011 and the CSAPR requires
similar or greater reductions in the relevant areas in 2012 and beyond.
The emission reductions that the CSAPR mandates may be considered to be
permanent and enforceable. In turn, the air quality improvement in the
Hickory Area that has resulted from EGU emission reductions associated
with CAIR (as well as the substantial further air quality improvement
that would be expected to result from full implementation of the CSAPR)
may also be considered to be permanent and enforceable. EPA proposes
that the requirement in section 107(d)(3)(E)(iii) has now been met
because the emission reduction requirements of CAIR address emissions
through 2011 and EPA has now promulgated CSAPR which requires similar
or greater reductions in the relevant areas in 2012 and beyond. Because
the emission reduction requirements of CAIR are enforceable through the
2011 control period, and because CSAPR has now been promulgated to
address the requirements previously addressed by CAIR and gets similar
or greater reductions in the relevant areas in 2012 and beyond, EPA is
proposing to determine that the emission reductions that led to
attainment in the Hickory nonattainment area can now be considered
permanent and enforceable. Therefore, EPA propose to find that the
transport requirement of CAA section 107(d)(3)(E)(iii) has been met for
the Hickory Area.
The 3-year ambient air quality data for 2006-2008 indicated no
violations of the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS for the Hickory Area. As
a result, on December 18, 2009, and as supplemented on December, 22,
2010, North Carolina requested redesignation of the Hickory Area to
attainment for the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS. The
redesignation request included three years of complete, quality-assured
ambient air quality data for the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS for
2006-2008, indicating that the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS had
been achieved for the Hickory Area. Under the CAA, nonattainment areas
may be redesignated to attainment if sufficient, complete, quality-
assured data is available for the Administrator to determine that the
area has attained the standard and the area meets the other CAA
redesignation requirements in section 107(d)(3)(E). From 2005 through
the present, the monitored annual average PM2.5 values for
the Hickory Area have declined such that the Area is attaining the 1997
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS. On January 5, 2010, EPA determined that
the Hickory Area had attained the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS
(75 FR 230). While annual PM2.5 concentrations are dependent
on a variety of conditions, the overall downtrend in annual
PM2.5 concentrations in the Hickory Area can be attributed
to the reduction of SO2 emissions, as will be discussed in
more detail in section VI of this proposed rulemaking. EPA is now
proposing to find that the Hickory Area continues to attain the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS.
III. What are the criteria for redesignation?
The CAA provides the requirements for redesignating a nonattainment
area to attainment. Specifically, section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA
allows for redesignation provided the following criteria are met: (1)
The Administrator determines that the area has attained the applicable
NAAQS; (2) the Administrator has fully approved the applicable
implementation plan for the area under section 110(k); (3) the
Administrator determines that the improvement in air quality is due to
permanent and enforceable reductions in emissions resulting from
implementation of the applicable SIP and applicable Federal air
pollutant control regulations and other permanent and enforceable
reductions; (4) the Administrator has fully approved a maintenance plan
for the area as meeting the requirements of section 175A; and (5) the
state containing such area has met all requirements applicable to the
area under section 110 and part D of title I of the CAA.
EPA has provided guidance on redesignation in the General Preamble
for the Implementation of title I of the CAA Amendments of 1990 (April
16, 1992, 57 FR 13498, and supplemented on April 28, 1992, 57 FR 18070)
and has provided further guidance on processing redesignation requests
in the following documents:
1. ``Procedures for Processing Requests to Redesignate Areas to
Attainment,'' Memorandum from John Calcagni, Director, Air Quality
Management Division, September 4, 1992 (hereafter referred to as the
``Calcagni Memorandum'');
2. ``State Implementation Plan (SIP) Actions Submitted in Response
to Clean Air Act (CAA) Deadlines,'' Memorandum from John Calcagni,
Director, Air Quality Management Division, October 28, 1992; and
3. ``Part D New Source Review (Part D NSR) Requirements for Areas
Requesting Redesignation to Attainment,'' Memorandum from Mary D.
Nichols, Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation, October 14,
1994.
IV. Why is EPA proposing these actions?
On December 18, 2009, and as supplemented on December 22, 2010, the
State of North Carolina, through DAQ, requested redesignation of the
Hickory Area to attainment for the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
EPA's evaluation indicates that the Hickory Area has attained the 1997
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS. If EPA finalizes approval of the
emissions inventory and the NCCSA rulemaking, the Area will meet the
requirements for redesignation set forth in section 107(d)(3)(E),
including the maintenance plan requirements under section 175A of the
CAA. As a result, EPA is proposing to take the first three related
actions previously summarized.
The fourth action, to determine that the Area has attained the 1997
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS by its attainment date, is being proposed
in accordance with section 179(c)(1) of the CAA based upon EPA's review
of the data for 2007-2009. Section 179(c)(1) reads as follows: ``As
expeditiously as practicable after the applicable attainment date for
any nonattainment area, but not later than 6 months after such date,
the Administrator shall determine, based on the area's air quality as
of the attainment date, whether the area attained the standard by that
date.'' EPA proposes to determine that the Area attained the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS by its applicable attainment date of
April 5, 2010.
V. What is the effect of EPA's proposed actions?
EPA's proposed actions establish the basis upon which EPA may take
final action on the North Carolina submittal being proposed for
approval today. Approval of North Carolina's redesignation request
would change the legal designation of Catawba County in North Carolina
for the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS, found at 40 CFR part 81,
from nonattainment to attainment. Approval of North Carolina's request
would also incorporate into the North Carolina SIP a plan for
maintaining the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS in the Hickory Area
through 2021. The maintenance plan includes, among other components,
contingency measures to remedy potential future violations of the 1997
Annual PM2.5
[[Page 58214]]
NAAQS. Approval of North Carolina's maintenance plan would also result
in approval of the NOX MVEBs and the direct PM2.5
mobile source insignificance determination. The maintenance plan also
establishes NOx MVEBs for 2011 and 2021 for the Hickory Area of
3,996,601 kilograms per year (kg/yr) and 2,236,028 kg/yr, respectively.
Final action would also approve the Area's emissions inventory under
section 172(c)(3). Additionally, EPA is notifying the public of the
status of its adequacy determination for the NOX MVEBs for
2011 and 2021 and the direct PM2.5 mobile source
insignificance determination pursuant to 40 CFR 93.118(f)(1).
VI. What is EPA's analysis of the request?
As stated above, in accordance with the CAA, EPA proposes in
today's action to: (1) Redesignate the Hickory Area to attainment for
the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS; (2) approve the Hickory Area
emissions inventory submitted with the maintenance plan; (3) approve
into the North Carolina SIP Hickory's 1997 Annual PM2.5
NAAQS maintenance plan, including the associated MVEBs; and (4)
determine that the Hickory Area attained the 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS by its attainment date of April 5, 2010. The first three of these
actions are based upon EPA's determination that the Hickory Area
continues to attain the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS and that all
other redesignation criteria have been met for the Hickory Area,
provided EPA approves the emissions inventory submitted with the
maintenance plan and the NCCSA rulemaking. The five redesignation
criteria provided under CAA section 107(d)(3)(E) are discussed in
greater detail for the Area in the following paragraphs of this
section. The fourth action, EPA's determination that the Hickory Area
attained the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS by its attainment date of
April 5, 2010, is discussed in section XI.
Criteria (1)--The Hickory Area Has Attained the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS
For redesignating a nonattainment area to attainment, the CAA
requires EPA to determine that the area has attained the applicable
NAAQS (CAA section 107(d)(3)(E)(i)). EPA is proposing to determine that
the Hickory Area continues to attain the 1997 Annual PM2.5
NAAQS. For PM2.5, an area may be considered to be attaining
the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS if it meets the 1997 Annual
PM2.5 NAAQS, as determined in accordance with 40 CFR 50.7
and Appendix N of part 50, based on three complete, consecutive
calendar years of quality-assured air quality monitoring data. To
attain these NAAQS, the 3-year average of the annual arithmetic mean
concentration, as determined in accordance with 40 CFR part 50,
Appendix N, is less than or equal to 15.0 [micro]g/m\3\ at all relevant
monitoring sites in the subject area over a 3-year period. The relevant
data must be collected and quality-assured in accordance with 40 CFR
part 58 and recorded in the EPA Air Quality System (AQS). The monitors
generally should have remained at the same location for the duration of
the monitoring period required for demonstrating attainment.
On January 5, 2010, at 75 FR 230, EPA determined that the Hickory
Area was attaining the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA reviewed
PM2.5 monitoring data from monitoring sites in the Hickory
Area for the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS for the 2006-2008 and
the 2007-2009 periods. These data have been quality-assured and are
recorded in AQS. The annual arithmetic mean PM2.5
concentrations for the 2006-2008, and the 2007-2009 periods, and the 3-
year averages of these values (i.e., design values) are summarized in
Table 1.\2\ EPA has reviewed more recent data which indicate that the
Hickory Area continues to attain the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. The
design values for 2007-2009 and 2008-2010 are also included in Table 1
and demonstrate that the Hickory Area continues to meet the
PM2.5 NAAQS and that the ambient concentrations of
PM2.5 are continuing to decrease in the Area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The values in Table 1 represent the most current quality
assured, quality controlled and certified ambient air monitoring
data available in the EPA AQS database and therefore differ slightly
from the values submitted in the North Carolina redesignation
request.
Table 1--Design Value Concentrations for the Hickory 1997 Annual PM2.5 Nonattainment Area
[[mu]g/m\3\]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual average PM2.5 concentrations ([mu]g/m \3\)
County Site name Monitor ID --------------------------------------------------------------
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 \3\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Catawba Hickory 37-035-0004 15.18 14.62 12.75 10.32 11.23
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Three-year PM2.5 design values ([mu]g/m\3\)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006-2008 2007-2009 2008-2010
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Catawba Hickory 37-035-0004 14.2 12.6 11.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 3-year design value (2006-2008) submitted by North Carolina for
redesignation of the Hickory Area is 14.2 [mu]g/m\3\, which meets the
NAAQS as described above. Preliminary 2010 air quality data that are
available in AQS, but not yet certified, indicate that the Area
continues to attain the PM2.5 NAAQS. As mentioned above, on
January 5, 2010 (75 FR 230) EPA published a clean data determination
for the Hickory Area for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. In today's
action, EPA is proposing to determine that the Area is continuing to
attain the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA will not go forward with
the redesignation if the Area does not continue to attain until the
time that EPA finalizes the redesignation. As discussed in more detail
below, the State of North Carolina has committed to continue monitoring
in the Area in accordance with 40 CFR part 58.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The preliminary PM2.5 ambient air quality data
for 2010 for the Hickory Area indicates that the Area is attaining
the NAAQS with 2008-2010 design values. This preliminary data
includes complete data from all quarters of 2010 but has not yet
been certified and is thus subject to change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 58215]]
Criteria (5)--North Carolina Has met all Applicable Requirements Under
Section 110 and Part D of Title I of the CAA; and Criteria (2)--North
Carolina Has a Fully Approved SIP Under Section 110(k) for the Hickory
Area
For redesignating a nonattainment area to attainment, the CAA
requires EPA to determine that the state has met all applicable
requirements under section 110 and part D of title I of the CAA (CAA
section 107(d)(3)(E)(v)) and that the state has a fully approved SIP
under section 110(k) for the area (CAA section 107(d)(3)(E)(ii)). EPA
proposes to find that North Carolina has met all applicable SIP
requirements for the Hickory Area under section 110 of the CAA (general
SIP requirements) for purposes of redesignation. EPA also proposes to
find that the North Carolina SIP satisfies the criterion that it meet
applicable SIP requirements for purposes of redesignation under part D
of title I of the CAA (requirements specific to 1997 Annual
PM2.5 nonattainment areas). Further, EPA proposes to
determine that the SIP is fully approved with respect to all
requirements applicable under section 110(k). In making these
determinations, EPA ascertained which requirements are applicable to
the Area and, if applicable, that they are fully approved under the
CAA. For the purposes of review of the State's redesignation request,
the SIP needs only to be fully approved with respect to requirements
that were applicable prior to submittal of the complete redesignation
request.
a. Hickory Area Has Met All Applicable Requirements Under Section 110
and Part D of Title I of the CAA
General SIP requirements. Section 110(a)(2) of title I of the CAA
delineates the general requirements for a SIP, which include
enforceable emissions limitations and other control measures, means, or
techniques; provisions for the establishment and operation of
appropriate devices necessary to collect data on ambient air quality;
and programs to enforce the limitations. General SIP elements and
requirements are delineated in section 110(a)(2) of title I, part A of
the CAA. These requirements include, but are not limited to, the
following: submittal of a SIP that has been adopted by the state after
reasonable public notice and hearing; provisions for establishment and
operation of appropriate procedures needed to monitor ambient air
quality; implementation of a source permit program; provisions for the
implementation of part C requirements (Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD)) and provisions for the implementation of part D
requirements (New Source Review (NSR) permit programs); provisions for
air pollution modeling; and provisions for public and local agency
participation in planning and emission control rule development.
Section 110(a)(2)(D) requires that SIPs contain certain measures to
prevent sources in a state from significantly contributing to air
quality problems in another state. To implement this provision, EPA has
required certain states to establish programs to address the interstate
transport of air pollutants (e.g., NOX SIP Call,\4\ CAIR,\5\
and the CSAPR). The section 110(a)(2)(D) requirements for a state are
not linked with a particular nonattainment area's designation and
classification in that state. EPA believes that the requirements linked
with a particular nonattainment area's designation and classifications
are the relevant measures to evaluate in reviewing a redesignation
request. The transport SIP submittal requirements, where applicable,
continue to apply to a state regardless of the designation of any one
particular area in the state. Thus, EPA does not believe that the CAA's
interstate transport requirements should be construed to be applicable
requirements for purposes of redesignation. However, as discussed later
in this notice, addressing pollutant transport from other states is an
important part of an area's maintenance demonstration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ On October 27, 1998 (63 FR 57356), EPA issued a
NOX SIP Call requiring the District of Columbia and 22
states to reduce emissions of NOX in order to reduce the
transport of ozone and ozone precursors. In compliance with EPA's
NOX SIP Call, North Carolina developed rules governing
the control of NOX emissions from Electric Generating
Units (EGUs), major non-EGU industrial boilers, major cement kilns,
and internal combustion engines. On December 27, 2002, EPA approved
North Carolina's rules as fulfilling Phase I (67 FR 78987).
\5\ On May 12, 2005 (70 FR 25162), EPA promulgated CAIR which
required 28 upwind States and the District of Columbia to revise
their SIPs to include control measures that would reduce emissions
of SO2 and NOX. Various aspects of CAIR rule
were petitioned in court and on December 23, 2008, the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit remanded CAIR to EPA
(see North Carolina v. EPA, 550 F.3d 1176 (D.C. Cir. 2008)) which
left CAIR in place to ``temporarily preserve the environmental
values covered by CAIR'' until EPA replaces it with a rule
consistent with the Court's ruling. The Court directed EPA to remedy
various areas of the rule that were petitioned consistent with its
July 11, 2008 (see North Carolina v. EPA, 531 F.3d 836 (D.C. Cir.,
July 11, 2008)), opinion, but declined to impose a schedule on EPA
for completing that action. Id. Therefore, CAIR is currently in
effect in North Carolina.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, EPA believes other section 110 elements that are
neither connected with nonattainment plan submissions nor linked with
an area's attainment status are applicable requirements for purposes of
redesignation. The area will still be subject to these requirements
after the area is redesignated. The section 110 and part D requirements
which are linked with a particular area's designation and
classification are the relevant measures to evaluate in reviewing a
redesignation request. This approach is consistent with EPA's existing
policy on applicability (i.e., for redesignations) of conformity and
oxygenated fuels requirements, as well as with section 184 ozone
transport requirements. See Reading, Pennsylvania, proposed and final
rulemakings (61 FR 53174-53176, October 10, 1996), (62 FR 24826, May 7,
1997); Cleveland-Akron-Loraine, Ohio, final rulemaking (61 FR 20458,
May 7, 1996); and Tampa, Florida, final rulemaking at (60 FR 62748,
December 7, 1995). See also the discussion on this issue in the
Cincinnati, Ohio, redesignation (65 FR 37890, June 19, 2000), and in
the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, redesignation (66 FR 50399, October 19,
2001).
EPA has not yet completed rulemaking on a submittal from North
Carolina dated April 1, 2008, addressing ``infrastructure SIP''
elements required under CAA section 110(a)(2). However, these are
statewide requirements that are not a consequence of the nonattainment
status of the Hickory Area. As stated above, EPA believes that section
110 elements not linked to an area's nonattainment status are not
applicable for purposes of redesignation. Therefore, notwithstanding
the fact that EPA has not yet completed rulemaking on North Carolina's
submittal for the PM2.5 infrastructure SIP elements of
section 110(a)(2), EPA believes it has approved all SIP elements under
section 110 that must be approved as a prerequisite for redesignating
the Hickory Area to attainment.
Title I, Part D requirements. EPA proposes that with approval of
North Carolina's base year emissions inventory, which is part of the
maintenance plan submittal, the North Carolina SIP will meet applicable
SIP requirements under part D of title I of the CAA. As discussed in
greater detail below, EPA believes the emissions inventory is
approvable because the 2008 direct PM2.5, SO2,
and NOX emissions for North Carolina were developed
consistent with EPA guidance for emissions inventories and represent a
comprehensive, accurate and current inventory as required by section
172(c)(3).
Part D, subpart 1 applicable SIP requirements. EPA has determined
that
[[Page 58216]]
if the approval of the base year emissions inventories, discussed in
section IX of this rulemaking, is finalized, the North Carolina SIP
will meet the applicable SIP requirements for the Hickory Area for
purposes of redesignation under title I, part D of the CAA. Subpart 1
of part D sets forth the basic nonattainment requirements applicable to
all nonattainment areas. All areas that were designated nonattainment
for the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS were designated under this
subpart of the CAA, and the requirements applicable to them are
contained in sections 172 and 176.
For purposes of evaluating this redesignation request, the
applicable part D, subpart 1 SIP requirements for all nonattainment
areas are contained in sections 172(c)(1)-(9) and in section 176. A
thorough discussion of the requirements contained in section 172 can be
found in the General Preamble for Implementation of title I (57 FR
13498, April 16, 1992).
Subpart 1 Section 172 Requirements. Section 172(c)(1) requires the
plans for all nonattainment areas to provide for the implementation of
all reasonably available control measures (RACM) as expeditiously as
practicable and to provide for attainment of the national primary
ambient air quality standards. EPA interprets this requirement to
impose a duty on all nonattainment areas to consider all available
control measures and to adopt and implement such measures as are
reasonably available for implementation in each area as components of
the area's attainment demonstration. Under section 172, states with
nonattainment areas must submit plans providing for timely attainment
and meeting a variety of other requirements. However, pursuant to 40
CFR 51.1004(c), EPA's January 5, 2010, determination that the Hickory
Area was attaining the PM2.5 standard suspended North
Carolina's obligation to submit most of the attainment planning
requirements that would otherwise apply. Specifically, the
determination of attainment suspended North Carolina's obligation to
submit an attainment demonstration and planning SIPs to provide for
reasonable further progress (RFP), reasonable available control
measures, and contingency measures under section 172(c)(9).
The General Preamble for Implementation of Title I (57 FR 13498,
April 16, 1992) also discusses the evaluation of these requirements in
the context of EPA's consideration of a redesignation request. The
General Preamble sets forth EPA's view of applicable requirements for
purposes of evaluating redesignation requests when an area is attaining
a standard (General Preamble for Implementation of Title I (57 FR
13498, April 16, 1992)).
Because attainment has been reached in the Hickory Area, no
additional measures are needed to provide for attainment, and section
172(c)(1) requirements for an attainment demonstration and RACM are no
longer considered to be applicable for purposes of redesignation as
long as the Area continues to attain the standard until redesignation.
See also 40 CFR 51.1004(c).
The RFP plan requirement under section 172(c)(2) is defined as
progress that must be made toward attainment. This requirement is not
relevant for purposes of redesignation because EPA has determined that
the Hickory Area has monitored attainment of the 1997 Annual
PM2.5 NAAQS. See General Preamble, 57 FR 13564. See also 40
CFR 51.1004 (c). In addition, because the Hickory Area has attained the
1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS and is no longer subject to a RFP
requirement, the requirement to submit the section 172(c)(9)
contingency measures is not applicable for purposes of redesignation.
Id.
Section 172(c)(3) requires submission and approval of a
comprehensive, accurate, and current inventory of actual emissions. As
part of North Carolina's redesignation request for the Hickory Area,
North Carolina submitted a 2008 base year emissions inventory. As
discussed below in section IX, EPA is proposing to approve the 2008
base year inventory submitted with the redesignation request as meeting
the section 172(c)(3) emissions inventory requirement.
Section 172(c)(4) requires the identification and quantification of
allowable emissions for major new and modified stationary sources to be
allowed in an area, and section 172(c)(5) requires source permits for
the construction and operation of new and modified major stationary
sources anywhere in the nonattainment area. EPA has determined that,
since PSD requirements will apply after redesignation, areas being
redesignated need not comply with the requirement that a NSR program be
approved prior to redesignation, provided that the area demonstrates
maintenance of the NAAQS without part D NSR. A more detailed rationale
for this view is described in a memorandum from Mary Nichols, Assistant
Administrator for Air and Radiation, dated October 14, 1994, entitled,
``Part D New Source Review Requirements for Areas Requesting
Redesignation to Attainment.'' North Carolina has demonstrated that the
Hickory Area will be able to maintain the NAAQS without part D NSR in
effect and therefore North Carolina need not have fully approved part D
NSR programs prior to approval of the redesignation request.
Nonetheless, North Carolina currently has a fully-approved part D NSR
program in place. North Carolina's PSD program will become effective in
the Hickory Area upon redesignation to attainment. Section 172(c)(6)
requires the SIP to contain control measures necessary to provide for
attainment of the NAAQS. Because attainment has been reached, no
additional measures are needed to provide for attainment.
Section 172(c)(7) requires the SIP to meet the applicable
provisions of section 110(a)(2). As noted above, EPA believes the North
Carolina SIP meets the requirements of section 110(a)(2) applicable for
purposes of redesignation.
Section 176 Conformity Requirements. Section 176(c) of the CAA
requires states to establish criteria and procedures to ensure that
Federally supported or funded projects conform to the air quality
planning goals in the applicable SIP. The requirement to determine
conformity applies to transportation plans, programs and projects that
are developed, funded or approved under title 23 of the United States
Code (U.S.C.) and the Federal Transit Act (transportation conformity)
as well as to all other Federally supported or funded projects (general
conformity). State transportation conformity SIP revisions must be
consistent with Federal conformity regulations relating to
consultation, enforcement and enforceability that EPA promulgated
pursuant to its authority under the CAA.
EPA interprets the conformity SIP requirements \6\ as not applying
for purposes of evaluating a redesignation request under section 107(d)
because state conformity rules are still required after redesignation
and Federal conformity rules apply where state rules have not been
approved. See Wall v. EPA, 265 F.3d 426 (6th Cir. 2001)(upholding this
interpretation); see also 60 FR 62748 (December 7, 1995, Tampa,
Florida). Thus, the Hickory Area has satisfied all applicable
requirements for purposes of redesignation under
[[Page 58217]]
section 110 and part D of title I of the CAA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ CAA Section 176(c)(4)(E) requires states to submit revisions
to their SIPs to reflect certain Federal criteria and procedures for
determining transportation conformity. Transportation conformity
SIPs are different from the MVEBs that are established in control
strategy SIPs and maintenance plans.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
b. The Hickory Area Has a Fully Approved Applicable SIP Under Section
110(k) of the CAA
If EPA issues a final approval of the base year emissions
inventories, EPA will have fully approved the applicable North Carolina
SIP for the Hickory Area under section 110(k) of the CAA for all
requirements applicable for purposes of redesignation for the 1997
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA may rely on prior SIP approvals in
approving a redesignation request (see Calcagni Memorandum at p. 3;
Southwestern Pennsylvania Growth Alliance v. Browner, 144 F.3d 984,
989-90 (6th Cir. 1998); Wall, 265 F.3d 426) plus any additional
measures it may approve in conjunction with a redesignation action (see
68 FR 25426 (May 12, 2003) and citations therein). Following passage of
the CAA of 1970, North Carolina has adopted and submitted, and EPA has
fully approved at various times, provisions addressing the various 1997
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS SIP elements applicable in the Hickory
Area (April 17, 1980, 45 FR 26038; August 27, 1981, 46 FR 43137;
October 11, 1985, 50 FR 41501; November 19, 1986, 51 FR 41786; and
December 19, 1986, 51 FR 45468).
As indicated above, EPA believes that the section 110 elements that
are neither connected with nonattainment plan submissions nor linked to
an area's nonattainment status are not applicable requirements for
purposes of redesignation. In addition, EPA believes that since the
part D subpart 1 requirements did not become due prior to submission of
the redesignation request, they are also not applicable requirements
for purposes of redesignation. Sierra Club v. EPA, 375 F.3d 537 (7th
Cir. 2004); 68 FR 25424, 25427 (May 12, 2003) (redesignation of the St.
Louis-East St. Louis Area to attainment of the 1-hour ozone NAAQS).
With the approval of the emissions inventory, EPA will have approved
all Part D subpart 1 requirements applicable for purposes of this
redesignation.
Criteria (3)--The Air Quality Improvement in the Hickory Area 1997
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS Nonattainment Area Is Due to Permanent and
Enforceable Reductions in Emissions Resulting From Implementation of
the SIP and Applicable Federal Air Pollution Control Regulations and
Other Permanent and Enforceable Reductions
For redesignating a nonattainment area to attainment, the CAA
requires EPA to determine that the air quality improvement in the area
is due to permanent and enforceable reductions in emissions resulting
from implementation of the SIP and applicable Federal air pollution
control regulations and other permanent and enforceable reductions (CAA
section 107(d)(3)(E)(iii)). EPA believes North Carolina has
demonstrated that the observed air quality improvement in the Hickory
Area is due to permanent and enforceable reductions resulting from
implementation of the SIP, Federal measures, and other state adopted
measures.
Fine particulate matter, or PM2.5, refers to airborne
particles less than or equal to 2.5 micrometers in diameter. Although
treated as a single pollutant, fine particles come from many different
sources and are composed of many different compounds. One of the
largest components of PM2.5 in the southeastern United
States is sulfate, which is formed through various chemical reactions
from the precursor SO2. The other major component of
PM2.5 is organic carbon, which originates predominantly from
biogenic emission sources. Nitrate, which is formed from the precursor
NOX, is also a component of PM2.5. Crustal
materials from windblown dust and elemental carbon from combustion
sources are less significant contributors to total PM2.5.
State and Federal measures enacted in recent years have resulted in
permanent emission reductions. Most of these emission reductions are
enforceable through regulations. A few non-regulatory measures also
result in emission reductions.
The Federal measures that have been implemented include:
Tier 2 vehicle standards. In addition to requiring NOX
controls, the Tier 2 rule reduced the allowable sulfur content of
gasoline to 30 parts per million (ppm) starting in January of 2006.
Most gasoline sold in North Carolina prior to this had a sulfur content
of approximately 300 ppm.
Heavy-duty gasoline and diesel highway vehicle standards. The
second phase of the standards and testing procedures, which began in
2007, reduces particulate matter (PM) and NOX from heavy-
duty highway engines and also reduces highway diesel fuel sulfur
content to 15 ppm. The total program is expected to achieve a 90 and 95
percent reduction in PM and NOX emissions from heavy-duty
highway engines, respectively.
Nonroad spark-ignition engines and recreational engines standards.
Tier 1 of this standard, implemented in 2004, and Tier 2, implemented
in 2007, have reduced and will continue to reduce PM emissions.
Large nonroad diesel engine standards. Promulgated in 2004, this
rule is being phased in between 2008 and 2014. This rule will reduce
sulfur content in nonroad diesel fuel and, when fully implemented, will
reduce NOX and direct PM2.5 emissions by over 90
percent from these engines.
CAIR and the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR). As previously
discussed, the remanded CAIR, originally promulgated to reduce
transported pollution, was left in place to ``temporarily preserve the
environmental values covered by CAIR'' until EPA replaced it with a
rule consistent with the Court's opinion. To remedy CAIR's flaws, EPA
promulgated the final CSAPR on August 8, 2011. CSAPR addresses the
interstate transport requirements of the CAA with respect to the 1997
ozone, 1997 PM2.5 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. As noted
previously, the requirements of CAIR address emissions thru the 2011
control period and CSAPR requires similar or greater emission
reductions in the relevant areas in 2012 and beyond.
The state measures that have been implemented to date and relied
upon by North Carolina to demonstrate attainment and/or maintenance
include:
NCCSA. The primary state-adopted measure is the NCCSA, enacted in
June 2002. The NCCSA includes a schedule of system-wide caps on
emissions of NOX and SO2, the first of which
became effective in 2007, and has no provision for the trading of
pollution credits from one utility to another. According to North
Carolina, this rule requires coal-fired power plants in the State to
reduce annual NOX emissions from 245,000 tons in 1998 to
56,000 tons by 2009 (a 77 percent reduction) and to reduce annual
SO2 emissions from 489,000 tons in 1998 to 250,000 tons by
2009 (a 49 percent reduction), and further SO2 reductions to
130,000 tons in 2013 (a 73 percent reduction). Although there are no
power plants located within the Hickory Area, there are power plants
located around the Area. On August 21, 2009, North Carolina submitted a
SIP revision to incorporate specific provisions of the NCCSA into the
Federally approved SIP. On June 22, 2011, EPA proposed approval of the
NCCSA rules as a revision to the SIP and expects to take final action
on it in a rulemaking separate from today's proposed action but prior
to any final action on this redesignation.
Another significant rulemaking which has led to permanent and
enforceable reductions is the NOX SIP Call rule. This rule
was predicted to reduce
[[Page 58218]]
summertime NOX emissions from power plants and other
industries by over 60 percent in North Carolina by 2006. See Table III-
5 of NOX SIP Call, 63 FR 57356, 57434 (October 27, 1998).
These emission reductions are state and Federally enforceable.
Table 2 presents the annual emissions from North Carolina sources
as recorded in EPA's acid rain database. Since 2002, when the
NOX controls started coming on-line to meet the
NOX SIP Call, and later to meet the NCCSA, the annual
NOX emissions from subject sources have decreased
dramatically from 145,706 tons per year (tpy) in 2002 to 61,669 tpy in
2008. In 2009 the emissions decreased to 44,506 tpy--down more than 69
percent from 2002. Between 2005 and 2008, the annual SO2
emissions from the utilities in North Carolina decreased by more than
half from 500,936 tpy to 227,030 tpy, or nearly 274,000 tons reduced.
In 2009 the emissions were again halved, down 76 percent from 2002. The
decline in SO2 emissions has coincided with a decline in
annual PM2.5 concentrations across North Carolina.
Table 2--Annual Emissions From All NC Sources in the EPA Clean Air
Markets Database
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual SO2 Annual NOX
Year emissions (tons) emissions (tons)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2002................................ 462,993 145,706
2003................................ 462,041 135,879
2004................................ 472,320 124,079
2005................................ 500,936 114,300
2006................................ 462,143 108,584
2007................................ 370,827 64,770
2008................................ 227,030 61,669
2009................................ 110,948 44,506
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other state measures have been implemented that are state
enforceable but not a part of the Federally-enforceable SIP. Such
measures contribute to reductions in pollutant emissions, although to a
lesser extent than the ones identified above, and include the
following:
Clean Air Bill. This state legislation expanded the inspection and
maintenance program from 9 counties to 48 counties and was phased in
for the Hickory Area from July 1, 2002, through July 1, 2003. This
program reduces NOX, VOC, and carbon monoxide (CO)
emissions.
Open burning. This regulation, originally approved in 1997,
prohibits the burning of man-made materials throughout the State.
Additionally, this regulation prohibits open burning of yard waste in
areas for which the DAQ forecasts an air quality action day. The open
burning regulation will reduce PM2.5 emissions, as well as
NOX, VOC and CO emissions.
Diesel Retrofits. As part of the North Carolina Mobile Source
Emission Reduction Grants program, a number of cities, counties and
school districts have installed diesel oxidation catalysts or diesel
particulate filters on their diesel equipment. The vehicles that have
been retrofitted include school buses and county fleet trucks used for
solid waste pickup. These types of filters are designed to reduce PM
engine emissions, and when used with ultra low sulfur diesel fuel,
NOX and VOC emissions are also reduced. Even though these
emission reductions are voluntary and not enforceable, they are still
considered permanent reductions.
Diesel Emissions Reduction Act (DERA). DERA provides new diesel
emissions reduction grant authority for EPA. This funding is used to
achieve significant reductions in diesel emissions that improve air
quality and protect public health. The DERA funds that the DAQ has
received have been used to retrofit, repower, or replace existing
diesel engines from on-road and nonroad mobile source vehicles and
equipment. This program will reduce PM, NOX, and VOC
emissions. Even though these emission reductions are voluntary, they
are still considered permanent reductions once a retrofit is completed.
To date, North Carolina has retrofitted over 6,000 diesel school buses.
In addition to impacting local emissions in the nonattainment area,
most of these measures impact emissions statewide.
EPA agrees with North Carolina's assessment that, although
PM2.5 and PM2.5 precursor reductions within the
nonattainment area have contributed to improved air quality, the
majority of the improvement in ambient PM2.5 concentrations
has resulted from reductions in SO2 emissions from in-state
coal-fired power plants due to the NCCSA. The annual emissions from
these facilities have significantly decreased since 2005, with over
250,000 tons of SO2 emission reductions in 2008 compared to
2005. EPA's analysis of emissions data available in from the Clean Air
Markets Division Web site (https://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/) shows that
the statewide reductions in SO2 emissions are much greater
than any decreases in emissions that can be attributed to decreases in
demand associated with reductions in operating hours or heat inputs at
North Carolina power plants. While coal-fired electric power generation
in North Carolina decreased 4.8 percent from 2005 to 2008,\7\
SO2 emissions from coal-fired electric power plants declined
46.0 percent during the same period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Electric Power Annual 2009, DOE/EIA-0348(2009), North
Carolina Electricity Profile, Tables 5 and 7. April 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NCCSA reductions took place beginning in 2006, the first year
of the 3-year attainment period submitted by North Carolina for
redesignation of the Hickory Area. Since the final compliance date for
the NCCSA SO2 emissions caps is 2013, future design values
are expected to continue to decline below the 2006-2008 attaining
design values. The significant statewide reductions in utility
SO2 emissions will be permanent and enforceable upon EPA's
approval of the NCCSA rules into the North Carolina SIP. Further, EPA
does not have any information to suggest t