Electric Reliability Organization Interpretation of Transmission Operations Reliability Standard, 58101-58103 [2011-24088]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 18 CFR Part 40 [Docket No. RM10–29–000; Order No. 753] Electric Reliability Organization Interpretation of Transmission Operations Reliability Standard September 15, 2011. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: Under section 215 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approves the North American Electric Reliability Corporation’s proposed interpretation of Reliability Standard, TOP–001–1, Requirement R8, which pertains to the restoration of real and reactive power during a system emergency. SUMMARY: Effective Date: This rule will become effective November 21, 2011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert T. Stroh (Legal Information), Office of the General Counsel, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, Telephone: (202) 502–8473. Eugene Blick (Technical Information), Office of Electric Reliability, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, Telephone: (202) 502–8066. David O’Connor (Technical Information), Office of Electric Reliability, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, Telephone: (202) 502–6695. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Before Commissioners: Jon Wellinghoff, Chairman; Marc Spitzer, Philip D. Moeller, John R. Norris, and Cheryl A. LaFleur. DATES: sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES Final Rule 1. Under section 215 of the Federal Power Act (FPA),1 the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approves the North American Electric Reliability Corporation’s (NERC) proposed interpretation of Requirement R8 in Commission-approved NERC Reliability Standard TOP–001–1—Reliability Responsibilities and Authorities. I. Background 2. Section 215 of the FPA requires a Commission-certified Electric 1 16 U.S.C. 824o (2006). VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:50 Sep 19, 2011 Jkt 223001 58101 Reliability Organization (ERO) to develop mandatory and enforceable Reliability Standards, which are subject to Commission review and approval. Approved Reliability Standards are enforced by the ERO, subject to Commission oversight, or by the Commission independently. 3. Pursuant to section 215 of the FPA, the Commission established a process to select and certify an ERO 2 and, subsequently, certified NERC as the ERO.3 On March 16, 2007, the Commission issued Order No. 693, approving 83 of the 107 Reliability Standards filed by NERC, including Reliability Standard TOP–001–1.4 4. NERC’s Rules of Procedure provide that a person that is ‘‘directly and materially affected’’ by Bulk-Power System reliability may request an interpretation of a Reliability Standard.5 The ERO’s ‘‘standards process manager’’ will assemble a team with relevant expertise to address the requested interpretation and also form a ballot pool. NERC’s Rules provide that, within 45 days, the team will draft an interpretation of the Reliability Standard, with subsequent balloting. If approved by ballot, the interpretation is appended to the Reliability Standard and filed with the applicable regulatory authority for regulatory approval. and Reactive Power Balance. If the Balancing Authority or Transmission Operator is unable to restore Real and Reactive Power Balance it shall request emergency assistance from the Reliability Coordinator. If corrective action or emergency assistance is not adequate to mitigate the Real and Reactive Power Balance, then the Reliability Coordinator, Balancing Authority, and Transmission Operator shall implement firm load shedding.6 A. Reliability Standard TOP–001–1 5. Reliability Standard TOP–001–1 (Reliability Responsibilities and Authorities) centers on the responsibilities of balancing authorities and transmission operators during a system emergency. Specifically, the stated purpose of Reliability Standard TOP–001–1 is to ensure reliability entities have clear decision-making authority and capabilities to take appropriate actions or direct the actions of others to return the transmission system to normal conditions during an emergency. Requirement R8 of the standard provides: 7. Consistent with the NERC Rules of Procedure, NERC stated that it assembled a team to respond to the request for interpretation and presented the proposed interpretation to industry ballot, using a process similar to the process it uses for the development of Reliability Standards.8 8. In response to FMPP’s interpretation request, NERC provided the following: During a system emergency, the Balancing Authority and Transmission Operator shall immediately take action to restore the Real 2 Rules Concerning Certification of the Electric Reliability Organization; and Procedures for the Establishment, Approval and Enforcement of Electric Reliability Standards, Order No. 672, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,204, order on reh’g, Order No. 672–A, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,212 (2006). 3 North American Electric Reliability Corp., 116 FERC ¶ 61,062, order on reh’g & compliance, 117 FERC ¶ 61,126 (2006), aff’d sub nom. Alcoa, Inc. v. FERC, 564 F.3d 1342 (D.C. Cir. 2009). 4 Mandatory Reliability Standards for the BulkPower System, Order No. 693, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,242, order on reh’g, Order No. 693–A, 120 FERC ¶ 61,053 (2007). 5 NERC Rules of Procedure, Appendix 3A, Reliability Standards Development Procedure, Version 6.1, at 27–29 (2010). PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 B. NERC Proposed Interpretation 6. On July 16, 2010, NERC submitted its petition for approval for an interpretation of Requirement R8 in Commission-approved Reliability Standard TOP–001–1. The Petition explains that NERC received a request from Florida Municipal Power Pool (FMPP) seeking an interpretation of Reliability Standard TOP–001–1, Requirement R8. Specifically, FMPP requested clarification on several aspects of Requirement R8. FMPP asked the following: Balancing real power is not a function of a [Transmission Operator] and balancing reactive power is not a function of a [Balancing Authority]. For Requirement R8 is the Balancing Authority responsibility to immediately take corrective action to restore Real Power Balance and is the [Transmission Operator] responsibility to immediately take corrective action to restore Reactive Power Balance? 7 The answer to both questions is yes. According to the NERC Glossary of Terms Used in Reliability Standards, the Transmission Operator is responsible for the reliability of its ‘‘local’’ transmission system, and operates or directs the operations of the transmission facilities. Similarly, the Balancing Authority is responsible for maintaining load-interchange-generation balance, i.e., real power balance. In the context of this requirement, the Transmission Operator is the functional entity that balances reactive power. Reactive power balancing can be accomplished by issuing instructions to the Balancing Authority or Generator Operators to alter reactive power injection. Based on NERC Reliability Standard BAL–005–1b Requirement R6, the Transmission Operator has no requirement to 6 Reliability Standard TOP–001–1, Requirement R8. 7 NERC Petition at 5. Reliability Standards Development Procedure at 27–29. 8 NERC E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM 20SER1 58102 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Rules and Regulations compute an Area Control Error (ACE) signal or to balance real power. Based on NERC Reliability Standard VAR–001–1 Requirement R8, the Balancing Authority is not required to resolve reactive power balance issues. According to TOP–001–1\ Requirement R3, the Balancing Authority is only required to comply with Transmission Operator or Reliability Coordinator instructions to change injections of reactive power.9 NERC stated that the interpretation was developed and approved by industry stakeholders and approved by the NERC Board of Trustees (Board). 9. The NERC petition explained that the interpretation is consistent with the stated purpose of the Reliability Standard, which is to ensure reliability entities have clear decision-making authority and capabilities to take appropriate actions or direct the actions of others to return the transmission system to normal conditions during an emergency. NERC added that the interpretation clarifies the responsibilities of balancing authorities and transmission operators during a system emergency by referencing the NERC Glossary of Terms Used in Reliability Standards as well as other relevant Reliability Standards.10 10. On February 14, 2011, NERC made a supplemental filing in response to a Commission staff data request.11 With regard to whether Requirement R8 obligates a joint response in a system emergency, NERC explained that Requirement R8 does not use the word ‘‘joint’’ or otherwise infer joint responsibility during system emergencies. Rather, NERC responded that the balancing authority and transmission operator have separate responsibilities to restore real and reactive power balance during system emergencies. NERC also stated that the use of ‘‘and’’ between the two entities should not construe communication or coordination. NERC added that the Blackout Report 12 correctly identifies communication and coordination issues as reliability issues and that communication and coordination are addressed in the Communications (COM) Reliability Standards.13 II. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 11. On April 21, 2011, the Commission issued a Notice of sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES 9 Id. at 5–6. at 6. 11 Response of the North American Electric Reliability Corporation to Request for Additional Information Regarding Interpretation to Reliability Standard TOP–001–1, Requirement R8 (NERC Response). 12 Final Report on the August 14, 2003 Blackout in the United States and Canada (Blackout Report). 13 NERC Response at 4–7. 10 Id. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:50 Sep 19, 2011 Jkt 223001 Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) proposing to approve NERC’s interpretation of Reliability Standard TOP–001–1, Requirement R8.14 In the NOPR, the Commission stated that it believed that the ERO has presented a reasonable interpretation consistent with the language of the Reliability Standard. In addition, the NOPR noted that a balancing authority and transmission operator each have coordination and communication functions that are necessary for maintaining real and reactive power balance. 12. In response to the NOPR, NERC filed comments supporting the Commission’s proposed approval of the interpretation. No comments were filed opposing the Commission’s proposal to approve NERC’s interpretation. III. Commission Determination 13. The Commission adopts the NOPR proposal and approves the interpretation of TOP–001–1, Requirement R8. The Commission finds that NERC’s interpretation is just, reasonable, not unduly discriminatory or preferential, and in the public interest. 14. The interpretation supports the stated purpose of the Reliability Standard, i.e., ensuring that reliability entities have clear decision-making authority and capabilities to take appropriate actions or direct the actions of others to return the transmission system to normal conditions during an emergency.15 The interpretation also clarifies the responsibilities of a balancing authority and transmission operator during a system emergency. Further, the language is consistent with the language of the requirement. Accordingly, the Commission approves the ERO’s interpretation of TOP–001–1, Requirement R8. 15. We agree, as discussed in the interpretation, that the balancing authority is responsible for restoring real power balance during a system emergency and the transmission operator is responsible for restoring reactive power balance during a system emergency. However, during a system emergency, communication and coordination between the transmission operator and balancing authority can be essential to restore real and reactive power balance. For example, during an emergency, the balancing authority may rely on the real power output of a 14 Electric Reliability Organization Interpretation of Transmission Operations Reliability Standard, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 76 FR 23222 (Apr. 26, 2011), FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 32,674 (2011) (NOPR). 15 Id. at 6. PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 generator to fulfill its responsibility, while the transmission operator may expect the same generator unit to reduce real power to generate greater reactive power output.16 16. NERC acknowledges the need for such communication and coordination.17 NERC maintains that this coordination and communication is required through two currently-effective Communication Reliability Standards: (1) COM–001–1.1— Telecommunications and (2) COM–002– 2—Communication and Coordination.18 17. We agree with NERC that the currently effective COM Reliability Standards provide for such communication and coordination. For example, Reliability Standard COM– 002–2, Requirement R1 provides that transmission operators, balancing authorities and generator operators must have communication links with one another and must be staffed to address a real-time emergency. Reliability Standard EOP–001–0, Requirements R3, R4.3, and R7 also contain provisions relevant to the need for communication and coordination in emergencies.19 These provisions require balancing authorities and transmission operators to develop plans to mitigate operating emergencies including coordination among adjacent transmission operators and balancing authorities. 18. Accordingly, for the reasons discussed above, we approve NERC’s proposed interpretation of TOP–001–1, Requirement R8. IV. Information Collection Statement 19. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) regulations require that OMB approve certain reporting and recordkeeping requirements (collections of information) imposed by an agency.20 The information contained here is also 16 The Blackout Report described such a scenario, explaining that a generator unit tripped because the unit’s protection system detected the VAR output, i.e., reactive power, exceeded the unit’s capability. Blackout Report at 27. The Blackout Report also explained that no generator units were asked to reduce their real power output to produce more reactive power. Id. at 47. 17 NERC Response at 6–7. 18 NERC Response at 6–7. NERC also identifies several ongoing Reliability Standards projects that are intended to strengthen the requirements pertaining to communication and coordination between entities. 19 See NOPR, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 32,674 at P 14. On July 13, 2011, the Commission approved EOP–001–2 Reliability Standard, replacing EOP– 001–0 effective July 1, 2013. Mandatory Reliability Standards for Interconnection Reliability Operating Limits; System Restoration Reliability Standards, 136 FERC ¶ 61,030 (2011). The applicable Requirements in EOP–001–2 relevant to the need for communication and coordination in emergencies are Requirements R2, R3.3, and R6. 20 5 CFR 1320.11. E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM 20SER1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Rules and Regulations subject to review under section 3507(d) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.21 20. As stated above, the Commission approved, in Order No. 693, Reliability Standard TOP–001–1 that is the subject of the current rulemaking. This Final Rule approves the interpretation of the previously approved Reliability Standard, which was developed by NERC as the ERO. The interpretation, as clarified, relates to an existing Reliability Standard, and the Commission does not expect it to affect entities’ current reporting burden.22 Accordingly, we will submit this Final Rule to OMB for informational purposes only. 21. Interested persons may obtain information on the reporting requirements by contacting the following: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426 [Attention: Ellen Brown, Office of the Executive Director, e-mail: DataClearance@ferc.gov, Phone: (202) 502–8663, fax: (202) 273–0873]. V. Environmental Analysis 22. The Commission is required to prepare an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement for any action that may have a significant adverse effect on the human environment.23 The Commission has categorically excluded certain actions from this requirement as not having a significant effect on the human environment. Included in the exclusion are rules that are clarifying, corrective, or procedural or that do not substantially change the effect of the regulations being amended.24 The actions proposed herein fall within this categorical exclusion in the Commission’s regulations. sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act 23. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA) 25 generally requires a description and analysis of final rules that will have significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The RFA mandates consideration of regulatory alternatives that accomplish the stated objectives of a final rule and that minimize any significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The Small Business Administration’s 21 44 U.S.C. 3507(d). Order No. 693, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,242 at P 1901–1907. 23 Regulations Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897 (Dec. 17, 1987), FERC Stats. & Regs. Preambles 1986–1990 ¶ 30,783 (1987). 24 18 CFR 380.4(a)(2)(ii). 25 5 U.S.C. 601–612. 22 See VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:50 Sep 19, 2011 Jkt 223001 (SBA) Office of Size Standards develops the numerical definition of a small business.26 The SBA has established a size standard for electric utilities, stating that a firm is small if, including its affiliates, it is primarily engaged in the transmission, generation and/or distribution of electric energy for sale and its total electric output for the preceding twelve months did not exceed four million megawatt hours.27 The RFA is not implicated by this Final Rule because the interpretations discussed herein will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 24. The Commission approved Reliability Standard TOP–001–1 in 2007 in Order No. 693. The Final Rule in the immediate docket addresses an interpretation of Requirement R8 of previously-approved TOP–001–1. The interpretation clarifies current compliance obligations of balancing authorities and transmission operators and therefore, does not create an additional regulatory impact on small entities. 58103 VIII. Effective Date and Congressional Notification 28. These regulations are effective November 21, 2011. The Commission has determined, with the concurrence of the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB, that this rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined in section 351 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. List of Subjects in 18 CFR Part 40 Electric power, Electric utilities, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. By the Commission. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2011–24088 Filed 9–19–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary [Docket ID: DoD–2011–OS–0004] 32 CFR Part 311 VII. Document Availability 25. In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the Internet through FERC’s Home Page (https://www.ferc.gov) and in FERC’s Public Reference Room during normal business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. eastern time) at 888 First Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426. 26. From FERC’s Home Page on the Internet, this information is available on eLibrary. The full text of this document is available on eLibrary in PDF and Microsoft Word format for viewing, printing, and/or downloading. To access this document in eLibrary, type the docket number excluding the last three digits of this document in the docket number field. 27. User assistance is available for eLibrary and the FERC’s website during normal business hours from FERC Online Support at 202–502–6652 (toll free at 1–866–208–3676) or e-mail at ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov, or the Public Reference Room at (202) 502– 8371, TTY (202) 502–8659. E-mail the Public Reference Room at public.referenceroom@ferc.gov. 26 13 27 13 PO 00000 CFR 121.101. CFR 121.201, Section 22, Utilities, & n.1. Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation Office of the Secretary, DoD. Direct final rule with request for comments. AGENCY: ACTION: The Office of the Secretary of Defense is exempting those records contained in DMDC 14 DoD, entitled ‘‘Defense Clearance and Investigations Index (DCII)’’, pertaining to investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes to enable OSD components to conduct certain investigations and relay law enforcement information without compromise of the information, protect investigative techniques and efforts employed, and identities of confidential sources who might not otherwise come forward and who furnished information under an express promise that the sources’ identity would be held in confidence. The exemption will allow DoD to provide protection against notification of investigatory material including certain reciprocal investigations and counterintelligence information, which might alert a subject to the fact that an investigation of that individual is taking place, and the disclosure of which would weaken the on-going investigation, reveal investigatory techniques, and place confidential informants in jeopardy who furnished information under an express promise that the sources’ identity would be held in confidence. Further, SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM 20SER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 20, 2011)]
[Unknown Section]
[Pages 58101-58103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24088]



[[Page 58101]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

18 CFR Part 40

[Docket No. RM10-29-000; Order No. 753]


Electric Reliability Organization Interpretation of Transmission 
Operations Reliability Standard

September 15, 2011.
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under section 215 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission approves the North American Electric 
Reliability Corporation's proposed interpretation of Reliability 
Standard, TOP-001-1, Requirement R8, which pertains to the restoration 
of real and reactive power during a system emergency.

DATES: Effective Date: This rule will become effective November 21, 
2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 
Robert T. Stroh (Legal Information), Office of the General Counsel, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, Telephone: (202) 502-8473.
Eugene Blick (Technical Information), Office of Electric Reliability, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, Telephone: (202) 502-8066.
David O'Connor (Technical Information), Office of Electric Reliability, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, Telephone: (202) 502-6695.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Before Commissioners: Jon Wellinghoff, 
Chairman; Marc Spitzer, Philip D. Moeller, John R. Norris, and Cheryl 
A. LaFleur.

Final Rule

    1. Under section 215 of the Federal Power Act (FPA),\1\ the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission approves the North American Electric 
Reliability Corporation's (NERC) proposed interpretation of Requirement 
R8 in Commission-approved NERC Reliability Standard TOP-001-1--
Reliability Responsibilities and Authorities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 16 U.S.C. 824o (2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Background

    2. Section 215 of the FPA requires a Commission-certified Electric 
Reliability Organization (ERO) to develop mandatory and enforceable 
Reliability Standards, which are subject to Commission review and 
approval. Approved Reliability Standards are enforced by the ERO, 
subject to Commission oversight, or by the Commission independently.
    3. Pursuant to section 215 of the FPA, the Commission established a 
process to select and certify an ERO \2\ and, subsequently, certified 
NERC as the ERO.\3\ On March 16, 2007, the Commission issued Order No. 
693, approving 83 of the 107 Reliability Standards filed by NERC, 
including Reliability Standard TOP-001-1.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Rules Concerning Certification of the Electric Reliability 
Organization; and Procedures for the Establishment, Approval and 
Enforcement of Electric Reliability Standards, Order No. 672, FERC 
Stats. & Regs. ] 31,204, order on reh'g, Order No. 672-A, FERC 
Stats. & Regs. ] 31,212 (2006).
    \3\ North American Electric Reliability Corp., 116 FERC ] 
61,062, order on reh'g & compliance, 117 FERC ] 61,126 (2006), aff'd 
sub nom. Alcoa, Inc. v. FERC, 564 F.3d 1342 (D.C. Cir. 2009).
    \4\ Mandatory Reliability Standards for the Bulk-Power System, 
Order No. 693, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,242, order on reh'g, Order 
No. 693-A, 120 FERC ] 61,053 (2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    4. NERC's Rules of Procedure provide that a person that is 
``directly and materially affected'' by Bulk-Power System reliability 
may request an interpretation of a Reliability Standard.\5\ The ERO's 
``standards process manager'' will assemble a team with relevant 
expertise to address the requested interpretation and also form a 
ballot pool. NERC's Rules provide that, within 45 days, the team will 
draft an interpretation of the Reliability Standard, with subsequent 
balloting. If approved by ballot, the interpretation is appended to the 
Reliability Standard and filed with the applicable regulatory authority 
for regulatory approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ NERC Rules of Procedure, Appendix 3A, Reliability Standards 
Development Procedure, Version 6.1, at 27-29 (2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Reliability Standard TOP-001-1

    5. Reliability Standard TOP-001-1 (Reliability Responsibilities and 
Authorities) centers on the responsibilities of balancing authorities 
and transmission operators during a system emergency. Specifically, the 
stated purpose of Reliability Standard TOP-001-1 is to ensure 
reliability entities have clear decision-making authority and 
capabilities to take appropriate actions or direct the actions of 
others to return the transmission system to normal conditions during an 
emergency. Requirement R8 of the standard provides:

    During a system emergency, the Balancing Authority and 
Transmission Operator shall immediately take action to restore the 
Real and Reactive Power Balance. If the Balancing Authority or 
Transmission Operator is unable to restore Real and Reactive Power 
Balance it shall request emergency assistance from the Reliability 
Coordinator. If corrective action or emergency assistance is not 
adequate to mitigate the Real and Reactive Power Balance, then the 
Reliability Coordinator, Balancing Authority, and Transmission 
Operator shall implement firm load shedding.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Reliability Standard TOP-001-1, Requirement R8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. NERC Proposed Interpretation

    6. On July 16, 2010, NERC submitted its petition for approval for 
an interpretation of Requirement R8 in Commission-approved Reliability 
Standard TOP-001-1. The Petition explains that NERC received a request 
from Florida Municipal Power Pool (FMPP) seeking an interpretation of 
Reliability Standard TOP-001-1, Requirement R8. Specifically, FMPP 
requested clarification on several aspects of Requirement R8. FMPP 
asked the following:

    Balancing real power is not a function of a [Transmission 
Operator] and balancing reactive power is not a function of a 
[Balancing Authority]. For Requirement R8 is the Balancing Authority 
responsibility to immediately take corrective action to restore Real 
Power Balance and is the [Transmission Operator] responsibility to 
immediately take corrective action to restore Reactive Power 
Balance? \7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ NERC Petition at 5.

    7. Consistent with the NERC Rules of Procedure, NERC stated that it 
assembled a team to respond to the request for interpretation and 
presented the proposed interpretation to industry ballot, using a 
process similar to the process it uses for the development of 
Reliability Standards.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ NERC Reliability Standards Development Procedure at 27-29.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    8. In response to FMPP's interpretation request, NERC provided the 
following:

    The answer to both questions is yes. According to the NERC 
Glossary of Terms Used in Reliability Standards, the Transmission 
Operator is responsible for the reliability of its ``local'' 
transmission system, and operates or directs the operations of the 
transmission facilities. Similarly, the Balancing Authority is 
responsible for maintaining load-interchange-generation balance, 
i.e., real power balance. In the context of this requirement, the 
Transmission Operator is the functional entity that balances 
reactive power. Reactive power balancing can be accomplished by 
issuing instructions to the Balancing Authority or Generator 
Operators to alter reactive power injection. Based on NERC 
Reliability Standard BAL-005-1b Requirement R6, the Transmission 
Operator has no requirement to

[[Page 58102]]

compute an Area Control Error (ACE) signal or to balance real power. 
Based on NERC Reliability Standard VAR-001-1 Requirement R8, the 
Balancing Authority is not required to resolve reactive power 
balance issues. According to TOP-001-1[bsol] Requirement R3, the 
Balancing Authority is only required to comply with Transmission 
Operator or Reliability Coordinator instructions to change 
injections of reactive power.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Id. at 5-6.

    NERC stated that the interpretation was developed and approved by 
industry stakeholders and approved by the NERC Board of Trustees 
(Board).
    9. The NERC petition explained that the interpretation is 
consistent with the stated purpose of the Reliability Standard, which 
is to ensure reliability entities have clear decision-making authority 
and capabilities to take appropriate actions or direct the actions of 
others to return the transmission system to normal conditions during an 
emergency. NERC added that the interpretation clarifies the 
responsibilities of balancing authorities and transmission operators 
during a system emergency by referencing the NERC Glossary of Terms 
Used in Reliability Standards as well as other relevant Reliability 
Standards.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Id. at 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    10. On February 14, 2011, NERC made a supplemental filing in 
response to a Commission staff data request.\11\ With regard to whether 
Requirement R8 obligates a joint response in a system emergency, NERC 
explained that Requirement R8 does not use the word ``joint'' or 
otherwise infer joint responsibility during system emergencies. Rather, 
NERC responded that the balancing authority and transmission operator 
have separate responsibilities to restore real and reactive power 
balance during system emergencies. NERC also stated that the use of 
``and'' between the two entities should not construe communication or 
coordination. NERC added that the Blackout Report \12\ correctly 
identifies communication and coordination issues as reliability issues 
and that communication and coordination are addressed in the 
Communications (COM) Reliability Standards.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Response of the North American Electric Reliability 
Corporation to Request for Additional Information Regarding 
Interpretation to Reliability Standard TOP-001-1, Requirement R8 
(NERC Response).
    \12\ Final Report on the August 14, 2003 Blackout in the United 
States and Canada (Blackout Report).
    \13\ NERC Response at 4-7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

    11. On April 21, 2011, the Commission issued a Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking (NOPR) proposing to approve NERC's interpretation of 
Reliability Standard TOP-001-1, Requirement R8.\14\ In the NOPR, the 
Commission stated that it believed that the ERO has presented a 
reasonable interpretation consistent with the language of the 
Reliability Standard. In addition, the NOPR noted that a balancing 
authority and transmission operator each have coordination and 
communication functions that are necessary for maintaining real and 
reactive power balance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ Electric Reliability Organization Interpretation of 
Transmission Operations Reliability Standard, Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking, 76 FR 23222 (Apr. 26, 2011), FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 
32,674 (2011) (NOPR).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    12. In response to the NOPR, NERC filed comments supporting the 
Commission's proposed approval of the interpretation. No comments were 
filed opposing the Commission's proposal to approve NERC's 
interpretation.

III. Commission Determination

    13. The Commission adopts the NOPR proposal and approves the 
interpretation of TOP-001-1, Requirement R8. The Commission finds that 
NERC's interpretation is just, reasonable, not unduly discriminatory or 
preferential, and in the public interest.
    14. The interpretation supports the stated purpose of the 
Reliability Standard, i.e., ensuring that reliability entities have 
clear decision-making authority and capabilities to take appropriate 
actions or direct the actions of others to return the transmission 
system to normal conditions during an emergency.\15\ The interpretation 
also clarifies the responsibilities of a balancing authority and 
transmission operator during a system emergency. Further, the language 
is consistent with the language of the requirement. Accordingly, the 
Commission approves the ERO's interpretation of TOP-001-1, Requirement 
R8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Id. at 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    15. We agree, as discussed in the interpretation, that the 
balancing authority is responsible for restoring real power balance 
during a system emergency and the transmission operator is responsible 
for restoring reactive power balance during a system emergency. 
However, during a system emergency, communication and coordination 
between the transmission operator and balancing authority can be 
essential to restore real and reactive power balance. For example, 
during an emergency, the balancing authority may rely on the real power 
output of a generator to fulfill its responsibility, while the 
transmission operator may expect the same generator unit to reduce real 
power to generate greater reactive power output.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ The Blackout Report described such a scenario, explaining 
that a generator unit tripped because the unit's protection system 
detected the VAR output, i.e., reactive power, exceeded the unit's 
capability. Blackout Report at 27. The Blackout Report also 
explained that no generator units were asked to reduce their real 
power output to produce more reactive power. Id. at 47.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    16. NERC acknowledges the need for such communication and 
coordination.\17\ NERC maintains that this coordination and 
communication is required through two currently-effective Communication 
Reliability Standards: (1) COM-001-1.1--Telecommunications and (2) COM-
002-2--Communication and Coordination.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ NERC Response at 6-7.
    \18\ NERC Response at 6-7. NERC also identifies several ongoing 
Reliability Standards projects that are intended to strengthen the 
requirements pertaining to communication and coordination between 
entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    17. We agree with NERC that the currently effective COM Reliability 
Standards provide for such communication and coordination. For example, 
Reliability Standard COM-002-2, Requirement R1 provides that 
transmission operators, balancing authorities and generator operators 
must have communication links with one another and must be staffed to 
address a real-time emergency. Reliability Standard EOP-001-0, 
Requirements R3, R4.3, and R7 also contain provisions relevant to the 
need for communication and coordination in emergencies.\19\ These 
provisions require balancing authorities and transmission operators to 
develop plans to mitigate operating emergencies including coordination 
among adjacent transmission operators and balancing authorities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See NOPR, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 32,674 at P 14. On July 13, 
2011, the Commission approved EOP-001-2 Reliability Standard, 
replacing EOP-001-0 effective July 1, 2013. Mandatory Reliability 
Standards for Interconnection Reliability Operating Limits; System 
Restoration Reliability Standards, 136 FERC ] 61,030 (2011). The 
applicable Requirements in EOP-001-2 relevant to the need for 
communication and coordination in emergencies are Requirements R2, 
R3.3, and R6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    18. Accordingly, for the reasons discussed above, we approve NERC's 
proposed interpretation of TOP-001-1, Requirement R8.

IV. Information Collection Statement

    19. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) regulations require 
that OMB approve certain reporting and recordkeeping requirements 
(collections of information) imposed by an agency.\20\ The information 
contained here is also

[[Page 58103]]

subject to review under section 3507(d) of the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 5 CFR 1320.11.
    \21\ 44 U.S.C. 3507(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    20. As stated above, the Commission approved, in Order No. 693, 
Reliability Standard TOP-001-1 that is the subject of the current 
rulemaking. This Final Rule approves the interpretation of the 
previously approved Reliability Standard, which was developed by NERC 
as the ERO. The interpretation, as clarified, relates to an existing 
Reliability Standard, and the Commission does not expect it to affect 
entities' current reporting burden.\22\ Accordingly, we will submit 
this Final Rule to OMB for informational purposes only.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See Order No. 693, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,242 at P 1901-
1907.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    21. Interested persons may obtain information on the reporting 
requirements by contacting the following: Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426 [Attention: 
Ellen Brown, Office of the Executive Director, e-mail: 
DataClearance@ferc.gov, Phone: (202) 502-8663, fax: (202) 273-0873].

V. Environmental Analysis

    22. The Commission is required to prepare an Environmental 
Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement for any action that may 
have a significant adverse effect on the human environment.\23\ The 
Commission has categorically excluded certain actions from this 
requirement as not having a significant effect on the human 
environment. Included in the exclusion are rules that are clarifying, 
corrective, or procedural or that do not substantially change the 
effect of the regulations being amended.\24\ The actions proposed 
herein fall within this categorical exclusion in the Commission's 
regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ Regulations Implementing the National Environmental Policy 
Act of 1969, Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897 (Dec. 17, 1987), FERC Stats. 
& Regs. Preambles 1986-1990 ] 30,783 (1987).
    \24\ 18 CFR 380.4(a)(2)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    23. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA) \25\ generally 
requires a description and analysis of final rules that will have 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
The RFA mandates consideration of regulatory alternatives that 
accomplish the stated objectives of a final rule and that minimize any 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
The Small Business Administration's (SBA) Office of Size Standards 
develops the numerical definition of a small business.\26\ The SBA has 
established a size standard for electric utilities, stating that a firm 
is small if, including its affiliates, it is primarily engaged in the 
transmission, generation and/or distribution of electric energy for 
sale and its total electric output for the preceding twelve months did 
not exceed four million megawatt hours.\27\ The RFA is not implicated 
by this Final Rule because the interpretations discussed herein will 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 5 U.S.C. 601-612.
    \26\ 13 CFR 121.101.
    \27\ 13 CFR 121.201, Section 22, Utilities, & n.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    24. The Commission approved Reliability Standard TOP-001-1 in 2007 
in Order No. 693. The Final Rule in the immediate docket addresses an 
interpretation of Requirement R8 of previously-approved TOP-001-1. The 
interpretation clarifies current compliance obligations of balancing 
authorities and transmission operators and therefore, does not create 
an additional regulatory impact on small entities.

VII. Document Availability

    25. In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the 
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an 
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the 
Internet through FERC's Home Page (https://www.ferc.gov) and in FERC's 
Public Reference Room during normal business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. 
eastern time) at 888 First Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426.
    26. From FERC's Home Page on the Internet, this information is 
available on eLibrary. The full text of this document is available on 
eLibrary in PDF and Microsoft Word format for viewing, printing, and/or 
downloading. To access this document in eLibrary, type the docket 
number excluding the last three digits of this document in the docket 
number field.
    27. User assistance is available for eLibrary and the FERC's 
website during normal business hours from FERC Online Support at 202-
502-6652 (toll free at 1-866-208-3676) or e-mail at 
ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov, or the Public Reference Room at (202) 502-
8371, TTY (202) 502-8659. E-mail the Public Reference Room at 
public.referenceroom@ferc.gov.

VIII. Effective Date and Congressional Notification

    28. These regulations are effective November 21, 2011. The 
Commission has determined, with the concurrence of the Administrator of 
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB, that this rule 
is not a ``major rule'' as defined in section 351 of the Small Business 
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996.

List of Subjects in 18 CFR Part 40

    Electric power, Electric utilities, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

    By the Commission.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-24088 Filed 9-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.