Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Ships Bunkers Easy Acquisition (SEA) Card® and Aircraft Ground Services (DFARS Case 2009-D019), 58149-58150 [2011-23944]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
(g) * * *
(5) If the Contractor fails to respond
to the Contracting Officer’s request for
information or additional information
under paragraph (g)(1) of this clause, the
Contracting Officer will issue a final
decision, in accordance with paragraph
(f) of this clause and the Disputes clause
of this contract, pertaining to the
validity of the asserted restriction.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 13. Amend 252.227–7037 by—
■ (a) Amending the introductory text by
removing ‘‘227.7102–3(c)’’ and adding
in its place ‘‘227.7102–4(c)’’;
■ (b) Amending the clause date by
removing ‘‘(SEP 1999)’’ and adding in
its place ‘‘(SEP 2011)’’; and
■ (c) Revising paragraphs (b), (c), (f), and
(l) to read as follows:
252.227–7037 Validation of restrictive
markings on technical data.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Presumption regarding
development exclusively at private
expense.
(1) Commercial items. For
commercially available off-the-shelf
items (defined at 41 U.S.C. 104) in all
cases, and for all other commercial
items except as provided in paragraph
(b)(2) of this clause, the Contracting
Officer will presume that a Contractor’s
asserted use or release restrictions are
justified on the basis that the item,
component, or process was developed
exclusively at private expense. The
Contracting Officer shall not challenge
such assertions unless the Contracting
Officer has information that
demonstrates that the item, component,
or process was not developed
exclusively at private expense.
(2) Major systems. The presumption of
development exclusively at private
expense does not apply to major
systems or subsystems or components
thereof, except for commercially
available off-the-shelf items (which are
governed by paragraph (b)(1) of this
clause). When the Contracting Officer
challenges an asserted restriction
regarding technical data for a major
system or a subsystem or component
thereof on the basis that the item,
component, or process was not
developed exclusively at private
expense, the Contracting Officer will
sustain the challenge unless information
provided by the Contractor or
subcontractor demonstrates that the
item, component, or process was
developed exclusively at private
expense.
(c) Justification. The Contractor or
subcontractor at any tier is responsible
for maintaining records sufficient to
justify the validity of its markings that
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:50 Sep 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
impose restrictions on the Government
and others to use, duplicate, or disclose
technical data delivered or required to
be delivered under the contract or
subcontract. Except as provided in
paragraph (b)(1) of this clause, the
Contractor or subcontractor shall be
prepared to furnish to the Contracting
Officer a written justification for such
restrictive markings in response to a
challenge under paragraph (e) of this
clause.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Final decision when Contractor or
subcontractor fails to respond. Upon a
failure of a Contractor or subcontractor
to submit any response to the challenge
notice the Contracting Officer will issue
a final decision to the Contractor or
subcontractor in accordance with
paragraph (b) of this clause and the
Disputes clause of this contract
pertaining to the validity of the asserted
restriction. This final decision shall be
issued as soon as possible after the
expiration of the time period of
paragraph (e)(1)(ii) or (e)(2) of this
clause. Following issuance of the final
decision, the Contracting Officer will
comply with the procedures in
paragraphs (g)(2)(ii) through (iv) of this
clause.
*
*
*
*
*
(l) Flowdown. The Contractor or
subcontractor agrees to insert this clause
in contractual instruments with its
subcontractors or suppliers at any tier
requiring the delivery of technical data.
*
*
*
*
*
14. Amend section 252.244–7000 by—
(a) Amending the clause date by
removing ‘‘(AUG 2011)’’ and adding in
its place ‘‘(SEP 2011)’’;
■ (b) Redesignating paragraphs (c)
through (h) as (e) through (j),
respectively; and
■ (c) Adding new paragraphs (c) and (d)
as follows:
■
■
252.244–7000 Subcontracts for
commercial items and commercial
components (DoD contracts).
*
*
*
*
*
(c) 252.227–7015, Technical Data—
Commercial Items (SEP 2011), if
applicable (see 227.7102–4(a)).
(d) 252.227–7037, Validation of
Restrictive Markings on Technical Data
(SEP 2011), if applicable (see 227.7102–
4(c)).
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2011–23956 Filed 9–19–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–08–P
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
58149
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Part 213
RIN 0750–AH07
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; Ships
Bunkers Easy Acquisition (SEA) Card®
and Aircraft Ground Services (DFARS
Case 2009–D019)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is issuing a final rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement to
allow the use of U.S. Government fuel
cards in lieu of a Purchase OrderInvoice-Voucher for fuel, oil, and
refueling-related items for purchases not
exceeding the simplified acquisition
threshold.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Effective Date: September 20,
2011.
Mr.
Dustin Pitsch, telephone 703–602–0289.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Background
DoD published a proposed rule in the
Federal register at 76 FR 21849 on April
19, 2011, to add language to Defense
Federal Acquisition Regulation
Supplement (DFARS) 213.306(a)(1)(A)
to include purchases of marine fuel, oil,
and refueling-related items up to the
simplified acquisition threshold using
the Ships Bunkers Easy Acquisition
(SEA) Card® in lieu of the SF 44,
Purchase Order-Invoice-Voucher.
Additionally, this section is revised to
include additional ground refuelingrelated services when using the AIR
Card®. These changes for use of the AIR
Card® and SEA Card® will improve the
refueling capability of aircraft and
smaller vessels at non-contract
locations. No public comments were
received in response to the proposed
rule.
II. Executive Order 12866 and
Executive Order 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM
20SER1
58150
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This is not
a significant regulatory action and,
therefore, was not subject to review
under Section 6(b) of Executive Order
12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
dated September 30, 1993. This rule is
not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
A final regulatory flexibility analysis
has been prepared consistent with the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601,
et seq., and is summarized as follows:
This is a final rule to revise the
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation
Supplement (DFARS) at 213 to permit
the use of U.S. Government fuel cards
in lieu of an SF 44, Purchase OrderInvoice-Voucher, for fuel, oil, and
refueling-related items for purchases not
exceeding the simplified acquisition
threshold. The objective of this rule is
to amend DFARS 213.306(a)(1)(A) to (1)
Permit the purchase of marine fuel
using the Ships’ bunkers Easy
Acquisition (SEA) Card® in lieu of the
SF44, Purchase Order-Invoice-Voucher,
up to the simplified acquisition
threshold and (2) provide additional
ground refueling-related services when
using the AIR Card®. The legal basis is
41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
Purchases of aviation fuel are on-thespot, over the counter transactions (‘‘gas
and go’’), but generally exceed the
micro-purchase threshold due to the
price of aviation fuel and oil fuel tank
capacities. Previously, the threshold for
SF44/AIR Card® purchases of fuel and
oil was set at the simplified acquisition
threshold at DFARS 213.306(a)(1)(A))
under DFARS Case 2007–D017 (see final
rule published at 72 FR 6484 on
February 12, 2007).
The military services and the U.S.
Coast Guard have small vessels that
fulfill valid mission needs in direct
support of national security. Unlike
larger vessels, small vessels’ movements
and needs are often unpredictable.
These small vessels must procure fuel
away from their home stations, but
because of their smaller size and unique
mission requirements are unable to use
the Defense Logistics Agency energy
bunkers contracts available at major
seaports. Due to port restrictions,
bunkering merchants do not typically
provide support to smaller vessels.
Instead, these smaller vessels frequent
non-contract merchants or ‘‘marina-type
merchants’’ that otherwise serve civilian
recreational watercraft and similar
needs.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:50 Sep 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
No public comments were received in
response to the initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
Approximately 80% of ‘‘marina-type
merchants’’ are considered small
businesses. Marina-type merchants
accepting the SEA Card® will pay a
normal fee to the banking institution or
processing center, similar to VISA
charges these merchants incur from
other credit card clients. In addition,
merchants are expected to benefit from
accelerated payments, since they will be
paid by the banking institution in
accordance with their merchant
agreement. The rule facilitates open
market purchases, benefits merchants by
making it much easier for merchants to
do business with the military and will
not have a significant cost or
administrative impact on contractors,
subcontractors, or offerors.
DoD does not expect this rule to have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
because the rule does not have a
significant effect beyond DoD’s internal
operating procedures, substituting the
use of a fuel card (AIR Card® and SEA
Card®) in lieu of the SF44, Purchase
Order-Invoice-Voucher.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 213
Government procurement.
Mary Overstreet,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
Therefore, 48 CFR part 213 is
amended as follows:
PART 213—SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
PROCEDURES
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
part 213 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
2. Section 213.306 is amended to
revise paragraph (a)(1)(A) to read as
follows:
■
213.306 SF 44, Purchase Order-InvoiceVoucher.
(a)(1) * * *
(A) Fuel and oil. U.S. Government
fuel cards may be used in lieu of an SF
44 for fuel, oil, and authorized
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
refueling-related items (see PGI 213.306
for procedures on use of fuel cards);
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2011–23944 Filed 9–19–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Part 215
RIN 0750–AG82
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulations Supplement; Discussions
Prior to Contract Award (DFARS Case
2010–D013)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is amending the Defense
Federal Acquisition Regulation
Supplement (DFARS) to strongly
encourage discussions prior to award for
source selections of procurements
estimated at $100 million or more.
DATES: Effective Date: September 20,
2011.
SUMMARY:
Mr.
Dustin Pitsch, telephone 703–602–0289.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Background
DoD published a proposed rule at 75
FR 71647 on November 24, 2010, to
implement the recommendation of the
DoD Source Selection Joint Analysis
Team (JAT) to strongly encourage the
use of discussions in all competitive
negotiated procurements over $100
million. The period for public comment
closed on January 24, 2011, and three
respondents provided comments.
The rule proposed to amend DFARS
part 215 to strongly recommend, for
acquisitions of more than $100 million,
that contracting officers hold
discussions rather than use the
authority at FAR 52.215–1 to award on
initial offers without discussions.
II. Discussion and Analysis
A. Proposed rule is excessive
Comment: One respondent said that
the proposed rule is ‘‘overkill.’’
Response: No change was made in the
final rule in response to this comment.
The JAT advises that data shows that
the number of protests filed against the
award of competitive negotiated
contracts and orders over $100 million
is substantially higher when discussions
are not held. A preference for holding
E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM
20SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 20, 2011)]
[Unknown Section]
[Pages 58149-58150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23944]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Part 213
RIN 0750-AH07
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Ships Bunkers
Easy Acquisition (SEA) Card[supreg] and Aircraft Ground Services (DFARS
Case 2009-D019)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is issuing a final rule amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement to allow the use of U.S. Government
fuel cards in lieu of a Purchase Order-Invoice-Voucher for fuel, oil,
and refueling-related items for purchases not exceeding the simplified
acquisition threshold.
DATES: Effective Date: September 20, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Dustin Pitsch, telephone 703-602-
0289.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD published a proposed rule in the Federal register at 76 FR
21849 on April 19, 2011, to add language to Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 213.306(a)(1)(A) to include purchases of
marine fuel, oil, and refueling-related items up to the simplified
acquisition threshold using the Ships Bunkers Easy Acquisition (SEA)
Card[reg] in lieu of the SF 44, Purchase Order-Invoice-Voucher.
Additionally, this section is revised to include additional ground
refueling-related services when using the AIR Card[supreg]. These
changes for use of the AIR Card[supreg] and SEA Card[supreg] will
improve the refueling capability of aircraft and smaller vessels at
non-contract locations. No public comments were received in response to
the proposed rule.
II. Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and
[[Page 58150]]
equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying
both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and
of promoting flexibility. This is not a significant regulatory action
and, therefore, was not subject to review under Section 6(b) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September
30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
A final regulatory flexibility analysis has been prepared
consistent with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
and is summarized as follows:
This is a final rule to revise the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) at 213 to permit the use of U.S.
Government fuel cards in lieu of an SF 44, Purchase Order-Invoice-
Voucher, for fuel, oil, and refueling-related items for purchases not
exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold. The objective of this
rule is to amend DFARS 213.306(a)(1)(A) to (1) Permit the purchase of
marine fuel using the Ships' bunkers Easy Acquisition (SEA)
Card[supreg] in lieu of the SF44, Purchase Order-Invoice-Voucher, up to
the simplified acquisition threshold and (2) provide additional ground
refueling-related services when using the AIR Card[supreg]. The legal
basis is 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
Purchases of aviation fuel are on-the-spot, over the counter
transactions (``gas and go''), but generally exceed the micro-purchase
threshold due to the price of aviation fuel and oil fuel tank
capacities. Previously, the threshold for SF44/AIR Card[supreg]
purchases of fuel and oil was set at the simplified acquisition
threshold at DFARS 213.306(a)(1)(A)) under DFARS Case 2007-D017 (see
final rule published at 72 FR 6484 on February 12, 2007).
The military services and the U.S. Coast Guard have small vessels
that fulfill valid mission needs in direct support of national
security. Unlike larger vessels, small vessels' movements and needs are
often unpredictable. These small vessels must procure fuel away from
their home stations, but because of their smaller size and unique
mission requirements are unable to use the Defense Logistics Agency
energy bunkers contracts available at major seaports. Due to port
restrictions, bunkering merchants do not typically provide support to
smaller vessels. Instead, these smaller vessels frequent non-contract
merchants or ``marina-type merchants'' that otherwise serve civilian
recreational watercraft and similar needs.
No public comments were received in response to the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis.
Approximately 80% of ``marina-type merchants'' are considered small
businesses. Marina-type merchants accepting the SEA Card[reg] will pay
a normal fee to the banking institution or processing center, similar
to VISA charges these merchants incur from other credit card clients.
In addition, merchants are expected to benefit from accelerated
payments, since they will be paid by the banking institution in
accordance with their merchant agreement. The rule facilitates open
market purchases, benefits merchants by making it much easier for
merchants to do business with the military and will not have a
significant cost or administrative impact on contractors,
subcontractors, or offerors.
DoD does not expect this rule to have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because the rule
does not have a significant effect beyond DoD's internal operating
procedures, substituting the use of a fuel card (AIR Card[supreg] and
SEA Card[supreg]) in lieu of the SF44, Purchase Order-Invoice-Voucher.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 213
Government procurement.
Mary Overstreet,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR part 213 is amended as follows:
PART 213--SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 213 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
0
2. Section 213.306 is amended to revise paragraph (a)(1)(A) to read as
follows:
213.306 SF 44, Purchase Order-Invoice-Voucher.
(a)(1) * * *
(A) Fuel and oil. U.S. Government fuel cards may be used in lieu of
an SF 44 for fuel, oil, and authorized refueling-related items (see PGI
213.306 for procedures on use of fuel cards);
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-23944 Filed 9-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-P