Airworthiness Directives; 328 Support Services GmbH (Type Certificate Previously Held by AvCraft Aerospace GmbH; Fairchild Dornier GmbH; Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH) Model 328-100 and -300 Airplanes, 58094-58098 [2011-22032]
Download as PDF
58094
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 762
Agriculture, Credit, Loan programs—
Agriculture.
For reasons discussed above, this rule
amends 7 CFR part 762 as follows:
PART 762—GUARANTEED FARM
LOANS
1. Revise the authority citation for part
762 to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 7 U.S.C. 1989.
2. Amend § 762.130 by revising
paragraphs (d)(4)(ii) and (d)(4)(iii)(C) to
read as follows:
■
§ 762.130 Loan approval and issuing the
guarantee.
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) The guarantee fee is established by
the Agency at the time the guarantee is
obligated. The current fee schedule is
available at https://www.fsa.usda.gov and
any FSA office. Guaranteed fees may be
adjusted annually based on factors that
affect program costs. The nonrefundable
fee is paid to the Agency by the lender.
The fee may be passed on to the
borrower and included in loan funds.
The guarantee fee for the loan type will
be calculated as follows:
(A) FO guarantee fee = Loan Amount
× % guaranteed × (FO percentage
established by FSA).
(B) OL guarantee fee = Loan Amount
× % guaranteed × (OL percentage
established by FSA).
(C) CL guarantee fee = Loan Amount
× % guaranteed × (CL percentage
established by FSA).
(iii) * * *
(C) Loans to beginning or socially
disadvantaged farmers involved in the
direct Downpayment Loan Program or
beginning farmers participating in a
qualified State Beginning Farmer
Program.
*
*
*
*
*
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
Signed on September 12, 2011.
Bruce Nelson,
Administrator, Farm Service Agency.
[FR Doc. 2011–23724 Filed 9–19–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–05–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:50 Sep 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Federal Aviation Administration
Discussion
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–1163; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–233–AD; Amendment
39–16795; AD 2011–18–13]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; 328 Support
Services GmbH (Type Certificate
Previously Held by AvCraft Aerospace
GmbH; Fairchild Dornier GmbH;
Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH) Model 328–
100 and –300 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are superseding an
existing airworthiness directive (AD)
that applies to the products listed above.
This AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify
and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes
the unsafe condition as:
SUMMARY:
During a routine inspection, cracks have
been found on an aeroplane at the lower
wing panel rear trailing edge inboard of flap
lever arm 1 (rib 5). A subsequent inspection
of the other aeroplanes in that operator’s fleet
revealed several more aeroplanes with cracks
at the same location. This condition, if not
corrected, could lead to structural failure of
the affected wing panel, possibly resulting in
the wing separating from the airplane with
consequent loss of control.
*
*
*
*
*
We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
October 25, 2011.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of October 25, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on December 2, 2010 (75 FR
75159), and proposed to supersede AD
2008–10–51, Amendment 39–15535 (73
FR 30752, May 29, 2008). That NPRM
proposed to correct an unsafe condition
for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
During a routine inspection, cracks have
been found on an aeroplane at the lower
wing panel rear trailing edge inboard of flap
lever arm 1 (rib 5). A subsequent inspection
of the other aeroplanes in that operator’s fleet
revealed several more aeroplanes with cracks
at the same location. This condition, if not
corrected, could lead to structural failure of
the affected wing panel, possibly resulting in
the wing separating from the airplane with
consequent loss of control.
To correct this unsafe condition, EASA
[European Aviation Safety Agency] issued
Emergency AD 2008–0087–E [dated May 8,
2008] to require detailed visual inspections
(DVI) of both the left (LH) and right (RH)
wing panel rear trailing edge around rib 3
and rib 5 and a subsequent Eddy Current
inspection (NDI) [non-destructive inspection]
of the same area to detect cracks, follow-up
repair actions when cracks are found, and the
reporting of all findings. The TC [type
certificate] holder has now developed a
modification, consisting of the cold
expansion of the former lower wing panel
CAMLOC holes together with the installation
of new attachment material that will prevent
the onset of cracks in the affected wing panel.
For the reasons described above, this
[EASA] AD retains the inspection and repair
requirements of AD 2008–0087–E, which is
superseded, adds repetitive inspections and
a requirement to modify both the LH and RH
wing panel rear trailing edges from rib 3 to
rib 9. Modification does not constitute
terminating action for the new repetitive
inspection requirements of this AD.
The new inspections are eddy current
inspections. The modification includes
cold expansion of the former lower wing
panel CAMLOC holes and installation of
new attachment material. You may
obtain further information by examining
the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
considered the comments received.
MCAI Reference Updates
EASA issued AD 2009–0194R1 on
March 10, 2011, which was corrected on
March 22, 2011. References have been
updated in Note 1 and paragraph (p) of
this AD to include this revision.
E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM
20SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Request to Remove Repetitive
Inspection Interval From Paragraph (h)
of This AD
Garner CAD Technic Design
Organization (GCT DO) Airworthiness
Office requested that the 400-flightcycle repetitive inspection interval be
removed from paragraph (h) of the
NPRM (75 FR 75159, December 2, 2010).
GCT DO Airworthiness Office stated
that, based on fatigue data, this
repetitive inspection is not required,
and is not specified in revised EASA AD
2009–0194R1, dated March 10, 2011,
and corrected on March 22, 2011.
We agree. Based on fatigue data, we
have determined that the 400-flightcycle repetitive inspection interval
should be removed from paragraph (h)
of this AD. The repetitive inspection
was removed from revised EASA AD
2009–0194R1, dated March 10, 2011,
and corrected on March 22, 2011.
Paragraph (h) of this AD has been
changed accordingly. References to the
400-flight-cycle repetitive inspections
also were removed from paragraphs (i)
and (j) of this AD.
To ensure that operators get credit for
the most recent inspection done in
accordance with Dornier Alert Service
Bulletin ASB–328J–57–015 or ASB–
328–57–037, both Revision 1, both
dated May 8, 2008; or 328 Support
Services Alert Service Bulletin ASB–
328J–57–015 or ASB–328–57–037, both
Revision 2, both dated May 20, 2008; we
have clarified paragraph (g) of this AD.
We have replaced the phrase, ‘‘in
accordance with the requirements of
paragraph (h) of this AD,’’ with the
phrase, ‘‘in accordance with Dornier
Alert Service Bulletin ASB–328J–57–
015 or ASB–328–57–037, both Revision
1, both dated May 8, 2008; or 328
Support Services Alert Service Bulletin
ASB–328J–57–015 or ASB–328–57–037,
both Revision 2, both dated May 20,
2008.’’
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Request for Extended Inspection
Interval in Paragraph (i) of This AD
GCT DO Airworthiness Office
requested that the initial compliance
time and repetitive inspection interval
defined in paragraph (i) of the NPRM
(75 FR 75159, December 2, 2010) be
extended from 800 flight cycles to 1,500
flight cycles. GCT DO Airworthiness
Office stated that this extension has
been allowed based on fatigue data, and
was specified in revised EASA AD
2009–0194R1, dated March 10, 2011,
and corrected on March 22, 2011.
We agree to extend the initial
compliance time and repetitive
inspection intervals for the reasons
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:50 Sep 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
given by the commenter. Paragraph (i) of
this AD has been changed accordingly.
Request To Extend Threshold for PostModification Inspections
GCT DO Airworthiness Office
requested that based on fatigue data, the
threshold for the post-modification
initial inspection be extended from 800
flight cycles to 25,000 flight cycles for
the Model 328–100 airplane, and from
800 flight cycles to 20,000 flight cycles
for Model 328–300 airplanes, and that
the repetitive inspections be extended
from 800 flight cycles to 1,500 flight
cycles.
We agree to extend the threshold for
post-modification initial inspections as
requested. Based on fatigue data, the
referenced EASA AD has included these
extensions; therefore, we have added
paragraph (k) to the AD to include the
new compliance times.
Additional Change to NPRM
The NPRM (75 FR 75159, December 2,
2010) would have allowed issuance of a
special flight permit if a crack was
found that ‘‘exceeds’’ 12.5 mm (0.49
inch). We have changed paragraph
(o)(4)(ii) of this AD to change the
wording from ‘‘exceeds’’ to ‘‘is less than
or equal to.’’
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data,
including the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
with the changes described previously.
We determined that these changes will
not increase the economic burden on
any operator or increase the scope of the
AD.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have required different
actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow our FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
about 49 products of U.S. registry.
The actions that are required by AD
2008–10–51 and retained in this AD
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
58095
take about 2 work-hours per product, at
an average labor rate of $85 per workhour. Required parts cost about $0 per
product. Based on these figures, the
estimated cost of the currently required
actions is $170 per product.
We estimate that it will take about 8
work-hours per product to comply with
the new basic requirements of this AD.
The average labor rate is $85 per workhour. Required parts will cost about
$11,600 per product. Where the service
information lists required parts costs
that are covered under warranty, we
have assumed that there will be no
charge for these parts. As we do not
control warranty coverage for affected
parties, some parties may incur costs
higher than estimated here. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD to the U.S. operators to be
$601,720, or $12,280 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM
20SER1
58096
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains the NPRM, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 57: Wings.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
During a routine inspection, cracks have
been found on an aeroplane at the lower
wing panel rear trailing edge inboard of flap
lever arm 1 (rib 5). A subsequent inspection
of the other aeroplanes in that operator’s fleet
revealed several more aeroplanes with cracks
at the same location. This condition, if not
corrected, could lead to structural failure of
the affected wing panel, possibly resulting in
the wing separating from the airplane with
consequent loss of control.
*
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
*
*
*
*
The new inspections are eddy current
inspections. The modification includes cold
expansion of the former lower wing panel
CAMLOC holes and installation of new
attachment material.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to 328 Support
Services GmbH (Type Certificate previously
held by AvCraft Aerospace GmbH; Fairchild
Dornier GmbH; Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH)
Model 328–100 and –300 airplanes; all serial
numbers; certificated in any category.
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Amendment 39–15535 (73 FR
30752, May 29, 2008) and adding the
following new AD:
2011–18–13 328 Support Services GmbH
(Type Certificate Previously Held by
AvCraft Aerospace GmbH; Fairchild
Dornier GmbH; Dornier Luftfahrt
GmbH): Amendment 39–16795. Docket
No. FAA–2010–1163; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–233–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective October 25, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2008–10–51,
Amendment 39–15535 (73 FR 30752, May 29,
2008).
Restatement of Requirements of AD 2008–
10–51 (73 FR 30752, May 29, 2008), With
Updated Service Information and Removal
of Certain Repetitive Inspections
Repetitive Detailed Visual Inspections for
Cracks
(g) Within 10 flight cycles, or 10 flight
hours, or 7 days, whichever occurs first after
June 3, 2008 (the effective date of AD 2008–
10–51 (73 FR 30752, May 29, 2008)):
Accomplish a detailed visual inspection of
both the left-hand (LH) and right-hand (RH)
lower wing panel inboard and outboard of
flap lever arm 1 (rib 5) for cracks, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Dornier Alert Service Bulletin
ASB–328J–57–015 or ASB–328–57–037, both
Revision 1, both dated May 8, 2008, as
applicable; or 328 Support Services Alert
Service Bulletin ASB–328J–57–015 or ASB–
328–57–037, both Revision 2, both dated May
20, 2008, as applicable. After the effective
date of this AD, use only 328 Support
Services Alert Service Bulletin ASB–328J–
57–015 or ASB–328–57–037, both Revision 2,
both dated May 20, 2008, as applicable. If no
crack is detected, repeat the detailed visual
inspection thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 50 flight hours. If any crack is
detected, before further flight, do an eddy
current inspection, in accordance with
Dornier Alert Service Bulletin ASB–328J–57–
015 or ASB–328–57–037, both Revision 1,
both dated May 8, 2008, as applicable; or 328
Support Services Alert Service Bulletin ASB–
328J–57–015 or ASB–328–57–037, both
Revision 2, both dated May 20, 2008, as
applicable.
Eddy Current Inspections for Cracks
(h) Except as required by paragraph (g) of
this AD, within 400 flight hours or 3 months
after June 3, 2008, whichever occurs first:
Accomplish an eddy current inspection for
cracking of both the LH and RH lower wing
panel in the vicinity of rib 3 and inboard and
outboard of flap lever arm 1 (rib 5), in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Dornier Alert Service Bulletin
ASB–328J–57–015 or ASB–328–57–037, both
Revision 1, both dated May 8, 2008, as
applicable; or 328 Support Services Alert
Service Bulletin ASB–328J–57–015 or ASB–
328–57–037, both Revision 2, both dated May
20, 2008, as applicable. After the effective
date of this AD, use only 328 Support
Services Alert Service Bulletin ASB–328J–
57–015 or ASB–328–57–037, both Revision 2,
both dated May 20, 2008, as applicable.
Accomplishment of the eddy current
inspection terminates the detailed visual
inspection required by paragraph (g) of this
AD.
New Requirements of This AD
New Repetitive Intervals for Eddy Current
Inspections
(i) Within 1,500 flight cycles after the most
recent eddy current inspection done in
accordance with the applicable service
bulletin listed in table 1 of this AD, or within
60 days after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later, do an eddy current
inspection for cracking of the lower wing
panel (outside) around the flap lever arm 1
(rib 5), in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of 328 Support
Services Alert Service Bulletin ASB–328–57–
037 (for Model 328–100 airplanes) or ASB–
328J–57–015 (for Model 328–300 airplanes),
both Revision 2, both dated May 20, 2008.
Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals
not to exceed 1,500 flight cycles, except as
provided by paragraph (k) of this AD.
TABLE 1—SERVICE BULLETINS
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Service Bulletin
Revision
Dornier Alert Service Bulletin ASB–328–57–037 ............................................................................................
Dornier Alert Service Bulletin ASB–328J–57–015 ..........................................................................................
328 Support Services Alert Service Bulletin ASB–328–57–037 .....................................................................
328 Support Services Alert Service Bulletin ASB–328J–57–015 ...................................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:50 Sep 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM
Date
1
1
2
2
20SER1
May
May
May
May
8, 2008.
8, 2008.
20, 2008.
20, 2008.
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Inspection and Modification of Lower Wing
Panel
(j) Within 24 months after the effective date
of this AD, do an eddy current inspection for
cracking of the lower wing panel (outside)
around the flap lever arm 1 (rib 5). If no
cracking is found, within 24 months after the
effective date of this AD, modify the lower
wing panel by doing a cold expansion of the
CAMLOC holes and installing new
attachment material from rib 9 LH to rib 9
RH. Do all actions required by this paragraph
in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of 328 Support Services Service
Bulletin SB–328–57–481 (for Model 328–100
airplanes) or SB–328J–57–230 (for Model
328–300 airplanes), both Revision 1, both
dated October 15, 2009.
(k) After the modification required by
paragraph (j) is done, do the eddy current
inspection required by paragraph (i) of this
AD at the applicable time specified in
paragraph (k)(1) or (k)(2) of this AD. Repeat
the inspections thereafter at the intervals
specified in paragraph (i) of this AD.
(1) For Model 328–100 airplanes: Within
25,000 flight cycles after accomplishing the
modification specified in paragraph (j) of this
AD.
(2) For Model 328–300 airplanes: Within
20,000 flight cycles after accomplishing the
modification specified in paragraph (j) of this
AD.
Repair
(l) If any cracking is found during any
inspection required by this AD, before further
flight contact 328 Support Services GmbH for
repair instructions and do the repair using a
method approved by either the Manager,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA; or European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (or its
delegated agent).
Inspections Accomplished According to
Previous Issues of Service Bulletins
(m) Inspections accomplished before the
effective date of this AD according to Dornier
Alert Service Bulletin ASB–328–57–037 or
Dornier Alert Service Bulletin ASB–328J–57–
015, both Revision 1, both dated May 8, 2008,
as applicable, are considered acceptable for
compliance with the inspection requirements
of paragraphs (i) and (j) of this AD.
Report
(n) At the applicable times specified in
paragraphs (n)(1) and (n)(2) of this AD: Send
328 Support Services GmbH a report of
findings (both positive and negative) found
during each inspection required by
paragraphs (g), (h), (i), and (j) of this AD. The
report must include the inspection results, a
description of any cracks found, the airplane
serial number, and the number of landings
and flight hours on the airplane. Send the
report to 328 Support Services GmbH, Global
Support Center, P.O. Box 1252, D–82231
Wessling, Federal Republic of Germany;
Telephone +49 8153 88111 6666; fax +49
8153 88111 6565; e-mail:
gsc.op@328support.de.
(1) For any inspection done on or after the
effective date of this AD: Within 30 days after
the inspection.
(2) For any inspection done before the
effective date of this AD: Within 30 days after
the effective date of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows:
EASA Airworthiness Directive 2009–
0194R1, dated March 10, 2011, corrected
March 22, 2011, gives credit for eddy current
inspections conducted in accordance with
the maintenance review board tasks. We are
not giving credit for those inspections.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(o) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356; telephone (425) 227–1137; fax (425)
227–1149. Information may be e-mailed to:
9–ANM–116–AMOC–REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
58097
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: A Federal
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, nor
shall a person be subject to a penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of
information subject to the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
collection of information displays a current
valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
Control Number for this information
collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to
be approximately 5 minutes per response,
including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing and reviewing the collection of
information. All responses to this collection
of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and
suggestions for reducing the burden should
be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence
Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
AES–200.
(4) Special Flight Permits: Special flight
permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and
21.199) to operate the airplane to a location
where the requirements of paragraphs (g), (h),
(i), (j), (k), and (l) of this AD can be done if
the following conditions are met:
(i) The initial inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD must be
accomplished.
(ii) If a crack indication is less than or
equal to 12.5 mm (0.49 inch), the Manager,
International Branch, ANM–116, concurs
with issuance of the special flight permits.
Related Information
(p) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2009–0194R1, dated March 10,
2011, corrected March 22, 2011, and the
service bulletins listed in table 2 of this AD,
for related information.
TABLE 2—RELATED SERVICE BULLETINS
Service Bulletin
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
328
328
328
328
Support
Support
Support
Support
Services
Services
Services
Services
Alert Service Bulletin ASB–328–57–037 .....................................................................
Alert Service Bulletin ASB–328J–57–015 ...................................................................
Service Bulletin SB–328–57–481 ................................................................................
GmbH Service Bulletin SB–328J–57–230 ..................................................................
Material Incorporated by Reference
(q) You must use the service information
contained in table 3 of this AD to do the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Revision
16:50 Sep 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
2
2
1
1
actions required by this AD, as applicable,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM
Date
20SER1
May 20, 2008.
May 20, 2008.
October 15, 2009.
October 15, 2009.
58098
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 3—ALL MATERIAL INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Service Bulletin
328
328
328
328
Support
Support
Support
Support
Services
Services
Services
Services
Alert Service Bulletin ASB–328–57–037 .....................................................................
Alert Service Bulletin ASB–328J–57–015 ...................................................................
Service Bulletin SB–328–57–481 ................................................................................
GmbH Service Bulletin SB–328J–57–230 ..................................................................
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact 328 Support Services GmbH,
Global Support Center, P.O. Box 1252, D–
82231 Wessling, Federal Republic of
Germany; telephone +49 8153 88111 6666;
fax +49 8153 88111 6565; e-mail
gsc.op@328support.de; Internet https://
www.328support.de.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August
19, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–22032 Filed 9–19–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0221; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–120–AD; Amendment
39–16805; AD 2011–18–23]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all The
Boeing Company Model DC–8–11, DC–
8–12, DC–8–21, DC–8–31, DC–8–32,
DC–8–33, DC–8–41, DC–8–42, and DC–
8–43 airplanes; Model DC–8–50 series
airplanes; Model DC–8F–54 and DC–
8F–55 airplanes; Model DC–8–60 series
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Revision
16:50 Sep 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
airplanes; Model DC–8–60F series
airplanes; Model DC–8–70 series
airplanes; and Model DC–8–70F series
airplanes. This AD requires repetitive
high frequency eddy current or
repetitive low frequency eddy current
inspections for cracks on the area
around certain fasteners of the access
opening doubler on the left and right
wing center spar lower cap, and repair,
if necessary. This AD was prompted by
reports that cracks in the center spar
lower cap and, in some cases, the web
of the spar, have been found at stations
Xrs = 168.00, Xrs = 251.00, and Xrs =
358.00. We are issuing this AD to detect
and correct cracks in the area around
certain fasteners of the access opening
doubler on the left and right wing center
spar lower cap, which could
compromise the structural integrity of
the wing structure.
DATES: This AD is effective October 25,
2011.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in the AD
as of October 25, 2011.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, 3855
Lakewood Boulevard, MC D800–0019,
Long Beach, California 90846–0001;
telephone 206–544–5000, extension 2;
fax 206–766–5683; e-mail
dse.boecom@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Date
2
2
1
1
May 20, 2008.
May 20, 2008.
October 15, 2009.
October 15, 2009.
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dara
Albouyeh, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120L, FAA, Los
Angeles Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
Lakewood, California 90712–4137;
phone: (562) 627–5222; fax: (562) 627–
5210; e-mail: dara.albouyeh@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that would apply to the
specified products. That NPRM
published in the Federal Register on
March 15, 2011 (76 FR 13926). That
NPRM proposed to require repetitive
high frequency eddy current or
repetitive low frequency eddy current
inspections for cracks on the area
around certain fasteners of the access
opening doubler on the left and right
wing center spar lower cap, and repair,
if necessary.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. The
following presents the comment
received on the proposal and the FAA’s
response to each comment.
Request To Revise Paragraph (h)(3) of
the NPRM
Boeing requested that we revise
paragraph (h)(3) of the NPRM (76 FR
13926, March 15, 2011) to refer to
‘‘Method 101 and 104,’’ instead of
‘‘Method 101 or 104.’’ Boeing explained
that Methods 101 and 104 should be
used when using Section 57–10–16 of
the McDonnell Douglas DC–8
Supplemental Inspection Document
(SID) Report L26–011, Volume II,
Revision 8, dated January 2005. Boeing
stated that ‘‘Method 101 and 104’’ is
correctly referenced in the service
information.
We agree. We have clarified the
reference as ‘‘Methods 101 and 104’’ in
paragraph (h)(3) of the final rule for the
reasons stated by Boeing.
E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM
20SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 20, 2011)]
[Unknown Section]
[Pages 58094-58098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-22032]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-1163; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-233-AD;
Amendment 39-16795; AD 2011-18-13]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; 328 Support Services GmbH (Type
Certificate Previously Held by AvCraft Aerospace GmbH; Fairchild
Dornier GmbH; Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH) Model 328-100 and -300 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD)
that applies to the products listed above. This AD results from
mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an
aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
During a routine inspection, cracks have been found on an
aeroplane at the lower wing panel rear trailing edge inboard of flap
lever arm 1 (rib 5). A subsequent inspection of the other aeroplanes
in that operator's fleet revealed several more aeroplanes with
cracks at the same location. This condition, if not corrected, could
lead to structural failure of the affected wing panel, possibly
resulting in the wing separating from the airplane with consequent
loss of control.
* * * * *
We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective October 25, 2011.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of October 25,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1137; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on December 2, 2010 (75
FR 75159), and proposed to supersede AD 2008-10-51, Amendment 39-15535
(73 FR 30752, May 29, 2008). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:
During a routine inspection, cracks have been found on an
aeroplane at the lower wing panel rear trailing edge inboard of flap
lever arm 1 (rib 5). A subsequent inspection of the other aeroplanes
in that operator's fleet revealed several more aeroplanes with
cracks at the same location. This condition, if not corrected, could
lead to structural failure of the affected wing panel, possibly
resulting in the wing separating from the airplane with consequent
loss of control.
To correct this unsafe condition, EASA [European Aviation Safety
Agency] issued Emergency AD 2008-0087-E [dated May 8, 2008] to
require detailed visual inspections (DVI) of both the left (LH) and
right (RH) wing panel rear trailing edge around rib 3 and rib 5 and
a subsequent Eddy Current inspection (NDI) [non-destructive
inspection] of the same area to detect cracks, follow-up repair
actions when cracks are found, and the reporting of all findings.
The TC [type certificate] holder has now developed a modification,
consisting of the cold expansion of the former lower wing panel
CAMLOC holes together with the installation of new attachment
material that will prevent the onset of cracks in the affected wing
panel.
For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD retains the
inspection and repair requirements of AD 2008-0087-E, which is
superseded, adds repetitive inspections and a requirement to modify
both the LH and RH wing panel rear trailing edges from rib 3 to rib
9. Modification does not constitute terminating action for the new
repetitive inspection requirements of this AD.
The new inspections are eddy current inspections. The modification
includes cold expansion of the former lower wing panel CAMLOC holes and
installation of new attachment material. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received.
MCAI Reference Updates
EASA issued AD 2009-0194R1 on March 10, 2011, which was corrected
on March 22, 2011. References have been updated in Note 1 and paragraph
(p) of this AD to include this revision.
[[Page 58095]]
Request to Remove Repetitive Inspection Interval From Paragraph (h) of
This AD
Garner CAD Technic Design Organization (GCT DO) Airworthiness
Office requested that the 400-flight-cycle repetitive inspection
interval be removed from paragraph (h) of the NPRM (75 FR 75159,
December 2, 2010). GCT DO Airworthiness Office stated that, based on
fatigue data, this repetitive inspection is not required, and is not
specified in revised EASA AD 2009-0194R1, dated March 10, 2011, and
corrected on March 22, 2011.
We agree. Based on fatigue data, we have determined that the 400-
flight-cycle repetitive inspection interval should be removed from
paragraph (h) of this AD. The repetitive inspection was removed from
revised EASA AD 2009-0194R1, dated March 10, 2011, and corrected on
March 22, 2011. Paragraph (h) of this AD has been changed accordingly.
References to the 400-flight-cycle repetitive inspections also were
removed from paragraphs (i) and (j) of this AD.
To ensure that operators get credit for the most recent inspection
done in accordance with Dornier Alert Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-015
or ASB-328-57-037, both Revision 1, both dated May 8, 2008; or 328
Support Services Alert Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-015 or ASB-328-57-
037, both Revision 2, both dated May 20, 2008; we have clarified
paragraph (g) of this AD. We have replaced the phrase, ``in accordance
with the requirements of paragraph (h) of this AD,'' with the phrase,
``in accordance with Dornier Alert Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-015 or
ASB-328-57-037, both Revision 1, both dated May 8, 2008; or 328 Support
Services Alert Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-015 or ASB-328-57-037, both
Revision 2, both dated May 20, 2008.''
Request for Extended Inspection Interval in Paragraph (i) of This AD
GCT DO Airworthiness Office requested that the initial compliance
time and repetitive inspection interval defined in paragraph (i) of the
NPRM (75 FR 75159, December 2, 2010) be extended from 800 flight cycles
to 1,500 flight cycles. GCT DO Airworthiness Office stated that this
extension has been allowed based on fatigue data, and was specified in
revised EASA AD 2009-0194R1, dated March 10, 2011, and corrected on
March 22, 2011.
We agree to extend the initial compliance time and repetitive
inspection intervals for the reasons given by the commenter. Paragraph
(i) of this AD has been changed accordingly.
Request To Extend Threshold for Post-Modification Inspections
GCT DO Airworthiness Office requested that based on fatigue data,
the threshold for the post-modification initial inspection be extended
from 800 flight cycles to 25,000 flight cycles for the Model 328-100
airplane, and from 800 flight cycles to 20,000 flight cycles for Model
328-300 airplanes, and that the repetitive inspections be extended from
800 flight cycles to 1,500 flight cycles.
We agree to extend the threshold for post-modification initial
inspections as requested. Based on fatigue data, the referenced EASA AD
has included these extensions; therefore, we have added paragraph (k)
to the AD to include the new compliance times.
Additional Change to NPRM
The NPRM (75 FR 75159, December 2, 2010) would have allowed
issuance of a special flight permit if a crack was found that
``exceeds'' 12.5 mm (0.49 inch). We have changed paragraph (o)(4)(ii)
of this AD to change the wording from ``exceeds'' to ``is less than or
equal to.''
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously. We determined that these
changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect about 49 products of U.S.
registry.
The actions that are required by AD 2008-10-51 and retained in this
AD take about 2 work-hours per product, at an average labor rate of $85
per work-hour. Required parts cost about $0 per product. Based on these
figures, the estimated cost of the currently required actions is $170
per product.
We estimate that it will take about 8 work-hours per product to
comply with the new basic requirements of this AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $11,600 per
product. Where the service information lists required parts costs that
are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no
charge for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for
affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated
here. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the
U.S. operators to be $601,720, or $12,280 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities
[[Page 58096]]
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Amendment 39-15535 (73 FR
30752, May 29, 2008) and adding the following new AD:
2011-18-13 328 Support Services GmbH (Type Certificate
Previously Held by AvCraft Aerospace GmbH; Fairchild Dornier GmbH;
Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH): Amendment 39-16795. Docket No. FAA-2010-
1163; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-233-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective October
25, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2008-10-51, Amendment 39-15535 (73 FR
30752, May 29, 2008).
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to 328 Support Services GmbH (Type
Certificate previously held by AvCraft Aerospace GmbH; Fairchild
Dornier GmbH; Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH) Model 328-100 and -300
airplanes; all serial numbers; certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57: Wings.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
During a routine inspection, cracks have been found on an
aeroplane at the lower wing panel rear trailing edge inboard of flap
lever arm 1 (rib 5). A subsequent inspection of the other aeroplanes
in that operator's fleet revealed several more aeroplanes with
cracks at the same location. This condition, if not corrected, could
lead to structural failure of the affected wing panel, possibly
resulting in the wing separating from the airplane with consequent
loss of control.
* * * * *
The new inspections are eddy current inspections. The
modification includes cold expansion of the former lower wing panel
CAMLOC holes and installation of new attachment material.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Restatement of Requirements of AD 2008-10-51 (73 FR 30752, May 29,
2008), With Updated Service Information and Removal of Certain
Repetitive Inspections
Repetitive Detailed Visual Inspections for Cracks
(g) Within 10 flight cycles, or 10 flight hours, or 7 days,
whichever occurs first after June 3, 2008 (the effective date of AD
2008-10-51 (73 FR 30752, May 29, 2008)): Accomplish a detailed
visual inspection of both the left-hand (LH) and right-hand (RH)
lower wing panel inboard and outboard of flap lever arm 1 (rib 5)
for cracks, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Dornier Alert Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-015 or ASB-328-57-037,
both Revision 1, both dated May 8, 2008, as applicable; or 328
Support Services Alert Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-015 or ASB-328-
57-037, both Revision 2, both dated May 20, 2008, as applicable.
After the effective date of this AD, use only 328 Support Services
Alert Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-015 or ASB-328-57-037, both
Revision 2, both dated May 20, 2008, as applicable. If no crack is
detected, repeat the detailed visual inspection thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 50 flight hours. If any crack is detected,
before further flight, do an eddy current inspection, in accordance
with Dornier Alert Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-015 or ASB-328-57-
037, both Revision 1, both dated May 8, 2008, as applicable; or 328
Support Services Alert Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-015 or ASB-328-
57-037, both Revision 2, both dated May 20, 2008, as applicable.
Eddy Current Inspections for Cracks
(h) Except as required by paragraph (g) of this AD, within 400
flight hours or 3 months after June 3, 2008, whichever occurs first:
Accomplish an eddy current inspection for cracking of both the LH
and RH lower wing panel in the vicinity of rib 3 and inboard and
outboard of flap lever arm 1 (rib 5), in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Dornier Alert Service Bulletin ASB-
328J-57-015 or ASB-328-57-037, both Revision 1, both dated May 8,
2008, as applicable; or 328 Support Services Alert Service Bulletin
ASB-328J-57-015 or ASB-328-57-037, both Revision 2, both dated May
20, 2008, as applicable. After the effective date of this AD, use
only 328 Support Services Alert Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-015 or
ASB-328-57-037, both Revision 2, both dated May 20, 2008, as
applicable. Accomplishment of the eddy current inspection terminates
the detailed visual inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
New Requirements of This AD
New Repetitive Intervals for Eddy Current Inspections
(i) Within 1,500 flight cycles after the most recent eddy
current inspection done in accordance with the applicable service
bulletin listed in table 1 of this AD, or within 60 days after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, do an eddy
current inspection for cracking of the lower wing panel (outside)
around the flap lever arm 1 (rib 5), in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of 328 Support Services Alert Service
Bulletin ASB-328-57-037 (for Model 328-100 airplanes) or ASB-328J-
57-015 (for Model 328-300 airplanes), both Revision 2, both dated
May 20, 2008. Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 1,500 flight cycles, except as provided by paragraph (k) of
this AD.
Table 1--Service Bulletins
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Bulletin Revision Date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dornier Alert Service 1 May 8, 2008.
Bulletin ASB-328-57-037.
Dornier Alert Service 1 May 8, 2008.
Bulletin ASB-328J-57-015.
328 Support Services Alert 2 May 20, 2008.
Service Bulletin ASB-328-57-
037.
328 Support Services Alert 2 May 20, 2008.
Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-
015.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 58097]]
Inspection and Modification of Lower Wing Panel
(j) Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, do an
eddy current inspection for cracking of the lower wing panel
(outside) around the flap lever arm 1 (rib 5). If no cracking is
found, within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, modify
the lower wing panel by doing a cold expansion of the CAMLOC holes
and installing new attachment material from rib 9 LH to rib 9 RH. Do
all actions required by this paragraph in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of 328 Support Services Service Bulletin
SB-328-57-481 (for Model 328-100 airplanes) or SB-328J-57-230 (for
Model 328-300 airplanes), both Revision 1, both dated October 15,
2009.
(k) After the modification required by paragraph (j) is done, do
the eddy current inspection required by paragraph (i) of this AD at
the applicable time specified in paragraph (k)(1) or (k)(2) of this
AD. Repeat the inspections thereafter at the intervals specified in
paragraph (i) of this AD.
(1) For Model 328-100 airplanes: Within 25,000 flight cycles
after accomplishing the modification specified in paragraph (j) of
this AD.
(2) For Model 328-300 airplanes: Within 20,000 flight cycles
after accomplishing the modification specified in paragraph (j) of
this AD.
Repair
(l) If any cracking is found during any inspection required by
this AD, before further flight contact 328 Support Services GmbH for
repair instructions and do the repair using a method approved by
either the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA; or European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
(or its delegated agent).
Inspections Accomplished According to Previous Issues of Service
Bulletins
(m) Inspections accomplished before the effective date of this
AD according to Dornier Alert Service Bulletin ASB-328-57-037 or
Dornier Alert Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-015, both Revision 1,
both dated May 8, 2008, as applicable, are considered acceptable for
compliance with the inspection requirements of paragraphs (i) and
(j) of this AD.
Report
(n) At the applicable times specified in paragraphs (n)(1) and
(n)(2) of this AD: Send 328 Support Services GmbH a report of
findings (both positive and negative) found during each inspection
required by paragraphs (g), (h), (i), and (j) of this AD. The report
must include the inspection results, a description of any cracks
found, the airplane serial number, and the number of landings and
flight hours on the airplane. Send the report to 328 Support
Services GmbH, Global Support Center, P.O. Box 1252, D-82231
Wessling, Federal Republic of Germany; Telephone +49 8153 88111
6666; fax +49 8153 88111 6565; e-mail: gsc.op@328support.de.
(1) For any inspection done on or after the effective date of
this AD: Within 30 days after the inspection.
(2) For any inspection done before the effective date of this
AD: Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows:
EASA Airworthiness Directive 2009-0194R1, dated March 10, 2011,
corrected March 22, 2011, gives credit for eddy current inspections
conducted in accordance with the maintenance review board tasks. We
are not giving credit for those inspections.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(o) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the International
Branch, send it to ATTN: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 227-1137; fax (425) 227-1149. Information may be e-mailed to:
9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district
office/certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: A Federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a
person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information
displays a current valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number
for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 5
minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing and reviewing the collection of information. All
responses to this collection of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing
the burden should be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave.,
SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: Information Collection Clearance
Officer, AES-200.
(4) Special Flight Permits: Special flight permits may be issued
in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the
airplane to a location where the requirements of paragraphs (g),
(h), (i), (j), (k), and (l) of this AD can be done if the following
conditions are met:
(i) The initial inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD
must be accomplished.
(ii) If a crack indication is less than or equal to 12.5 mm
(0.49 inch), the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, concurs
with issuance of the special flight permits.
Related Information
(p) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2009-0194R1,
dated March 10, 2011, corrected March 22, 2011, and the service
bulletins listed in table 2 of this AD, for related information.
Table 2--Related Service Bulletins
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Bulletin Revision Date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
328 Support Services Alert 2 May 20, 2008.
Service Bulletin ASB-328-57-
037.
328 Support Services Alert 2 May 20, 2008.
Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-
015.
328 Support Services Service 1 October 15, 2009.
Bulletin SB-328-57-481.
328 Support Services GmbH 1 October 15, 2009.
Service Bulletin SB-328J-57-
230.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Material Incorporated by Reference
(q) You must use the service information contained in table 3 of
this AD to do the actions required by this AD, as applicable, unless
the AD specifies otherwise.
[[Page 58098]]
Table 3--All Material Incorporated by Reference
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Bulletin Revision Date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
328 Support Services Alert 2 May 20, 2008.
Service Bulletin ASB-328-57-
037.
328 Support Services Alert 2 May 20, 2008.
Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-
015.
328 Support Services Service 1 October 15, 2009.
Bulletin SB-328-57-481.
328 Support Services GmbH 1 October 15, 2009.
Service Bulletin SB-328J-57-
230.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact 328
Support Services GmbH, Global Support Center, P.O. Box 1252, D-82231
Wessling, Federal Republic of Germany; telephone +49 8153 88111
6666; fax +49 8153 88111 6565; e-mail gsc.op@328support.de; Internet
https://www.328support.de.
(3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 19, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-22032 Filed 9-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P