Regulated Navigation Area; Route 24 Bridge Construction, Tiverton and Portsmouth, RI, 57910-57913 [2011-23916]
Download as PDF
57910
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 181 / Monday, September 19, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
NOTICE OF DIRECT DEBIT
(RECLAMATION). The Federal Reserve
Bank will provide advice of the debit to
the reclamation debtor. If the
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank is
unable to debit a reclamation debtor’s
Master Account, Treasury will proceed
to collect the reclamation debt through
offset in accordance with § 240.10 and
§ 240.11.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: September 12, 2011.
Richard L. Gregg,
Fiscal Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–23896 Filed 9–16–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–35–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0868]
RIN 1625–AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; Route 24
Bridge Construction, Tiverton and
Portsmouth, RI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary interim rule with
request for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a regulated navigation area
(RNA) on the navigable waters of the
Sakonnet River under and surrounding
construction of the new Route 24 bridge
that crosses the Sakonnet River between
Tiverton and Portsmouth, Rhode Island.
This rule implements certain safety
measures including establishment of a
temporary channel beneath the bridge,
speed restrictions, and suspension of all
vessel traffic within the RNA during
construction operations that could pose
an imminent hazard to vessels operating
in the area. This rule is necessary to
provide for the safety of life on the
navigable waters during construction of
the Route 24 bridge over the main
channel of the Sakonnet River.
DATES: This rule is effective on
September 19, 2011 until 11:59 p.m. on
May 1, 2013. This rule is effective with
actual notice for purposes of
enforcement from 8 a.m. on September
9, 2011, until 11:59 p.m. on May 1,
2013. Public comments may be
submitted throughout the effective
period.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2011–0868 using any one of the
following methods:
tkelley on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:21 Sep 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
• Hand Delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
Documents indicated in this preamble
as being available in the docket are part
of docket USCG–2011–0868 and are
available online by going to https://
www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG–
2011–0868 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box, and
then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They are also
available for inspection or copying at
the Docket Management Facility (M–30),
U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail Mr. Edward G.
LeBlanc, Chief of the Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Southeastern New England;
telephone 401–435–2351, e-mail
Edward.G.LeBlanc@uscg.mil, or
Lieutenant Junior Grade Isaac Slavitt,
Coast Guard First District Waterways
Management Branch, telephone 617–
223–8385, e-mail
Isaac.M.Slavitt@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
As this temporary interim rule will be
in effect before the end of the comment
period, the Coast Guard will evaluate
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and revise this rule as necessary to
address significant public comments.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2011–0868),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an e-mail
address, or a telephone number in the
body of your document so that we can
contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2011–0868’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit comments by mail or hand
delivery, submit them in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic
filing. If you submit comments by mail
and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period and may change
this rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2011–
0868’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
E:\FR\FM\19SER1.SGM
19SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 181 / Monday, September 19, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
tkelley on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting in connection with the public
comment period for this interim rule.
But you may submit a request for one
using one of the four methods specified
under ADDRESSES. Please explain why
you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold
one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
Although they were not held
specifically to solicit public comments
on this interim rule and were not
announced in the Federal Register, the
Coast Guard has held or participated in
several locally announced informal
waterway user meetings, including a
Rhode Island Port Safety Forum on
August 11, 2011, attended by
approximately 70 people, an on-site
meeting with local elected and
appointed officials on August 17, 2011,
and a locally advertised, informal
meeting on August 24, 2011, attended
by approximately 45 people.
Potential waterway closures,
temporary channels, and navigation
safety measures were discussed at these
meetings. The temporary channel and
navigation safety measures discussed at
these meetings were generally well
received by those in attendance.
Stakeholder comments and concerns
were identified and many have been
incorporated into this regulation. To
view the stakeholder comments see the
meeting minutes in the docket.
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
interim rule without prior Federal
Register notice pursuant to authority
under section 4(a) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)).
This provision authorizes an agency to
issue a rule without prior notice when
the agency for good cause finds that
those procedures are ‘‘impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:21 Sep 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this
rule. The need for waterway closures
was not brought to the attention of the
Coast Guard until July 14, 2011, when
the Rhode Island Department of
Transportation (RI DOT) requested a
complete waterway closure for a 30-day
period beginning August 14, 2011.
The Coast Guard discussed with RI
DOT a number of alternatives to
complete waterway closure, including
delaying this portion of construction
until after the traditional boating season,
which ends around November 1 each
year, or arranging the construction
barges and cranes in a manner that
leaves a portion of the main channel
navigable, or scheduling work so that
the main channel is clear for at least a
block of hours each day. A delay until
November 1 would risk construction
complications from colder late autumn
weather, and because construction
barges and cranes are already in place,
any delay would necessarily prolong the
construction operation and increase its
cost to the public. For engineering
reasons, to allow the lifting of huge steel
girders that will span the main channel,
construction equipment must be placed
across the entire channel. For each day
that construction was delayed due to the
inability to place equipment in the main
channel, RI DOT estimated it would cost
Rhode Island taxpayers $100,000. The
Coast Guard and RI DOT, after
consulting with local elected and
appointed officials and harbormasters,
concluded that allowing the
construction equipment to obstruct the
main channel, coupled with a
temporary channel around the
construction to be established by the
Coast Guard, was the preferred
alternative.
We were concerned that the waterway
obstruction proposed by RI DOT might
have a significant impact on waterway
users, so it was necessary to move
quickly to protect the safety of workers
and the public, and facilitate
construction during optimal weather
conditions that were deemed by RI DOT
as an engineering necessity. Because of
the cost to the public of any
construction delay, and because the
imminence of the planned construction
work left insufficient time for
compliance with APA notice and
comment procedures, it would have
been contrary to the public interest and
impracticable to follow those
procedures before issuing this rule.
Moreover, to the extent we had met with
many of the persons most likely to be
affected by the rule and we addressed
many of their concerns in drafting this
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57911
rule, following APA notice and
comment procedures before issuing this
rule was unnecessary. In order to
address any further public concerns,
this rule is available for subsequent
public comment as long as it is in force,
and if comments indicate a need to
amend the rule, we will consider doing
so.
For the same reasons, we also find
that good cause exists, under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3), for making this rule effective
less than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register.
Basis and Purpose
Under the Ports and Waterways Safety
Act, the Coast Guard has the authority
to establish RNAs in defined water areas
that are determined to have hazardous
conditions and in which vessel traffic
can be regulated in the interest of safety.
See 33 U.S.C. 1231 and Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
The purpose of this rule is to ensure
the safety of waterway users, the public,
and construction workers for the
duration of the new Route 24 bridge
construction over the main channel of
the Sakonnet River during construction
operations.
Discussion of Rule
This action is intended to control
vessel traffic for the duration of the new
Route 24 bridge construction over the
main channel of the Sakonnet River.
Construction is now underway and may
last until May 1, 2013. The Coast Guard
may close the regulated area described
in this rule to all vessel traffic during
any circumstance that poses an
imminent threat to waterway users
operating in the area. Complete
waterway closures will be made with as
much advance notice as possible.
During the period where the main
channel of the Sakonnet River is
obstructed and a temporary channel is
established, both the aids to navigation
marking the temporary channel and
navigation safety measures will be
published with the widest distribution
among the affected segments of the
public. Such means of notification will
include, but is not limited to, Broadcast
Notice to Mariners, Local Notice to
Mariners, and Marine Safety
Information Bulletins distributed by email to the local maritime community,
including every person who attended
the meetings noted above and who
provided an e-mail address upon
registering.
Entry into this RNA during a closure
is prohibited unless authorized by the
Sector Southeastern New England
Captain of the Port (COTP). Any
E:\FR\FM\19SER1.SGM
19SER1
57912
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 181 / Monday, September 19, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
violation of this RNA is punishable by
civil and criminal penalties, in rem
liability against the offending vessel,
and the initiation of suspension or
revocation proceedings against Coast
Guard-issued merchant-mariner
credentials.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
tkelley on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Executive Order 12866 and Executive
Order 13563
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
local marinas and businesses (such as
waterside restaurants), or vessels who
intend to transit in the Sakonnet River
beneath the new Route 24 bridge
between September 9, 2011 and May 1,
2013.
This regulation may have some
impact on small entities, but the
potential impact will be minimized for
the following reasons: Any temporary
channel or other safety measures will
allow most mariners to continue to
transit the Sakonnet River beneath the
new Route 24 bridge. Additionally,
vessels can bypass the Sakonnet River
by using an alternate route up through
the East Passage of Narragansett Bay to
reach a destination above the Route 24
Bridge. We expect that any complete
closure of the RNA will be brief. We
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:21 Sep 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
will use various appropriate means to
inform the public before, during, and at
the conclusion of any RNA enforcement
period.
will not result in such expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process. If
this rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call LT Judson
Coleman, Prevention Department,
Sector Long Island Sound, at 203–468–
4596.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or Tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Taking of Private Property
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have Tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
Tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
E:\FR\FM\19SER1.SGM
19SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 181 / Monday, September 19, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves the establishing of a regulated
navigation area and therefore falls
within the categorical exclusion noted
above. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. Any comments received
concerning environmental impacts will
be considered and changes made to the
environmental analysis checklist and
categorical exclusion determination as
appropriate.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for Part 165
continues to read as follows:
tkelley on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with RULES
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T01–0868 to read as
follows:
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:21 Sep 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
57913
§ 165.T01–0868 Regulated Navigation
Area; Route 24 Bridge Construction,
Sakonnet River, Rhode Island.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
(a) Location. The following area is a
regulated navigation area: All navigable
waters of the Sakonnet River between
Tiverton and Portsmouth, RI, from
surface to bottom, within 100 yards of
the Route 24 bridge over the Sakonnet
River.
(b) Regulations. The general
regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.10,
165.11, and 165.13 apply within the
RNA, and in addition:
(1) Each person or vessel within the
RNA must comply with the directions of
the Captain of the Port Sector
Southeastern New England (COTP) or
the COTP’s designated on-scene patrol
personnel and must comply with all
applicable regulations including but not
limited to the Rules of the Road (33 CFR
Subchapter E, Inland Navigational
Rules);
(2) The COTP may close the RNA or
establish a marked temporary channel
within the RNA at any time to protect
public safety;
(3) Each vessel using the temporary
channel must not exceed 47 feet in
height from the waterline, have a draft
not exceeding 17 feet, and enter the
temporary channel only if it is
completely clear of all other vessel
traffic; and
(4) Each vessel approaching the
temporary channel and equipped with a
VHF radio must make an appropriate
‘‘Securite’’ radio call to notify
approaching vessel traffic;
(c) Effective period; enforcement. This
section is effective from 8 a.m. on
September 9, 2011, until 11:59 p.m. on
May 1, 2013. Paragraph (b) of this
section may be enforced at any time
within that period. The COTP and
designated on-scene patrol personnel
will notify the public whenever
paragraph (b) is in force and whenever
enforcement is lifted. Notification may
be by Broadcast Notice to Mariners,
Local Notice to Mariners, Marine Safety
Information Bulletins, or by siren, radio,
flashing light, or other hailing by a Coast
Guard vessel.
(d) Violations. Report violations of
this regulated navigation area to the
COTP at 508–457–3211 or on VHF–
Channel 16.
40 CFR Part 63
Dated: September 7, 2011.
D.A. Neptun,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2011–23916 Filed 9–16–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2005–0084; FRL–9466–1]
RIN 2060–AQ74
Amendments to National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for Area Sources: Plating and
Polishing
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; withdrawal of direct
final rule.
AGENCY:
On June 12, 2008, the EPA
issued national emission standards for
hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for
the plating and polishing area source
category under section 112 of the Clean
Air Act (CAA). On June 20, 2011, the
EPA proposed amendments to clarify
that the emission control requirements
of the plating and polishing area source
NESHAP did not apply to any benchscale activities. The amendments also
made several technical corrections and
clarifications that are not significant
changes in the rule’s requirements. In
addition, on June 20, 2011, the EPA
issued a direct final rule amending the
area source standards for plating and
polishing area sources. Since we
received an adverse comment, we are
withdrawing the direct final rule today
simultaneously with this final rule.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
October 19, 2011. Effective September
19, 2011, EPA withdraws the direct final
rule published at 76 FR 35750 on June
20, 2011.
ADDRESSES:
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., confidential
business information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the EPA Docket Center, Public Reading
Room, EPA West Building, Room 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. The Public Reading
Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST),
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\19SER1.SGM
19SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 181 (Monday, September 19, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57910-57913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23916]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2011-0868]
RIN 1625-AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; Route 24 Bridge Construction, Tiverton
and Portsmouth, RI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary interim rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a regulated navigation area
(RNA) on the navigable waters of the Sakonnet River under and
surrounding construction of the new Route 24 bridge that crosses the
Sakonnet River between Tiverton and Portsmouth, Rhode Island. This rule
implements certain safety measures including establishment of a
temporary channel beneath the bridge, speed restrictions, and
suspension of all vessel traffic within the RNA during construction
operations that could pose an imminent hazard to vessels operating in
the area. This rule is necessary to provide for the safety of life on
the navigable waters during construction of the Route 24 bridge over
the main channel of the Sakonnet River.
DATES: This rule is effective on September 19, 2011 until 11:59 p.m. on
May 1, 2013. This rule is effective with actual notice for purposes of
enforcement from 8 a.m. on September 9, 2011, until 11:59 p.m. on May
1, 2013. Public comments may be submitted throughout the effective
period.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2011-0868 using any one of the following methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department
of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The
telephone number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG-2011-0868 and are available online by
going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-0868 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail Mr. Edward G. LeBlanc, Chief of the
Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Southeastern New
England; telephone 401-435-2351, e-mail Edward.G.LeBlanc@uscg.mil, or
Lieutenant Junior Grade Isaac Slavitt, Coast Guard First District
Waterways Management Branch, telephone 617-223-8385, e-mail
Isaac.M.Slavitt@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
As this temporary interim rule will be in effect before the end of
the comment period, the Coast Guard will evaluate and revise this rule
as necessary to address significant public comments.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2011-0868), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment.
If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered
as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2011-0868'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in
an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change this rule
based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2011-0868'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m.,
[[Page 57911]]
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an agreement
with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket Management
Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting in connection with the
public comment period for this interim rule. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
Although they were not held specifically to solicit public comments
on this interim rule and were not announced in the Federal Register,
the Coast Guard has held or participated in several locally announced
informal waterway user meetings, including a Rhode Island Port Safety
Forum on August 11, 2011, attended by approximately 70 people, an on-
site meeting with local elected and appointed officials on August 17,
2011, and a locally advertised, informal meeting on August 24, 2011,
attended by approximately 45 people.
Potential waterway closures, temporary channels, and navigation
safety measures were discussed at these meetings. The temporary channel
and navigation safety measures discussed at these meetings were
generally well received by those in attendance. Stakeholder comments
and concerns were identified and many have been incorporated into this
regulation. To view the stakeholder comments see the meeting minutes in
the docket.
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this interim rule without prior Federal
Register notice pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice when the
agency for good cause finds that those procedures are ``impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not
publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this
rule. The need for waterway closures was not brought to the attention
of the Coast Guard until July 14, 2011, when the Rhode Island
Department of Transportation (RI DOT) requested a complete waterway
closure for a 30-day period beginning August 14, 2011.
The Coast Guard discussed with RI DOT a number of alternatives to
complete waterway closure, including delaying this portion of
construction until after the traditional boating season, which ends
around November 1 each year, or arranging the construction barges and
cranes in a manner that leaves a portion of the main channel navigable,
or scheduling work so that the main channel is clear for at least a
block of hours each day. A delay until November 1 would risk
construction complications from colder late autumn weather, and because
construction barges and cranes are already in place, any delay would
necessarily prolong the construction operation and increase its cost to
the public. For engineering reasons, to allow the lifting of huge steel
girders that will span the main channel, construction equipment must be
placed across the entire channel. For each day that construction was
delayed due to the inability to place equipment in the main channel, RI
DOT estimated it would cost Rhode Island taxpayers $100,000. The Coast
Guard and RI DOT, after consulting with local elected and appointed
officials and harbormasters, concluded that allowing the construction
equipment to obstruct the main channel, coupled with a temporary
channel around the construction to be established by the Coast Guard,
was the preferred alternative.
We were concerned that the waterway obstruction proposed by RI DOT
might have a significant impact on waterway users, so it was necessary
to move quickly to protect the safety of workers and the public, and
facilitate construction during optimal weather conditions that were
deemed by RI DOT as an engineering necessity. Because of the cost to
the public of any construction delay, and because the imminence of the
planned construction work left insufficient time for compliance with
APA notice and comment procedures, it would have been contrary to the
public interest and impracticable to follow those procedures before
issuing this rule. Moreover, to the extent we had met with many of the
persons most likely to be affected by the rule and we addressed many of
their concerns in drafting this rule, following APA notice and comment
procedures before issuing this rule was unnecessary. In order to
address any further public concerns, this rule is available for
subsequent public comment as long as it is in force, and if comments
indicate a need to amend the rule, we will consider doing so.
For the same reasons, we also find that good cause exists, under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), for making this rule effective less than 30 days
after publication in the Federal Register.
Basis and Purpose
Under the Ports and Waterways Safety Act, the Coast Guard has the
authority to establish RNAs in defined water areas that are determined
to have hazardous conditions and in which vessel traffic can be
regulated in the interest of safety. See 33 U.S.C. 1231 and Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
The purpose of this rule is to ensure the safety of waterway users,
the public, and construction workers for the duration of the new Route
24 bridge construction over the main channel of the Sakonnet River
during construction operations.
Discussion of Rule
This action is intended to control vessel traffic for the duration
of the new Route 24 bridge construction over the main channel of the
Sakonnet River. Construction is now underway and may last until May 1,
2013. The Coast Guard may close the regulated area described in this
rule to all vessel traffic during any circumstance that poses an
imminent threat to waterway users operating in the area. Complete
waterway closures will be made with as much advance notice as possible.
During the period where the main channel of the Sakonnet River is
obstructed and a temporary channel is established, both the aids to
navigation marking the temporary channel and navigation safety measures
will be published with the widest distribution among the affected
segments of the public. Such means of notification will include, but is
not limited to, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, Local Notice to Mariners,
and Marine Safety Information Bulletins distributed by e-mail to the
local maritime community, including every person who attended the
meetings noted above and who provided an e-mail address upon
registering.
Entry into this RNA during a closure is prohibited unless
authorized by the Sector Southeastern New England Captain of the Port
(COTP). Any
[[Page 57912]]
violation of this RNA is punishable by civil and criminal penalties, in
rem liability against the offending vessel, and the initiation of
suspension or revocation proceedings against Coast Guard-issued
merchant-mariner credentials.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, and does not require an
assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of
that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it
under that Order.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities some of which
may be small entities: The owners or operators of local marinas and
businesses (such as waterside restaurants), or vessels who intend to
transit in the Sakonnet River beneath the new Route 24 bridge between
September 9, 2011 and May 1, 2013.
This regulation may have some impact on small entities, but the
potential impact will be minimized for the following reasons: Any
temporary channel or other safety measures will allow most mariners to
continue to transit the Sakonnet River beneath the new Route 24 bridge.
Additionally, vessels can bypass the Sakonnet River by using an
alternate route up through the East Passage of Narragansett Bay to
reach a destination above the Route 24 Bridge. We expect that any
complete closure of the RNA will be brief. We will use various
appropriate means to inform the public before, during, and at the
conclusion of any RNA enforcement period.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. If this rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please call LT Judson Coleman, Prevention
Department, Sector Long Island Sound, at 203-468-4596.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in
this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have Tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an
[[Page 57913]]
explanation of why using these standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards
are technical standards (e.g., specifications of materials,
performance, design, or operation; test methods; sampling procedures;
and related management systems practices) that are developed or adopted
by voluntary consensus standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves the establishing of a
regulated navigation area and therefore falls within the categorical
exclusion noted above. An environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. Any comments received concerning
environmental impacts will be considered and changes made to the
environmental analysis checklist and categorical exclusion
determination as appropriate.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T01-0868 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T01-0868 Regulated Navigation Area; Route 24 Bridge
Construction, Sakonnet River, Rhode Island.
(a) Location. The following area is a regulated navigation area:
All navigable waters of the Sakonnet River between Tiverton and
Portsmouth, RI, from surface to bottom, within 100 yards of the Route
24 bridge over the Sakonnet River.
(b) Regulations. The general regulations contained in 33 CFR
165.10, 165.11, and 165.13 apply within the RNA, and in addition:
(1) Each person or vessel within the RNA must comply with the
directions of the Captain of the Port Sector Southeastern New England
(COTP) or the COTP's designated on-scene patrol personnel and must
comply with all applicable regulations including but not limited to the
Rules of the Road (33 CFR Subchapter E, Inland Navigational Rules);
(2) The COTP may close the RNA or establish a marked temporary
channel within the RNA at any time to protect public safety;
(3) Each vessel using the temporary channel must not exceed 47 feet
in height from the waterline, have a draft not exceeding 17 feet, and
enter the temporary channel only if it is completely clear of all other
vessel traffic; and
(4) Each vessel approaching the temporary channel and equipped with
a VHF radio must make an appropriate ``Securite'' radio call to notify
approaching vessel traffic;
(c) Effective period; enforcement. This section is effective from 8
a.m. on September 9, 2011, until 11:59 p.m. on May 1, 2013. Paragraph
(b) of this section may be enforced at any time within that period. The
COTP and designated on-scene patrol personnel will notify the public
whenever paragraph (b) is in force and whenever enforcement is lifted.
Notification may be by Broadcast Notice to Mariners, Local Notice to
Mariners, Marine Safety Information Bulletins, or by siren, radio,
flashing light, or other hailing by a Coast Guard vessel.
(d) Violations. Report violations of this regulated navigation area
to the COTP at 508-457-3211 or on VHF-Channel 16.
Dated: September 7, 2011.
D.A. Neptun,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2011-23916 Filed 9-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P