Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Notice of Issuance of Director's Decision, 57766-57767 [2011-23787]
Download as PDF
57766
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2011 / Notices
Conservation Act of 1978, Public Law
95–541.
The National Science
Foundation (NSF) is required to publish
notice of permit applications received to
conduct activities regulated under the
Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978.
NSF has published regulations under
the Antarctic Conservation Act at Title
45 Part 670 of the Code of Federal
Regulations. This is the required notice
of permit applications received.
DATES: Interested parties are invited to
submit written data, comments, or
views with respect to this permit
application by October 17, 2011. This
application may be inspected by
interested parties at the Permit Office,
address below.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be
addressed to Permit Office, Room 755,
Office of Polar Programs, National
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson
Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Polly A. Penhale at the above address or
(703) 292–7420.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
National Science Foundation, as
directed by the Antarctic Conservation
Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95–541), as
amended by the Antarctic Science,
Tourism and Conservation Act of 1996,
has developed regulations for the
establishment of a permit system for
various activities in Antarctica and
designation of certain animals and
certain geographic areas requiring
special protection. The regulations
establish such a permit system to
designate Antarctic Specially Protected
Areas.
The applications received are as
follows:
SUMMARY:
Permit Application: 2012–007.
1. Applicant: Paul Morin, Department
of Geology And Geophysics, University
of Minnesota, 310 Pillsbury Drive, SE.,
Minneapolis, MN 55455.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Activity for Which Permit Is Requested
Enter an Antarctic Specially Protected
Area. The applicant plans to enter the
Antarctic Specially Protect Areas at
Cape Royds, Ross Island (ASPA 121)
and Cape Crozier (ASPA 124) to collect
ground control with highly precise GPS
equipment. The applicant will seek out
readily identifiable boulders and peaks
gathering precise GPS coordinates of
that location, and taking notes and
picture of the surrounding area. Other
activities would include delineating
boundaries of penguin colonies, ASPAs,
and important environmental features.
The data collected will be used to create
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Sep 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
accurate maps of areas of important
scientific and environmental
importance within the Ross Sea region.
Location
ASPA 121—Cape Royds, Ross Island,
and ASPA 124—Cape Crozier, Ross
Island.
Dates
October 10, 2011 to January 31, 2012.
Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer, Office of Polar Programs.
[FR Doc. 2011–23707 Filed 9–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–271; NRC–2011–0074;
License No. DPR–28]
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC
and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.;
Notice of Issuance of Director’s
Decision
Notice is hereby given that the
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, has issued a Director’s
Decision with regard to a petition dated
January 14, 2011, Mr. Thomas Saporito,
hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘petitioner.’’ The petition concerns the
operation of the Vermont Yankee
Nuclear Power Station (VY).
The petition requested that the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC):
(1) Issue a confirmatory order requiring
the licensee to immediately bring the
reactor in question to a cold shutdown
mode of operation; (2) issue a civil
penalty against the licensee; (3) remove
the licensee’s employees responsible for
this matter from NRC licensed activities
for a period of no less than 5 years; and
(4) perform an immediate NRC
investigation and inspection of VY to
ensure that all nuclear safety-related
systems are properly operational in
accordance with the licensee’s technical
specification and NRC license.
The petition raises concerns
originating from inoperability of main
steam safety relief valves (SRVs) due to
leakage through the shaft to piston
thread seals. This event did potentially
affect the ability of the SRVs to perform
their manual and Automatic
Depressurization System (ADS) function
since the combined thread seal leakage
and accumulator leakage impacted the
ability of the SRVs to satisfy design
actuation requirements. Due to the
redundancy in ADS design, the
availability of the high-pressure core
injection system, and the availability of
a safety-class backup nitrogen supply,
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the ability to depressurize the reactor
was maintained, and there was no
potential adverse impact to public
health and safety.
The Petition Review Board (PRB) met
on February 2, 2011, and made an initial
recommendation to accept the petition,
in part, concerning the failure of relief
valve because this issue met the criteria
for review. The NRC communicated this
decision to the petitioner, who
requested an opportunity to address the
PRB to provide comments to the PRB’s
initial recommendation and additional
information in support of the petition.
By teleconference on February 14, 2011,
the petitioner provided information to
the PRB in support of the request for an
immediate shutdown and an immediate
NRC investigation and inspection of VY.
The PRB confirmed its initial
recommendation because the additional
information provided on February 14,
2011, did not change the PRB’s decision
to deny the request for immediate
action.
The NRC sent a copy of the proposed
Director’s Decision to the petitioner and
the licensee for comment on July 14,
2011. The staff has not received any
comments from the licensee. The
petitioner responded with comments on
August 1, 2011, which have been
addressed in the Director’s Decision.
Copies of the petition (Agencywide
Documents Access and Management
System (ADAMS) Accession No.
ML110190233) and the Director’s
Decision (ADAMS Accession No.
ML112240960) are available for
inspection at the Commission’s Public
Document Room (PDR) at One White
Flint North, Public File Area O1 F21,
11555 Rockville Pike (first floor),
Rockville, Maryland, and electronically
in the NRC Library at https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
NRC Management Directive 8.11,
‘‘Review Process for 10 CFR 2.206
Petitions’’ (ADAMS Accession No.
ML041770328), describes the petition
review process. Persons who do not
have access to ADAMS or who have
problems in accessing the documents in
ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR
reference staff by telephone at 1–800–
397–4209 or 301–415–4737, or by e-mail
to PDR-Resource@nrc.gov.
A copy of the Director’s Decision will
be filed with the Secretary of the
Commission for the Commission’s
review in accordance with 10 CFR 2.206
of the Commission’s regulations. As
provided for by this regulation, the
Director’s Decision will constitute the
final action of the Commission 25 days
after the date of the decision, unless the
Commission, on its own motion,
E:\FR\FM\16SEN1.SGM
16SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2011 / Notices
institutes a review of the Director’s
Decision in that time.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 9th day
of September 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Eric J. Leeds,
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day
of September, 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Cindy Bladey,
Chief, Rules, Announcements and Directives
Branch, Division of Administrative Services,
Office of Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–23706 Filed 9–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
[FR Doc. 2011–23787 Filed 9–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. A2011–64; Order No. 847]
Post Office Closing
[NRC–2011–0204]
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Draft generic letter; comment
period extension and correction.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is correcting a notice
appearing in the Federal Register on
September 1, 2011 (76 FR 54507), that
requested public comment on Draft NRC
Generic Letter 2011–XX: Seismic Risk
Evaluations for Operating Reactors. This
action is necessary to correct the Docket
ID information for submitting comments
and accessing publicly available
documents related to the draft generic
letter in the ADDRESSES section and the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
Due to this error, the NRC is extending
the comment period from October 31,
2011, to November 15, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cindy Bladey, Chief, Rules,
Announcements and Directives Branch,
Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–492–
3667 or e-mail: Cindy.Bladey@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On page
54507 of Federal Register document
2011–22422, published September 1,
2011 (76 FR 54507), in the second
column, under the section titled
ADDRESSES, first paragraph, ‘‘NRC–
2011–0201’’ is corrected to read ‘‘NRC–
2011–0204.’’ Also, on page 54507 of the
same document, in the second column,
under the section titled ADDRESSES, first
bulleted item, ‘‘NRC–2011–0201’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘NRC–2011–0204.’’
On page 54508 of the same document,
in the first column, under the section
titled SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION,
second bulleted item, ‘‘NRC–2011–
0201’’ is corrected to read ‘‘NRC–2011–
0204.’’
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Sep 15, 2011
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
Proposed Generic Communication;
Draft NRC Generic Letter 2011–XX:
Seismic Risk Evaluations for Operating
Reactors
Jkt 223001
ACTION:
This document informs the
public that an appeal of the closing of
the Ionia, Iowa post office has been
filed. It identifies preliminary steps and
provides a procedural schedule.
Publication of this document will allow
the Postal Service, petitioners, and
others to take appropriate action.
DATES: Administrative record due (from
Postal Service): September 21, 2011;
deadline for notices to intervene:
October 4, 2011. See the Procedural
Schedule in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for other dates of
interest.
SUMMARY:
Submit comments
electronically by accessing the ‘‘Filing
Online’’ link in the banner at the top of
the Commission’s Web site (https://
www.prc.gov) or by directly accessing
the Commission’s Filing Online system
at https://www.prc.gov/prc-pages/filingonline/login.aspx. Commenters who
cannot submit their views electronically
should contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section as the source for case-related
information for advice on alternatives to
electronic filing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
at 202–789–6820 (case-related
information) or DocketAdmins@prc.gov
(electronic filing assistance).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C.
404(d), on September 6, 2011, the
Commission received a petition for
review of the Postal Service’s
determination to close the Ionia post
office in Ionia, Missouri. The petition
was filed by William Smart, Mayor of
the City of Ionia, Missouri (Petitioner)
and was received by the Commission on
August 31, 2011. The Commission
hereby institutes a proceeding under 39
U.S.C. 404(d)(5) and establishes Docket
No. A2011–64 to consider Petitioner’s
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57767
appeal. If Petitioner would like to
further explain his position with
supplemental information or facts,
Petitioner may either file a Participant
Statement on PRC Form 61 or file a brief
with the Commission no later than
October 11, 2011.
Categories of issues apparently raised.
Petitioner contends that: (1) The Postal
Service failed to consider the effect of
the closing on the community (see 39
U.S.C. 404(d)(2)(A)(i)); and (2) the Postal
Service failed to consider whether or
not it will continue to provide a
maximum degree of effective and
regular postal services to the community
(see 39 U.S.C. 404(d)(2)(A)(iii)).
After the Postal Service files the
administrative record and the
Commission reviews it, the Commission
may find that there are more legal issues
than those set forth above, or that the
Postal Service’s determination disposes
of one or more of those issues. The
deadline for the Postal Service to file the
applicable administrative record with
the Commission is September 21, 2011.
See 39 CFR 3001.113. In addition, the
due date for any responsive pleading by
the Postal Service to this Notice is
September 21, 2011.
Availability; Web site posting. The
Commission has posted the appeal and
supporting material on its Web site at
https://www.prc.gov. Additional filings
in this case and participants’
submissions also will be posted on the
Commission’s Web site, if provided in
electronic format or amenable to
conversion, and not subject to a valid
protective order. Information on how to
use the Commission’s Web site is
available online or by contacting the
Commission’s webmaster via telephone
at 202–789–6873 or via electronic mail
at prc-webmaster@prc.gov.
The appeal and all related documents
are also available for public inspection
in the Commission’s docket section.
Docket section hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., eastern time, Monday through
Friday, except on Federal government
holidays. Docket section personnel may
be contacted via electronic mail at prcdockets@prc.gov or via telephone at
202–789–6846.
Filing of documents. All filings of
documents in this case shall be made
using the Internet (Filing Online)
pursuant to Commission rules 9(a) and
10(a) at the Commission’s Web site,
https://www.prc.gov, unless a waiver is
obtained. See 39 CFR 3001.9(a) and
3001.10(a). Instructions for obtaining an
account to file documents online may be
found on the Commission’s Web site or
by contacting the Commission’s docket
section at prc-dockets@prc.gov or via
telephone at 202–789–6846.
E:\FR\FM\16SEN1.SGM
16SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 180 (Friday, September 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57766-57767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23787]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-271; NRC-2011-0074; License No. DPR-28]
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC and Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc.; Notice of Issuance of Director's Decision
Notice is hereby given that the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, has issued a Director's Decision with regard to a petition
dated January 14, 2011, Mr. Thomas Saporito, hereinafter referred to as
the ``petitioner.'' The petition concerns the operation of the Vermont
Yankee Nuclear Power Station (VY).
The petition requested that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC): (1) Issue a confirmatory order requiring the licensee to
immediately bring the reactor in question to a cold shutdown mode of
operation; (2) issue a civil penalty against the licensee; (3) remove
the licensee's employees responsible for this matter from NRC licensed
activities for a period of no less than 5 years; and (4) perform an
immediate NRC investigation and inspection of VY to ensure that all
nuclear safety-related systems are properly operational in accordance
with the licensee's technical specification and NRC license.
The petition raises concerns originating from inoperability of main
steam safety relief valves (SRVs) due to leakage through the shaft to
piston thread seals. This event did potentially affect the ability of
the SRVs to perform their manual and Automatic Depressurization System
(ADS) function since the combined thread seal leakage and accumulator
leakage impacted the ability of the SRVs to satisfy design actuation
requirements. Due to the redundancy in ADS design, the availability of
the high-pressure core injection system, and the availability of a
safety-class backup nitrogen supply, the ability to depressurize the
reactor was maintained, and there was no potential adverse impact to
public health and safety.
The Petition Review Board (PRB) met on February 2, 2011, and made
an initial recommendation to accept the petition, in part, concerning
the failure of relief valve because this issue met the criteria for
review. The NRC communicated this decision to the petitioner, who
requested an opportunity to address the PRB to provide comments to the
PRB's initial recommendation and additional information in support of
the petition. By teleconference on February 14, 2011, the petitioner
provided information to the PRB in support of the request for an
immediate shutdown and an immediate NRC investigation and inspection of
VY. The PRB confirmed its initial recommendation because the additional
information provided on February 14, 2011, did not change the PRB's
decision to deny the request for immediate action.
The NRC sent a copy of the proposed Director's Decision to the
petitioner and the licensee for comment on July 14, 2011. The staff has
not received any comments from the licensee. The petitioner responded
with comments on August 1, 2011, which have been addressed in the
Director's Decision.
Copies of the petition (Agencywide Documents Access and Management
System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML110190233) and the Director's Decision
(ADAMS Accession No. ML112240960) are available for inspection at the
Commission's Public Document Room (PDR) at One White Flint North,
Public File Area O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville,
Maryland, and electronically in the NRC Library at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. NRC Management Directive 8.11, ``Review Process
for 10 CFR 2.206 Petitions'' (ADAMS Accession No. ML041770328),
describes the petition review process. Persons who do not have access
to ADAMS or who have problems in accessing the documents in ADAMS
should contact the NRC PDR reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-
4209 or 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to PDR-Resource@nrc.gov.
A copy of the Director's Decision will be filed with the Secretary
of the Commission for the Commission's review in accordance with 10 CFR
2.206 of the Commission's regulations. As provided for by this
regulation, the Director's Decision will constitute the final action of
the Commission 25 days after the date of the decision, unless the
Commission, on its own motion,
[[Page 57767]]
institutes a review of the Director's Decision in that time.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 9th day of September 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Eric J. Leeds,
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2011-23787 Filed 9-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P