Swap Exclusion for Section 1256 Contracts, 57684-57690 [2011-23665]
Download as PDF
57684
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(e) Part 542—Minimum Internal Control
Standards.
Group 2 included a review of:
(a) Part 573—Enforcement; and
(b) Regulations concerning proceedings
before the Commission, including:
Parts 519—Service, Part 524—
Appeals, Part 539—Appeals, and Part
577—Appeals Before the Commission.
Group 3 included a review of:
(a) Part 543—Minimum Internal
Control Standards for Class II Gaming;
and
(b) Part 547—Minimum Technical
Standards for Gaming Equipment
Used With the Play of Class II Games.
Group 4 included a review of:
(a) Part 556—Background Investigations
for Primary Management Officials and
Key Employees;
(b) Part 558—Gaming Licenses for Key
Employees and Primary Management
Officials;
(c) Part 571—Monitoring and
Investigations;
(d) Part 531—Collateral Agreements;
(e) Part 537—Background Investigations
for Persons or Entities With a
Financial Interest in, or Having
Management Responsibility for, a
Management Contract; and
(f) Part 502—Definitions.
Group 5 included a review of:
(a) Part 518—Self Regulation of Class II
Gaming;
(b) A Sole Proprietary Interest
regulation; and
(c) Class III MICS.
The Commission has conducted 12
consultations since April 2011 and will
continue consultations on the
regulations, however, the Commission
has removed Group 3 regulations (Class
II MICS and Technical Standards) and
Class III MICS from the current
consultation schedule. A Tribal
Advisory Committee will review those
regulations during a separate meeting
schedule. The Commission intends to
consult with Tribes on Group 3
regulations and Class III MICS after
completion of the Tribal Advisory
Committee process.
This document advises the public that
the following Tribal consultation has
been changed to a one day consultation
in Rapid City, South Dakota.
Consultation date
Event
Location
November 14–15, 2011 .............................
NIGC Consultation—California .................
Spa Resort Casino, Palm Springs, CA .....
Consultation date
Event
Location
November 14, 2011 ...................................
NIGC Consultation—Great Plains .............
Hilton Garden Inn, Rapid City, SD ............
Regulation
group(s)
5
New date and location:
For additional information on
consultation locations and times, please
refer to the Web site of the National
Indian Gaming Commission, https://
www.nigc.gov.
Dated: September 12, 2011 in Washington,
DC.
Tracie L. Stevens,
Chairwoman.
Steffani A. Cochran,
Vice-Chairwoman.
Daniel J. Little,
Associate Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 2011–23729 Filed 9–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
WREIER-aviles on DSK29S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–111283–11]
RIN 1545–BK22
Swap Exclusion for Section 1256
Contracts
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
and notice of public hearing.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 Sep 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
This document contains
proposed regulations that describe
swaps and similar agreements that fall
within the meaning of section
1256(b)(2)(B) of the Internal Revenue
Code (Code). This document also
contains proposed regulations that
revise the definition of a notional
principal contract under § 1.446–3 of
the Income Tax Regulations. This
document provides a notice of public
hearing on these proposed regulations.
DATES: Written or electronic comments
must be received by December 15, 2011.
Outlines of topics to be discussed at the
public hearing scheduled for January 19,
2012, must be received by December 14,
2011.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–111283–11), Room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, POB
7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington
DC 20044. Submissions may be hand
delivered Monday through Friday,
between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–111283–11),
Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC. Alternatively,
taxpayers may submit comments
electronically via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov/ (IRS–REG–
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Regulation
group(s)
1, 2, 4, 5
111283–11). The public hearing will be
held in the Auditorium, Internal
Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations, K.
Scott Brown (202) 622–7454; concerning
submissions of comments, the hearing,
and/or to be placed on the building
access list to attend the hearing, Richard
Hurst, (202) 622–7180 (not toll-free
numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains proposed
amendments to the Income Tax
Regulations (26 CFR part 1) under
sections 1256 and 446 of the Code.
Section 1256(b)(2)(B) was added to the
Code by section 1601 of the Dodd-Frank
Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act (Pub. L. 111–203, 1601,
124 Stat. 1376, 2223 (2010)) (the DoddFrank Act). Section 1256(b)(2)(B)
provides that certain swaps and similar
agreements are not subject to section
1256 of the Code. These proposed
regulations provide guidance on the
category of swaps and similar
agreements that are within the scope of
section 1256(b)(2)(B). These proposed
regulations also revise the definition
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2011 / Proposed Rules
and scope of a notional principal
contract under § 1.446–3 of the Income
Tax Regulations.
Explanation of Provisions
A. Section 1256(b)(2)(B) Language and
Legislative History
Section 1256 provides that contracts
classified as section 1256 contracts are
marked to market and any gain or loss
is generally treated as 60 percent longterm capital gain or loss and 40 percent
short-term capital gain or loss. Section
1256(b)(1) defines the term ‘‘section
1256 contract’’ as a regulated futures
contract, foreign currency contract,
nonequity option, dealer equity option,
and dealer securities futures contract.
With the exception of a foreign currency
contract, a section 1256 contract must
be traded on or subject to the rules of
a ‘‘qualified board or exchange’’ as
defined in section 1256(g)(7).
Section 1601 of the Dodd-Frank Act
added section 1256(b)(2)(B), which
excludes swaps and similar agreements
from the definition of a section 1256
contract. Section 1256(b)(2)(B) provides
that the term ‘‘section 1256 contract’’
shall not include—
any interest rate swap, currency swap, basis
swap, interest rate cap, interest rate floor,
commodity swap, equity swap, equity index
swap, credit default swap, or similar
agreement.
Congress enacted section
1256(b)(2)(B) to resolve uncertainty
under section 1256 for swap contracts
that are traded on regulated exchanges.
The specific uncertainty addressed by
the enactment of section 1256(b)(2)(B)
was described in the Conference Report:
The title contains a provision to address
the recharacterization of income as a result
of increased exchange-trading of derivatives
contracts by clarifying that section 1256 of
the Internal Revenue Code does not apply to
certain derivatives contracts transacted on
exchanges.
WREIER-aviles on DSK29S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 111–517, at 879
(2010).
Section 1256(b)(2)(B) contemplates
that a swap contract, even if traded on
or subject to the rules of a qualified
board or exchange, will not be a section
1256 contract.
B. Scope of Swaps Excluded by Section
1256(b)(2)(B)
1. Notional Principal Contracts and
Credit Default Swaps
Congress incorporated into section
1256(b)(2)(B) a list of swaps that
parallels the list of swaps included
under the definition of a notional
principal contract in § 1.446–3(c) with
the addition of credit default swaps. The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 Sep 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
parallel language suggests that Congress
was attempting to harmonize the
category of swaps excluded under
section 1256(b)(2)(B) with swaps that
qualify as notional principal contracts
under § 1.446–3(c), rather than with the
contracts defined as ‘‘swaps’’ under
section 721 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
Accordingly, § 1.1256(b)–1(a) of the
proposed regulations provides that a
section 1256 contract does not include
a contract that qualifies as a notional
principal contract as defined in
proposed § 1.446–3(c). As discussed
herein, the proposed regulations under
§ 1.446–3 also expressly provide that a
credit default swap is a notional
principal contract.
2. Option on a Notional Principal
Contract
Section 1256(b)(2)(B) raises questions
as to whether an option on a notional
principal contract that is traded on a
qualified board or exchange would
constitute a ‘‘similar agreement’’ or
would instead be treated as a nonequity
option under section 1256(g)(3). Since
an option on a notional principal
contract is closely connected with the
underlying contract, the Treasury
Department and the IRS believe that
such an option should be treated as a
similar agreement within the meaning of
section 1256(b)(2)(B). Accordingly,
§ 1.1256(b)–1(a) of the proposed
regulations also provides that a section
1256 contract does not include an
option on any contract that is a notional
principal contract defined in § 1.446–
3(c) of the proposed regulations.
3. Ordering Rule
The proposed regulations provide an
ordering rule for a contract that trades
as a futures contract regulated by the
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (CFTC), but that also meets
the definition of a notional principal
contract. The Treasury Department and
the IRS believe that such a contract is
not a commodity futures contract of the
kind envisioned by Congress when it
enacted section 1256. Accordingly,
§ 1.1256(b)–1(a) of the proposed
regulations provides that section 1256
does not include any contract, or option
on such contract, that is both a section
1256 contract and a notional principal
contract as defined in § 1.446–3(c) of the
proposed regulations.
C. Definition of Regulated Futures
Contract
Section 1256(g)(1) defines a regulated
futures contract as ‘‘a contract (A) with
respect to which the amount required to
be deposited and the amount which
may be withdrawn depends on a system
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57685
of marking to market, and (B) which is
traded on or subject to the rules of a
qualified board or exchange.’’ The
apparent breadth of section 1256(g)(1)
has raised questions in the past as to
whether a contract other than a futures
contract can be a regulated futures
contract. The Treasury Department and
the IRS have historically limited the
scope of a regulated futures contract to
those futures contracts that have the
characteristics of traditional futures
contracts. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, a
‘‘designated contract market’’ may trade
both futures contracts and swap
contracts, although there will be specific
reporting rules for swap contracts. In
order to properly limit section 1256 to
futures contracts that trade on
designated contract markets,
§ 1.1256(b)–1(b) of the proposed
regulations provides that a regulated
futures contract is a section 1256
contract only if the contract is a futures
contract that is not required to be
reported as a swap under the
Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1)
(the CEA). The reporting provisions for
swaps under the CEA will not be
effective until the CFTC has published
final rules implementing such
provisions. It is anticipated that swap
reporting rules will be in effect before
these regulations are finalized. If,
however, these proposed income tax
regulations are finalized before the swap
reporting provisions become effective,
the Treasury Department and the IRS
will evaluate whether the provisions of
§ 1.1256(b)–1(b) need to be adjusted.
Questions have also been raised as to
whether the requirement that a
regulated futures contract be ‘‘traded on
or subject to the rules of’’ a qualified
board or exchange includes offexchange transactions such as an
exchange of a futures contract for a cash
commodity, or an exchange of a futures
contract for a swap, that are carried out
subject to the rules of a CFTC
designated contract market. The phrase
‘‘traded on or subject to the rules of’’
appears to have originated under the
CEA. Section 4(a) of the CEA provides,
in part, that it is unlawful to engage in
any transaction in, or in connection
with, a commodity futures contract
unless such transaction is conducted on
or subject to the rules of a board of trade
which has been designated as a contract
market and such contract is executed or
consummated by or through a contract
market. Section 5(d) of the CEA, as
amended by section 735 of the DoddFrank Act, provides that the rules of a
designated contract market may
authorize, for bona fide business
purposes, transfer trades or office trades,
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
57686
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2011 / Proposed Rules
WREIER-aviles on DSK29S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
or an exchange of (i) Futures in
connection with a cash commodity
transaction, (ii) futures for cash
commodities, or (iii) futures for swaps.
As such, the Treasury Department and
the IRS believe that a futures contract
that results from one of these
transactions is a regulated futures
contract under section 1256(g)(1)
because the contract is traded subject to
the rules of a designated contract
market.
D. Qualified Board or Exchange
Section 1256(g)(7)(C) provides that a
qualified board or exchange includes
any other exchange, board of trade, or
other market which the Secretary
determines has rules adequate to carry
out the purposes of section 1256.
Section 1.1256(g)–1(a) of the proposed
regulations specifies that such
determinations are only made through
published guidance in the Federal
Register or in the Internal Revenue
Bulletin.
Since section 1256(g)(7) was adopted,
the Treasury Department and the IRS
have issued determinations for six
entities, all of them foreign futures
exchanges. See Rev. Rul. 2010–3 (2010–
1 CB 272 (London International
Financial Futures and Options
Exchange)), Rev. Rul. 2009–24 (2009–2
CB 306 (ICE Futures Canada)), Rev. Rul.
2009–4 (2009–1 CB 408 (Dubai
Mercantile Exchange)), Rev. Rul. 2007–
26 (2007–1 CB 970 (ICE Futures)), Rev.
Rul. 86–7 (1986–1 CB 295 (The
Mercantile Division of the Montreal
Exchange)), and Rev. Rul. 85–72 (1985–
1 CB 286 (International Futures
Exchange (Bermuda))). The IRS has
followed a two step process for making
each of the six qualified board or
exchange determinations under section
1256(g)(7). See § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b).
In the first step, the exchange
submitted a private letter ruling to the
IRS requesting a determination that the
exchange is a qualified board or
exchange within the meaning of section
1256(g)(7)(C). Once the IRS determined
that the exchange had rules sufficient to
carry out the purposes of section 1256,
the Treasury Department and the IRS
published a revenue ruling announcing
that the named exchange was a qualified
board or exchange. The revenue rulings
apply to commodity futures contracts
and futures contract options of the type
described under the CEA that are
entered into on the named exchange.
The revenue ruling does not apply to
contracts that are entered into on
another exchange that is affiliated with
the named exchange.
In determining whether a foreign
exchange is a qualified board or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 Sep 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
exchange under section 1256(g)(7)(C),
the Treasury Department and the IRS
have looked to whether the exchange
received a CFTC ‘‘direct access’’ noaction relief letter permitting the
exchange to make its electronic trading
and matching system available in the
United States, notwithstanding that the
exchange was not designated as a
contract market pursuant to section 5 of
the CEA. Section 738 of the Dodd-Frank
Act, however, provides the CFTC with
authority to adopt rules and regulations
that require registration of a foreign
board of trade that provides United
States participants direct access to the
foreign board of trade’s electronic
trading system. In formulating these
rules and regulations, the CFTC is
directed to consider whether
comparable supervision and regulation
exists in the foreign board of trade’s
home country. Pursuant to section 738,
the CFTC has proposed a registration
system to replace the direct access noaction letter process. Under the
proposed registration system, a foreign
board of trade operating pursuant to an
existing direct access no-action relief
letter must apply through a limited
application process for an ‘‘Order of
Registration’’ which will replace the
foreign board of trade’s existing direct
access no-action letter. Many of the
proposed requirements for and
conditions applied to a foreign board of
trade’s registration will be based upon
those applicable to the foreign board of
trade’s currently granted direct access
no-action relief letter.
The IRS has conditioned a foreign
exchange’s qualified board or exchange
status under section 1256(g)(7)(C) on the
exchange continuing to satisfy all CFTC
conditions necessary to retain its direct
access no-action relief letter.
Consequently, if the CFTC adopts the
proposed registration system, an
exchange that has previously received a
qualified board or exchange
determination under section
1256(g)(7)(C) must obtain a CFTC Order
of Registration in order to maintain its
qualified board or exchange status. The
IRS will continue to evaluate the CFTC’s
rules in this regard to determine if any
changes to the IRS’s section
1256(g)(7)(C) guidance process are
warranted.
E. Definition and Scope of a Notional
Principal Contract
1. Payments Under a Notional Principal
Contract
In 1993, the IRS promulgated § 1.446–
3(c) which defines a notional principal
contract as a financial instrument that
provides for the payment of amounts by
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
one party to another at specified
intervals calculated by reference to a
specified index upon a notional
principal amount in exchange for
specified consideration or a promise to
pay similar amounts. Questions have
arisen as to the proper interpretation of
this requirement. Sections 1.446–
3(c)(1)(i) and (ii) of the proposed
regulations expressly provide that a
notional principal contract requires one
party to make two or more payments to
a counterparty. For this purpose, the
fixing of an amount is treated as a
payment, even if the actual payment
reflecting that amount is to be made at
a later date. Thus, for example, a
contract that provides for a settlement
payment referenced to the appreciation
or depreciation on a specified number of
shares of common stock, adjusted for
actual dividends paid during the term of
the contract, is treated as a contract with
more than one payment with respect to
that leg of the contract.
2. Credit Default Swaps
In Notice 2004–52 (2004–2 CB 168),
the Treasury Department and the IRS
described four possible
characterizations of a credit default
swap. See § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b). These
proposed regulations resolve this
uncertainty by adding credit default
swaps to the list of swaps categorized as
notional principal contracts governed by
the rules of § 1.446–3.
3. Weather-Related and Other NonFinancial Index Based Swaps
Since the time that the § 1.446–3
regulations were promulgated, markets
have developed for contracts based on
non-financial indices. Many of these
contracts are structured as swaps, and
payments are calculated based on
indices such as temperature,
precipitation, snowfall, or frost. For
example, payments made under a
weather derivative may be based on
heating degree days and cooling degree
days. As a technical matter, a weatherrelated swap currently is not a notional
principal contract because a weather
index does not qualify as a ‘‘specified
index’’ under § 1.446–3(c)(2) of the
current regulations, which generally
require that such index be a financial
index.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
believe that swaps on non-financial
indices should be treated as notional
principal contracts. Accordingly,
§ 1.446–3(c)(2)(ii) of the proposed
regulations expands a specified index to
include non-financial indices that are
comprised of any objectively
determinable information that is not
within the control of any of the parties
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2011 / Proposed Rules
to the contract and is not unique to one
of the parties’ circumstances, and that
cannot be reasonably expected to frontload or back-load payments accruing
under the contract.
4. Excluded Contracts
Section 1.446–3(c)(1)(ii) currently
provides that a contract described in
section 1256(b) and a futures contract
are not notional principal contracts. In
order to remove the circularity that
would otherwise exist between
excluded contracts under § 1.446–
3(c)(1)(ii) and proposed § 1.1256(b)–1, a
contract described in section 1256(b)
and a futures contract have been deleted
from excluded contracts under proposed
§ 1.446–3(c)(1)(iv).
5. Conforming Amendments
The definition of a notional principal
contract in § 1.446–3(c) of the proposed
regulations is intended to be the
operative definition for all Federal
income tax purposes, except where a
different or more limited definition is
specifically prescribed. Thus, the
regulations under sections 512, 863,
954, and 988 have been amended to
reference the definition of a notional
principal contract in § 1.446–3(c).
WREIER-aviles on DSK29S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Proposed Effective/Applicability Date
These regulations are proposed to
apply to contracts entered into on or
after the date the final regulations are
published in the Federal Register.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice
of proposed rulemaking is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It
has also been determined that section
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply
to these regulations, and because the
regulation does not impose a collection
of information on small entitles, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6) does not apply. Pursuant to
section 7805(f) of the Code, this notice
of proposed rulemaking will be
submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its
impact on small business.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any
written comments (a signed original and
eight (8) copies) or electronic comments
that are submitted timely to the IRS. The
Treasury Department and IRS invite
comments on the clarity of the proposed
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 Sep 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
rules and how they can be made easier
to understand. All comments will be
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or upon request.
A public hearing has been scheduled
for January 19, 2012, beginning at 10
a.m. in the Auditorium, Internal
Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. Due to
building security procedures, visitors
must enter at the Constitution Avenue
entrance. In addition, all visitors must
present photo identification to enter the
building. Because of access restrictions,
visitors will not be admitted beyond the
immediate entrance area more than 30
minutes before the hearing starts. For
information about having your name
placed on the building access list to
attend the hearing, see the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble.
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3)
apply to the hearing. Persons who wish
to present oral comments at the hearing
must submit written or electronic
comments by December 15, 2011 and an
outline of the topics to be discussed and
the time to be devoted to each topic (a
signed original and eight (8) copies) by
December 14, 2011. A period of 10
minutes will be allotted to each person
for making comments. An agenda
showing the scheduling of the speakers
will be prepared after the deadline for
receiving outlines has passed. Copies of
the agenda will be available free of
charge at the hearing.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
proposed regulations is K. Scott Brown,
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Financial Institutions and Products).
However, other personnel from the IRS
and Treasury Department participated
in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 continues to read in part as
follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.446–3 is amended
by:
1. Revising the entries for the table of
contents in § 1.446–3(a) for paragraphs
(c) and (j).
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57687
2. Revising paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2),
and (c)(3).
3. Adding and reserving paragraph
(c)(5).
4. Adding paragraph (c)(6).
5. Adding two sentences to the end of
paragraph (j).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 1.446–3
Notional principal contracts.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Definitions and scope.
(1) Notional principal contract.
(i) In general.
(ii) Payment defined.
(iii) Included contracts.
(A) Special rule for credit default swaps.
(B) Special rule for nonfunctional currency
notional principal contracts.
(iv) Excluded contracts.
(v) Transactions within section 475.
(vi) Transactions within section 988.
(2) Specified index.
(i) Specified financial index.
(ii) Specified non-financial index.
(3) Notional principal amount.
(4) Special definitions.
(i) Related person and party to the contract.
(ii) Objective financial information.
(iii) Dealer in notional principal contracts.
(5) [Reserved]
(6) Examples.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) Effective/applicability date.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Definitions and scope—(1)
Notional principal contract—(i) In
general. A notional principal contract is
a financial instrument that requires one
party to make two or more payments to
the counterparty at specified intervals
calculated by reference to a specified
index upon a notional principal amount
in exchange for specified consideration
or a promise to pay similar amounts. An
agreement between a taxpayer and a
qualified business unit (as defined in
section 989(a)) of the taxpayer, or among
qualified business units of the same
taxpayer, is not a notional principal
contract because a taxpayer cannot enter
into a contract with itself.
(ii) Payment defined. For purposes of
paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section, a
payment includes an amount that is
fixed on one date and paid or otherwise
taken into account on a later date. Thus,
for example, a contract that provides for
a settlement payment referenced to the
appreciation or depreciation on a
specified number of shares of common
stock, adjusted for actual dividends paid
during the term of the contract, is
treated as a contract with more than one
payment with respect to that leg of the
contract. See Example 2 of this
paragraph (c).
(iii) Included contracts. Notional
principal contracts governed by this
section include contracts commonly
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
WREIER-aviles on DSK29S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
57688
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2011 / Proposed Rules
referred to as interest rate swaps,
currency swaps, basis swaps, interest
rate caps, interest rate floors,
commodity swaps, equity swaps, equity
index swaps, credit default swaps,
weather-related swaps, and similar
agreements that satisfy the requirements
of paragraph (c)(1)(i). A collar is not
itself a notional principal contract, but
a cap and a floor that comprise a collar
may be treated as a single notional
principal contract under paragraph
(f)(2)(v)(C) of this section. A contract
may be a notional principal contract
governed by this section even though
the term of the contract is subject to
termination or extension. Each
confirmation under a master agreement
to enter into an agreement covered by
this section is treated as a separate
notional principal contract (or as more
than one notional principal contract if
the confirmation creates more than one
notional principal contract).
Notwithstanding the rule under
paragraph (c)(3) of this section—
(A) Special rule for credit default
swaps. A credit default swap contract
that permits or requires the delivery of
specified debt instruments in
satisfaction of one leg of the contract is
a notional principal contract if it
otherwise satisfies the requirements of
paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section.
(B) Special rule for nonfunctional
currency notional principal contracts. A
notional principal contract that permits
or requires the delivery of specified
currency in satisfaction of one or both
legs of the contract but that otherwise
qualifies as a nonfunctional currency
notional principal contract under
§ 1.988–1(a)(2)(iii)(B) is a notional
principal contract.
(iv) Excluded contracts. A forward
contract, an option, and a guarantee are
not notional principal contracts. An
instrument or contract that constitutes
indebtedness under general Federal
income tax law is not a notional
principal contract. An option or forward
contract that entitles or obligates a
person to enter into a notional principal
contract is not a notional principal
contract, but payments made under
such an option or forward contract may
be governed by paragraph (g)(3) of this
section.
(v) Transactions within section 475.
To the extent that the rules provided in
paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section are
inconsistent with the rules that apply to
any notional principal contract that is
governed by section 475 and the
regulations thereunder, the rules of
section 475 and the regulations
thereunder govern.
(vi) Transactions within section 988.
To the extent that the rules provided in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 Sep 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
this section are inconsistent with the
rules that apply to any notional
principal contract that is also a section
988 transaction or that is integrated with
other property or debt pursuant to
section 988(d), the rules of section 988
and the regulations thereunder govern.
The rules of § 1.446–3(g)(4) are not
considered to be inconsistent with the
rules of section 988. See § 1.988–
2(e)(3)(iv).
(2) Specified index. A specified index
may be either a specified financial index
or a specified non-financial index.
(i) Specified financial index. A
specified financial index is—
(A) A fixed rate, price, or amount;
(B) A fixed rate, price, or amount
applicable in one or more specified
periods followed by one or more
different fixed rates, prices, or amounts
applicable in other periods;
(C) An index that is based on
objective financial information (as
defined in paragraph (c)(4)(ii) of this
section); and
(D) An interest rate index that is
regularly used in normal lending
transactions between a party to the
contract and unrelated persons.
(ii) Specified non-financial index. A
specified non-financial index is any
objectively determinable information
that—
(A) Is not within the control of any of
the parties to the contract and is not
unique to one of the parties’
circumstances;
(B) Is not financial information; and
(C) Cannot be reasonably expected to
front-load or back-load payments
accruing under the contract.
(3) Notional principal amount. For
purposes of this section, a notional
principal amount is any specified
amount of money or property that, when
multiplied by either a specified
financial index or a specified nonfinancial index, measures a party’s
rights and obligations under the
contract, but is not borrowed, loaned, or
sold between the parties as part of the
contract. The notional principal amount
may vary over the term of the contract,
provided that it is set in advance or
varies based on objective financial
information (as defined in paragraph
(c)(4)(ii) of this section). If a notional
principal contract references a notional
principal amount that varies, or that
references a different notional principal
amount for each party, and a principal
purpose for entering into the contract is
to avoid the application of the rules in
this section, the Commissioner may
recharacterize the contract according to
its substance, including by separating
the contract into a series of notional
principal contracts for purposes of
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
applying the rules of this section or by
treating the contract, in whole or in part,
as a loan.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) [Reserved]
(6) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the application of paragraph
(c) of this section.
Example 1. Forward rate agreement. (i) On
January 1, 2012, A enters into a contract with
unrelated counterparty B under which on
December 31, 2013, A will pay or receive
from B, as the case may be, an amount
determined by subtracting 6% multiplied by
a notional amount of $10 million from 3
month LIBOR on December 31, 2013
multiplied by the same notional amount ((3
month LIBOR × $10,000,000)¥(6% ×
$10,000,000)). The contract provides for no
other payments.
(ii) Because this contract provides for a
single net payment between A and B
determined by interest rates in effect on the
settlement date of the contract, the contract
is not a notional principal contract defined
in § 1.446–3(c)(1)(i).
Example 2. Equity total return contract
with dividend adjustments. (i) On January 1,
2012, A enters into a contract with unrelated
counterparty B under which on December 31,
2013, A will receive from B an amount equal
to the appreciation (if any) on a notional
amount of 1 million shares of XYZ common
stock, plus any dividends or other
distributions that are paid on 1 million
shares of XYZ common stock during the term
of the contract. In return, on December 31,
2013 A will pay B an amount equal to any
depreciation on 1 million shares of XYZ
common stock, and an amount equal to 3
month LIBOR multiplied by the notional
value of 1 million shares of XYZ stock on
January 1, 2012 compounded over the term
of the contract. All payments are netted such
that A and B are only liable for the net
payment due under the contract on December
31, 2013.
(ii) Because both legs of this contract
provide for payments that become fixed
during the term of the contract (the dividend
payments and the LIBOR-based payments),
each leg of the contract is treated as
providing for more than one payment. In
addition, since the indices referenced in the
contract are specified indices described in
paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section, and the 1
million shares of XYZ common stock are a
notional principal amount described in
paragraph (c)(3) of this section, the contract
is a notional principal contract defined in
§ 1.446–3(c)(1)(i).
*
*
*
*
*
(j) Effective/applicability date. * * *
The rules of paragraph (c) of this section
apply to notional principal contracts
entered into on or after the date of
publication of a Treasury decision
adopting these rules as final regulations
in the Federal Register. Section 1.446–
3(c) as contained in 26 CFR part 1
revised April 1, 2011, continues to
apply to notional principal contracts
entered into before the date of
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2011 / Proposed Rules
publication of a Treasury decision
adopting these rules as final regulations
in the Federal Register.
Par. 3. Section 1.512(b)–(1) is
amended by:
1. Revising paragraph (a)(1).
2. Adding two sentences to the end of
paragraph (a)(3).
The revision and addition read as
follows:
§ 1.512(b)–1
Modifications.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Certain Investment Income—(1) In
general. Dividends, interest, payments
with respect to securities loans (as
defined in section 512(a)(5)), annuities,
income from notional principal
contracts (as defined in § 1.446–3(c)),
other substantially similar income from
ordinary and routine investments to the
extent determined by the Commissioner,
and all deductions directly connected
with any of the foregoing items of
income shall be excluded in computing
unrelated business taxable income.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * * The rules of paragraph (a)(1)
of this section apply to notional
principal contracts as defined in
§ 1.446–3(c) that are entered into on or
after the date of publication of a
Treasury decision adopting these rules
as final regulations in the Federal
Register. Section 1.512(b)–1(a)(1) as
contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised April
1, 2011, continues to apply to notional
principal contracts entered into before
the date of publication of a Treasury
decision adopting these rules as final
regulations in the Federal Register.
*
*
*
*
*
Par. 4. Section 1.863–7 is amended
by:
1. Revising the third sentence and
removing the fourth sentence of
paragraph (a)(1).
2. Adding two sentences to the end of
paragraph (a)(2).
The revision and addition read as
follows:
WREIER-aviles on DSK29S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 1.863–7 Allocation of income attributable
to certain notional principal contracts under
section 863(a).
(a) Scope—(1) Introduction. * * *
Notional principal contract income is
income attributable to a notional
principal contract as defined in § 1.446–
3(c). * * *
(2) * * * The rules of this section
apply to notional principal contracts as
defined in § 1.446–3(c) that are entered
into on or after the date of publication
of a Treasury decision adopting these
rules as final regulations in the Federal
Register. Section 1.863–7 as contained
in 26 CFR part 1 revised April 1, 2011,
continues to apply to notional principal
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 Sep 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
contracts entered into before the date of
publication of a Treasury decision
adopting these rules as final regulations
in the Federal Register.
*
*
*
*
*
Par. 5. Section 1.954–2 is amended
by:
1. Revising paragraph (h)(3)(i).
2. Adding paragraph (h)(3)(iii).
The revision and addition read as
follows:
§ 1.954–2 Foreign personal holding
company income.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Notional principal contracts—(i)
In general. Income equivalent to interest
includes income from notional principal
contracts (as defined in § 1.446–3(c))
denominated in the functional currency
of the taxpayer (or a qualified business
unit of the taxpayer, as defined in
section 989(a)), the value of which is
determined solely by reference to
interest rates or interest rate indices, to
the extent that the income from such
transactions accrues on or after August
14, 1989.
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) Effective/applicability date. The
rules of paragraph (h)(3) of this section
apply to notional principal contracts as
defined in § 1.446–3(c) that are entered
into on or after the date of publication
of a Treasury decision adopting these
rules as final regulations in the Federal
Register. Section 1.954–2(h)(3) as
contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised April
1, 2011, continues to apply to notional
principal contracts entered into before
the date of publication of a Treasury
decision adopting these rules as final
regulations in the Federal Register.
*
*
*
*
*
Par. 6. Section 1.988–1 is amended
by:
1. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(B)(2).
2. Adding two sentences to the end of
paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C).
The revision and addition read as
follows:
§ 1.988–1
rules.
Certain definitions and special
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) * * *
(B) * * *
(2) Definition of notional principal
contract. Generally, the term ‘‘notional
principal contract’’ means a contract
defined in § 1.446–3(c). However, a
‘‘notional principal contract’’ shall only
be considered as described in paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(B)(1) of this section if the
underlying property to which the
instrument ultimately relates is money
(for example, functional currency),
nonfunctional currency, or property the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57689
value of which is determined by
reference to an interest rate. Thus, the
term ‘‘notional principal contract’’
includes a currency swap as defined in
§ 1.988–2(e)(2)(ii), but does not include
a swap referenced to a commodity or
equity index.
(C) * * * The rules of this paragraph
(a)(2)(iii) apply to notional principal
contracts as defined in § 1.446–3(c) that
are entered into on or after the date of
publication of a Treasury decision
adopting these rules as final regulations
in the Federal Register. Section 1.988–
1(a)(2)(iii) as contained in 26 CFR part
1 revised April 1, 2011, continues to
apply to notional principal contracts
entered into before the date of
publication of a Treasury decision
adopting these rules as final regulations
in the Federal Register.
*
*
*
*
*
Par. 7. Section 1.1256(b)–1 is added
to read as follows:
§ 1.1256(b)–1
defined.
Section 1256 contract
(a) General rule. A section 1256
contract does not include any contract,
or option on such contract, that is a
notional principal contract as defined in
§ 1.446–3(c). A contract that is defined
as both a notional principal contract in
§ 1.446–3(c) and as a section 1256
contract in section 1256(b)(1) is treated
as a notional principal contract and not
as a section 1256 contract.
(b) Regulated futures contract. A
regulated futures contract is a section
1256 contract only if the contract is a
futures contract—
(1) With respect to which the amount
required to be deposited and the amount
which may be withdrawn depends on a
system of marking to market;
(2) That is traded on or subject to the
rules of a qualified board or exchange;
and
(3) That is not required to be reported
as a swap under the Commodity
Exchange Act.
(c) Effective/applicability date. The
rules of this section apply to contracts
entered into on or after the date the final
regulations are published in the Federal
Register.
Par. 8. Section 1.1256(g)–1 is added to
read as follows:
§ 1.1256(g)–1
defined.
Qualified board or exchange
(a) General rule. A qualified board or
exchange means a national securities
exchange registered with the Securities
Exchange Commission, a domestic
board of trade designated as a contract
market by the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission, or any other
exchange, board of trade, or other
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
57690
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2011 / Proposed Rules
market for which the Secretary
determines in published guidance in the
Federal Register or in the Internal
Revenue Bulletin (see § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)
of this chapter) that such market has
rules adequate to carry out the purposes
of section 1256.
(b) Effective/applicability date. The
rule of this section applies to taxable
years ending on or after the date the
final regulations are published in the
Federal Register.
Steven T. Miller,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2011–23665 Filed 9–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 199
[Docket ID DOD–2011–HA–0059]
RIN 0720–AB52
TRICARE; Elimination of the NonAvailability Statement (NAS)
Requirement for Non-Emergency
Inpatient Mental Health Care
Office of the Secretary,
Department of Defense.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule eliminates
the requirement that states a NAS is
needed for non-emergency inpatient
mental health care in order for a
TRICARE Standard beneficiary’s claim
to be paid.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before November 15, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and/or RIN
number and title, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov . Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 4800 Mark Center Drive,
2nd Floor, East Tower, Suite 02G09,
Alexandria, VA 22350–3100.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general
policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public
is to make these submissions available
for viewing on the Internet at https://
regulations.gov as they are received
without change, including any personal
identifiers or contact information.
WREIER-aviles on DSK29S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 Sep 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
Mr.
Richard Hart, TRICARE Policy and
Operations, TRICARE Management
Activity, 5111 Leesburg Pike, Suite 810,
Falls Church, VA 22041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Introduction and Background
Under TRICARE Prime (as provided
in 32 CFR, section 199.17), the military
medical treatment facility (MTF) has the
right of first refusal for specialty
services requested by a civilian
provider, if the services are available at
the MTF. If a TRICARE Prime
beneficiary living near a MTF is referred
for specialty care by a civilian provider
and the service is available at the MTF,
the MTF may decide to provide the care.
If services are refused by the MTF, the
referral will be allowed with a network
provider. As a result, the issuance of
NAS(s) has been eliminated and are
only required for non-enrolled
beneficiaries who live within the MTF
catchment area for non-emergency
inpatient mental health care. Currently,
the number of NASs issued is negligible
as most mental health admissions are
emergency admissions. Requiring a NAS
for a relative few non-emergency
inpatient mental health admissions is
disproportionate to the cost of
maintaining the systems necessary to
process and coordinate the NAS. This
proposed rule eliminates the
requirement for a NAS for nonemergency inpatient mental health care
in order for the TRICARE Standard
beneficiary’s claim to be paid.
II. Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’; Executive Order
13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review’’; and Public Law
96–354, ‘‘Regulatory Flexibility Act’’
(5 U.S.C. 601)
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
require that a comprehensive regulatory
impact analysis be performed on any
economically significant regulatory
action, defined as one that would result
in an annual effect of $100 million or
more on the national economy or which
would have other substantial impacts.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
requires that each Federal Agency
prepare, and make available for public
comment, a regulatory flexibility
analysis when the agency issues a
regulation which would have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed
rule is not a significant regulatory action
and will not have a significant impact
on a substantial number of small entities
for purposes of the RFA. Thus this
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
proposed rule is not subject to any of
these requirements.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3511)
This rule will not impose additional
information collection requirements on
the public.
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
We have examined the impacts of the
rule under Executive Order 13132 and
it does not have policies that have
federalism implications that would have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, therefore,
consultation with State and local
officials is not required.
Sec. 202, Public Law 104–4, ‘‘Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act’’
This rule does not contain unfunded
mandates. It does not contain a Federal
mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local and tribal
governments, in aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any 1 year.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 199
Claims, Dental health, Health care,
Health insurance, Individuals with
disabilities, Military personnel.
Accordingly, 32 CFR 199.4 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 199—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 199
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 10 U.S.C. chapter
55.
2. Section 199.4 is amended by
removing and reserving paragraph (a)(9)
as follows:
§ 199.4
Basic program benefits.
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(9) [RESERVED]
*
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: August 24, 2011.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011–23766 Filed 9–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 180 (Friday, September 16, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 57684-57690]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23665]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG-111283-11]
RIN 1545-BK22
Swap Exclusion for Section 1256 Contracts
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations that describe
swaps and similar agreements that fall within the meaning of section
1256(b)(2)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). This document also
contains proposed regulations that revise the definition of a notional
principal contract under Sec. 1.446-3 of the Income Tax Regulations.
This document provides a notice of public hearing on these proposed
regulations.
DATES: Written or electronic comments must be received by December 15,
2011. Outlines of topics to be discussed at the public hearing
scheduled for January 19, 2012, must be received by December 14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-111283-11), Room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, POB 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington DC 20044. Submissions may be hand delivered Monday through
Friday, between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-
111283-11), Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. Alternatively, taxpayers may submit
comments electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov/ (IRS-REG-111283-11). The public hearing will be
held in the Auditorium, Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations,
K. Scott Brown (202) 622-7454; concerning submissions of comments, the
hearing, and/or to be placed on the building access list to attend the
hearing, Richard Hurst, (202) 622-7180 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains proposed amendments to the Income Tax
Regulations (26 CFR part 1) under sections 1256 and 446 of the Code.
Section 1256(b)(2)(B) was added to the Code by section 1601 of the
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Pub. L. 111-
203, 1601, 124 Stat. 1376, 2223 (2010)) (the Dodd-Frank Act). Section
1256(b)(2)(B) provides that certain swaps and similar agreements are
not subject to section 1256 of the Code. These proposed regulations
provide guidance on the category of swaps and similar agreements that
are within the scope of section 1256(b)(2)(B). These proposed
regulations also revise the definition
[[Page 57685]]
and scope of a notional principal contract under Sec. 1.446-3 of the
Income Tax Regulations.
Explanation of Provisions
A. Section 1256(b)(2)(B) Language and Legislative History
Section 1256 provides that contracts classified as section 1256
contracts are marked to market and any gain or loss is generally
treated as 60 percent long-term capital gain or loss and 40 percent
short-term capital gain or loss. Section 1256(b)(1) defines the term
``section 1256 contract'' as a regulated futures contract, foreign
currency contract, nonequity option, dealer equity option, and dealer
securities futures contract. With the exception of a foreign currency
contract, a section 1256 contract must be traded on or subject to the
rules of a ``qualified board or exchange'' as defined in section
1256(g)(7).
Section 1601 of the Dodd-Frank Act added section 1256(b)(2)(B),
which excludes swaps and similar agreements from the definition of a
section 1256 contract. Section 1256(b)(2)(B) provides that the term
``section 1256 contract'' shall not include--
any interest rate swap, currency swap, basis swap, interest rate
cap, interest rate floor, commodity swap, equity swap, equity index
swap, credit default swap, or similar agreement.
Congress enacted section 1256(b)(2)(B) to resolve uncertainty under
section 1256 for swap contracts that are traded on regulated exchanges.
The specific uncertainty addressed by the enactment of section
1256(b)(2)(B) was described in the Conference Report:
The title contains a provision to address the recharacterization
of income as a result of increased exchange-trading of derivatives
contracts by clarifying that section 1256 of the Internal Revenue
Code does not apply to certain derivatives contracts transacted on
exchanges.
H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 111-517, at 879 (2010).
Section 1256(b)(2)(B) contemplates that a swap contract, even if
traded on or subject to the rules of a qualified board or exchange,
will not be a section 1256 contract.
B. Scope of Swaps Excluded by Section 1256(b)(2)(B)
1. Notional Principal Contracts and Credit Default Swaps
Congress incorporated into section 1256(b)(2)(B) a list of swaps
that parallels the list of swaps included under the definition of a
notional principal contract in Sec. 1.446-3(c) with the addition of
credit default swaps. The parallel language suggests that Congress was
attempting to harmonize the category of swaps excluded under section
1256(b)(2)(B) with swaps that qualify as notional principal contracts
under Sec. 1.446-3(c), rather than with the contracts defined as
``swaps'' under section 721 of the Dodd-Frank Act. Accordingly, Sec.
1.1256(b)-1(a) of the proposed regulations provides that a section 1256
contract does not include a contract that qualifies as a notional
principal contract as defined in proposed Sec. 1.446-3(c). As
discussed herein, the proposed regulations under Sec. 1.446-3 also
expressly provide that a credit default swap is a notional principal
contract.
2. Option on a Notional Principal Contract
Section 1256(b)(2)(B) raises questions as to whether an option on a
notional principal contract that is traded on a qualified board or
exchange would constitute a ``similar agreement'' or would instead be
treated as a nonequity option under section 1256(g)(3). Since an option
on a notional principal contract is closely connected with the
underlying contract, the Treasury Department and the IRS believe that
such an option should be treated as a similar agreement within the
meaning of section 1256(b)(2)(B). Accordingly, Sec. 1.1256(b)-1(a) of
the proposed regulations also provides that a section 1256 contract
does not include an option on any contract that is a notional principal
contract defined in Sec. 1.446-3(c) of the proposed regulations.
3. Ordering Rule
The proposed regulations provide an ordering rule for a contract
that trades as a futures contract regulated by the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission (CFTC), but that also meets the definition of a
notional principal contract. The Treasury Department and the IRS
believe that such a contract is not a commodity futures contract of the
kind envisioned by Congress when it enacted section 1256. Accordingly,
Sec. 1.1256(b)-1(a) of the proposed regulations provides that section
1256 does not include any contract, or option on such contract, that is
both a section 1256 contract and a notional principal contract as
defined in Sec. 1.446-3(c) of the proposed regulations.
C. Definition of Regulated Futures Contract
Section 1256(g)(1) defines a regulated futures contract as ``a
contract (A) with respect to which the amount required to be deposited
and the amount which may be withdrawn depends on a system of marking to
market, and (B) which is traded on or subject to the rules of a
qualified board or exchange.'' The apparent breadth of section
1256(g)(1) has raised questions in the past as to whether a contract
other than a futures contract can be a regulated futures contract. The
Treasury Department and the IRS have historically limited the scope of
a regulated futures contract to those futures contracts that have the
characteristics of traditional futures contracts. Under the Dodd-Frank
Act, a ``designated contract market'' may trade both futures contracts
and swap contracts, although there will be specific reporting rules for
swap contracts. In order to properly limit section 1256 to futures
contracts that trade on designated contract markets, Sec. 1.1256(b)-
1(b) of the proposed regulations provides that a regulated futures
contract is a section 1256 contract only if the contract is a futures
contract that is not required to be reported as a swap under the
Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1) (the CEA). The reporting provisions
for swaps under the CEA will not be effective until the CFTC has
published final rules implementing such provisions. It is anticipated
that swap reporting rules will be in effect before these regulations
are finalized. If, however, these proposed income tax regulations are
finalized before the swap reporting provisions become effective, the
Treasury Department and the IRS will evaluate whether the provisions of
Sec. 1.1256(b)-1(b) need to be adjusted.
Questions have also been raised as to whether the requirement that
a regulated futures contract be ``traded on or subject to the rules
of'' a qualified board or exchange includes off-exchange transactions
such as an exchange of a futures contract for a cash commodity, or an
exchange of a futures contract for a swap, that are carried out subject
to the rules of a CFTC designated contract market. The phrase ``traded
on or subject to the rules of'' appears to have originated under the
CEA. Section 4(a) of the CEA provides, in part, that it is unlawful to
engage in any transaction in, or in connection with, a commodity
futures contract unless such transaction is conducted on or subject to
the rules of a board of trade which has been designated as a contract
market and such contract is executed or consummated by or through a
contract market. Section 5(d) of the CEA, as amended by section 735 of
the Dodd-Frank Act, provides that the rules of a designated contract
market may authorize, for bona fide business purposes, transfer trades
or office trades,
[[Page 57686]]
or an exchange of (i) Futures in connection with a cash commodity
transaction, (ii) futures for cash commodities, or (iii) futures for
swaps. As such, the Treasury Department and the IRS believe that a
futures contract that results from one of these transactions is a
regulated futures contract under section 1256(g)(1) because the
contract is traded subject to the rules of a designated contract
market.
D. Qualified Board or Exchange
Section 1256(g)(7)(C) provides that a qualified board or exchange
includes any other exchange, board of trade, or other market which the
Secretary determines has rules adequate to carry out the purposes of
section 1256. Section 1.1256(g)-1(a) of the proposed regulations
specifies that such determinations are only made through published
guidance in the Federal Register or in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.
Since section 1256(g)(7) was adopted, the Treasury Department and
the IRS have issued determinations for six entities, all of them
foreign futures exchanges. See Rev. Rul. 2010-3 (2010-1 CB 272 (London
International Financial Futures and Options Exchange)), Rev. Rul. 2009-
24 (2009-2 CB 306 (ICE Futures Canada)), Rev. Rul. 2009-4 (2009-1 CB
408 (Dubai Mercantile Exchange)), Rev. Rul. 2007-26 (2007-1 CB 970 (ICE
Futures)), Rev. Rul. 86-7 (1986-1 CB 295 (The Mercantile Division of
the Montreal Exchange)), and Rev. Rul. 85-72 (1985-1 CB 286
(International Futures Exchange (Bermuda))). The IRS has followed a two
step process for making each of the six qualified board or exchange
determinations under section 1256(g)(7). See Sec.
601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b).
In the first step, the exchange submitted a private letter ruling
to the IRS requesting a determination that the exchange is a qualified
board or exchange within the meaning of section 1256(g)(7)(C). Once the
IRS determined that the exchange had rules sufficient to carry out the
purposes of section 1256, the Treasury Department and the IRS published
a revenue ruling announcing that the named exchange was a qualified
board or exchange. The revenue rulings apply to commodity futures
contracts and futures contract options of the type described under the
CEA that are entered into on the named exchange. The revenue ruling
does not apply to contracts that are entered into on another exchange
that is affiliated with the named exchange.
In determining whether a foreign exchange is a qualified board or
exchange under section 1256(g)(7)(C), the Treasury Department and the
IRS have looked to whether the exchange received a CFTC ``direct
access'' no-action relief letter permitting the exchange to make its
electronic trading and matching system available in the United States,
notwithstanding that the exchange was not designated as a contract
market pursuant to section 5 of the CEA. Section 738 of the Dodd-Frank
Act, however, provides the CFTC with authority to adopt rules and
regulations that require registration of a foreign board of trade that
provides United States participants direct access to the foreign board
of trade's electronic trading system. In formulating these rules and
regulations, the CFTC is directed to consider whether comparable
supervision and regulation exists in the foreign board of trade's home
country. Pursuant to section 738, the CFTC has proposed a registration
system to replace the direct access no-action letter process. Under the
proposed registration system, a foreign board of trade operating
pursuant to an existing direct access no-action relief letter must
apply through a limited application process for an ``Order of
Registration'' which will replace the foreign board of trade's existing
direct access no-action letter. Many of the proposed requirements for
and conditions applied to a foreign board of trade's registration will
be based upon those applicable to the foreign board of trade's
currently granted direct access no-action relief letter.
The IRS has conditioned a foreign exchange's qualified board or
exchange status under section 1256(g)(7)(C) on the exchange continuing
to satisfy all CFTC conditions necessary to retain its direct access
no-action relief letter. Consequently, if the CFTC adopts the proposed
registration system, an exchange that has previously received a
qualified board or exchange determination under section 1256(g)(7)(C)
must obtain a CFTC Order of Registration in order to maintain its
qualified board or exchange status. The IRS will continue to evaluate
the CFTC's rules in this regard to determine if any changes to the
IRS's section 1256(g)(7)(C) guidance process are warranted.
E. Definition and Scope of a Notional Principal Contract
1. Payments Under a Notional Principal Contract
In 1993, the IRS promulgated Sec. 1.446-3(c) which defines a
notional principal contract as a financial instrument that provides for
the payment of amounts by one party to another at specified intervals
calculated by reference to a specified index upon a notional principal
amount in exchange for specified consideration or a promise to pay
similar amounts. Questions have arisen as to the proper interpretation
of this requirement. Sections 1.446-3(c)(1)(i) and (ii) of the proposed
regulations expressly provide that a notional principal contract
requires one party to make two or more payments to a counterparty. For
this purpose, the fixing of an amount is treated as a payment, even if
the actual payment reflecting that amount is to be made at a later
date. Thus, for example, a contract that provides for a settlement
payment referenced to the appreciation or depreciation on a specified
number of shares of common stock, adjusted for actual dividends paid
during the term of the contract, is treated as a contract with more
than one payment with respect to that leg of the contract.
2. Credit Default Swaps
In Notice 2004-52 (2004-2 CB 168), the Treasury Department and the
IRS described four possible characterizations of a credit default swap.
See Sec. 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b). These proposed regulations resolve this
uncertainty by adding credit default swaps to the list of swaps
categorized as notional principal contracts governed by the rules of
Sec. 1.446-3.
3. Weather-Related and Other Non-Financial Index Based Swaps
Since the time that the Sec. 1.446-3 regulations were promulgated,
markets have developed for contracts based on non-financial indices.
Many of these contracts are structured as swaps, and payments are
calculated based on indices such as temperature, precipitation,
snowfall, or frost. For example, payments made under a weather
derivative may be based on heating degree days and cooling degree days.
As a technical matter, a weather-related swap currently is not a
notional principal contract because a weather index does not qualify as
a ``specified index'' under Sec. 1.446-3(c)(2) of the current
regulations, which generally require that such index be a financial
index.
The Treasury Department and the IRS believe that swaps on non-
financial indices should be treated as notional principal contracts.
Accordingly, Sec. 1.446-3(c)(2)(ii) of the proposed regulations
expands a specified index to include non-financial indices that are
comprised of any objectively determinable information that is not
within the control of any of the parties
[[Page 57687]]
to the contract and is not unique to one of the parties' circumstances,
and that cannot be reasonably expected to front-load or back-load
payments accruing under the contract.
4. Excluded Contracts
Section 1.446-3(c)(1)(ii) currently provides that a contract
described in section 1256(b) and a futures contract are not notional
principal contracts. In order to remove the circularity that would
otherwise exist between excluded contracts under Sec. 1.446-
3(c)(1)(ii) and proposed Sec. 1.1256(b)-1, a contract described in
section 1256(b) and a futures contract have been deleted from excluded
contracts under proposed Sec. 1.446-3(c)(1)(iv).
5. Conforming Amendments
The definition of a notional principal contract in Sec. 1.446-3(c)
of the proposed regulations is intended to be the operative definition
for all Federal income tax purposes, except where a different or more
limited definition is specifically prescribed. Thus, the regulations
under sections 512, 863, 954, and 988 have been amended to reference
the definition of a notional principal contract in Sec. 1.446-3(c).
Proposed Effective/Applicability Date
These regulations are proposed to apply to contracts entered into
on or after the date the final regulations are published in the Federal
Register.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice of proposed rulemaking is
not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order
12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It has also
been determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act
(5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these regulations, and because
the regulation does not impose a collection of information on small
entitles, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not
apply. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, this notice of proposed
rulemaking will be submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration for comment on its impact on small
business.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any written comments (a signed original
and eight (8) copies) or electronic comments that are submitted timely
to the IRS. The Treasury Department and IRS invite comments on the
clarity of the proposed rules and how they can be made easier to
understand. All comments will be available at https://www.regulations.gov or upon request.
A public hearing has been scheduled for January 19, 2012, beginning
at 10 a.m. in the Auditorium, Internal Revenue Building, 1111
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. Due to building security
procedures, visitors must enter at the Constitution Avenue entrance. In
addition, all visitors must present photo identification to enter the
building. Because of access restrictions, visitors will not be admitted
beyond the immediate entrance area more than 30 minutes before the
hearing starts. For information about having your name placed on the
building access list to attend the hearing, see the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble.
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3) apply to the hearing. Persons who
wish to present oral comments at the hearing must submit written or
electronic comments by December 15, 2011 and an outline of the topics
to be discussed and the time to be devoted to each topic (a signed
original and eight (8) copies) by December 14, 2011. A period of 10
minutes will be allotted to each person for making comments. An agenda
showing the scheduling of the speakers will be prepared after the
deadline for receiving outlines has passed. Copies of the agenda will
be available free of charge at the hearing.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these proposed regulations is K. Scott
Brown, Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions
and Products). However, other personnel from the IRS and Treasury
Department participated in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.446-3 is amended by:
1. Revising the entries for the table of contents in Sec. 1.446-
3(a) for paragraphs (c) and (j).
2. Revising paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), and (c)(3).
3. Adding and reserving paragraph (c)(5).
4. Adding paragraph (c)(6).
5. Adding two sentences to the end of paragraph (j).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 1.446-3 Notional principal contracts.
* * * * *
(c) Definitions and scope.
(1) Notional principal contract.
(i) In general.
(ii) Payment defined.
(iii) Included contracts.
(A) Special rule for credit default swaps.
(B) Special rule for nonfunctional currency notional principal
contracts.
(iv) Excluded contracts.
(v) Transactions within section 475.
(vi) Transactions within section 988.
(2) Specified index.
(i) Specified financial index.
(ii) Specified non-financial index.
(3) Notional principal amount.
(4) Special definitions.
(i) Related person and party to the contract.
(ii) Objective financial information.
(iii) Dealer in notional principal contracts.
(5) [Reserved]
(6) Examples.
* * * * *
(j) Effective/applicability date.
* * * * *
(c) Definitions and scope--(1) Notional principal contract--(i) In
general. A notional principal contract is a financial instrument that
requires one party to make two or more payments to the counterparty at
specified intervals calculated by reference to a specified index upon a
notional principal amount in exchange for specified consideration or a
promise to pay similar amounts. An agreement between a taxpayer and a
qualified business unit (as defined in section 989(a)) of the taxpayer,
or among qualified business units of the same taxpayer, is not a
notional principal contract because a taxpayer cannot enter into a
contract with itself.
(ii) Payment defined. For purposes of paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this
section, a payment includes an amount that is fixed on one date and
paid or otherwise taken into account on a later date. Thus, for
example, a contract that provides for a settlement payment referenced
to the appreciation or depreciation on a specified number of shares of
common stock, adjusted for actual dividends paid during the term of the
contract, is treated as a contract with more than one payment with
respect to that leg of the contract. See Example 2 of this paragraph
(c).
(iii) Included contracts. Notional principal contracts governed by
this section include contracts commonly
[[Page 57688]]
referred to as interest rate swaps, currency swaps, basis swaps,
interest rate caps, interest rate floors, commodity swaps, equity
swaps, equity index swaps, credit default swaps, weather-related swaps,
and similar agreements that satisfy the requirements of paragraph
(c)(1)(i). A collar is not itself a notional principal contract, but a
cap and a floor that comprise a collar may be treated as a single
notional principal contract under paragraph (f)(2)(v)(C) of this
section. A contract may be a notional principal contract governed by
this section even though the term of the contract is subject to
termination or extension. Each confirmation under a master agreement to
enter into an agreement covered by this section is treated as a
separate notional principal contract (or as more than one notional
principal contract if the confirmation creates more than one notional
principal contract). Notwithstanding the rule under paragraph (c)(3) of
this section--
(A) Special rule for credit default swaps. A credit default swap
contract that permits or requires the delivery of specified debt
instruments in satisfaction of one leg of the contract is a notional
principal contract if it otherwise satisfies the requirements of
paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section.
(B) Special rule for nonfunctional currency notional principal
contracts. A notional principal contract that permits or requires the
delivery of specified currency in satisfaction of one or both legs of
the contract but that otherwise qualifies as a nonfunctional currency
notional principal contract under Sec. 1.988-1(a)(2)(iii)(B) is a
notional principal contract.
(iv) Excluded contracts. A forward contract, an option, and a
guarantee are not notional principal contracts. An instrument or
contract that constitutes indebtedness under general Federal income tax
law is not a notional principal contract. An option or forward contract
that entitles or obligates a person to enter into a notional principal
contract is not a notional principal contract, but payments made under
such an option or forward contract may be governed by paragraph (g)(3)
of this section.
(v) Transactions within section 475. To the extent that the rules
provided in paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section are inconsistent
with the rules that apply to any notional principal contract that is
governed by section 475 and the regulations thereunder, the rules of
section 475 and the regulations thereunder govern.
(vi) Transactions within section 988. To the extent that the rules
provided in this section are inconsistent with the rules that apply to
any notional principal contract that is also a section 988 transaction
or that is integrated with other property or debt pursuant to section
988(d), the rules of section 988 and the regulations thereunder govern.
The rules of Sec. 1.446-3(g)(4) are not considered to be inconsistent
with the rules of section 988. See Sec. 1.988-2(e)(3)(iv).
(2) Specified index. A specified index may be either a specified
financial index or a specified non-financial index.
(i) Specified financial index. A specified financial index is--
(A) A fixed rate, price, or amount;
(B) A fixed rate, price, or amount applicable in one or more
specified periods followed by one or more different fixed rates,
prices, or amounts applicable in other periods;
(C) An index that is based on objective financial information (as
defined in paragraph (c)(4)(ii) of this section); and
(D) An interest rate index that is regularly used in normal lending
transactions between a party to the contract and unrelated persons.
(ii) Specified non-financial index. A specified non-financial index
is any objectively determinable information that--
(A) Is not within the control of any of the parties to the contract
and is not unique to one of the parties' circumstances;
(B) Is not financial information; and
(C) Cannot be reasonably expected to front-load or back-load
payments accruing under the contract.
(3) Notional principal amount. For purposes of this section, a
notional principal amount is any specified amount of money or property
that, when multiplied by either a specified financial index or a
specified non-financial index, measures a party's rights and
obligations under the contract, but is not borrowed, loaned, or sold
between the parties as part of the contract. The notional principal
amount may vary over the term of the contract, provided that it is set
in advance or varies based on objective financial information (as
defined in paragraph (c)(4)(ii) of this section). If a notional
principal contract references a notional principal amount that varies,
or that references a different notional principal amount for each
party, and a principal purpose for entering into the contract is to
avoid the application of the rules in this section, the Commissioner
may recharacterize the contract according to its substance, including
by separating the contract into a series of notional principal
contracts for purposes of applying the rules of this section or by
treating the contract, in whole or in part, as a loan.
* * * * *
(5) [Reserved]
(6) Examples. The following examples illustrate the application of
paragraph (c) of this section.
Example 1. Forward rate agreement. (i) On January 1, 2012, A
enters into a contract with unrelated counterparty B under which on
December 31, 2013, A will pay or receive from B, as the case may be,
an amount determined by subtracting 6% multiplied by a notional
amount of $10 million from 3 month LIBOR on December 31, 2013
multiplied by the same notional amount ((3 month LIBOR x
$10,000,000)-(6% x $10,000,000)). The contract provides for no other
payments.
(ii) Because this contract provides for a single net payment
between A and B determined by interest rates in effect on the
settlement date of the contract, the contract is not a notional
principal contract defined in Sec. 1.446-3(c)(1)(i).
Example 2. Equity total return contract with dividend
adjustments. (i) On January 1, 2012, A enters into a contract with
unrelated counterparty B under which on December 31, 2013, A will
receive from B an amount equal to the appreciation (if any) on a
notional amount of 1 million shares of XYZ common stock, plus any
dividends or other distributions that are paid on 1 million shares
of XYZ common stock during the term of the contract. In return, on
December 31, 2013 A will pay B an amount equal to any depreciation
on 1 million shares of XYZ common stock, and an amount equal to 3
month LIBOR multiplied by the notional value of 1 million shares of
XYZ stock on January 1, 2012 compounded over the term of the
contract. All payments are netted such that A and B are only liable
for the net payment due under the contract on December 31, 2013.
(ii) Because both legs of this contract provide for payments
that become fixed during the term of the contract (the dividend
payments and the LIBOR-based payments), each leg of the contract is
treated as providing for more than one payment. In addition, since
the indices referenced in the contract are specified indices
described in paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section, and the 1 million
shares of XYZ common stock are a notional principal amount described
in paragraph (c)(3) of this section, the contract is a notional
principal contract defined in Sec. 1.446-3(c)(1)(i).
* * * * *
(j) Effective/applicability date. * * * The rules of paragraph (c)
of this section apply to notional principal contracts entered into on
or after the date of publication of a Treasury decision adopting these
rules as final regulations in the Federal Register. Section 1.446-3(c)
as contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised April 1, 2011, continues to apply
to notional principal contracts entered into before the date of
[[Page 57689]]
publication of a Treasury decision adopting these rules as final
regulations in the Federal Register.
Par. 3. Section 1.512(b)-(1) is amended by:
1. Revising paragraph (a)(1).
2. Adding two sentences to the end of paragraph (a)(3).
The revision and addition read as follows:
Sec. 1.512(b)-1 Modifications.
* * * * *
(a) Certain Investment Income--(1) In general. Dividends, interest,
payments with respect to securities loans (as defined in section
512(a)(5)), annuities, income from notional principal contracts (as
defined in Sec. 1.446-3(c)), other substantially similar income from
ordinary and routine investments to the extent determined by the
Commissioner, and all deductions directly connected with any of the
foregoing items of income shall be excluded in computing unrelated
business taxable income.
* * * * *
(3) * * * The rules of paragraph (a)(1) of this section apply to
notional principal contracts as defined in Sec. 1.446-3(c) that are
entered into on or after the date of publication of a Treasury decision
adopting these rules as final regulations in the Federal Register.
Section 1.512(b)-1(a)(1) as contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised April 1,
2011, continues to apply to notional principal contracts entered into
before the date of publication of a Treasury decision adopting these
rules as final regulations in the Federal Register.
* * * * *
Par. 4. Section 1.863-7 is amended by:
1. Revising the third sentence and removing the fourth sentence of
paragraph (a)(1).
2. Adding two sentences to the end of paragraph (a)(2).
The revision and addition read as follows:
Sec. 1.863-7 Allocation of income attributable to certain notional
principal contracts under section 863(a).
(a) Scope--(1) Introduction. * * * Notional principal contract
income is income attributable to a notional principal contract as
defined in Sec. 1.446-3(c). * * *
(2) * * * The rules of this section apply to notional principal
contracts as defined in Sec. 1.446-3(c) that are entered into on or
after the date of publication of a Treasury decision adopting these
rules as final regulations in the Federal Register. Section 1.863-7 as
contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised April 1, 2011, continues to apply to
notional principal contracts entered into before the date of
publication of a Treasury decision adopting these rules as final
regulations in the Federal Register.
* * * * *
Par. 5. Section 1.954-2 is amended by:
1. Revising paragraph (h)(3)(i).
2. Adding paragraph (h)(3)(iii).
The revision and addition read as follows:
Sec. 1.954-2 Foreign personal holding company income.
* * * * *
(3) Notional principal contracts--(i) In general. Income equivalent
to interest includes income from notional principal contracts (as
defined in Sec. 1.446-3(c)) denominated in the functional currency of
the taxpayer (or a qualified business unit of the taxpayer, as defined
in section 989(a)), the value of which is determined solely by
reference to interest rates or interest rate indices, to the extent
that the income from such transactions accrues on or after August 14,
1989.
* * * * *
(iii) Effective/applicability date. The rules of paragraph (h)(3)
of this section apply to notional principal contracts as defined in
Sec. 1.446-3(c) that are entered into on or after the date of
publication of a Treasury decision adopting these rules as final
regulations in the Federal Register. Section 1.954-2(h)(3) as contained
in 26 CFR part 1 revised April 1, 2011, continues to apply to notional
principal contracts entered into before the date of publication of a
Treasury decision adopting these rules as final regulations in the
Federal Register.
* * * * *
Par. 6. Section 1.988-1 is amended by:
1. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(B)(2).
2. Adding two sentences to the end of paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C).
The revision and addition read as follows:
Sec. 1.988-1 Certain definitions and special rules.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) * * *
(B) * * *
(2) Definition of notional principal contract. Generally, the term
``notional principal contract'' means a contract defined in Sec.
1.446-3(c). However, a ``notional principal contract'' shall only be
considered as described in paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(B)(1) of this section
if the underlying property to which the instrument ultimately relates
is money (for example, functional currency), nonfunctional currency, or
property the value of which is determined by reference to an interest
rate. Thus, the term ``notional principal contract'' includes a
currency swap as defined in Sec. 1.988-2(e)(2)(ii), but does not
include a swap referenced to a commodity or equity index.
(C) * * * The rules of this paragraph (a)(2)(iii) apply to notional
principal contracts as defined in Sec. 1.446-3(c) that are entered
into on or after the date of publication of a Treasury decision
adopting these rules as final regulations in the Federal Register.
Section 1.988-1(a)(2)(iii) as contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised April
1, 2011, continues to apply to notional principal contracts entered
into before the date of publication of a Treasury decision adopting
these rules as final regulations in the Federal Register.
* * * * *
Par. 7. Section 1.1256(b)-1 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 1.1256(b)-1 Section 1256 contract defined.
(a) General rule. A section 1256 contract does not include any
contract, or option on such contract, that is a notional principal
contract as defined in Sec. 1.446-3(c). A contract that is defined as
both a notional principal contract in Sec. 1.446-3(c) and as a section
1256 contract in section 1256(b)(1) is treated as a notional principal
contract and not as a section 1256 contract.
(b) Regulated futures contract. A regulated futures contract is a
section 1256 contract only if the contract is a futures contract--
(1) With respect to which the amount required to be deposited and
the amount which may be withdrawn depends on a system of marking to
market;
(2) That is traded on or subject to the rules of a qualified board
or exchange; and
(3) That is not required to be reported as a swap under the
Commodity Exchange Act.
(c) Effective/applicability date. The rules of this section apply
to contracts entered into on or after the date the final regulations
are published in the Federal Register.
Par. 8. Section 1.1256(g)-1 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 1.1256(g)-1 Qualified board or exchange defined.
(a) General rule. A qualified board or exchange means a national
securities exchange registered with the Securities Exchange Commission,
a domestic board of trade designated as a contract market by the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or any other exchange, board of
trade, or other
[[Page 57690]]
market for which the Secretary determines in published guidance in the
Federal Register or in the Internal Revenue Bulletin (see Sec.
601.601(d)(2)(ii) of this chapter) that such market has rules adequate
to carry out the purposes of section 1256.
(b) Effective/applicability date. The rule of this section applies
to taxable years ending on or after the date the final regulations are
published in the Federal Register.
Steven T. Miller,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2011-23665 Filed 9-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P