Approaches to Reducing Sodium Consumption; Establishment of Dockets; Request for Comments, Data, and Information, 57050-57054 [2011-23753]
Download as PDF
57050
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 179 / Thursday, September 15, 2011 / Notices
dissemination functions, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
AHRQ’s estimate of burden (including
hours and costs) of the proposed
collection(s) of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information upon the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and
included in the Agency’s subsequent
request for OMB approval of the
proposed information collection. All
comments will become a matter of
public record.
Dated: Aug 31 2011.
Carolyn M. Cancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2011–23539 Filed 9–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–90–M
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0400]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food Safety and Inspection Service
[Docket No. FSIS–2011–0014]
Approaches to Reducing Sodium
Consumption; Establishment of
Dockets; Request for Comments, Data,
and Information
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS; Food Safety and Inspection
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice; establishment of
dockets; request for comments, data,
and information.
AGENCY:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) and the Food
Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) are
announcing the establishment of
dockets to obtain comments, data, and
evidence relevant to the dietary intake
of sodium as well as current and
emerging approaches designed to
promote sodium reduction. FDA and
FSIS are particularly interested in
research that will help both
organizations understand current and
emerging practices by industry in
sodium reduction in foods; current
consumer understanding of the role of
sodium in hypertension and other
chronic illnesses, sodium consumption
practices; motivation and barriers in
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:07 Sep 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
reducing sodium in their food intakes;
and issues associated with the
development of targets for sodium
reduction in foods to promote reduction
of excess sodium intake. Excess sodium
intake is linked to increased risk of
heart disease and stroke. FDA and FSIS
recognize ongoing efforts by a number of
members of the restaurant and packaged
food industries to reduce sodium and
appreciate the complexities of reducing
sodium in foods. Continued input and
support from industry and other
stakeholders are important to support
further progress on this significant
public health issue.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments and data and
information by November 29, 2011.
ADDRESSES: FDA: Submit electronic
comments and data and information to
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
written comments and data and
information to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All
submissions must include the Agency
name and docket number FDA–2011–
N–0400.
FSIS: Submit electronic comments
and data and information to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments and data and information to
the Docket Clerk, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection
Service, FSIS Docket Room, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Patriots
Plaza 3, Mailstop 3782, Room 163A,
Washington, DC 20250–3700. All
submissions must include the Agency
name and docket number FSIS–2011–
0014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
FDA: Richard E. Bonnette, Center for
Food Safety and Applied Nutrition
(HFS–255), Food and Drug
Administration, 5100 Paint Branch
Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740–3835,
240–402–1235.
FSIS: Rosalyn Murphy-Jenkins,
Director, Labeling and Program Delivery
Division, Office of Policy and Program
Development, Food Safety and
Inspection Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, USDA, FSIS, OPPD, LPDD
Stop Code 3784, Patriots Plaza III, 8–
161A, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–3700.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Research shows that excess sodium
consumption is a contributory factor in
the development of hypertension, which
is a leading cause of heart disease and
stroke (Ref. 1), the first and fourth
leading causes of death in the United
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
States, respectively (Ref. 2). Research
also shows that the increase in blood
pressure seen with aging, common to
most Western countries, is not observed
in populations that consume low
sodium diets (Refs. 3 and 4) and that the
U.S. population consumes far more
sodium than recommended (Ref. 5 and
7). Moreover, dietary reduction of
sodium can lower blood pressure as has
been demonstrated in the Dietary
Approaches to Stop Hypertension
(DASH)-Sodium trial (Ref. 6). Because
over three-quarters of sodium in the diet
of the U.S. population is added during
manufacturing of foods and preparation
of restaurant foods, reduction in sodium
consumption in the United States
involves reduction in the sodium
content of food in the U.S. marketplace
(Refs. 5 and 7).
In this document, we refer primarily
to ‘‘sodium,’’ a component of sodium
chloride, commonly known as ‘‘salt.’’
Most but not all sodium is added to food
in the form of salt and we are interested
in all sources of sodium added to foods.
The comments, data, and evidence
regarding sodium reduction obtained by
the establishment of these dockets will
provide important information about
current and emerging practices and
approaches designed to reduce excess
sodium intake, primarily coming from
salt.
A. Sodium: Current and Recommended
Intake
According to national food survey
data from the ‘‘What We Eat in America,
National Health and Nutrition
Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007–
2008,’’ estimated average sodium intake
from foods among persons in the United
States aged 2 years or older is
approximately 3,300 milligrams per day
(mg/d) (excluding salt added at the
table) (Ref. 8). Most of this sodium
comes from salt used in the manufacture
or preparation of foods (Ref. 9). In 2005,
the IOM set a Tolerable Upper Intake
Level (UL) for sodium at 2,300 mg/d and
an Adequate Intake (AI) at 1,500 mg/d
for those 9 to 50 years of age, including
pregnant and lactating women (AIs are
lower for those 0–8 years of age and for
those over 50 years of age) (Ref. 1). The
2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans
recommendations are to ‘‘reduce daily
sodium intake to less than 2,300
milligrams (mg) and further reduce
intake to 1,500 mg among persons who
are 51 and older and those of any age
who are African American or have
hypertension, diabetes, or chronic
kidney disease.’’ The 1,500 mg
recommendation applies to about half of
the U.S. population (Ref. 7). Current
sodium intake is substantially higher
E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM
15SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 179 / Thursday, September 15, 2011 / Notices
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
than what has been recommended by
scientific and public health agencies
and organizations in recent years. The
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) reported in 2010 that
over 80 percent of adults (≥20 years)
recommended to consume less than
2,300 mg/d of sodium in fact consumed
more than 2,300 mg/d (Ref. 10).
The 2010 Dietary Guidelines for
Americans also stated that ‘‘Given the
current U.S. marketplace and the
resulting excessive high sodium intake,
it is challenging to meet even the less
than 2,300 mg recommendation’’ and
that a concerted effort is needed to
reduce sodium in foods to help
consumers meet the levels
recommended (Ref. 7).
An analysis of the potential savings
from reduced sodium consumption in
the U.S. adult population found that
reducing average dietary sodium intake
to 2,300 mg/d among adults 18 years or
older could have substantial health and
financial benefits. Estimates showed
potential reduction of 11 million
hypertension cases and an annual
savings of $18 billion health care costs
(Ref. 11). Another assessment on the
cost-effectiveness of reducing sodium
intake found that an intervention
achieving a reduction of 1,200 mg/d
would save $10 to $24 billion in health
care costs annually, comparable to
benefits of population-wide reductions
in tobacco use, obesity, and cholesterol
levels (Ref. 12). Furthermore, this
analysis found that a modest reduction
over 10 years of about 400 mg sodium/
d would be more cost-effective than
using medications to lower blood
pressure in all persons with
hypertension (Ref. 12).
B. Public and Industry Initiatives to
Reduce Sodium Intake
Since 1980, the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) and the U.S.
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) have made
recommendations in the Dietary
Guidelines for Americans, including
‘‘avoid too much sodium,’’ ‘‘use salt and
sodium only in moderation,’’ and
‘‘choose and prepare foods with less
salt’’ (Refs. 7 and 13 through 17).
FDA has supported these
recommendations with a variety of
initiatives designed to promote
informed choices on the part of
consumers. In 1984, FDA required that
information on sodium be included on
the label whenever nutrition
information appeared on food labels (49
FR 15510, April 18, 1984). In 1990,
Congress enacted the Nutrition Labeling
and Education Act (NLEA), which
mandated nutrition labeling of food. In
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:07 Sep 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
response to the NLEA, in 1993 FDA
issued regulations requiring the
declaration of sodium in absolute
amounts and as a percentage of the
Daily Value (58 FR 2206, January 6,
1993). FDA has also established
standards for sodium-related nutrient
content and health claims (e.g., 21 CFR
101.13; 21 CFR 101.14; 21 CFR 101.61;
21 CFR 101.74). Furthermore, under
section 403(q)(5)(H)(ii)(III) of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act,
as amended by the Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act of 2010, certain
restaurants and similar retail food
establishments must provide, upon
request, written nutrition information,
which includes sodium content, for
standard menu items. Additional efforts
by FDA have included consumer
education initiatives such as a joint
sodium education initiative in 1981
with the National Heart, Lung, and
Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National
Institutes of Health (NIH) as part of the
National High Blood Pressure Education
Program (Ref. 18), and a November 29,
2007, public hearing concerning
policies regarding salt and sodium in
food (72 FR 59973, October 23, 2007).
At the hearing, there was general
agreement that the levels of sodium in
food are too high, but there was no
consensus regarding approaches for
reducing the levels of sodium in food
(Ref. 19).
FSIS, the agency responsible for
nutrition labeling requirements for meat
and poultry products, also coordinates
and collaborates with FDA on nutrition
labeling issues. In 1993, FSIS issued
regulations establishing nutrition
labeling requirements for meat and
poultry products (9 CFR 317, part 381,
subpart Y). These regulations, similar to
FDA’s nutrition labeling regulations,
required the declaration of sodium in
absolute amounts and as a percentage of
the Daily Value on the labeling of
nonexempted meat and poultry
products. In December 2010, FSIS
issued regulations to ensure nutrition
labeling of the major cuts of singleingredient, raw meat and poultry
products on labels or at point-ofpurchase, unless an exemption applies
(75 FR 82148, December 29, 2010).
These regulations also require nutrition
labels on all ground or chopped meat
and poultry products, with or without
added seasonings, unless an exemption
applies. Thus, these regulations increase
the type of meat and poultry products
that must declare sodium in absolute
amounts and as a percentage of the
Daily Value in their labeling.
Other U.S. public health agencies and
organizations have also sought to inform
consumers and encourage reduced
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57051
sodium intake. In addition to conveying
the benefits of reducing sodium related
to hypertension through professional
and consumer education activities, the
NHLBI published guidelines
recommending a sodium intake of no
more than 2,400 mg/d dating back to
1993 (Refs. 20 through 26). More
recently, the CDC has provided funding
to various states and communities
across the country in support of sodium
reduction efforts to help create healthier
food environments and reduce sodium
intake by the population (Ref. 27). In
addition, USDA, through the nutrition
programs of the Center for Nutrition
Policy and Promotion, promotes
consumer messages related to sodium
reductions via the interactive, webbased dietary assessment and weight
management resources at
ChooseMyPlate.gov, as well as through
its MyPlate 2010 Dietary Guidelines for
Americans consumer communications
initiative and Consumer Brochure.
In 2008, the New York City
Department of Health and Mental
Hygiene initiated the National Sodium
Reduction Initiative (NSRI), a
partnership of 70 local and state health
departments and health organizations,
which has set targets to reduce sodium
in restaurant and processed foods (Ref.
28). The goal of NSRI is to decrease
average sodium intake by 20 percent
over 5 years (2009 through 2014) by
developing stepwise reductions from
2009 base levels to those desired by
2014. To-date, 28 companies have
responded to NSRI, committing to
reductions in the sodium content of
some of their products.
These initiatives have been
accompanied by efforts by industry,
where a number of companies have
played, and continue to play, a
leadership role. Many food companies
recognize that reduction of sodium in
the American diet is an important
public health issue. Some major food
manufacturers have publicly committed
to reducing the sodium content of their
products over time. Certain companies
have voluntarily identified specific
product goals for sodium reduction.
Many have demonstrated that
substantial reductions in sodium can be
achieved in certain food products and
have established research programs to
address key issues such as taste
preference, technological advances,
safety, and consumer acceptance in
working through challenges and gaps in
knowledge.
Other countries are also engaged in
sodium reduction activities (Refs. 29
and 30).
E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM
15SEN1
57052
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 179 / Thursday, September 15, 2011 / Notices
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
C. Institute of Medicine of the National
Academies—Report on Strategies To
Reduce Sodium
In April 2010, the IOM released a
report entitled ‘‘Strategies to Reduce
Sodium Intake in the United States.’’
The report concluded that sodium
intake, with the greatest contribution
from salt, remains well above
recommended levels despite several
decades of education, labeling, and
outreach efforts to reduce sodium
consumption in the United States (Ref.
5). In the report, the committee
considered past and current sodium
reduction initiatives, consumer
preference, the functional roles of
sodium in food, research needs,
regulatory options, and nutrition
labeling in developing its
recommendations. The IOM report
acknowledged a number of complicating
factors in reducing sodium in food.
Although sodium primarily plays a role
in altering taste, the IOM report noted
that sodium chloride and other sodiumcontaining ingredients play a critical
role in food safety by reducing the
growth of pathogens thereby improving
safety and shelf-life. In addition, these
compounds provide functional and
physical properties such as improving
texture, controlling stickiness, and
improving meltability. Among other
things, the IOM report noted that more
research is needed to develop and
implement new technologies for sodium
reduction and discussed the role of
voluntary action by industry.
D. Sources and Function of Sodium in
the Typical Diet
According to data presented to the
IOM committee during the March 2009
public information gathering workshop
(see Appendix L of the IOM Sodium
Report), approximately 75 percent of the
total sodium intake for most individuals
is attributed to salt added as an
ingredient or processing aid to
processed and restaurant foods (Ref. 5).
Sodium in the form of salt is added to
food for many reasons. For example, salt
functions as a seasoning agent and
flavor-enhancer, a preservative and
curing agent, a formulating and
processing aid, and a dough conditioner
(Ref. 5). Salt added at the table and in
cooking provides only a small
proportion of the total sodium that
Americans consume (Ref. 9). A number
of other sodium-containing ingredients
contribute to sodium intake in lesser
amounts (<1 percent) (Ref. 31). Some
examples include sodium alginate,
which alters viscosity; sodium
phosphates, which bind liquid to reduce
purge, in particular for solution-
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:07 Sep 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
enhanced meat and poultry products;
sodium sulfite, sodium nitrite, and
sodium benzoate, which preserve food
and inhibit microbial growth; and
sodium lactate, diacetate, and acetate,
which are dual purpose for flavoring
and antimicrobial (pathogen reduction)
purposes (Ref. 32). Non-sodium forms of
these ingredients, which replace sodium
with compounds such as potassium,
calcium, and magnesium, are also
available for some of these applications
(Ref. 31).
According to the National Cancer
Institute (NCI), individual and mixed
foods contributing the highest
proportion of sodium to the U.S. diet
include yeast breads (250 mg/d),
chicken and chicken mixed dishes (233
mg/d), pizza (217 mg/d), pasta and pasta
dishes (174 mg/d), and cold cuts (155
mg/d) (Ref. 33). The CDC reported that
close to 40 percent of daily sodium
intake comes from grain-based products,
such as breads, cakes, cookies, and
crackers, and that almost 30 percent
comes from processed meat products,
such as bacon, sausage, lunch meat,
poultry, and fish mixtures (Ref. 10).
Sodium occurs naturally in nearly all
foods; however this intrinsic sodium is
not a significant dietary contributor for
most Americans. Essentially, any singleingredient food is low in sodium.
E. Sodium Reduction Opportunities
FDA and FSIS are considering
potential ways to promote gradual,
achievable and sustainable reduction of
sodium intake over time. Research on a
variety of issues, including the
development of possible targets for the
reduction of the sodium content of
foods, is needed to assist FDA and FSIS
in this effort. Sodium-containing food
ingredients are used for multiple
purposes at variable levels in diverse
foods. The sodium intake of the U.S.
population reflects both the sodium
levels of individual foods and the
amounts of foods consumed. As such,
there are a variety of factors that may
inform judgments about appropriate
opportunities for sodium reduction.
These factors include:
1. The important role that sodium has
in food safety with respect to limiting
microbial growth and maintaining the
shelf-life of some foods;
2. The effect of sodium reduction on
the physical attributes (e.g., consistency,
texture, shape, form) of some foods in
ways that may impact consumer
acceptance or food processing and
manufacturing practices;
3. The feasibility, practicality, and
cost of reducing sodium in various food
categories;
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4. The magnitude (time and percent
sodium reduction) of any gradual or
stepwise reduction effort;
5. The need to act gradually in a
manner that is acceptable to consumers,
while also achieving significant sodium
reduction, because taste preference for
sodium is acquired and can be modified
(Refs. 34 and 35).
II. Establishment of a Docket and
Request for Specific Input on Certain
Topics
FDA and FSIS are establishing
dockets to provide an opportunity for
interested persons to submit comments,
research, data, and other information
that will better inform them about
current and emerging practices by the
private sector in sodium reduction;
current consumer understanding of the
role of sodium in hypertension and
other chronic illnesses; sodium
consumption practices; motivation and
barriers in reducing sodium in their
food intakes; and issues associated with
the development of targets for sodium
reduction in foods to promote reduction
in excess sodium intake. In particular,
both agencies welcome input on the
following matters:
1. Comments and research related to
recent sodium reduction initiatives by
industry and the effects of those
initiatives;
2. Comments and research related to
consumer understanding of the role of
sodium in hypertension and other
chronic illnesses, sodium consumption
practices, and motivation and barriers in
reducing sodium in their food intakes;
3. Comments and research related to
effective strategies for sustainable and
meaningful reduction of sodium in
foods sold in packaged or prepared form
across the food supply, including and in
particular foods with a high sales
volume;
4. Comments and research related to
existing or potential positive incentives
for innovation in reformulating
packaged and restaurant foods to reduce
added sodium;
5. Comments and research related to
the recommendations from the April
2010 IOM Sodium report on ‘‘Strategies
to Reduce Sodium Intake in the United
States,’’ including research related to
information gaps identified in the IOM
report (taste preferences for sodium,
technological role of sodium/salt, role of
food matrix, food safety, etc.);
6. Comments and research related to
the following: (a) Methods for
establishing sodium reduction targets,
including information on general target
design (e.g., setting sodium reduction
targets based on food categories, serving
size, or formulations), (b) step-wise
E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM
15SEN1
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 179 / Thursday, September 15, 2011 / Notices
approaches to achieve sustainable
sodium reductions and timeframes for
achieving such reductions, and (c)
methods for evaluating the impact of a
sodium reduction strategy;
7. Comments and research related to
avoiding potential unintended
consequences for food safety, nutrition
(including effects on added sugars or
solid fats), or food manufacturing
technologies that could result from
interventions to reduce sodium;
8. Comments and research related to
existing voluntary sodium reduction
efforts, including the voluntary sodium
reduction targets set by the New York
City-initiated NSRI partnership, and
their applicability to a potentential
federal sodium reduction initiative;
9. Comments and research related to
food formulation, processing,
production, and other technology that
could lead to meaningful and
sustainable reductions in the amount of
sodium in food, including specific food
categories, targets, and methods to
monitor;
10. Comments and research on the
role that food standards of identity play
in promoting or limiting the feasibility
of sodium reduction of foods (among
other things, standards of identity for
certain foods define the nature of those
foods, generally in terms of how those
foods are prepared, the types of
ingredients that they must contain (i.e.,
mandatory ingredients) and that they
may contain (i.e., optional ingredients),
and how those foods must be labeled
(Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(21 U.S.C. 341); the Federal Meat
Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 607(c)); and
the Poultry Products Inspection Act (21
U.S.C. 457(b)));
11. Comments and research on any
advantages of sodium to consumers,
including but not limited to, food safety,
nutrition, and palatability;
12. Comments and research on the
economic impacts of reducing sodium,
including but not limited to, the cost of
food, agricultural production, small
businesses, jobs, and the health care
system;
13. Comments and research on the
impact of sodium reduction initiatives
on consumer food choices and
compliance with 2010 Dietary
Guidelines for Americans
recommendations;
14. Comments and research related to
how consumers respond to sodium
reductions (i.e., adding back salt to
foods, consumption of reformulated
products); and
15. Comments and research related to
effective methods for communicating to
the public the health benefits associated
with the sodium intake levels
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:38 Sep 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
recommended by the 2010 Dietary
Guidelines for Americans.
We anticipate that some interested
persons may wish to provide FDA and
FSIS with certain comments, research,
data, and information that they consider
to be trade secret or confidential
commercial information (CCI) that
would be exempt under Exemption 4 of
the Freedom of Information Act (5
U.S.C. 552). You may claim information
that you submit to FDA and FSIS as CCI
or trade secret by clearly marking both
the document and the specific
information as ‘‘confidential.’’
Information so marked will not be
disclosed except in accordance with the
Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C.
552) and the specific agency’s
disclosure regulations (FDA’s
regulations under 21 CFR part 20; FSIS’s
regulations under 9 CFR part 390). For
electronic submissions to https://
www.regulations.gov, indicate in the
‘‘comments’’ box of the appropriate
docket that your submission contains
confidential information. You must also
submit a copy of the comment that does
not contain the information claimed as
confidential for inclusion in the public
version of the official record.
Information not marked confidential
will be included in the public version
of the official record without prior
notice.
III. Public Meeting
A Federal Register notice will be
published in the near future announcing
a public meeting to discuss the topics
set forth in this notice.
IV. Comments
FDA: Interested persons may submit
to FDA’s Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) either
electronic or written comments
regarding this document. It is only
necessary to send one set of comments.
It is no longer necessary to send two
copies of mailed comments. Identify
comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this
document. Received comments may be
seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
FSIS: Interested persons may submit
to FSIS’s Docket Clerk (see ADDRESSES)
either electronic or written comments
regarding this document. Identify
comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this
document. Received comments may be
seen in the FSIS Docket Room between
8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
Because two docket numbers are
associated with this document, please
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57053
include with your comments the docket
number that corresponds with the
appropriate agency. Comments
submitted for inclusion in both dockets
should be separately submitted to each
identified docket number to ensure
consideration.
V. References
FDA has placed the following
references on display in FDA’s Division
of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES). You may see them between
9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday. (FDA has verified the Web site
addresses, but FDA is not responsible
for any subsequent changes to Web sites
after this document publishes in the
Federal Register.)
1. IOM (2005). ‘‘Dietary Reference Intakes for
Water, Potassium, Sodium Chloride and
Sulfate,’’ Washington DC: The National
Academies Press.
2. Xu, J, Kochanek, KD, Murphy, SL, TejadaVera, B. ‘‘Deaths: preliminary data for
2007,’’ CDC, National Vital Statistics
Report. 2011; 58 (19).
3. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR,
Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al.
‘‘The seventh report of the Joint National
Committee on Prevention, Detection,
Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood
Pressure,’’ Hypertension. 2003; 42: 1206–
1252.
4. Carvalho JJ, Baruzzi RG, Howard PF,
Poulter N, Alpers MP, Franco LJ, et al.
‘‘Blood pressure in four remote
populations in the INTERSALT Study,’’
Hypertension. 1989 Sep; 14(3): 238–246.
5. IOM (2010). ‘‘Strategies to Reduce Sodium
Intake in the United States,’’ Washington
DC: The National Academies Press.
6. Sacks FM, Svetkey LP, Vollmer WM,
Appel LJ, Bray GA, Harsha D, et al.
‘‘Effects on blood pressure of reduced
dietary sodium and the Dietary
Approaches to Stop Hypertension
(DASH) diet.’’ DASH–Sodium
Collaborative Research Group. New
England Journal of Medicine. 2001 Jan 4;
344(1): 3–10.
7. USDA/HHS (2010). ‘‘Dietary Guidelines for
Americans, 2010, 7th Edition,’’
Washington, DC: U.S. Government
Printing Office, December 2010.
8. USDA, Agricultural Research Service.
‘‘What we eat in America, NHANES.’’
Available at https://www.ars.usda.gov/
Services/docs.htm?docid=13793.
Accessed on August 30, 2010.
9. Mattes RD, Donnelly D. ‘‘Relative
contributions of dietary sodium
sources,’’ Journal of the American
College of Nutrition. 1991 Aug; 10(4):
383–93.
10. ‘‘Sodium Intake Among Adults—United
States, 2005–2006,’’ CDC, Morbidity and
Mortality Weekly Report. June 25, 2010;
59 (24): 746–749.
11. Palar K, Sturm R. ‘‘Potential societal
savings from reduced sodium
consumption in the U.S. adult
population.’’ American Journal of Health
Promotion. 2009 Sep-Oct; 24(1): 49–57.
E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM
15SEN1
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
57054
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 179 / Thursday, September 15, 2011 / Notices
12. Bibbins-Domingo K, Chertow GM, Coxson
PG, Moran A, Lightwood JM, Pletcher
MJ, Goldman L. ‘‘Projected Effect of
Dietary Salt Reductions on Future
Cardiovascular Disease.’’ New England
Journal of Medicine. 2010 Feb 18; 362
(7): 590–599.
13. USDA/HHS (1980). ‘‘Dietary Guidelines
for Americans, 1st Edition.’’ Washington,
DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
14. USDA/HHS (1985). ‘‘Dietary Guidelines
for Americans, 2nd Edition.’’
Washington, DC: U.S. Government
Printing Office.
15. USDA/HHS (1990). ‘‘Dietary Guidelines
for Americans, 3rd Edition.’’
Washington, DC: U.S. Government
Printing Office.
16. USDA/HHS (2000). ‘‘Dietary Guidelines
for Americans, 5th Edition.’’
Washington, DC: U.S. Government
Printing Office.
17. USDA/HHS (2005). ‘‘Dietary Guidelines
for Americans, 6th Edition.’’
Washington, DC: U.S. Government
Printing Office.
18. Derby, BM and Fein, SB (1995). ‘‘Meeting
the NLEA education challenge: A
consumer research perspective.’’ In
Nutrition Labeling Handbook, edited by
R. Shapiro. New York: M. Dekker: 315–
353.
19. FDA. 2007. ‘‘Public Hearing—Regulatory
Hearing on Salt and Sodium—
Transcript, November 29, 2007.’’
Available at https://www.regulations.gov/
search/Regs/
home.html#docketDetail?R=FDA–2007–
0545. Accessed on November 19, 2010.
20. Whelton PK., Adams-Campbell LL, Appel
LJ, Cutler J, Donato K, Elmer PJ, et al.
‘‘National High Blood Pressure
Education Program Working Group
report on primary prevention of
hypertension,’’ Archives of Internal
Medicine. 1993; 153(2): 186–208.
21. NHLBI (1996). ‘‘Implementing
recommendations for dietary salt
reduction: Where are we? Where are we
going? How do we get there? Summary
of an NHLBI workshop,’’ NIH
Publication No. 55–728N. Bethesda, MD:
National Institutes of Health.
22. NHLBI (1997). ‘‘The sixth report of the
Joint National Committee on Prevention,
Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of
High Blood Pressure,’’ NIH Publication
No. 98–4080. Bethesda, MD: National
Institutes of Health.
23. NHLBI (1999). ‘‘Statement from the
National High Blood Pressure Education
Program Coordinating Committee,’’
https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/prof/
heart/hbp/salt_upd.pdf. Accessed on
April 12, 2010.
24. NHLBI (2002). ‘‘Primary prevention of
hypertension: Clinical and public health
advisory from the National High Blood
Pressure Education Program,’’ NIH
Publication No. 02–5076. Bethesda, MD:
National Heart, Lung, and Blood
Institute.
25. NHLBI (2004). ‘‘The seventh report of the
Joint National Committee on prevention,
detection, evaluation, and the treatment
of high blood pressure,’’ NIH Publication
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:07 Sep 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
No. 04–5230. Bethesda, MD: National
Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
26. NHLBI (2010). ‘‘National high blood
pressure education program.’’ Available
at https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/hbp/
prevent/sodium/sodium.htm. Accessed
on August 30, 2010.
27. CDC (2010), ‘‘CDC Awards $1.9 Million
for State and Local Sodium Reduction
Initiatives.’’ Available at https://
www.cdc.gov/media/pressrel/2010/
r101001.html. Accessed on August 30,
2010.
28. New York City Department of Health and
Mental Hygiene (2009). ‘‘NYC Starts a
Nationwide Initiative to Cut the Salt in
Restaurants and Processed Food.’’
Available at https://www.nyc.gov/html/
doh/html/cardio/cardio-saltinitiative.shtml. Accessed on August 30,
2010.
29. United Kingdom Food Standards Agency
(2010). ‘‘World talks on salt reduction in
food.’’ Available at https://
www.food.gov.uk/news/newsarchive/
2010/jun/saltmtg. Accessed on August
30, 2010.
30. Health Canada (2010). ‘‘Sodium
Reduction Strategy for Canada,
Recommendations of the Sodium
Working Group.’’ Available at https://
www.hc-sc.gc.ca/
fn-an/nutrition/sodium/strateg/indexeng.php. Accessed on August 30, 2010.
31. Doyle, ME (2008). ‘‘Sodium reduction
and its effects on food safety, food
quality and human health.’’ FRI
Briefings. Food Research Institute,
University of Wisconsin.
32. Tarver T. ‘‘Desalting the Food Grid.’’
Food Technology. August 2010; 64(8):
44–50. Available at https://www.ift.org.
Accessed on August 31, 2010.
33. NCI (2010). ‘‘Sources of Sodium Among
the U.S. Population (2005–2006).’’ Risk
Factor Monitoring and Methods Branch
Web site, Applied Research Program,
National Cancer Institute. Available at
https://riskfactor.cancer.gov/diet/
foodsources/sodium/. Updated January
2010. Accessed on August 30, 2010.
34. Bertino M, Beauchamp GK, Engelman K.
‘‘Long-term reduction in dietary sodium
alters the taste of salt,’’ American Journal
of Clinical Nutrition. 1982; 36: 1134–
1144.
35. Blais CA, Pangborn RM, Borhani, NO,
Ferrell MF, Prineas RJ, Laing B. ‘‘Effect
of dietary sodium restriction on taste
responses to sodium chloride: A
longitudinal study,’’ American Journal of
Clinical Nutrition. 1986; 44: 232–243.
Dated: September 12, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy,
Food and Drug Administration.
Dated: September 12, 2011.
Alfred V. Almanza,
Administrator, Food Safety and Inspection
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–23753 Filed 9–13–11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2010–D–0163]
International Cooperation on
Harmonisation of Technical
Requirements for Registration of
Veterinary Medicinal Products;
Guidance for Industry on Studies To
Evaluate the Metabolism and Residue
Kinetics of Veterinary Drugs in FoodProducing Animals: Metabolism Study
To Determine the Quantity and Identify
the Nature of Residues; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a guidance for industry
(#205) entitled ‘‘Guidance for Industry
on Studies To Evaluate the Metabolism
and Residue Kinetics of Veterinary
Drugs in Food-Producing Animals:
Metabolism Study To Determine the
Quantity and Identify the Nature of
Residues (MRK),’’ (VICH GL46). This
guidance has been developed for
veterinary use by the International
Cooperation on Harmonisation of
Technical Requirements for Registration
of Veterinary Medicinal Products
(VICH). This VICH guidance document
is intended to provide recommendations
for internationally harmonized test
procedures to study the quantity and
nature of residues of veterinary drugs in
food-producing animals.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments on Agency guidances
at any time.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for
single copies of the guidance to the
Communications Staff (HFV–12), Center
for Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug
Administration, 7519 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855. Send one selfaddressed adhesive label to assist that
office in processing your request. See
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for electronic access to the guidance
document.
Submit electronic comments on the
guidance to https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia
Oriani, Center for Veterinary Medicine
(HFV–151), Food and Drug
Administration, 7500 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 240–276–8204,
julia.oriani@fda.hhs.gov.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM
15SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 179 (Thursday, September 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57050-57054]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23753]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0400]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food Safety and Inspection Service
[Docket No. FSIS-2011-0014]
Approaches to Reducing Sodium Consumption; Establishment of
Dockets; Request for Comments, Data, and Information
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS; Food Safety and Inspection
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice; establishment of dockets; request for comments, data,
and information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Food Safety and
Inspection Service (FSIS) are announcing the establishment of dockets
to obtain comments, data, and evidence relevant to the dietary intake
of sodium as well as current and emerging approaches designed to
promote sodium reduction. FDA and FSIS are particularly interested in
research that will help both organizations understand current and
emerging practices by industry in sodium reduction in foods; current
consumer understanding of the role of sodium in hypertension and other
chronic illnesses, sodium consumption practices; motivation and
barriers in reducing sodium in their food intakes; and issues
associated with the development of targets for sodium reduction in
foods to promote reduction of excess sodium intake. Excess sodium
intake is linked to increased risk of heart disease and stroke. FDA and
FSIS recognize ongoing efforts by a number of members of the restaurant
and packaged food industries to reduce sodium and appreciate the
complexities of reducing sodium in foods. Continued input and support
from industry and other stakeholders are important to support further
progress on this significant public health issue.
DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments and data and
information by November 29, 2011.
ADDRESSES: FDA: Submit electronic comments and data and information to
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments and data and
information to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
All submissions must include the Agency name and docket number FDA-
2011-N-0400.
FSIS: Submit electronic comments and data and information to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments and data and information
to the Docket Clerk, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and
Inspection Service, FSIS Docket Room, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Patriots Plaza 3, Mailstop 3782, Room 163A, Washington, DC 20250-3700.
All submissions must include the Agency name and docket number FSIS-
2011-0014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA: Richard E. Bonnette, Center for
Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-255), Food and Drug
Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740-3835,
240-402-1235.
FSIS: Rosalyn Murphy-Jenkins, Director, Labeling and Program
Delivery Division, Office of Policy and Program Development, Food
Safety and Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, USDA,
FSIS, OPPD, LPDD Stop Code 3784, Patriots Plaza III, 8-161A, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-3700.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Research shows that excess sodium consumption is a contributory
factor in the development of hypertension, which is a leading cause of
heart disease and stroke (Ref. 1), the first and fourth leading causes
of death in the United States, respectively (Ref. 2). Research also
shows that the increase in blood pressure seen with aging, common to
most Western countries, is not observed in populations that consume low
sodium diets (Refs. 3 and 4) and that the U.S. population consumes far
more sodium than recommended (Ref. 5 and 7). Moreover, dietary
reduction of sodium can lower blood pressure as has been demonstrated
in the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH)-Sodium trial
(Ref. 6). Because over three-quarters of sodium in the diet of the U.S.
population is added during manufacturing of foods and preparation of
restaurant foods, reduction in sodium consumption in the United States
involves reduction in the sodium content of food in the U.S.
marketplace (Refs. 5 and 7).
In this document, we refer primarily to ``sodium,'' a component of
sodium chloride, commonly known as ``salt.'' Most but not all sodium is
added to food in the form of salt and we are interested in all sources
of sodium added to foods. The comments, data, and evidence regarding
sodium reduction obtained by the establishment of these dockets will
provide important information about current and emerging practices and
approaches designed to reduce excess sodium intake, primarily coming
from salt.
A. Sodium: Current and Recommended Intake
According to national food survey data from the ``What We Eat in
America, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)
2007-2008,'' estimated average sodium intake from foods among persons
in the United States aged 2 years or older is approximately 3,300
milligrams per day (mg/d) (excluding salt added at the table) (Ref. 8).
Most of this sodium comes from salt used in the manufacture or
preparation of foods (Ref. 9). In 2005, the IOM set a Tolerable Upper
Intake Level (UL) for sodium at 2,300 mg/d and an Adequate Intake (AI)
at 1,500 mg/d for those 9 to 50 years of age, including pregnant and
lactating women (AIs are lower for those 0-8 years of age and for those
over 50 years of age) (Ref. 1). The 2010 Dietary Guidelines for
Americans recommendations are to ``reduce daily sodium intake to less
than 2,300 milligrams (mg) and further reduce intake to 1,500 mg among
persons who are 51 and older and those of any age who are African
American or have hypertension, diabetes, or chronic kidney disease.''
The 1,500 mg recommendation applies to about half of the U.S.
population (Ref. 7). Current sodium intake is substantially higher
[[Page 57051]]
than what has been recommended by scientific and public health agencies
and organizations in recent years. The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) reported in 2010 that over 80 percent of adults (>=20
years) recommended to consume less than 2,300 mg/d of sodium in fact
consumed more than 2,300 mg/d (Ref. 10).
The 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans also stated that ``Given
the current U.S. marketplace and the resulting excessive high sodium
intake, it is challenging to meet even the less than 2,300 mg
recommendation'' and that a concerted effort is needed to reduce sodium
in foods to help consumers meet the levels recommended (Ref. 7).
An analysis of the potential savings from reduced sodium
consumption in the U.S. adult population found that reducing average
dietary sodium intake to 2,300 mg/d among adults 18 years or older
could have substantial health and financial benefits. Estimates showed
potential reduction of 11 million hypertension cases and an annual
savings of $18 billion health care costs (Ref. 11). Another assessment
on the cost-effectiveness of reducing sodium intake found that an
intervention achieving a reduction of 1,200 mg/d would save $10 to $24
billion in health care costs annually, comparable to benefits of
population-wide reductions in tobacco use, obesity, and cholesterol
levels (Ref. 12). Furthermore, this analysis found that a modest
reduction over 10 years of about 400 mg sodium/d would be more cost-
effective than using medications to lower blood pressure in all persons
with hypertension (Ref. 12).
B. Public and Industry Initiatives to Reduce Sodium Intake
Since 1980, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) have made recommendations
in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, including ``avoid too much
sodium,'' ``use salt and sodium only in moderation,'' and ``choose and
prepare foods with less salt'' (Refs. 7 and 13 through 17).
FDA has supported these recommendations with a variety of
initiatives designed to promote informed choices on the part of
consumers. In 1984, FDA required that information on sodium be included
on the label whenever nutrition information appeared on food labels (49
FR 15510, April 18, 1984). In 1990, Congress enacted the Nutrition
Labeling and Education Act (NLEA), which mandated nutrition labeling of
food. In response to the NLEA, in 1993 FDA issued regulations requiring
the declaration of sodium in absolute amounts and as a percentage of
the Daily Value (58 FR 2206, January 6, 1993). FDA has also established
standards for sodium-related nutrient content and health claims (e.g.,
21 CFR 101.13; 21 CFR 101.14; 21 CFR 101.61; 21 CFR 101.74).
Furthermore, under section 403(q)(5)(H)(ii)(III) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act of 2010, certain restaurants and similar retail
food establishments must provide, upon request, written nutrition
information, which includes sodium content, for standard menu items.
Additional efforts by FDA have included consumer education initiatives
such as a joint sodium education initiative in 1981 with the National
Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of
Health (NIH) as part of the National High Blood Pressure Education
Program (Ref. 18), and a November 29, 2007, public hearing concerning
policies regarding salt and sodium in food (72 FR 59973, October 23,
2007). At the hearing, there was general agreement that the levels of
sodium in food are too high, but there was no consensus regarding
approaches for reducing the levels of sodium in food (Ref. 19).
FSIS, the agency responsible for nutrition labeling requirements
for meat and poultry products, also coordinates and collaborates with
FDA on nutrition labeling issues. In 1993, FSIS issued regulations
establishing nutrition labeling requirements for meat and poultry
products (9 CFR 317, part 381, subpart Y). These regulations, similar
to FDA's nutrition labeling regulations, required the declaration of
sodium in absolute amounts and as a percentage of the Daily Value on
the labeling of nonexempted meat and poultry products. In December
2010, FSIS issued regulations to ensure nutrition labeling of the major
cuts of single-ingredient, raw meat and poultry products on labels or
at point-of-purchase, unless an exemption applies (75 FR 82148,
December 29, 2010). These regulations also require nutrition labels on
all ground or chopped meat and poultry products, with or without added
seasonings, unless an exemption applies. Thus, these regulations
increase the type of meat and poultry products that must declare sodium
in absolute amounts and as a percentage of the Daily Value in their
labeling.
Other U.S. public health agencies and organizations have also
sought to inform consumers and encourage reduced sodium intake. In
addition to conveying the benefits of reducing sodium related to
hypertension through professional and consumer education activities,
the NHLBI published guidelines recommending a sodium intake of no more
than 2,400 mg/d dating back to 1993 (Refs. 20 through 26). More
recently, the CDC has provided funding to various states and
communities across the country in support of sodium reduction efforts
to help create healthier food environments and reduce sodium intake by
the population (Ref. 27). In addition, USDA, through the nutrition
programs of the Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion, promotes
consumer messages related to sodium reductions via the interactive,
web-based dietary assessment and weight management resources at
ChooseMyPlate.gov, as well as through its MyPlate 2010 Dietary
Guidelines for Americans consumer communications initiative and
Consumer Brochure.
In 2008, the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
initiated the National Sodium Reduction Initiative (NSRI), a
partnership of 70 local and state health departments and health
organizations, which has set targets to reduce sodium in restaurant and
processed foods (Ref. 28). The goal of NSRI is to decrease average
sodium intake by 20 percent over 5 years (2009 through 2014) by
developing stepwise reductions from 2009 base levels to those desired
by 2014. To-date, 28 companies have responded to NSRI, committing to
reductions in the sodium content of some of their products.
These initiatives have been accompanied by efforts by industry,
where a number of companies have played, and continue to play, a
leadership role. Many food companies recognize that reduction of sodium
in the American diet is an important public health issue. Some major
food manufacturers have publicly committed to reducing the sodium
content of their products over time. Certain companies have voluntarily
identified specific product goals for sodium reduction. Many have
demonstrated that substantial reductions in sodium can be achieved in
certain food products and have established research programs to address
key issues such as taste preference, technological advances, safety,
and consumer acceptance in working through challenges and gaps in
knowledge.
Other countries are also engaged in sodium reduction activities
(Refs. 29 and 30).
[[Page 57052]]
C. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies--Report on
Strategies To Reduce Sodium
In April 2010, the IOM released a report entitled ``Strategies to
Reduce Sodium Intake in the United States.'' The report concluded that
sodium intake, with the greatest contribution from salt, remains well
above recommended levels despite several decades of education,
labeling, and outreach efforts to reduce sodium consumption in the
United States (Ref. 5). In the report, the committee considered past
and current sodium reduction initiatives, consumer preference, the
functional roles of sodium in food, research needs, regulatory options,
and nutrition labeling in developing its recommendations. The IOM
report acknowledged a number of complicating factors in reducing sodium
in food. Although sodium primarily plays a role in altering taste, the
IOM report noted that sodium chloride and other sodium-containing
ingredients play a critical role in food safety by reducing the growth
of pathogens thereby improving safety and shelf-life. In addition,
these compounds provide functional and physical properties such as
improving texture, controlling stickiness, and improving meltability.
Among other things, the IOM report noted that more research is needed
to develop and implement new technologies for sodium reduction and
discussed the role of voluntary action by industry.
D. Sources and Function of Sodium in the Typical Diet
According to data presented to the IOM committee during the March
2009 public information gathering workshop (see Appendix L of the IOM
Sodium Report), approximately 75 percent of the total sodium intake for
most individuals is attributed to salt added as an ingredient or
processing aid to processed and restaurant foods (Ref. 5). Sodium in
the form of salt is added to food for many reasons. For example, salt
functions as a seasoning agent and flavor-enhancer, a preservative and
curing agent, a formulating and processing aid, and a dough conditioner
(Ref. 5). Salt added at the table and in cooking provides only a small
proportion of the total sodium that Americans consume (Ref. 9). A
number of other sodium-containing ingredients contribute to sodium
intake in lesser amounts (<1 percent) (Ref. 31). Some examples include
sodium alginate, which alters viscosity; sodium phosphates, which bind
liquid to reduce purge, in particular for solution-enhanced meat and
poultry products; sodium sulfite, sodium nitrite, and sodium benzoate,
which preserve food and inhibit microbial growth; and sodium lactate,
diacetate, and acetate, which are dual purpose for flavoring and
antimicrobial (pathogen reduction) purposes (Ref. 32). Non-sodium forms
of these ingredients, which replace sodium with compounds such as
potassium, calcium, and magnesium, are also available for some of these
applications (Ref. 31).
According to the National Cancer Institute (NCI), individual and
mixed foods contributing the highest proportion of sodium to the U.S.
diet include yeast breads (250 mg/d), chicken and chicken mixed dishes
(233 mg/d), pizza (217 mg/d), pasta and pasta dishes (174 mg/d), and
cold cuts (155 mg/d) (Ref. 33). The CDC reported that close to 40
percent of daily sodium intake comes from grain-based products, such as
breads, cakes, cookies, and crackers, and that almost 30 percent comes
from processed meat products, such as bacon, sausage, lunch meat,
poultry, and fish mixtures (Ref. 10). Sodium occurs naturally in nearly
all foods; however this intrinsic sodium is not a significant dietary
contributor for most Americans. Essentially, any single-ingredient food
is low in sodium.
E. Sodium Reduction Opportunities
FDA and FSIS are considering potential ways to promote gradual,
achievable and sustainable reduction of sodium intake over time.
Research on a variety of issues, including the development of possible
targets for the reduction of the sodium content of foods, is needed to
assist FDA and FSIS in this effort. Sodium-containing food ingredients
are used for multiple purposes at variable levels in diverse foods. The
sodium intake of the U.S. population reflects both the sodium levels of
individual foods and the amounts of foods consumed. As such, there are
a variety of factors that may inform judgments about appropriate
opportunities for sodium reduction. These factors include:
1. The important role that sodium has in food safety with respect
to limiting microbial growth and maintaining the shelf-life of some
foods;
2. The effect of sodium reduction on the physical attributes (e.g.,
consistency, texture, shape, form) of some foods in ways that may
impact consumer acceptance or food processing and manufacturing
practices;
3. The feasibility, practicality, and cost of reducing sodium in
various food categories;
4. The magnitude (time and percent sodium reduction) of any gradual
or stepwise reduction effort;
5. The need to act gradually in a manner that is acceptable to
consumers, while also achieving significant sodium reduction, because
taste preference for sodium is acquired and can be modified (Refs. 34
and 35).
II. Establishment of a Docket and Request for Specific Input on Certain
Topics
FDA and FSIS are establishing dockets to provide an opportunity for
interested persons to submit comments, research, data, and other
information that will better inform them about current and emerging
practices by the private sector in sodium reduction; current consumer
understanding of the role of sodium in hypertension and other chronic
illnesses; sodium consumption practices; motivation and barriers in
reducing sodium in their food intakes; and issues associated with the
development of targets for sodium reduction in foods to promote
reduction in excess sodium intake. In particular, both agencies welcome
input on the following matters:
1. Comments and research related to recent sodium reduction
initiatives by industry and the effects of those initiatives;
2. Comments and research related to consumer understanding of the
role of sodium in hypertension and other chronic illnesses, sodium
consumption practices, and motivation and barriers in reducing sodium
in their food intakes;
3. Comments and research related to effective strategies for
sustainable and meaningful reduction of sodium in foods sold in
packaged or prepared form across the food supply, including and in
particular foods with a high sales volume;
4. Comments and research related to existing or potential positive
incentives for innovation in reformulating packaged and restaurant
foods to reduce added sodium;
5. Comments and research related to the recommendations from the
April 2010 IOM Sodium report on ``Strategies to Reduce Sodium Intake in
the United States,'' including research related to information gaps
identified in the IOM report (taste preferences for sodium,
technological role of sodium/salt, role of food matrix, food safety,
etc.);
6. Comments and research related to the following: (a) Methods for
establishing sodium reduction targets, including information on general
target design (e.g., setting sodium reduction targets based on food
categories, serving size, or formulations), (b) step-wise
[[Page 57053]]
approaches to achieve sustainable sodium reductions and timeframes for
achieving such reductions, and (c) methods for evaluating the impact of
a sodium reduction strategy;
7. Comments and research related to avoiding potential unintended
consequences for food safety, nutrition (including effects on added
sugars or solid fats), or food manufacturing technologies that could
result from interventions to reduce sodium;
8. Comments and research related to existing voluntary sodium
reduction efforts, including the voluntary sodium reduction targets set
by the New York City-initiated NSRI partnership, and their
applicability to a potentential federal sodium reduction initiative;
9. Comments and research related to food formulation, processing,
production, and other technology that could lead to meaningful and
sustainable reductions in the amount of sodium in food, including
specific food categories, targets, and methods to monitor;
10. Comments and research on the role that food standards of
identity play in promoting or limiting the feasibility of sodium
reduction of foods (among other things, standards of identity for
certain foods define the nature of those foods, generally in terms of
how those foods are prepared, the types of ingredients that they must
contain (i.e., mandatory ingredients) and that they may contain (i.e.,
optional ingredients), and how those foods must be labeled (Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 341); the Federal Meat
Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 607(c)); and the Poultry Products Inspection
Act (21 U.S.C. 457(b)));
11. Comments and research on any advantages of sodium to consumers,
including but not limited to, food safety, nutrition, and palatability;
12. Comments and research on the economic impacts of reducing
sodium, including but not limited to, the cost of food, agricultural
production, small businesses, jobs, and the health care system;
13. Comments and research on the impact of sodium reduction
initiatives on consumer food choices and compliance with 2010 Dietary
Guidelines for Americans recommendations;
14. Comments and research related to how consumers respond to
sodium reductions (i.e., adding back salt to foods, consumption of
reformulated products); and
15. Comments and research related to effective methods for
communicating to the public the health benefits associated with the
sodium intake levels recommended by the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for
Americans.
We anticipate that some interested persons may wish to provide FDA
and FSIS with certain comments, research, data, and information that
they consider to be trade secret or confidential commercial information
(CCI) that would be exempt under Exemption 4 of the Freedom of
Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). You may claim information that you
submit to FDA and FSIS as CCI or trade secret by clearly marking both
the document and the specific information as ``confidential.''
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and the specific agency's
disclosure regulations (FDA's regulations under 21 CFR part 20; FSIS's
regulations under 9 CFR part 390). For electronic submissions to https://www.regulations.gov, indicate in the ``comments'' box of the
appropriate docket that your submission contains confidential
information. You must also submit a copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as confidential for inclusion in the
public version of the official record. Information not marked
confidential will be included in the public version of the official
record without prior notice.
III. Public Meeting
A Federal Register notice will be published in the near future
announcing a public meeting to discuss the topics set forth in this
notice.
IV. Comments
FDA: Interested persons may submit to FDA's Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments
regarding this document. It is only necessary to send one set of
comments. It is no longer necessary to send two copies of mailed
comments. Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in
the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the
Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
FSIS: Interested persons may submit to FSIS's Docket Clerk (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments regarding this
document. Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in
the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the FSIS
Docket Room between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Because two docket numbers are associated with this document,
please include with your comments the docket number that corresponds
with the appropriate agency. Comments submitted for inclusion in both
dockets should be separately submitted to each identified docket number
to ensure consideration.
V. References
FDA has placed the following references on display in FDA's
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). You may see them
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. (FDA has verified the
Web site addresses, but FDA is not responsible for any subsequent
changes to Web sites after this document publishes in the Federal
Register.)
1. IOM (2005). ``Dietary Reference Intakes for Water, Potassium,
Sodium Chloride and Sulfate,'' Washington DC: The National Academies
Press.
2. Xu, J, Kochanek, KD, Murphy, SL, Tejada-Vera, B. ``Deaths:
preliminary data for 2007,'' CDC, National Vital Statistics Report.
2011; 58 (19).
3. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL
Jr, et al. ``The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on
Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood
Pressure,'' Hypertension. 2003; 42: 1206-1252.
4. Carvalho JJ, Baruzzi RG, Howard PF, Poulter N, Alpers MP, Franco
LJ, et al. ``Blood pressure in four remote populations in the
INTERSALT Study,'' Hypertension. 1989 Sep; 14(3): 238-246.
5. IOM (2010). ``Strategies to Reduce Sodium Intake in the United
States,'' Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
6. Sacks FM, Svetkey LP, Vollmer WM, Appel LJ, Bray GA, Harsha D, et
al. ``Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the
Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet.'' DASH-Sodium
Collaborative Research Group. New England Journal of Medicine. 2001
Jan 4; 344(1): 3-10.
7. USDA/HHS (2010). ``Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010, 7th
Edition,'' Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, December
2010.
8. USDA, Agricultural Research Service. ``What we eat in America,
NHANES.'' Available at https://www.ars.usda.gov/Services/docs.htm?docid=13793. Accessed on August 30, 2010.
9. Mattes RD, Donnelly D. ``Relative contributions of dietary sodium
sources,'' Journal of the American College of Nutrition. 1991 Aug;
10(4): 383-93.
10. ``Sodium Intake Among Adults--United States, 2005-2006,'' CDC,
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. June 25, 2010; 59 (24): 746-
749.
11. Palar K, Sturm R. ``Potential societal savings from reduced
sodium consumption in the U.S. adult population.'' American Journal
of Health Promotion. 2009 Sep-Oct; 24(1): 49-57.
[[Page 57054]]
12. Bibbins-Domingo K, Chertow GM, Coxson PG, Moran A, Lightwood JM,
Pletcher MJ, Goldman L. ``Projected Effect of Dietary Salt
Reductions on Future Cardiovascular Disease.'' New England Journal
of Medicine. 2010 Feb 18; 362 (7): 590-599.
13. USDA/HHS (1980). ``Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 1st
Edition.'' Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
14. USDA/HHS (1985). ``Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2nd
Edition.'' Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
15. USDA/HHS (1990). ``Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 3rd
Edition.'' Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
16. USDA/HHS (2000). ``Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 5th
Edition.'' Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
17. USDA/HHS (2005). ``Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 6th
Edition.'' Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
18. Derby, BM and Fein, SB (1995). ``Meeting the NLEA education
challenge: A consumer research perspective.'' In Nutrition Labeling
Handbook, edited by R. Shapiro. New York: M. Dekker: 315-353.
19. FDA. 2007. ``Public Hearing--Regulatory Hearing on Salt and
Sodium--Transcript, November 29, 2007.'' Available at https://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#docketDetail?R=FDA-2007-0545. Accessed on November 19, 2010.
20. Whelton PK., Adams-Campbell LL, Appel LJ, Cutler J, Donato K,
Elmer PJ, et al. ``National High Blood Pressure Education Program
Working Group report on primary prevention of hypertension,''
Archives of Internal Medicine. 1993; 153(2): 186-208.
21. NHLBI (1996). ``Implementing recommendations for dietary salt
reduction: Where are we? Where are we going? How do we get there?
Summary of an NHLBI workshop,'' NIH Publication No. 55-728N.
Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
22. NHLBI (1997). ``The sixth report of the Joint National Committee
on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood
Pressure,'' NIH Publication No. 98-4080. Bethesda, MD: National
Institutes of Health.
23. NHLBI (1999). ``Statement from the National High Blood Pressure
Education Program Coordinating Committee,'' https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/prof/heart/hbp/salt_upd.pdf. Accessed on
April 12, 2010.
24. NHLBI (2002). ``Primary prevention of hypertension: Clinical and
public health advisory from the National High Blood Pressure
Education Program,'' NIH Publication No. 02-5076. Bethesda, MD:
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
25. NHLBI (2004). ``The seventh report of the Joint National
Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and the treatment of
high blood pressure,'' NIH Publication No. 04-5230. Bethesda, MD:
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
26. NHLBI (2010). ``National high blood pressure education
program.'' Available at https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/hbp/prevent/sodium/sodium.htm. Accessed on August 30, 2010.
27. CDC (2010), ``CDC Awards $1.9 Million for State and Local Sodium
Reduction Initiatives.'' Available at https://www.cdc.gov/media/pressrel/2010/r101001.html. Accessed on August 30, 2010.
28. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (2009).
``NYC Starts a Nationwide Initiative to Cut the Salt in Restaurants
and Processed Food.'' Available at https://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/cardio/cardio-salt-initiative.shtml. Accessed on August 30, 2010.
29. United Kingdom Food Standards Agency (2010). ``World talks on
salt reduction in food.'' Available at https://www.food.gov.uk/news/newsarchive/2010/jun/saltmtg. Accessed on August 30, 2010.
30. Health Canada (2010). ``Sodium Reduction Strategy for Canada,
Recommendations of the Sodium Working Group.'' Available at https://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/nutrition/sodium/strateg/index-eng.php.
Accessed on August 30, 2010.
31. Doyle, ME (2008). ``Sodium reduction and its effects on food
safety, food quality and human health.'' FRI Briefings. Food
Research Institute, University of Wisconsin.
32. Tarver T. ``Desalting the Food Grid.'' Food Technology. August
2010; 64(8): 44-50. Available at https://www.ift.org. Accessed on
August 31, 2010.
33. NCI (2010). ``Sources of Sodium Among the U.S. Population (2005-
2006).'' Risk Factor Monitoring and Methods Branch Web site, Applied
Research Program, National Cancer Institute. Available at https://riskfactor.cancer.gov/diet/foodsources/sodium/. Updated January
2010. Accessed on August 30, 2010.
34. Bertino M, Beauchamp GK, Engelman K. ``Long-term reduction in
dietary sodium alters the taste of salt,'' American Journal of
Clinical Nutrition. 1982; 36: 1134-1144.
35. Blais CA, Pangborn RM, Borhani, NO, Ferrell MF, Prineas RJ,
Laing B. ``Effect of dietary sodium restriction on taste responses
to sodium chloride: A longitudinal study,'' American Journal of
Clinical Nutrition. 1986; 44: 232-243.
Dated: September 12, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy, Food and Drug Administration.
Dated: September 12, 2011.
Alfred V. Almanza,
Administrator, Food Safety and Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-23753 Filed 9-13-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P