Progress Reports Rules Revision, 57012-57013 [2011-23687]
Download as PDF
57012
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 179 / Thursday, September 15, 2011 / Proposed Rules
designed to deliver nicotine or other
substances to a user in the form of a
vapor is prohibited.
Smoking means the smoking of
tobacco products or use of electronic
cigarettes and similar products designed
to deliver nicotine or other substances
to a user in the form of a vapor. It does
not include the use of a device such as
a nebulizer that delivers a medically
beneficial substance to a user in the
form of a vapor.
4. Section 252.4 is added to read as
follows:
§ 252.4
Smoking ban: air carriers.
Air carriers shall prohibit smoking on
all scheduled passenger flights.
5. Section 252.8 is revised to read as
follows:
§ 252.8
Extent of smoking restrictions.
The restrictions on smoking described
in §§ 252.4 through 252.7 shall apply to
all locations within the aircraft.
[FR Doc. 2011–23673 Filed 9–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Prisons
28 CFR Part 524
[BOP–AB60–P]
RIN 1120–AB60
Progress Reports Rules Revision
Bureau of Prisons, Justice.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
In this document, the Bureau
of Prisons (Bureau) proposes to remove
from regulations and/or modify two
types of progress reports: Transfer
reports and triennial reports.
DATES: Comments are due by November
14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments to the
Rules Unit, Office of General Counsel,
Bureau of Prisons, 320 First Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20534. You may view
an electronic version of this rule at
https://www.regulations.gov. You may
also comment via the Internet to the
Bureau at BOPRULES@BOP.gov or by
using the https://www.regulations.gov
comment form for this regulation. When
submitting comments electronically you
must include the BOP Docket No. in the
subject box.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sarah Qureshi, Office of General
Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, phone (202)
307–2105.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:34 Sep 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
Posting of Public Comments
Please note that all comments
received are considered part of the
public record and made available for
public inspection online at https://
www.regulations.gov. Such information
includes personal identifying
information (such as your name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter.
If you want to submit personal
identifying information (such as your
name, address, etc.) as part of your
comment, but do not want it to be
posted online, you must include the
phrase ‘‘Personal Identifying
Information’’ in the first paragraph of
your comment. You must also locate all
the personal identifying information
you do not want posted online in the
first paragraph of your comment and
identify what information you want
redacted.
If you want to submit confidential
business information as part of your
comment but do not want it to be posted
online, you must include the phrase
‘‘Confidential Business Information’’ in
the first paragraph of your comment.
You must also prominently identify
confidential business information to be
redacted within the comment. If a
comment has so much confidential
business information that it cannot be
effectively redacted, all or part of that
comment may not be posted on https://
www.regulations.gov.
Personal identifying information
identified and located as set forth above
will be placed in the agency’s public
docket file, but not posted online.
Confidential business information
identified and located as set forth above
will not be placed in the public docket
file. If you wish to inspect the agency’s
public docket file in person by
appointment, please see the ‘‘For
Additional Information’’ paragraph.
In this document, the Bureau
proposes to remove from regulations
and/or modify two types of progress
reports: Transfer reports and triennial
reports.
Section 524.41, entitled ‘‘Types of
progress reports,’’ lists several types of
progress reports prepared for nonBureau entities, such as for parole
hearings, pre-release, final (prepared 90
days before an inmate’s release to a term
of supervision), and for other reasons
(such as upon court request or a
clemency review). The current
regulations also identify two types of
progress reports that were primarily
intended for internal Bureau purposes:
Those prepared when inmates transfer
to community confinement or another
institution, and those prepared
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
triennially if not more frequently done
for any other reason.
Transfer Reports. The current
regulations define ‘‘transfer report’’ as
one prepared on an inmate
recommended and/or approved for
transfer to community confinement or to
another institution and whose progress
has not been summarized within the
previous 180 days. The Bureau proposes
to modify this definition to indicate that
transfer reports will only be prepared on
inmates transferring to non-Bureau
facilities.
Current Bureau practice and advances
in technology have obviated the need to
prepare a specific paper report when an
inmate is transferred between Bureau
facilities. When an inmate is transferred,
all pertinent information regarding the
progress of an inmate being transferred
has already been updated in the
Bureau’s computer system, which staff
may access at all Bureau facilities and
in community confinement. It is,
therefore, unnecessary for a separate
and specific progress report to be
prepared by staff at the transferring
Bureau facility for staff at the receiving
Bureau facility, when receiving facility
staff can easily access this information
themselves.
However, when an inmate is
transferring outside the Bureau, to a
state facility, non-Bureau community
confinement, or other non-Bureau
facility, staff at that facility may not
have access to the Bureau’s computer
system. Therefore, it would be necessary
for Bureau staff to prepare a transfer
report detailing an inmate’s progress in
the Bureau facility for the benefit of staff
at the non-Bureau facility.
Triennial Reports. The Bureau also
proposes to delete triennial reports as a
type of progress report. Current
regulations state that a progress report
will be prepared on each designated
inmate at least once every 36 months if
not previously generated for another
reason.
Before the development of this
internal Bureau computer information
network, triennial reports were a
necessary tool used to provide staff with
specific inmate information. As
explained above, however, current
Bureau practice and advances in
technology have obviated the need to
prepare a specific progress report every
36 months, because all information
regarding an inmate’s progress is
continually updated in the Bureau’s
computer system, which staff may
access at all Bureau facilities.
Executive Order 12866
This rule falls within a category of
actions that the Office of Management
E:\FR\FM\15SEP1.SGM
15SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 179 / Thursday, September 15, 2011 / Proposed Rules
and Budget (OMB) has determined not
to constitute ‘‘significant regulatory
actions’’ under section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866 and, accordingly, it was
not reviewed by OMB.
Executive Order 13132
This regulation will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, under
Executive Order 13132, we determine
that this rule does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Director of the Bureau of Prisons,
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 605(b)), reviewed this regulation
and by approving it certifies that it will
not have a significant economic impact
upon a substantial number of small
entities for the following reasons: This
rule pertains to the correctional
management of offenders committed to
the custody of the Attorney General or
the Director of the Bureau of Prisons,
and its economic impact is limited to
the Bureau’s appropriated funds.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 524
Prisoners.
Thomas R. Kane,
Acting Director, Bureau of Prisons.
Under rulemaking authority vested in
the Attorney General in 5 U.S.C. 552(a)
and delegated to the Director, Bureau of
Prisons, we propose to amend 28 CFR
part 524 as set forth below.
PART 524—CLASSIFICATION OF
INMATES
SUBCHAPTER B—INMATE ADMISSION,
CLASSIFICATION, AND TRANSFER
1. The authority citation for 28 CFR
part 524 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 18 U.S.C. 3521–
3528, 3621, 3622, 3624, 4001, 4042, 4046,
4081, 4082 (Repealed in part as to offenses
committed on or after November 1, 1987),
5006–5024 (Repealed October 12, 1984 as to
offenses committed after that date), 5039; 21
U.S.C. 848; 28 U.S.C. 509, 510.
2. In § 524.41, remove paragraphs (d)
and (e), redesignate paragraph (f) as
paragraph (e), and add a new paragraph
(d) to read as follows:
§ 524.41
Types of progress reports.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Transfer report—prepared on an
inmate transferring to any non-Bureau
facility.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2011–23687 Filed 9–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–05–P
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more
in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by section 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996. This rule will not
result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:34 Sep 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
COMMISSION
29 CFR Part 1602
RIN 3046–AA89
Recordkeeping and Reporting
Requirements Under Title VII, the ADA,
and GINA
Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule: Cancellation of
hearing.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the Commission is cancelling the public
hearing on the above proposed
modifications of its recordkeeping and
reporting provisions under title VII, the
ADA, and GINA. (76 FR 31892, June 2,
2011). No requests to present oral
testimony at a hearing concerning the
proposed rule were received from the
public. Further, the Commission
received only one public comment in
response to the June 2 notice, and the
commenter expressed support for the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57013
proposed changes. Therefore, it will not
be necessary to hold the hearing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas J. Schlageter, Assistant Legal
Counsel, (202) 663–4668, or Erin N.
Norris, Senior Attorney, (202) 663–4876,
Office of Legal Counsel, 131 M Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20507.
Dated: September 8, 2011.
For the Commission.
Jacqueline A. Berrien,
Chair.
[FR Doc. 2011–23601 Filed 9–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6570–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2011–0511; FRL–9462–7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; West
Virginia; Revised Motor Vehicle
Emission Budgets for the Charleston,
Huntington, Parkersburg, Weirton, and
Wheeling 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance
Areas
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA proposes to approve the
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the State of West
Virginia for the purpose of amending
the 8-hour ozone maintenance plan for
the Charleston, Huntington,
Parkersburg, Weirton, and Wheeling 8hour ozone maintenance areas. This
revision amends the maintenance plans’
2009 and 2018 motor vehicle emissions
budgets (MVEBs) by reallocating a
portion of the plans’ safety margins
which results in an increase in the
MVEBs. In the Final Rules section of
this Federal Register, EPA is approving
the State’s SIP submittal as a direct final
rule without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no adverse comments are
received in response to this action, no
further activity is contemplated. If EPA
receives adverse comments, the direct
final rule will be withdrawn and all
public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. EPA will
not institute a second comment period.
Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.
DATES: Comments must be received in
writing by October 17, 2011.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15SEP1.SGM
15SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 179 (Thursday, September 15, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 57012-57013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23687]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Prisons
28 CFR Part 524
[BOP-AB60-P]
RIN 1120-AB60
Progress Reports Rules Revision
AGENCY: Bureau of Prisons, Justice.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Bureau of Prisons (Bureau) proposes to
remove from regulations and/or modify two types of progress reports:
Transfer reports and triennial reports.
DATES: Comments are due by November 14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments to the Rules Unit, Office of General
Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, 320 First Street, NW., Washington, DC
20534. You may view an electronic version of this rule at https://www.regulations.gov. You may also comment via the Internet to the
Bureau at BOPRULES@BOP.gov or by using the https://www.regulations.gov
comment form for this regulation. When submitting comments
electronically you must include the BOP Docket No. in the subject box.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Qureshi, Office of General
Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, phone (202) 307-2105.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Posting of Public Comments
Please note that all comments received are considered part of the
public record and made available for public inspection online at https://www.regulations.gov. Such information includes personal identifying
information (such as your name, address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter.
If you want to submit personal identifying information (such as
your name, address, etc.) as part of your comment, but do not want it
to be posted online, you must include the phrase ``Personal Identifying
Information'' in the first paragraph of your comment. You must also
locate all the personal identifying information you do not want posted
online in the first paragraph of your comment and identify what
information you want redacted.
If you want to submit confidential business information as part of
your comment but do not want it to be posted online, you must include
the phrase ``Confidential Business Information'' in the first paragraph
of your comment. You must also prominently identify confidential
business information to be redacted within the comment. If a comment
has so much confidential business information that it cannot be
effectively redacted, all or part of that comment may not be posted on
https://www.regulations.gov.
Personal identifying information identified and located as set
forth above will be placed in the agency's public docket file, but not
posted online. Confidential business information identified and located
as set forth above will not be placed in the public docket file. If you
wish to inspect the agency's public docket file in person by
appointment, please see the ``For Additional Information'' paragraph.
In this document, the Bureau proposes to remove from regulations
and/or modify two types of progress reports: Transfer reports and
triennial reports.
Section 524.41, entitled ``Types of progress reports,'' lists
several types of progress reports prepared for non-Bureau entities,
such as for parole hearings, pre-release, final (prepared 90 days
before an inmate's release to a term of supervision), and for other
reasons (such as upon court request or a clemency review). The current
regulations also identify two types of progress reports that were
primarily intended for internal Bureau purposes: Those prepared when
inmates transfer to community confinement or another institution, and
those prepared triennially if not more frequently done for any other
reason.
Transfer Reports. The current regulations define ``transfer
report'' as one prepared on an inmate recommended and/or approved for
transfer to community confinement or to another institution and whose
progress has not been summarized within the previous 180 days. The
Bureau proposes to modify this definition to indicate that transfer
reports will only be prepared on inmates transferring to non-Bureau
facilities.
Current Bureau practice and advances in technology have obviated
the need to prepare a specific paper report when an inmate is
transferred between Bureau facilities. When an inmate is transferred,
all pertinent information regarding the progress of an inmate being
transferred has already been updated in the Bureau's computer system,
which staff may access at all Bureau facilities and in community
confinement. It is, therefore, unnecessary for a separate and specific
progress report to be prepared by staff at the transferring Bureau
facility for staff at the receiving Bureau facility, when receiving
facility staff can easily access this information themselves.
However, when an inmate is transferring outside the Bureau, to a
state facility, non-Bureau community confinement, or other non-Bureau
facility, staff at that facility may not have access to the Bureau's
computer system. Therefore, it would be necessary for Bureau staff to
prepare a transfer report detailing an inmate's progress in the Bureau
facility for the benefit of staff at the non-Bureau facility.
Triennial Reports. The Bureau also proposes to delete triennial
reports as a type of progress report. Current regulations state that a
progress report will be prepared on each designated inmate at least
once every 36 months if not previously generated for another reason.
Before the development of this internal Bureau computer information
network, triennial reports were a necessary tool used to provide staff
with specific inmate information. As explained above, however, current
Bureau practice and advances in technology have obviated the need to
prepare a specific progress report every 36 months, because all
information regarding an inmate's progress is continually updated in
the Bureau's computer system, which staff may access at all Bureau
facilities.
Executive Order 12866
This rule falls within a category of actions that the Office of
Management
[[Page 57013]]
and Budget (OMB) has determined not to constitute ``significant
regulatory actions'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and,
accordingly, it was not reviewed by OMB.
Executive Order 13132
This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, under Executive Order 13132,
we determine that this rule does not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Director of the Bureau of Prisons, under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), reviewed this regulation and by
approving it certifies that it will not have a significant economic
impact upon a substantial number of small entities for the following
reasons: This rule pertains to the correctional management of offenders
committed to the custody of the Attorney General or the Director of the
Bureau of Prisons, and its economic impact is limited to the Bureau's
appropriated funds.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This rule
will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or
more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or on the ability of United States-based companies to
compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and export markets.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 524
Prisoners.
Thomas R. Kane,
Acting Director, Bureau of Prisons.
Under rulemaking authority vested in the Attorney General in 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and delegated to the Director, Bureau of Prisons, we
propose to amend 28 CFR part 524 as set forth below.
PART 524--CLASSIFICATION OF INMATES
SUBCHAPTER B--INMATE ADMISSION, CLASSIFICATION, AND TRANSFER
1. The authority citation for 28 CFR part 524 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 18 U.S.C. 3521-3528, 3621, 3622, 3624,
4001, 4042, 4046, 4081, 4082 (Repealed in part as to offenses
committed on or after November 1, 1987), 5006-5024 (Repealed October
12, 1984 as to offenses committed after that date), 5039; 21 U.S.C.
848; 28 U.S.C. 509, 510.
2. In Sec. 524.41, remove paragraphs (d) and (e), redesignate
paragraph (f) as paragraph (e), and add a new paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
Sec. 524.41 Types of progress reports.
* * * * *
(d) Transfer report--prepared on an inmate transferring to any non-
Bureau facility.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-23687 Filed 9-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-05-P