Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Document and Proposed Plan Amendment for the West Mojave (WEMO) Plan, Motorized Vehicle Access Element, Inyo, Kern and Los Angeles and San Bernardino Counties, CA, 56466-56468 [2011-23320]
Download as PDF
56466
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 177 / Tuesday, September 13, 2011 / Notices
(Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039,
Hazard Mitigation Grant.)
Land Management Oregon/Washington
State Office, Portland, Oregon, 30 days
from the date of this publication.
W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
T. 30 S., R. 2 W., accepted August 18, 2011.
T. 20 S., R. 6 W., accepted August 18, 2011.
T. 18 S., R. 12 W., accepted August 18, 2011.
T. 16 S., R. 1 W., accepted August 29, 2011.
T. 19 S., R. 8 W., accepted August 29, 2011.
T. 13 S.,R. 6 W., accepted August 30, 2011.
T. 3 S., R. 3 E., accepted August 30, 2011.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Notice of Intent to Prepare an
Environmental Document and
Proposed Plan Amendment for the
West Mojave (WEMO) Plan, Motorized
Vehicle Access Element, Inyo, Kern
and Los Angeles and San Bernardino
Counties, CA
A copy of the plats may be
obtained from the Land Office at the
Bureau of Land Management, Oregon/
Washington State Office, 333 SW. 1st
Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204, upon
required payment. A person or party
who wishes to protest against a survey
must file a notice that they wish to
protest (at the above address) with the
Oregon/Washington State Director,
Bureau of Land Management, Portland,
Oregon.
BILLING CODE 9111–23–P
AGENCY:
ADDRESSES:
Indian Gaming
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Approved Tribal—
State Class III Gaming Compact.
AGENCY:
This notice publishes an
approval of the gaming compact
between the Flandreau Santee Sioux
Tribe and the State of South Dakota.
DATES: Effective Date: September 13,
2011.
SUMMARY:
Kyle
Hensley, (503) 808–6124, Branch of
Geographic Sciences, Bureau of Land
Management, 333 SW. 1st Avenue,
Portland, Oregon 97204. Persons who
use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339 to contact the above
individual during normal business
hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a
day, 7 days a week, to leave a message
or question with the above individual.
You will receive a reply during normal
business hours.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian
Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant
Secretary—Policy and Economic
Development, Washington, DC 20240,
(202) 219–4066.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under
section 11 of the Indian Gaming
Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA) Public
Law 100–497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in
the Federal Register notice of approved
Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of
engaging in Class III gaming activities
on Indian lands. This Compact increases
the number of gaming devices for which
the Tribe is authorized to operate from
250 to 500.
Dated: August 31, 2011.
Larry Echo Hawk,
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2011–23389 Filed 9–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–4N–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
Before
including your address, phone number,
e-mail address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[LLOR957000–L63100000–HD0000: HAG11–
0343]
Filing of Plats of Survey: Oregon/
Washington
Fred O’Ferrall,
Chief, Branch of Land, Mineral, and Energy
Resources.
[FR Doc. 2011–23303 Filed 9–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–33–P
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
Notice.
ACTION:
The plats of survey of the
following described lands are scheduled
to be officially filed in the Bureau of
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:22 Sep 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
Bureau of Land Management
[[LLCAD00000.L91310000.EI0000]
Willamette Meridian, Oregon
[FR Doc. 2011–23326 Filed 9–12–11; 8:45 am]
AGENCY:
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
In compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended (NEPA), and the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act of 1976, as amended (FLPMA), the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
California Desert District (CDD) intends
to prepare an environmental document
to amend the West Mojave (WEMO) area
plan. By this Notice, the BLM is
announcing the beginning of the
scoping process to solicit public
comments.
SUMMARY:
This notice initiates the public
scoping process for the environmental
document and proposed plan
amendment. Comments on issues may
be submitted in writing until October
13, 2011. The date(s) and location(s) of
any scoping meetings will be
announced at least 15 days in advance
through the local news media,
newspapers, and the BLM Web site at:
https://www.blm.gov/ca/st/en/fo/
cdd.html. In order to be fully considered
in the environmental document, all
scoping comments must be received
prior to the close of the scoping period
or 15 days after the last public meeting,
whichever is later. The BLM will
provide additional opportunities for
public participation upon publication of
the environmental document.
ADDRESSES: The public may submit
comments on planning criteria and
related issues, by any of the following
methods:
• E-mail: cawemopa@blm.gov.
• Web site: https://www.blm.gov/ca/st/
en/fo/cdd/west_mojave_wemo.
• Fax: (951) 697–5299.
• Mail: BLM California Desert District
Office, 22835 Calle San Juan de Los
Lagos, ATTN: Alan Stein, Moreno
Valley, CA 92553–9046.
Documents relevant to this proposal
may be examined at the California
Desert District Office or Web site
(address above), or the BLM’s California
State Office, 2800 Cottage Way,
Sacramento, CA 95825.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM
13SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 177 / Tuesday, September 13, 2011 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alan Stein, telephone (951) 697–5382;
address Bureau of Land Management,
California Desert District Office, 22835
Calle San Juan de Los Lagos, ATTN:
Alan Stein, Moreno Valley, CA 92553–
9046; e-mail cawemopa@blm.gov.
Persons who use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) may call the
Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 to contact the
above individual during normal
business hours. The FIRS is available 24
hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a
message or question with the above
individual. You will receive a reply
during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
California Desert Conservation Area
(CDCA) Plan of 1980 addressed publicland resources and resources use within
25-million acres of land in southern
California. The 1980 CDCA Plan
included 12 plan elements, including a
Motorized Vehicle Element. The
Motorized Vehicle Access Element of
the CDCA Plan addressed both access
and vehicular use of public lands in
southern California, and identified
management guidelines and objectives.
The CDCA Plan of 1980 has been
amended numerous times since it was
adopted in 1982. The CDCA Plan
contains language that has been
judicially determined to restrict
motorized routes to those that existed in
1980.
In 2006, the BLM approved a
comprehensive amendment to the West
Mojave area of the CDCA Plan. In a 2006
Western Mojave Record of Decision
(WEMO ROD) the BLM amended the
CDCA Plan and modified its motorized
vehicle management decisions,
including off-highway vehicle (OHV)
route designation, on more than 3
million acres of public land within the
CDCA. The 2006 WEMO ROD approved
the designation of 5,098 miles of
motorized vehicle routes without
specifically changing the language of the
1980 CDCA plan.
A lawsuit was filed challenging the
WEMO ROD’s route designation
process. In January 2011, a court order
remanded the 2006 WEMO ROD to the
BLM and, in part, directed the BLM to
amend the CDCA Plan and reconsider
route designation throughout the
WEMO area. By court order, the BLM
must issue a revised decision by March
31, 2014.
A plan amendment is necessary to
update language in the Motorized
Vehicle Access Element of the CDCA
Plan. The plan amendment, and
associated environmental documents,
will address two components, among
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:22 Sep 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
others: (1) Alternatives for amending the
Motorized Vehicle Access Element of
the CDCA Plan for the WEMO area; and
(2) Alternative processes for designating
travel routes within the sub-regional
areas of the WEMO plan area.
The main purpose of the scoping
process is to solicit public comments on
the following:
1. Identification of those portions of
the WEMO plan that should be revised
to reflect current management policy
regarding motorized vehicle access;
2. Identification of the process and
decision criteria that should be used to
designate routes in the sub-regional
areas of the WEMO plan area;
3. Identification of motorized vehicle
use issues and concerns within each
sub-regional area of the WEMO plan
area;
4. Identification of the best science
and technology available to identify and
establish viable route networks in the
sub-regional areas of the WEMO plan
area; and
5. Whether the BLM should analyze
an amendment to the WEMO plan as it
relates, primarily, to motorized vehicle
use separately or in conjunction with
sub-regional route designation, and
alternatives to route designation.
The proposed planning effort would
allow the BLM to revise portions of the
Motorized Vehicle Element of the CDCA
Plan to more clearly describe how
motorized vehicle use will be managed
in the CDCA according to current BLM
policy. A primary objective of the
proposed action for this plan
amendment is to replace the following
CDCA Plan language: ‘‘at the minimum,
use will be restricted to existing routes
of travel,’’ with language that reflects
current BLM policy, such as restricting
motorized vehicle use to designated
routes. Other language from the CDCA
Plan may be modified to reduce
confusion and clearly state to the public
where motorized vehicle use is
appropriate and where it is
inappropriate.
Further, subsequently, concurrently,
or in a combination of both, additional
environmental analysis would address
current route designation within the
WEMO sub-regional areas. This analysis
would result in new decisions for each
sub-regional area within the WEMO
plan area that would either retain or
modify, in whole or in part, current
route designations. New route
designation decisions would be issued
in accordance with the route
designation criteria in 43 CFR 8342.1,
and in consideration of other applicable
laws, regulations, and policies.
The public scoping process for this
action will also determine relevant
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56467
issues, impacts, and possible
alternatives that could influence the
scope of the environmental analysis,
and guide the entire process from plan
decision-making to route designation
review in order to comply with the
court order.
The BLM has identified the following
preliminary issues of concern: Special
status species, vegetation communities
(including unique plant assemblages),
special area designations, air quality in
previously designated open areas,
cultural resources, soils, springs and
seeps, fringe-toed lizard habitat, and
cumulative effects.
By this Notice, the BLM is complying
with requirements in 43 CFR 1610.2(c)
to notify the public of potential
amendments to land use plans. The
BLM will integrate the land use
planning process with the NEPA
process. The scoping process will help
determine whether the BLM prepares an
environmental assessment or an
environmental impact statement (EIS),
based on the anticipated level of
impacts. In the event the BLM elects to
prepare an EIS, this notice satisfies the
requirement in 40 CFR 1501.7 to
publish a Notice of Intent to prepare an
EIS.
The BLM will utilize and coordinate
the NEPA commenting process to satisfy
the public involvement process for
Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (NHPA) (16 U.S.C.
470(f)), as provided for in 36 CFR
800.2(d)(3). Tribal consultations will be
conducted in accordance with policy,
and tribal concerns including impacts
on Indian trust assets, if any, will be
given due consideration. Federal, State,
and local agencies, along with other
stakeholders that may be interested or
affected by the BLM’s decision on this
proposed plan amendment or
implementation decisions, are invited to
participate in the scoping process, and
the whole of the public involvement
process.
Preliminary planning criteria include
the following:
1. The plan amendment will comply
with FLPMA, NEPA, and all other
applicable laws, regulations, and
policies.
2. For program-specific guidance for
decisions at the land use planning level,
the process will follow the BLM’s
policies in the Land Use Planning
Handbook, H–1601–1 and Manual
Section 1626, Travel and Transportation
Management.
3. Public participation and
collaboration will be an integral part of
the planning process.
4. The BLM will strive to make
decisions in the plan compatible with
E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM
13SEN1
56468
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 177 / Tuesday, September 13, 2011 / Notices
the existing plans and policies of
adjacent local, State, and Federal
agencies and local American Indian
tribes, as long as the decisions are
consistent with the purposes, policies,
and programs of Federal law and
regulations applicable to public lands.
5. The plan amendment will
incorporate, where applicable and
appropriate, management decisions
brought forward from existing planning
documents.
6. The BLM will work collaboratively
with cooperating agencies and all other
interested groups, agencies, and
individuals.
7. GIS and metadata information will
meet Federal Geographic Data
Committee standards, as required by
Executive Order 12906. All other
applicable BLM data standards will also
be followed.
8. The planning process will provide
for ongoing consultation with American
Indian tribes and strategies for
protecting recognized traditional uses,
e.g., gathering of traditionally used plant
materials.
9. The plan amendment will focus on
developing language for the WEMO area
that conforms to the goals of the
Motorized Vehicle Access Element of
the CDCA Plan as described in the 1982
Plan Amendment #3.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made available any time. While you
can ask the BLM in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public release, the
BLM cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Thomas Pogacnik,
Deputy State Director, Natural Resources.
human remains, in consultation with
the appropriate Indian tribe, and has
determined that there is a cultural
affiliation between the human remains
and a present-day Indian tribe.
Representatives of any Indian tribe that
believes itself to be culturally affiliated
with the human remains may contact
the Maxwell Museum of Anthropology,
University of New Mexico. Repatriation
of the human remains to the Indian tribe
stated below may occur if no additional
claimants come forward.
DATES: Representatives of any Indian
tribe that believes it has a cultural
affiliation with the human remains
should contact the Maxwell Museum of
Anthropology, University of New
Mexico at the address below by
October 13, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Heather Edgar, Curator of
Human Osteology, Maxwell Museum of
Anthropology, University of New
Mexico, MSC01 1050, 1 University of
New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131,
telephone (505) 277–4415.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
here given in accordance with the
Native American Graves Protection and
Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C.
3003, of the completion of an inventory
of human remains in the possession of
Maxwell Museum of Anthropology,
University of New Mexico,
Albuquerque, NM. The human remains
were removed from Sandoval County,
NM.
This notice is published as part of the
National Park Service’s administrative
responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25
U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The determinations in
this notice are the sole responsibility of
the museum, institution, or Federal
agency that has control of the Native
American human remains. The National
Park Service is not responsible for the
determinations in this notice.
[FR Doc. 2011–23320 Filed 9–12–11; 8:45 am]
Consultation
BILLING CODE 4310–40–P
A detailed assessment of the human
remains was made by Maxwell Museum
of Anthropology, University of New
Mexico professional staff in
consultation with representatives of the
Pueblo of Jemez, New Mexico.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[2253–665]
History and Description of the Remains
Notice of Inventory Completion:
Maxwell Museum of Anthropology,
University of New Mexico,
Albuquerque, NM
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Maxwell Museum of
Anthropology, University of New
Mexico has completed an inventory of
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:22 Sep 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
Between the 1930s and 1940s, human
remains representing a minimum of 189
individuals were removed from the
Unshagi site (LA 123), Sandoval County,
NM, during excavations by University of
New Mexico field schools. The human
remains were accessioned by the
museum between 1973 and 1975. No
known individuals were identified. No
associated funerary objects are present.
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Between the 1930s and 1940s, human
remains representing a minimum of 78
individuals were removed from the
Guisewa site (LA 679), Sandoval
County, NM, during excavations by
University of New Mexico field schools.
The human remains were accessioned
by the museum between 1973 and 1975.
No known individuals were identified.
No associated funerary objects are
present.
Between the 1930s and 1940s, human
remains representing a minimum of 65
individuals were removed from the
Nonishagi site (LA 541), Sandoval
County, NM, during excavations by
University of New Mexico field schools.
The human remains were accessioned
by the museum between 1973 and 1975.
No known individuals were identified.
No associated funerary objects are
present.
At unknown dates, human remains
representing a minimum of 84
individuals were removed from various
sites located in the area of ‘‘Jemez.’’ No
known individuals were identified. No
associated funerary objects are present.
The human remains are identified as
ancestral Jemez because they came from
Puebloan sites of the upper Jemez River
drainage. Populations that inhabited
these sites are linked by Native oral
tradition, Euro-American records, and
archeological evidence to members of
the present-day Pueblo of Jemez, New
Mexico.
Determinations Made by the Maxwell
Museum of Anthropology, University of
New Mexico
Officials of the Maxwell Museum of
Anthropology, University of New
Mexico have determined that:
• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(9), the
human remains described above
represent the physical remains of at
least 416 individuals of Native
American ancestry.
• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there
is a relationship of shared group
identity that can be reasonably traced
between the Native American human
remains and the Pueblo of Jemez, New
Mexico.
Additional Requestors and Disposition
Representatives of any other Indian
tribe that believes itself to be culturally
affiliated with the human remains
should contact Heather Edgar, Curator
of Human Osteology, Maxwell Museum
of Anthropology, University of New
Mexico, MSC01 1050, 1 University of
New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131,
telephone (505) 277–4415, before
October 13, 2011. Repatriation of the
human remains to the Pueblo of Jemez,
New Mexico, may proceed after that
E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM
13SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 177 (Tuesday, September 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56466-56468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23320]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[[LLCAD00000.L91310000.EI0000]
Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Document and
Proposed Plan Amendment for the West Mojave (WEMO) Plan, Motorized
Vehicle Access Element, Inyo, Kern and Los Angeles and San Bernardino
Counties, CA
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended (NEPA), and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act
of 1976, as amended (FLPMA), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
California Desert District (CDD) intends to prepare an environmental
document to amend the West Mojave (WEMO) area plan. By this Notice, the
BLM is announcing the beginning of the scoping process to solicit
public comments.
DATES: This notice initiates the public scoping process for the
environmental document and proposed plan amendment. Comments on issues
may be submitted in writing until October 13, 2011. The date(s) and
location(s) of any scoping meetings will be announced at least 15 days
in advance through the local news media, newspapers, and the BLM Web
site at: https://www.blm.gov/ca/st/en/fo/cdd.html. In order to be fully
considered in the environmental document, all scoping comments must be
received prior to the close of the scoping period or 15 days after the
last public meeting, whichever is later. The BLM will provide
additional opportunities for public participation upon publication of
the environmental document.
ADDRESSES: The public may submit comments on planning criteria and
related issues, by any of the following methods:
E-mail: cawemopa@blm.gov.
Web site: https://www.blm.gov/ca/st/en/fo/cdd/west_mojave_wemo.
Fax: (951) 697-5299.
Mail: BLM California Desert District Office, 22835 Calle
San Juan de Los Lagos, ATTN: Alan Stein, Moreno Valley, CA 92553-9046.
Documents relevant to this proposal may be examined at the
California Desert District Office or Web site (address above), or the
BLM's California State Office, 2800 Cottage Way, Sacramento, CA 95825.
[[Page 56467]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Stein, telephone (951) 697-5382;
address Bureau of Land Management, California Desert District Office,
22835 Calle San Juan de Los Lagos, ATTN: Alan Stein, Moreno Valley, CA
92553-9046; e-mail cawemopa@blm.gov. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact the above
individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours
a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question with the above
individual. You will receive a reply during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The California Desert Conservation Area
(CDCA) Plan of 1980 addressed public-land resources and resources use
within 25-million acres of land in southern California. The 1980 CDCA
Plan included 12 plan elements, including a Motorized Vehicle Element.
The Motorized Vehicle Access Element of the CDCA Plan addressed both
access and vehicular use of public lands in southern California, and
identified management guidelines and objectives. The CDCA Plan of 1980
has been amended numerous times since it was adopted in 1982. The CDCA
Plan contains language that has been judicially determined to restrict
motorized routes to those that existed in 1980.
In 2006, the BLM approved a comprehensive amendment to the West
Mojave area of the CDCA Plan. In a 2006 Western Mojave Record of
Decision (WEMO ROD) the BLM amended the CDCA Plan and modified its
motorized vehicle management decisions, including off-highway vehicle
(OHV) route designation, on more than 3 million acres of public land
within the CDCA. The 2006 WEMO ROD approved the designation of 5,098
miles of motorized vehicle routes without specifically changing the
language of the 1980 CDCA plan.
A lawsuit was filed challenging the WEMO ROD's route designation
process. In January 2011, a court order remanded the 2006 WEMO ROD to
the BLM and, in part, directed the BLM to amend the CDCA Plan and
reconsider route designation throughout the WEMO area. By court order,
the BLM must issue a revised decision by March 31, 2014.
A plan amendment is necessary to update language in the Motorized
Vehicle Access Element of the CDCA Plan. The plan amendment, and
associated environmental documents, will address two components, among
others: (1) Alternatives for amending the Motorized Vehicle Access
Element of the CDCA Plan for the WEMO area; and (2) Alternative
processes for designating travel routes within the sub-regional areas
of the WEMO plan area.
The main purpose of the scoping process is to solicit public
comments on the following:
1. Identification of those portions of the WEMO plan that should be
revised to reflect current management policy regarding motorized
vehicle access;
2. Identification of the process and decision criteria that should
be used to designate routes in the sub-regional areas of the WEMO plan
area;
3. Identification of motorized vehicle use issues and concerns
within each sub-regional area of the WEMO plan area;
4. Identification of the best science and technology available to
identify and establish viable route networks in the sub-regional areas
of the WEMO plan area; and
5. Whether the BLM should analyze an amendment to the WEMO plan as
it relates, primarily, to motorized vehicle use separately or in
conjunction with sub-regional route designation, and alternatives to
route designation.
The proposed planning effort would allow the BLM to revise portions
of the Motorized Vehicle Element of the CDCA Plan to more clearly
describe how motorized vehicle use will be managed in the CDCA
according to current BLM policy. A primary objective of the proposed
action for this plan amendment is to replace the following CDCA Plan
language: ``at the minimum, use will be restricted to existing routes
of travel,'' with language that reflects current BLM policy, such as
restricting motorized vehicle use to designated routes. Other language
from the CDCA Plan may be modified to reduce confusion and clearly
state to the public where motorized vehicle use is appropriate and
where it is inappropriate.
Further, subsequently, concurrently, or in a combination of both,
additional environmental analysis would address current route
designation within the WEMO sub-regional areas. This analysis would
result in new decisions for each sub-regional area within the WEMO plan
area that would either retain or modify, in whole or in part, current
route designations. New route designation decisions would be issued in
accordance with the route designation criteria in 43 CFR 8342.1, and in
consideration of other applicable laws, regulations, and policies.
The public scoping process for this action will also determine
relevant issues, impacts, and possible alternatives that could
influence the scope of the environmental analysis, and guide the entire
process from plan decision-making to route designation review in order
to comply with the court order.
The BLM has identified the following preliminary issues of concern:
Special status species, vegetation communities (including unique plant
assemblages), special area designations, air quality in previously
designated open areas, cultural resources, soils, springs and seeps,
fringe-toed lizard habitat, and cumulative effects.
By this Notice, the BLM is complying with requirements in 43 CFR
1610.2(c) to notify the public of potential amendments to land use
plans. The BLM will integrate the land use planning process with the
NEPA process. The scoping process will help determine whether the BLM
prepares an environmental assessment or an environmental impact
statement (EIS), based on the anticipated level of impacts. In the
event the BLM elects to prepare an EIS, this notice satisfies the
requirement in 40 CFR 1501.7 to publish a Notice of Intent to prepare
an EIS.
The BLM will utilize and coordinate the NEPA commenting process to
satisfy the public involvement process for Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) (16 U.S.C. 470(f)), as provided for in
36 CFR 800.2(d)(3). Tribal consultations will be conducted in
accordance with policy, and tribal concerns including impacts on Indian
trust assets, if any, will be given due consideration. Federal, State,
and local agencies, along with other stakeholders that may be
interested or affected by the BLM's decision on this proposed plan
amendment or implementation decisions, are invited to participate in
the scoping process, and the whole of the public involvement process.
Preliminary planning criteria include the following:
1. The plan amendment will comply with FLPMA, NEPA, and all other
applicable laws, regulations, and policies.
2. For program-specific guidance for decisions at the land use
planning level, the process will follow the BLM's policies in the Land
Use Planning Handbook, H-1601-1 and Manual Section 1626, Travel and
Transportation Management.
3. Public participation and collaboration will be an integral part
of the planning process.
4. The BLM will strive to make decisions in the plan compatible
with
[[Page 56468]]
the existing plans and policies of adjacent local, State, and Federal
agencies and local American Indian tribes, as long as the decisions are
consistent with the purposes, policies, and programs of Federal law and
regulations applicable to public lands.
5. The plan amendment will incorporate, where applicable and
appropriate, management decisions brought forward from existing
planning documents.
6. The BLM will work collaboratively with cooperating agencies and
all other interested groups, agencies, and individuals.
7. GIS and metadata information will meet Federal Geographic Data
Committee standards, as required by Executive Order 12906. All other
applicable BLM data standards will also be followed.
8. The planning process will provide for ongoing consultation with
American Indian tribes and strategies for protecting recognized
traditional uses, e.g., gathering of traditionally used plant
materials.
9. The plan amendment will focus on developing language for the
WEMO area that conforms to the goals of the Motorized Vehicle Access
Element of the CDCA Plan as described in the 1982 Plan Amendment
3.
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made available any time. While you can ask the BLM
in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from
public release, the BLM cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Thomas Pogacnik,
Deputy State Director, Natural Resources.
[FR Doc. 2011-23320 Filed 9-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P