Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; North and South Atlantic Swordfish Quotas, 56120-56123 [2011-23269]
Download as PDF
56120
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 176 / Monday, September 12, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Community
No.
State and location
Coolidge, City of, Limestone County .....
480911
Kosse, Town of, Limestone County ......
481151
Limestone
County,
Unincorporated
Areas.
Mexia, City of, Limestone County .........
480910
480442
Region VII
Iowa:
Aplington, City of, Butler County ...........
190335
Aredale, City of, Butler County ..............
190035
Clarksville, City of, Butler County ..........
190336
New Hartford, City of, Butler County .....
190038
Elma, City of, Howard County ...............
190416
Lime Springs, City of, Howard County ..
190417
Riceville, City of, Howard County ..........
190418
Region VIII
South Dakota:
Meade County, Unincorporated Areas ..
460054
Sturgis, City of, Meade County .............
460055
Wyoming:
Dubois, Town of, Fremont County ........
560018
Fremont County, Unincorporated Areas
560080
Hudson, Town of, Fremont County .......
560019
Lander, City of, Fremont County ...........
560020
Riverton, City of, Fremont County .........
560021
Shoshoni, Town of, Fremont County ....
560078
Effective date authorization/cancellation of
sale of flood insurance in community
June 12, 1987, Emerg; November 1,
Reg; September 16, 2011, Susp.
November 19, 1980, Emerg; July 6,
Reg; September 16, 2011, Susp.
February 6, 1979, Emerg; June 1,
Reg; September 16, 2011, Susp.
August 18, 1975, Emerg; August 1,
Reg; September 16, 2011, Susp.
Current effective
map date
Date certain
Federal assistance no longer
available in
SFHAs
1989,
......do ...............
Do.
1982,
......do ...............
Do.
1987,
......do ...............
Do.
1980,
......do ...............
Do.
September 3, 2010, Emerg; N/A, Reg; September 16, 2011, Susp.
November 3, 1975, Emerg; August 19,
1986, Reg; September 16, 2011, Susp.
October 28, 1985, Emerg; September 6,
1989, Reg; September 16, 2011, Susp.
November 6, 1974, Emerg; September 29,
1986, Reg; September 16, 2011, Susp.
May 23, 1978, Emerg; August 1, 1986,
Reg; September 16, 2011, Susp.
January 24, 1977, Emerg; September 1,
1987, Reg; September 16, 2011, Susp.
February 21, 1997, Emerg; March 1, 2000,
Reg; September 16, 2011, Susp.
......do ...............
Do.
......do ...............
Do.
......do ...............
Do.
......do ...............
Do.
......do ...............
Do.
......do ...............
Do.
......do ...............
Do.
April 12, 1973, Emerg; August 1, 1978,
Reg; September 16, 2011, Susp.
February 9, 1973, Emerg; June 1, 1977,
Reg; September 16, 2011, Susp.
......do ...............
Do.
......do ...............
Do.
May 9, 1997, Emerg; November 1, 1998,
Reg; September 16, 2011, Susp.
July 8, 1975, Emerg; February 1, 1979,
Reg; September 16, 2011, Susp.
September 6, 1974, Emerg; July 17, 1978,
Reg; September 16, 2011, Susp.
August 23, 1974, Emerg; September 1,
1978, Reg; September 16, 2011, Susp.
May 18, 1999, Emerg; September 1, 1999,
Reg; September 16, 2011, Susp.
July 5, 1983, Emerg; May 28, 1986, Reg;
September 16, 2011, Susp.
......do ...............
Do.
......do ...............
Do.
......do ...............
Do.
......do ...............
Do.
......do ...............
Do.
......do ...............
Do.
*do = Ditto.
Code for reading third column: Emerg.—Emergency; Reg.—Regular; Susp.—Suspension.
Sandra K. Knight,
Deputy Associate Administrator for
Mitigation.
[FR Doc. 2011–23219 Filed 9–9–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–12–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 635
[Docket No. 110527309–1508–02]
emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
RIN 0648–BA90
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species;
North and South Atlantic Swordfish
Quotas
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:09 Sep 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This final rule adjusts the
North and South Atlantic swordfish
quotas for the 2011 fishing year (January
1, 2011, through December 31, 2011) to
account for the 2010 underharvest and
implement International Commission
for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
(ICCAT) Recommendations 10–02 and
09–03, which maintain the U.S.
allocation of the international total
allowable catch (TAC) for North and
South Atlantic swordfish, respectively.
This rule could affect commercial and
recreational fishing for swordfish in the
Atlantic Ocean, including the Caribbean
Sea and Gulf of Mexico, by establishing
annual quotas. The effects on
commercial and recreational fishermen
are expected to be minimal since the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12SER1.SGM
12SER1
emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 176 / Monday, September 12, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
annual quota has not changed and
recent years’ landings have been less
than adjusted quotas.
DATES: Effective on October 12, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the supporting
documents—including the 2007
Environmental Assessment (EA),
Regulatory Impact Review (RIR), Final
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA),
and the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic
Highly Migratory Species (HMS) Fishery
Management Plan (FMP)—are available
from the HMS Web site at https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/hms/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Cudney or Karyl Brewster-Geisz
by phone: 301–427–8503 or by fax: 301–
713–1917.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S.
Atlantic swordfish fishery is managed
under the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP.
Implementing regulations at 50 CFR part
635 are issued under the authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act), 16 U.S.C. 1801
et seq., and the Atlantic Tunas
Convention Act (ATCA), 16 U.S.C. 971
et seq. ICCAT is an inter-governmental
fishery organization responsible for the
conservation of tunas, tuna-like species,
and other species (including swordfish)
targeted in high seas fisheries or
incidentally captured in tuna fisheries,
in the Atlantic Ocean and its adjacent
seas. The ICCAT Commission can, on
the basis of scientific evidence provided
by the Standing Committee on Research
and Statistics (SCRS) and of other
relevant information, adopt
Recommendations and Resolutions
aimed at maintaining the populations of
ICCAT species at levels which will
permit maximum sustainable catch. As
an active member of ICCAT, the United
States is mandated to implement the
binding recommendations of ICCAT to
comply with this international treaty.
Under ATCA, Congress granted the
authority to promulgate regulations as
may be necessary and appropriate to
implement binding recommendations of
ICCAT. All ICCAT recommendations are
available on the ICCAT Web site at
https://www.iccat.int/en/.
One swordfish measure adopted at the
2010 meeting, and one swordfish
measure adopted at the 2009 meeting
but carried through the 2011 fishing
year, are the subjects of this rulemaking.
Recommendation 10–02,
‘‘Recommendation by ICCAT for the
conservation of north Atlantic
swordfish’’, establishes quota
restrictions for participating nations,
provides for transfers between nations,
maintains minimum size and/or weight
limits for swordfish, maintains previous
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:09 Sep 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
carryover caps, and requires that
participating nations submit a report
detailing the history of their north
Atlantic swordfish fisheries and a
management plan. Recommendation
09–03, ‘‘Recommendation by ICCAT on
south Atlantic swordfish catch limits’’,
establishes catch limits for participating
nations in the south Atlantic swordfish
fishery, provides for transfers of quota
between member nations, and maintains
a carryover cap in the event of
underharvest. Implications of
Recommendation 10–02 and
Recommendation 09–03 are discussed
in the relevant sections below.
Information on the proposed rule can
be found in 75 FR 36892 (June 23, 2011)
and are not repeated here. A brief
summary of the actions in this final rule
can be found below.
North Atlantic Swordfish Quota
This final rule adjusts the total
available North Atlantic swordfish
quota for the 2011 fishing year (January
1, 2011, through December 31, 2011) to
account for the 2010 underharvest, and
transfers 25 metric tons (mt) whole
weight (ww) (18.8 mt dressed weight
(dw)) of quota to Canada from the
reserve category in conformance with
ICCAT Recommendation 10–02. ICCAT
recommendation 10–02 replaces the
provisions of previous ICCAT
Recommendations.
The 2010 North Atlantic swordfish
baseline quota is 2,937.6 mt dw. The
estimated total North Atlantic swordfish
underharvest for 2010 was 2,370.6 mt
dw, which exceeds the maximum
carryover cap of 1,468.8 mt dw,
established in ICCAT Recommendation
06–02 and extended by ICCAT
Recommendation 10–02. Therefore,
NMFS is carrying forward the maximum
amount allowed by the
recommendation. Thus, the baseline
quota plus the underharvest carryover
maximum of 1,468.8 mt dw equals an
adjusted quota of 4,406.4 mt dw for the
2011 fishing year (Table 1).
South Atlantic Swordfish Quota
This final rule adjusts the total
available South Atlantic swordfish
quota for the 2011 fishing year (January
1, 2011, through December 31, 2011) to
account for the 2010 underharvest and
transfer the total South Atlantic
underharvest of 75.0 metric tons (mt)
dressed weight (dw), plus 0.2 mt dw
from the 2011 baseline quota, (100 mt
ˆ
ww) to Namibia, Cote d’Ivoire, and
Belize in conformance with ICCAT
Recommendation 09–03.
The ICCAT South Atlantic swordfish
measure, recommendation 09–03, is a 3year measure that maintains the U.S.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56121
quota of 100 mt ww (75.2 mt dw).
Recommendation 09–03 states that a
total of 100 mt ww (75.2 mt dw) of the
U.S. South Atlantic swordfish quota
must be transferred to other countries.
These transfers are 50 mt ww (37.6 mt
dw) to Namibia, 25 mt ww (18.8 mt dw)
ˆ
to Cote d’Ivoire, and 25 mt ww (18.8 mt
dw) to Belize. In 2010, the 100 mt ww
(75.2 mt dw) that was transferred to
these countries came entirely from the
2009 U.S. underharvested quota. In
2010, landings totaled 0.2 mt dw, and
the United States therefore has 75.0 mt
dw of the 2010 underharvest available
for transfer and will transfer the
remaining 0.2 mt dw from the 2011
baseline quota. Therefore, the 2011
available quota for South Atlantic
swordfish is 75.0 mt dw (see Table 1).
Response to Comments
NMFS received two written
comments on the proposed rule, which
are summarized below with NMFS’s
responses. One submission was
anonymous, while the other was from
an industry organization (Blue Water
Fishermen’s Association). One
submission included comments that
were both relevant to the rule and
beyond the scope of this rulemaking; the
comments beyond the scope of the
rulemaking were separated into a third
comment for the record.
Comment 1: NMFS received one
comment in opposition to the
establishment of North and South
Atlantic commercial swordfish quotas
and one comment that provided general
support for ICCAT swordfish quotas.
Response: The establishment of
annual swordfish quotas is necessary to
comply with ICCAT Recommendation
10–02 and ICCAT Recommendation 09–
03. Under ATCA, the United States is
obligated to promulgate regulations as
may be necessary and appropriate to
carry out the ICCAT recommendations.
Comment 2: One commenter noted
that there was ‘‘no underharvest’’ in the
2010 fishery and noted problems with
the regulations.gov Web page.
Response: NMFS disagrees with the
statement that there was no
underharvest in 2010; the adjusted 2010
quota for North Atlantic swordfish was
4,406.4 mt dw, and the landings
amounted to 2,035.8 mt dw. A total of
2,370.6 mt dw of available swordfish
quota was not landed in 2010 and is
therefore considered underharvest.
Finally, the comment noted problems
with regulations.gov which were
addressed system-wide shortly after the
docket for the proposed rule was
created. Problems associated with
regulations.gov were not considered to
adversely impact the general public
E:\FR\FM\12SER1.SGM
12SER1
56122
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 176 / Monday, September 12, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
because alternative methods for
comment submission were provided in
the proposed rule. Additionally, a
second submission was received
through regulations.gov after the
complaints in the comment were
addressed, indicating a successful
resolution of the problem.
Comment 3: NMFS should (1) replace
time-area closures with adjustments on
the domestic gear restrictions (i.e., circle
hooks, etc.), and re-open the closed
areas within the U.S. EEZ to assist in the
revitalization of the fishery; (2) reinstate
a 33 lb (15 kg) weight limit on swordfish
because NMFS is ‘‘exceeding ICCAT
recommendations’’ by removing the 33
lb minimum weight for swordfish; and,
(3) consider the conservation impacts on
swordfish stocks that come with
transferring U.S. quota away from U.S.
fishermen to countries that do not
exercise the same conservation
standards.
Response: These issues are beyond
the scope of this action. First, this rule
addresses quota specifications, not time/
area closures and other management
measures. Secondly, ICCAT
recommendation 10–02 provides for two
minimum size alternatives for
Contracting Parties. Contracting Parties
may restrict fishermen to a minimum
size of 25 kg live weight OR 125 cm
lower jaw fork length (LJFL) with 15
percent tolerance; alternatively,
Contracting Parties may restrict
fishermen to a minimum size of 15 kg
live weight OR 119 cm LJFL with no
tolerance. In 2009, NMFS decided to
simplify swordfish minimum size to
facilitate enforcement. Minimum length
and weight were considered equal in
effect and refer to the same size of fish;
therefore NMFS decided to drop the
minimum weight requirement of 33 lbs
(15 kg) and only use a minimum length
to protect juvenile swordfish. 50 CFR
§ 635.20 (2009) Since NMFS maintained
the ICCAT minimum size
recommendation of 119 cm LFJL and
ICCAT recommendation 10–02 provides
the option of using a minimum size or
a minimum weight, NMFS disagrees
that the Agency is exceeding ICCAT
recommendations by only implementing
a 119 cm LFJL. Thirdly, the annual
transfers of quota are necessary to
comply with ICCAT Recommendation
10–02, as agreed upon by the
Contracting Parties, which explicitly
states that the United States is to
transfer 25 mt ww (18.8 mt dw) of North
Atlantic swordfish quota and 100 mt
ww (75.2 mt dw) of South Atlantic
swordfish quota, among other things.
Per the ATCA, the United States is
obligated to implement ICCATapproved recommendations.
Changes From the Proposed Rule
No changes have been made to the
proposed rule in this final rule.
TABLE 1—LANDINGS AND QUOTAS FOR THE ATLANTIC U.S. SWORDFISH FISHERIES (2007–2011)
[Values are in metric tons of dressed weight (dw)]
North Atlantic swordfish quota (mt dw)
2007
Baseline Quota ........................................................................................
Quota Carried Over .................................................................................
Adjusted Quota ........................................................................................
Quota Allocation:
Directed Category .............................................................................
Incidental Category ...........................................................................
Reserve Category .............................................................................
Utilized Quota:
Landings ...........................................................................................
Reserve Transfer to Canada ............................................................
Total Underharvest ..................................................................................
Dead Discards .........................................................................................
Carryover Available† ................................................................................
South Atlantic swordfish quota
(mt dw)
2008
2010 **
2011
2,937.6
1,468.8
4,406.4
2,937.6
1,468.8
4,406.4
2,937.6
1,468.8
4,406.4
2,937.6
1,468.8
4,406.4
2,937.6
1,468.8
4,406.4
3,601.9
300.0
504.5
3,620.7
300.0
485.7
3,639.5
300.0
466.9
3,658.3
300.0
448.1
3,677.1
300.0
429.3
1,907.3
18.8
2,480.3
109.8
1,468.8
1,752.7
18.8
2,634.9
149.8
1,468.8
2,027.0
18.8
2,360.6
106.8
1,468.8
**2,035.8
18.8
**2,370.6
98.3
1,468.8
TBD
18.8
TBD
TBD
TBD
2007
Baseline Quota ........................................................................................
Quota Carried Over .................................................................................
Adjusted quota .........................................................................................
Landings ..................................................................................................
Carryover Available ..................................................................................
2009
2008
75.2
75.2
150.4
0.0
75.2
2009
75.2
75.2
150.4
0.0
75.2
75.2
75.2
75.2
0.0
75.2
2010**
2011
75.2
*0.0
75.2
**0.2
75.0
75.2
*¥0.2
75.0
TBD
TBD
† Underharvest is capped at 50 percent of the baseline quota allocation for the North Atlantic and 75.2 dw (100 mt ww) for the South Atlantic.
ˆ
* Under 09–03, 100 mt ww of the U.S. underharvest and base quota, as necessary, was transferred to Namibia (37.6 mt dw, 50 mt ww), Cote
d’Ivoire (18.8 mt dw, 25 mt ww), and Belize (18.8 mt dw, 25 mt ww).
** 2010 landings information is preliminary and is subject to change based on the 2011 ICCAT National Report.
emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Classification
The Assistant Administrator for
Fisheries has determined that this final
rule is necessary for the conservation
and management of Atlantic swordfish
and that it is consistent with the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP, the MagnusonStevens Act, ATCA, and other
applicable law.
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Sep 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration during
the proposed rule stage that this action
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The factual basis for the
certification was published in the
proposed rule and is not repeated here.
No comments were received regarding
this certification. As a result, a
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
regulatory flexibility analysis was not
required and none was prepared.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 635
Fisheries, Fishing, Fishing vessels,
Foreign Relations, Imports, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Treaties.
E:\FR\FM\12SER1.SGM
12SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 176 / Monday, September 12, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: September 7, 2011.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.; 16 U.S.C.
1801 et seq.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 635 is amended
as follows:
§ 635.27
PART 635—ATLANTIC HIGHLY
MIGRATORY SPECIES
1. The authority citation for part 635
continues to read as follows:
emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:09 Sep 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
2. In § 635.27, paragraph (c)(1)(i)(B) is
revised to read as follows:
■
Quotas.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) A swordfish from the North
Atlantic swordfish stock landed by a
vessel for which an incidental catch
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
56123
permit for swordfish or an HMS Angling
or Charter/Headboat permit has been
issued, or caught after the effective date
of a closure of the directed fishery from
a vessel for which a directed fishery
permit or a handgear permit for
swordfish has been issued, is counted
against the incidental catch quota. The
annual incidental category quota is 300
mt dw for each fishing year.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2011–23269 Filed 9–9–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\12SER1.SGM
12SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 176 (Monday, September 12, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 56120-56123]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23269]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 635
[Docket No. 110527309-1508-02]
RIN 0648-BA90
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; North and South Atlantic
Swordfish Quotas
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule adjusts the North and South Atlantic swordfish
quotas for the 2011 fishing year (January 1, 2011, through December 31,
2011) to account for the 2010 underharvest and implement International
Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT)
Recommendations 10-02 and 09-03, which maintain the U.S. allocation of
the international total allowable catch (TAC) for North and South
Atlantic swordfish, respectively. This rule could affect commercial and
recreational fishing for swordfish in the Atlantic Ocean, including the
Caribbean Sea and Gulf of Mexico, by establishing annual quotas. The
effects on commercial and recreational fishermen are expected to be
minimal since the
[[Page 56121]]
annual quota has not changed and recent years' landings have been less
than adjusted quotas.
DATES: Effective on October 12, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the supporting documents--including the 2007
Environmental Assessment (EA), Regulatory Impact Review (RIR), Final
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA), and the 2006 Consolidated
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species (HMS) Fishery Management Plan (FMP)--
are available from the HMS Web site at https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/hms/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Cudney or Karyl Brewster-
Geisz by phone: 301-427-8503 or by fax: 301-713-1917.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. Atlantic swordfish fishery is
managed under the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP. Implementing regulations
at 50 CFR part 635 are issued under the authority of the Magnuson-
Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act),
16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., and the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act (ATCA),
16 U.S.C. 971 et seq. ICCAT is an inter-governmental fishery
organization responsible for the conservation of tunas, tuna-like
species, and other species (including swordfish) targeted in high seas
fisheries or incidentally captured in tuna fisheries, in the Atlantic
Ocean and its adjacent seas. The ICCAT Commission can, on the basis of
scientific evidence provided by the Standing Committee on Research and
Statistics (SCRS) and of other relevant information, adopt
Recommendations and Resolutions aimed at maintaining the populations of
ICCAT species at levels which will permit maximum sustainable catch. As
an active member of ICCAT, the United States is mandated to implement
the binding recommendations of ICCAT to comply with this international
treaty. Under ATCA, Congress granted the authority to promulgate
regulations as may be necessary and appropriate to implement binding
recommendations of ICCAT. All ICCAT recommendations are available on
the ICCAT Web site at https://www.iccat.int/en/.
One swordfish measure adopted at the 2010 meeting, and one
swordfish measure adopted at the 2009 meeting but carried through the
2011 fishing year, are the subjects of this rulemaking. Recommendation
10-02, ``Recommendation by ICCAT for the conservation of north Atlantic
swordfish'', establishes quota restrictions for participating nations,
provides for transfers between nations, maintains minimum size and/or
weight limits for swordfish, maintains previous carryover caps, and
requires that participating nations submit a report detailing the
history of their north Atlantic swordfish fisheries and a management
plan. Recommendation 09-03, ``Recommendation by ICCAT on south Atlantic
swordfish catch limits'', establishes catch limits for participating
nations in the south Atlantic swordfish fishery, provides for transfers
of quota between member nations, and maintains a carryover cap in the
event of underharvest. Implications of Recommendation 10-02 and
Recommendation 09-03 are discussed in the relevant sections below.
Information on the proposed rule can be found in 75 FR 36892 (June
23, 2011) and are not repeated here. A brief summary of the actions in
this final rule can be found below.
North Atlantic Swordfish Quota
This final rule adjusts the total available North Atlantic
swordfish quota for the 2011 fishing year (January 1, 2011, through
December 31, 2011) to account for the 2010 underharvest, and transfers
25 metric tons (mt) whole weight (ww) (18.8 mt dressed weight (dw)) of
quota to Canada from the reserve category in conformance with ICCAT
Recommendation 10-02. ICCAT recommendation 10-02 replaces the
provisions of previous ICCAT Recommendations.
The 2010 North Atlantic swordfish baseline quota is 2,937.6 mt dw.
The estimated total North Atlantic swordfish underharvest for 2010 was
2,370.6 mt dw, which exceeds the maximum carryover cap of 1,468.8 mt
dw, established in ICCAT Recommendation 06-02 and extended by ICCAT
Recommendation 10-02. Therefore, NMFS is carrying forward the maximum
amount allowed by the recommendation. Thus, the baseline quota plus the
underharvest carryover maximum of 1,468.8 mt dw equals an adjusted
quota of 4,406.4 mt dw for the 2011 fishing year (Table 1).
South Atlantic Swordfish Quota
This final rule adjusts the total available South Atlantic
swordfish quota for the 2011 fishing year (January 1, 2011, through
December 31, 2011) to account for the 2010 underharvest and transfer
the total South Atlantic underharvest of 75.0 metric tons (mt) dressed
weight (dw), plus 0.2 mt dw from the 2011 baseline quota, (100 mt ww)
to Namibia, C[ocirc]te d'Ivoire, and Belize in conformance with ICCAT
Recommendation 09-03.
The ICCAT South Atlantic swordfish measure, recommendation 09-03,
is a 3-year measure that maintains the U.S. quota of 100 mt ww (75.2 mt
dw). Recommendation 09-03 states that a total of 100 mt ww (75.2 mt dw)
of the U.S. South Atlantic swordfish quota must be transferred to other
countries. These transfers are 50 mt ww (37.6 mt dw) to Namibia, 25 mt
ww (18.8 mt dw) to C[ocirc]te d'Ivoire, and 25 mt ww (18.8 mt dw) to
Belize. In 2010, the 100 mt ww (75.2 mt dw) that was transferred to
these countries came entirely from the 2009 U.S. underharvested quota.
In 2010, landings totaled 0.2 mt dw, and the United States therefore
has 75.0 mt dw of the 2010 underharvest available for transfer and will
transfer the remaining 0.2 mt dw from the 2011 baseline quota.
Therefore, the 2011 available quota for South Atlantic swordfish is
75.0 mt dw (see Table 1).
Response to Comments
NMFS received two written comments on the proposed rule, which are
summarized below with NMFS's responses. One submission was anonymous,
while the other was from an industry organization (Blue Water
Fishermen's Association). One submission included comments that were
both relevant to the rule and beyond the scope of this rulemaking; the
comments beyond the scope of the rulemaking were separated into a third
comment for the record.
Comment 1: NMFS received one comment in opposition to the
establishment of North and South Atlantic commercial swordfish quotas
and one comment that provided general support for ICCAT swordfish
quotas.
Response: The establishment of annual swordfish quotas is necessary
to comply with ICCAT Recommendation 10-02 and ICCAT Recommendation 09-
03. Under ATCA, the United States is obligated to promulgate
regulations as may be necessary and appropriate to carry out the ICCAT
recommendations.
Comment 2: One commenter noted that there was ``no underharvest''
in the 2010 fishery and noted problems with the regulations.gov Web
page.
Response: NMFS disagrees with the statement that there was no
underharvest in 2010; the adjusted 2010 quota for North Atlantic
swordfish was 4,406.4 mt dw, and the landings amounted to 2,035.8 mt
dw. A total of 2,370.6 mt dw of available swordfish quota was not
landed in 2010 and is therefore considered underharvest. Finally, the
comment noted problems with regulations.gov which were addressed
system-wide shortly after the docket for the proposed rule was created.
Problems associated with regulations.gov were not considered to
adversely impact the general public
[[Page 56122]]
because alternative methods for comment submission were provided in the
proposed rule. Additionally, a second submission was received through
regulations.gov after the complaints in the comment were addressed,
indicating a successful resolution of the problem.
Comment 3: NMFS should (1) replace time-area closures with
adjustments on the domestic gear restrictions (i.e., circle hooks,
etc.), and re-open the closed areas within the U.S. EEZ to assist in
the revitalization of the fishery; (2) reinstate a 33 lb (15 kg) weight
limit on swordfish because NMFS is ``exceeding ICCAT recommendations''
by removing the 33 lb minimum weight for swordfish; and, (3) consider
the conservation impacts on swordfish stocks that come with
transferring U.S. quota away from U.S. fishermen to countries that do
not exercise the same conservation standards.
Response: These issues are beyond the scope of this action. First,
this rule addresses quota specifications, not time/area closures and
other management measures. Secondly, ICCAT recommendation 10-02
provides for two minimum size alternatives for Contracting Parties.
Contracting Parties may restrict fishermen to a minimum size of 25 kg
live weight OR 125 cm lower jaw fork length (LJFL) with 15 percent
tolerance; alternatively, Contracting Parties may restrict fishermen to
a minimum size of 15 kg live weight OR 119 cm LJFL with no tolerance.
In 2009, NMFS decided to simplify swordfish minimum size to facilitate
enforcement. Minimum length and weight were considered equal in effect
and refer to the same size of fish; therefore NMFS decided to drop the
minimum weight requirement of 33 lbs (15 kg) and only use a minimum
length to protect juvenile swordfish. 50 CFR Sec. 635.20 (2009) Since
NMFS maintained the ICCAT minimum size recommendation of 119 cm LFJL
and ICCAT recommendation 10-02 provides the option of using a minimum
size or a minimum weight, NMFS disagrees that the Agency is exceeding
ICCAT recommendations by only implementing a 119 cm LFJL. Thirdly, the
annual transfers of quota are necessary to comply with ICCAT
Recommendation 10-02, as agreed upon by the Contracting Parties, which
explicitly states that the United States is to transfer 25 mt ww (18.8
mt dw) of North Atlantic swordfish quota and 100 mt ww (75.2 mt dw) of
South Atlantic swordfish quota, among other things. Per the ATCA, the
United States is obligated to implement ICCAT-approved recommendations.
Changes From the Proposed Rule
No changes have been made to the proposed rule in this final rule.
Table 1--Landings and Quotas for the Atlantic U.S. Swordfish Fisheries (2007-2011)
[Values are in metric tons of dressed weight (dw)]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
North Atlantic swordfish quota (mt dw) 2007 2008 2009 2010 ** 2011
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baseline Quota................................. 2,937.6 2,937.6 2,937.6 2,937.6 2,937.6
Quota Carried Over............................. 1,468.8 1,468.8 1,468.8 1,468.8 1,468.8
Adjusted Quota................................. 4,406.4 4,406.4 4,406.4 4,406.4 4,406.4
Quota Allocation:
Directed Category.......................... 3,601.9 3,620.7 3,639.5 3,658.3 3,677.1
Incidental Category........................ 300.0 300.0 300.0 300.0 300.0
Reserve Category........................... 504.5 485.7 466.9 448.1 429.3
Utilized Quota:
Landings................................... 1,907.3 1,752.7 2,027.0 **2,035.8 TBD
Reserve Transfer to Canada................. 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8
Total Underharvest............................. 2,480.3 2,634.9 2,360.6 **2,370.6 TBD
Dead Discards.................................. 109.8 149.8 106.8 98.3 TBD
Carryover Available[dagger].................... 1,468.8 1,468.8 1,468.8 1,468.8 TBD
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
South Atlantic swordfish quota (mt dw) 2007 2008 2009 2010** 2011
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baseline Quota................................. 75.2 75.2 75.2 75.2 75.2
Quota Carried Over............................. 75.2 75.2 75.2 *0.0 *-0.2
Adjusted quota................................. 150.4 150.4 75.2 75.2 75.0
Landings....................................... 0.0 0.0 0.0 **0.2 TBD
Carryover Available............................ 75.2 75.2 75.2 75.0 TBD
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[dagger] Underharvest is capped at 50 percent of the baseline quota allocation for the North Atlantic and 75.2
dw (100 mt ww) for the South Atlantic.
* Under 09-03, 100 mt ww of the U.S. underharvest and base quota, as necessary, was transferred to Namibia (37.6
mt dw, 50 mt ww), C[ocirc]te d'Ivoire (18.8 mt dw, 25 mt ww), and Belize (18.8 mt dw, 25 mt ww).
** 2010 landings information is preliminary and is subject to change based on the 2011 ICCAT National Report.
Classification
The Assistant Administrator for Fisheries has determined that this
final rule is necessary for the conservation and management of Atlantic
swordfish and that it is consistent with the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP,
the Magnuson-Stevens Act, ATCA, and other applicable law.
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration during the proposed rule stage that this action would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The factual basis for the certification was published in the
proposed rule and is not repeated here. No comments were received
regarding this certification. As a result, a regulatory flexibility
analysis was not required and none was prepared.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 635
Fisheries, Fishing, Fishing vessels, Foreign Relations, Imports,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Treaties.
[[Page 56123]]
Dated: September 7, 2011.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 635 is amended
as follows:
PART 635--ATLANTIC HIGHLY MIGRATORY SPECIES
0
1. The authority citation for part 635 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 635.27, paragraph (c)(1)(i)(B) is revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 635.27 Quotas.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) A swordfish from the North Atlantic swordfish stock landed by a
vessel for which an incidental catch permit for swordfish or an HMS
Angling or Charter/Headboat permit has been issued, or caught after the
effective date of a closure of the directed fishery from a vessel for
which a directed fishery permit or a handgear permit for swordfish has
been issued, is counted against the incidental catch quota. The annual
incidental category quota is 300 mt dw for each fishing year.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-23269 Filed 9-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P