Airworthiness Standards; Rotor Overspeed Requirements; Correction, 55553 [2011-23025]
Download as PDF
55553
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 174
Thursday, September 8, 2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 33
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0398; Amendment
No. 33–31]
RIN 2120–AJ62
Airworthiness Standards; Rotor
Overspeed Requirements; Correction
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
The FAA is correcting an
unintentional error in the preamble of
the final rule, Airworthiness Standards;
Rotor Overspeed Requirements,
published on July 18, 2011 (76 FR
42020). The final rule established
uniform rotor overspeed design and test
requirements for aircraft engines and
turbochargers certificated by the FAA
and the European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA). This document corrects
an error in the preamble.
DATES: Effective September 8, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical questions concerning this final
rule, contact Tim Mouzakis, Engine and
Propeller Directorate Standards Staff,
ANE–111, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, Federal Aviation
Administration, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington,
Massachusetts 01803–5299; telephone
(781) 238–7114; fax (781) 238–7199;
e-mail timoleon.mouzakis@faa.gov. For
legal questions concerning this final
rule contact Vincent Bennett, ANE–7,
Office of Regional Counsel, Federal
Aviation Administration, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington,
Massachusetts 01803–5299; telephone
(781) 238–7044; fax (781) 238–7055; email vincent.bennett@faa.gov.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:47 Sep 07, 2011
Background
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
On Monday, July 18, 2011, the FAA
published a final rule entitled
‘‘Airworthiness Standards; Rotor
Overspeed Requirements’’ (76 FR
42022). The final rule revised the
aircraft turbine engine rotor overspeed
type certification standards.
During the review process, we
determined a portion of the section
entitled ‘‘Total Estimated Benefits and
Costs of this Proposed Rule’’ should be
removed. We found that this section
included a discussion of a comment that
had already been fully discussed in the
paragraph headed ‘‘Material Properties
of Test Rotors’’. We are therefore
eliminating discussion of this comment
in the benefits and costs section of the
preamble.
Federal Aviation Administration
Correction to Preamble
1. On page 42022, third column,
revise the first full paragraph of ‘‘Total
Estimated Benefits and Costs of This
Proposed Rule’’ to read as follows:
‘‘Industry must currently certificate to the
two standards that are substantively similar,
but have a few slightly different testing and
documentation procedures and requirements.
The rule harmonizes these procedures and
requirements to the higher standard and,
thereby, may increase safety. In addition, by
reducing the amount of duplicative testing
that would need to be either witnessed or
analyzed by the FAA, the FAA is better able
to prioritize its resources to other, more
safety critical areas. Consequently, we
determined that unquantifiable future
minimal benefits from the rule may also
accrue. The FAA concludes that the
combination of cost savings and potential
increased safety benefits will make this rule
cost beneficial. Further, we therefore
determined that this rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as defined in section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, and is not
‘‘significant’’ as defined in DOT’S Regulatory
Policies and Procedures.’’
This correction ensures correct
understanding of and FAA response to
comments received. There are no
changes to the existing regulatory text.
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 31,
2011.
Dennis R. Pratte,
Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2011–23025 Filed 9–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0087; Airspace
Docket No. 11–ASO–12]
Amendment of Class D Airspace; Eglin
AFB, FL
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action amends Class D
Airspace in the Eglin Air Force Base
(AFB), FL airspace area. The Destin
Non-Directional Beacon (NDB) has been
decommissioned and new Standard
Instrument Approaches have been
developed for Destin-Fort Walton Beach
Airport that enhances the safety and
management of Instrument Flight Rules
(IFR) operations at the airport.
This action also corrects the
geographic coordinates of Eglin AFB,
Duke Field, and Hulbert Field.
DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, October 20,
2011. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by
reference action under title 1, Code of
Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to
the annual revision of FAA Order
7400.9 and publication of conforming
amendments.
SUMMARY:
John
Fornito, Operations Support Group,
Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation
Administration, P.O. Box 20636,
Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404)
305–6364.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
History
On July 1, 2011, the FAA published
in the Federal Register a notice of
proposed rulemaking to amend Class D
airspace in the Eglin AFB, FL area (76
FR 38580) Docket No. FAA–2011–0087.
Subsequent to publication, the FAA
found that the latitude coordinates for
Eglin AFB were not rounded up. This
rule makes that correction. Also, this
action adjusts the geographic
coordinates for Duke Field and Hurlburt
Field. Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking effort by
submitting written comments on the
proposal to the FAA. One comment was
received supporting this action. Class D
airspace designations are published in
E:\FR\FM\08SER1.SGM
08SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 174 (Thursday, September 8, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 55553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23025]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 55553]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 33
[Docket No. FAA-2010-0398; Amendment No. 33-31]
RIN 2120-AJ62
Airworthiness Standards; Rotor Overspeed Requirements; Correction
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting an unintentional error in the preamble
of the final rule, Airworthiness Standards; Rotor Overspeed
Requirements, published on July 18, 2011 (76 FR 42020). The final rule
established uniform rotor overspeed design and test requirements for
aircraft engines and turbochargers certificated by the FAA and the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). This document corrects an error
in the preamble.
DATES: Effective September 8, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical questions concerning
this final rule, contact Tim Mouzakis, Engine and Propeller Directorate
Standards Staff, ANE-111, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Federal
Aviation Administration, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington,
Massachusetts 01803-5299; telephone (781) 238-7114; fax (781) 238-7199;
e-mail timoleon.mouzakis@faa.gov. For legal questions concerning this
final rule contact Vincent Bennett, ANE-7, Office of Regional Counsel,
Federal Aviation Administration, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, Massachusetts 01803-5299; telephone (781) 238-7044; fax
(781) 238-7055; e-mail vincent.bennett@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Background
On Monday, July 18, 2011, the FAA published a final rule entitled
``Airworthiness Standards; Rotor Overspeed Requirements'' (76 FR
42022). The final rule revised the aircraft turbine engine rotor
overspeed type certification standards.
During the review process, we determined a portion of the section
entitled ``Total Estimated Benefits and Costs of this Proposed Rule''
should be removed. We found that this section included a discussion of
a comment that had already been fully discussed in the paragraph headed
``Material Properties of Test Rotors''. We are therefore eliminating
discussion of this comment in the benefits and costs section of the
preamble.
Correction to Preamble
1. On page 42022, third column, revise the first full paragraph of
``Total Estimated Benefits and Costs of This Proposed Rule'' to read as
follows:
``Industry must currently certificate to the two standards that
are substantively similar, but have a few slightly different testing
and documentation procedures and requirements. The rule harmonizes
these procedures and requirements to the higher standard and,
thereby, may increase safety. In addition, by reducing the amount of
duplicative testing that would need to be either witnessed or
analyzed by the FAA, the FAA is better able to prioritize its
resources to other, more safety critical areas. Consequently, we
determined that unquantifiable future minimal benefits from the rule
may also accrue. The FAA concludes that the combination of cost
savings and potential increased safety benefits will make this rule
cost beneficial. Further, we therefore determined that this rule is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' as defined in section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, and is not ``significant'' as defined in
DOT'S Regulatory Policies and Procedures.''
This correction ensures correct understanding of and FAA response
to comments received. There are no changes to the existing regulatory
text.
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 31, 2011.
Dennis R. Pratte,
Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2011-23025 Filed 9-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P