Milk in the Mideast Marketing Area; Notice of Hearing on Proposed Amendments to Tentative Marketing Agreement and Order, 55608-55609 [2011-22945]
Download as PDF
55608
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 174
Thursday, September 8, 2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1033
[Docket No. AO–11–0333; AMS–DA–11–
0067; DA–11–04]
Milk in the Mideast Marketing Area;
Notice of Hearing on Proposed
Amendments to Tentative Marketing
Agreement and Order
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice of public hearing on
proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
A public hearing is being held
to consider and take evidence on a
proposal to modify the Pool Plant
Definition in the Mideast Milk
Marketing Order.
DATES: The hearing will convene at
8 a.m. on Tuesday, October 4, 2011.
ADDRESSES: The hearing will be held at
the Westin Cincinnati Hotel, 21 E 5th
Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, (513)
621–7700.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Francis, Director, Order
Formulation and Enforcement Division,
USDA/AMS/Dairy Programs, Stop
0231–Room 2971–S, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–
0231, (202) 720–7183, e-mail:
William.Francis@ams.usda.gov.
Persons requiring a sign language
interpreter or other special
accommodations should contact Paul
Huber, Market Administrator, before the
hearing begins at (330) 225–4758 or
e-mail: phuber@fmmaclev.com.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
administrative action is governed by the
provisions of sections 556 and 557 of
Title 5 of the United States Code and,
therefore, is excluded from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866.
Notice is hereby given of a public
hearing to be held at the Westin
Cincinnati Hotel, Cincinnati, Ohio
beginning at 8 a.m. on Tuesday, October
4, 2011, with respect to a proposed
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:33 Sep 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
amendment to the tentative marketing
agreement and to the order regulating
the handling of milk in the Mideast
marketing area.
The hearing is called pursuant to the
provisions of the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674) (Act), and the
applicable rules of practice and
procedure governing the formulation of
marketing agreements and marketing
orders (7 CFR part 900).
The purpose of the hearing is to
receive evidence with respect to the
economic and marketing conditions
which relate to the proposed
amendments, hereinafter set forth, and
any appropriate modifications thereof,
to the tentative marketing agreement
and to the order.
Evidence also will be taken to
determine whether emergency
marketing conditions exist that would
warrant omission of a recommended
decision under the rules of practice and
procedure (7 CFR 900.12(d)) with
respect to any proposed amendments.
Actions under the Federal milk order
program are subject to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612)
(RFA). The RFA seeks to ensure that,
within the statutory authority of a
program, the regulatory and information
collection requirements are tailored to
the size and nature of small businesses.
For the purpose of the RFA, a dairy farm
is a ‘‘small business’’ if it has an annual
gross revenue of less than $750,000, and
a dairy products manufacturer is a
‘‘small business’’ if it has fewer than 500
employees (13 CFR 121.201). Most
parties subject to a milk order are
considered as a small business.
Accordingly, interested parties are
invited to present evidence on the
probable regulatory and informational
impact of the hearing proposals on
small businesses. Also, parties may
suggest modifications of these proposals
for the purpose of tailoring their
applicability to small businesses.
The amendments to the rules
proposed herein have been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. They are not intended to
have a retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 8c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler
subject to an order may request
modification or exemption from such
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
order by filing with the Department of
Agriculture (USDA) a petition stating
that the order, any provision of the
order, or any obligation imposed in
connection with the order is not in
accordance with the law. A handler is
afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After a hearing, the
USDA would rule on the petition. The
Act provides that the district court of
the United States in any district in
which the handler is an inhabitant, has
its principal place of business, has
jurisdiction in equity to review the
USDA’s ruling on the petition, provided
a bill in equity is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
Interested parties who wish to
introduce exhibits should provide the
Administrative Law Judge at the hearing
with (4) copies of such exhibits for the
Official Record. Additional copies
should be made available for use by
other hearing participants. Any party
that has submitted a proposal notice
herein, when participating as a witness,
is required to make their testimony—if
prepared as an exhibit—and any other
exhibits, available to USDA officials
prior to the start of the hearing on the
day of their appearance. Individual
dairy farmers are not subject to this
requirement.
The hearing will continue until such
time as determined to have ended by the
presiding Administrative Law Judge. If
necessary, the schedule for the next
session will be announced at the time of
adjournment. Such reconvening date
and time will also be posted on the
AMS-Dairy Programs Web site at: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/dairy.
The proposed amendments, as set
forth below, have not received the
approval of the Department.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1033
Milk marketing orders.
The authority citations for 7 CFR part
1033 read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674, and 7253.
E:\FR\FM\08SEP1.SGM
08SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Proposed by Foremost Farms USA
Cooperative, Inc.; National Farmers
Organization, Inc.; Dairy Farmers of
America, Inc.; Michigan Milk
Producers Association; Dairylea
Cooperative, Inc.; and Continental
Dairy Products, Inc.
Proposal 1
This proposal seeks to alter the
definition of a pool distributing plant
within the Mideast Milk Marketing
Order. Specifically, the proposal
recommends that a distributing plant,
which is physically located within the
Mideast Milk Marketing Order, be
regulated by that order if half of its total
route disposition is within Federal Milk
Marketing Area boundaries and its sales
patterns are such that no one Order has
more than 25% of its sales volume. This
proposed change would only affect the
Mideast Milk Marketing Order.
1. Amend § 1033.7 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
§ 1033.7
Pool plant
*
*
*
*
*
(a) A distributing plant, other than a
plant qualified as a pool plant pursuant
to paragraph (b) of this section or
§ ____.7(b) of any other Federal milk
order, from which during the month 30
percent or more of the total quantity of
fluid milk products physically received
at the plant (excluding concentrated
milk received from another plant by
agreement for other than Class I use) are
disposed of as route disposition or are
transferred in the form of packaged fluid
milk products to other distributing
plants. At least 25 percent of such route
disposition and transfers must be to
outlets in the marketing area. Plants
located within the marketing area with
combined route disposition and
transfers of at least 50% into Federal
Order marketing areas but without 25%
of route disposition and transfers into
any one Federal Order will be regulated
as a distributing plant in this Order.
*
*
*
*
*
Proposed by Dairy Programs,
Agricultural Marketing Service
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Dated: September 2, 2011.
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011–22945 Filed 9–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[Docket No. EERE–2010–BT–PET–0047]
RIN 1904–AC57
Energy Conservation Program for
Consumer Products: Request for
Exclusion of 120 Volt, 100 Watt R20
Short Incandescent Reflector Lamp for
Spa Applications From Energy
Conservation Standards
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy (DOE).
ACTION: Request for information and
notice of granting of petition for
rulemaking.
AGENCY:
Proposal 2
Make such changes as may be
necessary to make the entire marketing
agreement and the order conform with
any amendments thereto that may result
from this hearing.
Copies of this notice of hearing and
the order may be procured from the
Market Administrator of the Mideast
Marketing Area, or from the Hearing
Clerk, United States Department of
Agriculture, STOP 9200—Room 1031,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Washington, DC 20250–9200, or may be
inspected there.
Copies of the transcript of testimony
taken at the hearing will not be available
for distribution through the Hearing
Clerk’s Office. If you wish to purchase
a copy, arrangements may be made with
the reporter at the hearing. Copies of the
transcript will also be made available
online at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
dairy.
From the time that a hearing notice is
issued and until the issuance of a final
decision in a proceeding, Department
employees involved in the decisionmaking process are prohibited from
discussing the merits of the hearing
issues on an ex parte basis with any
person having an interest in the
proceeding. For this particular
proceeding, the prohibition applies to
employees in the following
organizational units:
Office of the Secretary of Agriculture,
Office of the Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service, Office of the General
Counsel, Dairy Programs, Agricultural
Marketing Service (Washington Office)
and the Offices of all Market
Administrators.
Procedural matters are not subject to
the above prohibition and may be
discussed at any time.
17:33 Sep 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
The Department of Energy
received a petition from the National
Electrical Manufacturers Association
requesting the initiation of a rulemaking
to exclude from coverage under Energy
Policy and Conservation Act standards
120 volt, 100 watt, R20 short (having a
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
55609
maximum overall length of 35⁄8 or 3.625
inches) incandescent reflector lamps
marketed for use in hot tub spas. DOE
published this petition and a request for
comments in the Federal Register on
December 23, 2010. Based upon its
evaluation of the petition and careful
consideration of the public comments,
DOE has decided to grant this petition
for rulemaking. DOE seeks comments
that will inform its rulemaking to
determine whether 120 volt, 100 watt,
R20 short incandescent reflector lamps
should be excluded from energy
conservation standards.
DATES: Written comments on this
document and information requested
must be submitted on or before October
11, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Any comments submitted
must identify the Request for
Information (RFI) for Spa Lamps and
provide Docket Number EERE–2010–
BT–PET–0047 and/or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) 1904–AC57.
Comments may be submitted using any
of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
(2) E-mail: ShortLampsPetition-2010PET-0047@ee.doe.gov. Include docket
number EERE–2010–BT–PET–0047 and/
or RIN 1904–AC57 in the subject line of
the message.
(3) Postal Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards,
U.S. Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Program, Mailstop EE–2J,
1000 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121. If
possible, please submit all items on a
compact disc (CD), in which case it is
not necessary to include printed copies.
(4) Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms.
Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of
Energy, Building Technologies Program,
950 L’Enfant Plaza, SW., Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20024. Telephone:
(202) 586–2945. If possible, please
submit all items on a CD, in which case
it is not necessary to include printed
copies.
No telefacsimilies (faxes) will be
accepted.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents, or
comments received, go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://www.
regulations.gov. All documents in the
docket are listed in the https://www.
regulations.gov index. However, not all
documents listed in the index may be
publicly available, such as information
that is exempt from public disclosure.
A link to the docket Web page on the
https://www.regulations.gov site can be
found at: https://www1.eere.energy.gov/
buildings/appliance_standards/
E:\FR\FM\08SEP1.SGM
08SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 174 (Thursday, September 8, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 55608-55609]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-22945]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 55608]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1033
[Docket No. AO-11-0333; AMS-DA-11-0067; DA-11-04]
Milk in the Mideast Marketing Area; Notice of Hearing on Proposed
Amendments to Tentative Marketing Agreement and Order
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of public hearing on proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: A public hearing is being held to consider and take evidence
on a proposal to modify the Pool Plant Definition in the Mideast Milk
Marketing Order.
DATES: The hearing will convene at 8 a.m. on Tuesday, October 4, 2011.
ADDRESSES: The hearing will be held at the Westin Cincinnati Hotel, 21
E 5th Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, (513) 621-7700.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Francis, Director, Order
Formulation and Enforcement Division, USDA/AMS/Dairy Programs, Stop
0231-Room 2971-S, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-
0231, (202) 720-7183, e-mail: William.Francis@ams.usda.gov.
Persons requiring a sign language interpreter or other special
accommodations should contact Paul Huber, Market Administrator, before
the hearing begins at (330) 225-4758 or e-mail: phuber@fmmaclev.com.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This administrative action is governed by
the provisions of sections 556 and 557 of Title 5 of the United States
Code and, therefore, is excluded from the requirements of Executive
Order 12866.
Notice is hereby given of a public hearing to be held at the Westin
Cincinnati Hotel, Cincinnati, Ohio beginning at 8 a.m. on Tuesday,
October 4, 2011, with respect to a proposed amendment to the tentative
marketing agreement and to the order regulating the handling of milk in
the Mideast marketing area.
The hearing is called pursuant to the provisions of the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674) (Act), and the applicable rules of practice and procedure
governing the formulation of marketing agreements and marketing orders
(7 CFR part 900).
The purpose of the hearing is to receive evidence with respect to
the economic and marketing conditions which relate to the proposed
amendments, hereinafter set forth, and any appropriate modifications
thereof, to the tentative marketing agreement and to the order.
Evidence also will be taken to determine whether emergency
marketing conditions exist that would warrant omission of a recommended
decision under the rules of practice and procedure (7 CFR 900.12(d))
with respect to any proposed amendments.
Actions under the Federal milk order program are subject to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612) (RFA). The RFA seeks to
ensure that, within the statutory authority of a program, the
regulatory and information collection requirements are tailored to the
size and nature of small businesses. For the purpose of the RFA, a
dairy farm is a ``small business'' if it has an annual gross revenue of
less than $750,000, and a dairy products manufacturer is a ``small
business'' if it has fewer than 500 employees (13 CFR 121.201). Most
parties subject to a milk order are considered as a small business.
Accordingly, interested parties are invited to present evidence on the
probable regulatory and informational impact of the hearing proposals
on small businesses. Also, parties may suggest modifications of these
proposals for the purpose of tailoring their applicability to small
businesses.
The amendments to the rules proposed herein have been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. They are not
intended to have a retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 8c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may request modification or
exemption from such order by filing with the Department of Agriculture
(USDA) a petition stating that the order, any provision of the order,
or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in
accordance with the law. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a
hearing on the petition. After a hearing, the USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States
in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, has its
principal place of business, has jurisdiction in equity to review the
USDA's ruling on the petition, provided a bill in equity is filed not
later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
Interested parties who wish to introduce exhibits should provide
the Administrative Law Judge at the hearing with (4) copies of such
exhibits for the Official Record. Additional copies should be made
available for use by other hearing participants. Any party that has
submitted a proposal notice herein, when participating as a witness, is
required to make their testimony--if prepared as an exhibit--and any
other exhibits, available to USDA officials prior to the start of the
hearing on the day of their appearance. Individual dairy farmers are
not subject to this requirement.
The hearing will continue until such time as determined to have
ended by the presiding Administrative Law Judge. If necessary, the
schedule for the next session will be announced at the time of
adjournment. Such reconvening date and time will also be posted on the
AMS-Dairy Programs Web site at: http:[sol][sol]www.ams.usda.gov/dairy.
The proposed amendments, as set forth below, have not received the
approval of the Department.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1033
Milk marketing orders.
The authority citations for 7 CFR part 1033 read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674, and 7253.
[[Page 55609]]
Proposed by Foremost Farms USA Cooperative, Inc.; National Farmers
Organization, Inc.; Dairy Farmers of America, Inc.; Michigan Milk
Producers Association; Dairylea Cooperative, Inc.; and Continental
Dairy Products, Inc.
Proposal 1
This proposal seeks to alter the definition of a pool distributing
plant within the Mideast Milk Marketing Order. Specifically, the
proposal recommends that a distributing plant, which is physically
located within the Mideast Milk Marketing Order, be regulated by that
order if half of its total route disposition is within Federal Milk
Marketing Area boundaries and its sales patterns are such that no one
Order has more than 25% of its sales volume. This proposed change would
only affect the Mideast Milk Marketing Order.
1. Amend Sec. 1033.7 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 1033.7 Pool plant
* * * * *
(a) A distributing plant, other than a plant qualified as a pool
plant pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section or Sec. --------.7(b)
of any other Federal milk order, from which during the month 30 percent
or more of the total quantity of fluid milk products physically
received at the plant (excluding concentrated milk received from
another plant by agreement for other than Class I use) are disposed of
as route disposition or are transferred in the form of packaged fluid
milk products to other distributing plants. At least 25 percent of such
route disposition and transfers must be to outlets in the marketing
area. Plants located within the marketing area with combined route
disposition and transfers of at least 50% into Federal Order marketing
areas but without 25% of route disposition and transfers into any one
Federal Order will be regulated as a distributing plant in this Order.
* * * * *
Proposed by Dairy Programs, Agricultural Marketing Service
Proposal 2
Make such changes as may be necessary to make the entire marketing
agreement and the order conform with any amendments thereto that may
result from this hearing.
Copies of this notice of hearing and the order may be procured from
the Market Administrator of the Mideast Marketing Area, or from the
Hearing Clerk, United States Department of Agriculture, STOP 9200--Room
1031, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-9200, or may
be inspected there.
Copies of the transcript of testimony taken at the hearing will not
be available for distribution through the Hearing Clerk's Office. If
you wish to purchase a copy, arrangements may be made with the reporter
at the hearing. Copies of the transcript will also be made available
online at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/dairy.
From the time that a hearing notice is issued and until the
issuance of a final decision in a proceeding, Department employees
involved in the decision-making process are prohibited from discussing
the merits of the hearing issues on an ex parte basis with any person
having an interest in the proceeding. For this particular proceeding,
the prohibition applies to employees in the following organizational
units:
Office of the Secretary of Agriculture, Office of the
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service, Office of the General
Counsel, Dairy Programs, Agricultural Marketing Service (Washington
Office) and the Offices of all Market Administrators.
Procedural matters are not subject to the above prohibition and may
be discussed at any time.
Dated: September 2, 2011.
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011-22945 Filed 9-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P