Implementation of Form 990, 55746-55772 [2011-22614]

Download as PDF 55746 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Parts 1 and 602 [TD 9549] RIN 1545–BH28 Implementation of Form 990 Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Final regulations and removal of temporary regulations. AGENCY: This document contains final regulations necessary to implement the redesigned Form 990, ‘‘Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax.’’ These final regulations make revisions to the regulations to allow for new threshold amounts for reporting compensation, to require that compensation be reported on a calendar year basis, and to modify the scope of organizations subject to information reporting requirements upon a substantial contraction. The final regulations also eliminate the advance ruling process for new organizations, change the public support computation period for publicly supported organizations to five years, consistent with the revised Form 990, and clarify that support must be reported using the organization’s overall method of accounting. All tax-exempt organizations required to file annual information returns are affected by these regulations. DATES: Effective Date: These regulations are effective on September 8, 2011. Applicability Date: For dates of applicability, see §§ 1.170A–9(k), 1.507– 2(f), 1.509(a)–3(o), 1.6033–2(k), and 1.6043–3(e). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terri Harris at (202) 622–6070 (not a toll-free number). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES SUMMARY: Paperwork Reduction Act The collection of information contained in these final regulations has been reviewed and approved by the Office of Management and Budget in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) under control number 1545– 2117. The estimated annual burden per recordkeeper will vary, depending on individual circumstances. The collection of information in this final regulation is in § 1.6033–2. The information collected under § 1.6033–2 relates to compensation reporting by tax-exempt organizations. The information that is required to be VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:44 Sep 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 collected for purposes of § 1.6033–2 is required to be submitted on Form 990, ‘‘Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax.’’ For further information concerning this collection of information and the burden associated with the Form 990, or where to submit comments on this collection of information and the accuracy of the estimated burden, please refer to the instructions of the Form 990. The total annual reporting burden associated with this document is one hour. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid control number assigned by the Office of Management and Budget. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103. for the 2008 tax year (returns filed in 2009). On September 9, 2008, the IRS and the Treasury Department issued final and temporary regulations under sections 170(b), 507, 509(a), 6033, and 6043 necessary to implement the redesigned Form 990, ‘‘Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax,’’ (TD 9423) in the Federal Register (73 FR 52528). Also on September 9, 2008, the IRS and the Treasury Department issued a notice of proposed rulemaking crossreferencing those Temporary Regulations and inviting public comment and requests for a public hearing (REG–142333–07) in the Federal Register (73 FR 52218). The IRS did not receive any requests for a public hearing. The IRS received one written comment responding to this notice. After consideration of the comment, the proposed regulations are revised and published in final form substantially as proposed. The major areas of comment and revision are discussed in the following Explanation of Provisions. Background Form 990 Summary of Comments and Explanation of Provisions Under section 6033 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code), organizations that are exempt from Federal income tax under section 501(a) are generally required to file an annual information return reporting gross income, receipts, disbursements, and such other information as the IRS requires. Certain exceptions to this filing requirement apply. For example, churches are not required to file annual information returns. The Treasury regulations direct that the annual information return shall be filed on Form 990, ‘‘Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax’’ or Form 990–PF, ‘‘Return of Private Foundation or Section 4947(a)(1) Nonexempt Charitable Trust Treated as a Private Foundation.’’ The regulations further specify certain information to be reported on the return. The IRS revises forms and instructions on an annual basis to reflect changes in the law and evolving tax administration needs. On December 20, 2007, the IRS released a redesigned Form 990. The Form 990 had not been significantly revised since 1979, and both the IRS and stakeholders regarded the form as needing major revision to keep pace with changes in the law and with the increasing size, diversity, and complexity of the exempt sector. With the exception of certain smaller organizations for which there is a graduated transition period, organizations began using the new form Private Foundation Status and Advance Rulings In its application for recognition of tax-exempt status (Form 1023, ‘‘Application for Recognition of Exemption Under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code’’), a section 501(c)(3) organization also requests a determination of its private foundation status or public charity status, that is, whether it is a private foundation and, if not, the Code provision excepting it from private foundation classification. Under the current statute and prior regulations, an organization could request either an advance ruling or a definitive ruling addressing the organization’s exemption under section 501(c)(3) and its private foundation status under section 509(a). The proposed regulations eliminated the advance ruling process and provided instead that an organization would be a publicly supported organization (thus qualifying for public charity status) in its first five years if it could show, in its application for exemption, that it could reasonably be expected to receive the requisite public support during such period. The comment suggested that the final regulations clarify the process for requesting an updated ruling or determination letter as to public charity status under §§ 1.170A–9(f)(5) and 1.509(a)–3(e). This process is now explained in Rev. Proc. 2011–10, 2011– PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\08SER2.SGM 08SER2 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES 2 IRB 294 and its successors. Thus, the final regulations do not incorporate this suggestion. Computation Period for Public Support The proposed regulations changed the computation period for public support from a four-year period comprised of the four years prior to the taxable year being tested to a five-year period ending with the taxable year being tested. An organization that meets a public support test for a taxable year is treated as publicly supported for that taxable year and the immediately succeeding taxable year. An organization that does not meet a public support test for a taxable year may be at risk of being classified as a private foundation as of the first day of the succeeding taxable year if the organization also fails to meet a public support test for that succeeding taxable year. Because the IRS and the Treasury Department recognized that an organization will not be able to compute its public support for a taxable year under the changed computation period until the subsequent taxable year, the notice of proposed rulemaking requested comments on specific situations that might warrant relief from the imposition of Chapter 42 excise taxes. In addition, organizations that believed that it would be unfair or inequitable to impose the private foundation excise taxes or penalties against them for all or part of the first year in which they were reclassified as private foundations were invited to contact the IRS, Exempt Organizations, Rulings and Agreements, Washington, DC. No organizations contacted the IRS. The comment suggested that the final regulations should treat organizations that fail a public support test for two consecutive years as private foundations as of the beginning of the second test year only for purposes of section 507 (termination of private foundation status) and section 4940 (excise tax on investment income), and that such an organization should not be treated as a private foundation for all other purposes until the beginning of the third consecutive taxable year. The commenter suggested that such a rule was necessary because organizations cannot always predict the amount of support they receive from year-to-year. The comment analogized this suggestion to the rule that previously applied when a new organization reached the end of its five-year advance ruling period. Under the prior regulations, an organization generally was treated as publicly supported until 90 days after the end of the advance ruling period, or, if Form 8734, ‘‘Support Schedule for Advance Ruling Period,’’ was timely VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:44 Sep 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 submitted, until the IRS made a final determination of its status. If an organization failed to qualify as a publicly supported organization, only the section 4940 investment income tax and section 507 termination tax applied for the five-year advance ruling period that had already ended. The reclassified organization and its disqualified persons would be subject to all the Chapter 42 excise taxes applicable to private foundations and disqualified persons only after the end of the 90-day period or when the IRS made a final determination. In response to the comment, the final regulations provide that an organization that fails a public support test for two consecutive taxable years will be treated as a private foundation as of the beginning of the second year of failure only for purposes of sections 507, 4940, and 6033. An organization will be treated as a private foundation for all purposes beginning the first day of the third consecutive taxable year. The comment also suggested adding examples applying the ‘‘facts and circumstances test’’ under § 1.170(A)– 9T(f)(3) or issuing other guidance providing examples of the application of this test. The proposed regulations contained numerous examples reflecting the five-year computation period in §§ 1.170A–9T(f)(9), 1.509(a)–3T(c)(6), and 1.509(a)–3T(e)(3), including several examples illustrating the application of the facts and circumstances test in § 1.170A–9(f)(9). The final regulations retain the examples in the proposed regulations but do not include additional examples, as it was not clear what additional clarification was needed. Method of Accounting Previously, when a section 501(c)(3) organization computed its public support, it was required to use the cash method of accounting to report the amount of public support it received on Schedule A, ‘‘Public Charity Status and Public Support,’’ even if the organization used the accrual method of accounting to keep its books under section 446, and otherwise report on Form 990. Under the proposed regulations, when a section 501(c)(3) organization computed its public support and reported the information on Schedule A, it was required to use the same accounting method that it uses to keep its books under section 446 and that it otherwise uses to report on its Form 990. The comment observed that an organization using the accrual method of accounting to keep its books and to calculate its public support will need to PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 55747 include the present value of a multi-year grant as support in the year in which the grant commitment is received. The commenter suggested that this could deter private foundations from making substantial multi-year grants to an organization due to a concern that the grant could cause the organization to fail the public support test and be reclassified as a private foundation. The comment suggested that the unusual grant rules in the final regulations be expanded to add a new factor giving favorable consideration to certain types of multi-year private foundation grants. Alternatively, the comment suggested that the regulations should permit organizations to elect, for purposes of the public support test, to accrue multiyear grants ratably over the period to which they relate. The final regulations do not incorporate these suggestions. While the requirement to compute public support in accordance with an organization’s normal method of accounting generally is advantageous and less cumbersome for most organizations, the IRS and the Treasury Department recognize that some accrual-method organizations receiving substantial multi-year grants from private foundations and individuals may be concerned that the requirement to account for those multiyear grants on an accrual-method may adversely affect their public charity status. However, the longer, five-year testing period in the proposed and final regulations should mitigate the impact of recognizing a larger amount of support from one source in a single year. In addition, one of the goals of the redesign of the Form 990 was to implement consistent reporting throughout each organization’s Form 990 and financial records in order to reduce an organization’s recordkeeping burden and to increase transparency of an organization’s activities to the general public. In general, use of an organization’s normal method of accounting for calculation of its public support reduces the recordkeeping and reporting burden on accrual-method taxpayers, as they no longer must maintain separate cash method records solely for reporting public support on Schedule A. The revised Form 990, Schedule A, sets forth easier-to-follow rules for calculating public support and captures the information necessary for the organization and the general public to monitor an organization’s compliance with the public support tests. Consistent financial reporting on the basis of an organization’s normal accounting method throughout the organization’s Form 990, including the support test in E:\FR\FM\08SER2.SGM 08SER2 sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES 55748 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations Schedule A, facilitates reconciliation of the Form 990 reporting with an organization’s audited financial statements, increasing the ability of the general public to rely on an organization’s Form 990 as an accurate reflection of the organization’s financial circumstances. Consistent reporting thus assists in the oversight of the charitable community by the general public, as well as by the IRS. Given these considerations, the IRS and the Treasury Department have determined not to adopt the suggested elective change to the accounting method for multi-year grants. The IRS and the Treasury Department also decline to adopt the suggestion that the unusual grant rules be expanded to include multi-year grants. The public support test is designed to ensure that an organization is not funded by a small number of large donors, and IRS and the Treasury Department do not believe it should exclude a large contribution from a single donor simply because it is paid out over a number of years. The fact that a grant is a multi-year grant has historically been taken into consideration in determining whether a particular grant constitutes an unusual grant, at times to the benefit and at times to the detriment of the recipient organization. The unusual grant exclusion generally applies to substantial contributions or bequests that (1) Are attracted by the publicly supported nature of the organization, (2) are unusual or unexpected in their amount, and (3) would adversely affect the organization’s public charity status because of their amount. The final regulations in §§ 1.170A–9(f)(6)(ii)(B) and 1.509(a)–3(c)(3)(iii) provide that all pertinent facts and circumstances continue to be taken into consideration when determining whether a particular contribution will be excluded from the support calculation under the unusual grant exclusion, with no single factor being determinative. If an accrual basis organization receives a substantial multi-year grant from a private foundation or individual that, taken along with all other facts and circumstances, would satisfy the standards in §§ 1.170A–9(f)(6) and 1.509(a)–3(c)(3) for treatment as an unusual grant, such a grant generally would be excluded from the computation of public support. An organization may request a private letter ruling pursuant to §§ 1.170A–9(f)(6)(iv) and 1.509(a)–3(c)(5) that a multi-year grant constitutes an unusual grant under §§ 1.170A–9(f)(6)(ii) and 1.509(a)– 3(c)(3), based on all the facts and circumstances. See also Rev. Proc 2011– 4 (2011–1 IRB 123) and its successors. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:44 Sep 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 Additionally, Rev. Proc. 81–7 (1981–1 CB 621), provides guidelines regarding grants and contributions, including multi-year grants to finance capital items, that will be considered unusual grants under §§ 1.170A–9(f)(6)(ii) and 1.509(a)–3(c)(3) and related provisions without a private letter ruling from the IRS. Reliance The proposed regulations provided that donors may rely on an organization’s ruling that the organization is described in sections 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) and 509(a)(1) or in section 509(a)(2) until notice of a change in status is provided to the public (such as by publication in the Internal Revenue Bulletin), unless the donor was responsible for, or aware of, the act or failure to act that results in the organization’s loss of public charity status. The proposed regulations further provided that donors may rely on advance rulings that expire on or after June 9, 2008, until notice of a change in status is provided to the public (such as by publication in the Internal Revenue Bulletin). The comment suggested that the final regulations should incorporate a safe harbor under which a grantor or contributor will not be considered responsible for, or aware of, an act or failure to act that will result in loss of public charity status, such as those set forth in Rev. Proc. 89–23 (1989–1 CB 844) and Rev. Proc. 81–6 (1981–1 CB 620). The IRS and the Treasury Department agree that grantor reliance safe harbors, such as those noted, are still appropriate, but believe that this guidance is more appropriately provided in non-regulatory form, such as revenue procedures. Therefore, the final regulations do not incorporate this suggestion. However, the final regulations do restore, in §§ 1.170A–9(f)(5)(iii) and 1.509–3(e)(2)(ii), language that was inadvertently deleted from the proposed regulations giving limited grantor and donor reliance based on a written statement from the grantee organization. Section 4966 imposes an excise tax on a sponsoring organization of a donor advised fund (DAF) for each taxable distribution it makes from a DAF. Under section 4966(c), a taxable distribution generally is any distribution from a DAF to any natural person, or to any other person if (i) The distribution is for any purpose other than one specified in section 170(c)(2)(B), or (ii) the sponsoring organization maintaining the DAF does not exercise expenditure responsibility with respect to such distribution in accordance with section PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 4945(h). Among other things, a taxable distribution does not include a distribution from a DAF to any organization described in section 170(b)(1)(A) (other than a disqualified supporting organization). Notice 2006–109 (2006–2 C.B. 1121) requested comments on the application of the Pension Protection Act of 2006, Public Law 109–280 (120 Stat. 780 (2006)) (PPA) to DAFs and supporting organizations. Several comments were received requesting that sponsoring organizations of DAFs be allowed to rely on an IRS ruling or determination of an organization’s public charity status for various purposes, including for purposes of determining whether a distribution to an organization would be a taxable distribution under section 4966. The IRS and the Treasury Department agree that reliance relief for sponsoring organizations of DAFs is appropriate. Accordingly, the final regulations provide that, for purposes of section 4966, sponsoring organizations of DAFs may rely on an IRS determination letter or ruling that the organization is described in sections 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) and 509(a)(1) or in section 509(a)(2) to the same extent as other grantors and contributors. The final regulations also allow sponsoring organizations of DAFs to rely on a favorable determination issued to a grantee that a grant is an unusual grant. Private Foundation Termination Section 1.507–2 addresses private foundation terminations under section 507(b). The proposed regulations revised § 1.507–2 to delete references to the four-year computation period and the transition rules related to 12-month terminations that are obsolete. Section 507(b)(1)(B) allows an organization to terminate its private foundation status by meeting the requirements of section 509(a)(1), (a)(2), or (a)(3) (and thus operating as a public charity) for a continuous period of 60 months, provided the organization (1) Prior to commencement of the 60-month period, notifies the Secretary in the manner prescribed by regulations that it is terminating private foundation status, and (2) later establishes to the satisfaction of the Secretary in a manner prescribed by regulations that it operated as a public charity during the 60-month period. The proposed regulations continued to provide that a terminating private foundation could request an advance ruling regarding its public charity status under § 1.507– 2T(d). The proposed regulations also retained the provision requiring terminating private foundations to provide sufficient information to the IRS E:\FR\FM\08SER2.SGM 08SER2 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES within 90 days of the end of the 60month period to allow the IRS to make a determination on public charity status. The comment suggested that the final regulations should simplify the process of terminating private foundation status under § 1.507–2 by eliminating the requirement that an organization file certain information with the IRS within 90 days after completing the 60-month termination period. The comment observed that the IRS eliminated the Form 8734 filing requirement for newlyformed organizations with advance rulings, choosing instead to rely on the information reported on Schedule A to monitor public support. The final regulations do not incorporate this suggestion. In eliminating the advance ruling period and liberalizing the procedures for new organizations, the IRS took into consideration the experiential data indicating the high incidence of qualification for public charity status at the end of the advance ruling period. As stated in the notice of proposed rulemaking, approximately 95 percent of the organizations that received advance rulings later received definitive rulings that they were public charities. The IRS does not have analogous experiential data relating to organizations attempting to terminate private foundation status under section 507(b)(1)(B) to support a similar change in these procedures. In addition, if the organization fails to qualify as a public charity for the entire 60-month period, it will continue to be treated as a private foundation for the entire 60-month period. Thus, unlike a new organization that had an advance ruling as a public charity, an organization terminating its private foundation status continues to be classified as a terminating private foundation during the 60-month period and continues as such until the IRS receives and makes a determination on the organization’s 90-day submission of information following the end of its advance ruling period. Substantial Contributor The term ‘‘substantial contributor,’’ for purposes of Chapter 42, is defined under section 507(d)(2) and § 1.507–6. The comment suggested that, given that a new organization that fails to qualify as publicly supported after its first five years of existence will not be treated as a private foundation for any purpose during its first five years, the final regulations should clarify whether, for purposes of Chapter 42, the identity of substantial contributors to the organization will be determined by taking into account contributions VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:44 Sep 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 received while the organization was a public charity, or only contributions received after the date the organization is reclassified as a private foundation. Because section 1.507–6 is not within the scope of these final regulations, the final regulations do not incorporate this suggestion. Miscellaneous In § 1.170A–9(f), changes were made in the proposed regulation to clarify that the facts and circumstances test described in paragraph (f)(3) takes into account all pertinent facts and circumstances, and not just those listed in paragraph (f)(3)(iii); additional conforming changes were made in the final regulations. In § 1.507–2, language inadvertently added to the proposed regulation when clarifying the factors for determining whether a grantee organization has an independent governing body was deleted. In addition, the final regulations include language conforming § 1.6033–2(g) to the changes made to section 6033(a)(3)(B) of the Code under the PPA. Since the date of enactment of the PPA, August 17, 2006, the Commissioner’s discretionary authority to relieve organizations from the annual filing requirement under section 6033(a) has not applied to supporting organizations described in section 509(a)(3) of the Code. Section 1.6033– 2(g)(6), which provides the general statement of the Commissioner’s discretionary authority to relieve organizations from the annual filing requirement under section 6033(a), has been corrected to include the modifying language provided by the PPA in section 6033(a)(3)(B). Sections 1.6033– 2(g)(1)(iii) and 1.6033–2(g)(1)(iv) have been amended to include conforming changes. Several other incidental changes were made throughout the final regulations in order to increase clarity and consistency, none of which modify the substance of the proposed regulations. Additionally, the final regulations include a correction in § 1.6033–2(i) to the place to which an organization’s change of operation notifications is sent. Effective/Applicability Date and Transition Rules These final regulations generally are effective on September 8, 2011, and generally apply to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2008. All organizations, including organizations that received a definitive ruling prior to the effective date of these regulations, must use the new five-year computation period to calculate public support for their first taxable year PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 55749 beginning on or after January 1, 2008, and for all subsequent taxable years. Special Analyses It has been determined that this Treasury decision is not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866, as supplemented by Executive Order 13565. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It has also been determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply. It is hereby certified that the collection of information in this regulation will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This certification is based on the fact that burden on tax-exempt entities will be reduced by (1) Eliminating the separate advance ruling process and the additional process for subsequently seeking a definitive ruling, (2) clarifying rules regarding the method of accounting and period for reporting certain items, and (3) providing discretion for the IRS to narrow or clarify circumstances under which reporting is required. Accordingly, a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) is not required. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, these regulations have been submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on its impact on small business. Statement of Availability for Documents Published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin For copies of recently issued revenue procedures, revenue rulings, notices and other guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin or Cumulative Bulletin please visit the IRS Web site at https://www.irs.gov. Drafting Information The principal author of this regulation is Terri Harris, Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities). However, other personnel from the IRS and the Treasury Department participated in their development. List of Subjects 26 CFR Part 1 Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. 26 CFR Part 602 Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. E:\FR\FM\08SER2.SGM 08SER2 55750 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations Amendments to the Regulations Accordingly, 26 CFR parts 1 and 602 are amended as follows: PART 1—INCOME TAXES Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in part as follows: ■ Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * * Par. 2. Section1.170A–9 is amended by revising paragraphs (f) and (k) to read as follows: ■ § 1.170A–9 Definition of section 170(b)(1)(A) organization. sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES * * * * * (f) Definition of section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) organization—(1) In general. An organization is described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) if it— (i) Is referred to in section 170(c)(2) (other than an organization specifically described in paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section); and (ii) Normally receives a substantial part of its support from a governmental unit referred to in section 170(c)(1) or from direct or indirect contributions from the general public (‘‘publicly supported’’). For purposes of this paragraph (f), an organization is publicly supported if it meets the requirements of either paragraph (f)(2) of this section (331⁄3 percent support test) or paragraph (f)(3) of this section (facts and circumstances test). Paragraph (f)(4) of this section defines ‘‘normally’’ for purposes of the 331⁄3 percent support test and the facts and circumstances test, and for new organizations in the first five years of the organization’s existence as a section 501(c)(3) organization. Paragraph (f)(5) of this section provides for determinations of foundation classification and rules for reliance by donors and contributors. Paragraphs (f)(6), (f)(7), and (f)(8) of this section list the items that are included and excluded from the term support. Paragraph (f)(9) of this section provides examples of the application of this paragraph. Types of organizations that, subject to the provisions of this paragraph (f), generally qualify under section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) as ‘‘publicly supported’’ are publicly or governmentally supported museums of history, art, or science, libraries, community centers to promote the arts, organizations providing facilities for the support of an opera, symphony orchestra, ballet, or repertory drama or for some other direct service to the general public. (2) Determination whether an organization is ‘‘publicly supported’’; 331⁄3 percent support test. An VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:44 Sep 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 organization is publicly supported if the total amount of support (see paragraphs (f)(6), (f)(7), and (f)(8) of this section) that the organization normally (see paragraph (f)(4)(i) of this section) receives from governmental units referred to in section 170(c)(1), from contributions made directly or indirectly by the general public, or from a combination of these sources, equals at least 331⁄3 percent of the total support normally received by the organization. See paragraph (f)(9), Example 1 of this section. (3) Determination whether an organization is ‘‘publicly supported’’; facts and circumstances test. Even if an organization fails to meet the 331⁄3 percent support test described in paragraph (f)(2) of this section, it is publicly supported if it normally (see paragraph (f)(4)(i) of this section) receives a substantial part of its support from governmental units, from contributions made directly or indirectly by the general public, or from a combination of these sources, and meets the other requirements of this paragraph (f)(3). In order to satisfy the facts and circumstances test, an organization must meet the requirements of paragraphs (f)(3)(i) and (f)(3)(ii) of this section. In addition, the organization must be in the nature of an organization that is publicly supported, taking into account all pertinent facts and circumstances, including the factors listed in paragraphs (f)(3)(iii)(A) through (f)(3)(iii)(E) of this section. (i) Ten-percent support limitation. The percentage of support (see paragraphs (f)(6), (f)(7) and (f)(8) of this section) normally received by an organization from governmental units, from contributions made directly or indirectly by the general public, or from a combination of these sources, must be substantial. For purposes of this paragraph (f)(3), an organization will not be treated as normally receiving a substantial amount of governmental or public support unless the total amount of governmental and public support normally received equals at least 10 percent of the total support normally received by such organization. (ii) Attraction of public support. An organization must be so organized and operated as to attract new and additional public or governmental support on a continuous basis. An organization will be considered to meet this requirement if it maintains a continuous and bona fide program for solicitation of funds from the general public, community, or membership group involved, or if it carries on activities designed to attract support from governmental units or other PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 organizations described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(i) through (b)(1)(A)(vi). In determining whether an organization maintains a continuous and bona fide program for solicitation of funds from the general public or community, consideration will be given to whether the scope of its fundraising activities is reasonable in light of its charitable activities. Consideration will also be given to the fact that an organization, in its early years of existence, may limit the scope of its solicitation to persons deemed most likely to provide seed money in an amount sufficient to enable it to commence its charitable activities and expand its solicitation program. (iii) In addition to the requirements set forth in paragraphs (f)(3)(i) and (f)(3)(ii) of this section that must be satisfied, all pertinent facts and circumstances, including the following factors, will be taken into consideration in determining whether an organization is ‘‘publicly supported’’ within the meaning of paragraph (f)(1) of this section. However, an organization is not generally required to satisfy all of the factors in paragraphs (f)(3)(iii)(A) through (f)(3)(iii)(E) of this section. The factors relevant to each case and the weight accorded to any one of them may differ depending upon the nature and purpose of the organization and the length of time it has been in existence. (A) Percentage of financial support. The percentage of support received by an organization from public or governmental sources will be taken into consideration in determining whether an organization is ‘‘publicly supported.’’ The higher the percentage of support above the 10 percent requirement of paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section from public or governmental sources, the lesser will be the burden of establishing the publicly supported nature of the organization through other factors, including those described in this paragraph (f)(3), while the lower the percentage, the greater will be the burden. If the percentage of the organization’s support from public or governmental sources is low because it receives a high percentage of its total support from investment income on its endowment funds, such fact will be treated as evidence of an organization being ‘‘publicly supported’’ if such endowment funds were originally contributed by a governmental unit or by the general public. However, if such endowment funds were originally contributed by a few individuals or members of their families, such fact will increase the burden on the organization of establishing that it is ‘‘publicly supported’’ taking into account all pertinent facts and circumstances, E:\FR\FM\08SER2.SGM 08SER2 sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations including the other factors described in paragraph (f)(3)(iii) of this section. (B) Sources of support. The fact that an organization meets the requirement of paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section through support from governmental units or directly or indirectly from a representative number of persons, rather than receiving almost all of its support from the members of a single family, will be considered evidence of an organization being ‘‘publicly supported.’’ In determining what is a ‘‘representative number of persons,’’ consideration will be given to the type of organization involved, the length of time it has been in existence, and whether it limits its activities to a particular community or region or to a special field which can be expected to appeal to a limited number of persons. (C) Representative governing body. The fact that an organization has a governing body which represents the broad interests of the public, rather than the personal or private interests of a limited number of donors (or persons standing in a relationship to such donors which is described in section 4946(a)(1)(C) through (a)(1)(G)), will be considered evidence of an organization being ‘‘publicly supported.’’ An organization will be treated as having a representative governing body if it has a governing body (whether designated in the organization’s governing instrument or bylaws as a Board of Directors, Board of Trustees, or similar governing body) which is comprised of public officials acting in their capacities as such; of individuals selected by public officials acting in their capacities as such; of persons having special knowledge or expertise in the particular field or discipline in which the organization is operating; of community leaders, such as elected or appointed officials, clergymen, educators, civic leaders, or other such persons representing a broad cross-section of the views and interests of the community; or, in the case of a membership organization, of individuals elected pursuant to the organization’s governing instrument or bylaws by a broadly based membership. (D) Availability of public facilities or services; public participation in programs or policies. (1) The fact that an organization generally provides facilities or services directly for the benefit of the general public on a continuing basis (such as a museum or library which holds open its building or facilities to the public, a symphony orchestra which gives public performances, a conservation organization which provides educational services to the public VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:44 Sep 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 through the distribution of educational materials, or an old age home which provides domiciliary or nursing services for members of the general public) will be considered evidence that such organization is ‘‘publicly supported.’’ (2) The fact that an organization is an educational or research institution which regularly publishes scholarly studies that are widely used by colleges and universities or by members of the general public will also be considered evidence that such organization is ‘‘publicly supported.’’ (3) The following factors will also be considered evidence that an organization is ‘‘publicly supported’’: (i) The participation in, or sponsorship of, the programs of the organization by members of the public having special knowledge or expertise, public officials, or civic or community leaders. (ii) The maintenance of a definitive program by an organization to accomplish its charitable work in the community, such as combating community deterioration in an economically depressed area that has suffered a major loss of population and jobs. (iii) The receipt of a significant part of its funds from a public charity or governmental agency to which it is in some way held accountable as a condition of the grant, contract, or contribution. (E) Additional factors pertinent to membership organizations. The following are additional factors to be considered in determining whether a membership organization is ‘‘publicly supported’’: (1) Whether the solicitation for duespaying members is designed to enroll a substantial number of persons in the community or area, or in a particular profession or field of special interest (taking into account the size of the area and the nature of the organization’s activities). (2) Whether membership dues for individual (rather than institutional) members have been fixed at rates designed to make membership available to a broad cross section of the interested public, rather than to restrict membership to a limited number of persons. (3) Whether the activities of the organization will be likely to appeal to persons having some broad common interest or purpose, such as educational activities in the case of alumni associations, musical activities in the case of symphony societies, or civic affairs in the case of parent-teacher associations. See Example 2 through Example 5 contained in paragraph (f)(9) PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 55751 of this section for illustrations of this paragraph (f)(3). (4) Definition of normally; general rule—(i) Normally; 331⁄3 percent support test. An organization ‘‘normally’’ receives the requisite amount of public support and meets the 331⁄3 percent support test for a taxable year and the taxable year immediately succeeding that year, if, for the taxable year being tested and the four taxable years immediately preceding that taxable year, the organization meets the 331⁄3 percent support test on an aggregate basis. (ii) Normally; facts and circumstances test. An organization ‘‘normally’’ receives the requisite amount of public support and meets the facts and circumstances test of paragraph (f)(3) for a taxable year and the taxable year immediately succeeding that year, if, for the taxable year being tested and the four taxable years immediately preceding that taxable year, the organization meets the facts and circumstances test on an aggregate basis. In the case of paragraphs (f)(3)(iii)(A) and (f)(3)(iii)(B) of this section, facts pertinent to years preceding the fiveyear period may also be taken into consideration. The combination of factors set forth in paragraphs (f)(3)(iii)(A) through (f)(3)(iii)(E) of this section that an organization normally must meet does not have to be the same for each five-year period so long as there exists a sufficient combination of factors to show compliance with the facts and circumstances test. (iii) Special rule. The fact that an organization has normally met the requirements of the 331⁄3 percent support test for a current taxable year, but is unable normally to meet such requirements for a succeeding taxable year, will not in itself prevent such organization from meeting the facts and circumstances test for such succeeding taxable year. (iv) Example. The application of paragraphs (f)(4)(i), (f)(4)(ii), and (f)(4)(iii) of this section may be illustrated by the following example: Example. (i) X is recognized as an organization described in section 501(c)(3). On the basis of support received during taxable years 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012, in the aggregate, X receives at least 331⁄3 percent of its support from governmental units referred to in section 170(c)(1), from contributions made directly or indirectly by the general public, or from a combination of these sources. Consequently, X meets the 331⁄3 percent support test for taxable year 2012 (the current taxable year). X also meets the 331⁄3 support test for 2013, as the immediately succeeding taxable year. E:\FR\FM\08SER2.SGM 08SER2 55752 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES (ii) In taxable years 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013, in the aggregate, X does not receive at least 331⁄3 percent of its support from governmental units referred to in section 170(c)(1), from contributions made directly or indirectly by the general public, or from a combination of these sources. However, X still meets the 331⁄3 percent support test for taxable year 2013 based on the aggregate support received for taxable years 2008 through 2012. (iii) In taxable years 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014, in the aggregate, X does not receive at least 331⁄3 percent of its support from governmental units referred to in section 170(c)(1), from contributions made directly or indirectly by the general public, or from a combination of these sources. X does not meet the 331⁄3 percent support test for taxable year 2014. (iv) X meets the facts and circumstances test for taxable year 2013 and for taxable year 2014 (the immediately succeeding taxable year) based on the aggregate support X receives, X’s fundraising program, and consideration of other factors, including those listed in paragraphs (f)(3)(iii)(A) through (f)(3)(iii)(E) of this section, during taxable years 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013. Therefore, even though X does not meet the 331⁄3 percent support test for taxable year 2014, X is still an organization described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) for that year. (v) Normally; first five years of an organization’s existence. (A) An organization ‘‘normally’’ receives the requisite amount of public support and meets the 331⁄3 percent public support test or the facts and circumstances test during its first five taxable years as a section 501(c)(3) organization if the organization can reasonably be expected to meet the requirements of the 331⁄3 percent support test or the facts and circumstances test during that period. With respect to such organization’s sixth taxable year, the general definition of normally set forth in paragraphs (f)(4)(i), (f)(4)(ii), and (f)(4)(iii) of this section apply. Alternatively, the organization shall be treated as ‘‘normally’’ meeting the 331⁄3 percent support test or the facts and circumstances test for its sixth taxable year (but not its seventh taxable year) if it meets the 331⁄3 percent support test or the facts and circumstances test under the definition of normally set forth in paragraphs (f)(4)(i), (f)(4)(ii), and (f)(4)(iii) of this section for its fifth taxable year (based on support received in its first through fifth taxable years). (B) Basic consideration. In determining whether an organization can reasonably be expected (within the meaning of paragraph (f)(4)(v)(A) of this section) to meet the requirements of the 331⁄3 percent support test or the facts and circumstances test during its first five taxable years, the basic consideration is whether its organizational structure, current or VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:44 Sep 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 proposed programs or activities, and actual or intended method of operation are such as can reasonably be expected to attract the type of broadly based support from the general public, public charities, and governmental units that is necessary to meet such tests. The factors that are relevant to this determination, and the weight accorded to each of them, may differ from case to case, depending on the nature and functions of the organization. The information to be considered for this purpose shall consist of all pertinent facts and circumstances, including the factors set forth in paragraph (f)(3) of this section. (vi) Example. The application of paragraph (f)(4)(v) of this section may be illustrated by the following example: Example. (i) Organization Y was formed in January 2008, and uses a taxable year ending December 31. After September 9, 2008, and before December 31, 2008, Organization Y filed Form 1023 requesting recognition of exemption as an organization described in section 501(c)(3) and in sections 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) and 509(a)(1). In its application, Organization Y established that it can reasonably be expected to operate as a publicly supported organization under paragraph (f)(2) or (f)(3) and paragraph (f)(4)(v) of this section. Subsequently, Organization Y received a ruling or determination letter that it is an organization described in section 501(c)(3) and sections 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) and 509(a)(1) effective as of the date of its formation. (ii) Organization Y is described in sections 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) and 509(a)(1) for its first five taxable years (the taxable years ending December 31, 2008, through December 31, 2012). (iii) Organization Y can qualify as a publicly supported organization for the taxable year ending December 31, 2013, if Organization Y can meet the requirements of either paragraph (f)(2) or paragraph (f)(3) of this section or § 1.509(a)–3(a) and § 1.509(a)– (3)(b) for the taxable years ending December 31, 2009, through December 31, 2013, or for the taxable years ending December 31, 2008, through December 31, 2012. (vii) Organizations reclassified as private foundations. (A) New publicly supported organizations. If a new publicly supported organization described under section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) cannot meet the requirements of the 331⁄3 percent test of paragraph (f)(2) or the facts and circumstances test of paragraph (f)(3) for its sixth taxable year under the general definition of normally set forth in paragraphs (f)(4)(i), (f)(4)(ii), and (f)(4)(iii) of this section or under the alternate rule set forth in paragraph (f)(4)(v) of this section (effectively failing to meet a public support test for both its fifth and sixth taxable years), it will be treated as a private foundation as of the first day of its sixth taxable year only for purposes of sections 507, PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 4940, and 6033. Such an organization must file a Form 990–PF, ‘‘Return of Private Foundation or Section 4947(a)(1) Nonexempt Charitable Trust Treated as a Private Foundation,’’ and will be liable for the net investment tax imposed by section 4940 and, if applicable, the private foundation termination tax imposed by section 507(c), for its sixth taxable year. For succeeding taxable years, the organization will be treated as a private foundation for all purposes. (B) Other publicly supported organizations. A publicly supported organization described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) (other than a new publicly supported organization described in paragraph (f)(4)(vii)(A) of this section) that has failed to meet both the 331⁄3 percent support test and the facts and circumstances test for any two consecutive taxable years will be treated as a private foundation as of the first day of the second consecutive taxable year only for purposes of sections 507, 4940, and 6033. Such an organization must file a Form 990–PF, ‘‘Return of Private Foundation or Section 4947(a)(1) Nonexempt Charitable Trust Treated as a Private Foundation,’’ and will be liable for the net investment tax imposed by section 4940 and, if applicable, the private foundation termination tax imposed by section 507(c), for the second consecutive failed taxable year. For succeeding taxable years, the organization will be treated as a private foundation for all purposes. (5) Determinations of foundation classification and reliance. (i) A ruling or determination letter that an organization is described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) may be issued to an organization. Such determination may be made in conjunction with the recognition of the organization’s taxexempt status or at such other time as the organization believes it is described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi). The ruling or determination letter that the organization is described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) may be revoked if, upon examination, the organization has not met the requirements of paragraph (f) of this section. The ruling or determination letter that the organization is described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) also may be revoked if the organization’s application for a ruling or determination contained one or more material misstatements or omissions of fact or if such application was part of a scheme or plan to avoid or evade any provision of the Internal Revenue Code. The revocation of the determination that an organization is described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) does not preclude revocation of the E:\FR\FM\08SER2.SGM 08SER2 sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations determination that the organization is described in section 501(c)(3). (ii) Status of grantors or contributors. For purposes of sections 170, 507, 545(b)(2), 642(c), 4942, 4945, 4966, 2055, 2106(a)(2), and 2522, grantors or contributors may rely upon a determination letter or ruling that an organization is described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) until the IRS publishes notice of a change of status (for example, in the Internal Revenue Bulletin or Publication 78, ‘‘Cumulative List of Organizations described in Section 170(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,’’ which can be searched at https://www.irs.gov.) For this purpose, grantors or contributors also may rely on an advance ruling that expires on or after June 9, 2008. However, a grantor or contributor may not rely on such an advance ruling or any determination letter or ruling if the grantor or contributor was responsible for, or aware of, the act or failure to act that resulted in the organization’s loss of classification under section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) or acquired knowledge that the IRS had given notice to such organization that it would be deleted from such classification. (iii) Reliance by grantors or contributors. A grantor or contributor, other than one of the organization’s founders, creators, or foundation managers (within the meaning of section 4946(b)), will not be considered to be responsible for, or aware of, the act or failure to act that resulted in the loss of the organization’s ‘‘publicly supported’’ classification under section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi), if such grantor or contributor has made such grant or contribution in reliance upon a written statement by the grantee organization that such grant or contribution will not result in the loss of such organization’s classification as a publicly supported organization as described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi). Such statement must be signed by a responsible officer of the grantee organization and must set forth sufficient information, including a summary of the pertinent financial data for the five taxable years immediately preceding the current taxable year, to assure a reasonably prudent person that his grant or contribution will not result in the loss of the grantee organization’s classification as a publicly supported organization as described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi). If a reasonable doubt exists as to the effect of such grant or contribution, or if the grantor or contributor is one of the organization’s founders, creators, or foundation managers, the procedure set forth in paragraph (f)(6)(iv) of this section for requesting a determination from the IRS VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:44 Sep 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 may be followed by the grantee organization for the protection of the grantor or contributor. (6) Definition of support; meaning of general public—(i) In general. In determining whether the 331⁄2 percent support test or the 10 percent support limitation described in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section is met, contributions by an individual, trust, or corporation shall be taken into account as support from direct or indirect contributions from the general public only to the extent that the total amount of the contributions by any such individual, trust, or corporation during the period described in paragraph (f)(4)(i) or paragraph (f)(4)(ii) of this section does not exceed two percent of the organization’s total support for such period, except as provided in paragraph (f)(6)(ii) of this section. Therefore, for example, any contribution by one individual will be included in full in the denominator of the fraction determining the 331⁄2 percent support or the 10 percent support limitation, but will be includible in the numerator of such fraction only to the extent that such amount does not exceed two percent of the denominator. In applying the two percent limitation, all contributions made by a donor and by any person or persons standing in a relationship to the donor that is described in section 4946(a)(1)(C) through (a)(1)(G) and the related regulations shall be treated as made by one person. The two percent limitation shall not apply to support received from governmental units referred to in section 170(c)(1) or to contributions from organizations described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi), except as provided in paragraph (f)(6)(v) of this section. For purposes of paragraphs (f)(2), (f)(3)(i), and (f)(7)(iii)(A)(2) of this section, the term indirect contributions from the general public includes contributions received by the organization from organizations (such as section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) organizations) that normally receive a substantial part of their support from direct contributions from the general public, except as provided in paragraph (f)(6)(v) of this section. See the examples in paragraph (f)(9) of this section for the application of this paragraph (f)(6)(i). For purposes of this paragraph (f), the term contributions includes qualified sponsorship payments (as defined in § 1.513–4) in the form of money or property (but not services). (ii) Exclusion of unusual grants. (A) For purposes of applying the two percent limitation described in paragraph (f)(6)(i) of this section to determine whether the 331⁄3 percent PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 55753 support test or the 10 percent support limitation in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section is satisfied, one or more contributions may be excluded from both the numerator and the denominator of the applicable support fraction if such contributions meet the requirements of paragraph (f)(6)(iii) of this section. The exclusion provided by this paragraph (f)(6)(ii) is generally intended to apply to substantial contributions or bequests from disinterested parties, which contributions or bequests— (1) Are attracted by reason of the publicly supported nature of the organization; (2) Are unusual or unexpected with respect to the amount thereof; and (3) Would, by reason of their size, adversely affect the status of the organization as normally being publicly supported for the applicable period described in paragraph (f)(4) of this section. (B) In the case of a grant (as defined in § 1.509(a)–3(g)) that meets the requirements of this paragraph (f)(6)(ii), if the terms of the granting instrument require that the funds be paid to the recipient organization over a period of years, the grant amounts received by the organization may be excluded for such year or years in which they would otherwise be includible in computing support under the method of accounting on the basis of which the organization regularly computes its income in keeping its books under section 446. However, no item of gross investment income may be excluded under this paragraph (f)(6). The provisions of this paragraph (f)(6) shall apply to exclude unusual grants made during any of the applicable periods described in paragraph (f)(4) or paragraph (f)(6) of this section. See paragraph (f)(6)(iv) of this section as to reliance by a grantee organization upon an unusual grant ruling under this paragraph (f)(6). (iii) Determining factors. In determining whether a particular contribution may be excluded under paragraph (f)(6)(ii) of this section, all pertinent facts and circumstances will be taken into consideration. No single factor will necessarily be determinative. For some of the factors similar to the factors to be considered, see § 1.509(a)– 3(c)(4). (iv) Grantors and contributors. Prior to the making of any grant or contribution that will allegedly meet the requirements for exclusion under paragraph (f)(6)(ii) of this section, a potential grantee organization may request a determination whether such grant or contribution may be so excluded. Requests for such E:\FR\FM\08SER2.SGM 08SER2 sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES 55754 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations determination may be filed by the grantee organization in the time and manner specified by revenue procedure or other guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. The issuance of such determination will be at the sole discretion of the Commissioner. The organization must submit all information necessary to make a determination on the factors referred to in paragraph (f)(6)(iii) of this section. If a favorable determination is issued, such determination may be relied upon by the grantor or contributor of the particular contribution in question for purposes of sections 170, 507, 545(b)(2), 642(c), 4942, 4945, 4966, 2055, 2106(a)(2), and 2522 and by the grantee organization for purposes of paragraph (f)(6)(ii) of this section. (v) Grants from public charities. Pursuant to paragraph (f)(6)(i) of this section, contributions received from a governmental unit or from a section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) organization are not subject to the two percent limitation described in paragraph (f)(6)(i) of this section unless such contributions represent amounts which have been expressly or impliedly earmarked by a donor to such governmental unit or section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) organization as being for, or for the benefit of, the particular organization claiming section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) status. See § 1.509(a)– 3(j)(3) for examples illustrating the rules of this paragraph (f)(6)(v). (7) Definition of support; special rules and meaning of terms—(i) Definition of support. For purposes of this paragraph (f), the term ‘‘support’’ shall be as defined in section 509(d) (without regard to section 509(d)(2)). The term ‘‘support’’ does not include— (A) Any amounts received from the exercise or performance by an organization of its charitable, educational, or other purpose or function constituting the basis for its exemption under section 501(a). In general, such amounts include amounts received from any activity the conduct of which is substantially related to the furtherance of such purpose or function (other than through the production of income); or (B) Contributions of services for which a deduction is not allowable. (ii) For purposes of the 331⁄3 percent support test and the 10 percent support limitation in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, all amounts received that are described in paragraph (f)(7)(i)(A) or paragraph (f)(7)(i)(B) of this section are to be excluded from both the numerator and the denominator of the fractions determining compliance with such tests, except as provided in paragraph (f)(7)(iii) of this section. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:44 Sep 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 (iii) Organizations dependent primarily on gross receipts from related activities. (A) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (f)(7)(i) of this section, an organization will not be treated as satisfying the 331⁄3 percent support test or the 10 percent support limitation in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section if it receives— (1) Almost all of its support (as defined in section 509(d)) from gross receipts from related activities; and (2) An insignificant amount of its support from governmental units (without regard to amounts referred to in paragraph (f)(7)(i)(A) of this section) and contributions made directly or indirectly by the general public. (B) Example. The application of this paragraph (f)(7)(iii) may be illustrated by the following example: Example. Z, an organization described in section 501(c)(3), is controlled by A, its president. Z received $500,000 during the period consisting of the current taxable year and the four immediately preceding taxable years under a contract with the Department of Transportation, pursuant to which Z has engaged in research to improve a particular vehicle used primarily by the Federal government. During this same period, the only other support received by Z consisted of $5,000 in small contributions primarily from Z’s employees and business associates. The $500,000 amount constitutes support under sections 509(d)(2) and 509(a)(2)(A). Under these circumstances, Z meets the conditions of paragraphs (f)(7)(iii)(A)(1) and (f)(7)(iii)(A)(2) of this section and will not be treated as meeting the requirements of either the 331⁄3 percent support test or the facts and circumstances test. As to the rules applicable to organizations that fail to qualify under section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) because of the provisions of this paragraph (f)(7)(iii), see section 509(a)(2) and the related regulations. For the distinction between gross receipts (as referred to in section 509(d)(2)) and gross investment income (as referred to in section 509(d)(4)), see § 1.509(a)–3(m). (iv) Membership fees. For purposes of this paragraph (f)(7), the term support shall include ‘‘membership fees’’ within the meaning of § 1.509(a)–3(h) (that is, if the basic purpose for making a payment is to provide support for the organization rather than to purchase admissions, merchandise, services, or the use of facilities). (8) Support from a governmental unit. (i) For purposes of the 331⁄3 percent support test and the 10 percent support limitation described in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, the term support from a governmental unit includes any amounts received from a governmental unit, including donations or contributions and amounts received in connection with a contract entered into with a governmental unit for the performance of services or in PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 connection with a government research grant. However, such amounts will not constitute support from a governmental unit for such purposes if they constitute amounts received from the exercise or performance of the organization’s exempt functions as provided in paragraph (f)(7)(i)(A) of this section. (ii) For purposes of paragraph (f)(8)(i) of this section, any amount paid by a governmental unit to an organization is not to be treated as received from the exercise or performance of its charitable, educational, or other purpose or function constituting the basis for its exemption under section 501(a) (within the meaning of paragraph (f)(7)(i)(A) of this section) if the purpose of the payment is primarily to enable the organization to provide a service to, or maintain a facility for, the direct benefit of the public (regardless of whether part of the expense of providing such service or facility is paid for by the public), rather than to serve the direct and immediate needs of the payor. For example— (A) Amounts paid for the maintenance of library facilities which are open to the public; (B) Amounts paid under government programs to nursing homes or homes for the aged in order to provide health care or domiciliary services to residents of such facilities; and (C) Amounts paid to child placement or child guidance organizations under government programs for services rendered to children in the community, are considered payments the purpose of which is primarily to enable the recipient organization to provide a service or maintain a facility for the direct benefit of the public, rather than to serve the direct and immediate needs of the payor. Furthermore, any amount received from a governmental unit under circumstances such that the amount would be treated as a ‘‘grant’’ within the meaning of § 1.509(a)–3(g) will generally constitute ‘‘support from a governmental unit’’ described in this paragraph (f)(8), rather than an amount described in paragraph (f)(7)(i)(A) of this section. (9) Examples. The application of paragraphs (f)(1) through (f)(8) of this section may be illustrated by the following examples: Example 1. (i) M is recognized as an organization described in section 501(c)(3). For the years 2008 through 2012 (the applicable period with respect to the taxable year 2012 under paragraph (f)(4) of this section), M received support (as defined in paragraphs (f)(6) through (8) of this section) of $600,000 from the following sources: E:\FR\FM\08SER2.SGM 08SER2 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 55755 Investment income ..................................................................................................................................................................................... City R (a governmental unit described in section 170(c)(1)) ................................................................................................................... United Fund (an organization described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi)) ..................................................................................................... Contributions (including six contributions in excess of the two-percent limit, totaling $170,000) ..................................................... $300,000 40,000 40,000 220,000 Total support ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 600,000 (ii) With respect to the taxable year 2012, M’s public support is computed as follows: Support from a governmental unit described in section 170(c)(1) ......................................................................................................... Indirect contributions from the general public (United Fund) ............................................................................................................... Contributions by various donors that were not in excess of $12,000, or two percent of total support ............................................... Six contributions that were each in excess of $12,000, or two percent of total support, up to the two-percent limitation, 6 × $12,000 .................................................................................................................................................................................................... $40,000 40,000 50,000 Total support ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 202,000 sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES (iii) M’s support from governmental units referred to in section 170(c)(1) and from direct and indirect contributions from the general public (as defined in paragraph (f)(6) of this section) with respect to the taxable year 2012 normally exceeds 331⁄3 percent of M’s total support ($202,000/$600,000 = 33.67 percent) for the applicable period (2008 through 2012). M meets the 331⁄3 percent support test with respect to 2012 and is therefore publicly supported for the taxable years 2012 and 2013. Example 2. (i) N is recognized as an organization described in section 501(c)(3). It was created to maintain public gardens containing botanical specimens and displaying statuary and other art objects. The facilities, works of art, and a large endowment were all contributed by a single contributor. The members of the governing body of the organization are unrelated to its creator. The gardens are open to the public without charge and attract a substantial number of visitors each year. For the current taxable year and the four taxable years immediately preceding the current taxable year, 95 percent of the organization’s total support was received from investment income from its original endowment. N also maintains a membership society that is supported by members of the general public who wish to contribute to the upkeep of the gardens by paying a small annual membership fee. Over the five-year period in question, these fees from the general public constituted the remaining five percent of the organization’s total support for such period. (ii) Under these circumstances, N does not meet the 331⁄3 percent support test for its current taxable year. Furthermore, because only five percent of its total support is, with respect to the current taxable year, normally received from the general public, N does not satisfy the 10 percent support limitation described in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section and therefore does not qualify as publicly supported under the facts and circumstances test. Because N has failed to satisfy the 10 percent support limitation under paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, none of the other requirements or factors set forth in VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:44 Sep 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 paragraphs (f)(3)(iii)(A) through (f)(3)(iii)(E) of this section can be considered in determining whether N qualifies as a publicly supported organization. For its current taxable year, therefore, N is not an organization described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi). Example 3. (i) O, an art museum, is recognized as an organization described in section 501(c)(3). In 1930, O was founded in S City by the members of a single family to collect, preserve, interpret, and display to the public important works of art. O is governed by a Board of Trustees that originally consisted almost entirely of members of the founding family. However, since 1945, members of the founding family or persons standing in a relationship to the members of such family described in section 4946(a)(1)(C) through (G) have annually constituted less than one-fifth of the Board of Trustees. The remaining board members are citizens of S City from a variety of professions and occupations who represent the interests and views of the people of S City in the activities carried on by the organization rather than the personal or private interests of the founding family. O solicits contributions from the general public and, for the current taxable year and each of the four taxable years immediately preceding the current taxable year, O has received total contributions (in small sums of less than $100, none of which exceeds two percent of O’s total support for such period) in excess of $10,000. These contributions from the general public (as defined in paragraph (f)(6) of this section) represent 25 percent of the organization’s total support for such five-year period. For this same period, investment income from several large endowment funds has constituted 75 percent of O’s total support. O expends substantially all of its annual income for its exempt purposes and thus depends upon the funds it annually solicits from the public as well as its investment income in order to carry out its activities on a normal and continuing basis and to acquire new works of art. O has, for the entire period of its existence, been open to the public and more than 300,000 people (from S City and elsewhere) have visited the museum in each of the current taxable year and the four immediately preceding taxable years. PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 72,000 (ii) Under these circumstances, O does not meet the 331⁄3 percent support test for its current year because it has received only 25 percent of its total support for the applicable five-year period from the general public. However, under the facts set forth above, O meets the 10 percent support limitation under paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, as well as the requirements of paragraph (f)(3)(ii) of this section. Under all of the facts set forth in this example, O is considered as meeting the requirements of the facts and circumstances test on the basis of satisfying paragraphs (f)(3)(i) and (f)(3)(ii) of this section and the factors set forth in paragraphs (f)(3)(iii)(A) through (f)(3)(iii)(D) of this section. O is therefore publicly supported for its current taxable year and the immediately succeeding taxable year. Example 4. (i) In 1960, the P Philharmonic Orchestra was organized in T City through the combined efforts of a local music society and a local women’s club to present to the public a wide variety of musical programs intended to foster music appreciation in the community. P is recognized as an organization described in section 501(c)(3). The orchestra is composed of professional musicians who are paid by the association. Twelve performances open to the public are scheduled each year. A small admission fee is charged for each of these performances. In addition, several performances are staged annually without charge. During the current taxable year and the four taxable years immediately preceding the current taxable year, P has received separate contributions of $200,000 each from A and B (not members of a single family) and support of $120,000 from the T Community Chest, a public federated fundraising organization operating in T City. P depends on these funds in order to carry out its activities and will continue to depend on contributions of this type to be made in the future. P has also begun a fundraising campaign in an attempt to expand its activities for the coming years. P is governed by a Board of Directors comprised of five individuals. A faculty member of a local college, the president of a local music society, the head of a local banking institution, a prominent doctor, and a member of the governing body of the local chamber of commerce currently serve on P’s Board and represent the interests and views E:\FR\FM\08SER2.SGM 08SER2 55756 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations of the community in the activities carried on by P. (ii) With respect to P’s current taxable year, P’s sources of support are computed on the basis of the current taxable year and the four taxable years immediately preceding the current taxable year, as follows: Contributions .............................................................................................................................................................................................. Receipts from performances ...................................................................................................................................................................... $520,000 100,000 Total support ....................................................................................................................................................................................... Less: Receipts from performances (excluded under paragraph (f)(7)(i)(A) of this section) ............................................................................ 620,000 Total support for purposes of paragraphs (f)(2) and (f)(3)(i) of this section ................................................................................... 520,000 100,000 (iii) For purposes of paragraphs (f)(2) and (f)(3)(i) of this section, P’s public support is computed as follows: T Community Chest (indirect support from the general public) ............................................................................................................. Two contributions from A & B (each in excess of $10,400—2 percent of total support) 2 × $10,400 ................................................. 120,000 20,800 Total ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 140,800 (iv) Under these circumstances, P does not meet the 331⁄3 percent support test for its current year because it has received only 27 percent of its total support ($140,800/$520,000) for the applicable five-year period from the general public. However, under the facts set forth above, P meets the 10 percent support limitation under paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, as well as the requirements of paragraph (f)(3)(ii) of this section. Under all of the facts set forth in this example, P is considered as meeting the requirements of the facts and circumstances test on the basis of satisfying paragraphs (f)(3)(i) and (f)(3)(ii) of this section and the factors set forth in paragraphs (f)(3)(iii)(A) through (f)(3)(iii)(D) of this section. P is therefore publicly supported for its current taxable year and the immediately succeeding taxable year. Example 5. (i) Q is recognized as an organization described in section 501(c)(3). It is a philanthropic organization founded in 1965 by C for the purpose of making annual contributions to worthy charities. C created Q as a charitable trust by the transfer of appreciated securities worth $500,000 to Q. Pursuant to the trust agreement, C and two other members of his family are the sole trustees of Q and are vested with the right to appoint successor trustees. In each of the current taxable year and the four taxable years immediately preceding the current taxable year, Q received $12,000 in investment income from its original endowment. Each year Q makes a solicitation for funds by operating a charity ball at C’s residence. Guests are invited and requested to make contributions of $100 per couple. During the five-year period at issue, $15,000 was received from the proceeds of these events. C and his family have also made contributions to Q of $25,000 over the fiveyear period at issue. Q makes disbursements each year of substantially all of its net income to the public charities chosen by the trustees. (ii) Q’s sources of support for the current taxable year and the four taxable years immediately preceding the current taxable year as follows: Investment income ..................................................................................................................................................................................... Contributions .............................................................................................................................................................................................. $60,000 40,000 Total support ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 100,000 (iii) For purposes of paragraphs (f)(2) and (f)(3)(i) of this section, Q’s public support is computed as follows: $ 15,000 2,000 Total ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES Contributions from the general public ...................................................................................................................................................... C’s contribution (in excess of $ 2,000—2 percent of total support) 1 × $2,000 ..................................................................................... 17,000 (iv) Under these circumstances, Q does not meet the 331⁄3 percent support test for its current year because it has received only 17 percent of its total support ($17,000/$100,000) for the applicable five-year period from the general public. Thus, Q’s classification as a ‘‘publicly supported’’ organization depends on whether it meets the requirements of the facts and circumstances test. Even though it satisfies the 10 percent support limitation under paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, its method of solicitation VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:44 Sep 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 makes it questionable whether Q satisfies the requirements of paragraph (f)(3)(ii) of this section. Because of its method of operating, Q also has a greater burden of establishing its publicly supported nature under paragraph (f)(3)(iii)(A) of this section. Based upon the foregoing facts and circumstances, including Q’s failure to receive favorable consideration under the factors set forth in paragraphs (f)(3)(iii)(B), (f)(3)(iii)(C), and (f)(3)(iii)(D) of this section, Q does not satisfy the facts and circumstances test. PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 (10) Community trust; introduction. Community trusts have often been established to attract large contributions of a capital or endowment nature for the benefit of a particular community or area, and often such contributions have come initially from a small number of donors. While the community trust generally has a governing body comprised of representatives of the particular community or area, its contributions are often received and maintained in the form of separate trusts or funds, which are subject to varying E:\FR\FM\08SER2.SGM 08SER2 sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations degrees of control by the governing body. To qualify as a ‘‘publicly supported’’ organization, a community trust must meet the 331⁄3 percent support test, or, if it cannot meet that test, be organized and operated so as to attract new and additional public or governmental support on a continuous basis sufficient to meet the facts and circumstances test. Such facts and circumstances test includes a requirement of attraction of public support in paragraph (f)(3)(ii) of this section which, as applied to community trusts, generally will be satisfied if they seek gifts and bequests from a wide range of potential donors in the community or area served, through banks or trust companies, through attorneys or other professional persons, or in other appropriate ways that call attention to the community trust as a potential recipient of gifts and bequests made for the benefit of the community or area served. A community trust is not required to engage in periodic, community-wide, fundraising campaigns directed toward attracting a large number of small contributions in a manner similar to campaigns conducted by a community chest or united fund. Paragraph (f)(11) of this section provides rules for determining the extent to which separate trusts or funds may be treated as component parts of a community trust, fund, or foundation (herein collectively referred to as a ‘‘community trust,’’ and sometimes referred to as an ‘‘organization’’) for purposes of meeting the requirements of this paragraph for classification as a publicly supported organization. Paragraph (f)(12) of this section contains rules for trusts or funds that are prevented from qualifying as component parts of a community trust by paragraph (f)(11) of this section. (11) Community trusts; requirements for treatment as a single entity—(i) General rule. For purposes of sections 170, 501, 507, 508, 509, and Chapter 42, any organization that meets the requirements contained in paragraphs (f)(11)(iii) through (f)(11)(vi) of this section will be treated as a single entity, rather than as an aggregation of separate funds, and except as otherwise provided, all funds associated with such organization (whether a trust, not-forprofit corporation, unincorporated association, or a combination thereof) which meet the requirements of paragraph (f)(11)(ii) of this section will be treated as component parts of such organization. (ii) Component part of a community trust. In order to be treated as a component part of a community trust referred to in this paragraph (f)(11) VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:44 Sep 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 (rather than as a separate trust or notfor-profit corporation or association), a trust or fund: (A) Must be created by a gift, bequest, legacy, devise, or other transfer to a community trust which is treated as a single entity under this paragraph (f)(11); and (B) May not be directly or indirectly subjected by the transferor to any material restriction or condition (within the meaning of § 1.507–2(a)(7)) with respect to the transferred assets. For purposes of this paragraph (f)(11)(ii)(B), if the transferor is not a private foundation, the provisions of § 1.507– 2(a)(7) shall be applied to the trust or fund as if the transferor were a private foundation established and funded by the person establishing the trust or fund and such foundation transferred all its assets to the trust or fund. Any transfer made to a fund or trust which is treated as a component part of a community trust under this paragraph (f)(11)(ii) will be treated as a transfer made ‘‘to’’ a ‘‘publicly supported’’ community trust for purposes of sections 170(b)(1)(A) and 507(b)(1)(A) if such community trust meets the requirements of section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) as a ‘‘publicly supported’’ organization at the time of the transfer, except as provided in paragraph (f)(5)(ii) of this section or §§ 1.508–1(b)(4) and 1.508–1(b)(6) (relating, generally, to reliance by grantors and contributors). See also paragraphs (f)(12)(ii) and (f)(12)(iii) of this section for special provisions relating to split-interest trusts and certain private foundations described in section 170(b)(1)(F)(iii). (iii) Name. The organization must be commonly known as a community trust, fund, foundation, or other similar name conveying the concept of a capital or endowment fund to support charitable activities (within the meaning of section 170(c)(1) or section 170(c)(2)(B)) in the community or area it serves. (iv) Common instrument. All funds of the organization must be subject to a common governing instrument or a master trust or agency agreement (herein referred to as the ‘‘governing instrument’’), which may be embodied in a single document or several documents containing common language. Language in an instrument of transfer to the community trust making a fund subject to the community trust’s governing instrument or master trust or agency agreement will satisfy the requirements of this paragraph (f)(11)(iv). In addition, if a community trust adopts a new governing instrument (or creates a corporation) to put into effect new provisions (applying to future transfers to the community trust), PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 55757 the adoption of such new governing instrument (or creation of a corporation with a governing instrument) which contains common language with the existing governing instrument shall not preclude the community trust from meeting the requirements of this paragraph (f)(11)(iv). (v) Common governing body. (A) The organization must have a common governing body or distribution committee (herein referred to as the ‘‘governing body’’) which either directs or, in the case of a fund designated for specified beneficiaries, monitors the distribution of all of the funds exclusively for charitable purposes (within the meaning of section 170(c)(1) or section 170(c)(2)(B)). For purposes of this paragraph (f)(11)(v), a fund is designated for specified beneficiaries only if no person is left with the discretion to direct the distribution of the fund. (B) Powers of modification and removal. The fact that the exercise of any power described in this paragraph (f)(11)(v)(B) is reviewable by an appropriate State authority will not preclude the community trust from meeting the requirements of this paragraph (f)(11)(v)(B). Except as provided in paragraph (f)(11)(v)(C) of this section, the governing body must have the power in the governing instrument, the instrument of transfer, the resolutions or by-laws of the governing body, a written agreement, or otherwise— (1) To modify any restriction or condition on the distribution of funds for any specified charitable purposes or to specified organizations if in the sole judgment of the governing body (without the necessity of the approval of any participating trustee, custodian, or agent), such restriction or condition becomes, in effect, unnecessary, incapable of fulfillment, or inconsistent with the charitable needs of the community or area served; (2) To replace any participating trustee, custodian, or agent for breach of fiduciary duty under State law; and (3) To replace any participating trustee, custodian, or agent for failure to produce a reasonable (as determined by the governing body) return of net income (within the meaning of paragraph (f)(11)(v)(F) of this section) over a reasonable period of time (as determined by the governing body). (C) Transitional rule—(1) Notwithstanding paragraph (f)(11)(v)(B) of this section, if a community trust meets the requirements of paragraph (f)(11)(v)(C)(3) of this section, then in the case of any instrument of transfer which is executed before July 19, 1977, E:\FR\FM\08SER2.SGM 08SER2 sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES 55758 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations and is not revoked or amended thereafter (with respect to any dispositive provision affecting the transfer to the community trust), and in the case of any instrument of transfer which is irrevocable on January 19, 1982, the governing body must have the power to cause proceedings to be instituted (by request to the appropriate State authority)— (i) To modify any restriction or condition on the distribution of funds for any specified charitable purposes or to specified organizations if in the judgment of the governing body such restriction or condition becomes, in effect, unnecessary, incapable of fulfillment, or inconsistent with the charitable needs of the community or area served; and (ii) To remove any participating trustee, custodian, or agent for breach of fiduciary duty under State law. (2) The necessity for the governing body to obtain the approval of a participating trustee to exercise the powers described in paragraph (f)(11)(v)(C)(1) of this section shall be treated as not preventing the governing body from having such power, unless (and until) such approval has been (or is) requested by the governing body and has been (or is) denied. (3) Paragraph (f)(11)(v)(C)(1) of this section shall not apply unless the community trust meets the requirements of paragraph (f)(11)(v)(B) of this section, with respect to funds other than those under instruments of transfer described in the first sentence of such paragraph (f)(11)(v)(C)(1) of this section, by January 19, 1978, or such later date as the Commissioner may provide for such community trust, and unless the community trust does not, once it so complies, thereafter solicit for funds that will not qualify under the requirements of paragraph (f)(11)(v)(B) of this section. (D) Inconsistent State law—(1) For purposes of paragraphs (f)(11)(v)(B)(1), (f)(11)(v)(B)(2), (f)(11)(v)(B)(3), (f)(11)(v)(C)(1)(i), (f)(11)(v)(C)(1)(ii), and (f)(11)(v)(E) of this section, if a power described in such a provision is inconsistent with State law even if such power were expressly granted to the governing body by the governing instrument and were accepted without limitation under an instrument of transfer, then the community trust will be treated as meeting the requirements of such a provision if it meets such requirements to the fullest extent possible consistent with State law (if such power is or had been so expressly granted). (2) For example, if, under the conditions of paragraph (f)(11)(v)(D)(1) VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:44 Sep 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 of this section, the power to modify is inconsistent with State law, but the power to institute proceedings to modify, if so expressly granted, would be consistent with State law, the community trust will be treated as meeting such requirements to the fullest extent possible if the governing body has the power (in the governing instrument or otherwise) to institute proceedings to modify a condition or restriction. On the other hand, if in such a case the community trust has only the power to cause proceedings to be instituted to modify a condition or restriction, it will not be treated as meeting such requirements to the fullest extent possible. (3) In addition, if, for example, under the conditions of paragraph (f)(11)(v)(D)(1) of this section, the power to modify and the power to institute proceedings to modify a condition or restriction is inconsistent with State law, but the power to cause such proceedings to be instituted would be consistent with State law, if it were expressly granted in the governing instrument and if the approval of the State Attorney General were obtained, then the community trust will be treated as meeting such requirements to the fullest extent possible if it has the power (in the governing instrument or otherwise) to cause such proceedings to be instituted, even if such proceedings can be instituted only with the approval of the State Attorney General. (E) Exercise of powers. The governing body shall (by resolution or otherwise) commit itself to exercise the powers described in paragraphs (f)(11)(v)(B), (f)(11)(v)(C), and (f)(11)(v)(D) of this section in the best interests of the community trust. The governing body will be considered not to be so committed where it has grounds to exercise such a power and fails to exercise it by taking appropriate action. Such appropriate action may include, for example, consulting with the appropriate State authority prior to taking action to replace a participating trustee. (F) Reasonable return. In addition to the requirements of paragraphs (f)(11)(v)(B), (f)(11)(v)(C), (f)(11)(v)(D), or (f)(11)(v)(E) of this section, the governing body shall (by resolution or otherwise) commit itself to obtain information and take other appropriate steps with the view to seeing that each participating trustee, custodian, or agent, with respect to each restricted trust or fund that is, and with respect to the aggregate of the unrestricted trusts or funds that are, a component part of the community trust, administers such trust or fund in accordance with the PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 terms of its governing instrument and accepted standards of fiduciary conduct to produce a reasonable return of net income (or appreciation where not inconsistent with the community trust’s need for current income), with due regard to safety of principal, in furtherance of the exempt purposes of the community trust (except for assets held for the active conduct of the community trust’s exempt activities). In the case of a low return of net income (and, where appropriate, appreciation), the IRS will examine carefully whether the governing body has, in fact, committed itself to take the appropriate steps. For purposes of this paragraph (f)(11)(v)(F), any income that has been designated by the donor of the gift or bequest to which such income is attributable as being available only for the use or benefit of a broad charitable purpose, such as the encouragement of higher education or the promotion of better health care in the community, will be treated as unrestricted. However, any income that has been designated for the use or benefit of a named charitable organization or agency or for the use or benefit of a particular class of charitable organizations or agencies, the members of which are readily ascertainable and are less than five in number, will be treated as restricted. (vi) Common reports. The organization must prepare periodic financial reports treating all of the funds which are held by the community trust, either directly or in component parts, as funds of the organization. (12) Community trusts; treatment of trusts and not-for-profit corporations and associations not included as components. (i) For purposes of sections 170, 501, 507, 508, 509, and Chapter 42, any trust or not-for-profit corporation or association that is alleged to be a component part of a community trust, but that fails to meet the requirements of paragraph (f)(11)(ii) of this section, shall not be treated as a component part of a community trust and, if a trust, shall be treated as a separate trust and be subject to the provisions of section 501, section 4947(a)(1), or section 4947(a)(2), as the case may be. If such organization is a not-for-profit corporation or association, it will be treated as a separate entity, and, if it is described in section 501(c)(3), it will be treated as a private foundation unless it is described in section 509(a)(1), section 509(a)(2), section 509(a)(3), or section 509(a)(4). In the case of a fund that is ultimately treated as not being a component part of a community trust pursuant to this paragraph (f)(12), if the Forms 990 filed annually by the community trust included financial E:\FR\FM\08SER2.SGM 08SER2 sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations information with respect to such fund and treated such fund in the same manner as other component parts thereof, such returns filed by the community trust prior to the taxable year in which the Commissioner notifies such fund that it will not be treated as a component part will be treated as its separate return for purpose of Subchapter A of Chapter 61 of Subtitle F, and the first such return filed by the community trust will be treated as the notification required of the separate entity for purposes of section 508(a). (ii) If a transfer is made in trust to a community trust to make income or other payments for a period of a life or lives in being or a term of years to any individual or for any noncharitable purpose, followed by payments to or for the use of the community trust (such as in the case of a charitable remainder annuity trust or a charitable remainder unitrust described in section 664 or a pooled income fund described in section 642(c)(5)), such trust will be treated as a component part of the community trust upon the termination of all intervening noncharitable interests and rights to the actual possession or enjoyment of the property if such trust satisfies the requirements of paragraph (f)(11) of this section at such time. Until such time, the trust will be treated as a separate trust. If a transfer is made in trust to a community trust to make income or other payments to or for the use of the community trust, followed by payments to any individual or for any noncharitable purpose, such trust will be treated as a separate trust rather than as a component part of the community trust. See section 4947(a)(2) and the related regulations for the treatment of such split-interest trusts. The provisions of this paragraph (f)(12)(ii) provide rules only for determining when a charitable remainder trust or pooled income fund may be treated as a component part of a community trust and are not intended to preclude a community trust from maintaining a charitable remainder trust or pooled income fund. For purposes of grantors and contributors, a pooled income fund of a publicly supported community trust shall be treated no differently than a pooled income fund of any other publicly supported organization. (iii) An organization described in section 170(b)(1)(F)(iii) will not ordinarily satisfy the requirements of paragraph (f)(11)(ii) of this section because of the unqualified right of the donor to designate the recipients of the income and principal of the trust. Such organization will therefore ordinarily be treated as other than a component part of a community trust under paragraph VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:44 Sep 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 (f)(12)(i) of this section. However, see section 170(b)(1)(F)(iii) and the related regulations with respect to the treatment of contributions to such organizations. (13) Method of accounting. For purposes of section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi), an organization’s support will be determined under the method of accounting on the basis of which the organization regularly computes its income in keeping its books under section 446. For example, if a grantor makes a grant to an organization payable over a term of years, such grant will be includible in the support fraction of the grantee organization under the method of accounting on the basis of which the grantee organization regularly computes its income in keeping its books under section 446. (14) Transition rules. (i) An organization that received an advance ruling, that expires on or after June 9, 2008, that it will be treated as an organization described in sections 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) and 509(a)(1) will be treated as meeting the requirements of paragraph (f)(2) or paragraph (f)(3) of this section for the first five taxable years of its existence as a section 501(c)(3) organization unless the IRS issued to the organization a proposed determination prior to September 9, 2008, that the organization is not described in sections 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) and 509(a)(1) or in section 509(a)(2). (ii) Paragraph (f)(4)(v) of this section shall not apply with respect to an organization that received an advance ruling that expired prior to June 9, 2008, and that did not timely file with the Internal Revenue Service the required information to establish that it is an organization described in sections 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) and 509(a)(1) or in section 509(a)(2). (iii) An organization that fails to meet a public support test for its first taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2008, under the regulations in this section may use the prior tests set forth in § 1.170A–9(e)(2) or § 1.170A–9(e)(3), or in §§ 1.509(a)–3(a)(2) and 1.509(a)– 3(a)(3), as in effect before September 9, 2008 (as contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised April 1, 2008), to determine whether the organization was publicly supported for its 2008 taxable year based on its satisfaction of a public support test for taxable year 2007, computed over the period 2003 through 2006. (iv) Examples. The application of this paragraph (f)(14) may be illustrated by the following examples: Example 1. (i) Organization X was formed in January 2004 and uses a taxable year ending June 30. Organization X received an advance ruling letter that it is recognized as PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 55759 an organization described in section 501(c)(3) effective as of the date of its formation and that it is treated as a publicly supported organization under sections 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) and 509(a)(1) during the five-year advance ruling period that will end on June 30, 2008. This date is on or after June 9, 2008. (ii) Under the transition rule, Organization X is a publicly supported organization described in sections 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) and 509(a)(1) for the taxable years ending June 30, 2004, through June 30, 2008. Organization X does not need to establish within 90 days after June 30, 2008, that it met a public support test under § 1.170A–9(e) or § 1.509(a)–3, as in effect prior to September 9, 2008, (as contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised April 1, 2008), for its advance ruling period. (iii) Organization X can qualify as a publicly supported organization for the taxable year ending June 30, 2009, if Organization X can meet the requirements of paragraph (f)(2) or (f)(3) of this section or §§ 1.509(a)–3(a)(2) and 1.509(a)–3(a)(3) for the taxable years ending June 30, 2005, through June 30, 2009, or for the taxable years ending June 30, 2004, through June 30, 2008. In addition, for its taxable year ending June 30, 2009, Organization X may qualify as a publicly supported organization by availing itself of the transition rule contained in paragraph (f)(14)(iii) of this section, which looks to support received by X in the taxable years ending June 30, 2004, through June 30, 2007. Example 2. (i) Organization Y was formed in January 2000, and uses a taxable year ending December 31. Organization Y received a final determination that it was recognized as tax-exempt under section 501(c)(3) and as a publicly supported organization prior to September 9, 2008. (ii) For taxable year 2008, Organization Y will qualify as publicly supported if it meets the requirements under either paragraph (f)(2) or (f)(3) of this section or §§ 1.509(a)– 3(a)(2) or 1.509(a)–3(a)(3) for the five-year period January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2008. Organization Y will also qualify as publicly supported for taxable year 2008 if it meets the requirements under § 1.170A– 9(e)(2) or § 1.170A–9(e)(3), or under §§ 1.509(a)–3(a)(2) and 1.509(a)–3(a)(3), as in effect prior to September 9, 2008, (as contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised April 1, 2008) for taxable year 2007, using the fouryear period from January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2006. * * * * * (k) Effective/applicability date—(1) In general. These regulations shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1969. (2) Applicability date. The regulations in paragraph (f) of this section shall apply to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2008. For tax years beginning after December 31, 1969, and beginning before January 1, 2008, see § 1.170A–9(e) (as contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised April 1, 2008). § 1.170A–9T ■ [Removed] Par. 3. Section 1.170A–9T is removed. E:\FR\FM\08SER2.SGM 08SER2 55760 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations Par. 4. Section 1.507–2 is revised to read as follows: ■ sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES § 1.507–2 Special rules; transfer to, or operation as, public charity. (a) Transfer to public charities—(1) General rule. Under section 507(b)(1)(A) a private foundation, with respect to which there have not been either willful repeated acts (or failures to act) or a willful and flagrant act (or failure to act) giving rise to liability for tax under Chapter 42, may terminate its private foundation status by distributing all of its net assets to one or more organizations described in section 170(b)(1)(A) (other than in clauses (vii) and (viii)) each of which has been in existence and so described for a continuous period of at least 60 calendar months immediately preceding such distribution. Because section 507(a) does not apply to such a termination, a private foundation which makes such a termination is not required to give the notification described in section 507(a)(1). A private foundation that terminates its private foundation status under section 507(b)(1)(A) does not incur tax under section 507(c) and, therefore, no abatement of such tax under section 507(g) is required. (2) Effect of current ruling. A private foundation seeking to terminate its private foundation status pursuant to section 507(b)(1)(A) may rely on a ruling or determination letter issued to a potential distributee organization that such distributee organization is an organization described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(i), 170(b)(1)(A)(ii), 170(b)(1)(A)(iii), 170(b)(1)(A)(iv), 170(b)(1)(A)(v), or 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) in accordance with the provisions of § 1.509(a)–7. (3) Organizations described in more than one clause of section 170(b)(1)(A). For purposes of this paragraph and section 507(b)(1)(A), the parenthetical term ‘‘other than in clauses (vii) and (viii)’’ shall refer only to an organization that is described only in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vii) or section 170(b)(1)(A) (viii). Thus, an organization described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(i), 170(b)(1)(A)(ii), 170(b)(1)(A)(iii), 170(b)(1)(A)(iv), 170(b)(1)(A)(v), or 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) will not be precluded from being a distributee described in section 507(b)(1)(A) merely because it also appears to meet the description of an organization described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vii) or section 170(b)(1)(A)(viii). (4) Applicability of Chapter 42 to foundations terminating under section 507(b)(1)(A). An organization that terminates its private foundation status VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:44 Sep 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 pursuant to section 507(b)(1)(A) will remain subject to the provisions of Chapter 42 until the distribution of all of its net assets to distributee organizations described in section 507(b)(1)(A) has been completed. (5) Return required from organizations terminating private foundation status under section 507(b)(1)(A)—(i) An organization that terminates its private foundation status under section 507(b)(1)(A) is required to file a return under the provisions of section 6043(b). (ii) An organization that terminates its private foundation status under section 507(b)(1)(A) is not required to comply with section 6104(d) for the taxable year in which such termination occurs. (6) Distribution of net assets. A private foundation will meet the requirement to ‘‘distribute all of its net assets’’ within the meaning of section 507(b)(1)(A) only if it transfers all of its right, title, and interest in and to all of its net assets to one or more organizations referred to in section 507(b)(1)(A). (7) Effect of restrictions and conditions upon distributions of net assets—(i) In general. In order to effectuate a transfer of ‘‘all of its right, title, and interest in and to all of its net assets’’ within the meaning of paragraph (a)(6) of this section, a transferor private foundation may not impose any material restriction or condition that prevents the transferee organization referred to in section 507(b)(1)(A) (herein sometimes referred to as the ‘‘public charity’’) from freely and effectively employing the transferred assets, or the income derived therefrom, in furtherance of its exempt purposes. Whether or not a particular condition or restriction imposed upon a transfer of assets is material (within the meaning of this paragraph (a)(7)) must be determined from all of the facts and circumstances of the transfer. Some of the more significant facts and circumstances to be considered in making such a determination are— (A) Whether the public charity (including a participating trustee, custodian, or agent in the case of a community trust) is the owner in fee of the assets it receives from the private foundation; (B) Whether such assets are to be held and administered by the public charity in a manner consistent with one or more of its exempt purposes; (C) Whether the governing body of the public charity has the ultimate authority and control over such assets, and the income derived therefrom; and (D) Whether, and to what extent, the governing body of the public charity is PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 organized and operated so as to be independent from the transferor. (ii) Independent governing body. As provided in paragraph (a)(7)(i)(D) of this section, one of the more significant facts and circumstances to be considered in making the determination whether a particular condition or restriction imposed upon a transfer of assets is material within the meaning of this paragraph (a)(7) is whether, and the extent to which, the governing body is organized and operated so as to be independent from the transferor. In turn, the determination as to such factor must be determined from all of the facts and circumstances. Some of the more significant facts and circumstances to be considered in making such a determination are— (A) Whether, and to what extent, members of the governing body are comprised of persons selected by the transferor private foundation or disqualified persons with respect thereto or are themselves such disqualified persons; (B) Whether, and to what extent, members of the governing body are selected by public officials acting in their capacities as such; and (C) How long a period of time each member of the governing body may serve in such capacity. In the case of a transfer that is to a community trust, the community trust shall meet this paragraph (a)(7)(ii)(C) if— (1) Its governing body is comprised of members who may serve a period of not more than ten consecutive years; and (2) Upon completion of a period of service (beginning before or after the date of transfer), no member may serve again within a period consisting of the lesser of five years or the number of consecutive years the member has immediately completed serving. (iii) Factors not adversely affecting determination. The presence of some or all of the following factors will not be considered as preventing the transferee ‘‘from freely and effectively employing the transferred assets, or the income derived therefrom, in furtherance of its exempt purposes’’ (within the meaning of paragraph (a)(7)(i) of this section): (A) Name. The fund is given a name or other designation which is the same as or similar to that of the transferor private foundation or otherwise memorializes the creator of the foundation or his family. (B) Purpose. The income and assets of the fund are to be used for a designated purpose or for one or more particular section 509(a)(1), section 509(a)(2), or section 509(a)(3) organization, and such use is consistent with the charitable, educational, or other basis for the E:\FR\FM\08SER2.SGM 08SER2 sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations exempt status of the public charity under section 501(c)(3). (C) Administration. The transferred assets are administered in an identifiable or separate fund, some or all of the principal of which is not to be distributed for a specified period, if the public charity (including a participating trustee, custodian, or agent in the case of a community trust) is the legal and equitable owner of the fund and the governing body exercises ultimate and direct authority and control over such fund, as, for example, a fund to endow a chair at a university or a medical research fund at a hospital. In the case of a community trust, the transferred assets must be administered in or as a component part of the community trust within the meaning of § 1.170A–9(f)(11). (D) Restrictions on disposition. The transferor private foundation transfers property the continued retention of which by the transferee is required by the transferor if such retention is important to the achievement of charitable or other similar purposes in the community because of the peculiar features of such property, as, for example, where a private foundation transfers a woodland preserve which is to be maintained by the public charity as an arboretum for the benefit of the community. Such a restriction does not include a restriction on the disposition of an investment asset or the distribution of income. (iv) Adverse factors. The presence of any of the following factors will be considered as preventing the transferee ‘‘from freely and effectively employing the transferred assets, or the income derived therefrom, in furtherance of its exempt purposes’’ (within the meaning of paragraph (a)(7)(i) of this section): (A) Distributions. (1) With respect to distributions made after April 19, 1977, the transferor private foundation, a disqualified person with respect thereto, or any person or committee designated by, or pursuant to the terms of an agreement with, such a person (hereinafter referred to as donor), reserves the right, directly or indirectly, to name (other than by designation in the instrument of transfer of particular section 509(a)(1), section 509(a)(2), or section 509(a)(3) organizations) the persons to which the transferee public charity must distribute, or to direct the timing of such distributions (other than by direction in the instrument of transfer that some or all of the principal, as opposed to specific assets, not be distributed for a specified period) as, for example, by a power of appointment. The IRS will examine carefully whether the seeking of advice by the transferee from, or the giving of advice by, any VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:44 Sep 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 donor after the assets have been transferred to the transferee constitutes an indirect reservation of a right to direct such distributions. In any such case, the reservation of such a right will be considered to exist where the only criterion considered by the public charity in making a distribution of income or principal from a donor’s fund is advice offered by the donor. Whether there is a reservation of such a right will be determined from all of the facts and circumstances, including, but not limited to, the factors contained in paragraphs (a)(7)(iv)(A)(2) and (a)(7)(iv)(A)(3) of this section. (2) The presence of some or all of the following factors will indicate that the reservation of a right to direct distributions does not exist: (i) There has been an independent investigation by the staff of the public charity evaluating whether the donor’s advice is consistent with specific charitable needs most deserving of support by the public charity (as determined by the public charity). (ii) The public charity has promulgated guidelines enumerating specific charitable needs consistent with the charitable purposes of the public charity and the donor’s advice is consistent with such guidelines. (iii) The public charity has instituted an educational program publicizing to donors and other persons the guidelines enumerating specific charitable needs consistent with the charitable purposes of the public charity. (iv) The public charity distributes funds in excess of amounts distributed from the donor’s fund to the same or similar types of organizations or charitable needs as those recommended by the donor. (v) The public charity’s solicitations (written or oral) for funds specifically state that such public charity will not be bound by advice offered by the donor. (3) The presence of some or all of the following factors will indicate the reservation of a right to direct distributions does exist: (i) The solicitations (written or oral) of funds by the public charity state or imply, or a pattern of conduct on the part of the public charity creates an expectation, that the donor’s advice will be followed. (ii) The advice of a donor (whether or not restricted to a distribution of income or principal from the donor’s trust or fund) is limited to distributions of amounts from the donor’s fund, and the factors described in paragraph (a)(7)(iv)(A)(2)(i) or paragraph (a)(7)(iv)(A)(2)(ii) of this section are not present. PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 55761 (iii) Only the advice of the donor as to distributions of such donor’s fund is solicited by the public charity and no procedure is provided for considering advice from persons other than the donor with respect to such fund. (iv) For the taxable year and all prior taxable years the public charity follows the advice of all donors with respect to their funds substantially all of the time. (B) Other action or withholding of action. The terms of the transfer agreement, or any expressed or implied understanding, required the public charity to take or withhold action with respect to the transferred assets which is not designed to further one or more of the exempt purposes of the public charity, and such action or withholding of action would, if performed by the transferor private foundation with respect to such assets, have subjected the transferor to tax under Chapter 42 (other than with respect to the minimum investment return requirement of section 4942(e)). (C) Assumption of leases, contractual obligations, or liabilities. The public charity assumes leases, contractual obligations, or liabilities of the transferor private foundation, or takes the assets thereof subject to such liabilities (including obligations under commitments or pledges to donees of the transferor private foundation), for purposes inconsistent with the purposes or best interests of the public charity, other than the payment of the transferor’s Chapter 42 taxes incurred prior to the transfer to the public charity to the extent of the value of the assets transferred. (D) Retention of investment assets. The transferee public charity is required by any restriction or agreement (other than a restriction or agreement imposed or required by law or regulatory authority), express or implied, to retain any securities or other investment assets transferred to it by the private foundation. In a case where such transferred assets consistently produce a low annual return of income, the IRS will examine carefully whether the transferee is required by any such restriction or agreement to retain such assets. (E) Right of first refusal. An agreement is entered into in connection with the transfer of securities or other property which grants directly or indirectly to the transferor private foundation or any disqualified person with respect thereto a right of first refusal with respect to the transferred securities or other property when and if disposed of by the public charity, unless such securities or other property was acquired by the transferor E:\FR\FM\08SER2.SGM 08SER2 55762 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES private foundation subject to such right of first refusal prior to October 9, 1969. (F) Relationships. An agreement is entered into between the transferor private foundation and the transferee public charity which establishes irrevocable relationships with respect to the maintenance or management of assets transferred to the public charity, such as continuing relationships with banks, brokerage firms, investment counselors, or other advisors with regard to the investments or other property transferred to the public charity (other than a relationship with a trustee, custodian, or agent for a community trust acting as such). The transfer of property to a public charity subject to contractual obligations which were established prior to November 11, 1976, between the transferor private foundation and persons other than disqualified persons with respect to such foundation will not be treated as prohibited under the preceding sentence, but only if such contractual obligations were not entered into pursuant to a plan to terminate the private foundation status of the transferor under section 507(b)(1)(A) and if the continuation of such contractual obligations is in the best interests of the public charity. (G) Other conditions. Any other condition is imposed on action by the public charity which prevents it from exercising ultimate control over the assets received from the transferor private foundation for purposes consistent with its exempt purposes. (v) Examples. The provisions of this paragraph (a)(7) may be illustrated by the following examples: Example 1. The M Private Foundation transferred all of its net assets to the V Cancer Institute, a public charity described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(iii). Prior to the transfer, M’s activities consisted of making grants to hospitals and universities to further research into the causes of cancer. Under the terms of the transfer, V is required to keep M’s assets in a separate fund and use the income and principal to further cancer research. Although the assets may be used only for a limited purpose, this purpose is consistent with and in furtherance of V’s exempt purposes, and does not prevent the transfer from being a distribution for purposes of section 507(b)(1)(A). Example 2. The N Private Foundation transferred all of its net assets to W University, a public charity described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(ii). Under the terms of the transfer, W is required to use the income and principal to endow a chair at the university to be known as the ‘‘John J. Doe Memorial Professorship,’’ named after N’s creator. Although the transferred assets are to be used for a specified purpose by W, this purpose is in furtherance of W’s exempt educational purposes, and there are no VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:44 Sep 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 conditions on investment or reinvestment of the principal or income. The use of the name of the foundation’s creator for the chair is not a restriction which would prevent the transfer from being a distribution for purposes of section 507(b)(1)(A). Example 3. The O Private Foundation transferred all of its net assets to X Bank as trustee for the Q Community Trust, a community trust that is a public charity described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi). Under the terms of the transfer, X is to hold the assets in trust for Q and is directed to distribute the income annually to the Y Church, a public charity described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(i). The distribution of income to Y Church is consistent with Q’s exempt purposes. If the trust created by this transfer otherwise meets the requirements of § 1.170A–9(f)(11) as a component part of the Q Community Trust, the assets transferred by O to X will be treated as distributed to one or more public charities within the meaning of section 507(b)(1)(A). The direction to distribute the income to Y Church meets the conditions of paragraph (a)(7)(iii)(B) of this section and will therefore not disqualify the transfer under section 507(b)(1)(A). Example 4. (i) The P Private Foundation transferred all of its net assets to Z Bank as trustee for the R Community Trust, a community trust that is a public charity described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi). Under the terms of the transfer, Z is to hold the assets in trust for R and distribute the income to those public charities described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(i) through (b)(1)(A)(vi) that are designated by B, the creator of P. R’s governing body has no authority during B’s lifetime to vary B’s direction. Under the terms of the transfer, it is intended that Z retain the transferred assets in their present form for a period of 20 years, or until the date of B’s death if it occurs before the expiration of such period. Upon the death of B, R will have the power to distribute the income to such public charities as it selects and may dispose of the corpus as it sees fit. (ii) Under paragraph (a)(7)(iv)(A) or paragraph (a)(7)(iv)(D) of this section, as a result of the restrictions imposed with respect to the transferred assets, there has been no distribution of all P’s net assets within the meaning of section 507(b)(1)(A) at the time of the transfer. In addition, P has not transferred its net assets to a component part of R Community Trust, but rather to a separate trust described in § 1.170A–9(f)(12). (b) Operation as a public charity—(1) In general. Under section 507(b)(1)(B), an organization can terminate its private foundation status if the organization— (i) Meets the requirements of section 509(a)(1), section 509(a)(2) or section 509(a)(3) for a continuous period of 60 calendar months beginning with the first day of any taxable year that begins after December 31, 1969; (ii) In compliance with section 507(b)(1)(B)(ii) and paragraph (b)(3) of this section, properly notifies the IRS, in such manner as may be provided by published guidance, publication, form or instructions, before the PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 commencement of such 60-month period, that it is terminating its private foundation status; and (iii) Properly establishes immediately after the expiration of such 60-month period that such organization has complied with the requirements of section 509(a)(1), section 509(a)(2) or section 509(a)(3) during the 60-month period, in the manner described in paragraph (b)(4) of this section. (2) Relationship of section 507(b)(1)(B) to sections 507(a), 507(c), and 507(g). Because section 507(a) does not apply to a termination described in section 507(b)(1)(B), a private foundation’s notification that it is commencing a termination pursuant to section 507(b)(1)(B) will not be treated as a notification described in section 507(a) even if the private foundation does not successfully terminate its private foundation status pursuant to section 507(b)(1)(B). A private foundation that terminates its private foundation status under section 507(b)(1)(B) does not incur tax under section 507(c) and, therefore, no abatement of such tax under section 507(g) is required. (3) Notification of termination. In order to comply with the requirements under section 507(b)(1)(B)(ii), an organization shall before the commencement of the 60-month period under section 507(b)(1)(B)(i) notify the IRS, in such manner as may be provided by published guidance, publication, form or instructions, of its intention to terminate its private foundation status. Such notification shall contain the following information— (i) The name and address of the private foundation; (ii) Its intention to terminate its private foundation status; (iii) The Code section under which it seeks classification (section 509(a)(1), section 509(a)(2) or section 509(a)(3)); (iv) If section 509(a)(1) is applicable, the clause of section 170(b)(1)(A) involved; (v) The date its regular taxable year begins; and (vi) The date of commencement of the 60-month period. (4) Establishment of termination. In order to comply with the requirements under section 507(b)(1)(B)(iii), an organization shall within 90 days after the expiration of the 60-month period file such information with the IRS, in such manner as may be provided by published guidance, publication, form or instructions, as is necessary to make a determination as to the organization’s status as an organization described under section 509(a)(1), section 509(a)(2) or section 509(a)(3) and the E:\FR\FM\08SER2.SGM 08SER2 sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations related regulations. See paragraph (c) of this section as to the information required to be submitted under this paragraph (b)(4). (5) Incomplete information. The failure to supply, within the required time, all of the information required by paragraph (b)(3) or paragraph (b)(4) of this section is not alone sufficient to constitute a failure to satisfy the requirements of section 507(b)(1)(B). If the information that is submitted within the required time is incomplete and the organization supplies the necessary additional information at the request of the Commissioner within the additional time period allowed by him, the original submission will be considered timely. (6) Application of special rules and filing requirements. An organization that has terminated its private foundation status under section 507(b)(1)(B) is not required to comply with the special rules set forth in sections 508(a) and 508(b). Such organization is also not required to file a return under the provisions of section 6043(b) by reason of termination of its private foundation status under the provisions of section 507(b)(1)(B). (7) Extension of time to assess deficiencies. If a private foundation files a notification (described in paragraph (b)(3) of this section) that it intends to begin a 60-month termination pursuant to section 507(b)(1)(B) and does not file a request for an advance ruling pursuant to paragraph (d) of this section, such private foundation may file with the notification described in paragraph (b)(3) of this section a consent under section 6501(c)(4) to the effect that the period of limitation upon assessment under section 4940 for any taxable year within the 60-month termination period shall not expire prior to one year after the date of expiration of the time prescribed by law for the assessment of a deficiency for the last taxable year within the 60-month period. Such consents, if filed, will ordinarily be accepted by the Commissioner. See paragraph (e)(3) of this section for an illustration of the procedure required to obtain a refund of the tax imposed by section 4940 in a case where such a consent is not in effect. (c) Sixty-month terminations—(1) Method of determining normal sources of support. (i) In order to meet the requirements of section 507(b)(1)(B) for the 60-month termination period as a section 509(a)(1) or section 509(a)(2) organization, an organization must meet the requirements of section 509(a)(1) or section 509(a)(2), as the case may be, for a continuous period of at least 60 calendar months. In determining whether an organization seeking status VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:44 Sep 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 under section 509(a)(1) as an organization described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(iv) or section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) or under section 509(a)(2) normally meets the requirements set forth under such sections, support received in taxable years prior to the commencement of the 60-month period shall not be taken into consideration, except as otherwise provided in this section. (ii) For purposes of section 507(b)(1)(B), an organization will be considered to be a section 509(a)(1) organization described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) for a continuous period of 60 calendar months only if the organization satisfies the provisions of § 1.170A–9(f), other than § 1.170A– 9(f)(4)(v), based upon aggregate data for such entire period. The calculation of public support shall be made over the period beginning with the date of the commencement of the 60-month period, and ending with the last day of the 60month period. (iii) For purposes of section 507(b)(1)(B), an organization will be considered to be a section 509(a)(2) organization only if such organization meets the support requirements set forth in sections 509(a)(2)(A) and 509(a)(2)(B) and the related regulations, other than § 1.509(a)–3(d), for the continuous period of 60 calendar months prescribed under section 507(b)(1)(B). The calculation of public support shall be made over the period beginning with the date of the commencement of the 60-month period, and ending with the last day of the 60-month period. (2) Organizational and operational tests. In order to meet the requirements of section 507(b)(1)(B) for the 60-month termination period as an organization described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(i), 170(b)(1)(A)(ii), 170(b)(1)(A)(iii), 170(b)(1)(A)(iv), or 170(b)(1)(A)(v) or section 509(a)(3), as the case may be, an organization must meet the requirements of the applicable provisions for a continuous period of at least 60 calendar months. For purposes of section 507(b)(1)(B), an organization will be considered to be such an organization only if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable provision (including with respect to section 509(a)(3), the organizational and operational test set forth in section 509(a)(3)(A)) at the commencement of such 60-month period and continuously thereafter during such period. (d) Advance rulings for 60-month terminations—(1) In general. An organization that files the notification required by section 507(b)(1)(B)(ii) that it is commencing a 60-month termination may obtain an advance PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 55763 ruling from the Commissioner that it can be expected to satisfy the requirements of section 507(b)(1)(B)(i) during the 60-month period. Such an advance ruling may be issued if the organization can reasonably be expected to meet the requirements of section 507(b)(1)(B)(i) during the 60-month period. The issuance of a ruling will be discretionary with the Commissioner. (2) Basic consideration. In determining whether an organization can reasonably be expected (within the meaning of paragraph (d)(1) of this section) to meet the requirements of section 507(b)(1)(B)(i) for the 60-month period, the basic consideration is whether its organizational structure (taking into account any revisions made prior to the beginning of the 60-month period), current or proposed programs or activities, actual or intended method of operation, and current or projected sources of support are such as to indicate that the organization is likely to satisfy the requirements of section 509(a)(1), section 509(a)(2), or section 509(a)(3) and paragraph (c) of this section during the 60-month period. In making such a determination, all pertinent facts and circumstances shall be considered. (3) Reliance by grantors and contributors. For purposes of sections 170, 545(b)(2), 642(c), 4942, 4945, 4966, 2055, 2106(a)(2), and 2522, grants or contributions to an organization which has obtained a ruling referred to in this paragraph will be treated as made to an organization described in section 509(a)(1), section 509(a)(2), or section 509(a)(3), as the case may be, until the IRS publishes notice that such advance ruling is being revoked (such as by publication in the Internal Revenue Bulletin). However, a grantor or contributor may not rely on such an advance ruling if the grantor or contributor was responsible for, or aware of, the act or failure to act that resulted in the organization’s failure to meet the requirements of section 509(a)(1), section 509(a)(2), or section 509(a)(3), or acquired knowledge that the IRS had given notice to such organization that its advance ruling would be revoked. Prior to the making of any grant or contribution which allegedly will not result in the grantee’s failure to meet the requirements of section 509(a)(1), section 509(a)(2), or section 509(a)(3), a potential grantee organization may request a ruling whether such grant or contribution may be made without such failure. A request for such ruling may be filed by the grantee organization with the IRS. The issuance of such ruling will be at the sole discretion of the Commissioner. E:\FR\FM\08SER2.SGM 08SER2 sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES 55764 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations The organization must submit all information necessary to make a determination on the factors referred to in paragraph (d)(2) of this section. If a favorable ruling is issued, such ruling may be relied upon by the grantor or contributor of the particular contribution in question for purposes of sections 170, 507, 545(b)(2), 642(c), 4942, 4945, 4966, 2055, 2106(a)(2), and 2522. (4) Reliance by organization. An organization obtaining an advance ruling pursuant to this paragraph cannot rely on such a ruling. Consequently, if the organization does not pay the tax imposed by section 4940 for any taxable year or years during the 60-month period, and it is subsequently determined that such tax is due for such year or years (because the organization did not in fact complete a successful termination pursuant to section 507(b)(1)(B) and was not treated as an organization described in section 509(a)(1), section 509(a)(2), or section 509(a)(3) for such year or years), the organization is liable for interest in accordance with section 6601 if any amount of tax under section 4940 has not been paid on or before the last date prescribed for payment. However, because any failure to pay such tax during the 60-month period (or prior to the revocation of such ruling) is due to reasonable cause, the penalty under section 6651 with respect to the tax imposed by section 4940 shall not apply. (5) Extension of time to assess deficiencies. The advance ruling described in paragraph (d)(1) of this section shall be issued only if such organization’s request for an advance ruling is filed with a consent under section 6501(c)(4) to the effect that the period of limitations upon assessment under section 4940 for any taxable year within the advance ruling period shall not expire prior to one year after the date of the expiration of the time prescribed by law for the assessment of a deficiency for the last taxable year within the 60-month period. (e) Effect on grantors or contributors and on the organization itself—(1) Effect of satisfaction of requirements for termination; treatment during the termination period. In the event that an organization satisfies the requirements of section 507(b)(1)(B) for termination of its private foundation status during the continuous 60-month period, such organization shall be treated for such entire 60-month period in the same manner as an organization described in section 509(a)(1), section 509(a)(2), or section 509(a)(3), as the case may be. VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:16 Sep 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 (2) Failure to meet termination requirements—(i) In general. Except as otherwise provided in paragraphs (d) and (e)(2)(ii) of this section, any organization that fails to satisfy the requirements of section 507(b)(1)(B) for termination of its private foundation status during the continuous 60-month period shall be treated as a private foundation for the entire 60-month period, for purposes of sections 507 through 509 and Chapter 42, and grants or contributions to such an organization shall be treated as made to a private foundation for purposes of sections 170, 507(b)(1)(A), 4942, and 4945. (ii) Certain 60-month terminations. Notwithstanding paragraph (e)(2)(i) of this section, if an organization fails to satisfy the requirements of section 509(a)(1), section 509(a)(2), or section 509(a)(3) for the continuous 60-month period but does satisfy the requirements of section 509(a)(1), section 509(a)(2), or section 509(a)(3), as the case may be, for any taxable year or years during such 60-month period, the organization shall be treated as a section 509(a)(1), section 509(a)(2), or section 509(a)(3) organization for such taxable year or years, and grants or contributions made during such taxable year or years shall be treated as made to an organization described in section 509(a)(1), section 509(a)(2), or section 509(a)(3). In addition, sections 507 through 509 and Chapter 42 shall not apply to such organization for any taxable year within such 60-month period for which it does meet such requirements. For purposes of determining whether an organization satisfies the requirements of section 509(a)(1), section 509(a)(2), or section 509(a)(3) for any taxable year in the 60month period, the calculation of public support shall be made over the period beginning with the date of the commencement of the 60-month period, and ending with the last day of the taxable year being tested. The organization shall not be treated as a section 509(a)(1) or section 509(a)(2) organization for any taxable year during the 60-month period solely by reason of having met a public support test for the preceding year. In addition, the transition rules in §§ 1.170–9(f)(14)(iii) and 1.509(a)–3(n)(iii) shall not apply. (iii) Aggregate tax benefit. For purposes of section 507(d), the organization’s aggregate tax benefit resulting from the organization’s section 501(c)(3) status shall continue to be computed from the date from which such computation would have been made, but for the notice filed under section 507(b)(1)(B)(ii), except that any taxable year within such 60-month period for which such organization PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 meets the requirements of section 509(a)(1), section 509(a)(2), or section 509(a)(3) shall be excluded from such computations. (iv) Excess business holdings. See section 4943 and the related regulations for rules relating to decreases in a private foundation’s holdings in a business enterprise which are caused by the foundation’s failure to terminate its private foundation status after giving the notification for termination under section 507(b)(1)(B)(ii). (3) Example. The provisions of this paragraph (e) may be illustrated by the following example: Example 1. Y, a calendar year private foundation, notifies the IRS that it intends to terminate its private foundation status by converting into a publicly supported organization described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) and that its 60-month termination period will commence on January 1, 2010. Y does not obtain a ruling described in paragraph (d) of this section. Based upon its support for 2010, Y does not qualify as a publicly supported organization within the meaning of § 1.170A–9(f) and this paragraph for 2010. Consequently, in order to avoid the risks of penalties and interest if Y fails to terminate within the 60-month period, Y files its 2010 return as a private foundation and pays the tax imposed by section 4940. Because a consent (described in paragraph (b)(7) of this section), which would prevent the period of limitations for all years in the 60-month period from expiring, is not in effect, in order to be able to file a claim for refund, Y and the IRS must agree to extend the period of limitation for all taxes imposed under Chapter 42 for 2010. Based on the aggregate data for the entire 60-month period (2010 through 2014), Y does qualify as a publicly-supported organization for the entire 60-month period. Consequently, Y is treated as a publiclysupported organization for the entire 60month period. Y files a claim for refund for the taxes paid under section 4940 for 2010, and such taxes are refunded. (f) Effective/applicability date—(1) Effective date. These regulations are effective on September 8, 2011. (2) Applicability date. The regulations in this section shall apply to tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2008. For taxable years beginning after December 31, 1969, and beginning before January 1, 2008, see § 1.507–2 (as contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised April 1, 2008). § 1.507–2T [Removed] Par. 5. Section 1.507–2T is removed. Par. 6. Section 1.509(a)–3 is amended as follows: 1. Revising paragraphs (a)(2), (a)(3)(i), (c), (d), (e), (k) and (n). 2. Adding new paragraph (o). The revisions and addition read as follows: ■ ■ E:\FR\FM\08SER2.SGM 08SER2 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES § 1.509(a)–3 Broadly, publicly supported organizations. (a) * * * (2) One-third support test. An organization will meet the one-third support test if it normally (within the meaning of paragraph (c) or paragraph (d) of this section) receives from permitted sources more than one-third of its support in each taxable year from any combination of— (i) Gifts, grants, contributions, or membership fees; and (ii) Gross receipts from admissions, sales of merchandise, performance of services, or furnishing of facilities, in an activity that is not an unrelated trade or business (within the meaning of section 513), subject to certain limitations described in paragraph (b) of this section. For purposes of this section, governmental units, organizations described in section 509(a)(1), and persons other than disqualified persons with respect to the organization shall be referred to as permitted sources. For purposes of this section, the amount of support received from the sources described in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section and this paragraph (a)(2)(ii) (subject to the limitations referred to in this paragraph (a)(2)) will be referred to as the numerator of the one-third support fraction, and the total amount of support received (as defined in section 509(d)) will be referred to as the denominator of the one-third support fraction. Section 1.509(a)–3(f) distinguishes gifts and contributions from gross receipts; § 1.509(a)–3(g) distinguishes grants from gross receipts; § 1.509(a)–3(h) defines membership fees; § 1.509(a)–3(i) defines ‘‘any bureau or similar agency of a governmental unit’’; § 1.509(a)–3(j) describes the treatment of certain indirect forms of support; paragraph (k) of this section describes the method of accounting for support; § 1.509(a)–3(l) describes the treatment of gross receipts from section 513(a)(1), section 513(a)(2), or section 513(a)(3) activities; § 1.509(a)–3(m) distinguishes gross receipts from gross investment income; and § 1.509(a)–3(n) describes transition rules for organizations that received advance rulings that expire on or after June 9, 2008. (3) * * * (i) In general. An organization will meet the not-more-than-one-third support test under section 509(a)(2)(B) if it normally (within the meaning of paragraph (c) or (d) of this section) receives not more than one-third of its support in each taxable year from the sum of its gross investment income (as defined in section 509(e)) and the excess (if any) of the amount of its unrelated VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:44 Sep 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 business taxable income (as defined in section 512) derived from trades or businesses that were acquired by the organization after June 30, 1975, over the amount of tax imposed on such income by section 511. For purposes of this section the amount of support received from items described in section 509(a)(2)(B) will be referred to as the numerator of the not-more-than-onethird support fraction, and the total amount of support (as defined in section 509(d)) will be referred to as the denominator of the not-more-than-onethird support fraction. For purposes of section 509(a)(2), paragraph (m) of this section distinguishes gross receipts from gross investment income. For purposes of section 509(e), gross investment income includes the items of investment income described in § 1.512(b)–1(a). * * * * * (c) Normally—(1) In general—(i) Definition. The support tests set forth in section 509(a)(2) are to be computed on the basis of the nature of the organization’s normal sources of support. An organization will be considered as ‘‘normally’’ receiving one third of its support from any combination of gifts, grants, contributions, membership fees, and gross receipts from permitted sources (subject to the limitations described in § 1.509(a)–3(b)) and not more than one third of its support from items described in section 509(a)(2)(B) for a taxable year and the taxable year immediately succeeding such year, if, for such taxable year and the four taxable years immediately preceding such taxable year, the aggregate amount of the support received during the applicable period from gifts, grants, contributions, membership fees, and gross receipts from permitted sources (subject to the limitations described in § 1.509(a)–3(b)) is more than one third, and the aggregate amount of the support received from items described in section 509(a)(2)(B) is not more than one third, of the total support of the organization for such five-year period. A publicly supported organization described under section 509(a)(2) that has failed to meet either the one-third support test of paragraph (a)(2) of this section or the not-more-than-one-third support test of paragraph (a)(3) of this section for two consecutive years will be treated as a private foundation as of the first day of the second consecutive taxable year only for purposes of sections 507, 4940, and 6033. Such an organization must file a Form 990–PF, ‘‘Return of Private Foundation or Section 4947(a)(1) Nonexempt Charitable Trust Treated as a Private Foundation,’’ and will be PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 55765 liable for the net investment tax imposed by section 4940 and, if applicable, the private foundation termination tax imposed by section 507(c), for that second consecutive failed year. For the succeeding years, the organization will be treated as a private foundation for all purposes. (ii) First five years of an organization’s existence. See paragraph (d)(1) of this section for the definition of ‘‘normally’’ for organizations in the first five years of their existence. (2) Terminations under section 507(b)(1)(B). For the special rules applicable to the term normally as applied to private foundations that elect to terminate their private foundation status pursuant to the 60-month procedure provided in section 507(b)(1)(B), see the regulations under such section. (3) Exclusion of unusual grants. For purposes of applying the tests for support set forth in paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this section, one or more contributions may be excluded from the numerator of the one-third support fraction and from the denominator of both the one-third support and notmore-than-one-third support fractions only if such a contribution meets the requirements of this paragraph (c)(3). The exclusion provided by this paragraph (c)(3) is generally intended to apply to substantial contributions and bequests from disinterested parties, which contributions or bequests— (i) Are attracted by reason of the publicly supported nature of the organization; (ii) Are unusual or unexpected with respect to the amount thereof; and (iii) Would by reason of their size, adversely affect the status of the organization as normally meeting the one-third support test for any of the applicable periods described in this paragraph (c) or paragraph (d) of this section. In the case of a grant (as defined in § 1.509(a)–3(g)) that meets the requirements of this paragraph (c)(3), if the terms of the granting instrument require that the funds be paid to the recipient organization over a period of years, the grant amounts may be excluded for such year or years in which they would otherwise be includible in computing support under the method of accounting on the basis of which the organization regularly computes its income in keeping its books under section 446. However, no item described in section 509(a)(2)(B) may be excluded under this paragraph (c)(3). The provisions of this paragraph (c)(3) shall apply to exclude unusual grants made during any of the applicable periods described in this E:\FR\FM\08SER2.SGM 08SER2 55766 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations paragraph (c) or paragraph (d) of this section. See paragraph (c)(5) of this section as to reliance by a grantee organization upon an unusual grant ruling under this paragraph (c)(3). (4) Determining factors. In determining whether a particular contribution may be excluded under paragraph (c)(3) of this section, all pertinent facts and circumstances will be taken into consideration. No single factor will necessarily be determinative. Among the factors to be considered are— (i) Whether the contribution was made by any person (or persons standing in a relationship to such person which is described in section 4946(a)(1)(C) through 4946(a)(1)(G)) who created the organization, previously contributed a substantial part of its support or endowment, or stood in a position of authority, such as a foundation manager (within the meaning of section 4946(b)), with respect to the organization. A contribution made by a person other than those persons described in this paragraph (c)(4)(i) will ordinarily be given more favorable consideration than a contribution made by a person described in this paragraph (c)(4)(i); (ii) Whether the contribution was a bequest or an inter vivos transfer. A bequest will ordinarily be given more favorable consideration than an inter vivos transfer; (iii) Whether the contribution was in the form of cash, readily marketable securities, or assets which further the exempt purposes of the organization, such as a gift of a painting to a museum; (iv) Except in the case of a new organization, whether, prior to the receipt of the particular contribution, the organization has carried on an actual program of public solicitation and exempt activities and has been able to attract a significant amount of public support; (v) Whether the organization may reasonably be expected to attract a significant amount of public support subsequent to the particular contribution. In this connection, continued reliance on unusual grants to fund an organization’s current operating expenses (as opposed to providing new endowment funds) may be evidence that the organization cannot reasonably be expected to attract future support from the general public; (vi) Whether, prior to the year in which the particular contribution was received, the organization met the onethird support test described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section without the benefit of any exclusions of unusual grants pursuant to paragraph (c)(3) of this section; (vii) Whether neither the contributor nor any person standing in a relationship to such contributor which is described in section 4946(a)(1)(C) through 4946(a)(1)(G) continues directly or indirectly to exercise control over the organization; (viii) Whether the organization has a representative governing body as described in § 1.509(a)–3(d)(3)(i); and (ix) Whether material restrictions or conditions (within the meaning of § 1.507–2(a)(7)) have been imposed by the transferor upon the transferee in connection with such transfer. (5) Grantors and contributors. Prior to the making of any grant or contribution expected to meet the requirements for exclusion under paragraph (c)(3) of this section, a potential grantee organization may request a determination whether such grant or contribution may be so excluded. Requests for such determination may be filed by the grantee organization in the time and manner specified by revenue procedure or other guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. The issuance of such determination will be at the sole discretion of the Commissioner. The organization must submit all information necessary to make a determination of the applicability of paragraph (c)(3) of this section, including all information relating to the factors described in paragraph (c)(4) of this section. If a favorable determination is issued, such determination may be relied upon by the grantor or contributor of the particular contribution in question for purposes of sections 170, 507, 545(b)(2), 642(c), 4942, 4945, 4966, 2055, 2106(a)(2), and 2522 and by the grantee organization for purposes of paragraph (c)(3) of this section. (6) Examples. The application of the principles set forth in this paragraph is illustrated by the examples as follows. For purposes of these examples, the term general public is defined as persons other than disqualified persons and other than persons from whom the foundation received gross receipts in excess of the greater of $5,000 or 1 percent of its support in any taxable year, the term gross investment income is as defined in section 509(e), and the term gross receipts is limited to receipts from activities which are not unrelated trades or businesses (within the meaning of section 513). Example 1. (i) For the years 2008 through 2012, X, an organization exempt under section 501(c)(3) that makes scholarship grants to needy students of a particular city, received support from the following sources: 2008: Gross receipts (general public) ........................................................................................................................................................... Contributions (substantial contributors) ............................................................................................................................................ Gross investment income .................................................................................................................................................................... $35,000 36,000 29,000 100,000 Total support ................................................................................................................................................................................ 2010: Gross receipts (general public) ........................................................................................................................................................... Contributions (substantial contributors) ............................................................................................................................................ Gross investment income .................................................................................................................................................................... sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES Total support ................................................................................................................................................................................ 2009: Gross receipts (general public) ........................................................................................................................................................... Contributions (substantial contributors) ............................................................................................................................................ Gross investment income .................................................................................................................................................................... 100,000 Total support ................................................................................................................................................................................ 2011: Gross receipts (general public) ........................................................................................................................................................... Contributions (substantial contributors) ............................................................................................................................................ Gross investment income .................................................................................................................................................................... 100,000 Total support ................................................................................................................................................................................ 100,000 VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:44 Sep 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\08SER2.SGM 08SER2 34,000 35,000 31,000 35,000 30,000 35,000 33,000 32,000 35,000 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 55767 31,000 39,000 30,000 Total support ................................................................................................................................................................................ sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES 2012: Gross receipts (general public) ........................................................................................................................................................... Contributions (substantial contributors) ............................................................................................................................................ Gross investment income .................................................................................................................................................................... 100,000 (ii) In applying section 509(a)(2) to the taxable year 2012, on the basis of paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section, the total amount of support from gross receipts from the general public ($168,000) for the period 2008 through 2012, was more than one third, and the total amount of support from gross investment income ($160,000) was less than one third, of X’s total support for the same period ($500,000). For the taxable years 2012 and 2013, X is therefore considered normally to receive more than one third of its support from the public sources described in section 509(a)(2)(A) and less than one third of its support from items described in section 509(a)(2)(B). The fact that X received less than one third of its support from section 509(a)(2)(A) sources in 2012 and more than one third of its support from items described in section 509(a)(2)(B) in 2011 does not affect its status because it normally met the applicable tests over a five-year period. Example 2. Assume the same facts as in Example 1 except that in 2012, X also received an unexpected bequest of $50,000 from A, an elderly widow who was interested in encouraging the work of X, but had no other relationship to it. Solely by reason of the bequest, A became a disqualified person. X used the bequest to create five new scholarships. Its operations otherwise remained the same. Under these circumstances, if A’s bequest is included in X’s support calculation, X could not meet the five-year support test because the total amount received from gross receipts from the general public ($168,000) would not be more than one-third of its total support for the fiveyear period ($550,000). Because A is a disqualified person, her bequest cannot be included in the numerator of the one-third support test under section 509(a)(2)(A). However, based on the factors set forth in paragraph (c)(4) of this section, A’s bequest may be excluded as an unusual grant under paragraph (c)(3) of this section. Therefore, X will be considered to have met the support test for the taxable years 2012 and 2013. Example 3. Y, an organization described in section 501(c)(3), was created by A, the holder of all the common stock in M corporation; B, A’s wife; and C, A’s business associate. The purpose of Y was to sponsor and equip athletic teams for underprivileged children in the community. Each of the three creators makes small cash contributions to Y. A, B, and C have been active participants in the affairs of Y since its creation. Y regularly raises small amounts of contributions through fundraising drives and selling admission to some of the sponsored sporting events. The operations of Y are carried out on a small scale, usually being restricted to the sponsorship of two to four baseball teams of underprivileged children. In 2009, M recapitalizes and creates a first and second class of 6 percent nonvoting preferred stock, most of which is held by A and B. In 2010, VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:44 Sep 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 A contributes 49 percent of his common stock in M to Y. A’s contribution of M’s common stock was substantial and constitutes 90 percent of Y’s total support for 2010. A combination of the facts and circumstances described in paragraph (c)(4) of this section preclude A’s contribution of M’s common stock in 2010 from being excluded as an unusual grant under paragraph (c)(3) of this section for purposes of determining whether Y meets the onethird support test under section 509(a)(2). Example 4. (i) M is organized in 2009 to promote the appreciation of ballet in a particular region of the United States. Its principal activities consist of erecting a theater for the performance of ballet and the organization and operation of a ballet company. M receives a determination letter that it is an organization described in section 501(c)(3) and that it is a public charity described in section 509(a)(2). The governing body of M consists of nine prominent unrelated citizens residing in the region who have either an expertise in ballet or a strong interest in encouraging appreciation of the art form. (ii) In 2010, Z, a private foundation, proposes to makes a grant of $500,000 in cash to M to provide sufficient capital for M to commence its activities. Although A, the creator of Z, is one of the nine members of M’s governing body, was one of M’s original founders, and continues to lend his prestige to M’s activities and fund raising efforts, A does not, directly or indirectly, exercise any control over M. M also receives a significant amount of support from a number of smaller contributions and pledges from other members of the general public. M charges admission to the ballet performances to the general public. (iii) Although the support received in 2010 will not impact M’s status as a public charity for its first five taxable years, it will be relevant to the determination of whether M meets the one-third support test under section 509(a)(2) for the 2014 taxable year, using the computation period 2010 through 2014. Within the appropriate timeframe, M may submit a request for a private letter ruling that the $500,000 contribution from Z qualifies as an unusual grant. (iv) Under the above circumstances, even though A was a founder and member of the governing body of M, M may exclude Z’s contribution of $500,000 in 2010 as an unusual grant under paragraph (c)(3) of this section for purposes of determining whether M meets the one-third support test under section 509(a)(2) for 2014. Example 5. (i) Assume the same facts as Example 4(i) except that, in addition, in 2013, B, a widow, passes away and bequeaths $4 million to M. During 2009 through 2013, B made small contributions to M, none exceeding $10,000 in any year. During 2009 through 2013, M received approximately PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 $450,000 from receipts for admissions and contributions from the general public. At the time of B’s death, no person standing in a relationship to B described in section 4946(a)(1)(C) through 4946(a)(1)(G) was a member of M’s governing body. B’s bequest was in the form of cash and readily marketable securities. The only condition placed upon the bequest was that it be used by M to advance the art of ballet. (ii) Although the support received in 2013 will not impact M’s status as a public charity for its first five taxable years, it will be relevant to the determination of whether M meets the one-third support test under section 509(a)(2) for future years. Within the appropriate timeframe, M may submit a request for a private letter ruling that the $4 million bequest from B qualifies as an unusual grant. (iii) Under the above circumstances, M may exclude B’s bequest of $4 million in 2013 as an unusual grant under paragraph (c)(3) of this section for purposes of determining whether M meets the one-third support test under section 509(a)(2) for 2014 and subsequent years. Example 6. (i) N is a research organization that was created by A in 2009 for the purpose of carrying on economic studies primarily through persons receiving grants from N and engaging in the sale of economic publications. N received a determination letter that it is described in section 501(c)(3) and that it is a public charity described in 509(a)(2). N’s five-member governing body consists of A; A’s sons, B and C; and two unrelated economists. In 2009, A made a contribution to N of $100,000 to help establish the organization. During 2009 through 2013, A made annual contributions to N averaging $20,000 a year. During the same period, N received annual contributions from members of the general public averaging $15,000 per year and receipts from the sale of its publications averaging $50,000 per year. In 2013, B made an inter vivos contribution to N of $600,000 in cash and readily marketable securities. (ii) Although the support received in 2013 will not impact N’s status as a public charity for its first five taxable years, it will be relevant to the determination of whether N meets the one-third support test under section 509(a)(2) for future years. In determining whether B’s contribution of $600,000 in 2013 may be excluded as an unusual grant, the support N received in 2009 through 2013 is relevant in considering the factor described in paragraph (c)(4)(vi) of this section, notwithstanding that N received a determination letter that it is described in section 509(a)(2). (iii) Under the above circumstances, in particular the facts that B is a disqualified person described in section 4946(a)(1)(D) and N does not have a representative governing body as described in paragraphs (c)(4)(viii) E:\FR\FM\08SER2.SGM 08SER2 55768 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES and (d)(3)(i) of this section, N cannot exclude B’s contribution of $600,000 in 2013 as an unusual grant under paragraph (c)(3) of this section for purposes of determining whether N meets the one-third support test under section 509(a)(2) for 2014 and future years. Example 7. (i) O is an educational organization created in 2009. O received a determination letter that it is described in section 501(c)(3) and that it is a public charity described in section 509(a)(2). The governing body of O has 9 members, consisting of A, a prominent civic leader, and 8 other unrelated civic leaders and educators in the community, all of whom participated in the creation of O. During 2009 through 2013, the principal source of income for O has been receipts from the sale of its educational periodicals. These sales have amounted to $200,000 for this period. Small contributions amounting to $50,000 have also been received during the same period from members of the governing body, including A, as well as other members of the general public. (ii) In 2013, A contributed $750,000 of the nonvoting stock of S, a closely held corporation, to O. A retained a substantial portion of the voting stock of S. By a majority vote, the governing body of O decided to retain the S stock for a period of at least five years. (iii) Although the support received in 2013 will not impact O’s status as a public charity for its first five taxable years, it will be relevant to the determination of whether O meets the one-third support test under section 509(a)(2) for future years. In determining whether A’s contribution of the S stock in 2013 may be excluded as an unusual grant, the support O received in 2009 through 2013 is relevant in considering the factor described in paragraph (c)(4)(vi) of this section, notwithstanding that O received a determination letter that it is described in section 509(a)(2). (iv) Under the above circumstances, in particular the facts that A is a foundation manager within the meaning of section 4946(b) and A’s contribution is in the form of closely held stock, O cannot exclude A’s contribution of the S stock in 2013 as an unusual grant under paragraph (c)(3) of this section for purposes of determining whether O meets the one-third support test under section 509(a)(2) for 2014 and future years. (d) Definition of normally; first five years of an organization’s existence—(1) In general. An organization will ‘‘normally’’ meet the one-third support test and the not-more-than-one-third support test during its first five taxable years as a section 501(c)(3) organization if the organization can reasonably be expected to meet the requirements of the one-third support test and the notmore-than-one-third support test during that period. With respect to an organization’s sixth taxable year, the general definition of normally in paragraph (c)(1) of this section applies. Alternatively, the organization shall be treated as normally meeting the onethird support test and the not-more- VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:44 Sep 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 than-one-third support test for its sixth taxable year (but not its seventh taxable year) if it meets the one-third support test and the not-more-than-one-third support test under the definition of normally set forth in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section for its fifth taxable year (based on support received in its first through fifth taxable years). If a new publicly supported organization described under section 509(a)(2) cannot meet the requirements of the one-third support test or the not-morethan-one-third support test for its sixth taxable year using either the general definition of normally in paragraph (c)(1) of this section or the alternate rule above (effectively failing to meet a public support test for both its fifth and sixth years), it will be reclassified as a private foundation as of the first day of its sixth taxable year only for purposes of sections 507, 4940, and 6033. Such an organization must file a Form 990–PF, ‘‘Return of Private Foundation or Section 4947(a)(1) Nonexempt Charitable Trust Treated as a Private Foundation,’’ and is liable for the net investment tax imposed by section 4940 and, if applicable, the private foundation termination tax imposed by section 507(c), for its sixth taxable year. Beginning the first day of its seventh taxable year, the organization will be treated as a private foundation for all purposes. (2) Basic consideration. In determining whether an organization can reasonably be expected (within the meaning of paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section) to meet the one-third support test under section 509(a)(2)(A) and the not-more-than-one-third support test under section 509(a)(2)(B) described in paragraph (a) of this section during its first five taxable years, the basic consideration is whether its organizational structure, current or proposed programs or activities, and actual or intended method of operation are such as to attract the type of broadly based support from the general public, public charities, and governmental units that is necessary to meet such tests. The factors that are relevant to this determination, and the weight accorded to each of them, may differ from case to case, depending on the nature and functions of the organization. An organization cannot reasonably be expected to meet the one-third support test and the not-more-than-one-third support test where the facts indicate that an organization is likely during its first five taxable years to receive less than one-third of its support from permitted sources (subject to the limitations of paragraph (b) of this PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 section) or to receive more than onethird of its support from items described in section 509(a)(2)(B). (3) Factors taken into account. All pertinent facts and circumstances shall be taken into account under paragraph (d)(2) of this section in determining whether the organizational structure, programs or activities, and method of operation of an organization are such as to enable it to meet the tests under section 509(a)(2) during its first five taxable years. Some of the pertinent factors are: (i) Whether the organization has or will have a representative governing body which is comprised of public officials, or individuals chosen by public officials acting in their capacity as such; of persons having special knowledge in the particular field or discipline in which the organization is operating; of community leaders, such as elected officials, clergymen, and educators; or, in the case of a membership organization, of individuals elected pursuant to the organization’s governing instrument or bylaws by a broadly based membership. This characteristic does not exist if the membership of the organization’s governing body is such as to indicate that it represents the personal or private interests of disqualified persons, rather than the interests of the community or the general public. (ii) Whether a substantial portion of the organization’s initial funding is to be provided by the general public, by public charities, or by government grants, rather than by a limited number of grantors or contributors who are disqualified persons with respect to the organization. The fact that the organization plans to limit its activities to a particular community or region or to a special field which can be expected to appeal to a limited number of persons will be taken into consideration in determining whether those persons providing the initial support for the organization are representative of the general public. On the other hand, the subsequent sources of funding which the organization can reasonably expect to receive after it has become established and fully operational will also be taken into account. (iii) Whether a substantial proportion of the organization’s initial funds are placed, or will remain, in an endowment, and whether the investment of such funds is unlikely to result in more than one third of its total support being received from items described in section 509(a)(2)(B). (iv) In the case of an organization that carries on fundraising activities, whether the organization has developed E:\FR\FM\08SER2.SGM 08SER2 sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations a concrete plan for solicitation of funds from the general public on a community or area-wide basis; whether any steps have been taken to implement such plan; whether any firm commitments of financial or other support have been made to the organization by civic, religious, charitable, or similar groups within the community; and whether the organization has made any commitments to, or established any working relationships with, those organizations or classes of persons intended as the future recipients of its funds. (v) In the case of an organization that carries on community services, such as combating community deterioration in an economically depressed area that has suffered a major loss of population and jobs, whether the organization has a concrete program to carry out its work in the community; whether any steps have been taken to implement that program; whether it will receive any part of its funds from a public charity or governmental agency to which it is in some way held accountable as a condition of the grant or contribution; and whether it has enlisted the sponsorship or support of other civic or community leaders involved in community service programs similar to those of the organization. (vi) In the case of an organization that carries on educational or other exempt activities for, or on behalf of, members, whether the solicitation for dues-paying members is designed to enroll a substantial number of persons in the community, area, profession, or field of special interest (depending on the size of the area and the nature of the organization’s activities); whether membership dues for individual (rather than institutional) members have been fixed at rates designed to make membership available to a broad crosssection of the public rather than to restrict membership to a limited number of persons; and whether the activities of the organization will be likely to appeal to persons having some broad common interest or purpose, such as educational activities in the case of alumni associations, musical activities in the case of symphony societies, or civic affairs in the case of parent-teacher associations. (vii) In the case of an organization that provides goods, services, or facilities, whether the organization is or will be required to make its services, facilities, performances, or products available (regardless of whether a fee is charged) to the general public, public charities, or governmental units, rather than to a limited number of persons or organizations; whether the organization VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:44 Sep 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 will avoid executing contracts to perform services for a limited number of firms or governmental agencies or bureaus; and whether the service to be provided is one which can be expected to meet a special or general need among a substantial portion of the general public. (4) Example. The application of this paragraph (d) may be illustrated by the following example: Example. (i) Organization X was formed in January 2008 and uses a taxable year ending December 31. After September 9, 2008, and before December 31, 2008, Organization X filed Form 1023 requesting recognition of exemption as an organization described in section 501(c)(3) and in section 509(a)(2). In its application, Organization X established that it can reasonably be expected to operate as a publicly supported organization under paragraph (d) of this section. Subsequently, Organization X received a ruling or determination letter that it is an organization described in sections 501(c)(3) and 509(a)(2) effective as of the date of its formation. (ii) Organization X is described in section 509(a)(2) for its first five taxable years (for the taxable years ending December 31, 2008, through December 31, 2012). (iii) Organization X can qualify as a publicly supported organization beginning with the taxable year ending December 31, 2013, if Organization X can meet the requirements of either § 1.170A–9(f)(2) or § 1.170A–9(f)(3) or paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section for the taxable years ending December 31, 2009, through December 31, 2013, or for the taxable years ending December 31, 2008, through December 31, 2012. (e) Determinations on foundation classification and reliance—(1) A ruling or determination letter that an organization is described in section 509(a)(2) may be issued to an organization. Such determination may be made in conjunction with the recognition of the organization’s taxexempt status or at such other time as the organization believes it is described in section 509(a)(2). The ruling or determination letter that the organization is described in section 509(a)(2) may be revoked if, upon examination, the organization has not met the requirements of this section. The ruling or determination letter that the organization is described in section 509(a)(2) also may be revoked if the organization’s application for a ruling or determination contained one or more material misstatements or omissions of fact or such application was part of a scheme or plan to avoid or evade any provision of the Code. The revocation of the determination that an organization is described in section 509(a)(2) does not preclude revocation of the determination that the organization is described in section 501(c)(3). PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 55769 (2) Status of grantors or contributors. (i) For purposes of sections 170, 507, 545(b)(2), 642(c), 4942, 4945, 4966, 2055, 2106(a)(2), and 2522, grantors and contributors may rely upon a determination letter or ruling that an organization is described in section 509(a)(2) until the IRS publishes notice of a change of status (for example, in the Internal Revenue Bulletin or Publication 78, ‘‘Cumulative List of Organizations described in Section 170(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,’’ which can be searched at https://www.irs.gov). For this purpose, grantors or contributors may also rely on an advance ruling that expires on or after June 9, 2008. However, a grantor or contributor may not rely on such an advance ruling or any determination letter or ruling if the grantor or contributor was responsible for, or aware of, the act or failure to act that resulted in the organization’s loss of classification under section 509(a)(2) or acquired knowledge that the IRS had given notice to such organization that it would be deleted from such classification. (ii) A grantor or contributor (other than one of the organization’s founders, creators, or foundation managers (within the meaning of section 4946(b))) will not be considered to be responsible for, or aware of, the act or failure to act that resulted in the loss of the organization’s publicly supported classification under section 509(a)(2) if such grantor or contributor has made such grant or contribution in reliance upon a written statement by the grantee organization that such grant or contribution will not result in the loss of such organization’s classification as not a private foundation under section 509(a). Such statement must be signed by a responsible officer of the grantee organization and must set forth sufficient information, including a summary of the pertinent financial data for the five taxable years immediately preceding the current taxable year, to assure a reasonably prudent person that his grant or contribution will not result in the loss of the grantee organization’s classification as a publicly supported organization under section 509(a). If a reasonable doubt exists as to the effect of such grant or contribution, or if the grantor or contributor is one of the organization’s founders, creators, or foundation managers, the procedure for requesting a determination letter set forth in paragraph (c)(5) of this section may be followed by the grantee organization for the protection of the grantor or contributor. E:\FR\FM\08SER2.SGM 08SER2 55770 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations (3) Examples. The provisions of this paragraph (e) may be illustrated by the following examples: Example 1. Y, a calendar year organization described in section 501(c)(3), is created in February 2008 for the purpose of displaying African art. On its exemption application Y shows, under penalties of perjury, that it can reasonably, in accordance with the requirements of paragraph (d) of this section, expect to receive support from the public in 2008 through 2012 that will satisfy the onethird support and not-more-than-one-third support tests described in section 509(a)(2) for its first five taxable years, 2008 through 2012. Y may therefore receive a determination that it meets the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section for its first five taxable years (2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012), regardless of the public support Y in fact receives during this period. Example 2. Z, a calendar year organization described in section 501(c)(3), is created in July 2008. On its exemption application Z shows, under penalties of perjury, that it can reasonably, in accordance with the requirements of paragraph (d) of this section, expect to receive support from the public in 2008 through 2012 that will satisfy the onethird support and not-more-than-one-third support tests described in section 509(a)(2) for its first five taxable years, 2008 through 2012. Z receives a determination that it is described in section 509(a)(2). However, the support actually received from the public over Z’s first five taxable years (2008 through 2012) does not satisfy the one-third support and not-more-than-one-third support tests described in section 509(a)(2). Moreover, the support Z receives from 2009 through 2013, also does not meet the one-third support and not-more-than-one-third support tests described in section 509(a)(2). Z is described in section 509(a)(2) during its first five years for all purposes. However, because Z has not met the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section for either 2008 through 2012 or 2009 through 2013, Z is not described in section 509(a)(2) for its taxable year 2013. If Z is not described in section 509(a)(1), section 509(a)(3), or section 509(a)(4), then Z will be reclassified as a private foundation as of the first day of 2013. However, for 2013, Z will be treated as a private foundation only for purposes of sections 507, 4940 and 6033. Z must file Form 990–PF and will be liable for the net investment tax imposed by section 4940 and, if applicable, the private foundation termination tax imposed by section 507(c) for 2013. For 2014 and succeeding years, Z will be treated as a private foundation for all purposes (except as provided in paragraph (e)(2) of this section with respect to grantors and contributors). sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES * * * * * (k) Method of accounting. For purposes of section 509(a)(2), an organization’s support will be determined under the method of accounting on the basis of which the organization regularly computes its income in keeping its books under section 446. For example, if a grantor makes a grant to an organization payable VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:44 Sep 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 over a term of years, such grant will be includible in the support fraction of the grantee organization under the method of accounting on the basis of which it regularly computes its income in keeping its books under section 446. * * * * * (n) Transition rules. (1) An organization that received an advance ruling, that expires on or after June 9, 2008, that it will be treated as an organization described in section 509(a)(2) will be treated as meeting the requirements of paragraph (d)(1) of this section for the first five taxable years of its existence as a section 501(c)(3) organization unless the IRS issued to the organization a proposed determination prior to September 9, 2008, that the organization is not described in sections 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) and 509(a)(1) or in section 509(a)(2). (2) Paragraph (d)(1) of this section shall not apply to an organization that received an advance ruling that expired prior to June 9, 2008, and that did not timely file with the IRS the required information to establish that it is an organization described in sections 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) and 509(a)(1) or in section 509(a)(2). (3) An organization that fails to meet a public support test for its first taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2008, under the regulations in this section may use the prior test set forth in §§ 1.509(a)–3(a)(2) and 1.509(a)– 3(a)(3) or § 1.170A–9(e)(2i) or § 1.170A– 9(e)(3) as in effect before September 9, 2008, (as contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised April 1, 2008) to determine whether the organization may be publicly supported for its 2008 taxable year based on its satisfaction of a public support test for taxable year 2007, computed over the period 2003 through 2006. (4) Examples. The application of this paragraph (n) may be illustrated by the following examples: Example 1. (i) Organization M was formed in January 2004, and uses a taxable year ending June 30. Organization M received an advance ruling letter that it is recognized as an organization described in section 501(c)(3) effective as of the date of its formation and that it is treated as a publicly supported organization under section 509(a)(2) during the five-year advance ruling period that will end on June 30, 2008. This date is on or after June 9, 2008. (ii) Under the transition rule, Organization M is a publicly supported organization described in section 509(a)(2) for the taxable years ending June 30, 2004, through June 30, 2008. Organization M does not need to establish within 90 days after June 30, 2008, that it met a public support test under § 1.170A–9(e) or § 1.509(a)–3, as in effect prior to September 9, 2008, (as contained in PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 26 CFR part 1 revised April 1, 2008) for its advance ruling period. (iii) Organization M can qualify as a public charity beginning with the taxable year ending June 30, 2009, if Organization M can meet the requirements of § 1.170A–9(f)(2) or § 1.170A–9(f)(3) or paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this section for the taxable years ending June 30, 2005, through June 30, 2009, or for the taxable years ending June 30, 2004, through June 30, 2008. In addition, for its taxable year ending June 30, 2009, Organization M may qualify as a publicly supported organization by availing itself of the transition rule contained in paragraph (n)(iii) of this section, which looks to support received by M in the taxable years ending June 30, 2004, through June 30, 2007. Example 2. (i) Organization N was formed in January 2000 and uses a December 31 taxable year. Organization N received a final determination that it was recognized as taxexempt under section 501(c)(3) and as a public charity prior to September 9, 2008. (ii) For taxable year 2008, Organization N will qualify as publicly supported if it meets the requirements under either § 1.170A– 9(f)(2) or § 1.170A–9(f)(3) or paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this section for the five-year period January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2008. Organization N will also qualify as publicly supported for taxable year 2008 if it meets the requirements under either § 1.170A–9(e)(2) or § 1.170A–9(e)(3) or §§ 1.509(a)–3(a)(2) and 1.509(a)–3(a)(3) as in effect prior to September 9, 2008, (as contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised April 1, 2008) for taxable year 2007, using the fouryear period from January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2006. (o) Effective/applicability date. This section shall generally apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1969 except paragraphs (a)(2), (a)(3)(i), (c), (d), (e), (k) and (n) of this section shall apply to tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2008. For tax years beginning after December 31, 1969 and beginning before January 1, 2008, §§ 1.509(a)– 3(a)(2), 1.509(a)–3(a)(3)(i), 1.509(a)–3(c), 1.509(a)–3(d), 1.509(a)–3(e), and 1.509(a)–3(k) as in effect on December 31, 2007 (as contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised April 1, 2008) shall apply. § 1.509(a)–3T [Removed] Par. 7. Section 1.509(a)–3T is removed. ■ Par. 8. Section 1.6033–2 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2)(ii)(g), (a)(2)(ii)(h), (g)(1)(iii), (g)(1)(iv), (g)(6), (i)(1) and (k) to read as follows: ■ § 1.6033–2 Returns by exempt organizations (taxable years beginning after December 31, 1969) and returns by certain nonexempt organizations (taxable years beginning after December 31, 1980). (a) * * * (1) Except as provided in section 6033(a)(3) and paragraph (g) of this E:\FR\FM\08SER2.SGM 08SER2 55771 sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations section, every organization exempt from taxation under section 501(a) shall file an annual information return specifically setting forth its items of gross income, gross receipts and disbursements, and such other information as may be prescribed in the instructions, issued with respect to the return. Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, such return shall be filed annually regardless of whether such organization is chartered by, or affiliated or associated with, any central, parent, or other organization. (2) * * * (ii) * * * (g) The names and addresses of all officers, directors, or trustees (or any person having responsibilities or powers similar to those of officers, directors or trustees) of the organization, and, in the case of a private foundation, all persons who are foundation managers, within the meaning of section 4946(b)(1). Organizations must also attach a schedule showing the names and addresses and/or total numbers of key employees, highly compensated employees, and independent contractors as prescribed by publication, form, or instructions. (h) A schedule showing the compensation and other payments made to each person whose name is required to be listed pursuant to paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(g) of this section during the calendar year ending within the organization’s annual accounting period, or during such other period as prescribed by publication, form, or instructions. * * * * * (g) * * * (1) * * * (iii) An organization (other than a private foundation) described in section 6033(a)(3)(C), the gross receipts of which in each taxable year are normally not more than $5,000 (as described in paragraph (g)(3) of this section); (iv) A mission society (other than an organization described in section 509(a)(3)) sponsored by or affiliated with one or more churches or church denominations, more than one-half of the activities of which society are conducted in, or directed at persons in foreign countries; * * * * * (6) The Commissioner may relieve any organization or class of organizations (other than an organization described in section 509(a)(3)) from filing, in whole or in part the annual return required by this section where he determines that such returns are not necessary for the VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:44 Sep 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 efficient administration of the internal revenue laws. * * * * * (i) * * * (1) An organization that is exempt from taxation under section 501(a) and is not required to file annually an information return required by this section shall immediately notify in writing Exempt Organizations Determinations, at an address prescribed by publication (including publication on the Internal Revenue Service Web site), of any changes in its character, operations, or purpose for which it was originally created. * * * * * (k) Effective/applicability date—(1) Generally. The provisions of this section shall apply with respect to returns filed for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1969. (2) The applicability of paragraphs (g)(1)(iii), (g)(1)(iv), and (g)(6) of this section shall be limited to returns filed for taxable years ending after August 17, 2006. For returns filed for taxable years ending on or before August 17, 2006, §§ 1.6033–(2)(g)(1)(iii), 1.6033– (2)(g)(1)(iv), and 1.6033–(2)(g)(6) (as contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised April 1, 2006) shall apply. (3) The applicability of paragraphs (a)(2)(ii)(g) and (a)(2)(ii)(h) of this section shall be limited to returns filed on or after January 1, 2008. For returns filed before January 1, 2008, §§ 1.6033– (a)(2)(ii)(g) and 1.6033–(2)(a)(2)(ii)(h) (as contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised April 1, 2008) shall apply. § 1.6033–2T ■ [Removed] Par. 9. Section 1.6033–2T is removed. Par. 10. Section 1.6043–3 is amended by revising paragraphs (b)(8), (d) and (e) to read as follows: ■ § 1.6043–3 Returns regarding liquidation, dissolution, termination, or substantial contraction of organizations exempt from taxation under section 501(a). * * * * * (b) * * * (8) Any organization no longer exempt from taxation under section 501(a) and that during the period of its exemption under such section was not an organization described in section 501(c)(3), a corporation described in section 501(c)(2) that held title to property for an organization described in section 501(c)(3), or an organization described in such other section as prescribed by publication, form, or instructions. * * * * * (d) Definitions. (1) For the definition of the term ‘‘normally’’ as used in PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 paragraph (b)(2) of this section, see § 1.6033–2(g)(3). (2) For the definition of the term ‘‘integrated auxiliaries’’ as used in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, see § 1.6033–2(h). (3) For returns filed for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2008, for purposes of this section the definition of the term ‘‘substantial contraction’’ set forth in § 1.6043–3(d)(1) (as contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised April 1, 2008) may be used. (e) Effective/applicability date—(1) Generally. The provisions of this section shall apply with respect to returns filed for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1969. (2) Paragraphs (b)(8) and (d) of this section shall apply for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2008. For taxable years beginning before January 1, 2008, §§ 1.6043–3(b)(8) and 1.6043–3(d) (as contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised April 1, 2008) shall apply. § 1.6043–3T [Removed] Par. 11. Section 1.6043–3T is removed. ■ PART 602—OMB CONTROL NUMBER UNDER THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT Par. 12. The authority citation for part 602 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805. Par. 13. In § 602.101, paragraph (b) is amended as follows: ■ 1. The following entry to the table is removed: ■ § 602.101 * OMB Control numbers. * * (b) * * * * * CFR part or section where identified * * * Current OMB Control No. * 1.6033–2T ............................. * * * * 1545–2117 * * 2. The following entry is added in numerical order to the table: ■ § 602.101 * OMB Control numbers. * * (b) * * * * * CFR part or section where identified and described E:\FR\FM\08SER2.SGM 08SER2 Current OMB Control No. 55772 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations CFR part or section where identified and described * * * Current OMB Control No. * 1.6033–2 ............................... * * * * * 1545–2117 * Steven T. Miller, Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement. Approved: August 19, 2011. Emily S. McMahon, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy). [FR Doc. 2011–22614 Filed 9–7–11; 8:45 am] sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES BILLING CODE 4830–01–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:44 Sep 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\08SER2.SGM 08SER2

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 174 (Thursday, September 8, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 55746-55772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-22614]



[[Page 55745]]

Vol. 76

Thursday,

No. 174

September 8, 2011

Part II





Department of the Treasury





-----------------------------------------------------------------------





Internal Revenue Service





-----------------------------------------------------------------------





26 CFR Parts 1 and 602





Implementation of Form 990; Final Rule

Federal Register / Vol. 76 , No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2011 / 
Rules and Regulations

[[Page 55746]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Parts 1 and 602

[TD 9549]
RIN 1545-BH28


Implementation of Form 990

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Final regulations and removal of temporary regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations necessary to 
implement the redesigned Form 990, ``Return of Organization Exempt From 
Income Tax.'' These final regulations make revisions to the regulations 
to allow for new threshold amounts for reporting compensation, to 
require that compensation be reported on a calendar year basis, and to 
modify the scope of organizations subject to information reporting 
requirements upon a substantial contraction. The final regulations also 
eliminate the advance ruling process for new organizations, change the 
public support computation period for publicly supported organizations 
to five years, consistent with the revised Form 990, and clarify that 
support must be reported using the organization's overall method of 
accounting. All tax-exempt organizations required to file annual 
information returns are affected by these regulations.

DATES: Effective Date: These regulations are effective on September 8, 
2011.
    Applicability Date: For dates of applicability, see Sec. Sec.  
1.170A-9(k), 1.507-2(f), 1.509(a)-3(o), 1.6033-2(k), and 1.6043-3(e).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terri Harris at (202) 622-6070 (not a 
toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Paperwork Reduction Act

    The collection of information contained in these final regulations 
has been reviewed and approved by the Office of Management and Budget 
in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
3507(d)) under control number 1545-2117. The estimated annual burden 
per recordkeeper will vary, depending on individual circumstances. The 
collection of information in this final regulation is in Sec.  1.6033-
2. The information collected under Sec.  1.6033-2 relates to 
compensation reporting by tax-exempt organizations. The information 
that is required to be collected for purposes of Sec.  1.6033-2 is 
required to be submitted on Form 990, ``Return of Organization Exempt 
From Income Tax.'' For further information concerning this collection 
of information and the burden associated with the Form 990, or where to 
submit comments on this collection of information and the accuracy of 
the estimated burden, please refer to the instructions of the Form 990. 
The total annual reporting burden associated with this document is one 
hour.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid 
control number assigned by the Office of Management and Budget.
    Books or records relating to a collection of information must be 
retained as long as their contents may become material in the 
administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and 
tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.

Background

Form 990

    Under section 6033 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code), 
organizations that are exempt from Federal income tax under section 
501(a) are generally required to file an annual information return 
reporting gross income, receipts, disbursements, and such other 
information as the IRS requires. Certain exceptions to this filing 
requirement apply. For example, churches are not required to file 
annual information returns. The Treasury regulations direct that the 
annual information return shall be filed on Form 990, ``Return of 
Organization Exempt From Income Tax'' or Form 990-PF, ``Return of 
Private Foundation or Section 4947(a)(1) Nonexempt Charitable Trust 
Treated as a Private Foundation.'' The regulations further specify 
certain information to be reported on the return.
    The IRS revises forms and instructions on an annual basis to 
reflect changes in the law and evolving tax administration needs. On 
December 20, 2007, the IRS released a redesigned Form 990. The Form 990 
had not been significantly revised since 1979, and both the IRS and 
stakeholders regarded the form as needing major revision to keep pace 
with changes in the law and with the increasing size, diversity, and 
complexity of the exempt sector. With the exception of certain smaller 
organizations for which there is a graduated transition period, 
organizations began using the new form for the 2008 tax year (returns 
filed in 2009).
    On September 9, 2008, the IRS and the Treasury Department issued 
final and temporary regulations under sections 170(b), 507, 509(a), 
6033, and 6043 necessary to implement the redesigned Form 990, ``Return 
of Organization Exempt from Income Tax,'' (TD 9423) in the Federal 
Register (73 FR 52528). Also on September 9, 2008, the IRS and the 
Treasury Department issued a notice of proposed rulemaking cross-
referencing those Temporary Regulations and inviting public comment and 
requests for a public hearing (REG-142333-07) in the Federal Register 
(73 FR 52218).
    The IRS did not receive any requests for a public hearing. The IRS 
received one written comment responding to this notice. After 
consideration of the comment, the proposed regulations are revised and 
published in final form substantially as proposed. The major areas of 
comment and revision are discussed in the following Explanation of 
Provisions.

Summary of Comments and Explanation of Provisions

Private Foundation Status and Advance Rulings

    In its application for recognition of tax-exempt status (Form 1023, 
``Application for Recognition of Exemption Under Section 501(c)(3) of 
the Internal Revenue Code''), a section 501(c)(3) organization also 
requests a determination of its private foundation status or public 
charity status, that is, whether it is a private foundation and, if 
not, the Code provision excepting it from private foundation 
classification. Under the current statute and prior regulations, an 
organization could request either an advance ruling or a definitive 
ruling addressing the organization's exemption under section 501(c)(3) 
and its private foundation status under section 509(a). The proposed 
regulations eliminated the advance ruling process and provided instead 
that an organization would be a publicly supported organization (thus 
qualifying for public charity status) in its first five years if it 
could show, in its application for exemption, that it could reasonably 
be expected to receive the requisite public support during such period.
    The comment suggested that the final regulations clarify the 
process for requesting an updated ruling or determination letter as to 
public charity status under Sec. Sec.  1.170A-9(f)(5) and 1.509(a)-
3(e). This process is now explained in Rev. Proc. 2011-10, 2011-

[[Page 55747]]

2 IRB 294 and its successors. Thus, the final regulations do not 
incorporate this suggestion.

Computation Period for Public Support

    The proposed regulations changed the computation period for public 
support from a four-year period comprised of the four years prior to 
the taxable year being tested to a five-year period ending with the 
taxable year being tested. An organization that meets a public support 
test for a taxable year is treated as publicly supported for that 
taxable year and the immediately succeeding taxable year. An 
organization that does not meet a public support test for a taxable 
year may be at risk of being classified as a private foundation as of 
the first day of the succeeding taxable year if the organization also 
fails to meet a public support test for that succeeding taxable year. 
Because the IRS and the Treasury Department recognized that an 
organization will not be able to compute its public support for a 
taxable year under the changed computation period until the subsequent 
taxable year, the notice of proposed rulemaking requested comments on 
specific situations that might warrant relief from the imposition of 
Chapter 42 excise taxes. In addition, organizations that believed that 
it would be unfair or inequitable to impose the private foundation 
excise taxes or penalties against them for all or part of the first 
year in which they were reclassified as private foundations were 
invited to contact the IRS, Exempt Organizations, Rulings and 
Agreements, Washington, DC. No organizations contacted the IRS.
    The comment suggested that the final regulations should treat 
organizations that fail a public support test for two consecutive years 
as private foundations as of the beginning of the second test year only 
for purposes of section 507 (termination of private foundation status) 
and section 4940 (excise tax on investment income), and that such an 
organization should not be treated as a private foundation for all 
other purposes until the beginning of the third consecutive taxable 
year. The commenter suggested that such a rule was necessary because 
organizations cannot always predict the amount of support they receive 
from year-to-year. The comment analogized this suggestion to the rule 
that previously applied when a new organization reached the end of its 
five-year advance ruling period. Under the prior regulations, an 
organization generally was treated as publicly supported until 90 days 
after the end of the advance ruling period, or, if Form 8734, ``Support 
Schedule for Advance Ruling Period,'' was timely submitted, until the 
IRS made a final determination of its status. If an organization failed 
to qualify as a publicly supported organization, only the section 4940 
investment income tax and section 507 termination tax applied for the 
five-year advance ruling period that had already ended. The 
reclassified organization and its disqualified persons would be subject 
to all the Chapter 42 excise taxes applicable to private foundations 
and disqualified persons only after the end of the 90-day period or 
when the IRS made a final determination.
    In response to the comment, the final regulations provide that an 
organization that fails a public support test for two consecutive 
taxable years will be treated as a private foundation as of the 
beginning of the second year of failure only for purposes of sections 
507, 4940, and 6033. An organization will be treated as a private 
foundation for all purposes beginning the first day of the third 
consecutive taxable year.
    The comment also suggested adding examples applying the ``facts and 
circumstances test'' under Sec.  1.170(A)-9T(f)(3) or issuing other 
guidance providing examples of the application of this test. The 
proposed regulations contained numerous examples reflecting the five-
year computation period in Sec. Sec.  1.170A-9T(f)(9), 1.509(a)-
3T(c)(6), and 1.509(a)-3T(e)(3), including several examples 
illustrating the application of the facts and circumstances test in 
Sec.  1.170A-9(f)(9). The final regulations retain the examples in the 
proposed regulations but do not include additional examples, as it was 
not clear what additional clarification was needed.

Method of Accounting

    Previously, when a section 501(c)(3) organization computed its 
public support, it was required to use the cash method of accounting to 
report the amount of public support it received on Schedule A, ``Public 
Charity Status and Public Support,'' even if the organization used the 
accrual method of accounting to keep its books under section 446, and 
otherwise report on Form 990. Under the proposed regulations, when a 
section 501(c)(3) organization computed its public support and reported 
the information on Schedule A, it was required to use the same 
accounting method that it uses to keep its books under section 446 and 
that it otherwise uses to report on its Form 990.
    The comment observed that an organization using the accrual method 
of accounting to keep its books and to calculate its public support 
will need to include the present value of a multi-year grant as support 
in the year in which the grant commitment is received. The commenter 
suggested that this could deter private foundations from making 
substantial multi-year grants to an organization due to a concern that 
the grant could cause the organization to fail the public support test 
and be reclassified as a private foundation. The comment suggested that 
the unusual grant rules in the final regulations be expanded to add a 
new factor giving favorable consideration to certain types of multi-
year private foundation grants. Alternatively, the comment suggested 
that the regulations should permit organizations to elect, for purposes 
of the public support test, to accrue multi-year grants ratably over 
the period to which they relate.
    The final regulations do not incorporate these suggestions. While 
the requirement to compute public support in accordance with an 
organization's normal method of accounting generally is advantageous 
and less cumbersome for most organizations, the IRS and the Treasury 
Department recognize that some accrual-method organizations receiving 
substantial multi-year grants from private foundations and individuals 
may be concerned that the requirement to account for those multi-year 
grants on an accrual-method may adversely affect their public charity 
status. However, the longer, five-year testing period in the proposed 
and final regulations should mitigate the impact of recognizing a 
larger amount of support from one source in a single year.
    In addition, one of the goals of the redesign of the Form 990 was 
to implement consistent reporting throughout each organization's Form 
990 and financial records in order to reduce an organization's 
recordkeeping burden and to increase transparency of an organization's 
activities to the general public. In general, use of an organization's 
normal method of accounting for calculation of its public support 
reduces the recordkeeping and reporting burden on accrual-method 
taxpayers, as they no longer must maintain separate cash method records 
solely for reporting public support on Schedule A. The revised Form 
990, Schedule A, sets forth easier-to-follow rules for calculating 
public support and captures the information necessary for the 
organization and the general public to monitor an organization's 
compliance with the public support tests. Consistent financial 
reporting on the basis of an organization's normal accounting method 
throughout the organization's Form 990, including the support test in

[[Page 55748]]

Schedule A, facilitates reconciliation of the Form 990 reporting with 
an organization's audited financial statements, increasing the ability 
of the general public to rely on an organization's Form 990 as an 
accurate reflection of the organization's financial circumstances. 
Consistent reporting thus assists in the oversight of the charitable 
community by the general public, as well as by the IRS. Given these 
considerations, the IRS and the Treasury Department have determined not 
to adopt the suggested elective change to the accounting method for 
multi-year grants.
    The IRS and the Treasury Department also decline to adopt the 
suggestion that the unusual grant rules be expanded to include multi-
year grants. The public support test is designed to ensure that an 
organization is not funded by a small number of large donors, and IRS 
and the Treasury Department do not believe it should exclude a large 
contribution from a single donor simply because it is paid out over a 
number of years. The fact that a grant is a multi-year grant has 
historically been taken into consideration in determining whether a 
particular grant constitutes an unusual grant, at times to the benefit 
and at times to the detriment of the recipient organization. The 
unusual grant exclusion generally applies to substantial contributions 
or bequests that (1) Are attracted by the publicly supported nature of 
the organization, (2) are unusual or unexpected in their amount, and 
(3) would adversely affect the organization's public charity status 
because of their amount. The final regulations in Sec. Sec.  1.170A-
9(f)(6)(ii)(B) and 1.509(a)-3(c)(3)(iii) provide that all pertinent 
facts and circumstances continue to be taken into consideration when 
determining whether a particular contribution will be excluded from the 
support calculation under the unusual grant exclusion, with no single 
factor being determinative.
    If an accrual basis organization receives a substantial multi-year 
grant from a private foundation or individual that, taken along with 
all other facts and circumstances, would satisfy the standards in 
Sec. Sec.  1.170A-9(f)(6) and 1.509(a)-3(c)(3) for treatment as an 
unusual grant, such a grant generally would be excluded from the 
computation of public support. An organization may request a private 
letter ruling pursuant to Sec. Sec.  1.170A-9(f)(6)(iv) and 1.509(a)-
3(c)(5) that a multi-year grant constitutes an unusual grant under 
Sec. Sec.  1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) and 1.509(a)-3(c)(3), based on all the 
facts and circumstances. See also Rev. Proc 2011-4 (2011-1 IRB 123) and 
its successors. Additionally, Rev. Proc. 81-7 (1981-1 CB 621), provides 
guidelines regarding grants and contributions, including multi-year 
grants to finance capital items, that will be considered unusual grants 
under Sec. Sec.  1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) and 1.509(a)-3(c)(3) and related 
provisions without a private letter ruling from the IRS.

Reliance

    The proposed regulations provided that donors may rely on an 
organization's ruling that the organization is described in sections 
170(b)(1)(A)(vi) and 509(a)(1) or in section 509(a)(2) until notice of 
a change in status is provided to the public (such as by publication in 
the Internal Revenue Bulletin), unless the donor was responsible for, 
or aware of, the act or failure to act that results in the 
organization's loss of public charity status. The proposed regulations 
further provided that donors may rely on advance rulings that expire on 
or after June 9, 2008, until notice of a change in status is provided 
to the public (such as by publication in the Internal Revenue 
Bulletin).
    The comment suggested that the final regulations should incorporate 
a safe harbor under which a grantor or contributor will not be 
considered responsible for, or aware of, an act or failure to act that 
will result in loss of public charity status, such as those set forth 
in Rev. Proc. 89-23 (1989-1 CB 844) and Rev. Proc. 81-6 (1981-1 CB 
620). The IRS and the Treasury Department agree that grantor reliance 
safe harbors, such as those noted, are still appropriate, but believe 
that this guidance is more appropriately provided in non-regulatory 
form, such as revenue procedures. Therefore, the final regulations do 
not incorporate this suggestion.
    However, the final regulations do restore, in Sec. Sec.  1.170A-
9(f)(5)(iii) and 1.509-3(e)(2)(ii), language that was inadvertently 
deleted from the proposed regulations giving limited grantor and donor 
reliance based on a written statement from the grantee organization.
    Section 4966 imposes an excise tax on a sponsoring organization of 
a donor advised fund (DAF) for each taxable distribution it makes from 
a DAF. Under section 4966(c), a taxable distribution generally is any 
distribution from a DAF to any natural person, or to any other person 
if (i) The distribution is for any purpose other than one specified in 
section 170(c)(2)(B), or (ii) the sponsoring organization maintaining 
the DAF does not exercise expenditure responsibility with respect to 
such distribution in accordance with section 4945(h). Among other 
things, a taxable distribution does not include a distribution from a 
DAF to any organization described in section 170(b)(1)(A) (other than a 
disqualified supporting organization).
    Notice 2006-109 (2006-2 C.B. 1121) requested comments on the 
application of the Pension Protection Act of 2006, Public Law 109-280 
(120 Stat. 780 (2006)) (PPA) to DAFs and supporting organizations. 
Several comments were received requesting that sponsoring organizations 
of DAFs be allowed to rely on an IRS ruling or determination of an 
organization's public charity status for various purposes, including 
for purposes of determining whether a distribution to an organization 
would be a taxable distribution under section 4966. The IRS and the 
Treasury Department agree that reliance relief for sponsoring 
organizations of DAFs is appropriate. Accordingly, the final 
regulations provide that, for purposes of section 4966, sponsoring 
organizations of DAFs may rely on an IRS determination letter or ruling 
that the organization is described in sections 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) and 
509(a)(1) or in section 509(a)(2) to the same extent as other grantors 
and contributors. The final regulations also allow sponsoring 
organizations of DAFs to rely on a favorable determination issued to a 
grantee that a grant is an unusual grant.

Private Foundation Termination

    Section 1.507-2 addresses private foundation terminations under 
section 507(b). The proposed regulations revised Sec.  1.507-2 to 
delete references to the four-year computation period and the 
transition rules related to 12-month terminations that are obsolete. 
Section 507(b)(1)(B) allows an organization to terminate its private 
foundation status by meeting the requirements of section 509(a)(1), 
(a)(2), or (a)(3) (and thus operating as a public charity) for a 
continuous period of 60 months, provided the organization (1) Prior to 
commencement of the 60-month period, notifies the Secretary in the 
manner prescribed by regulations that it is terminating private 
foundation status, and (2) later establishes to the satisfaction of the 
Secretary in a manner prescribed by regulations that it operated as a 
public charity during the 60-month period. The proposed regulations 
continued to provide that a terminating private foundation could 
request an advance ruling regarding its public charity status under 
Sec.  1.507-2T(d). The proposed regulations also retained the provision 
requiring terminating private foundations to provide sufficient 
information to the IRS

[[Page 55749]]

within 90 days of the end of the 60-month period to allow the IRS to 
make a determination on public charity status.
    The comment suggested that the final regulations should simplify 
the process of terminating private foundation status under Sec.  1.507-
2 by eliminating the requirement that an organization file certain 
information with the IRS within 90 days after completing the 60-month 
termination period. The comment observed that the IRS eliminated the 
Form 8734 filing requirement for newly-formed organizations with 
advance rulings, choosing instead to rely on the information reported 
on Schedule A to monitor public support.
    The final regulations do not incorporate this suggestion. In 
eliminating the advance ruling period and liberalizing the procedures 
for new organizations, the IRS took into consideration the experiential 
data indicating the high incidence of qualification for public charity 
status at the end of the advance ruling period. As stated in the notice 
of proposed rulemaking, approximately 95 percent of the organizations 
that received advance rulings later received definitive rulings that 
they were public charities. The IRS does not have analogous 
experiential data relating to organizations attempting to terminate 
private foundation status under section 507(b)(1)(B) to support a 
similar change in these procedures.
    In addition, if the organization fails to qualify as a public 
charity for the entire 60-month period, it will continue to be treated 
as a private foundation for the entire 60-month period. Thus, unlike a 
new organization that had an advance ruling as a public charity, an 
organization terminating its private foundation status continues to be 
classified as a terminating private foundation during the 60-month 
period and continues as such until the IRS receives and makes a 
determination on the organization's 90-day submission of information 
following the end of its advance ruling period.

Substantial Contributor

    The term ``substantial contributor,'' for purposes of Chapter 42, 
is defined under section 507(d)(2) and Sec.  1.507-6. The comment 
suggested that, given that a new organization that fails to qualify as 
publicly supported after its first five years of existence will not be 
treated as a private foundation for any purpose during its first five 
years, the final regulations should clarify whether, for purposes of 
Chapter 42, the identity of substantial contributors to the 
organization will be determined by taking into account contributions 
received while the organization was a public charity, or only 
contributions received after the date the organization is reclassified 
as a private foundation.
    Because section 1.507-6 is not within the scope of these final 
regulations, the final regulations do not incorporate this suggestion.

Miscellaneous

    In Sec.  1.170A-9(f), changes were made in the proposed regulation 
to clarify that the facts and circumstances test described in paragraph 
(f)(3) takes into account all pertinent facts and circumstances, and 
not just those listed in paragraph (f)(3)(iii); additional conforming 
changes were made in the final regulations. In Sec.  1.507-2, language 
inadvertently added to the proposed regulation when clarifying the 
factors for determining whether a grantee organization has an 
independent governing body was deleted. In addition, the final 
regulations include language conforming Sec.  1.6033-2(g) to the 
changes made to section 6033(a)(3)(B) of the Code under the PPA. Since 
the date of enactment of the PPA, August 17, 2006, the Commissioner's 
discretionary authority to relieve organizations from the annual filing 
requirement under section 6033(a) has not applied to supporting 
organizations described in section 509(a)(3) of the Code. Section 
1.6033-2(g)(6), which provides the general statement of the 
Commissioner's discretionary authority to relieve organizations from 
the annual filing requirement under section 6033(a), has been corrected 
to include the modifying language provided by the PPA in section 
6033(a)(3)(B). Sections 1.6033-2(g)(1)(iii) and 1.6033-2(g)(1)(iv) have 
been amended to include conforming changes. Several other incidental 
changes were made throughout the final regulations in order to increase 
clarity and consistency, none of which modify the substance of the 
proposed regulations.
    Additionally, the final regulations include a correction in Sec.  
1.6033-2(i) to the place to which an organization's change of operation 
notifications is sent.

Effective/Applicability Date and Transition Rules

    These final regulations generally are effective on September 8, 
2011, and generally apply to taxable years beginning on or after 
January 1, 2008. All organizations, including organizations that 
received a definitive ruling prior to the effective date of these 
regulations, must use the new five-year computation period to calculate 
public support for their first taxable year beginning on or after 
January 1, 2008, and for all subsequent taxable years.

Special Analyses

    It has been determined that this Treasury decision is not a 
significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866, as 
supplemented by Executive Order 13565. Therefore, a regulatory 
assessment is not required. It has also been determined that section 
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does 
not apply. It is hereby certified that the collection of information in 
this regulation will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. This certification is based on 
the fact that burden on tax-exempt entities will be reduced by (1) 
Eliminating the separate advance ruling process and the additional 
process for subsequently seeking a definitive ruling, (2) clarifying 
rules regarding the method of accounting and period for reporting 
certain items, and (3) providing discretion for the IRS to narrow or 
clarify circumstances under which reporting is required. Accordingly, a 
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 
U.S.C. chapter 6) is not required. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the 
Code, these regulations have been submitted to the Chief Counsel for 
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on its impact 
on small business.

Statement of Availability for Documents Published in the Internal 
Revenue Bulletin

    For copies of recently issued revenue procedures, revenue rulings, 
notices and other guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin 
or Cumulative Bulletin please visit the IRS Web site at https://www.irs.gov.

Drafting Information

    The principal author of this regulation is Terri Harris, Office of 
Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities). However, 
other personnel from the IRS and the Treasury Department participated 
in their development.

List of Subjects

26 CFR Part 1

    Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

26 CFR Part 602

    Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

[[Page 55750]]

Amendments to the Regulations

    Accordingly, 26 CFR parts 1 and 602 are amended as follows:

PART 1--INCOME TAXES

0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in 
part as follows:

    Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *


0
Par. 2. Section1.170A-9 is amended by revising paragraphs (f) and (k) 
to read as follows:


Sec.  1.170A-9  Definition of section 170(b)(1)(A) organization.

* * * * *
    (f) Definition of section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) organization--(1) In 
general. An organization is described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) if 
it--
    (i) Is referred to in section 170(c)(2) (other than an organization 
specifically described in paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section); 
and
    (ii) Normally receives a substantial part of its support from a 
governmental unit referred to in section 170(c)(1) or from direct or 
indirect contributions from the general public (``publicly 
supported''). For purposes of this paragraph (f), an organization is 
publicly supported if it meets the requirements of either paragraph 
(f)(2) of this section (33\1/3\ percent support test) or paragraph 
(f)(3) of this section (facts and circumstances test). Paragraph (f)(4) 
of this section defines ``normally'' for purposes of the 33\1/3\ 
percent support test and the facts and circumstances test, and for new 
organizations in the first five years of the organization's existence 
as a section 501(c)(3) organization. Paragraph (f)(5) of this section 
provides for determinations of foundation classification and rules for 
reliance by donors and contributors. Paragraphs (f)(6), (f)(7), and 
(f)(8) of this section list the items that are included and excluded 
from the term support. Paragraph (f)(9) of this section provides 
examples of the application of this paragraph. Types of organizations 
that, subject to the provisions of this paragraph (f), generally 
qualify under section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) as ``publicly supported'' are 
publicly or governmentally supported museums of history, art, or 
science, libraries, community centers to promote the arts, 
organizations providing facilities for the support of an opera, 
symphony orchestra, ballet, or repertory drama or for some other direct 
service to the general public.
    (2) Determination whether an organization is ``publicly 
supported''; 33\1/3\ percent support test. An organization is publicly 
supported if the total amount of support (see paragraphs (f)(6), 
(f)(7), and (f)(8) of this section) that the organization normally (see 
paragraph (f)(4)(i) of this section) receives from governmental units 
referred to in section 170(c)(1), from contributions made directly or 
indirectly by the general public, or from a combination of these 
sources, equals at least 33\1/3\ percent of the total support normally 
received by the organization. See paragraph (f)(9), Example 1 of this 
section.
    (3) Determination whether an organization is ``publicly 
supported''; facts and circumstances test. Even if an organization 
fails to meet the 33\1/3\ percent support test described in paragraph 
(f)(2) of this section, it is publicly supported if it normally (see 
paragraph (f)(4)(i) of this section) receives a substantial part of its 
support from governmental units, from contributions made directly or 
indirectly by the general public, or from a combination of these 
sources, and meets the other requirements of this paragraph (f)(3). In 
order to satisfy the facts and circumstances test, an organization must 
meet the requirements of paragraphs (f)(3)(i) and (f)(3)(ii) of this 
section. In addition, the organization must be in the nature of an 
organization that is publicly supported, taking into account all 
pertinent facts and circumstances, including the factors listed in 
paragraphs (f)(3)(iii)(A) through (f)(3)(iii)(E) of this section.
    (i) Ten-percent support limitation. The percentage of support (see 
paragraphs (f)(6), (f)(7) and (f)(8) of this section) normally received 
by an organization from governmental units, from contributions made 
directly or indirectly by the general public, or from a combination of 
these sources, must be substantial. For purposes of this paragraph 
(f)(3), an organization will not be treated as normally receiving a 
substantial amount of governmental or public support unless the total 
amount of governmental and public support normally received equals at 
least 10 percent of the total support normally received by such 
organization.
    (ii) Attraction of public support. An organization must be so 
organized and operated as to attract new and additional public or 
governmental support on a continuous basis. An organization will be 
considered to meet this requirement if it maintains a continuous and 
bona fide program for solicitation of funds from the general public, 
community, or membership group involved, or if it carries on activities 
designed to attract support from governmental units or other 
organizations described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(i) through 
(b)(1)(A)(vi). In determining whether an organization maintains a 
continuous and bona fide program for solicitation of funds from the 
general public or community, consideration will be given to whether the 
scope of its fundraising activities is reasonable in light of its 
charitable activities. Consideration will also be given to the fact 
that an organization, in its early years of existence, may limit the 
scope of its solicitation to persons deemed most likely to provide seed 
money in an amount sufficient to enable it to commence its charitable 
activities and expand its solicitation program.
    (iii) In addition to the requirements set forth in paragraphs 
(f)(3)(i) and (f)(3)(ii) of this section that must be satisfied, all 
pertinent facts and circumstances, including the following factors, 
will be taken into consideration in determining whether an organization 
is ``publicly supported'' within the meaning of paragraph (f)(1) of 
this section. However, an organization is not generally required to 
satisfy all of the factors in paragraphs (f)(3)(iii)(A) through 
(f)(3)(iii)(E) of this section. The factors relevant to each case and 
the weight accorded to any one of them may differ depending upon the 
nature and purpose of the organization and the length of time it has 
been in existence.
    (A) Percentage of financial support. The percentage of support 
received by an organization from public or governmental sources will be 
taken into consideration in determining whether an organization is 
``publicly supported.'' The higher the percentage of support above the 
10 percent requirement of paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section from 
public or governmental sources, the lesser will be the burden of 
establishing the publicly supported nature of the organization through 
other factors, including those described in this paragraph (f)(3), 
while the lower the percentage, the greater will be the burden. If the 
percentage of the organization's support from public or governmental 
sources is low because it receives a high percentage of its total 
support from investment income on its endowment funds, such fact will 
be treated as evidence of an organization being ``publicly supported'' 
if such endowment funds were originally contributed by a governmental 
unit or by the general public. However, if such endowment funds were 
originally contributed by a few individuals or members of their 
families, such fact will increase the burden on the organization of 
establishing that it is ``publicly supported'' taking into account all 
pertinent facts and circumstances,

[[Page 55751]]

including the other factors described in paragraph (f)(3)(iii) of this 
section.
    (B) Sources of support. The fact that an organization meets the 
requirement of paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section through support from 
governmental units or directly or indirectly from a representative 
number of persons, rather than receiving almost all of its support from 
the members of a single family, will be considered evidence of an 
organization being ``publicly supported.'' In determining what is a 
``representative number of persons,'' consideration will be given to 
the type of organization involved, the length of time it has been in 
existence, and whether it limits its activities to a particular 
community or region or to a special field which can be expected to 
appeal to a limited number of persons.
    (C) Representative governing body. The fact that an organization 
has a governing body which represents the broad interests of the 
public, rather than the personal or private interests of a limited 
number of donors (or persons standing in a relationship to such donors 
which is described in section 4946(a)(1)(C) through (a)(1)(G)), will be 
considered evidence of an organization being ``publicly supported.'' An 
organization will be treated as having a representative governing body 
if it has a governing body (whether designated in the organization's 
governing instrument or bylaws as a Board of Directors, Board of 
Trustees, or similar governing body) which is comprised of public 
officials acting in their capacities as such; of individuals selected 
by public officials acting in their capacities as such; of persons 
having special knowledge or expertise in the particular field or 
discipline in which the organization is operating; of community 
leaders, such as elected or appointed officials, clergymen, educators, 
civic leaders, or other such persons representing a broad cross-section 
of the views and interests of the community; or, in the case of a 
membership organization, of individuals elected pursuant to the 
organization's governing instrument or bylaws by a broadly based 
membership.
    (D) Availability of public facilities or services; public 
participation in programs or policies. (1) The fact that an 
organization generally provides facilities or services directly for the 
benefit of the general public on a continuing basis (such as a museum 
or library which holds open its building or facilities to the public, a 
symphony orchestra which gives public performances, a conservation 
organization which provides educational services to the public through 
the distribution of educational materials, or an old age home which 
provides domiciliary or nursing services for members of the general 
public) will be considered evidence that such organization is 
``publicly supported.''
    (2) The fact that an organization is an educational or research 
institution which regularly publishes scholarly studies that are widely 
used by colleges and universities or by members of the general public 
will also be considered evidence that such organization is ``publicly 
supported.''
    (3) The following factors will also be considered evidence that an 
organization is ``publicly supported'':
    (i) The participation in, or sponsorship of, the programs of the 
organization by members of the public having special knowledge or 
expertise, public officials, or civic or community leaders.
    (ii) The maintenance of a definitive program by an organization to 
accomplish its charitable work in the community, such as combating 
community deterioration in an economically depressed area that has 
suffered a major loss of population and jobs.
    (iii) The receipt of a significant part of its funds from a public 
charity or governmental agency to which it is in some way held 
accountable as a condition of the grant, contract, or contribution.
    (E) Additional factors pertinent to membership organizations. The 
following are additional factors to be considered in determining 
whether a membership organization is ``publicly supported'':
    (1) Whether the solicitation for dues-paying members is designed to 
enroll a substantial number of persons in the community or area, or in 
a particular profession or field of special interest (taking into 
account the size of the area and the nature of the organization's 
activities).
    (2) Whether membership dues for individual (rather than 
institutional) members have been fixed at rates designed to make 
membership available to a broad cross section of the interested public, 
rather than to restrict membership to a limited number of persons.
    (3) Whether the activities of the organization will be likely to 
appeal to persons having some broad common interest or purpose, such as 
educational activities in the case of alumni associations, musical 
activities in the case of symphony societies, or civic affairs in the 
case of parent-teacher associations. See Example 2 through Example 5 
contained in paragraph (f)(9) of this section for illustrations of this 
paragraph (f)(3).
    (4) Definition of normally; general rule--(i) Normally; 33\1/3\ 
percent support test. An organization ``normally'' receives the 
requisite amount of public support and meets the 33\1/3\ percent 
support test for a taxable year and the taxable year immediately 
succeeding that year, if, for the taxable year being tested and the 
four taxable years immediately preceding that taxable year, the 
organization meets the 33\1/3\ percent support test on an aggregate 
basis.
    (ii) Normally; facts and circumstances test. An organization 
``normally'' receives the requisite amount of public support and meets 
the facts and circumstances test of paragraph (f)(3) for a taxable year 
and the taxable year immediately succeeding that year, if, for the 
taxable year being tested and the four taxable years immediately 
preceding that taxable year, the organization meets the facts and 
circumstances test on an aggregate basis. In the case of paragraphs 
(f)(3)(iii)(A) and (f)(3)(iii)(B) of this section, facts pertinent to 
years preceding the five-year period may also be taken into 
consideration. The combination of factors set forth in paragraphs 
(f)(3)(iii)(A) through (f)(3)(iii)(E) of this section that an 
organization normally must meet does not have to be the same for each 
five-year period so long as there exists a sufficient combination of 
factors to show compliance with the facts and circumstances test.
    (iii) Special rule. The fact that an organization has normally met 
the requirements of the 33\1/3\ percent support test for a current 
taxable year, but is unable normally to meet such requirements for a 
succeeding taxable year, will not in itself prevent such organization 
from meeting the facts and circumstances test for such succeeding 
taxable year.

    (iv) Example. The application of paragraphs (f)(4)(i), (f)(4)(ii), 
and (f)(4)(iii) of this section may be illustrated by the following 
example:

    Example. (i) X is recognized as an organization described in 
section 501(c)(3). On the basis of support received during taxable 
years 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012, in the aggregate, X receives 
at least 33\1/3\ percent of its support from governmental units 
referred to in section 170(c)(1), from contributions made directly 
or indirectly by the general public, or from a combination of these 
sources. Consequently, X meets the 33\1/3\ percent support test for 
taxable year 2012 (the current taxable year). X also meets the 33\1/
3\ support test for 2013, as the immediately succeeding taxable 
year.

[[Page 55752]]

    (ii) In taxable years 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013, in the 
aggregate, X does not receive at least 33\1/3\ percent of its 
support from governmental units referred to in section 170(c)(1), 
from contributions made directly or indirectly by the general 
public, or from a combination of these sources. However, X still 
meets the 33\1/3\ percent support test for taxable year 2013 based 
on the aggregate support received for taxable years 2008 through 
2012.
    (iii) In taxable years 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014, in the 
aggregate, X does not receive at least 33\1/3\ percent of its 
support from governmental units referred to in section 170(c)(1), 
from contributions made directly or indirectly by the general 
public, or from a combination of these sources. X does not meet the 
33\1/3\ percent support test for taxable year 2014.
    (iv) X meets the facts and circumstances test for taxable year 
2013 and for taxable year 2014 (the immediately succeeding taxable 
year) based on the aggregate support X receives, X's fundraising 
program, and consideration of other factors, including those listed 
in paragraphs (f)(3)(iii)(A) through (f)(3)(iii)(E) of this section, 
during taxable years 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013. Therefore, 
even though X does not meet the 33\1/3\ percent support test for 
taxable year 2014, X is still an organization described in section 
170(b)(1)(A)(vi) for that year.

    (v) Normally; first five years of an organization's existence. (A) 
An organization ``normally'' receives the requisite amount of public 
support and meets the 33\1/3\ percent public support test or the facts 
and circumstances test during its first five taxable years as a section 
501(c)(3) organization if the organization can reasonably be expected 
to meet the requirements of the 33\1/3\ percent support test or the 
facts and circumstances test during that period. With respect to such 
organization's sixth taxable year, the general definition of normally 
set forth in paragraphs (f)(4)(i), (f)(4)(ii), and (f)(4)(iii) of this 
section apply. Alternatively, the organization shall be treated as 
``normally'' meeting the 33\1/3\ percent support test or the facts and 
circumstances test for its sixth taxable year (but not its seventh 
taxable year) if it meets the 33\1/3\ percent support test or the facts 
and circumstances test under the definition of normally set forth in 
paragraphs (f)(4)(i), (f)(4)(ii), and (f)(4)(iii) of this section for 
its fifth taxable year (based on support received in its first through 
fifth taxable years).
    (B) Basic consideration. In determining whether an organization can 
reasonably be expected (within the meaning of paragraph (f)(4)(v)(A) of 
this section) to meet the requirements of the 33\1/3\ percent support 
test or the facts and circumstances test during its first five taxable 
years, the basic consideration is whether its organizational structure, 
current or proposed programs or activities, and actual or intended 
method of operation are such as can reasonably be expected to attract 
the type of broadly based support from the general public, public 
charities, and governmental units that is necessary to meet such tests. 
The factors that are relevant to this determination, and the weight 
accorded to each of them, may differ from case to case, depending on 
the nature and functions of the organization. The information to be 
considered for this purpose shall consist of all pertinent facts and 
circumstances, including the factors set forth in paragraph (f)(3) of 
this section.

    (vi) Example. The application of paragraph (f)(4)(v) of this 
section may be illustrated by the following example:

    Example. (i) Organization Y was formed in January 2008, and uses 
a taxable year ending December 31. After September 9, 2008, and 
before December 31, 2008, Organization Y filed Form 1023 requesting 
recognition of exemption as an organization described in section 
501(c)(3) and in sections 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) and 509(a)(1). In its 
application, Organization Y established that it can reasonably be 
expected to operate as a publicly supported organization under 
paragraph (f)(2) or (f)(3) and paragraph (f)(4)(v) of this section. 
Subsequently, Organization Y received a ruling or determination 
letter that it is an organization described in section 501(c)(3) and 
sections 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) and 509(a)(1) effective as of the date of 
its formation.
    (ii) Organization Y is described in sections 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) 
and 509(a)(1) for its first five taxable years (the taxable years 
ending December 31, 2008, through December 31, 2012).
    (iii) Organization Y can qualify as a publicly supported 
organization for the taxable year ending December 31, 2013, if 
Organization Y can meet the requirements of either paragraph (f)(2) 
or paragraph (f)(3) of this section or Sec.  1.509(a)-3(a) and Sec.  
1.509(a)-(3)(b) for the taxable years ending December 31, 2009, 
through December 31, 2013, or for the taxable years ending December 
31, 2008, through December 31, 2012.

    (vii) Organizations reclassified as private foundations. (A) New 
publicly supported organizations. If a new publicly supported 
organization described under section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) cannot meet the 
requirements of the 33\1/3\ percent test of paragraph (f)(2) or the 
facts and circumstances test of paragraph (f)(3) for its sixth taxable 
year under the general definition of normally set forth in paragraphs 
(f)(4)(i), (f)(4)(ii), and (f)(4)(iii) of this section or under the 
alternate rule set forth in paragraph (f)(4)(v) of this section 
(effectively failing to meet a public support test for both its fifth 
and sixth taxable years), it will be treated as a private foundation as 
of the first day of its sixth taxable year only for purposes of 
sections 507, 4940, and 6033. Such an organization must file a Form 
990-PF, ``Return of Private Foundation or Section 4947(a)(1) Nonexempt 
Charitable Trust Treated as a Private Foundation,'' and will be liable 
for the net investment tax imposed by section 4940 and, if applicable, 
the private foundation termination tax imposed by section 507(c), for 
its sixth taxable year. For succeeding taxable years, the organization 
will be treated as a private foundation for all purposes.
    (B) Other publicly supported organizations. A publicly supported 
organization described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) (other than a new 
publicly supported organization described in paragraph (f)(4)(vii)(A) 
of this section) that has failed to meet both the 33\1/3\ percent 
support test and the facts and circumstances test for any two 
consecutive taxable years will be treated as a private foundation as of 
the first day of the second consecutive taxable year only for purposes 
of sections 507, 4940, and 6033. Such an organization must file a Form 
990-PF, ``Return of Private Foundation or Section 4947(a)(1) Nonexempt 
Charitable Trust Treated as a Private Foundation,'' and will be liable 
for the net investment tax imposed by section 4940 and, if applicable, 
the private foundation termination tax imposed by section 507(c), for 
the second consecutive failed taxable year. For succeeding taxable 
years, the organization will be treated as a private foundation for all 
purposes.
    (5) Determinations of foundation classification and reliance. (i) A 
ruling or determination letter that an organization is described in 
section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) may be issued to an organization. Such 
determination may be made in conjunction with the recognition of the 
organization's tax-exempt status or at such other time as the 
organization believes it is described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi). The 
ruling or determination letter that the organization is described in 
section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) may be revoked if, upon examination, the 
organization has not met the requirements of paragraph (f) of this 
section. The ruling or determination letter that the organization is 
described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) also may be revoked if the 
organization's application for a ruling or determination contained one 
or more material misstatements or omissions of fact or if such 
application was part of a scheme or plan to avoid or evade any 
provision of the Internal Revenue Code. The revocation of the 
determination that an organization is described in section 
170(b)(1)(A)(vi) does not preclude revocation of the

[[Page 55753]]

determination that the organization is described in section 501(c)(3).
    (ii) Status of grantors or contributors. For purposes of sections 
170, 507, 545(b)(2), 642(c), 4942, 4945, 4966, 2055, 2106(a)(2), and 
2522, grantors or contributors may rely upon a determination letter or 
ruling that an organization is described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) 
until the IRS publishes notice of a change of status (for example, in 
the Internal Revenue Bulletin or Publication 78, ``Cumulative List of 
Organizations described in Section 170(c) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986,'' which can be searched at https://www.irs.gov.) For this 
purpose, grantors or contributors also may rely on an advance ruling 
that expires on or after June 9, 2008. However, a grantor or 
contributor may not rely on such an advance ruling or any determination 
letter or ruling if the grantor or contributor was responsible for, or 
aware of, the act or failure to act that resulted in the organization's 
loss of classification under section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) or acquired 
knowledge that the IRS had given notice to such organization that it 
would be deleted from such classification.
    (iii) Reliance by grantors or contributors. A grantor or 
contributor, other than one of the organization's founders, creators, 
or foundation managers (within the meaning of section 4946(b)), will 
not be considered to be responsible for, or aware of, the act or 
failure to act that resulted in the loss of the organization's 
``publicly supported'' classification under section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi), 
if such grantor or contributor has made such grant or contribution in 
reliance upon a written statement by the grantee organization that such 
grant or contribution will not result in the loss of such 
organization's classification as a publicly supported organization as 
described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi). Such statement must be signed by 
a responsible officer of the grantee organization and must set forth 
sufficient information, including a summary of the pertinent financial 
data for the five taxable years immediately preceding the current 
taxable year, to assure a reasonably prudent person that his grant or 
contribution will not result in the loss of the grantee organization's 
classification as a publicly supported organization as described in 
section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi). If a reasonable doubt exists as to the effect 
of such grant or contribution, or if the grantor or contributor is one 
of the organization's founders, creators, or foundation managers, the 
procedure set forth in paragraph (f)(6)(iv) of this section for 
requesting a determination from the IRS may be followed by the grantee 
organization for the protection of the grantor or contributor.
    (6) Definition of support; meaning of general public--(i) In 
general. In determining whether the 33\1/2\ percent support test or the 
10 percent support limitation described in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this 
section is met, contributions by an individual, trust, or corporation 
shall be taken into account as support from direct or indirect 
contributions from the general public only to the extent that the total 
amount of the contributions by any such individual, trust, or 
corporation during the period described in paragraph (f)(4)(i) or 
paragraph (f)(4)(ii) of this section does not exceed two percent of the 
organization's total support for such period, except as provided in 
paragraph (f)(6)(ii) of this section. Therefore, for example, any 
contribution by one individual will be included in full in the 
denominator of the fraction determining the 33\1/2\ percent support or 
the 10 percent support limitation, but will be includible in the 
numerator of such fraction only to the extent that such amount does not 
exceed two percent of the denominator. In applying the two percent 
limitation, all contributions made by a donor and by any person or 
persons standing in a relationship to the donor that is described in 
section 4946(a)(1)(C) through (a)(1)(G) and the related regulations 
shall be treated as made by one person. The two percent limitation 
shall not apply to support received from governmental units referred to 
in section 170(c)(1) or to contributions from organizations described 
in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi), except as provided in paragraph (f)(6)(v) 
of this section. For purposes of paragraphs (f)(2), (f)(3)(i), and 
(f)(7)(iii)(A)(2) of this section, the term indirect contributions from 
the general public includes contributions received by the organization 
from organizations (such as section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) organizations) 
that normally receive a substantial part of their support from direct 
contributions from the general public, except as provided in paragraph 
(f)(6)(v) of this section. See the examples in paragraph (f)(9) of this 
section for the application of this paragraph (f)(6)(i). For purposes 
of this paragraph (f), the term contributions includes qualified 
sponsorship payments (as defined in Sec.  1.513-4) in the form of money 
or property (but not services).
    (ii) Exclusion of unusual grants. (A) For purposes of applying the 
two percent limitation described in paragraph (f)(6)(i) of this section 
to determine whether the 33\1/3\ percent support test or the 10 percent 
support limitation in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section is satisfied, 
one or more contributions may be excluded from both the numerator and 
the denominator of the applicable support fraction if such 
contributions meet the requirements of paragraph (f)(6)(iii) of this 
section. The exclusion provided by this paragraph (f)(6)(ii) is 
generally intended to apply to substantial contributions or bequests 
from disinterested parties, which contributions or bequests--
    (1) Are attracted by reason of the publicly supported nature of the 
organization;
    (2) Are unusual or unexpected with respect to the amount thereof; 
and
    (3) Would, by reason of their size, adversely affect the status of 
the organization as normally being publicly supported for the 
applicable period described in paragraph (f)(4) of this section.
    (B) In the case of a grant (as defined in Sec.  1.509(a)-3(g)) that 
meets the requirements of this paragraph (f)(6)(ii), if the terms of 
the granting instrument require that the funds be paid to the recipient 
organization over a period of years, the grant amounts received by the 
organization may be excluded for such year or years in which they would 
otherwise be includible in computing support under the method of 
accounting on the basis of which the organization regularly computes 
its income in keeping its books under section 446. However, no item of 
gross investment income may be excluded under this paragraph (f)(6). 
The provisions of this paragraph (f)(6) shall apply to exclude unusual 
grants made during any of the applicable periods described in paragraph 
(f)(4) or paragraph (f)(6) of this section. See paragraph (f)(6)(iv) of 
this section as to reliance by a grantee organization upon an unusual 
grant ruling under this paragraph (f)(6).
    (iii) Determining factors. In determining whether a particular 
contribution may be excluded under paragraph (f)(6)(ii) of this 
section, all pertinent facts and circumstances will be taken into 
consideration. No single factor will necessarily be determinative. For 
some of the factors similar to the factors to be considered, see Sec.  
1.509(a)-3(c)(4).
    (iv) Grantors and contributors. Prior to the making of any grant or 
contribution that will allegedly meet the requirements for exclusion 
under paragraph (f)(6)(ii) of this section, a potential grantee 
organization may request a determination whether such grant or 
contribution may be so excluded. Requests for such

[[Page 55754]]

determination may be filed by the grantee organization in the time and 
manner specified by revenue procedure or other guidance published in 
the Internal Revenue Bulletin. The issuance of such determination will 
be at the sole discretion of the Commissioner. The organization must 
submit all information necessary to make a determination on the factors 
referred to in paragraph (f)(6)(iii) of this section. If a favorable 
determination is issued, such determination may be relied upon by the 
grantor or contributor of the particular contribution in question for 
purposes of sections 170, 507, 545(b)(2), 642(c), 4942, 4945, 4966, 
2055, 2106(a)(2), and 2522 and by the grantee organization for purposes 
of paragraph (f)(6)(ii) of this section.
    (v) Grants from public charities. Pursuant to paragraph (f)(6)(i) 
of this section, contributions received from a governmental unit or 
from a section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) organization are not subject to the two 
percent limitation described in paragraph (f)(6)(i) of this section 
unless such contributions represent amounts which have been expressly 
or impliedly earmarked by a donor to such governmental unit or section 
170(b)(1)(A)(vi) organization as being for, or for the benefit of, the 
particular organization claiming section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) status. See 
Sec.  1.509(a)-3(j)(3) for examples illustrating the rules of this 
paragraph (f)(6)(v).
    (7) Definition of support; special rules and meaning of terms--(i) 
Definition of support. For purposes of this paragraph (f), the term 
``support'' shall be as defined in section 509(d) (without regard to 
section 509(d)(2)). The term ``support'' does not include--
    (A) Any amounts received from the exercise or performance by an 
organization of its charitable, educational, or other purpose or 
function constituting the basis for its exemption under section 501(a). 
In general, such amounts include amounts received from any activity the 
conduct of which is substantially related to the furtherance of such 
purpose or function (other than through the production of income); or
    (B) Contributions of services for which a deduction is not 
allowable.
    (ii) For purposes of the 33\1/3\ percent support test and the 10 
percent support limitation in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, all 
amounts received that are described in paragraph (f)(7)(i)(A) or 
paragraph (f)(7)(i)(B) of this section are to be excluded from both the 
numerator and the denominator of the fractions determining compliance 
with such tests, except as provided in paragraph (f)(7)(iii) of this 
section.
    (iii) Organizations dependent primarily on gross receipts from 
related activities. (A) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 
(f)(7)(i) of this section, an organization will not be treated as 
satisfying the 33\1/3\ percent support test or the 10 percent support 
limitation in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section if it receives--
    (1) Almost all of its support (as defined in section 509(d)) from 
gross receipts from related activities; and
    (2) An insignificant amount of its support from governmental units 
(without regard to amounts referred to in paragraph (f)(7)(i)(A) of 
this section) and contributions made directly or indirectly by the 
general public.
    (B) Example. The application of this paragraph (f)(7)(iii) may be 
illustrated by the following exa
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.