Indiana Michigan Power Company; Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 1; Exemption, 55422-55423 [2011-22806]
Download as PDF
55422
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 7, 2011 / Notices
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Chairman’s Introduction and Welcome
From the University of Arizona
National Science Board; Sunshine Act
Meetings; Notice
Open Session: 8 a.m.–8:15 a.m.
The National Science Board, pursuant
to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614),
the National Science Foundation Act, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n–5), and the
Government in the Sunshine Act (5
U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in
regard to the scheduling of meetings for
the transaction of National Science
Board business and other matters
specified, as follows:
AGENCY HOLDING MEETING: National
Science Board
DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, September 13,
2011, at 7:30 a.m.
PLACE: University of Arizona, Student
Union Memorial Center, Catalina and
Tucson Rooms, Tucson, Arizona
UPDATES & POINT OF CONTACT: Please
refer to the National Science Board
website https://www.nsf.gov/nsb for
additional information and schedule
updates (time, place, subject matter or
status of meeting) may be found at
https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/notices/.
AGENCY CONTACT: Jennie L. Moehlmann,
jmoehlma@nsf.gov, (703) 292–7000.
PUBLIC AFFAIRS CONTACT: Dana Topousis,
dtopousi@nsf.gov, (703) 292–7750.
STATUS:
CLOSED SESSION:
September 13, 2011
7:30 a.m.–7:45 a.m.
7:45 a.m.–8 a.m.
OPEN SESSIONS:
emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Open Session: 8:15 a.m.–9:30 a.m.
[FR Doc. 2011–23006 Filed 9–2–11; 4:15 pm]
• Presentations on STEM Education and
Outreach.
Moderator:
Dr. Leslie Tolbert, Vice President for
Research, Graduate Studies, and
Economic Development.
Speakers:
Mr. Phil Stokes, SAGUARO Program.
Dr. Jennie Scott, Director of Curriculum
and Articulation Services, Pima
Community College.
Dr. Maria Teresa Velez, Associate Dean,
Graduate College, University of
Arizona.
Dr. Randall Richardson, Professor SolidEarth Geophysics, University of
Arizona.
Dr. Sharon Hall, Assistant Professor,
School of Life Science, Arizona State
University.
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
CSB Subcommittee on Facilities (SCF)
Open Session: 9:30 a.m.–10 a.m.
• Chairman’s Remarks.
• Discuss COMPETES Mid-scale
Instrumentation task.
CPP Task Force on Unsolicited MidScale Research (MS)
Task Force on Merit Review (MR)
Open Session: 10:30 a.m.–11 a.m.
Thursday, September 13, 2011
ad hoc Committee on Nominations for
the Class of 2012–2018 (NOMS)
Closed Session: 7:30 a.m.–7:45 a.m.
• Approval of Minutes.
• Committee Chairman’s Remarks.
• Review and Approval of
Recommended list of NSB Nominees
for the Class of 2012–2018.
• Update on Committee Activities.
Plenary Executive Closed
Closed Session: 7:45 a.m.–8 a.m.
• Approval of Executive Closed Session
Minutes.
• Nominations Committee
Recommendations.
17:37 Sep 06, 2011
Ann Ferrante,
Writer-Editor.
• Approval of minutes.
• Discussion of extended outline of MS
Task Force final report.
• Update and discussion on the ongoing
and future plans of the Task Force.
MATTERS TO BE DISCUSSED:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Plenary Open
Open Session: 10 a.m.–10:30 a.m.
September 13, 2011
8 a.m.–8:15 a.m.
8:15 a.m.–9:30 a.m.
9:30 a.m.–10 a.m.
10 a.m.–10:30 a.m.
10:30 a.m.–11 a.m.
11:30 a.m.–12 Noon
Jkt 223001
• Director’s Report.
• Open Committee Reports.
• Chairman’s Closing Remarks.
• Approval of Minutes.
• Task Force Chairman’s Remarks.
• Discussion of Most Recent Draft of the
Merit Review Principles/Criteria.
• Discussion of the Draft Outline of the
Merit Review Task Force Report.
• Task Force Chairman’s Closing
Remarks.
CSB Task Force on Data Policies (DP)
Open Session: 11 a.m.–11:30 a.m.
• Chairman’s Remarks.
• Approval of minutes.
• Discussion of Recommendations for
changes to NSF’s Policies.
• Closing remarks from the Chairman.
Plenary Open
Open Session: 11:30 a.m.–12 Noon
• Approval of Open Session Minutes.
• Chairman’s Report.
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–315; NRC–2011–0188]
Indiana Michigan Power Company;
Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 1;
Exemption
1.0
Background
Indiana Michigan Power Company
(the licensee) is the holder of Facility
Operating License No. DPR–58, which
authorizes operation of the Donald C.
Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 (CNP–1).
The license provides, among other
things, that the facility is subject to all
rules, regulations, and orders of the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC,
the Commission) now or hereafter in
effect.
The facility consists of a pressurizedwater reactor located in Berrien County
in Michigan.
2.0
Request/Action
Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.12,
‘‘Specific exemptions,’’ the licensee has,
by letter dated December 16, 2010
(Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS)
Accession No. ML103630358),
requested an exemption from 10 CFR
50.46, ‘‘Acceptance criteria for
emergency core cooling systems for
light-water nuclear power reactors,’’ and
Appendix K to 10 CFR part 50, ‘‘ECCS
Evaluation Models.’’ The regulations in
10 CFR 50.46 contain acceptance
criteria for the emergency core cooling
system (ECCS) for reactors fueled with
zircaloy or ZIRLOTM cladding. In
addition, Appendix K to 10 CFR part 50
requires that the Baker-Just equation be
used to predict the rates of energy
release, hydrogen concentration, and
cladding oxidation from the metal/water
reaction. The Baker-Just equation
assumes the use of a zirconium alloy,
which is a material different from
Optimized ZIRLOTM. The licensee’s
requested exemption relates solely to
the specific types of cladding material
specified in these regulations. As
written, the regulations presume the use
of zircaloy or ZIRLOTM fuel rod
cladding. Thus, an exemption from the
requirements of 10 CFR 50.46 and
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 7, 2011 / Notices
Appendix K is needed to support the
use of a different fuel rod cladding
material. Accordingly, the licensee
requested an exemption that would
allow the use of Optimized ZIRLOTM
fuel rod cladding at CNP–1.
3.0 Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the
Commission may, upon application by
any interested person or upon its own
initiative, grant exemptions from the
requirements of 10 CFR Part 50 (1) when
the exemptions are authorized by law,
will not present an undue risk to public
health or safety, and are consistent with
the common defense and security; and
(2) when special circumstances are
present. Under 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2),
special circumstances include, among
other things, when application of the
specific regulation in the particular
circumstance would not serve, or is not
necessary to achieve, the underlying
purpose of the rule.
emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Authorized by Law
This exemption would allow the use
of Optimized ZIRLOTM fuel rod
cladding material at CNP–1. As stated
above, 10 CFR 50.12 allows the NRC to
grant exemptions from the requirements
of 10 CFR part 50. The NRC staff has
determined that granting of the
licensee’s proposed exemption will not
result in a violation of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as amended, or the
Commission’s regulations. Therefore,
the exemption is authorized by law.
No Undue Risk to Public Health and
Safety
The underlying purpose of 10 CFR
50.46 is to establish acceptance criteria
for ECCS performance. Westinghouse
topical reports WCAP–12610–P–A and
CENPD–404–P–A, Addendum 1–A,
‘‘Optimized ZIRLOTM,’’ dated July 2006,
contain the justification to use
Optimized ZIRLOTM fuel rod cladding
material in addition to Zircaloy-4 and
ZIRLOTM (these topical reports are nonpublicly available because they contain
proprietary information). The NRC staff
approved the use of these topical
reports, subject to the conditions stated
in the NRC staff’s safety evaluation for
each topical report. Ring compression
tests performed by Westinghouse on
Optimized ZIRLOTM were reviewed and
approved by the NRC staff (ADAMS
Accession No. ML062080569), and
demonstrate an acceptable retention of
post-quench ductility up to the 10 CFR
50.46 limits of 2200 degrees Fahrenheit
and 17 percent equivalent clad reacted.
Furthermore, the NRC staff has
concluded that oxidation measurements
provided by the licensee (ADAMS
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:37 Sep 06, 2011
Jkt 223001
Accession No. ML073130560) illustrate
that oxide thickness (and associated
hydrogen pickup) for Optimized
ZIRLOTM at any given burnup would be
less than that for both zircaloy and
ZIRLOTM. Hence, the NRC staff
concludes that Optimized ZIRLOTM
would be expected to maintain
improved post-quench ductility over
ZIRLOTM. Finally, the licensee stated
that Westinghouse will perform an
evaluation to ensure that the Optimized
ZIRLOTM fuel rods continue to satisfy
10 CFR 50.46 acceptance criteria
utilizing currently NRC-approved lossof-coolant accident (LOCA) models and
methods.
The underlying purpose of 10 CFR
part 50, Appendix K, Section I.A.5,
‘‘Metal-Water Reaction Rate,’’ is to
ensure that cladding oxidation and
hydrogen generation are appropriately
limited during a LOCA and
conservatively accounted for in the
ECCS evaluation model. Appendix K of
10 CFR Part 50 requires that the BakerJust equation be used in the ECCS
evaluation model to determine the rate
of energy release, cladding oxidation,
and hydrogen generation. Since the use
of the Baker-Just equation presumes the
use of zircaloy-clad fuel, strict
application of the rule would not permit
use of the equation for Optimized
ZIRLOTM cladding for determining
acceptable fuel performance.
Westinghouse has demonstrated that the
Baker-Just model is conservative in all
post-LOCA scenarios with respect to the
use of the Optimized ZIRLOTM
advanced alloy as a fuel cladding
material.
The NRC-approved topical reports
have demonstrated that predicted
chemical, thermal, and mechanical
characteristics of the Optimized
ZIRLOTM alloy cladding are bounded by
those approved for ZIRLOTM under
anticipated operational occurrences and
postulated accidents. Reload cores are
required to be operated in accordance
with the operating limits specified in
the technical specifications and the core
operating limits report.
Based on the above, no new accident
precursors are created by using
Optimized ZIRLOTM, thus, the
probability of postulated accidents is
not increased. Also, based on the above,
the consequences of postulated
accidents are not increased. Therefore,
there is no undue risk to public health
and safety due to using Optimized
ZIRLOTM.
Consistent With Common Defense and
Security
The proposed exemption would allow
the use of Optimized ZIRLOTM fuel rod
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
55423
cladding material at CNP–1. This
change to the plant configuration has no
relation to security issues. Therefore,
the common defense and security is not
impacted by this exemption.
Special Circumstances
Special circumstances, in accordance
with 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii), are present
whenever application of the regulation
in the particular circumstances is not
necessary to achieve the underlying
purpose of the rule. The underlying
purpose of 10 CFR 50.46 and Appendix
K to 10 CFR part 50 is to establish
acceptance criteria for ECCS
performance. The wording of the
regulations in 10 CFR 50.46 and
Appendix K is not directly applicable to
Optimized ZIRLOTM, even though the
evaluations above show that the intent
of the regulation is met. Therefore, since
the underlying purposes of 10 CFR
50.46 and Appendix K are achieved
through the use of Optimized ZIRLOTM
fuel rod cladding material, the special
circumstances required by 10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(ii) for the granting of an
exemption exist.
4.0
Conclusion
Accordingly, the Commission has
determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
50.12, the exemption is authorized by
law, will not present an undue risk to
the public health and safety, and is
consistent with the common defense
and security. Also, special
circumstances are present. Therefore,
the Commission hereby grants the
licensee an exemption from the
requirements of 10 CFR 50.46 and
Appendix K to 10 CFR Part 50, to allow
the use of Optimized ZIRLOTM fuel rod
cladding material at CNP–1.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the
Commission published an
environmental assessment for this
exemption on August 22, 2011 (76 FR
52356).
This exemption is effective upon
issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 24th day
of August 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Louise Lund,
Acting Director, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2011–22806 Filed 9–6–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 173 (Wednesday, September 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55422-55423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-22806]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-315; NRC-2011-0188]
Indiana Michigan Power Company; Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant,
Unit 1; Exemption
1.0 Background
Indiana Michigan Power Company (the licensee) is the holder of
Facility Operating License No. DPR-58, which authorizes operation of
the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 (CNP-1). The license provides,
among other things, that the facility is subject to all rules,
regulations, and orders of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the
Commission) now or hereafter in effect.
The facility consists of a pressurized-water reactor located in
Berrien County in Michigan.
2.0 Request/Action
Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR)
50.12, ``Specific exemptions,'' the licensee has, by letter dated
December 16, 2010 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS) Accession No. ML103630358), requested an exemption from 10 CFR
50.46, ``Acceptance criteria for emergency core cooling systems for
light-water nuclear power reactors,'' and Appendix K to 10 CFR part 50,
``ECCS Evaluation Models.'' The regulations in 10 CFR 50.46 contain
acceptance criteria for the emergency core cooling system (ECCS) for
reactors fueled with zircaloy or ZIRLO\TM\ cladding. In addition,
Appendix K to 10 CFR part 50 requires that the Baker-Just equation be
used to predict the rates of energy release, hydrogen concentration,
and cladding oxidation from the metal/water reaction. The Baker-Just
equation assumes the use of a zirconium alloy, which is a material
different from Optimized ZIRLO\TM\. The licensee's requested exemption
relates solely to the specific types of cladding material specified in
these regulations. As written, the regulations presume the use of
zircaloy or ZIRLO\TM\ fuel rod cladding. Thus, an exemption from the
requirements of 10 CFR 50.46 and
[[Page 55423]]
Appendix K is needed to support the use of a different fuel rod
cladding material. Accordingly, the licensee requested an exemption
that would allow the use of Optimized ZIRLO\TM\ fuel rod cladding at
CNP-1.
3.0 Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the Commission may, upon application by
any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant exemptions from
the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50 (1) when the exemptions are
authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to public health or
safety, and are consistent with the common defense and security; and
(2) when special circumstances are present. Under 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2),
special circumstances include, among other things, when application of
the specific regulation in the particular circumstance would not serve,
or is not necessary to achieve, the underlying purpose of the rule.
Authorized by Law
This exemption would allow the use of Optimized ZIRLO\TM\ fuel rod
cladding material at CNP-1. As stated above, 10 CFR 50.12 allows the
NRC to grant exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR part 50. The
NRC staff has determined that granting of the licensee's proposed
exemption will not result in a violation of the Atomic Energy Act of
1954, as amended, or the Commission's regulations. Therefore, the
exemption is authorized by law.
No Undue Risk to Public Health and Safety
The underlying purpose of 10 CFR 50.46 is to establish acceptance
criteria for ECCS performance. Westinghouse topical reports WCAP-12610-
P-A and CENPD-404-P-A, Addendum 1-A, ``Optimized ZIRLO\TM\,'' dated
July 2006, contain the justification to use Optimized ZIRLO\TM\ fuel
rod cladding material in addition to Zircaloy-4 and ZIRLO\TM\ (these
topical reports are non-publicly available because they contain
proprietary information). The NRC staff approved the use of these
topical reports, subject to the conditions stated in the NRC staff's
safety evaluation for each topical report. Ring compression tests
performed by Westinghouse on Optimized ZIRLO\TM\ were reviewed and
approved by the NRC staff (ADAMS Accession No. ML062080569), and
demonstrate an acceptable retention of post-quench ductility up to the
10 CFR 50.46 limits of 2200 degrees Fahrenheit and 17 percent
equivalent clad reacted. Furthermore, the NRC staff has concluded that
oxidation measurements provided by the licensee (ADAMS Accession No.
ML073130560) illustrate that oxide thickness (and associated hydrogen
pickup) for Optimized ZIRLO\TM\ at any given burnup would be less than
that for both zircaloy and ZIRLO\TM\. Hence, the NRC staff concludes
that Optimized ZIRLO\TM\ would be expected to maintain improved post-
quench ductility over ZIRLO\TM\. Finally, the licensee stated that
Westinghouse will perform an evaluation to ensure that the Optimized
ZIRLO\TM\ fuel rods continue to satisfy 10 CFR 50.46 acceptance
criteria utilizing currently NRC-approved loss-of-coolant accident
(LOCA) models and methods.
The underlying purpose of 10 CFR part 50, Appendix K, Section
I.A.5, ``Metal-Water Reaction Rate,'' is to ensure that cladding
oxidation and hydrogen generation are appropriately limited during a
LOCA and conservatively accounted for in the ECCS evaluation model.
Appendix K of 10 CFR Part 50 requires that the Baker-Just equation be
used in the ECCS evaluation model to determine the rate of energy
release, cladding oxidation, and hydrogen generation. Since the use of
the Baker-Just equation presumes the use of zircaloy-clad fuel, strict
application of the rule would not permit use of the equation for
Optimized ZIRLO\TM\ cladding for determining acceptable fuel
performance. Westinghouse has demonstrated that the Baker-Just model is
conservative in all post-LOCA scenarios with respect to the use of the
Optimized ZIRLO\TM\ advanced alloy as a fuel cladding material.
The NRC-approved topical reports have demonstrated that predicted
chemical, thermal, and mechanical characteristics of the Optimized
ZIRLO\TM\ alloy cladding are bounded by those approved for ZIRLO\TM\
under anticipated operational occurrences and postulated accidents.
Reload cores are required to be operated in accordance with the
operating limits specified in the technical specifications and the core
operating limits report.
Based on the above, no new accident precursors are created by using
Optimized ZIRLO\TM\, thus, the probability of postulated accidents is
not increased. Also, based on the above, the consequences of postulated
accidents are not increased. Therefore, there is no undue risk to
public health and safety due to using Optimized ZIRLO\TM\.
Consistent With Common Defense and Security
The proposed exemption would allow the use of Optimized ZIRLO\TM\
fuel rod cladding material at CNP-1. This change to the plant
configuration has no relation to security issues. Therefore, the common
defense and security is not impacted by this exemption.
Special Circumstances
Special circumstances, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii),
are present whenever application of the regulation in the particular
circumstances is not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the
rule. The underlying purpose of 10 CFR 50.46 and Appendix K to 10 CFR
part 50 is to establish acceptance criteria for ECCS performance. The
wording of the regulations in 10 CFR 50.46 and Appendix K is not
directly applicable to Optimized ZIRLO\TM\, even though the evaluations
above show that the intent of the regulation is met. Therefore, since
the underlying purposes of 10 CFR 50.46 and Appendix K are achieved
through the use of Optimized ZIRLO\TM\ fuel rod cladding material, the
special circumstances required by 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii) for the
granting of an exemption exist.
4.0 Conclusion
Accordingly, the Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
50.12, the exemption is authorized by law, will not present an undue
risk to the public health and safety, and is consistent with the common
defense and security. Also, special circumstances are present.
Therefore, the Commission hereby grants the licensee an exemption from
the requirements of 10 CFR 50.46 and Appendix K to 10 CFR Part 50, to
allow the use of Optimized ZIRLO\TM\ fuel rod cladding material at CNP-
1.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the Commission published an environmental
assessment for this exemption on August 22, 2011 (76 FR 52356).
This exemption is effective upon issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 24th day of August 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Louise Lund,
Acting Director, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of
Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2011-22806 Filed 9-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P