Alternate Passenger Rail Service Pilot Program, 55335-55343 [2011-22699]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 7, 2011 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Analysis of Regulatory Impacts. This
proposal is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ within the meaning of Executive
Order 12886. It is also not significant
within the definition in DOT’s
Regulatory Policies and Procedures, 49
FR 11034 (1979), in part because it does
not involve any change in important
Departmental policies. Because the
economic impact should be minimal,
further regulatory evaluation is not
necessary. Moreover, I certify that this
proposal would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, because the
reporting requirements, themselves, are
not changed and because it applies only
to information on individuals that is
maintained by the Federal Government.
This proposal would not significantly
affect the environment, and therefore an
environmental impact statement is not
required under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969. It has
also been reviewed under Executive
Order 12612, Federalism, and it has
been determined that it does not have
sufficient implications for Federalism to
warrant preparation of a Federalism
Assessment.
Collection of Information. This
proposal contains no collection of
information requirements under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.)
Unfunded Mandates. Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA), (Pub. L. 104–4, 109 Stat. 48),
requires Federal agencies to assess the
effects of certain regulatory actions on
information subject to the Act to information that
is relevant and necessary to carry out a lawful
activity of the agency that collects or maintains the
information. The exemption from (e)(1) means that
we are not limited to information that is relevant
and necessary. In practical terms, the subject may
contest the relevancy and necessity of any
information in the file; however, given the
exemption from (d), above, the subject has no way
to verify what is in the file, so is unable to contest
its relevancy or necessity. Hence, a formal
exemption from (e)(1) is not needed.
(e)(4)(G), (H), and (I)—To equip a subject to verify
information in a file, we are required by the Privacy
Act to publish in the public notice of the existence
of the information procedures informing subjects
how to learn from us whether we have records on
them, procedures on how subjects can gain access
to their files, and procedures to identify for subjects
the categories of record sources in the file. The
exemption from (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I) means that we
need not publish these procedures for this file.
Again, if we do not have to grant access, these
provisions have no meaning.
(f)—We are also required to publish regulations
governing how subjects can learn if they are
included in any of our Privacy Act files, how they
must prove their identities before we can grant
them access, and governing access to their files,
their rights to have information in the files
amended and their rights to appeal our refusal to
grant access and make amendments. Since there is
no right to access, these derivative rights, as with
the others, are moot.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Sep 06, 2011
Jkt 223001
State, local, and tribal governments, and
the private sector. UMRA requires a
written statement of economic and
regulatory alternatives for proposed and
final rules that contain Federal
mandates. A ‘‘Federal mandate’’ is a
new or additional enforceable duty,
imposed on any State, local, or tribal
government, or the private sector. If any
Federal mandate causes those entities to
spend, in aggregated, $100 million or
more in any one year (adjusted for
inflation) the UMRA analysis is
required. This proposal would not
impose Federal mandates on any State,
local, or tribal governments or the
private sector.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 10
Authority delegations (government
agencies); Organization and functions
(government agencies); Penalties;
Privacy; Transportation Department.
In consideration of the foregoing, DOT
proposes to amend Part 10 of Title 49,
Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
1. The authority citation for Part 10
would continue to read as follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 93–579; 49 U.S.C. 322.
2. The Appendix would be amended
by inserting in of Part II.A. a new
paragraph 8, immediately following
paragraph 7, to read as follows:
Appendix A—Exemptions.
Part II. Specific exemptions. A. The
following systems of records are exempt from
subsection (c)(3) (Accounting of Certain
Disclosures), (d) (Access to Records),
(e)(4)(G), (H), and (I) (Agency Requirements),
and (f) (Agency Rules) of 5 U.S.C. 552a, to
the extent that they contain investigatory
material compiled for law enforcement
purposes, in accordance 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2):
*
*
*
*
*
8. Suspicious Activity Reporting (SAR)
database, maintained by the Office of
Intelligence, Security, and Emergency
Response, Office of the Secretary.
Issued in Washington, DC, on: August 31,
2011.
Claire W. Barrett,
Departmental Chief Privacy Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011–22729 Filed 9–6–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–62–P
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
55335
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
49 CFR Part 269
[Docket No. FRA–2009–0108; Notice No. 1]
RIN 2130–AC19
Alternate Passenger Rail Service Pilot
Program
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This NPRM is in response to
a statutory mandate that FRA complete
a rulemaking proceeding to develop a
pilot program that permits a rail carrier
or rail carriers that own infrastructure
over which Amtrak operates certain
passenger rail service routes to petition
FRA to be considered as a passenger rail
service provider over such a route in
lieu of Amtrak for a period not to exceed
five years after the date of enactment of
the Passenger Rail Investment and
Improvement Act of 2008. The proposed
rule would develop this pilot program
in conformance with the statutory
directive.
SUMMARY:
Written Comments: Written
comments on the proposed rule must be
received by November 7, 2011.
Comments received after that date will
be considered to the extent possible
without incurring additional expense or
delay. FRA anticipates being able to
determine these matters without a
public hearing. However, if prior to
October 7, 2011, FRA receives a specific
request for a public hearing
accompanied by a showing that the
party is unable to adequately present his
or her position by written statement, a
hearing will be scheduled and FRA will
publish a supplemental notice in the
Federal Register to inform interested
parties of the date, time, and location of
any such hearing.
ADDRESSES: Comments: Comments
related to Docket Number FRA–2009–
0108, may be submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Ave., SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Room W12–140 on
the Ground level of the West Building,
1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., Washington,
DC between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through
Friday, except Federal Holidays.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\07SEP1.SGM
07SEP1
55336
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 7, 2011 / Proposed Rules
and performance metrics developed
under section 207 of PRIIA; FRA’s
execution of a contract with the winning
bidder awarding the right and obligation
to provide passenger rail service over
the route, along with an operating
subsidy, as well as requiring compliance
with the minimum standards
established under section 207 of PRIIA,
among other things; that Amtrak must
provide access to its reservation system,
stations, and facilities to a winning
bidder; that employees used in the
operation of a route under the pilot
program would be considered an
employee of that rail carrier and would
be subject to the applicable Federal laws
and regulations governing similar crafts
or classes of employees of Amtrak; that
the winning bidder must provide hiring
preference to displaced qualified
Amtrak employees; that the winning
bidder would be subject to the grant
conditions under 49 U.S.C. 24405; and
that, if a winning bidder ceases to
operate the service or to otherwise fulfill
their obligations, the FRA
Administrator, in collaboration with the
Surface Transportation Board, would
take any necessary action to enforce the
contract and to ensure the continued
provision of service.
I. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number or Regulatory Identification
Number (RIN) for this rulemaking. Note
that all comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information. Please see the
Privacy Act heading later in this
document for more Privacy Act
information.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov at any time, or to
room W12–140 on the Ground level of
the West Building, 1200 New Jersey
Ave., SE., Washington, DC between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alexander Roth, Office of Railroad
Policy and Development, FRA, 1200
New Jersey Ave., SE., Washington, DC
20590 (Telephone 202–493–6109), or
Zeb Schorr, Attorney-Advisor, Office of
Chief Counsel, FRA, 1200 New Jersey
Ave., SE., Mail Stop 10, Washington, DC
20590 (Telephone 202–493–6072).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Section 214 provides that, before FRA
may take any action allowed under 49
U.S.C. 24711, the Secretary of
Transportation (Secretary) must certify
that the FRA Administrator has
sufficient resources that are adequate to
undertake the pilot program. FRA
understands this requirement to mean
that FRA may not proceed with any
action under a pilot program developed
by this proposed rulemaking until the
Secretary has issued such a certification.
It should also be noted that section
214 requires FRA to award to a winning
bidder, among other things, an operating
subsidy. 49 U.S.C. 24711(a)(5)(B). PRIIA
did not authorize funds for FRA to use
to pay for any such operating subsidy,
or any other costs arising from the
proposed pilot program; nor did
Congress appropriate funds for the pilot
program.
This proposed rulemaking would
incorporate the adequate resources
certification requirement by providing,
in § 269.3(a), that the part would not be
applicable to any railroad, unless and
until the Secretary certifies that FRA has
sufficient resources that are adequate to
undertake the pilot program. Only upon
such certification would the proposed
pilot program become available. As
described below, the time period within
which petitions may be filed with FRA
A. Statutory Background
The proposed rule is in response to a
statutory mandate—specifically, § 214 of
the Passenger Rail Investment and
Improvement Act of 2008 (PRIIA),
Public Law No. 110–432, Division B
(Oct. 16, 2008)—that FRA complete a
rulemaking proceeding to develop a
pilot program that permits a rail carrier
or rail carriers that own infrastructure
over which Amtrak operates certain
passenger rail service routes to petition
FRA to be considered as a passenger rail
service provider over such a route in
lieu of Amtrak for a period not to exceed
five years after the date of enactment of
PRIIA. Section 214 further provides that
those routes described in 49 U.S.C.
24102(5)(B), (C), and (D) and in 49
U.S.C. 24702 are eligible for the pilot
program, and that the program not be
made available to more than two routes.
Section 214 also provides for, among
other things, the following: The
establishment of a petition, notification,
and bid process through which FRA
would evaluate bids to provide
passenger rail service over particular
routes by interested rail carriers and
Amtrak; FRA’s selection of a winning
bidder by, among other things,
evaluating the bids against the financial
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Sep 06, 2011
Jkt 223001
B. Adequate Resources Certification
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
would be triggered by FRA providing
notice of the Secretary’s certification.
C. Timeline Established by the Proposed
Rule
The proposed rule would establish
deadlines for filing petitions, filing bids,
and FRA’s execution of contract(s) with
any winning bidders. As to the filing of
petitions, § 269.7(b) of the proposed rule
would require a petition to be filed with
FRA no later than 45 days after FRA
provides notice of the Secretary’s
certification that the FRA Administrator
has sufficient resources that are
adequate to undertake the pilot
program. This deadline is necessary in
order to comply with the statutory
mandate. Specifically, 49 U.S.C.
24711(a)(4) requires FRA to, as relevant
here, ‘‘give preference in awarding
contracts to bidders seeking to operate
routes that have been identified as one
of the five worst performing Amtrak
routes under section 24710’’ of title 49
of the United States Code. In order to
comply with this statutory directive to
‘‘give preference’’ to ‘‘the five worst
performing Amtrak routes,’’ FRA must
be able to evaluate all bids at the same
time. Section 269.7(b)’s proposed
petition deadline would enable FRA to
evaluate all bids at the same time and
to ‘‘give preference’’ where appropriate
as directed by the statute.
In addition, §§ 269.3(c) and 269.7(d)
of the proposal would also take into
consideration the possibility that the
period during which a railroad may
provide passenger rail service under this
proposed pilot program, which is
currently set by statute to expire on
October 16, 2013, is extended by statute.
In that event, the proposed rule would
require petitions to be filed with FRA no
later than 60 days after the enactment of
such statutory authority and would
require such petitions to otherwise
comply with the requirements of this
part.
As to the filing of bids, proposed
§ 269.9 would require the Petitioner and
Amtrak to both file bids with FRA no
later than 60 days after the petition
deadline established by proposed
§ 269.7(b). Proposed § 269.9(b)
articulates the bid requirements. The
60-day time period would give a bidder
sufficient time to prepare a bid that
satisfies the bid requirements, while
also limiting the duration of the bid
process.
Lastly, as to the award and execution
of contracts with winning bidders,
proposed § 269.13 would require FRA to
execute a contract with the winning
bidder(s) no later than 90 days after the
bid deadline established by proposed
§ 269.9. Section 214 of PRIIA requires
E:\FR\FM\07SEP1.SGM
07SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 7, 2011 / Proposed Rules
FRA to ‘‘execute a contract within a
specified, limited time.’’ 49 U.S.C.
24711(a)(5). The 90-day time period is a
limited period for FRA and the winning
bidder(s) to execute an agreement(s) that
satisfies the proposed requirements of
§ 269.13, including FRA’s obligation of
an operating subsidy in compliance
with the statutory requirements.
II. Section-by-Section Analysis
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Section 269.1 Purpose
This section provides that the
proposed rule would carry out the
statutory mandate set forth in 49 U.S.C.
24711 that requires FRA to develop a
pilot program that permits a rail carrier
or rail carriers that own infrastructure
over which Amtrak operates a passenger
rail service route to petition FRA to be
considered as a passenger rail service
provider over that route in lieu of
Amtrak.
Section 269.3 Application
Paragraph (a) of this section provides
that the proposed rule would not apply
to any railroad, unless and until the
Secretary certifies that FRA has
sufficient resources that are adequate to
undertake the pilot program. This
section also states that, upon receipt,
FRA will provide notice of the
certification on the FRA public Web
site. This proposed paragraph is based
on the statutory directive in 49 U.S.C.
24711(e). In addition, as discussed in
§ 269.7(a) of the proposal, FRA’s notice
of the Secretary’s certification will
trigger the 45-day deadline by which an
eligible railroad may petition FRA
under the pilot program.
Paragraph (b) of this section provides
that the proposed pilot program would
not be made available to more than two
Amtrak intercity passenger rail routes.
This proposed paragraph is based on the
statutory directive contained in 49
U.S.C. 24711(b).
Paragraph (c) of this section proposes
that any rail carrier or rail carriers
awarded a contract to provide passenger
rail service under the pilot program
would only be able to provide such
service for a period not to exceed five
years after October 16, 2008 (the date of
PRIIA’s enactment), or a later date
authorized by statute. This proposed
paragraph is based on the statutory
directive contained in 49 U.S.C.
24711(a)(1). In addition, this proposed
section also takes into consideration the
possibility that the 5-year limitation
period established in PRIIA is extended
by statute.
Section 269.5 Definitions
This section contains the definitions
that FRA proposes to employ in this
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Sep 06, 2011
Jkt 223001
rule. This section proposes definitions
the following terms: Act; Administrator;
Amtrak; File and filed; Financial plan;
FRA; Operating plan; Passenger rail
service route; Petitioner; Railroad, and
Secretary. Among other definitions, this
section proposes to define ‘‘passenger
rail service route’’ to mean those routes
described in 49 U.S.C. 24102(5)(B), (C),
and (D) and in 49 U.S.C. 24702. This
definition is based on the statutory
directive contained in 49 U.S.C.
24711(a)(1). In addition, this section
proposes to define ‘‘railroad’’ to mean a
rail carrier or rail carriers, as defined in
49 U.S.C. 10102(5). This definition is
based on the statutory directive
contained in 49 U.S.C. 24711(a)(1) and
(c)(3).
This section also proposes to define
‘‘financial plan’’ to mean a plan that
contains, for each Federal fiscal year
fully or partially covered by the bid: An
annual projection of the revenues,
expenses, capital expenditure
requirements, and cash flows (from
operating activities, investing activities,
and financing activities, showing
sources and uses of funds) attributable
to the route; and a statement of the
assumptions underlying the financial
plan’s contents. In addition, this
proposed section defines ‘‘operating
plan’’ to mean a plan that contains, for
each Federal fiscal year fully or partially
covered by the bid: A complete
description of the service planned to be
offered, including the train schedules,
frequencies, equipment consists, fare
structures, and such amenities as
sleeping cars and food service
provisions; station locations; hours of
operation; provisions for
accommodating the traveling public,
including proposed arrangements for
stations shared with other routes;
expected ridership; passenger-miles;
revenues by class of service between
each city-pair proposed to be served;
and a statement of the assumptions
underlying the operating plan’s
contents. The proposed rule would
require bidders to include a financial
plan and an operating plan—as those
terms are defined here—in their bids.
These proposed definitions would
ensure that bids contain sufficient
information to be evaluated.
Section 269.7 Petitions
Paragraph (a) of this section proposes
that a railroad that owns infrastructure
over which Amtrak operates a passenger
rail service route may petition FRA to be
considered as a passenger rail service
provider over that route in lieu of
Amtrak for a period of time consistent
with the time limitations described in
section 269.3(c). This proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
55337
paragraph is based on the statutory
directive contained in 49 U.S.C.
24711(a)(1). This paragraph would not
require a railroad own all of the
infrastructure over which Amtrak
operates a passenger rail service route in
order to file a petition.
Paragraph (b) of this section proposes
that a petition submitted to FRA under
this rule must: Be filed with FRA no
later than 45 days after FRA provides
notice of the Secretary’s certification
pursuant to proposed § 269.3(a);
describe the petition as a ‘‘Petition to
Provide Passenger Rail Service under 49
CFR part 269’’; and describe the route or
routes over which the petitioner wants
to provide passenger rail service and the
Amtrak service that the petitioner wants
to replace. This proposed paragraph is
intended to ensure that a petition would
provide clear notice to FRA.
Paragraph (c) of this section proposes
that, in the event that a later statute
extends the time period under which a
railroad may provide passenger rail
service pursuant to the pilot program,
petitions would have to be filed with
FRA no later than 60 days after the later
of the enactment of such statutory
authority or the Secretary’s issuance of
the certification under § 269.3(a), and
that the petition must otherwise comply
with the requirements of the pilot
program. This proposed paragraph takes
into consideration the possibility that
the 5-year limitations period established
in PRIIA is extended by statute.
Section 269.9 Bid Process
Paragraph (a) of this section proposes
that FRA would notify Amtrak of any
eligible petition filed with FRA no later
than 30 days after FRA’s receipt of such
petition. This proposed paragraph is
based on the statutory directive
contained in 49 U.S.C. 24711(a)(2).
Paragraph (b) of this section describes
the proposed bid requirements,
including a requirement that such bids
must be filed with FRA no later than 60
days after the petition deadline
established by proposed § 269.7.
Paragraph (b) further proposes that such
bids must: (1) Provide FRA with
sufficient information to evaluate the
level of service described in the
proposal, and to evaluate the proposal’s
compliance with the requirements
described in proposed § 269.13(b); (2)
describe how the bidder would operate
the route (including an operating plan,
a financial plan and, if applicable, any
agreement(s) necessary for the operation
of passenger service over right-of-way
on the route that is not owned by the
railroad), and, if the bidder intends to
generate any revenues from ancillary
activities (i.e., activities other than
E:\FR\FM\07SEP1.SGM
07SEP1
55338
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 7, 2011 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
passenger transportation,
accommodations, and food service) as
part of its proposed operation of the
route, then the bidder must fully
describe such ancillary activities and
identify their incremental impact in all
relevant sections of the operating plan
and the financial plan, and on the
route’s performance under the financial
and performance metrics developed
pursuant to section 207 of the Act,
together with the assumptions
underlying the estimates of such
incremental impacts; (3) describe what
Amtrak passenger equipment would be
needed, if any; (4) describe in detail,
including amounts, timing, and
intended purpose, what sources of
Federal and non-Federal funding the
bidder would use, including but not
limited to any Federal or State operating
subsidy and any other Federal or State
payments; (5) contain a staffing plan
describing the number of employees
needed to operate the service, the job
assignments and requirements, and the
terms of work for prospective and
current employees of the bidder for the
service outlined in the bid; and (6)
describe how the passenger rail service
would comply with the financial and
performance metrics developed
pursuant to section 207 of the Act (at a
minimum, this description must
include, for each Federal fiscal year
fully or partially covered by the bid: a
projection of the route’s expected ontime performance and train delays
according to the metrics developed
pursuant to section 207 of the Act; and
the net cash used in operating activities
per passenger-mile attributable to the
route). This proposed paragraph is
based on the statutory directive
contained in 49 U.S.C. 24711(a)(3) and
(a)(6).
Paragraph (c) of this section proposes
that FRA could request supplemental
information from a petitioner and/or
Amtrak where FRA determines such
information is needed to evaluate a bid.
In such a request, FRA would establish
a deadline by which the supplemental
information must be submitted to FRA.
This proposed paragraph allows FRA to
request additional information where
the information provided in a bid
prevents FRA from adequately
evaluating the proposal.
Section 269.11 Evaluation
This section proposes that FRA would
select a winning bidder by evaluating
the bids against the financial and
performance metrics developed under
section 207 of PRIIA and the
requirements of this proposed part, and
would give preference in awarding
contracts to bidders seeking to operate
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Sep 06, 2011
Jkt 223001
routes that have been identified as one
of the five worst performing Amtrak
routes under 49 U.S.C. 24710. This
proposed paragraph is based on the
statutory directive contained in 49
U.S.C. 24711(a)(4).
Section 269.13 Award
Paragraph (a) of this section proposes
that FRA would execute a contract with
the winning bidder(s) consistent with
the requirements of proposed § 269.13
and as FRA may otherwise require, no
later than 90 days after the bid deadline
established by proposed § 269.9(b). This
paragraph also provides that FRA would
provide timely notice of these selections
to all petitioners and to Amtrak. This
proposed paragraph is based on the
statutory directive contained in 49
U.S.C. 24711(a)(5).
Paragraph (b) of this section proposes
that, among other things, such a contract
would: (1) Award to the winning bidder
the right and obligation to provide
passenger rail service over that route
subject to such performance standards
as FRA may require, consistent with the
standards developed under section 207
of PRIIA; (2) award to the winning
bidder an operating subsidy for the first
year at a level not in excess of the level
in effect during the fiscal year preceding
the fiscal year in which the petition was
received, adjusted for inflation, and for
any subsequent years at such level,
adjusted for inflation; (3) condition the
operating and subsidy rights upon the
winning bidder continuing to provide
passenger rail service on the route that
is no less frequent, nor over a shorter
distance, than Amtrak provided on that
route before the award; (4) condition the
operating and subsidy rights upon the
winning bidder’s compliance with the
minimum standards established under
section 207 of PRIIA and such
additional performance standards as
FRA may establish; and (5) subject the
winning bidder to the grant conditions
established by 49 U.S.C. 24405. This
proposed paragraph is based on the
statutory directive contained in 49
U.S.C. 24711(a)(5), (c)(1), and (c)(4).
Paragraph (c) of this section proposes
that the winning bidder would make
their staffing plan, submitted as
required by proposed § 269.9(b)(4),
available to the public after the bid
award. This proposed paragraph is
based on the statutory directive
contained in 49 U.S.C. 24711(a)(6).
Section 269.15 Access to Facilities;
Employees
Paragraph (a) of this section proposes
that, if an award under proposed
§ 269.13 is made to a rail carrier other
than Amtrak, Amtrak must provide
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
access to its reservation system, stations,
and facilities directly related to
operations to the winning bidder
awarded a contract, in accordance with
section 217 of PRIIA, necessary to carry
out the purposes of the proposed rule.
This proposed paragraph is based on the
statutory directive contained in 49
U.S.C. 24711(c)(2).
Paragraph (b) of this section proposes
that the employees of any person used
by a rail carrier in the operation of a
route under the proposed rule would be
considered an employee of that carrier
and subject to the applicable Federal
laws and regulations governing similar
crafts or classes of employees of Amtrak,
including provisions under § 121 of the
Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act
of 1997 relating to employees that
provide food and beverage service. This
proposed paragraph is based on the
statutory directive contained in 49
U.S.C. 24711(c)(3).
Paragraph (c) of this section proposes
that a winning bidder would provide
hiring preference to qualified Amtrak
employees displaced by the award of
the bid, consistent with the staffing plan
submitted by the winning bidder. This
proposed paragraph is based on the
statutory directive contained in 49
U.S.C. 24711(c)(4).
Section 269.17
Cessation of Service
This section proposes that, if a rail
carrier awarded a route under this rule
ceases to operate the service or fails to
fulfill its obligations under the contract
required under proposed § 269.13, the
Administrator, in collaboration with the
Surface Transportation Board, will take
any necessary action consistent with
title 49 of the United States Code to
enforce the contract and ensure the
continued provision of service,
including the installment of an interim
service provider and re-bidding the
contract to operate the service. This
section further proposes that the entity
providing service would either be
Amtrak or a rail carrier eligible for the
pilot program under proposed § 269.7.
This proposed paragraph is based on the
statutory directive contained in 49
U.S.C. 24711(d).
III. Regulatory Impact and Notices
1. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
and DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures
This proposed rule has been
evaluated in accordance with existing
policies and procedures and determined
to be non-significant under Executive
Order 12866, Executive Order 13563,
and DOT policies and procedures. See
44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979. FRA
E:\FR\FM\07SEP1.SGM
07SEP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 7, 2011 / Proposed Rules
has prepared and placed in the docket
a regulatory impact analysis (RIA)
addressing the economic impact of this
proposed rule. Document inspection
and copying facilities are available at
the DOT Central Docket Management
Facility located in Room W12–140 on
the Ground level of the West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. Docket material
is also available for inspection
electronically through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. Photocopies may
also be obtained by submitting a written
request to the FRA Docket Clerk at the
Office of Chief Counsel, RCC–10, Mail
Stop 10, Federal Railroad
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590;
please refer to Docket No. FRA–2009–
0108.
As part of the regulatory impact
analysis, FRA has generally assessed
quantitative measurements of the cost
and benefit streams expected to result
from the adoption of a proposed rule.
However, in this case, due to the limited
number of routes that would be awarded
under the pilot program (only two
routes could be awarded), and the short
timeframe in which this pilot program
would operate (until 2013), it is not
feasible to perform an analysis for an
extended period.
There are no alternate service
provider railroad regulatory costs
because the program is voluntary with
respect to such rail carriers. Regulatory
costs would be triggered for Amtrak
should one or more alternative service
providers bid on routes. For
informational purposes, FRA has
included in Appendices of the RIA the
estimated average costs for both a
railroad and Amtrak to participate in the
pilot program. FRA estimates the
average cost for each individual railroad
to participate in the program and to
submit the required bid proposal (the
majority of the cost) at about $300,000
per route, and the average cost for
Amtrak at about $150,000 per route
(regardless of how many individual
railroads bid on the individual Amtrak
route). Railroads that participate
voluntarily would do so because they
consider the benefits to exceed the
costs. Thus, any participation would be
cost beneficial with respect to the
voluntary participant. Any potential
costs to Amtrak are regulatory costs that
would not be incurred in absence of this
proposed rule or the costs associated
with developing bids for up to two
routes.
Given that this pilot program is
voluntary for potential alternate service
providers and is not currently funded by
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Sep 06, 2011
Jkt 223001
Congress, FRA estimates that this
proposed regulation would not result in
any benefits or costs.
2. Regulatory Flexibility Act
To ensure potential impacts of rules
on small entities are properly
considered, FRA developed this
proposed rule in accordance with
Executive Order 13272 (‘‘Proper
Consideration of Small Entities in
Agency Rulemaking’’) and DOT’s
procedures and policies to promote
compliance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires
an agency to review regulations to
assess their impact on small entities. An
agency must conduct a regulatory
flexibility analysis unless it determines
and certifies that a rule is not expected
to have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Purpose
As noted earlier in this NPRM, the
purpose of this proposed rulemaking is
to respond to a statutory mandate to
develop a pilot program that permits a
rail carrier or rail carriers that own
infrastructure over which Amtrak
operates certain passenger rail service
routes to petition FRA to be considered
as a passenger rail service provider over
such a route in lieu of Amtrak for a
period not to exceed five years after the
date of enactment of PRIIA. The
proposed rule would develop this pilot
program in conformance with the
statutory directive.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires a review
of proposed and final rules to assess
their impact on small entities, unless
the Secretary certifies that the rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Pursuant to § 312 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
FRA has issued a final policy that
formally establishes ‘‘small entities’’ as
including railroads that meet the linehaulage revenue requirements of a Class
III railroad. 49 CFR part 209, App. C.
For other entities, the same dollar limit
in revenues governs whether a railroad,
contractor, or other respondent is a
small entity. Id. Additionally, section
601(5) defines as ‘‘small entities’’
governments of cities, counties, towns,
townships, villages, school districts, or
special districts with populations less
than 50,000. Such governments would
not be directly impacted by this
proposal.
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
55339
Rationale for Choosing Regulatory
Action and Legal Authority
FRA is initiating this NPRM in
response to a statutory mandate set forth
in section 214 of PRIIA. Section 214
requires FRA to complete a rulemaking
proceeding to develop a pilot program
that permits a rail carrier or rail carriers
that own infrastructure over which
Amtrak operates certain passenger rail
service routes to petition FRA to be
considered as a passenger rail service
provider over such a route in lieu of
Amtrak for a period not to exceed five
years after the date of enactment of
PRIIA. This proposed rule develops this
pilot program in conformance with the
statutory directive.
Description of Regulated Entities and
Impacts
This proposed rule would be
applicable to railroads that own
infrastructure upon which Amtrak
operates those routes described in 49
U.S.C. 24102(5)(B), (C), and (D) and in
49 U.S.C. 24702, which may include
small railroads. ‘‘Small entity’’ is
defined in 5 U.S.C. 601 as including a
small business concern that is
independently owned and operated, and
is not dominant in its field of operation.
The U.S. Small Business Administration
(SBA) has authority to regulate issues
related to small businesses, and
stipulates in its size standards that a
‘‘small entity’’ in the railroad industry is
a for profit ‘‘line-haul railroad’’ that has
fewer than 1,500 employees, a ‘‘short
line railroad’’ with fewer than 500
employees, or a ‘‘commuter rail system’’
with annual receipts of less than seven
million dollars. See ‘‘Size Eligibility
Provisions and Standards,’’ 13 CFR part
121 subpart A.
Federal agencies may adopt their own
size standards for small entities in
consultation with SBA and in
conjunction with public comment.
Pursuant to that authority FRA has
published a final statement of agency
policy that formally establishes ‘‘small
entities’’ or ‘‘small businesses’’ as being
railroads, contractors and hazardous
materials shippers that meet the revenue
requirements of a Class III railroad as set
forth in 49 CFR 1201.1–1, which is $20
million or less in inflation-adjusted
annual revenues, and commuter
railroads or small governmental
jurisdictions that serve populations of
50,000 or less. See 68 FR 24891 (May 9,
2003) (codified at Appendix C to 49 CFR
part 209). The $20 million limit is based
on the Surface Transportation Board’s
revenue threshold for a Class III railroad
carrier. Railroad revenue is adjusted for
inflation by applying a revenue deflator
E:\FR\FM\07SEP1.SGM
07SEP1
55340
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 7, 2011 / Proposed Rules
formula in accordance with 49 CFR
1201.1–1. FRA is using this definition
for the proposed rule.
Minimum Requirements for Pilot
Program Applications
Small railroads face the same
requirements for entry in the pilot
program as other railroads. The railroad
must own infrastructure upon which
Amtrak operates those routes described
in 49 U.S.C. 24102(5)(B), (C), and (D)
and in 49 U.S.C. 24702.
Disclosure of Assumptions
The purpose of this economic analysis
is to provide pertinent information on
the effects of the proposed regulation,
part 269, ‘‘Alternate Passenger Rail
Service Pilot Program.’’ FRA believes
that the proposed regulation will not
have any effect on small railroads since
participation in the pilot program is
voluntary, only two routes are available
for award, the program expires in 2013,
and it is unlikely that federal funding
that is not currently available will be
available for the program. FRA does not
anticipate that any small railroads
would be interested in taking over such
an existing, eligible Amtrak route.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Criteria for Substantial Number
This proposed regulation is voluntary
for all rail carriers, except Amtrak,
which would be impacted only if
another carrier petitions to participate
in the pilot program. Therefore, there
are no mandates placed on large or
small railroads. Consequently, this
proposed regulation would not affect a
substantial number of small entities,
and most likely will not impact any
small entities.
Criteria for ‘‘Significant Economic
Impacts’’
The factual basis for the certification
that this proposed rule, if promulgated,
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities is that the proposed pilot
program is voluntary for all rail carriers
except Amtrak; and no small entities are
anticipated to apply. Therefore, this
proposed regulation would have no
economic impact on small entities.
FRA notes that this proposed
regulation does not disproportionately
place any small railroads that are small
entities at a significant competitive
disadvantage. Small railroads are not
excluded from participation, so long as
they are eligible. This proposed
regulation and the underlying statute
are aimed at railroads taking over an
entire route. If Amtrak uses 30 miles of
a small railroad’s infrastructure in a
route that is 750 miles long, the small
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Sep 06, 2011
Jkt 223001
railroad could not apply to take over
just its own segment, but would have to
apply to take over the whole route.
Thus, the ability to bid on a route is not
constrained by a railroad’s size.
Request for Comments
FRA invites comments from all
interested parties on this certification.
FRA also requests comments on the
threshold economic analysis and its
underlying assumptions. FRA
particularly encourages small entities
that could potentially be impacted by
the proposed amendments to participate
in the public comment process by
submitting comments on this
assessment or this rulemaking to the
official U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT) docket.
Certification
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), FRA certifies that
this proposed rule would not have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The proposed
rule does not require, or otherwise
impose, any requirements upon any
small entities. Instead, this proposal
develops a pilot program under which
an eligible small entity may voluntarily
elect to participate. Furthermore, the
proposed rule would establish a very
limited pilot program that would apply
to no more than two Amtrak routes.
FRA invites all interested parties to
submit data and information regarding
the potential economic impact that
would result from adoption of the
proposals in this NPRM. FRA will
consider all comments received in the
public comment process when making a
final determination for certification of
the final rule.
3. Paperwork Reduction Act
According to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 and OMB’s
Implementing Guidance at 5 CFR
1320.3(c), ‘‘collection of information
means, except as provided in section
1320.4, the obtaining, causing to be
obtained, soliciting, or requiring the
disclosure to an agency, third parties or
the public of information by or for an
agency by means of identical questions
posed to, or identical reporting,
recordkeeping, or disclosure
requirements imposed on, ten or more
persons, whether such collection of
information is mandatory, voluntary, or
required to obtain or retain a benefit.’’
FRA expects that the requirements of
this proposed rule will affect less than
10 railroads or ‘‘persons’’ as defined in
5 CFR 1320.(c)(4). Consequently, no
information collection submission is
necessary, and no approval is being
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
sought from the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) at this time.
4. Environmental Impact
FRA has evaluated this NPRM in
accordance with its ‘‘Procedures for
Considering Environmental Impacts’’
(FRA’s Procedures) (64 FR 28545, May
26, 1999) as required by the National
Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.), other environmental
statutes, Executive Orders, and related
regulatory requirements. FRA has
determined that this document is not a
major FRA action (requiring the
preparation of an environmental impact
statement or environmental assessment)
because the proposed rulemaking would
not result in a change in current
passenger service; instead, the program
would only potentially result in a
change in the operator of such service.
In accordance with section 4(c) and (e)
of FRA’s Procedures, the agency has
further concluded that no extraordinary
circumstances exist with respect to this
NPRM that might trigger the need for a
more detailed environmental review. As
a result, FRA finds that this NPRM is
not a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human
environment.
5. Federalism Implications
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
(64 FR 43255, Aug. 4, 1999), requires
FRA to develop an accountable process
to ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input
by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that
have federalism implications.’’ ‘‘Policies
that have federalism implications’’ are
defined in the Executive Order to
include regulations that have
‘‘substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.’’ Under Executive
Order 13132, the agency may not issue
a regulation with federalism
implications that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs and that is not
required by statute, unless the Federal
government provides the funds
necessary to pay the direct compliance
costs incurred by State and local
governments, or the agency consults
with State and local government
officials early in the process of
developing the regulation. Where a
regulation has federalism implications
and preempts State law, the agency
seeks to consult with State and local
officials in the process of developing the
regulation.
FRA has analyzed this NPRM in
accordance with the principles and
E:\FR\FM\07SEP1.SGM
07SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 7, 2011 / Proposed Rules
criteria contained in Executive Order
13132. This NPRM complies with a
statutory mandate, and FRA believes it
is in compliance with Executive Order
13132.
This NPRM will not have a
substantial effect on the States, on the
relationship between the Federal
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. In addition, this
NPRM will not have any federalism
implications that impose substantial
direct compliance costs on State and
local governments.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
6. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Pursuant to Section 201 of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4, 2 U.S.C. 1531), each
Federal agency ‘‘shall, unless otherwise
prohibited by law, assess the effects of
Federal regulatory actions on State,
local, and tribal governments, and the
private sector (other than to the extent
that such regulations incorporate
requirements specifically set forth in
law).’’ Section 202 of the Act (2 U.S.C.
1532) further requires that ‘‘before
promulgating any general notice of
proposed rulemaking that is likely to
result in the promulgation of any rule
that includes any Federal mandate that
may result in expenditure by State,
local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100,000,000 or more (adjusted
annually for inflation) in any 1 year, and
before promulgating any final rule for
which a general notice of proposed
rulemaking was published, the agency
shall prepare a written statement’’
detailing the effect on State, local, and
tribal governments and the private
sector. This monetary amount of
$100,000,000 has been adjusted to
$140,800,000 to account for inflation.
This proposed rule would not result in
the expenditure of more than
$140,800,000 by the public sector in any
one year, and thus preparation of such
a statement is not required.
7. Energy Impact
Executive Order 13211 requires
Federal agencies to prepare a Statement
of Energy Effects for any ‘‘significant
energy action.’’ 66 FR 28355 (May 22,
2001). Under the Executive Order, a
‘‘significant energy action’’ is defined as
any action by an agency (normally
published in the Federal Register) that
promulgates or is expected to lead to the
promulgation of a final rule or
regulation, including notices of inquiry,
advance notices of proposed
rulemaking, and notices of proposed
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Sep 06, 2011
Jkt 223001
rulemaking that: (1)(i) Is a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866 or any successor order, and (ii) is
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy; or (2) is designated by the
Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs as a
significant energy action. FRA has
evaluated this NPRM in accordance
with Executive Order 13211. FRA has
determined that this NPRM will not
have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy.
Consequently, FRA has determined that
this regulatory action is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ within the
meaning of Executive Order 13211.
8. Privacy Act Information
Interested parties should be aware
that anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all written
communications and comments
received into any agency docket by the
name of the individual submitting the
document (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477), or you may visit https://
www.dot.gov/privacy.html.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 269
Railroads; Railroad employees.
The Proposed Rule
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, FRA proposes to amend
chapter II, subtitle B of title 49, Code of
Federal Regulations, as follows:
1. Add a new part 269 to read as
follows:
PART 269—ALTERNATE PASSENGER
RAIL SERVICE PILOT PROGRAM
Sec.
269.1
269.3
269.5
269.7
269.9
269.11
269.13
269.15
269.17
Purpose.
Application.
Definitions.
Petitions.
Bid Process.
Evaluation.
Award.
Access to facilities; employees.
Cessation of service.
Authority: Sec. 214, Div. B, Pub. L. No.
110–432; 49 U.S.C. 24711; and 49 CFR 1.49.
§ 269.1
Purpose.
The purpose of this part is to carry out
the statutory mandate set forth in 49
U.S.C. 24711 requiring FRA to develop
a pilot program that permits a railroad
that owns infrastructure over which
Amtrak operates a passenger rail service
route to petition FRA to be considered
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
55341
as a passenger rail service provider over
that route in lieu of Amtrak.
§ 269.3
Application.
(a) Certification. This part will not be
applicable to any railroad, unless and
until, the Secretary certifies that FRA
has sufficient resources that are
adequate to undertake the pilot program
developed by this part. FRA will
provide notice of the certification on the
FRA public Web site upon receipt.
(b) Route Limitations. The pilot
program developed by this part will not
be made available to more than two
Amtrak intercity passenger rail routes.
(c) Time Limitations. Any railroad
awarded a contract to provide passenger
rail service under the pilot program
developed by this part shall only
provide such service for a period not to
exceed either five years after October 16,
2008, or a later date authorized by
statute.
§ 269.5
Definitions.
As used in this part—
Act means the Passenger Rail
Investment and Improvement Act of
2008 (Pub. L. 110–432, Division B (Oct.
16, 2008)).
Administrator means the Federal
Railroad Administrator, or the Federal
Railroad Administrator’s delegate.
Amtrak means the National Railroad
Passenger Corporation.
File and Filed mean submission of a
document under this part on the date
the document was postmarked, or the
date the document was e-mailed to FRA.
Financial plan means a plan that
contains, for each Federal fiscal year
fully or partially covered by the bid: an
annual projection of the revenues,
expenses, capital expenditure
requirements, and cash flows (from
operating activities, investing activities,
and financing activities, showing
sources and uses of funds) attributable
to the route; and a statement of the
assumptions underlying the financial
plan’s contents.
FRA means the Federal Railroad
Administration.
Operating plan means a plan that
contains, for each Federal fiscal year
fully or partially covered by the bid: a
complete description of the service
planned to be offered, including the
train schedules, frequencies, equipment
consists, fare structures, and such
amenities as sleeping cars and food
service provisions; station locations;
hours of operation; provisions for
accommodating the traveling public,
including proposed arrangements for
stations shared with other routes;
expected ridership; passenger-miles;
revenues by class of service between
E:\FR\FM\07SEP1.SGM
07SEP1
55342
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 7, 2011 / Proposed Rules
each city-pair proposed to be served;
and a statement of the assumptions
underlying the operating plan’s
contents.
Passenger rail service route means
those routes described in 49 U.S.C.
24102(5)(B), (C), and (D) or in 49 U.S.C.
24702.
Petitioner means a railroad, other than
Amtrak, that has submitted a petition to
FRA under section 269.7 of this part.
Railroad means a rail carrier or rail
carriers, as defined in 49 U.S.C.
10102(5).
Secretary means the Secretary of the
U.S. Department of Transportation.
§ 269.7
Petitions.
(a) In General. A railroad that owns
infrastructure over which Amtrak
operates a passenger rail service route
may petition FRA to be considered as a
passenger rail service provider over that
route in lieu of Amtrak for a period of
time consistent with the time
limitations described in § 269.3(c).
(b) Petition Requirements. Each
petition shall:
(1) Be filed with FRA no later than 45
days after FRA provides notice of the
Secretary’s certification pursuant to
§ 269.3(a) using the following method:
e-mail to Priia214@dot.gov.;
(2) Describe the petition as a ‘‘Petition
to Provide Passenger Rail Service under
49 CFR part 269’’; and
(3) Describe the route or routes over
which the petitioner wants to provide
passenger rail service and the Amtrak
service that the petitioner wants to
replace.
(c) Future Petitions. In the event that
a statute extends the time period under
which a railroad may provide passenger
rail service pursuant to the pilot
program developed by this part,
petitions under this section shall be
filed with FRA no later than 60 days
after the later of the enactment of such
statutory authority or the Secretary’s
issuance of the certification under
§ 269.3(a), and shall otherwise comply
with the requirements of this part.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 269.9
Bid Process.
(a) Amtrak Notification. FRA will
notify Amtrak of any eligible petition
filed with FRA no later than 30 days
after FRA’s receipt of such petition.
(b) Bid Requirements. A petitioner
and Amtrak must both file a bid with
FRA to provide passenger rail service
over the route to which the petition
relates no later than 60 days after the
petition deadline established by § 269.7
using the following method: e-mail to
Priia214@dot.gov. Each such bid must:
(1) Provide FRA with sufficient
information to evaluate the level of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Sep 06, 2011
Jkt 223001
service described in the proposal, and to
evaluate the proposal’s compliance with
the requirements described in
§ 269.13(b);
(2) Describe how the bidder would
operate the route. This description must
include, but is not limited to, an
operating plan, a financial plan and, if
applicable, any agreement(s) necessary
for the operation of passenger service
over right-of-way on the route that is not
owned by the railroad. In addition, if
the bidder intends to generate any
revenues from ancillary activities (i.e.,
activities other than passenger
transportation, accommodations, and
food service) as part of its proposed
operation of the route, then the bidder
must fully describe such ancillary
activities and identify their incremental
impact in all relevant sections of the
operating plan and the financial plan,
and on the route’s performance under
the financial and performance metrics
developed pursuant to § 207 of the Act,
together with the assumptions
underlying the estimates of such
incremental impacts;
(3) Describe what Amtrak passenger
equipment would be needed, if any;
(4) Describe in detail, including
amounts, timing, and intended purpose,
what sources of Federal and nonFederal funding the bidder would use,
including but not limited to any Federal
or State operating subsidy and any other
Federal or State payments;
(5) Contain a staffing plan describing
the number of employees needed to
operate the service, the job assignments
and requirements, and the terms of work
for prospective and current employees
of the bidder for the service outlined in
the bid; and
(6) Describe how the passenger rail
service would comply with the financial
and performance metrics developed
pursuant to § 207 of the Act. At a
minimum, this description must
include, for each Federal fiscal year
fully or partially covered by the bid: a
projection of the route’s expected ontime performance and train delays
according to the metrics developed
pursuant to § 207 of the Act; and the net
cash used in operating activities per
passenger-mile attributable to the route.
(c) Supplemental Information. FRA
may request supplemental information
from a petitioner and/or Amtrak where
FRA determines such information is
needed to evaluate a bid. In such a
request, FRA will establish a deadline
by which the supplemental information
must be filed with FRA.
§ 269.11
Evaluation.
FRA will select a winning bidder by
evaluating the bids against the financial
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
and performance metrics developed
under § 207 of the Act and the
requirements of this part, and will give
preference in awarding contracts to
bidders seeking to operate routes that
have been identified as one of the five
worst performing Amtrak routes under
49 U.S.C. 24710.
§ 269.13
Award.
(a) Award. FRA will execute a
contract with the winning bidder(s),
consistent with the requirements of this
section and as FRA may otherwise
require, no later than 90 days after the
bid deadline established by § 269.9(b).
FRA will provide timely notice of these
selections to all petitioners and Amtrak.
(b) Contract Requirements. Among
other things, the contract between FRA
and a winning bidder shall:
(1) Award to the winning bidder the
right and obligation to provide
passenger rail service over that route
subject to such performance standards
as FRA may require, consistent with the
standards developed under § 207 of the
Act, for a duration consistent with
§ 269.3(c);
(2) Award to the winning bidder an
operating subsidy for the first year at a
level not in excess of the level in effect
during the fiscal year preceding the
fiscal year in which the petition was
received, adjusted for inflation, and for
any subsequent years at such level,
adjusted for inflation;
(3) Condition the operating and
subsidy rights upon the winning bidder
continuing to provide passenger rail
service on the route that is no less
frequent, nor over a shorter distance,
than Amtrak provided on that route
before the award;
(4) Condition the operating and
subsidy rights upon the winning
bidder’s compliance with the minimum
standards established under § 207 of the
Act and such additional performance
standards as FRA may establish; and
(5) Subject the winning bidder to the
grant conditions established by 49
U.S.C. 24405.
(c) Staffing Plan Publication. The
winning bidder shall make their staffing
plan required by § 269.9(b)(4) available
to the public after the bid award.
§ 269.15
Access to facilities; employees.
(a) Access to Facilities. If the award
under § 269.13 is made to a railroad
other than Amtrak, Amtrak must
provide access to its reservation system,
stations, and facilities directly related to
operations to the winning bidder
awarded a contract under this part, in
accordance with § 217 of the Act,
necessary to carry out the purposes of
this part.
E:\FR\FM\07SEP1.SGM
07SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 7, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(b) Employees. The employees of any
person used by a railroad in the
operation of a route under this part shall
be considered an employee of that
railroad and subject to the applicable
Federal laws and regulations governing
similar crafts or classes of employees of
Amtrak, including provisions under
§ 121 of the Amtrak Reform and
Accountability Act of 1997 relating to
employees who provide food and
beverage service.
(c) Hiring Preference. The winning
bidder shall provide hiring preference to
qualified Amtrak employees displaced
by the award of the bid, consistent with
the staffing plan submitted by the
winning bidder.
§ 269.17
Cessation of service.
If a railroad awarded a route under
this part ceases to operate the service or
fails to fulfill its obligations under the
contract required under § 269.13, the
Administrator, in collaboration with the
Surface Transportation Board, shall take
any necessary action consistent with
title 49 of the United States Code to
enforce the contract and ensure the
continued provision of service,
including the installment of an interim
service provider and re-bidding the
contract to operate the service. The
entity providing service shall either be
Amtrak or a railroad eligible for this
pilot program under § 269.7.
Issued in Washington DC on August 29,
2011.
Karen J. Rae,
Deputy Administrator, Federal Railroad
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–22699 Filed 9–6–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Parts 300 and 679
[Docket No. 101027534–0559–01]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
RIN 0648–BA37
Pacific Halibut Fisheries; Extension of
Public Comment Period on Proposed
Rule for a Catch Sharing Plan for
Guided Sport and Commercial
Fisheries in Alaska
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule, extension of
public comment period.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Sep 06, 2011
Jkt 223001
NMFS is extending the date
by which public comments are due
concerning proposed regulations to
implement a catch sharing plan for the
guided sport and commercial fisheries
for Pacific halibut in waters of
International Pacific Halibut
Commission (IPHC) Regulatory Areas 2C
(Southeast Alaska) and 3A (Central Gulf
of Alaska). NMFS published the
proposed rule on July 22, 2011 and
announced that the public comment
period would end on September 6,
2011. With this notice, NMFS is
extending the comment period to
September 21, 2011.
DATES: The deadline for receipt of
comments on the proposed rule
published on July 22, 2011 (76 FR
44156), is extended from September 6,
2011, to September 21, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Glenn
Merrill, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Alaska Region, NMFS, Attn:
Ellen Sebastian. You may submit
comments identified by 0648–BA37 by
any one of the following methods:
• Electronic submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal Web site at
https://www.regulations.gov.
• Mail: P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK
99802–1668.
• Fax: 907–586–7557.
• Hand delivery: 709 West 9th Street,
Room 420A, Juneau, AK.
All comments received are a part of
the public record and will generally be
posted to https://www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit confidential business
information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter
N/A in the required fields if you wish
to remain anonymous). Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe portable document file (pdf)
formats only.
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection-of-information
requirements contained in this proposed
rule may be submitted to NMFS at the
above address and by e-mail to
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov or fax
to 202–395–7285.
Electronic copies of the proposed rule
and the Environmental Assessment/
Regulatory Impact Review/Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis prepared
for this action are available from
https://www.regulations.gov or from the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
55343
NMFS Alaska Region Web site at https://
alaskafisheries.noaa.gov. The
Environmental Assessment/Regulatory
Impact Review/Final Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis for the charter
halibut limited access program is
available from the NMFS Alaska Region
Web site at https://
alaskafisheries.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rachel Baker, 907–586–7228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 22, 2011, NMFS published
regulations at 76 FR 44156, that would
implement a catch sharing plan for the
guided sport and commercial fisheries
for Pacific halibut in waters of IPHC
Regulatory Areas 2C (Southeast Alaska)
and 3A (Central Gulf of Alaska). The
proposed catch sharing plan will change
the annual process of allocating halibut
between the guided sport and
commercial fisheries in Area 2C and
Area 3A, establish allocations for each
sector, and specify harvest restrictions
for guided sport anglers that are
intended to limit harvest to the annual
guided sport fishery catch limit. The
proposed catch sharing plan also will
authorize annual transfers of
commercial halibut quota to charter
halibut permit holders for harvest in the
guided sport fishery.
NMFS received several requests from
members of the public and
representatives of recreational fishing
organizations to extend the comment
period on the proposed rule due to
overlap with the recreational halibut
fishing season and the complexity of the
proposed catch sharing plan. Several
commenters requested a 30-day
extension and one commenter asked for
an additional 60 days. We have
considered these comments and
conclude that a 15-day extension should
allow sufficient time for the public to
review and comment on the proposed
rule without significantly delaying the
rulemaking process.
Dated: September 1, 2011.
John Oliver,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Operations, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–22862 Filed 9–1–11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\07SEP1.SGM
07SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 173 (Wednesday, September 7, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 55335-55343]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-22699]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
49 CFR Part 269
[Docket No. FRA-2009-0108; Notice No. 1]
RIN 2130-AC19
Alternate Passenger Rail Service Pilot Program
AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This NPRM is in response to a statutory mandate that FRA
complete a rulemaking proceeding to develop a pilot program that
permits a rail carrier or rail carriers that own infrastructure over
which Amtrak operates certain passenger rail service routes to petition
FRA to be considered as a passenger rail service provider over such a
route in lieu of Amtrak for a period not to exceed five years after the
date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act
of 2008. The proposed rule would develop this pilot program in
conformance with the statutory directive.
DATES: Written Comments: Written comments on the proposed rule must be
received by November 7, 2011. Comments received after that date will be
considered to the extent possible without incurring additional expense
or delay. FRA anticipates being able to determine these matters without
a public hearing. However, if prior to October 7, 2011, FRA receives a
specific request for a public hearing accompanied by a showing that the
party is unable to adequately present his or her position by written
statement, a hearing will be scheduled and FRA will publish a
supplemental notice in the Federal Register to inform interested
parties of the date, time, and location of any such hearing.
ADDRESSES: Comments: Comments related to Docket Number FRA-2009-0108,
may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
Hand Delivery: Room W12-140 on the Ground level of the
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., Washington, DC between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m. Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
[[Page 55336]]
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory Identification Number (RIN) for this
rulemaking. Note that all comments received will be posted without
change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information. Please see the Privacy Act heading later in this document
for more Privacy Act information.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov at any time, or to
room W12-140 on the Ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey
Ave., SE., Washington, DC between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through
Friday, except Federal Holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexander Roth, Office of Railroad
Policy and Development, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., Washington, DC
20590 (Telephone 202-493-6109), or Zeb Schorr, Attorney-Advisor, Office
of Chief Counsel, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., Mail Stop 10,
Washington, DC 20590 (Telephone 202-493-6072).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Statutory Background
The proposed rule is in response to a statutory mandate--
specifically, Sec. 214 of the Passenger Rail Investment and
Improvement Act of 2008 (PRIIA), Public Law No. 110-432, Division B
(Oct. 16, 2008)--that FRA complete a rulemaking proceeding to develop a
pilot program that permits a rail carrier or rail carriers that own
infrastructure over which Amtrak operates certain passenger rail
service routes to petition FRA to be considered as a passenger rail
service provider over such a route in lieu of Amtrak for a period not
to exceed five years after the date of enactment of PRIIA. Section 214
further provides that those routes described in 49 U.S.C. 24102(5)(B),
(C), and (D) and in 49 U.S.C. 24702 are eligible for the pilot program,
and that the program not be made available to more than two routes.
Section 214 also provides for, among other things, the following:
The establishment of a petition, notification, and bid process through
which FRA would evaluate bids to provide passenger rail service over
particular routes by interested rail carriers and Amtrak; FRA's
selection of a winning bidder by, among other things, evaluating the
bids against the financial and performance metrics developed under
section 207 of PRIIA; FRA's execution of a contract with the winning
bidder awarding the right and obligation to provide passenger rail
service over the route, along with an operating subsidy, as well as
requiring compliance with the minimum standards established under
section 207 of PRIIA, among other things; that Amtrak must provide
access to its reservation system, stations, and facilities to a winning
bidder; that employees used in the operation of a route under the pilot
program would be considered an employee of that rail carrier and would
be subject to the applicable Federal laws and regulations governing
similar crafts or classes of employees of Amtrak; that the winning
bidder must provide hiring preference to displaced qualified Amtrak
employees; that the winning bidder would be subject to the grant
conditions under 49 U.S.C. 24405; and that, if a winning bidder ceases
to operate the service or to otherwise fulfill their obligations, the
FRA Administrator, in collaboration with the Surface Transportation
Board, would take any necessary action to enforce the contract and to
ensure the continued provision of service.
B. Adequate Resources Certification
Section 214 provides that, before FRA may take any action allowed
under 49 U.S.C. 24711, the Secretary of Transportation (Secretary) must
certify that the FRA Administrator has sufficient resources that are
adequate to undertake the pilot program. FRA understands this
requirement to mean that FRA may not proceed with any action under a
pilot program developed by this proposed rulemaking until the Secretary
has issued such a certification.
It should also be noted that section 214 requires FRA to award to a
winning bidder, among other things, an operating subsidy. 49 U.S.C.
24711(a)(5)(B). PRIIA did not authorize funds for FRA to use to pay for
any such operating subsidy, or any other costs arising from the
proposed pilot program; nor did Congress appropriate funds for the
pilot program.
This proposed rulemaking would incorporate the adequate resources
certification requirement by providing, in Sec. 269.3(a), that the
part would not be applicable to any railroad, unless and until the
Secretary certifies that FRA has sufficient resources that are adequate
to undertake the pilot program. Only upon such certification would the
proposed pilot program become available. As described below, the time
period within which petitions may be filed with FRA would be triggered
by FRA providing notice of the Secretary's certification.
C. Timeline Established by the Proposed Rule
The proposed rule would establish deadlines for filing petitions,
filing bids, and FRA's execution of contract(s) with any winning
bidders. As to the filing of petitions, Sec. 269.7(b) of the proposed
rule would require a petition to be filed with FRA no later than 45
days after FRA provides notice of the Secretary's certification that
the FRA Administrator has sufficient resources that are adequate to
undertake the pilot program. This deadline is necessary in order to
comply with the statutory mandate. Specifically, 49 U.S.C. 24711(a)(4)
requires FRA to, as relevant here, ``give preference in awarding
contracts to bidders seeking to operate routes that have been
identified as one of the five worst performing Amtrak routes under
section 24710'' of title 49 of the United States Code. In order to
comply with this statutory directive to ``give preference'' to ``the
five worst performing Amtrak routes,'' FRA must be able to evaluate all
bids at the same time. Section 269.7(b)'s proposed petition deadline
would enable FRA to evaluate all bids at the same time and to ``give
preference'' where appropriate as directed by the statute.
In addition, Sec. Sec. 269.3(c) and 269.7(d) of the proposal would
also take into consideration the possibility that the period during
which a railroad may provide passenger rail service under this proposed
pilot program, which is currently set by statute to expire on October
16, 2013, is extended by statute. In that event, the proposed rule
would require petitions to be filed with FRA no later than 60 days
after the enactment of such statutory authority and would require such
petitions to otherwise comply with the requirements of this part.
As to the filing of bids, proposed Sec. 269.9 would require the
Petitioner and Amtrak to both file bids with FRA no later than 60 days
after the petition deadline established by proposed Sec. 269.7(b).
Proposed Sec. 269.9(b) articulates the bid requirements. The 60-day
time period would give a bidder sufficient time to prepare a bid that
satisfies the bid requirements, while also limiting the duration of the
bid process.
Lastly, as to the award and execution of contracts with winning
bidders, proposed Sec. 269.13 would require FRA to execute a contract
with the winning bidder(s) no later than 90 days after the bid deadline
established by proposed Sec. 269.9. Section 214 of PRIIA requires
[[Page 55337]]
FRA to ``execute a contract within a specified, limited time.'' 49
U.S.C. 24711(a)(5). The 90-day time period is a limited period for FRA
and the winning bidder(s) to execute an agreement(s) that satisfies the
proposed requirements of Sec. 269.13, including FRA's obligation of an
operating subsidy in compliance with the statutory requirements.
II. Section-by-Section Analysis
Section 269.1 Purpose
This section provides that the proposed rule would carry out the
statutory mandate set forth in 49 U.S.C. 24711 that requires FRA to
develop a pilot program that permits a rail carrier or rail carriers
that own infrastructure over which Amtrak operates a passenger rail
service route to petition FRA to be considered as a passenger rail
service provider over that route in lieu of Amtrak.
Section 269.3 Application
Paragraph (a) of this section provides that the proposed rule would
not apply to any railroad, unless and until the Secretary certifies
that FRA has sufficient resources that are adequate to undertake the
pilot program. This section also states that, upon receipt, FRA will
provide notice of the certification on the FRA public Web site. This
proposed paragraph is based on the statutory directive in 49 U.S.C.
24711(e). In addition, as discussed in Sec. 269.7(a) of the proposal,
FRA's notice of the Secretary's certification will trigger the 45-day
deadline by which an eligible railroad may petition FRA under the pilot
program.
Paragraph (b) of this section provides that the proposed pilot
program would not be made available to more than two Amtrak intercity
passenger rail routes. This proposed paragraph is based on the
statutory directive contained in 49 U.S.C. 24711(b).
Paragraph (c) of this section proposes that any rail carrier or
rail carriers awarded a contract to provide passenger rail service
under the pilot program would only be able to provide such service for
a period not to exceed five years after October 16, 2008 (the date of
PRIIA's enactment), or a later date authorized by statute. This
proposed paragraph is based on the statutory directive contained in 49
U.S.C. 24711(a)(1). In addition, this proposed section also takes into
consideration the possibility that the 5-year limitation period
established in PRIIA is extended by statute.
Section 269.5 Definitions
This section contains the definitions that FRA proposes to employ
in this rule. This section proposes definitions the following terms:
Act; Administrator; Amtrak; File and filed; Financial plan; FRA;
Operating plan; Passenger rail service route; Petitioner; Railroad, and
Secretary. Among other definitions, this section proposes to define
``passenger rail service route'' to mean those routes described in 49
U.S.C. 24102(5)(B), (C), and (D) and in 49 U.S.C. 24702. This
definition is based on the statutory directive contained in 49 U.S.C.
24711(a)(1). In addition, this section proposes to define ``railroad''
to mean a rail carrier or rail carriers, as defined in 49 U.S.C.
10102(5). This definition is based on the statutory directive contained
in 49 U.S.C. 24711(a)(1) and (c)(3).
This section also proposes to define ``financial plan'' to mean a
plan that contains, for each Federal fiscal year fully or partially
covered by the bid: An annual projection of the revenues, expenses,
capital expenditure requirements, and cash flows (from operating
activities, investing activities, and financing activities, showing
sources and uses of funds) attributable to the route; and a statement
of the assumptions underlying the financial plan's contents. In
addition, this proposed section defines ``operating plan'' to mean a
plan that contains, for each Federal fiscal year fully or partially
covered by the bid: A complete description of the service planned to be
offered, including the train schedules, frequencies, equipment
consists, fare structures, and such amenities as sleeping cars and food
service provisions; station locations; hours of operation; provisions
for accommodating the traveling public, including proposed arrangements
for stations shared with other routes; expected ridership; passenger-
miles; revenues by class of service between each city-pair proposed to
be served; and a statement of the assumptions underlying the operating
plan's contents. The proposed rule would require bidders to include a
financial plan and an operating plan--as those terms are defined here--
in their bids. These proposed definitions would ensure that bids
contain sufficient information to be evaluated.
Section 269.7 Petitions
Paragraph (a) of this section proposes that a railroad that owns
infrastructure over which Amtrak operates a passenger rail service
route may petition FRA to be considered as a passenger rail service
provider over that route in lieu of Amtrak for a period of time
consistent with the time limitations described in section 269.3(c).
This proposed paragraph is based on the statutory directive contained
in 49 U.S.C. 24711(a)(1). This paragraph would not require a railroad
own all of the infrastructure over which Amtrak operates a passenger
rail service route in order to file a petition.
Paragraph (b) of this section proposes that a petition submitted to
FRA under this rule must: Be filed with FRA no later than 45 days after
FRA provides notice of the Secretary's certification pursuant to
proposed Sec. 269.3(a); describe the petition as a ``Petition to
Provide Passenger Rail Service under 49 CFR part 269''; and describe
the route or routes over which the petitioner wants to provide
passenger rail service and the Amtrak service that the petitioner wants
to replace. This proposed paragraph is intended to ensure that a
petition would provide clear notice to FRA.
Paragraph (c) of this section proposes that, in the event that a
later statute extends the time period under which a railroad may
provide passenger rail service pursuant to the pilot program, petitions
would have to be filed with FRA no later than 60 days after the later
of the enactment of such statutory authority or the Secretary's
issuance of the certification under Sec. 269.3(a), and that the
petition must otherwise comply with the requirements of the pilot
program. This proposed paragraph takes into consideration the
possibility that the 5-year limitations period established in PRIIA is
extended by statute.
Section 269.9 Bid Process
Paragraph (a) of this section proposes that FRA would notify Amtrak
of any eligible petition filed with FRA no later than 30 days after
FRA's receipt of such petition. This proposed paragraph is based on the
statutory directive contained in 49 U.S.C. 24711(a)(2).
Paragraph (b) of this section describes the proposed bid
requirements, including a requirement that such bids must be filed with
FRA no later than 60 days after the petition deadline established by
proposed Sec. 269.7. Paragraph (b) further proposes that such bids
must: (1) Provide FRA with sufficient information to evaluate the level
of service described in the proposal, and to evaluate the proposal's
compliance with the requirements described in proposed Sec. 269.13(b);
(2) describe how the bidder would operate the route (including an
operating plan, a financial plan and, if applicable, any agreement(s)
necessary for the operation of passenger service over right-of-way on
the route that is not owned by the railroad), and, if the bidder
intends to generate any revenues from ancillary activities (i.e.,
activities other than
[[Page 55338]]
passenger transportation, accommodations, and food service) as part of
its proposed operation of the route, then the bidder must fully
describe such ancillary activities and identify their incremental
impact in all relevant sections of the operating plan and the financial
plan, and on the route's performance under the financial and
performance metrics developed pursuant to section 207 of the Act,
together with the assumptions underlying the estimates of such
incremental impacts; (3) describe what Amtrak passenger equipment would
be needed, if any; (4) describe in detail, including amounts, timing,
and intended purpose, what sources of Federal and non-Federal funding
the bidder would use, including but not limited to any Federal or State
operating subsidy and any other Federal or State payments; (5) contain
a staffing plan describing the number of employees needed to operate
the service, the job assignments and requirements, and the terms of
work for prospective and current employees of the bidder for the
service outlined in the bid; and (6) describe how the passenger rail
service would comply with the financial and performance metrics
developed pursuant to section 207 of the Act (at a minimum, this
description must include, for each Federal fiscal year fully or
partially covered by the bid: a projection of the route's expected on-
time performance and train delays according to the metrics developed
pursuant to section 207 of the Act; and the net cash used in operating
activities per passenger-mile attributable to the route). This proposed
paragraph is based on the statutory directive contained in 49 U.S.C.
24711(a)(3) and (a)(6).
Paragraph (c) of this section proposes that FRA could request
supplemental information from a petitioner and/or Amtrak where FRA
determines such information is needed to evaluate a bid. In such a
request, FRA would establish a deadline by which the supplemental
information must be submitted to FRA. This proposed paragraph allows
FRA to request additional information where the information provided in
a bid prevents FRA from adequately evaluating the proposal.
Section 269.11 Evaluation
This section proposes that FRA would select a winning bidder by
evaluating the bids against the financial and performance metrics
developed under section 207 of PRIIA and the requirements of this
proposed part, and would give preference in awarding contracts to
bidders seeking to operate routes that have been identified as one of
the five worst performing Amtrak routes under 49 U.S.C. 24710. This
proposed paragraph is based on the statutory directive contained in 49
U.S.C. 24711(a)(4).
Section 269.13 Award
Paragraph (a) of this section proposes that FRA would execute a
contract with the winning bidder(s) consistent with the requirements of
proposed Sec. 269.13 and as FRA may otherwise require, no later than
90 days after the bid deadline established by proposed Sec. 269.9(b).
This paragraph also provides that FRA would provide timely notice of
these selections to all petitioners and to Amtrak. This proposed
paragraph is based on the statutory directive contained in 49 U.S.C.
24711(a)(5).
Paragraph (b) of this section proposes that, among other things,
such a contract would: (1) Award to the winning bidder the right and
obligation to provide passenger rail service over that route subject to
such performance standards as FRA may require, consistent with the
standards developed under section 207 of PRIIA; (2) award to the
winning bidder an operating subsidy for the first year at a level not
in excess of the level in effect during the fiscal year preceding the
fiscal year in which the petition was received, adjusted for inflation,
and for any subsequent years at such level, adjusted for inflation; (3)
condition the operating and subsidy rights upon the winning bidder
continuing to provide passenger rail service on the route that is no
less frequent, nor over a shorter distance, than Amtrak provided on
that route before the award; (4) condition the operating and subsidy
rights upon the winning bidder's compliance with the minimum standards
established under section 207 of PRIIA and such additional performance
standards as FRA may establish; and (5) subject the winning bidder to
the grant conditions established by 49 U.S.C. 24405. This proposed
paragraph is based on the statutory directive contained in 49 U.S.C.
24711(a)(5), (c)(1), and (c)(4).
Paragraph (c) of this section proposes that the winning bidder
would make their staffing plan, submitted as required by proposed Sec.
269.9(b)(4), available to the public after the bid award. This proposed
paragraph is based on the statutory directive contained in 49 U.S.C.
24711(a)(6).
Section 269.15 Access to Facilities; Employees
Paragraph (a) of this section proposes that, if an award under
proposed Sec. 269.13 is made to a rail carrier other than Amtrak,
Amtrak must provide access to its reservation system, stations, and
facilities directly related to operations to the winning bidder awarded
a contract, in accordance with section 217 of PRIIA, necessary to carry
out the purposes of the proposed rule. This proposed paragraph is based
on the statutory directive contained in 49 U.S.C. 24711(c)(2).
Paragraph (b) of this section proposes that the employees of any
person used by a rail carrier in the operation of a route under the
proposed rule would be considered an employee of that carrier and
subject to the applicable Federal laws and regulations governing
similar crafts or classes of employees of Amtrak, including provisions
under Sec. 121 of the Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act of 1997
relating to employees that provide food and beverage service. This
proposed paragraph is based on the statutory directive contained in 49
U.S.C. 24711(c)(3).
Paragraph (c) of this section proposes that a winning bidder would
provide hiring preference to qualified Amtrak employees displaced by
the award of the bid, consistent with the staffing plan submitted by
the winning bidder. This proposed paragraph is based on the statutory
directive contained in 49 U.S.C. 24711(c)(4).
Section 269.17 Cessation of Service
This section proposes that, if a rail carrier awarded a route under
this rule ceases to operate the service or fails to fulfill its
obligations under the contract required under proposed Sec. 269.13,
the Administrator, in collaboration with the Surface Transportation
Board, will take any necessary action consistent with title 49 of the
United States Code to enforce the contract and ensure the continued
provision of service, including the installment of an interim service
provider and re-bidding the contract to operate the service. This
section further proposes that the entity providing service would either
be Amtrak or a rail carrier eligible for the pilot program under
proposed Sec. 269.7. This proposed paragraph is based on the statutory
directive contained in 49 U.S.C. 24711(d).
III. Regulatory Impact and Notices
1. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 and DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures
This proposed rule has been evaluated in accordance with existing
policies and procedures and determined to be non-significant under
Executive Order 12866, Executive Order 13563, and DOT policies and
procedures. See 44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979. FRA
[[Page 55339]]
has prepared and placed in the docket a regulatory impact analysis
(RIA) addressing the economic impact of this proposed rule. Document
inspection and copying facilities are available at the DOT Central
Docket Management Facility located in Room W12-140 on the Ground level
of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590. Docket material is also available for inspection electronically
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
Photocopies may also be obtained by submitting a written request to the
FRA Docket Clerk at the Office of Chief Counsel, RCC-10, Mail Stop 10,
Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590; please refer to Docket No. FRA-2009-0108.
As part of the regulatory impact analysis, FRA has generally
assessed quantitative measurements of the cost and benefit streams
expected to result from the adoption of a proposed rule. However, in
this case, due to the limited number of routes that would be awarded
under the pilot program (only two routes could be awarded), and the
short timeframe in which this pilot program would operate (until 2013),
it is not feasible to perform an analysis for an extended period.
There are no alternate service provider railroad regulatory costs
because the program is voluntary with respect to such rail carriers.
Regulatory costs would be triggered for Amtrak should one or more
alternative service providers bid on routes. For informational
purposes, FRA has included in Appendices of the RIA the estimated
average costs for both a railroad and Amtrak to participate in the
pilot program. FRA estimates the average cost for each individual
railroad to participate in the program and to submit the required bid
proposal (the majority of the cost) at about $300,000 per route, and
the average cost for Amtrak at about $150,000 per route (regardless of
how many individual railroads bid on the individual Amtrak route).
Railroads that participate voluntarily would do so because they
consider the benefits to exceed the costs. Thus, any participation
would be cost beneficial with respect to the voluntary participant. Any
potential costs to Amtrak are regulatory costs that would not be
incurred in absence of this proposed rule or the costs associated with
developing bids for up to two routes.
Given that this pilot program is voluntary for potential alternate
service providers and is not currently funded by Congress, FRA
estimates that this proposed regulation would not result in any
benefits or costs.
2. Regulatory Flexibility Act
To ensure potential impacts of rules on small entities are properly
considered, FRA developed this proposed rule in accordance with
Executive Order 13272 (``Proper Consideration of Small Entities in
Agency Rulemaking'') and DOT's procedures and policies to promote
compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires an agency to review regulations
to assess their impact on small entities. An agency must conduct a
regulatory flexibility analysis unless it determines and certifies that
a rule is not expected to have a significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Purpose
As noted earlier in this NPRM, the purpose of this proposed
rulemaking is to respond to a statutory mandate to develop a pilot
program that permits a rail carrier or rail carriers that own
infrastructure over which Amtrak operates certain passenger rail
service routes to petition FRA to be considered as a passenger rail
service provider over such a route in lieu of Amtrak for a period not
to exceed five years after the date of enactment of PRIIA. The proposed
rule would develop this pilot program in conformance with the statutory
directive.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
requires a review of proposed and final rules to assess their impact on
small entities, unless the Secretary certifies that the rule would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Pursuant to Sec. 312 of the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), FRA has issued a
final policy that formally establishes ``small entities'' as including
railroads that meet the line-haulage revenue requirements of a Class
III railroad. 49 CFR part 209, App. C. For other entities, the same
dollar limit in revenues governs whether a railroad, contractor, or
other respondent is a small entity. Id. Additionally, section 601(5)
defines as ``small entities'' governments of cities, counties, towns,
townships, villages, school districts, or special districts with
populations less than 50,000. Such governments would not be directly
impacted by this proposal.
Rationale for Choosing Regulatory Action and Legal Authority
FRA is initiating this NPRM in response to a statutory mandate set
forth in section 214 of PRIIA. Section 214 requires FRA to complete a
rulemaking proceeding to develop a pilot program that permits a rail
carrier or rail carriers that own infrastructure over which Amtrak
operates certain passenger rail service routes to petition FRA to be
considered as a passenger rail service provider over such a route in
lieu of Amtrak for a period not to exceed five years after the date of
enactment of PRIIA. This proposed rule develops this pilot program in
conformance with the statutory directive.
Description of Regulated Entities and Impacts
This proposed rule would be applicable to railroads that own
infrastructure upon which Amtrak operates those routes described in 49
U.S.C. 24102(5)(B), (C), and (D) and in 49 U.S.C. 24702, which may
include small railroads. ``Small entity'' is defined in 5 U.S.C. 601 as
including a small business concern that is independently owned and
operated, and is not dominant in its field of operation. The U.S. Small
Business Administration (SBA) has authority to regulate issues related
to small businesses, and stipulates in its size standards that a
``small entity'' in the railroad industry is a for profit ``line-haul
railroad'' that has fewer than 1,500 employees, a ``short line
railroad'' with fewer than 500 employees, or a ``commuter rail system''
with annual receipts of less than seven million dollars. See ``Size
Eligibility Provisions and Standards,'' 13 CFR part 121 subpart A.
Federal agencies may adopt their own size standards for small
entities in consultation with SBA and in conjunction with public
comment. Pursuant to that authority FRA has published a final statement
of agency policy that formally establishes ``small entities'' or
``small businesses'' as being railroads, contractors and hazardous
materials shippers that meet the revenue requirements of a Class III
railroad as set forth in 49 CFR 1201.1-1, which is $20 million or less
in inflation-adjusted annual revenues, and commuter railroads or small
governmental jurisdictions that serve populations of 50,000 or less.
See 68 FR 24891 (May 9, 2003) (codified at Appendix C to 49 CFR part
209). The $20 million limit is based on the Surface Transportation
Board's revenue threshold for a Class III railroad carrier. Railroad
revenue is adjusted for inflation by applying a revenue deflator
[[Page 55340]]
formula in accordance with 49 CFR 1201.1-1. FRA is using this
definition for the proposed rule.
Minimum Requirements for Pilot Program Applications
Small railroads face the same requirements for entry in the pilot
program as other railroads. The railroad must own infrastructure upon
which Amtrak operates those routes described in 49 U.S.C. 24102(5)(B),
(C), and (D) and in 49 U.S.C. 24702.
Disclosure of Assumptions
The purpose of this economic analysis is to provide pertinent
information on the effects of the proposed regulation, part 269,
``Alternate Passenger Rail Service Pilot Program.'' FRA believes that
the proposed regulation will not have any effect on small railroads
since participation in the pilot program is voluntary, only two routes
are available for award, the program expires in 2013, and it is
unlikely that federal funding that is not currently available will be
available for the program. FRA does not anticipate that any small
railroads would be interested in taking over such an existing, eligible
Amtrak route.
Criteria for Substantial Number
This proposed regulation is voluntary for all rail carriers, except
Amtrak, which would be impacted only if another carrier petitions to
participate in the pilot program. Therefore, there are no mandates
placed on large or small railroads. Consequently, this proposed
regulation would not affect a substantial number of small entities, and
most likely will not impact any small entities.
Criteria for ``Significant Economic Impacts''
The factual basis for the certification that this proposed rule, if
promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities is that the proposed pilot program
is voluntary for all rail carriers except Amtrak; and no small entities
are anticipated to apply. Therefore, this proposed regulation would
have no economic impact on small entities.
FRA notes that this proposed regulation does not disproportionately
place any small railroads that are small entities at a significant
competitive disadvantage. Small railroads are not excluded from
participation, so long as they are eligible. This proposed regulation
and the underlying statute are aimed at railroads taking over an entire
route. If Amtrak uses 30 miles of a small railroad's infrastructure in
a route that is 750 miles long, the small railroad could not apply to
take over just its own segment, but would have to apply to take over
the whole route. Thus, the ability to bid on a route is not constrained
by a railroad's size.
Request for Comments
FRA invites comments from all interested parties on this
certification. FRA also requests comments on the threshold economic
analysis and its underlying assumptions. FRA particularly encourages
small entities that could potentially be impacted by the proposed
amendments to participate in the public comment process by submitting
comments on this assessment or this rulemaking to the official U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT) docket.
Certification
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), FRA
certifies that this proposed rule would not have a significant impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The proposed rule does not
require, or otherwise impose, any requirements upon any small entities.
Instead, this proposal develops a pilot program under which an eligible
small entity may voluntarily elect to participate. Furthermore, the
proposed rule would establish a very limited pilot program that would
apply to no more than two Amtrak routes. FRA invites all interested
parties to submit data and information regarding the potential economic
impact that would result from adoption of the proposals in this NPRM.
FRA will consider all comments received in the public comment process
when making a final determination for certification of the final rule.
3. Paperwork Reduction Act
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and OMB's
Implementing Guidance at 5 CFR 1320.3(c), ``collection of information
means, except as provided in section 1320.4, the obtaining, causing to
be obtained, soliciting, or requiring the disclosure to an agency,
third parties or the public of information by or for an agency by means
of identical questions posed to, or identical reporting, recordkeeping,
or disclosure requirements imposed on, ten or more persons, whether
such collection of information is mandatory, voluntary, or required to
obtain or retain a benefit.'' FRA expects that the requirements of this
proposed rule will affect less than 10 railroads or ``persons'' as
defined in 5 CFR 1320.(c)(4). Consequently, no information collection
submission is necessary, and no approval is being sought from the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) at this time.
4. Environmental Impact
FRA has evaluated this NPRM in accordance with its ``Procedures for
Considering Environmental Impacts'' (FRA's Procedures) (64 FR 28545,
May 26, 1999) as required by the National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), other environmental statutes, Executive Orders,
and related regulatory requirements. FRA has determined that this
document is not a major FRA action (requiring the preparation of an
environmental impact statement or environmental assessment) because the
proposed rulemaking would not result in a change in current passenger
service; instead, the program would only potentially result in a change
in the operator of such service. In accordance with section 4(c) and
(e) of FRA's Procedures, the agency has further concluded that no
extraordinary circumstances exist with respect to this NPRM that might
trigger the need for a more detailed environmental review. As a result,
FRA finds that this NPRM is not a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment.
5. Federalism Implications
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, Aug. 4, 1999),
requires FRA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by State and local officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have federalism implications.'' ``Policies
that have federalism implications'' are defined in the Executive Order
to include regulations that have ``substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.'' Under Executive Order 13132, the agency
may not issue a regulation with federalism implications that imposes
substantial direct compliance costs and that is not required by
statute, unless the Federal government provides the funds necessary to
pay the direct compliance costs incurred by State and local
governments, or the agency consults with State and local government
officials early in the process of developing the regulation. Where a
regulation has federalism implications and preempts State law, the
agency seeks to consult with State and local officials in the process
of developing the regulation.
FRA has analyzed this NPRM in accordance with the principles and
[[Page 55341]]
criteria contained in Executive Order 13132. This NPRM complies with a
statutory mandate, and FRA believes it is in compliance with Executive
Order 13132.
This NPRM will not have a substantial effect on the States, on the
relationship between the Federal government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. In addition, this NPRM will not have any federalism
implications that impose substantial direct compliance costs on State
and local governments.
6. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Pursuant to Section 201 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104-4, 2 U.S.C. 1531), each Federal agency ``shall, unless
otherwise prohibited by law, assess the effects of Federal regulatory
actions on State, local, and tribal governments, and the private sector
(other than to the extent that such regulations incorporate
requirements specifically set forth in law).'' Section 202 of the Act
(2 U.S.C. 1532) further requires that ``before promulgating any general
notice of proposed rulemaking that is likely to result in the
promulgation of any rule that includes any Federal mandate that may
result in expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted
annually for inflation) in any 1 year, and before promulgating any
final rule for which a general notice of proposed rulemaking was
published, the agency shall prepare a written statement'' detailing the
effect on State, local, and tribal governments and the private sector.
This monetary amount of $100,000,000 has been adjusted to $140,800,000
to account for inflation. This proposed rule would not result in the
expenditure of more than $140,800,000 by the public sector in any one
year, and thus preparation of such a statement is not required.
7. Energy Impact
Executive Order 13211 requires Federal agencies to prepare a
Statement of Energy Effects for any ``significant energy action.'' 66
FR 28355 (May 22, 2001). Under the Executive Order, a ``significant
energy action'' is defined as any action by an agency (normally
published in the Federal Register) that promulgates or is expected to
lead to the promulgation of a final rule or regulation, including
notices of inquiry, advance notices of proposed rulemaking, and notices
of proposed rulemaking that: (1)(i) Is a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866 or any successor order, and (ii) is likely
to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or
use of energy; or (2) is designated by the Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy action.
FRA has evaluated this NPRM in accordance with Executive Order 13211.
FRA has determined that this NPRM will not have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. Consequently, FRA
has determined that this regulatory action is not a ``significant
energy action'' within the meaning of Executive Order 13211.
8. Privacy Act Information
Interested parties should be aware that anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all written communications and comments received
into any agency docket by the name of the individual submitting the
document (or signing the document, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477), or you may visit https://www.dot.gov/privacy.html.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 269
Railroads; Railroad employees.
The Proposed Rule
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, FRA proposes to amend
chapter II, subtitle B of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, as
follows:
1. Add a new part 269 to read as follows:
PART 269--ALTERNATE PASSENGER RAIL SERVICE PILOT PROGRAM
Sec.
269.1 Purpose.
269.3 Application.
269.5 Definitions.
269.7 Petitions.
269.9 Bid Process.
269.11 Evaluation.
269.13 Award.
269.15 Access to facilities; employees.
269.17 Cessation of service.
Authority: Sec. 214, Div. B, Pub. L. No. 110-432; 49 U.S.C.
24711; and 49 CFR 1.49.
Sec. 269.1 Purpose.
The purpose of this part is to carry out the statutory mandate set
forth in 49 U.S.C. 24711 requiring FRA to develop a pilot program that
permits a railroad that owns infrastructure over which Amtrak operates
a passenger rail service route to petition FRA to be considered as a
passenger rail service provider over that route in lieu of Amtrak.
Sec. 269.3 Application.
(a) Certification. This part will not be applicable to any
railroad, unless and until, the Secretary certifies that FRA has
sufficient resources that are adequate to undertake the pilot program
developed by this part. FRA will provide notice of the certification on
the FRA public Web site upon receipt.
(b) Route Limitations. The pilot program developed by this part
will not be made available to more than two Amtrak intercity passenger
rail routes.
(c) Time Limitations. Any railroad awarded a contract to provide
passenger rail service under the pilot program developed by this part
shall only provide such service for a period not to exceed either five
years after October 16, 2008, or a later date authorized by statute.
Sec. 269.5 Definitions.
As used in this part--
Act means the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008
(Pub. L. 110-432, Division B (Oct. 16, 2008)).
Administrator means the Federal Railroad Administrator, or the
Federal Railroad Administrator's delegate.
Amtrak means the National Railroad Passenger Corporation.
File and Filed mean submission of a document under this part on the
date the document was postmarked, or the date the document was e-mailed
to FRA.
Financial plan means a plan that contains, for each Federal fiscal
year fully or partially covered by the bid: an annual projection of the
revenues, expenses, capital expenditure requirements, and cash flows
(from operating activities, investing activities, and financing
activities, showing sources and uses of funds) attributable to the
route; and a statement of the assumptions underlying the financial
plan's contents.
FRA means the Federal Railroad Administration.
Operating plan means a plan that contains, for each Federal fiscal
year fully or partially covered by the bid: a complete description of
the service planned to be offered, including the train schedules,
frequencies, equipment consists, fare structures, and such amenities as
sleeping cars and food service provisions; station locations; hours of
operation; provisions for accommodating the traveling public, including
proposed arrangements for stations shared with other routes; expected
ridership; passenger-miles; revenues by class of service between
[[Page 55342]]
each city-pair proposed to be served; and a statement of the
assumptions underlying the operating plan's contents.
Passenger rail service route means those routes described in 49
U.S.C. 24102(5)(B), (C), and (D) or in 49 U.S.C. 24702.
Petitioner means a railroad, other than Amtrak, that has submitted
a petition to FRA under section 269.7 of this part.
Railroad means a rail carrier or rail carriers, as defined in 49
U.S.C. 10102(5).
Secretary means the Secretary of the U.S. Department of
Transportation.
Sec. 269.7 Petitions.
(a) In General. A railroad that owns infrastructure over which
Amtrak operates a passenger rail service route may petition FRA to be
considered as a passenger rail service provider over that route in lieu
of Amtrak for a period of time consistent with the time limitations
described in Sec. 269.3(c).
(b) Petition Requirements. Each petition shall:
(1) Be filed with FRA no later than 45 days after FRA provides
notice of the Secretary's certification pursuant to Sec. 269.3(a)
using the following method: e-mail to Priia214@dot.gov.;
(2) Describe the petition as a ``Petition to Provide Passenger Rail
Service under 49 CFR part 269''; and
(3) Describe the route or routes over which the petitioner wants to
provide passenger rail service and the Amtrak service that the
petitioner wants to replace.
(c) Future Petitions. In the event that a statute extends the time
period under which a railroad may provide passenger rail service
pursuant to the pilot program developed by this part, petitions under
this section shall be filed with FRA no later than 60 days after the
later of the enactment of such statutory authority or the Secretary's
issuance of the certification under Sec. 269.3(a), and shall otherwise
comply with the requirements of this part.
Sec. 269.9 Bid Process.
(a) Amtrak Notification. FRA will notify Amtrak of any eligible
petition filed with FRA no later than 30 days after FRA's receipt of
such petition.
(b) Bid Requirements. A petitioner and Amtrak must both file a bid
with FRA to provide passenger rail service over the route to which the
petition relates no later than 60 days after the petition deadline
established by Sec. 269.7 using the following method: e-mail to
Priia214@dot.gov. Each such bid must:
(1) Provide FRA with sufficient information to evaluate the level
of service described in the proposal, and to evaluate the proposal's
compliance with the requirements described in Sec. 269.13(b);
(2) Describe how the bidder would operate the route. This
description must include, but is not limited to, an operating plan, a
financial plan and, if applicable, any agreement(s) necessary for the
operation of passenger service over right-of-way on the route that is
not owned by the railroad. In addition, if the bidder intends to
generate any revenues from ancillary activities (i.e., activities other
than passenger transportation, accommodations, and food service) as
part of its proposed operation of the route, then the bidder must fully
describe such ancillary activities and identify their incremental
impact in all relevant sections of the operating plan and the financial
plan, and on the route's performance under the financial and
performance metrics developed pursuant to Sec. 207 of the Act,
together with the assumptions underlying the estimates of such
incremental impacts;
(3) Describe what Amtrak passenger equipment would be needed, if
any;
(4) Describe in detail, including amounts, timing, and intended
purpose, what sources of Federal and non-Federal funding the bidder
would use, including but not limited to any Federal or State operating
subsidy and any other Federal or State payments;
(5) Contain a staffing plan describing the number of employees
needed to operate the service, the job assignments and requirements,
and the terms of work for prospective and current employees of the
bidder for the service outlined in the bid; and
(6) Describe how the passenger rail service would comply with the
financial and performance metrics developed pursuant to Sec. 207 of
the Act. At a minimum, this description must include, for each Federal
fiscal year fully or partially covered by the bid: a projection of the
route's expected on-time performance and train delays according to the
metrics developed pursuant to Sec. 207 of the Act; and the net cash
used in operating activities per passenger-mile attributable to the
route.
(c) Supplemental Information. FRA may request supplemental
information from a petitioner and/or Amtrak where FRA determines such
information is needed to evaluate a bid. In such a request, FRA will
establish a deadline by which the supplemental information must be
filed with FRA.
Sec. 269.11 Evaluation.
FRA will select a winning bidder by evaluating the bids against the
financial and performance metrics developed under Sec. 207 of the Act
and the requirements of this part, and will give preference in awarding
contracts to bidders seeking to operate routes that have been
identified as one of the five worst performing Amtrak routes under 49
U.S.C. 24710.
Sec. 269.13 Award.
(a) Award. FRA will execute a contract with the winning bidder(s),
consistent with the requirements of this section and as FRA may
otherwise require, no later than 90 days after the bid deadline
established by Sec. 269.9(b). FRA will provide timely notice of these
selections to all petitioners and Amtrak.
(b) Contract Requirements. Among other things, the contract between
FRA and a winning bidder shall:
(1) Award to the winning bidder the right and obligation to provide
passenger rail service over that route subject to such performance
standards as FRA may require, consistent with the standards developed
under Sec. 207 of the Act, for a duration consistent with Sec.
269.3(c);
(2) Award to the winning bidder an operating subsidy for the first
year at a level not in excess of the level in effect during the fiscal
year preceding the fiscal year in which the petition was received,
adjusted for inflation, and for any subsequent years at such level,
adjusted for inflation;
(3) Condition the operating and subsidy rights upon the winning
bidder continuing to provide passenger rail service on the route that
is no less frequent, nor over a shorter distance, than Amtrak provided
on that route before the award;
(4) Condition the operating and subsidy rights upon the winning
bidder's compliance with the minimum standards established under Sec.
207 of the Act and such additional performance standards as FRA may
establish; and
(5) Subject the winning bidder to the grant conditions established
by 49 U.S.C. 24405.
(c) Staffing Plan Publication. The winning bidder shall make their
staffing plan required by Sec. 269.9(b)(4) available to the public
after the bid award.
Sec. 269.15 Access to facilities; employees.
(a) Access to Facilities. If the award under Sec. 269.13 is made
to a railroad other than Amtrak, Amtrak must provide access to its
reservation system, stations, and facilities directly related to
operations to the winning bidder awarded a contract under this part, in
accordance with Sec. 217 of the Act, necessary to carry out the
purposes of this part.
[[Page 55343]]
(b) Employees. The employees of any person used by a railroad in
the operation of a route under this part shall be considered an
employee of that railroad and subject to the applicable Federal laws
and regulations governing similar crafts or classes of employees of
Amtrak, including provisions under Sec. 121 of the Amtrak Reform and
Accountability Act of 1997 relating to employees who provide food and
beverage service.
(c) Hiring Preference. The winning bidder shall provide hiring
preference to qualified Amtrak employees displaced by the award of the
bid, consistent with the staffing plan submitted by the winning bidder.
Sec. 269.17 Cessation of service.
If a railroad awarded a route under this part ceases to operate the
service or fails to fulfill its obligations under the contract required
under Sec. 269.13, the Administrator, in collaboration with the
Surface Transportation Board, shall take any necessary action
consistent with title 49 of the United States Code to enforce the
contract and ensure the continued provision of service, including the
installment of an interim service provider and re-bidding the contract
to operate the service. The entity providing service shall either be
Amtrak or a railroad eligible for this pilot program under Sec. 269.7.
Issued in Washington DC on August 29, 2011.
Karen J. Rae,
Deputy Administrator, Federal Railroad Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-22699 Filed 9-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P