Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Keystone XL Project, 55155-55156 [2011-22689]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 6, 2011 / Notices
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Disaster Declaration #12768 and #12769]
Puerto Rico Disaster #PR–00014
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This is a Notice of the
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico (FEMA–4017–DR), dated
08/27/2011.
Incident: Hurricane Irene.
Incident Period: 08/21/2011 and
continuing.
Effective Date: 08/27/2011.
Physical Loan Application Deadline
Date: 10/26/2011.
Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan
Application Deadline Date: 05/28/2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
applications to: U.S. Small Business
Administration, Processing and
Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.
Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,
U.S. Small Business Administration,
409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050,
Washington, DC 20416.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that as a result of the
President’s major disaster declaration on
08/27/2011, applications for disaster
loans may be filed at the address listed
above or other locally announced
locations.
The following areas have been
determined to be adversely affected by
the disaster:
Primary Municipalities (Physical
Damage and Economic Injury Loans):
Caguas, Canovanas, Carolina, Cayey,
Loiza, Luquillo, San Juan.
Contiguous Municipalities (Economic
Injury Loans Only):
Puerto Rico: Aguas Buenas, Aibonito,
Catano, Ceiba, Cidra, Fajardo,
Guayama, Guaynabo, Gurabo,
Juncos, Las Piedras, Patillas, Rio
Grande, Salinas, San Lorenzo,
Trujillo Alto.
The Interest Rates are:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
For Physical Damage:
Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere ......................
Homeowners Without Credit
Available Elsewhere ..............
Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere ......................
Businesses
Without
Credit
Available Elsewhere ..............
Non-Profit Organizations With
Credit Available Elsewhere ...
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Sep 02, 2011
Percent
Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere .....................................
For Economic Injury:
Businesses & Small Agricultural
Cooperatives Without Credit
Available Elsewhere ..............
Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere .....................................
3.000
4.000
3.000
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers 59002 and 59008)
James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011–22656 Filed 9–2–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Disaster Declaration # 12762 and # 12763]
Louisiana Disaster # LA–00039
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This is a notice of an
Administrative declaration of a disaster
for the State of Louisiana dated 08/29/
2011.
Incident: Flooding.
Incident Period: 04/25/2011 through
07/07/2011.
Effective Date: 08/29/2011.
Physical Loan Application Deadline
Date: 10/28/2011.
Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan
Application Deadline Date: 05/29/2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
applications to: U.S. Small Business
Administration, Processing and
Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.
Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,
U.S. Small Business Administration,
409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050,
Washington, DC 20416.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
Percent
hereby given that as a result of the
Administrator’s disaster declaration,
applications for disaster loans may be
5.000 filed at the address listed above or other
locally announced locations.
2.500
The following areas have been
determined to be adversely affected by
6.000
the disaster:
4.000 Primary Parish: Concordia.
Contiguous Parishes/Counties:
Louisiana: Avoyelles, Catahoula,
3.250
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00158
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Pointe Coupee, Tensas, West
Feliciana.
Mississippi: Adams, Wilkinson.
The Interest Rates are:
Percent
The number assigned to this disaster
for physical damage is 127688 and for
economic injury is 127690.
SUMMARY:
55155
For Physical Damage:
Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere ......................
Homeowners Without Credit
Available Elsewhere ..............
Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere ......................
Businesses
Without
Credit
Available Elsewhere ..............
Non-Profit Organizations With
Credit Available Elsewhere ...
Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere .....................................
For Economic Injury:
Businesses & Small Agricultural
Cooperatives Without Credit
Available Elsewhere ..............
Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere .....................................
5.375
2.688
6.000
4.000
3.250
3.000
4.000
3.000
The number assigned to this disaster
for physical damage is 12762 6 and for
economic injury is 12763 0.
The States which received an EIDL
Declaration # are: Louisiana,
Mississippi.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers 59002 and 59008).
Dated: August 26, 2011.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011–22650 Filed 9–2–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 7576]
Final Environmental Impact Statement
for the Proposed Keystone XL Project
Department of State.
Notice of availability of the final
environmental impact statement for the
proposed Keystone XL Project.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Consistent with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, as amended, the staff of the U.S.
Department of State (DOS) prepared a
final environmental impact statement
(final EIS) for the proposed Keystone XL
Project (Project). On September 19,
2008, the applicant, TransCanada
Keystone Pipeline, LP (TransCanada)
filed an application for a Presidential
Permit for the construction, operation,
and maintenance of pipeline facilities at
the border of the U.S. and Canada for
the transport of crude oil across the
U.S./Canada international boundary.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM
06SEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
55156
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 6, 2011 / Notices
TransCanada has requested
authorization to construct and operate
border crossing facilities at the U.S./
Canadian border in Phillips County,
near Morgan, Montana, in connection
with the proposed Project that is
designed to transport crude oil
produced from oil sands in the Western
Canadian Sedimentary Basin (WCSB)
and other sources to a proposed oil
storage facility in Cushing, Oklahoma,
and to a delivery points near Nederland
and Moore Junction, Texas.
The Secretary of State is designated
and empowered to receive all
applications for Presidential permits, as
referred to in Executive Order 13337, as
amended, for the construction,
connection, operation, or maintenance
at the borders of the United States, of
facilities for the exportation or
importation of petroleum, petroleum
products, coal, or other fuels to or from
a foreign country. As a part of the
review of the application for
Presidential Permits, the Secretary of
State must determinate whether or not
the projects would be in the national
interest. The determination of national
interest involves consideration of many
factors, including energy security;
environmental, cultural, and economic
impacts. Before making a decision on
the proposed Project, DOS will consult
with the eight federal agencies
identified in Executive Order 13337:
The Departments of Energy, Defense,
Transportation, Homeland Security,
Justice, Interior, and Commerce, and the
Environmental Protection Agency. DOS
will also solicit public input on the
national interest determination by
accepting written comments and
holding comment meetings in the six
states traversed by the proposed route
and a final meeting in Washington, DC.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The final
EIS was prepared consistent with the
requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the
Council on Environmental Quality
regulations implementing NEPA (40
CFR 1500), and the DOS regulations for
implementing NEPA (22 CFR 161). The
final EIS includes an appendix that was
prepared consistent with the
requirements of the Montana
Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) and
the Montana Major Facility Siting Act
(MFSA). The final EIS describes the
proposed Project; the purpose of and
need for the proposed Project;
alternatives to the proposed Project,
including the No Action Alternative,
system alternatives, alternative routes,
alternative pipeline designs, and
alternative sites for aboveground
facilities; the potential impacts of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Sep 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
proposed Project and alternatives;
cumulative impacts associated with
construction and operation of the
proposed Project; issues related to
potential spills from the proposed
Project; and the agency-preferred
alternative. The final EIS addresses the
potential environmental effects of the
construction and operation of the
portion of the proposed Keystone XL
Project in the U.S., as well as connected
actions to that project such as the
construction of powerlines to serve
pump stations on the pipeline and two
projects that would provide shipping
access on the pipeline to domestic crude
oil producers. DOS assessed the
potential impacts of the projects based
on currently available information.
The Federal and State agencies that
served as Cooperating Agencies in the
development of the EIS consisted of the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; the U.S.
Department of Agriculture—Natural
Resources Conservation Service, Farm
Service Agency, and Rural Utilities
Service; the U.S. Department of
Energy—Office of Policy and
International Affairs and Western Area
Power Administration; the U.S.
Department of the Interior—Bureau of
Land Management, National Park
Service, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service; the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), Office of Pipeline Safety; the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency;
and the Montana Department of
Environmental Quality. Cooperating
agencies either have jurisdiction by law
or special expertise with respect to the
environmental impacts assessed in
connection with the proposal and are
involved in the DOS analysis of those
environmental impacts. BLM’s purpose
and need in preparing an EIS for the
proposed Project is to respond to the
Keystone application under Section 28
of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as
amended (MLA; 30 U.S.C. 185) for a
right-of-way (ROW) grant to construct,
operate, maintain, and decommission a
crude oil pipeline and related facilities
on federal lands in compliance with the
MLA, BLM ROW regulations, and other
applicable federal laws. BLM will
decide whether to approve, approve
with modification, or deny issuance of
a ROW grant to Keystone for the
proposed Project, and if so, under what
terms and conditions. The proposed
ROW action appears consistent with
approved BLM land use planning.
In total, the Keystone XL Project
would consist of approximately 1,711
miles of new, 36-inch-diameter
pipeline, with approximately 327 miles
of pipeline in Canada and 1,384 miles
PO 00000
Frm 00159
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
in the U.S. The overall proposed
Keystone XL Project is estimated to cost
$7 billion. If permitted, it would begin
operation in 2013, with the actual date
dependent on the necessary permits,
approvals, and authorizations.
The following U.S. counties could
possibly be affected by construction of
the proposed Project:
• Montana: Phillips, Valley, McCone,
Dawson, Prairie, Fallon.
• South Dakota: Harding, Butte,
Perkins, Meade, Pennington, Haakon,
Jones, Lyman, Tripp.
• Nebraska: Keya Paha, Rock, Holt,
Garfield, Wheeler, Greeley, Boone,
Nance, Merrick, Hamilton, York,
Fillmore, Saline, Jefferson.
• Kansas: Clay, Butler.
• Oklahoma: Atoka, Bryan, Coal,
Creek, Hughes, Lincoln, Okfuskee,
Payne, Seminole.
• Texas: Angelina, Cherokee, Delta,
Fannin, Franklin, Hardin, Hopkins,
Jefferson, Lamar, Liberty, Nacogdoches,
Polk, Rusk, Smith, Upshur, Wood,
Chambers, Harris.
Copies of the final EIS have been
mailed to interested federal, state and
local agencies; public interest groups;
individuals and affected landowners
who requested a copy of the final EIS or
who provided comments during the
scoping period or the public comment
periods on the draft and supplemental
draft EISs; libraries; newspapers; and
other stakeholders.
The
DOS Project Web site (https://
www.keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov)
provides Project-related information for
viewing and downloading, including
the Keystone application for a
Presidential Permit and associated maps
and drawings, supplemental
information filed by Keystone, the final
EIS, and a list of libraries where the
final EIS may be viewed.
For information on the proposed
Project or the final EIS, contact
Alexander Yuan, OES/ENV Room 2657,
U.S. Department of State, Washington,
DC 20520, or by telephone (202) 647–
4284, or by fax at (202) 647–5947.
Issued in Washington, DC, on
September 2, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dated: August 30, 2011.
John E. Thompson,
Acting Director, Bureau of Oceans and
International Environmental and Scientific
Affairs/Office of Environmental Policy, U.S.
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011–22689 Filed 9–2–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–09–P
E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM
06SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 6, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55155-55156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-22689]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 7576]
Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Keystone XL
Project
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Notice of availability of the final environmental impact
statement for the proposed Keystone XL Project.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Consistent with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
of 1969, as amended, the staff of the U.S. Department of State (DOS)
prepared a final environmental impact statement (final EIS) for the
proposed Keystone XL Project (Project). On September 19, 2008, the
applicant, TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP (TransCanada) filed an
application for a Presidential Permit for the construction, operation,
and maintenance of pipeline facilities at the border of the U.S. and
Canada for the transport of crude oil across the U.S./Canada
international boundary.
[[Page 55156]]
TransCanada has requested authorization to construct and operate border
crossing facilities at the U.S./Canadian border in Phillips County,
near Morgan, Montana, in connection with the proposed Project that is
designed to transport crude oil produced from oil sands in the Western
Canadian Sedimentary Basin (WCSB) and other sources to a proposed oil
storage facility in Cushing, Oklahoma, and to a delivery points near
Nederland and Moore Junction, Texas.
The Secretary of State is designated and empowered to receive all
applications for Presidential permits, as referred to in Executive
Order 13337, as amended, for the construction, connection, operation,
or maintenance at the borders of the United States, of facilities for
the exportation or importation of petroleum, petroleum products, coal,
or other fuels to or from a foreign country. As a part of the review of
the application for Presidential Permits, the Secretary of State must
determinate whether or not the projects would be in the national
interest. The determination of national interest involves consideration
of many factors, including energy security; environmental, cultural,
and economic impacts. Before making a decision on the proposed Project,
DOS will consult with the eight federal agencies identified in
Executive Order 13337: The Departments of Energy, Defense,
Transportation, Homeland Security, Justice, Interior, and Commerce, and
the Environmental Protection Agency. DOS will also solicit public input
on the national interest determination by accepting written comments
and holding comment meetings in the six states traversed by the
proposed route and a final meeting in Washington, DC.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The final EIS was prepared consistent with
the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the
Council on Environmental Quality regulations implementing NEPA (40 CFR
1500), and the DOS regulations for implementing NEPA (22 CFR 161). The
final EIS includes an appendix that was prepared consistent with the
requirements of the Montana Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) and the
Montana Major Facility Siting Act (MFSA). The final EIS describes the
proposed Project; the purpose of and need for the proposed Project;
alternatives to the proposed Project, including the No Action
Alternative, system alternatives, alternative routes, alternative
pipeline designs, and alternative sites for aboveground facilities; the
potential impacts of the proposed Project and alternatives; cumulative
impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed
Project; issues related to potential spills from the proposed Project;
and the agency-preferred alternative. The final EIS addresses the
potential environmental effects of the construction and operation of
the portion of the proposed Keystone XL Project in the U.S., as well as
connected actions to that project such as the construction of
powerlines to serve pump stations on the pipeline and two projects that
would provide shipping access on the pipeline to domestic crude oil
producers. DOS assessed the potential impacts of the projects based on
currently available information.
The Federal and State agencies that served as Cooperating Agencies
in the development of the EIS consisted of the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers; the U.S. Department of Agriculture--Natural Resources
Conservation Service, Farm Service Agency, and Rural Utilities Service;
the U.S. Department of Energy--Office of Policy and International
Affairs and Western Area Power Administration; the U.S. Department of
the Interior--Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service, and
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; the U.S. Department of Transportation,
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Office
of Pipeline Safety; the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; and the
Montana Department of Environmental Quality. Cooperating agencies
either have jurisdiction by law or special expertise with respect to
the environmental impacts assessed in connection with the proposal and
are involved in the DOS analysis of those environmental impacts. BLM's
purpose and need in preparing an EIS for the proposed Project is to
respond to the Keystone application under Section 28 of the Mineral
Leasing Act of 1920, as amended (MLA; 30 U.S.C. 185) for a right-of-way
(ROW) grant to construct, operate, maintain, and decommission a crude
oil pipeline and related facilities on federal lands in compliance with
the MLA, BLM ROW regulations, and other applicable federal laws. BLM
will decide whether to approve, approve with modification, or deny
issuance of a ROW grant to Keystone for the proposed Project, and if
so, under what terms and conditions. The proposed ROW action appears
consistent with approved BLM land use planning.
In total, the Keystone XL Project would consist of approximately
1,711 miles of new, 36-inch-diameter pipeline, with approximately 327
miles of pipeline in Canada and 1,384 miles in the U.S. The overall
proposed Keystone XL Project is estimated to cost $7 billion. If
permitted, it would begin operation in 2013, with the actual date
dependent on the necessary permits, approvals, and authorizations.
The following U.S. counties could possibly be affected by
construction of the proposed Project:
Montana: Phillips, Valley, McCone, Dawson, Prairie,
Fallon.
South Dakota: Harding, Butte, Perkins, Meade, Pennington,
Haakon, Jones, Lyman, Tripp.
Nebraska: Keya Paha, Rock, Holt, Garfield, Wheeler,
Greeley, Boone, Nance, Merrick, Hamilton, York, Fillmore, Saline,
Jefferson.
Kansas: Clay, Butler.
Oklahoma: Atoka, Bryan, Coal, Creek, Hughes, Lincoln,
Okfuskee, Payne, Seminole.
Texas: Angelina, Cherokee, Delta, Fannin, Franklin,
Hardin, Hopkins, Jefferson, Lamar, Liberty, Nacogdoches, Polk, Rusk,
Smith, Upshur, Wood, Chambers, Harris.
Copies of the final EIS have been mailed to interested federal,
state and local agencies; public interest groups; individuals and
affected landowners who requested a copy of the final EIS or who
provided comments during the scoping period or the public comment
periods on the draft and supplemental draft EISs; libraries;
newspapers; and other stakeholders.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The DOS Project Web site (https://www.keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov) provides Project-related information
for viewing and downloading, including the Keystone application for a
Presidential Permit and associated maps and drawings, supplemental
information filed by Keystone, the final EIS, and a list of libraries
where the final EIS may be viewed.
For information on the proposed Project or the final EIS, contact
Alexander Yuan, OES/ENV Room 2657, U.S. Department of State,
Washington, DC 20520, or by telephone (202) 647-4284, or by fax at
(202) 647-5947.
Issued in Washington, DC, on September 2, 2011.
Dated: August 30, 2011.
John E. Thompson,
Acting Director, Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and
Scientific Affairs/Office of Environmental Policy, U.S. Department of
State.
[FR Doc. 2011-22689 Filed 9-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-09-P