Aquatic Ecosystems, Water Quality, and Global Change: Challenges of Conducting Multi-Stressor Vulnerability Assessments-Release of Final Report, 55060-55061 [2011-22669]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
55060
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 6, 2011 / Notices
new, revision, extension, or
reinstatement); (5) response obligation
(i.e., mandatory, voluntary, or required
to obtain or retain benefits); (6) a
description of the need for and
proposed use of the information; (7) a
categorical description of the likely
respondents; (8) estimated number of
respondents annually; (9) an estimate of
the total annual reporting burden in
hours (i.e., the estimated number of
likely respondents times the proposed
frequency of response per year times the
average hours per response); and (10) an
estimate of the total annual reporting
and recordkeeping cost burden (in
thousands of dollars).
1. EIA–176, EIA–191, EIA–757, EIA–
857, EIA–895, EIA–910, and EIA–912.
2. U.S. Energy Information
Administration.
3. OMB Number 1905–0175.
4. Revision and three-year extension.
5. All forms are mandatory except
EIA–895, which is voluntary.
6. The purpose of the Natural Gas
Data Collection Program Package is to
collect basic and detailed data to meet
the EIA’s mandates and energy data
users’ needs. Adequate evaluation of the
natural gas industry requires collection
and processing of data related to natural
gas production, processing,
transmission, distribution, storage,
marketing, and consumption. The data
that the EIA collects are used to address
significant energy industry issues. In
line with its mandated responsibility to
collect data that adequately describe the
natural gas marketplace, the EIA
evaluates the lifecycle of natural gas
from its reserves and production to
consumption and prices throughout the
upstream and downstream markets. The
data collected by the Natural Gas Data
Collection Program Package surveys are
among those that are required to address
the status and future of the role of
natural gas in the energy mix and
overall economy. Among the data series
resulting from the information collected
in these surveys is the rate, location,
and source of natural gas produced and
entering the market, the quantities being
stored and the location of the storage,
and the quantities being delivered to
various consuming sectors. Prices are
also reported on at various points in the
production and distribution stream.
7. Business or other for-profit.
8. 3218 Respondents.
9. Annual total of 50,131 hours, and
respondent frequency is as follows:
Forms EIA–176 and EIA–757 Schedule
B are collected annually; forms EIA–
191, EIA–857, and EIA–910 are
collected monthly; EIA–757 Schedule A
is collected once every three years; and
Form EIA–912 is collected weekly.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Sep 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
10. Annual total of $0.
Please refer to the supporting
statement as well as the proposed forms
and instructions for more information
about the purpose, who must report,
when to report, where to submit, the
elements to be reported, detailed
instructions, provisions for
confidentiality, and uses (including
possible nonstatistical uses) of the
information. For instructions on
obtaining materials, see the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Statutory Authority: Section 13(b) of the
Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974,
P.L. 93–275, codified at 15 U.S.C. 772(b).
Issued in Washington, DC, August 30,
2011.
Stephanie Brown,
Director, Office of Survey Development and
Statistical Integration, Energy Information
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–22682 Filed 9–2–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9459–7]
Aquatic Ecosystems, Water Quality,
and Global Change: Challenges of
Conducting Multi-Stressor
Vulnerability Assessments—Release
of Final Report
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
AGENCY:
EPA is releasing a final report
entitled, Aquatic Ecosystems, Water
Quality, and Global Change: Challenges
of Conducting Multi-stressor
Vulnerability Assessments, (EPA/600/
R–11/011F). The document was
prepared by the National Center for
Environmental Assessment (NCEA)
within EPA’s Office of Research and
Development.
This report investigates the issues and
challenges associated with identifying,
calculating, and mapping indicators of
the relative vulnerability of water
quality and aquatic ecosystems across
the United States to the potential
impacts of global change. Using a large
set of environmental indicators drawn
from scientific literature and data, this
final report explores the conceptual and
practical challenges associated with
using such indicators to assess the
resilience of ecosystems and human
systems to a variety of existing stresses
and mal-adaptations.
DATES: The report was posted publicly
on August 26, 2011.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The report, Aquatic
Ecosystems, Water Quality, and Global
Change: Challenges of Conducting
Multi-stressor Vulnerability
Assessments, is available primarily via
the Internet on the National Center for
Environmental Assessment’s home page
under the Recent Additions and the
Data and Publications menus at https://
www.epa.gov/ncea. A limited number of
paper copies are available from the
Information Management Team, NCEA;
telephone: 703–347–8561; facsimile:
703–347–8691. If you are requesting a
paper copy, please provide your name,
mailing address, and the document title.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information, contact the
National Center for Environmental
Assessment; Chris Weaver; telephone:
703–347–8621; facsimile: 703–347–
8694; or e-mail: weaver.chris@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Information About the Project/
Document
This report investigates the issues and
challenges associated with identifying,
calculating, and mapping indicators of
relative vulnerability of water quality
and aquatic ecosystems across the
United States to the potential adverse
impacts of external forces, such as longterm climate and land-use change.
The report does not directly evaluate
the potential impacts of global change
on ecosystems and watersheds. Rather,
it explores the assumption that the
impacts of existing stressors will be a
key input to any comprehensive global
change vulnerability assessment, and
the impacts of global change will be
expressed via interactions with these
stressors. To date, there has been
relatively little exploration of the
assumption that the practical challenges
associated with assessing the resilience
of ecosystems and human systems might
vary as a result of existing global change
stresses and mal-adaptations. The work
described in this report is a preliminary
attempt at such an exploration.
This report uses more than 600
indicators of water quality and aquatic
ecosystem conditions drawn from
numerous scientific literature and
datasets from within EPA, additional
Federal agencies, and other
organizations. The report serves as a
starting point for identifying challenges
in calculating and mapping national
vulnerabilities. The challenges
identified include gaps in ideas,
methods, data, and tools. Some of those
specific challenges are:
• Identifying those indicators that
speak specifically to ‘‘vulnerability’’ as
opposed to those reflecting simply a
state or condition;
E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM
06SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 6, 2011 / Notices
• Calculating and estimating the
values of these vulnerability indicators,
including establishing important
indicator thresholds that reflect abrupt
or large changes in the vulnerability of
water quality or aquatic ecosystems;
• Mapping these vulnerability
indicators nationally, including data
availability and spatial aggregation of
the data; and
• Combining and compositing
indicators and developing multiindicator indices of vulnerability.
This report is intended to be a
building block for future work on multistressor global change vulnerability
assessments. Hopefully, it will
contribute to improve links between the
decision support needs of the water
quality and aquatic ecosystem
management communities and the
priorities and capabilities of the global
change science data and modeling
communities.
Dated: August 15, 2011.
Joseph DeSantis,
Acting Director, National Center for
Environmental Assessment.
[FR Doc. 2011–22669 Filed 9–2–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Comments must be submitted on
or before October 6, 2011.
DATES:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Two Proposed CERCLA Administrative
Settlement Agreements for Long-Term
Access at the Bountiful/Woods Cross
5th South PCE Plume NPL Site, Davis
County, UT
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Notice; Request for public
comment.
AGENCY:
In accordance with section
122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act, as
amended (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C.
9622(h)(1), notice is hereby given of two
proposed Administrative Settlement
Agreements for long-term access at the
Bountiful/Woods Cross 5th South PCE
Plume Site. The PCE plume extends in
area through the Cities of Bountiful,
West Bountiful and Woods Cross in
Davis County, Utah. The proposed
Settlement Agreements are with Davis
County and Security Investment Ltd.
(hereinafter jointly referred to as
‘‘settling parties’’). The Settlement
Agreements require the settling parties
to provide the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) and the Utah
Department of Environmental Quality
SUMMARY:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The proposed Settlement
Agreements are also available for public
inspection at the EPA Region 8 Records
Center located on the second floor at
1595 Wynkoop Street, in Denver,
Colorado, during normal business
hours. A copy of the proposed
settlement(s) may be obtained from
Carol Pokorny, Enforcement Specialist,
U.S. EPA, 1595 Wynkoop Street,
Denver, Colorado 80202–1129. Ms.
Pokorny can be reached at (303) 312–
6970. Comments should reference the
Bountiful/Woods Cross 5th South PCE
Plume NPL Site, the EPA Docket No.
CERCLA–08–2011–015 and EPA Docket
No. CERCLA–08–2011–016, and should
be addressed to Ms. Pokorny at the
address given above.
ADDRESSES:
[FRL–9459–6]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
with long-term access (estimated to be
approximately 60 years) for the
construction, operation and
maintenance of the PCE plume pump
and treat infrastructure. In exchange, the
settling parties’ potential CERCLA civil
liability at their respective properties
will be resolved. The Settlement
Agreements include an EPA covenant
not to sue the settling parties pursuant
to sections 106 and 107 of CERCLA, 42
U.S.C. 9606 and 9607. For thirty (30)
days following the date of publication of
this notice, the United States will
receive written comments relating to
either or both of the Settlement
Agreements. The United States will
consider all comments received and
may modify or withdraw its consent to
the Settlement Agreements if comments
received disclose facts or considerations
which indicate that the Settlement
Agreements are inappropriate,
improper, or inadequate. The United
States’ response to any comments
received will be available for public
inspection at the Davis County Library,
South Branch, 725 South Main Street, in
Bountiful, UT 84010–6326. (801) 294–
4054.
18:00 Sep 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carol Pokorny, USEPA, Technical
Enforcement Program, 1595 Wynkoop
Street, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129.
Telephone: (303) 312–6970.
Dated: August 26, 2011.
Andrew M. Gaydosh,
Assistant Regional Administrator, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2011–22672 Filed 9–2–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55061
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Information Collection Being Reviewed
by the Federal Communications
Commission
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Federal Communications
Commission (FCC), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
burdens, invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995. Comments are
requested concerning (a) Whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission,
including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
the Commission’s burden estimate; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collected; (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology;
and (e) ways to further reduce the
information collection burden on small
business concerns with fewer than 25
employees.
The FCC may not conduct or sponsor
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
PRA that does not display a valid Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
control number.
DATES: Written PRA comments should
be submitted on or before November 7,
2011. If you anticipate that you will be
submitting comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the contact listed below as soon
as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to
the Federal Communications
Commission via e-mail to PRA@fcc.gov
and Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information about the
information collection, contact Cathy
Williams at (202) 418–2918.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060–0888.
Title: Section 1.221, Notice of hearing;
appearances; Section 1.229 Motions to
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM
06SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 6, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55060-55061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-22669]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-9459-7]
Aquatic Ecosystems, Water Quality, and Global Change: Challenges
of Conducting Multi-Stressor Vulnerability Assessments--Release of
Final Report
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is releasing a final report entitled, Aquatic Ecosystems,
Water Quality, and Global Change: Challenges of Conducting Multi-
stressor Vulnerability Assessments, (EPA/600/R-11/011F). The document
was prepared by the National Center for Environmental Assessment (NCEA)
within EPA's Office of Research and Development.
This report investigates the issues and challenges associated with
identifying, calculating, and mapping indicators of the relative
vulnerability of water quality and aquatic ecosystems across the United
States to the potential impacts of global change. Using a large set of
environmental indicators drawn from scientific literature and data,
this final report explores the conceptual and practical challenges
associated with using such indicators to assess the resilience of
ecosystems and human systems to a variety of existing stresses and mal-
adaptations.
DATES: The report was posted publicly on August 26, 2011.
ADDRESSES: The report, Aquatic Ecosystems, Water Quality, and Global
Change: Challenges of Conducting Multi-stressor Vulnerability
Assessments, is available primarily via the Internet on the National
Center for Environmental Assessment's home page under the Recent
Additions and the Data and Publications menus at https://www.epa.gov/ncea. A limited number of paper copies are available from the
Information Management Team, NCEA; telephone: 703-347-8561; facsimile:
703-347-8691. If you are requesting a paper copy, please provide your
name, mailing address, and the document title.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information, contact
the National Center for Environmental Assessment; Chris Weaver;
telephone: 703-347-8621; facsimile: 703-347-8694; or e-mail:
weaver.chris@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Information About the Project/Document
This report investigates the issues and challenges associated with
identifying, calculating, and mapping indicators of relative
vulnerability of water quality and aquatic ecosystems across the United
States to the potential adverse impacts of external forces, such as
long-term climate and land-use change.
The report does not directly evaluate the potential impacts of
global change on ecosystems and watersheds. Rather, it explores the
assumption that the impacts of existing stressors will be a key input
to any comprehensive global change vulnerability assessment, and the
impacts of global change will be expressed via interactions with these
stressors. To date, there has been relatively little exploration of the
assumption that the practical challenges associated with assessing the
resilience of ecosystems and human systems might vary as a result of
existing global change stresses and mal-adaptations. The work described
in this report is a preliminary attempt at such an exploration.
This report uses more than 600 indicators of water quality and
aquatic ecosystem conditions drawn from numerous scientific literature
and datasets from within EPA, additional Federal agencies, and other
organizations. The report serves as a starting point for identifying
challenges in calculating and mapping national vulnerabilities. The
challenges identified include gaps in ideas, methods, data, and tools.
Some of those specific challenges are:
Identifying those indicators that speak specifically to
``vulnerability'' as opposed to those reflecting simply a state or
condition;
[[Page 55061]]
Calculating and estimating the values of these
vulnerability indicators, including establishing important indicator
thresholds that reflect abrupt or large changes in the vulnerability of
water quality or aquatic ecosystems;
Mapping these vulnerability indicators nationally,
including data availability and spatial aggregation of the data; and
Combining and compositing indicators and developing multi-
indicator indices of vulnerability.
This report is intended to be a building block for future work on
multi-stressor global change vulnerability assessments. Hopefully, it
will contribute to improve links between the decision support needs of
the water quality and aquatic ecosystem management communities and the
priorities and capabilities of the global change science data and
modeling communities.
Dated: August 15, 2011.
Joseph DeSantis,
Acting Director, National Center for Environmental Assessment.
[FR Doc. 2011-22669 Filed 9-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P