Fenamiphos; Proposed Data Call-In Order for Pesticide Tolerance, 54185-54188 [2011-22127]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 169 / Wednesday, August 31, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Commenters may use PRC Form 61,
which is available on the Commission’s
Web site, https://www.prc.gov.
§ 3025.20
The record on review.
(a) The record on review includes:
(1) The final determination;
(2) The notices to persons served by
the post office to be closed or
consolidated;
(3) The administrative record;
(4) All documents submitted in the
appeal proceeding; and
(5) Facts of which the Commission
can properly take official notice.
(b) However, a petitioner or
commenter may dispute factual matters
or conclusions drawn in the
administrative record.
§ 3025.21
record.
Filing of the administrative
The Postal Service shall file the
administrative record within 10 days of
the date of posting of a Petition for
Review on the Commission’s Web site.
The Commission may alter this time for
good cause. The Postal Service shall
notify participants who do not file
electronically of the filing of the
administrative record. Such notification
shall be made by First-Class Mail.
§ 3025.22 Making documents available for
inspection by the public.
Copies of all filings (including the
administrative record) related to an
appeal shall be available for public
inspection at the post office whose
closure or consolidation is under
review. If that post office has been
suspended or closed, the filings shall be
available at the nearest open post office.
The Postal Service must notify all
petitioners and commenters of the
location(s) (other than the Commission
offices) where the filings may be
inspected. Such notification shall be
made by First-Class Mail.
§ 3025.30
Suspension pending review.
A final determination to close or
consolidate a post office is suspended
until final disposition by the
Commission when a person files a
timely Petition for Review.
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 3025.40
Participant statement.
(a) When a timely Petition for Review
of a decision to close or consolidate a
post office is filed, the Secretary shall
furnish petitioner with a copy of PRC
Form 61. This form is designed to
inform petitioners on how to make a
statement of his/her arguments in
support of the petition.
(b) The instructions for Form 61 shall
provide:
(1) A concise explanation of the
purpose of the form;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:28 Aug 30, 2011
Jkt 223001
(2) A copy of section 404(d)(2)(A) of
title 39, U.S. Code; and
(3) Notification that, if petitioner
prefers, he or she may file a brief in lieu
of or in addition to completing PRC
Form 61.
§ 3025.41 Due date for participant
statement.
The statement or brief of petitioner
and of any other participant supporting
petitioner shall be filed not more than
20 days after the filing of the
administrative record.
§ 3025.42 Due date for Postal Service
response.
The statement or brief of the Postal
Service and of any other participant
supporting the Postal Service shall be
filed not more than 14 days after the
date for filing of petitioner’s statement.
§ 3025.43
Service.
Due date for replies to the Postal
Petitioner and any other participant
supporting petitioner may file a reply to
the Postal Service response not more
than 7 days after the date of the Postal
Service response. Replies are limited to
issues discussed in the Postal Service’s
response.
[FR Doc. 2011–22009 Filed 8–30–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–0702; FRL–8886–2]
Fenamiphos; Proposed Data Call-In
Order for Pesticide Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed order.
AGENCY:
This document proposes to
require the submission of various data
required to support the continuation of
the tolerances for the pesticide
fenamiphos. Pesticide tolerances are
established under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before October 31, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–0702, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54185
• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket
Facility’s normal hours of operation
(8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is
(703) 305–5805.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–
0702. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the docket
without change and may be made
available on-line at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through regulations.gov or email. The regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the docket and made available
on the Internet. If you submit an
electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other
contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the docket index available
at https://www.regulations.gov. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either in the
electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S–
4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
E:\FR\FM\31AUP1.SGM
31AUP1
54186
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 169 / Wednesday, August 31, 2011 / Proposed Rules
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
hours of operation of this Docket
Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The Docket Facility telephone
number is (703) 305–5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric
Miederhoff, Pesticide Re-evaluation
Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (703) 347–8028; e-mail address:
miederhoff.eric@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
B. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD–ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD–ROM the specific information that
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:28 Aug 30, 2011
Jkt 223001
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns and suggest
alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. FFDCA Data Call-In Authority
In this document, EPA proposes to
issue an order requiring the submission
of various data to support the
continuation of the fenamiphos
tolerances at 40 CFR 180.349. Under
section 408(f) of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C.
346a(f), EPA is authorized to require, by
order, submission of data ‘‘reasonably
required to support the continuation of
a tolerance’’ when such data cannot be
obtained under the Data Call-In
authority of section 3(c)(2)(B) of the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (‘‘FIFRA’’), 7 U.S.C.
136a(c)(2)(B), or section 4 of the Toxic
Substances Control Act (‘‘TSCA’’), 15
U.S.C. 2603. A section 408(f) Data CallIn order may only be issued following
notice and a comment period of not less
than 60 days.
A section 408(f) Data Call-In order
must contain the following elements:
• A requirement that one or more
persons submit to EPA a notice
identifying the person(s) who commit(s)
to submit the data required in the order;
• A description of the required data
and the required reports connected to
such data;
• An explanation of why the required
data could not be obtained under
section 3(c)(2)(B) of FIFRA or section 4
of TSCA; and
• The required submission date for
the notice identifying one or more
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
interested persons who commit to
submit the required data and the
required submission dates for all the
data and reports required in the order.
(21 U.S.C. 346a(f)(1)(C)).
EPA may by order modify or revoke
the affected tolerances if any one of the
following submissions is not made in a
timely manner:
• A notice identifying the one or
more interested persons who commit to
submit the data;
• The data itself; or
• The reports required under a
section 408(f) order are not submitted by
the date specified in the order. (21
U.S.C. 346a(f)(2)).
III. Regulatory Background for
Fenamiphos
Fenamiphos is an organophosphate
nematicide/insecticide. It is not
currently registered under FIFRA.
Fenamiphos’ last FIFRA registration was
canceled in 2007. However, four FFDCA
tolerances remain for residues of
fenamiphos on the following
commodities: Pineapples, grapes,
raisins, and bananas (40 CFR 180.349).
Since there are currently no domestic
registrations for fenamiphos, these
tolerances are referred to as ‘‘import
tolerances.’’
Fenamiphos is a member of a family
of pesticides known as the
organophosphates. EPA has concluded
fenamiphos and other organophosphate
pesticides share a common mechanism
of toxicity. As with other
organophosphates, the principal toxic
effects induced by fenamiphos are
related to its cholinesterase-inhibiting
activity. In animal laboratory studies, it
produces the associated clinical signs
such as tremors, unsteady gait,
decreased activity, salivation, and
disturbed balance in rats and rabbits,
and decreased cholinesterase activity
(plasma, brain) in rats and rabbits
following acute, subchronic, and
chronic oral exposure.
In February 2002, EPA issued an
Interim Reregistration Eligibility
Decision (IRED) for fenamiphos. The
IRED evaluated the potential human
health and ecological risks associated
with all registered uses of fenamiphos.
In connection with its obligation under
the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996
(FQPA), the Agency also evaluated
whether all fenamiphos tolerances in
existence at the time of the passage of
FQPA met the revised safety standard
that the FQPA adopted for FFDCA
section 408. In the IRED, EPA
concluded that the risks of fenamiphos
when evaluated in isolation from other
organophosphates met the revised safety
standard in FFDCA section 408. This
E:\FR\FM\31AUP1.SGM
31AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 169 / Wednesday, August 31, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
conclusion was labeled ‘‘interim,’’
however, because EPA had not yet
completed a cumulative risk assessment
for the organophosphates. In July 2006,
EPA completed its cumulative risk
assessment for the organophosphate
pesticides finding that these tolerances
met the revised safety standard.
In June 2010, in response to a
registrant’s interest in supporting
tolerances for import purposes, the
Agency completed a revised human
health risk assessment for fenamiphos.
As there are no domestic registrations
for fenamiphos products, the assessment
was limited to an evaluation of the
potential dietary risk from exposure to
fenamiphos residues in imported food
commodities. This assessment utilized
updated risk assessment methodologies
from those that were used for the IRED’s
dietary assessment. The 2010
assessment concluded that potential
exposure to fenamiphos residues in or
on imported food commodities exceeds
the Agency’s level of concern.
The 2010 assessment identified
several studies that were needed to
verify the accuracy of the assumptions
used in the Agency’s evaluation of
dietary exposure to imported
commodities treated with fenamiphos or
that were needed to meet a new data
requirement. The necessary data
include: A comparative chlolinesterase
assay, residue data for grape, and an
immunotoxicity study. These data
requirements are discussed in detail in
Unit IV.
Under section 3(g) of FIFRA and
implementing regulations, EPA has
established a review program for
pesticides registered under FIFRA. The
goal of that program is for there to be a
periodic review of pesticide
registrations every 15 years to ensure
that the registrations satisfy FIFRA
standards and are based on ‘‘current
scientific and other knowledge
regarding the pesticide.’’ (40 CFR
155.40(a)). EPA is in the preliminary
stages of the registration review process
for organophosphate pesticides.
Although fenamiphos is not registered
under FIFRA, EPA will be reexamining
fenamiphos with the other registered
organophosphates because of the
organophosphates’ shared mechanism of
toxicity.
IV. Data Requirements
A. Required Data and Reports
Pursuant to FFDCA section 408(f),
EPA has determined that additional data
are reasonably required to support the
continuation of the import tolerances for
fenamiphos which are codified at 40
CFR 180.349. These data cannot be
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:28 Aug 30, 2011
Jkt 223001
obtained under FIFRA section 3(c)(2)(B)
because fenamiphos is not registered
under FIFRA, and the data call-in
authority under that section only
extends to registered pesticides. These
data cannot be obtained under TSCA
because pesticides are excluded from
coverage under that statute. 15 U.S.C.
2602(2)(B)(ii).
Accordingly, EPA proposes to issue a
final order requiring the submission of
the following data:
1. Comparative Cholinesterase Assay
(870.6300). A protocol and a final report
are required.
Rationale: As an organophosphate
pesticide (OP), inhibition of
acetylcholinesterase (AChE) is the
critical effect for use in human health
risk assessment. Many OPs were subject
to a Data Call-In for the developmental
neurotoxicity study (DNT). This Data
Call-In also included the requirement
for AChE inhibition data to evaluate
comparative sensitivity in juvenile and
adult rats. These data are most often
collected in a study called the
comparative cholinesterase assay (CCA).
Since that time, CCA studies for more
than 20 OPs have been submitted.
Although for some OPs no difference in
sensitivity has been observed in juvenile
and adult animals, for many of the OPs,
juveniles have been shown to be more
sensitive. At this time, OPP has
determined that a CCA is required for
fenamiphos to evaluate the potential for
increased sensitivity in juvenile animals
compared with that of adult animals.
Given that the AChE data provided in
the CCAs have provided more sensitive
results than DNT studies for the OPs, a
DNT study for fenamiphos is not
required at this time.
2. Immunotoxicity study (870.7800). A
final report and protocol are required.
Rationale: This is a new data
requirement under 40 CFR part 158 as
a part of the data requirements for
registration of a pesticide (food and nonfood uses) and for establishment of a
tolerance.
The Immunotoxicity Test Guideline
(OPPTS 870.7800) prescribes functional
immunotoxicity testing and is designed
to evaluate the potential of a repeated
chemical exposure to produce adverse
effects (i.e., suppression) on the immune
system. Immunosuppression is a deficit
in the ability of the immune system to
respond to a challenge of bacterial or
viral infections such as tuberculosis
(TB), Severe Acquired Respiratory
Syndrome (SARS), or neoplasia. An
immunotoxicity study for fenamiphos
has not been submitted.
3. Crop field trials—grapes
(860.1500). A final report is required.
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54187
Rationale: Field trials are required for
each commodity/commodity group
under 40 CFR part 158. These data are
used to establish the legal maximum
residue that may remain on food and to
assess the risk posed by the pesticide
residue. While residue data for
fenamiphos use on grape is adequate to
support several application methods,
the Agency has not received data to
support the current foliar use of
fenamiphos on grape in Mexico.
EPA guidelines recommend that crop
field trials be designed to take into
account where the crop is grown and
how much of the crop is grown. Field
trials are required for each type of
formulation because the formulation can
have a significant effect on the
magnitude of the pesticide residue left
on the crop. Residue trials also need to
represent the maximum application rate
on the label and have a geographic
distribution representative of the
commodity/commodity group. On June
1, 2000 (65 FR 35069) (FRL–6559–3),
EPA published in the Federal Register
a Notice which provided detailed
guidance on applying current U.S. data
requirements for the establishment or
continuance of tolerances for pesticide
residues in or on imported foods. A
copy of that Notice is available in the
docket of this proposed order. That
Notice contains instructions for
determining the number and location of
field trials.
B. Persons Who Commit To Submit the
Required Data
After the 60-day comment period
closes, the Agency will respond to
comments, if appropriate, and may issue
a final order requiring the submission of
various data for fenamiphos in the
Federal Register. If EPA issues such an
order, persons who are interested in the
continuation of the fenamiphos
tolerances must notify the Agency by
completing and submitting the required
‘‘Section 408(f) Order Response’’ form
(available in the docket) within 90 days
after publication of the final Order in
the Federal Register.
The ‘‘Section 408(f) Order Response
Form’’ requires the identification of
persons who will submit the required
data and lists the options available to
support the required data:
1. Develop new data.
2. Submit an existing study—submit
existing data not submitted previously
to the Agency by anyone.
3. Upgrade a study—submit or cite
data to upgrade a study classified by
EPA as partially acceptable and
upgradable.
4. Cite an existing study—cite an
existing study that EPA classified as
E:\FR\FM\31AUP1.SGM
31AUP1
54188
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 169 / Wednesday, August 31, 2011 / Proposed Rules
acceptable or an existing study that has
been submitted but not reviewed by the
Agency.
C. Required Dates for Submission of
Data/Reports
The following table lists the time
allocated for both the completion and
submission of each study. The required
submission date is calculated from the
date of publication in the Federal
Register of the final order.
Guideline requirement No.
Study title
Timeframe for protocol submission
870.6300 ...............................................
870.7800 ...............................................
860.1500 ...............................................
Comparative Cholinesterase Assay ....
Immunotoxicity Study ...........................
Crop Field Trials (grapes) ....................
6 months ..............................................
6 months ..............................................
Not Required ........................................
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
D. Failure To Submit
If the Agency does not receive a
Section 408(f) Response Form
identifying a person who agrees to
submit the required data within 90 days
after publication of the final order in the
Federal Register, EPA will proceed to
revoke the fenamiphos tolerances at 40
CFR 180.349. Such revocation order is
subject to the objection and hearing
procedures in FFDCA section 408(g)(2),
but the only material issue in such a
procedure is whether a submission
required by the order was made in a
timely fashion.
Additional events that may be the
basis for modification or revocation of
fenamiphos tolerances include, but are
not limited to, the following:
1. No person submits on the required
schedule an acceptable proposal or final
protocol when such is required to be
submitted to the Agency for review.
2. No person submits on the required
schedule an adequate progress report on
a study as required by the order.
3. No person submits on the required
schedule acceptable data as required by
the final order.
4. No person submits supportable
certifications as to the conditions of
submitted data, where required by order
and where no other cited or submitted
study meets the data requirements the
study was intended to fulfill.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
As required by statute, this proposal
to require submission of data in support
of tolerances is in the form of an order
and not a rule. (21 U.S.C. 346a(f)(1)(C)).
Under the Administrative Procedures
Act, orders are expressly excluded from
the definition of a rule. (5 U.S.C.
551(4)). Accordingly, the regulatory
assessment requirements imposed on
rulemaking do not, therefore, apply to
this action.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:28 Aug 30, 2011
Jkt 223001
Dated: August 22, 2011.
Peter Caulkins,
Acting Director, Pesticide Re-evaluation
Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2011–22127 Filed 8–30–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[MB Docket No. 11–137, RM–11637; DA 11–
1414]
Television Broadcasting Services;
Montgomery, AL
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Commission has before it
a petition for rulemaking filed by
Channel 32 Montgomery, LLC
(‘‘Channel 32’’), the licensee of
WNCF(TV), channel 32, Montgomery,
Alabama, requesting the substitution of
channel 31 for channel 32 at
Montgomery. Channel 32 believes
operating on channel 31 would offer
more meaningful replication of the
station’s former analog service area, and
would significantly increase the
geographic area within the station’s
protected contour.
DATES: Comments must be filed on or
before September 30, 2011, and reply
comments on or before October 17,
2011.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20554. In addition to filing comments
with the FCC, interested parties should
serve counsel for petitioner as follows:
Louis Wall, Channel 32 Montgomery,
LLC, 525 Blackburn Drive, Augusta,
Georgia 30907.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joyce L. Bernstein,
joyce.bernstein@fcc.gov, Media Bureau,
(202) 418–1647.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Timeframe for data
submission
12 months.
12 months.
24 months.
Proposed Rulemaking, MB Docket No.
11–100, adopted June 9, 2011, and
released June 10, 2011. The full text of
this document is available for public
inspection and copying during normal
business hours in the FCC’s Reference
Information Center at Portals II, CY–
A257, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554. This document
will also be available via ECFS (https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/). (Documents
will be available electronically in ASCII,
Word 97, and/or Adobe Acrobat.) This
document may be purchased from the
Commission’s duplicating contractor,
Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554, telephone
1–800–478–3160 or via e-mail https://
www.BCPIWEB.com. To request this
document in accessible formats
(computer diskettes, large print, audio
recording, and Braille), send an e-mail
to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432
(TTY). This document does not contain
proposed information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13. In addition, therefore, it does not
contain any proposed information
collection burden ‘‘for small business
concerns with fewer than 25
employees,’’ pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,
Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4).
Provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to
this proceeding. Members of the public
should note that from the time a Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking is issued until
the matter is no longer subject to
Commission consideration or court
review, all ex parte contacts (other than
ex parte presentations exempt under 47
CFR 1.1204(a)) are prohibited in
Commission proceedings, such as this
one, which involve channel allotments.
See 47 CFR 1.1208 for rules governing
restricted proceedings.
E:\FR\FM\31AUP1.SGM
31AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 169 (Wednesday, August 31, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 54185-54188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-22127]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0702; FRL-8886-2]
Fenamiphos; Proposed Data Call-In Order for Pesticide Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes to require the submission of various
data required to support the continuation of the tolerances for the
pesticide fenamiphos. Pesticide tolerances are established under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 31, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0702, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket Facility's normal hours of operation (8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2011-0702. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the docket without change and may be made available on-line at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-
mail. The regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available at https://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available either in the electronic
docket at https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard
copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac
Yard (South Bldg.),
[[Page 54186]]
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of operation of this
Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703)
305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Miederhoff, Pesticide Re-
evaluation Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (703) 347-8028; e-mail
address: miederhoff.eric@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. FFDCA Data Call-In Authority
In this document, EPA proposes to issue an order requiring the
submission of various data to support the continuation of the
fenamiphos tolerances at 40 CFR 180.349. Under section 408(f) of FFDCA,
21 U.S.C. 346a(f), EPA is authorized to require, by order, submission
of data ``reasonably required to support the continuation of a
tolerance'' when such data cannot be obtained under the Data Call-In
authority of section 3(c)(2)(B) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,
and Rodenticide Act (``FIFRA''), 7 U.S.C. 136a(c)(2)(B), or section 4
of the Toxic Substances Control Act (``TSCA''), 15 U.S.C. 2603. A
section 408(f) Data Call-In order may only be issued following notice
and a comment period of not less than 60 days.
A section 408(f) Data Call-In order must contain the following
elements:
A requirement that one or more persons submit to EPA a
notice identifying the person(s) who commit(s) to submit the data
required in the order;
A description of the required data and the required
reports connected to such data;
An explanation of why the required data could not be
obtained under section 3(c)(2)(B) of FIFRA or section 4 of TSCA; and
The required submission date for the notice identifying
one or more interested persons who commit to submit the required data
and the required submission dates for all the data and reports required
in the order. (21 U.S.C. 346a(f)(1)(C)).
EPA may by order modify or revoke the affected tolerances if any
one of the following submissions is not made in a timely manner:
A notice identifying the one or more interested persons
who commit to submit the data;
The data itself; or
The reports required under a section 408(f) order are not
submitted by the date specified in the order. (21 U.S.C. 346a(f)(2)).
III. Regulatory Background for Fenamiphos
Fenamiphos is an organophosphate nematicide/insecticide. It is not
currently registered under FIFRA. Fenamiphos' last FIFRA registration
was canceled in 2007. However, four FFDCA tolerances remain for
residues of fenamiphos on the following commodities: Pineapples,
grapes, raisins, and bananas (40 CFR 180.349). Since there are
currently no domestic registrations for fenamiphos, these tolerances
are referred to as ``import tolerances.''
Fenamiphos is a member of a family of pesticides known as the
organophosphates. EPA has concluded fenamiphos and other
organophosphate pesticides share a common mechanism of toxicity. As
with other organophosphates, the principal toxic effects induced by
fenamiphos are related to its cholinesterase-inhibiting activity. In
animal laboratory studies, it produces the associated clinical signs
such as tremors, unsteady gait, decreased activity, salivation, and
disturbed balance in rats and rabbits, and decreased cholinesterase
activity (plasma, brain) in rats and rabbits following acute,
subchronic, and chronic oral exposure.
In February 2002, EPA issued an Interim Reregistration Eligibility
Decision (IRED) for fenamiphos. The IRED evaluated the potential human
health and ecological risks associated with all registered uses of
fenamiphos. In connection with its obligation under the Food Quality
Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA), the Agency also evaluated whether all
fenamiphos tolerances in existence at the time of the passage of FQPA
met the revised safety standard that the FQPA adopted for FFDCA section
408. In the IRED, EPA concluded that the risks of fenamiphos when
evaluated in isolation from other organophosphates met the revised
safety standard in FFDCA section 408. This
[[Page 54187]]
conclusion was labeled ``interim,'' however, because EPA had not yet
completed a cumulative risk assessment for the organophosphates. In
July 2006, EPA completed its cumulative risk assessment for the
organophosphate pesticides finding that these tolerances met the
revised safety standard.
In June 2010, in response to a registrant's interest in supporting
tolerances for import purposes, the Agency completed a revised human
health risk assessment for fenamiphos. As there are no domestic
registrations for fenamiphos products, the assessment was limited to an
evaluation of the potential dietary risk from exposure to fenamiphos
residues in imported food commodities. This assessment utilized updated
risk assessment methodologies from those that were used for the IRED's
dietary assessment. The 2010 assessment concluded that potential
exposure to fenamiphos residues in or on imported food commodities
exceeds the Agency's level of concern.
The 2010 assessment identified several studies that were needed to
verify the accuracy of the assumptions used in the Agency's evaluation
of dietary exposure to imported commodities treated with fenamiphos or
that were needed to meet a new data requirement. The necessary data
include: A comparative chlolinesterase assay, residue data for grape,
and an immunotoxicity study. These data requirements are discussed in
detail in Unit IV.
Under section 3(g) of FIFRA and implementing regulations, EPA has
established a review program for pesticides registered under FIFRA. The
goal of that program is for there to be a periodic review of pesticide
registrations every 15 years to ensure that the registrations satisfy
FIFRA standards and are based on ``current scientific and other
knowledge regarding the pesticide.'' (40 CFR 155.40(a)). EPA is in the
preliminary stages of the registration review process for
organophosphate pesticides. Although fenamiphos is not registered under
FIFRA, EPA will be reexamining fenamiphos with the other registered
organophosphates because of the organophosphates' shared mechanism of
toxicity.
IV. Data Requirements
A. Required Data and Reports
Pursuant to FFDCA section 408(f), EPA has determined that
additional data are reasonably required to support the continuation of
the import tolerances for fenamiphos which are codified at 40 CFR
180.349. These data cannot be obtained under FIFRA section 3(c)(2)(B)
because fenamiphos is not registered under FIFRA, and the data call-in
authority under that section only extends to registered pesticides.
These data cannot be obtained under TSCA because pesticides are
excluded from coverage under that statute. 15 U.S.C. 2602(2)(B)(ii).
Accordingly, EPA proposes to issue a final order requiring the
submission of the following data:
1. Comparative Cholinesterase Assay (870.6300). A protocol and a
final report are required.
Rationale: As an organophosphate pesticide (OP), inhibition of
acetylcholinesterase (AChE) is the critical effect for use in human
health risk assessment. Many OPs were subject to a Data Call-In for the
developmental neurotoxicity study (DNT). This Data Call-In also
included the requirement for AChE inhibition data to evaluate
comparative sensitivity in juvenile and adult rats. These data are most
often collected in a study called the comparative cholinesterase assay
(CCA). Since that time, CCA studies for more than 20 OPs have been
submitted. Although for some OPs no difference in sensitivity has been
observed in juvenile and adult animals, for many of the OPs, juveniles
have been shown to be more sensitive. At this time, OPP has determined
that a CCA is required for fenamiphos to evaluate the potential for
increased sensitivity in juvenile animals compared with that of adult
animals. Given that the AChE data provided in the CCAs have provided
more sensitive results than DNT studies for the OPs, a DNT study for
fenamiphos is not required at this time.
2. Immunotoxicity study (870.7800). A final report and protocol are
required.
Rationale: This is a new data requirement under 40 CFR part 158 as
a part of the data requirements for registration of a pesticide (food
and non-food uses) and for establishment of a tolerance.
The Immunotoxicity Test Guideline (OPPTS 870.7800) prescribes
functional immunotoxicity testing and is designed to evaluate the
potential of a repeated chemical exposure to produce adverse effects
(i.e., suppression) on the immune system. Immunosuppression is a
deficit in the ability of the immune system to respond to a challenge
of bacterial or viral infections such as tuberculosis (TB), Severe
Acquired Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), or neoplasia. An immunotoxicity
study for fenamiphos has not been submitted.
3. Crop field trials--grapes (860.1500). A final report is
required.
Rationale: Field trials are required for each commodity/commodity
group under 40 CFR part 158. These data are used to establish the legal
maximum residue that may remain on food and to assess the risk posed by
the pesticide residue. While residue data for fenamiphos use on grape
is adequate to support several application methods, the Agency has not
received data to support the current foliar use of fenamiphos on grape
in Mexico.
EPA guidelines recommend that crop field trials be designed to take
into account where the crop is grown and how much of the crop is grown.
Field trials are required for each type of formulation because the
formulation can have a significant effect on the magnitude of the
pesticide residue left on the crop. Residue trials also need to
represent the maximum application rate on the label and have a
geographic distribution representative of the commodity/commodity
group. On June 1, 2000 (65 FR 35069) (FRL-6559-3), EPA published in the
Federal Register a Notice which provided detailed guidance on applying
current U.S. data requirements for the establishment or continuance of
tolerances for pesticide residues in or on imported foods. A copy of
that Notice is available in the docket of this proposed order. That
Notice contains instructions for determining the number and location of
field trials.
B. Persons Who Commit To Submit the Required Data
After the 60-day comment period closes, the Agency will respond to
comments, if appropriate, and may issue a final order requiring the
submission of various data for fenamiphos in the Federal Register. If
EPA issues such an order, persons who are interested in the
continuation of the fenamiphos tolerances must notify the Agency by
completing and submitting the required ``Section 408(f) Order
Response'' form (available in the docket) within 90 days after
publication of the final Order in the Federal Register.
The ``Section 408(f) Order Response Form'' requires the
identification of persons who will submit the required data and lists
the options available to support the required data:
1. Develop new data.
2. Submit an existing study--submit existing data not submitted
previously to the Agency by anyone.
3. Upgrade a study--submit or cite data to upgrade a study
classified by EPA as partially acceptable and upgradable.
4. Cite an existing study--cite an existing study that EPA
classified as
[[Page 54188]]
acceptable or an existing study that has been submitted but not
reviewed by the Agency.
C. Required Dates for Submission of Data/Reports
The following table lists the time allocated for both the
completion and submission of each study. The required submission date
is calculated from the date of publication in the Federal Register of
the final order.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timeframe for
Guideline requirement No. Study title protocol submission Timeframe for data submission
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
870.6300.......................... Comparative 6 months............. 12 months.
Cholinesterase Assay.
870.7800.......................... Immunotoxicity Study. 6 months............. 12 months.
860.1500.......................... Crop Field Trials Not Required......... 24 months.
(grapes).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Failure To Submit
If the Agency does not receive a Section 408(f) Response Form
identifying a person who agrees to submit the required data within 90
days after publication of the final order in the Federal Register, EPA
will proceed to revoke the fenamiphos tolerances at 40 CFR 180.349.
Such revocation order is subject to the objection and hearing
procedures in FFDCA section 408(g)(2), but the only material issue in
such a procedure is whether a submission required by the order was made
in a timely fashion.
Additional events that may be the basis for modification or
revocation of fenamiphos tolerances include, but are not limited to,
the following:
1. No person submits on the required schedule an acceptable
proposal or final protocol when such is required to be submitted to the
Agency for review.
2. No person submits on the required schedule an adequate progress
report on a study as required by the order.
3. No person submits on the required schedule acceptable data as
required by the final order.
4. No person submits supportable certifications as to the
conditions of submitted data, where required by order and where no
other cited or submitted study meets the data requirements the study
was intended to fulfill.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
As required by statute, this proposal to require submission of data
in support of tolerances is in the form of an order and not a rule. (21
U.S.C. 346a(f)(1)(C)). Under the Administrative Procedures Act, orders
are expressly excluded from the definition of a rule. (5 U.S.C.
551(4)). Accordingly, the regulatory assessment requirements imposed on
rulemaking do not, therefore, apply to this action.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: August 22, 2011.
Peter Caulkins,
Acting Director, Pesticide Re-evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2011-22127 Filed 8-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P