New Postal Product, 53983-53984 [2011-22131]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 168 / Tuesday, August 30, 2011 / Notices
Service Agreement with Foreign Postal
Operators 1 product. Notice at 2.
In support of its Notice, the Postal
Service filed two attachments as
follows:
• Attachment 1—an application for
non-public treatment of materials to
maintain redacted portions of the
agreement and supporting documents
under seal; and
• Attachment 2—a redacted copy of
the China Post 2011 Agreement.
China Post 2011 Agreement. The
Postal Service filed the instant contract
pursuant to 39 CFR 3010.40 et seq. The
Postal Service states that the proposed
inbound market dominant rates are
intended to become effective on October
1, 2011 after the rates that are currently
in effect under the China Post 2010
Agreement expires on September 30,
2011. Id. at 3. The China Post 2011
Agreement provides that it becomes
effective after all regulatory approvals
have been received, acceptance of
specific business rules by both parties,
notification to China Post, and mutual
agreement on an effective date. Id.
Attachment 2 at 2. The agreement
however, may be terminated by either
party no less than 30 days’ written
notice. Id. at 3. It states that public
notice of the rates is provided through
its filing at least 45 days before the
proposed effective date. Notice at 3. The
Postal Service and China Post Group,
the postal operator for China, are parties
to the agreement. The Postal Service
relates that the agreement covers
inbound Letter Post, in the form of
letters, flats, small packets, and bags,
and International Registered Mail
service for Letter Post along with an
ancillary service for delivery
confirmation scanning for Letter Post
small packets. Id. at 3–4.
Requirements under part 3010. The
Postal Service states that the China Post
2011 Agreement is expected to generate
financial performance improvements
including, e.g., delivery confirmation
service, barcodes for delivery
confirmation, sortations for routing, and
service updates. It contends that these
improvements should enhance mail
efficiency and other functions for Letter
Post items under the agreement. Id. at 5.
The Postal Service asserts that the
agreement should not cause
unreasonable harm in the marketplace
since it is unaware of any significant
competition in this market. Id. at 5–6.
Under 39 CFR 3010.43, the Postal
Service is required to submit a data
collection plan. The Postal Service
indicates that it intends to report
information on this agreement through
its Annual Compliance Report. While
indicating its willingness to provide
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:31 Aug 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
information on mailflows within the
annual compliance review process, the
Postal Service proposes that no special
data collection plan be established for
this agreement. With respect to
performance measurement, it requests
that the Commission exempt this
agreement from separate reporting
requirements under 39 CFR 3055.3 as
determined in Order Nos. 549 and 700
for the agreements in Docket Nos.
R2010–5, R2010–6, and R2011–4,
respectively. Id. at 7.
The Postal Service advances reasons
why the agreement is functionally
equivalent to the previously filed China
Post 2010 Agreement, TNT and
HongKong Post Agreements and
contains the same attributes and
methodology. Id. at 8–10. It asserts that
the instant agreement fits within the
Mail Classification Schedule language
for the Inbound Multi-Service
Agreements with the Foreign Postal
Operators 1 product. Additionally, it
states that the China Post 2011
Agreement includes similar terms and
conditions, e.g., is with a foreign postal
operator, conforms to a common
description, and relates to rates for
Letter Post tendered from the postal
operator’s territory with accompanying
ancillary services. Id. at 9.
The Postal Service identifies specific
terms that distinguish the instant
agreement from the three existing
agreements. These distinctions include
the term, purpose of the agreement,
effective date, confidentiality terms,
signatory, revision of product stream
rates, detailed air conveyance charges,
specifications for letters, related
updates, and other changes. Id. at 10–
12. The Postal Service contends that the
instant agreement is nonetheless
functionally equivalent to existing
agreements and ‘‘[t]he Postal Service
does not consider that the specified
differences affect either the fundamental
service the Postal Service is offering or
the fundamental structure of the
contracts.’’ Id. at 12.
In its Notice, the Postal Service
maintains that certain portions of the
agreement, prices, and related financial
information should remain under seal.
Id. at 12; id. Attachment 1.
The Postal Service concludes that the
China Post 2011 Agreement should be
added as a functionally equivalent
agreement under the Inbound Market
Dominant Multi-Service Agreements
with Foreign Postal Operators 1
product. Id. at 13.
II. Notice of Filing
Interested persons may submit
comments on whether the Postal
Service’s filing in the captioned docket
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53983
is consistent with the policies of 39
U.S.C. 3622 and 39 CFR part 3010.40.
Comments are due no later than August
30, 2011.3 The public portions of these
filings can be accessed via the
Commission’s Web site (https://
www.prc.gov).
The Commission appoints James F.
Callow to serve as Public Representative
in this docket.
III. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
No. R2011–7 to consider matters raised
by the Postal Service’s Notice.
2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, James F.
Callow is appointed to serve as officer
of the Commission (Public
Representative) to represent the
interests of the general public in this
proceeding.
3. Comments by interested persons in
this proceeding are due no later than
August 30, 2011.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–22057 Filed 8–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. CP2011–69; Order No. 822]
New Postal Product
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is noticing a
recently-filed Postal Service request to
enter into an additional agreement
(referred to as Norway Post Agreement)
under the ‘‘Inbound Competitive MultiService Agreements with Foreign Postal
Operators 1’’ product offering. This
document invites public comments on
the request and addresses several
related procedural steps.
DATES: Comments are due: August 31,
2011.
SUMMARY:
Submit comments
electronically by accessing the ‘‘Filing
Online’’ link in the banner at the top of
the Commission’s Web site (https://
www.prc.gov) or by directly accessing
the Commission’s Filing Online system
ADDRESSES:
3 To provide interested persons sufficient time to
comment in these proceedings, the Commission
finds it appropriate to waive the 10-day comment
period specified in 39 CFR 3010.44(a)(5). The
modest extension will not prejudice either party to
the agreement given the 45 days’ advance notice
required for Type 2 rate adjustments.
E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM
30AUN1
53984
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 168 / Tuesday, August 30, 2011 / Notices
at https://www.prc.gov/prc-pages/filingonline/login.aspx. Commenters who
cannot submit their views electronically
should contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section as the source for case-related
information for advice on alternatives to
electronic filing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
at 202–789–6820 (case-related
information) or DocketAdmins@prc.gov
(electronic filing assistance).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Introduction
II. Notice of Filing
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On August 18, 2011, the Postal
Service filed a notice, pursuant to 39
CFR 3015.5, that it has entered into an
additional Inbound Competitive MultiService Agreements with Foreign Postal
Operators 1 agreement.1 The Notice
concerns a bilateral agreement for
inbound competitive services with
Posten Norge AS (Norway Post
Agreement) that the Postal Service seeks
to add to the Inbound Competitive
Multi-Service Agreement with Foreign
Postal Operators 1 product.
In Order No. 546, the Commission
approved the Inbound Competitive
Multi-Service Agreement with Foreign
Postal Operators 1 product and a
functionally equivalent agreement,
Koninklijke TNT Post BV and TNT Post
Pakketservice Benelux BV (TNT
Agreement). The Postal Service asserts
that its filing demonstrates that the
Norway Post Agreement fits within the
Mail Classification Schedule (MCS)
language in Governors’ Decision No. 10–
3 originally filed in Docket Nos.
MC2010–34 and CP2010–95. Notice at
2.
In support of its Notice, the Postal
Service filed four attachments as
follows:
• Attachment 1—an application for
non-public treatment of materials to
maintain redacted portions of the
agreement and supporting documents
under seal;
• Attachment 2—a redacted copy of
Governors’ Decision No. 10–3 that
establishes prices and classifications for
Inbound Competitive Multi-Service
Agreements with Foreign Postal
Operators agreements, proposed MCS
1 Notice
of United States Postal Service of Filing
Additional Functionally Equivalent Agreement,
August 18, 2011 (Notice); see also Docket Nos.
MC2010–34 and CP2010–95, Order Adding
Inbound Competitive Multi-Service Agreements
with Foreign Postal Operators 1 to the Competitive
Product List and Approving Included Agreement,
September 29, 2010 (Order No. 546).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:31 Aug 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
language, formulas for prices,
certification of the Governors’ vote and
certification of compliance with 39
U.S.C. 3633(a);
• Attachment 3—a redacted copy of
the Norway Post Agreement; and
• Attachment 4—a certified statement
required by 39 CFR 3015.5(c)(2).
Norway Post Agreement. The Postal
Service filed the instant contract
pursuant to 39 CFR 3015.5 and in
accordance with Order No. 546. The
Postal Service states that the inbound
air parcel post competitive services in
the Norway Post Agreement conform to
the proposed MCS language for Inbound
Multi-Service Agreements with Foreign
Postal Operators 1. The Postal Service
states it will notify the mailer of the
effective date within 30 days after all
necessary regulatory approvals have
been received. Id. The agreement
provides that the parties will mutually
agree on the effective date. Id. at 3;
Attachment 3 at 1. The parties intend
for the agreement to become effective on
October 1, 2011, and to remain in effect
for 1 year with the option for renewal
for another year. Id. at 2; Attachment 3
at 1.
Functional equivalence. The Postal
Service asserts that the Norway Post
Agreement and the TNT Agreement
incorporate the same cost and market
characteristics. Notice at 3. It states that
the TNT Agreement includes similar
terms and conditions, e.g., is an
agreement with a foreign postal operator
and conforms to a common description.
Id. Additionally, the Postal Service
contends that the Norway Post
Agreement is similar in cost
characteristics with the TNT Agreement
other than certain minor adjustments,
such as expression of costs in different
currencies, which are slight
modifications that do not affect the
agreement’s functional equivalence. Id.
It maintains that because of the limited
changes, the cost characteristics are
essentially the same as the TNT
Agreement.2
The Postal Service identifies specific
terms that distinguish the instant
agreement from the existing agreement.
These distinctions include the term,
products, services, applicable law and
dispute resolution methods. Id. at 3–4.
Despite some minor differences, the
Postal Service asserts that the Norway
Post Agreement is functionally
equivalent to the TNT Agreement
previously filed. Id. at 4.
In its Notice, the Postal Service
maintains that certain portions of the
agreement, prices, and related financial
2 The Postal Service’s Notice refers to the TNT
Agreement as the ‘‘baseline agreement.’’ Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
information should remain under seal.
Id. at 2; Attachment 1.
The Postal Service concludes that the
Norway Post Agreement complies with
39 U.S.C. 3633 and is functionally
equivalent to the TNT Agreement.
Notice at 4. Therefore, it requests that
the Commission add the Norway Post
Agreement to the Inbound Competitive
Multi-Service Agreement with Foreign
Postal Operators 1 product. Id.
II. Notice of Filing
The Commission establishes Docket
No. CP2011–69 for consideration of
matters raised by the Postal Service’s
Notice.
The Commission appoints James F.
Callow to serve as Public Representative
in this docket.
Comments. Interested persons may
submit comments on whether the Postal
Service’s filings in the captioned docket
are consistent with the policies of 39
U.S.C. 3632, 3633 or 39 CFR part 3015.
Comments are due no later than August
31, 2011. The public portions of this
filing can be accessed via the
Commission’s Web site (https://
www.prc.gov).
III. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
No. CP2011–69 for consideration of the
matters raised in this docket.
2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, James F.
Callow is appointed to serve as officer
of the Commission (Public
Representative) to represent the
interests of the general public in this
proceeding.
3. Comments by interested persons in
this proceeding are due no later than
August 31, 2011.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–22131 Filed 8–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. A2011–50; Order No. 820]
Post Office Closing
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This document informs the
public that an appeal of the closing of
the Prairie Hill, Texas post office has
been filed. It identifies preliminary
steps and provides a procedural
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM
30AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 168 (Tuesday, August 30, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53983-53984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-22131]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. CP2011-69; Order No. 822]
New Postal Product
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a recently-filed Postal Service
request to enter into an additional agreement (referred to as Norway
Post Agreement) under the ``Inbound Competitive Multi-Service
Agreements with Foreign Postal Operators 1'' product offering. This
document invites public comments on the request and addresses several
related procedural steps.
DATES: Comments are due: August 31, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically by accessing the ``Filing
Online'' link in the banner at the top of the Commission's Web site
(https://www.prc.gov) or by directly accessing the Commission's Filing
Online system
[[Page 53984]]
at https://www.prc.gov/prc-pages/filing-online/login.aspx. Commenters
who cannot submit their views electronically should contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section as the source
for case-related information for advice on alternatives to electronic
filing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
at 202-789-6820 (case-related information) or DocketAdmins@prc.gov
(electronic filing assistance).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
II. Notice of Filing
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On August 18, 2011, the Postal Service filed a notice, pursuant to
39 CFR 3015.5, that it has entered into an additional Inbound
Competitive Multi-Service Agreements with Foreign Postal Operators 1
agreement.\1\ The Notice concerns a bilateral agreement for inbound
competitive services with Posten Norge AS (Norway Post Agreement) that
the Postal Service seeks to add to the Inbound Competitive Multi-
Service Agreement with Foreign Postal Operators 1 product.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Notice of United States Postal Service of Filing Additional
Functionally Equivalent Agreement, August 18, 2011 (Notice); see
also Docket Nos. MC2010-34 and CP2010-95, Order Adding Inbound
Competitive Multi-Service Agreements with Foreign Postal Operators 1
to the Competitive Product List and Approving Included Agreement,
September 29, 2010 (Order No. 546).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In Order No. 546, the Commission approved the Inbound Competitive
Multi-Service Agreement with Foreign Postal Operators 1 product and a
functionally equivalent agreement, Koninklijke TNT Post BV and TNT Post
Pakketservice Benelux BV (TNT Agreement). The Postal Service asserts
that its filing demonstrates that the Norway Post Agreement fits within
the Mail Classification Schedule (MCS) language in Governors' Decision
No. 10-3 originally filed in Docket Nos. MC2010-34 and CP2010-95.
Notice at 2.
In support of its Notice, the Postal Service filed four attachments
as follows:
Attachment 1--an application for non-public treatment of
materials to maintain redacted portions of the agreement and supporting
documents under seal;
Attachment 2--a redacted copy of Governors' Decision No.
10-3 that establishes prices and classifications for Inbound
Competitive Multi-Service Agreements with Foreign Postal Operators
agreements, proposed MCS language, formulas for prices, certification
of the Governors' vote and certification of compliance with 39 U.S.C.
3633(a);
Attachment 3--a redacted copy of the Norway Post
Agreement; and
Attachment 4--a certified statement required by 39 CFR
3015.5(c)(2).
Norway Post Agreement. The Postal Service filed the instant
contract pursuant to 39 CFR 3015.5 and in accordance with Order No.
546. The Postal Service states that the inbound air parcel post
competitive services in the Norway Post Agreement conform to the
proposed MCS language for Inbound Multi-Service Agreements with Foreign
Postal Operators 1. The Postal Service states it will notify the mailer
of the effective date within 30 days after all necessary regulatory
approvals have been received. Id. The agreement provides that the
parties will mutually agree on the effective date. Id. at 3; Attachment
3 at 1. The parties intend for the agreement to become effective on
October 1, 2011, and to remain in effect for 1 year with the option for
renewal for another year. Id. at 2; Attachment 3 at 1.
Functional equivalence. The Postal Service asserts that the Norway
Post Agreement and the TNT Agreement incorporate the same cost and
market characteristics. Notice at 3. It states that the TNT Agreement
includes similar terms and conditions, e.g., is an agreement with a
foreign postal operator and conforms to a common description. Id.
Additionally, the Postal Service contends that the Norway Post
Agreement is similar in cost characteristics with the TNT Agreement
other than certain minor adjustments, such as expression of costs in
different currencies, which are slight modifications that do not affect
the agreement's functional equivalence. Id. It maintains that because
of the limited changes, the cost characteristics are essentially the
same as the TNT Agreement.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Postal Service's Notice refers to the TNT Agreement as
the ``baseline agreement.'' Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Postal Service identifies specific terms that distinguish the
instant agreement from the existing agreement. These distinctions
include the term, products, services, applicable law and dispute
resolution methods. Id. at 3-4.
Despite some minor differences, the Postal Service asserts that the
Norway Post Agreement is functionally equivalent to the TNT Agreement
previously filed. Id. at 4.
In its Notice, the Postal Service maintains that certain portions
of the agreement, prices, and related financial information should
remain under seal. Id. at 2; Attachment 1.
The Postal Service concludes that the Norway Post Agreement
complies with 39 U.S.C. 3633 and is functionally equivalent to the TNT
Agreement. Notice at 4. Therefore, it requests that the Commission add
the Norway Post Agreement to the Inbound Competitive Multi-Service
Agreement with Foreign Postal Operators 1 product. Id.
II. Notice of Filing
The Commission establishes Docket No. CP2011-69 for consideration
of matters raised by the Postal Service's Notice.
The Commission appoints James F. Callow to serve as Public
Representative in this docket.
Comments. Interested persons may submit comments on whether the
Postal Service's filings in the captioned docket are consistent with
the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633 or 39 CFR part 3015. Comments are
due no later than August 31, 2011. The public portions of this filing
can be accessed via the Commission's Web site (https://www.prc.gov).
III. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket No. CP2011-69 for
consideration of the matters raised in this docket.
2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, James F. Callow is appointed to serve
as officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to represent the
interests of the general public in this proceeding.
3. Comments by interested persons in this proceeding are due no
later than August 31, 2011.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the
Federal Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-22131 Filed 8-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE