Fee for Using a Priority Review Voucher in Fiscal Year 2012, 53910-53912 [2011-22062]
Download as PDF
53910
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 168 / Tuesday, August 30, 2011 / Notices
Because of this, the Agency conducted
internal research on tablet splitting and
concluded that in some cases, there are
possible safety issues, especially when
tablets are not scored or evaluated for
splitting. The Agency’s concerns with
splitting a tablet included variations in
the tablet content, weight,
disintegration, or dissolution, which can
affect how much drug is present in a
split tablet and available for absorption.
In addition, there may be stability issues
with splitting tablets.
Tablet splitting also is addressed in
pharmacopeial standards. The European
Pharmacopeia currently applies
accuracy of subdivision standards for
scored tablets—and has at various times
also included standards for content
uniformity, weight variation, and loss of
mass—while the United States
Pharmacopeia published a Stimuli
article in 2009 proposing criteria for loss
of mass and accuracy of subdivision for
split tablets.1
As an outgrowth of these discussions
and developments, FDA is providing
recommendations for application
content regarding the scientific basis for
functional scores on solid oral dosage
form products to ensure the quality of
both NDA and ANDA scored tablet
products. To accomplish this, the
Agency has developed consistent and
meaningful criteria by which scored
tablets can be evaluated and labeled.
The criteria are as follows: (1) Provide
a harmonized approach to chemistry,
manufacturing, and controls reviews of
scored tablets; (2) ensure consistency in
nomenclature (e.g., score versus bisect)
and labeling; and (3) provide
information through product labeling or
other means to healthcare providers.
This draft guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The draft guidance, when finalized, will
represent the Agency’s current thinking
on tablet scoring: nomenclature,
labeling, and data for evaluation. It does
not create or confer any rights for or on
any person and does not operate to bind
FDA or the public. An alternative
approach may be used if such approach
satisfies the requirements of the
applicable statutes and regulations.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written
comments regarding this document. It is
only necessary to send one set of
1 Geoff Green et al., November-December 2009,
35(6), ‘‘Pharmacopeial Standards for the
Subdivision Characteristics of Scored Tablets,’’
Pharmacopeial Forum.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:31 Aug 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
comments. It is no longer necessary to
send two copies of mailed comments.
Identify comments with the docket
number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
III. The Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995
This draft guidance refers to
previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations.
These collections of information are
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The collections
of information in 21 CFR 201.57, 314.50,
and 314.70 have been approved under
OMB control numbers 0910–0572 (for
section 201.57) and 0910–0001 (for part
314).
IV. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the document at either
https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/Guidance
ComplianceRegulatoryInformation/
Guidances/default.htm or https://
www.regulations.gov.
Dated: August 25, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011–22146 Filed 8–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0594]
Fee for Using a Priority Review
Voucher in Fiscal Year 2012
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
fee rates for using a tropical disease
priority review voucher for fiscal year
(FY) 2012. The Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act), as
amended by the Food and Drug
Administration Amendments Act of
2007 (FDAAA), authorizes FDA to
determine and collect priority review
user fees for certain applications for
approval of drug or biological products
when those applications use a priority
review voucher awarded by the
Secretary of Health and Human
Services. These vouchers are awarded to
the sponsors of certain tropical disease
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
product applications, submitted after
September 27, 2007, upon FDA
approval of such applications. The
amount of the fee to be submitted to
FDA with applications using a priority
review voucher is determined each FY
based on the average cost incurred by
FDA in the review of a human drug
application subject to priority review in
the previous FY. This notice establishes
the priority review fee rate for FY 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Miller, Office of Financial
Management (HFA–100), Food and Drug
Administration, 1350 Picard Dr.,
Rockville, MD 20850, 301–796–7103.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 1102 (under title XI) of
FDAAA (Pub. L. 110–85) added new
section 524 to the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360n). In section 524, Congress
encouraged development of new drug
and biological products for prevention
and treatment of certain tropical
diseases by offering additional
incentives for obtaining FDA approval
of such products. Under section 524, the
sponsor of an eligible human drug
application submitted after September
27, 2007, for a qualified tropical disease
(as defined in section 524(a)(3)), shall
receive a priority review voucher upon
approval of the tropical disease product
application. The recipient of a priority
review voucher may either use the
voucher with a future submission to
FDA under section 505(b)(1) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 355(b)(1)) or
section 351 of the Public Health Service
Act (21 U.S.C. 262), or transfer
(including by sale) the voucher to
another party that may then use it. A
priority review is a review conducted
with a Prescription Drug User Fee Act
(PDUFA) goal date of 6 months.
The applicant that uses a priority
review voucher is entitled to a priority
review but must pay FDA a priority
review user fee in addition to any other
fee required by PDUFA. FDA has
published a draft guidance on its Web
site about how this priority review
voucher program will operate (available
at: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/
Drugs/GuidanceCompliance
RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/
ucm080599.pdf).
This notice establishes the priority
review fee rate for FY 2012 of
$5,280,000 and outlines FDA’s process
for implementing the collection of the
priority review user fees. This rate is
effective on October 1, 2011, and will
remain in effect through September 30,
2012, for applications submitted with a
priority review voucher. The payment of
E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM
30AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 168 / Tuesday, August 30, 2011 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
this priority review user fee is required
in addition to the payment of any other
fee that would normally apply to such
an application under PDUFA before
FDA will consider the application
complete and acceptable for filing.
II. Priority Review User Fee for FY
2012
Under section 524(c)(2) of the FD&C
Act, the amount of the priority review
user fee is to be determined each FY
based on the average cost incurred by
FDA in the review of a human drug
application subject to priority review in
the previous FY.
A priority review is a review
conducted with a PDUFA goal date of 6
months. Normally, an application for a
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
(CDER) product will qualify for a
priority review if FDA determines that
the product, if approved, would provide
safe and effective therapy where no
satisfactory alternative therapy exists or
would be a significant improvement
compared to marketed products,
including non-drug products and/or
therapies, in the treatment, diagnosis, or
prevention of a disease. A Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research
(CBER) product will qualify for a
priority review if FDA determines that
the product, if approved, would be a
significant improvement in the safety or
effectiveness of the treatment, diagnosis,
or prevention of a serious or lifethreatening disease. FDA has committed
to a goal to review and act on 90 percent
of the applications that have been
granted priority review status no later
than 6 months after receipt. An
application that does not receive a
priority designation will receive a
standard review. Under the goals
identified in the letters referenced in
section 101(c) of FDAAA, FDA commits
to a goal to review and act on 90 percent
of standard applications within 10
months of the date of receipt. A priority
review involves a more intensive level
of effort and a higher level of resources
than a standard review.
Section 524 of the FD&C Act specifies
that the fee amount should be based on
the average cost incurred by the Agency
for a priority review in the previous FY.
Because FDA has never tracked the cost
of reviewing applications that get
priority review as a separate cost subset,
FDA estimated this cost based on other
data that the Agency has tracked and
kept. FDA started by using data that the
Agency estimates and publishes on its
Web site each year—standard costs for
review. FDA does not publish a
standard cost for ‘‘the review of a
human drug application subject to
priority review in the previous fiscal
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:31 Aug 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
year.’’ However, we expect all such
applications would contain clinical
data. The standard cost application
categories with clinical data that FDA
does publish each year are: (1) New
drug applications (NDAs) for a new
molecular entity (NME) with clinical
data, and (2) biologic license
applications (BLAs).
The worksheets for standard costs for
FY 2010, the latest year for which
standard cost data are available, show a
standard cost of $4,316,567 for an NDA
with clinical data and $6,081,461 for a
BLA. Based on these standard costs, the
total cost to review the 33 applications
in these two categories in FY 2010 (9
BLAs and 24 NDAs with clinical data)
was $158,331,000, rounded to the
nearest thousand dollars. (Note: No
investigational new drug (IND) review
costs are included in this amount; they
will be calculated separately and added
in the next paragraph.) Records acquired
from CDER and CBER by the Office of
Policy and Planning (OPP), Economics
Staff, indicate that a total of 13 of these
applications (8 NDAs [excluding the
President’s Emergency Plan for Aids
Relief NDAs] and 5 BLAs) received
priority review, which would mean that
the remaining 20 received standard
reviews. Because a priority review
compresses a review that ordinarily
takes 10 months into 6 months, OPP
estimates that a multiplier of 1.67 (10
months divided by 6 months) should be
applied to non-priority review costs in
estimating the effort and cost of a
priority review as compared to a
standard review. This multiplier is
consistent with published research on
this subject. In the article ‘‘Developing
Drugs for Developing Countries,’’
published in Health Affairs, Volume 25,
Number 2, in 2006, the analysis by
David B. Ridley, Henry G. Grabowski,
and Jeffrey L. Moe supports a priority
review multiplier in the range of 1.48 to
2.35. The multiplier derived by FDA
falls well below the mid-point of this
range. Using FY 2010 figures, the costs
of a priority and standard review are
estimated using the following formula:
(13 a * 1.67) + (20 a) = $158,331,000
where ‘‘a’’ is the cost of a standard
review and ‘‘a times 1.67’’ is the cost of
a priority review. Using this formula,
the cost of a standard review for NMEs
is calculated to be $3,796,000 (rounded
to the nearest thousand dollars) and the
cost of a priority review for NMEs is
1.67 times that amount, or $6,339,000
(rounded to the nearest thousand
dollars).
Next, the cost of the IND review phase
for these applications is calculated. The
standard lifetime cost of reviewing a
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53911
drug IND in FY 2010 was $362,102. The
standard lifetime cost of a biologic IND
review in FY 2010 was $791,916.
Because there were 8 priority NDAs and
5 priority BLAs received in FY 2010, the
following formula below estimates the
average cost of the IND review phase of
an application:
(8 NDA * $362,102) + (5 BLAs *
$791,916) = $6,856,396
This is the full cost of the IND review
associated with the 13 priority review
applications received in FY 2010.
Dividing $6,856,000 (rounded to the
nearest thousand dollars) by 13 (the
total number of priority review
applications received in FY 2010),
yields an average IND review phase cost
of $527,000 (rounded to the nearest
thousand dollars) per priority review
application.
Adding the cost of the NDA/BLA
priority review calculated above,
$6,339,000, to the cost of the IND review
phase of $527,000, results in an
estimated average cost for priority
review for an application received in FY
2010 of $6,866,000.
Section 524 of the FD&C Act specifies
that the fee amount should be based on
the average cost incurred by the Agency
for a priority review in the previous FY.
FDA is setting fees for FY 2012, and the
previous FY is FY 2011. However, the
FY 2011 submission cohort has not been
closed out yet, and the cost data for FY
2011 are not complete. The latest year
for which FDA has data is FY 2010.
Accordingly FDA will adjust the FY
2010 cost figure above by the average
amount by which FDA’s average salary
and benefit costs increased in the 5
years prior to FY 2011, to adjust the FY
2010 amount for cost increases in FY
2011. That figure, also published in the
Federal Register of August 1, 2011 (76
FR 45831), setting PDUFA fees for FY
2012, is 3.72 percent. Increasing the FY
2010 average priority review cost figure
of $6,866,000 by 3.72 percent results in
an estimated cost of $7,121,000
(rounded to the nearest thousand
dollars).
FDA will deduct from this amount the
PDUFA fee that must also be paid (in
addition to the priority review fee)
when an NDA or BLA with clinical data
is submitted in FY 2012. That amount,
also published in the Federal Register
of August 1, 2011, is $1,841,500. The
difference, rounded to the nearest
thousand dollars, is $5,280,000. This is
the priority review user fee amount for
FY 2012 that must be submitted with a
priority review voucher in FY 2012, in
addition to any PDUFA fee that is
required for such an application.
E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM
30AUN1
53912
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 168 / Tuesday, August 30, 2011 / Notices
III. Priority Review Fee Schedule for
FY 2012
The fee rate for FY 2012 is set out in
table 1 of this document:
TABLE 1—PRIORITY REVIEW
SCHEDULE FOR FY 2012
Fee category
Fee rate for
FY 2012
Applications Submitted With a
Priority Review Voucher in
Addition to the Normal
PDUFA Fee ...........................
$5,280,000
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
IV. Implementation of Priority Review
Fee
Under section 524(c)(4)(A) of the
FD&C Act, the priority review user fee
is due upon submission of the
application for which the priority
review voucher is used. Section
524(c)(4)(B) specifies that the
application will be considered
incomplete if the priority review user
fee and all other applicable user fees are
not paid in accordance with FDA
payment procedures. FDA may not grant
a waiver, exemption, reduction, or
refund of any fees due and payable
under this section of the FD&C Act, and
FDA may not collect priority review
voucher fees prior to a relevant
appropriation for fees for that FY.
Beginning with FDA’s appropriation for
FY 2009, the annual appropriation
language states specifically that
‘‘priority review user fees authorized by
21 U.S.C. 360n (section 524 of the FD&C
Act) may be credited to this account, to
remain available until expended.’’ (Pub.
L. 111–8, Section 5, Division A, Title
VI).
The priority review fee established in
the new fee schedule must be paid for
any application that is received after
September 30, 2011, and submitted with
a priority review voucher. This fee must
be paid in addition to any other fee due
under PDUFA. Payment must be made
in U.S. currency by check, bank draft, or
U.S. postal money order payable to the
order of the Food and Drug
Administration. The user fee
identification (ID) number should be
included on the check, followed by the
words ‘‘Priority Review.’’ Payments can
be mailed to: Food and Drug
Administration, P.O. Box 979107, St.
Louis, MO 63197–9000.
If checks are sent by a courier that
requests a street address, the courier can
deliver the checks to: U.S. Bank,
Attention: Government Lockbox 979107,
1005 Convention Plaza, St. Louis, MO
63101. (Note: This U.S. Bank address is
for courier delivery only.) The FDA post
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:31 Aug 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
office box number (P.O. Box 979107)
must be written on the check. The tax
identification number of the Food and
Drug Administration is 53–0196965.
Wire transfer payments may also be
used. Please reference your unique user
fee ID number when completing your
transfer. The originating financial
institution may charge a wire transfer
fee. Please ask your financial institution
about the fee and include it with your
payment to ensure that your fee is fully
paid. The account information is as
follows: New York Federal Reserve
Bank, U.S. Dept. of Treasury, TREAS
NYC, 33 Liberty St., New York, NY
10045, Acct. No.: 75060099, Routing
No.: 021030004, Swift: FRNYUS33,
Beneficiary: FDA, 1350 Piccard Dr.,
Rockville, MD 20850.
Dated: August 24, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011–22062 Filed 8–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0607]
FDA’s Public Database of Products
With Orphan-Drug Designation:
Replacing Non-Informative Code
Names With Descriptive Identifiers
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), Office of Orphan
Products Development, is announcing
that it has replaced non-informative
code names with descriptive identifiers
on its public database of products that
have received orphan-drug designation.
The Orphan Drug Act mandates that
FDA provide notice to the public
respecting the designation of a drug as
an orphan-drug. FDA typically provides
public notice by publishing a drug’s
generic or trade name upon orphan
designation. Where a designated drug
does not have a generic or trade name,
publishing a non-informative code name
does not meet the statutory disclosure
requirement because the public would
not be able to identify the drug that has
received orphan designation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Fritsch, Office of Orphan
Products Development, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 32, rm. 5276, Silver Spring,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
MD 20993, 301–796–8660, e-mail:
OPDAR@FDA.HHS.GOV.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA
publishes the generic name and/or trade
name of a drug on its Web site at https://
www.fda.gov/orphan after it designates
a drug as an orphan drug. It has come
to our attention that a small subset of
drugs that have received orphan
designation were published on our
public database with non-informative
code names. After careful consideration
of this matter, we have concluded that
the Orphan Drug Act mandates that
FDA identify to the public products that
have received orphan-drug designation.
If a drug has no generic or trade name,
publishing a non-informative code name
for that drug does not meet the statutory
notice requirement because the public
would not be able to identify the drug
that has received orphan designation.
In addition to issuing this notice, FDA
has mailed letters to affected sponsors at
their last known address and has posted
notification on its Web site at https://
www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/Developing
ProductsforRareDiseasesConditions/
HowtoapplyforOrphanProduct
Designation/ucm267378.htm. We
informed sponsors that, on our Web site,
we have replaced all non-informative
code names with descriptive identifiers.
We asked that these sponsors notify us
within 20 days of the date of the letter
if they believe that their product’s
current identifier did not accurately
identify their product to the public.
Despite reasonable efforts, we were
unable to notify a small proportion of
affected sponsors. It appears that some
sponsors may have gone out of business
or may have transferred ownership of,
or beneficial interest in, orphan-drug
designation without informing FDA.
(We remind sponsors of their
obligations to notify us of any change in
ownership of orphan-drug designation,
under 21 CFR 316.27, and to submit
brief progress reports to us on an annual
basis, under 21 CFR 316.30.)
Through this document, FDA seeks to
inform sponsors whom the Agency has
not otherwise been able to notify that,
under the Orphan Drug Act’s notice
requirements, all non-informative codes
in our public orphan drug designations
database have been replaced with
corresponding informative identifiers.
If you believe this notice applies to
you, please visit our Web site at
https://www.fda.gov/orphan. Under
‘‘Resources for You,’’ click on the
‘‘Search for Orphan Drug Designations
and Approvals’’ and enter your product.
If you believe that your product’s
current identifier does not accurately
identify your product to the public,
E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM
30AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 168 (Tuesday, August 30, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53910-53912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-22062]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0594]
Fee for Using a Priority Review Voucher in Fiscal Year 2012
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the fee
rates for using a tropical disease priority review voucher for fiscal
year (FY) 2012. The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C
Act), as amended by the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of
2007 (FDAAA), authorizes FDA to determine and collect priority review
user fees for certain applications for approval of drug or biological
products when those applications use a priority review voucher awarded
by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. These vouchers are
awarded to the sponsors of certain tropical disease product
applications, submitted after September 27, 2007, upon FDA approval of
such applications. The amount of the fee to be submitted to FDA with
applications using a priority review voucher is determined each FY
based on the average cost incurred by FDA in the review of a human drug
application subject to priority review in the previous FY. This notice
establishes the priority review fee rate for FY 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Miller, Office of Financial
Management (HFA-100), Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Picard Dr.,
Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-7103.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 1102 (under title XI) of FDAAA (Pub. L. 110-85) added new
section 524 to the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360n). In section 524, Congress
encouraged development of new drug and biological products for
prevention and treatment of certain tropical diseases by offering
additional incentives for obtaining FDA approval of such products.
Under section 524, the sponsor of an eligible human drug application
submitted after September 27, 2007, for a qualified tropical disease
(as defined in section 524(a)(3)), shall receive a priority review
voucher upon approval of the tropical disease product application. The
recipient of a priority review voucher may either use the voucher with
a future submission to FDA under section 505(b)(1) of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 355(b)(1)) or section 351 of the Public Health Service Act (21
U.S.C. 262), or transfer (including by sale) the voucher to another
party that may then use it. A priority review is a review conducted
with a Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) goal date of 6 months.
The applicant that uses a priority review voucher is entitled to a
priority review but must pay FDA a priority review user fee in addition
to any other fee required by PDUFA. FDA has published a draft guidance
on its Web site about how this priority review voucher program will
operate (available at: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm080599.pdf).
This notice establishes the priority review fee rate for FY 2012 of
$5,280,000 and outlines FDA's process for implementing the collection
of the priority review user fees. This rate is effective on October 1,
2011, and will remain in effect through September 30, 2012, for
applications submitted with a priority review voucher. The payment of
[[Page 53911]]
this priority review user fee is required in addition to the payment of
any other fee that would normally apply to such an application under
PDUFA before FDA will consider the application complete and acceptable
for filing.
II. Priority Review User Fee for FY 2012
Under section 524(c)(2) of the FD&C Act, the amount of the priority
review user fee is to be determined each FY based on the average cost
incurred by FDA in the review of a human drug application subject to
priority review in the previous FY.
A priority review is a review conducted with a PDUFA goal date of 6
months. Normally, an application for a Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research (CDER) product will qualify for a priority review if FDA
determines that the product, if approved, would provide safe and
effective therapy where no satisfactory alternative therapy exists or
would be a significant improvement compared to marketed products,
including non-drug products and/or therapies, in the treatment,
diagnosis, or prevention of a disease. A Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research (CBER) product will qualify for a priority
review if FDA determines that the product, if approved, would be a
significant improvement in the safety or effectiveness of the
treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of a serious or life-threatening
disease. FDA has committed to a goal to review and act on 90 percent of
the applications that have been granted priority review status no later
than 6 months after receipt. An application that does not receive a
priority designation will receive a standard review. Under the goals
identified in the letters referenced in section 101(c) of FDAAA, FDA
commits to a goal to review and act on 90 percent of standard
applications within 10 months of the date of receipt. A priority review
involves a more intensive level of effort and a higher level of
resources than a standard review.
Section 524 of the FD&C Act specifies that the fee amount should be
based on the average cost incurred by the Agency for a priority review
in the previous FY. Because FDA has never tracked the cost of reviewing
applications that get priority review as a separate cost subset, FDA
estimated this cost based on other data that the Agency has tracked and
kept. FDA started by using data that the Agency estimates and publishes
on its Web site each year--standard costs for review. FDA does not
publish a standard cost for ``the review of a human drug application
subject to priority review in the previous fiscal year.'' However, we
expect all such applications would contain clinical data. The standard
cost application categories with clinical data that FDA does publish
each year are: (1) New drug applications (NDAs) for a new molecular
entity (NME) with clinical data, and (2) biologic license applications
(BLAs).
The worksheets for standard costs for FY 2010, the latest year for
which standard cost data are available, show a standard cost of
$4,316,567 for an NDA with clinical data and $6,081,461 for a BLA.
Based on these standard costs, the total cost to review the 33
applications in these two categories in FY 2010 (9 BLAs and 24 NDAs
with clinical data) was $158,331,000, rounded to the nearest thousand
dollars. (Note: No investigational new drug (IND) review costs are
included in this amount; they will be calculated separately and added
in the next paragraph.) Records acquired from CDER and CBER by the
Office of Policy and Planning (OPP), Economics Staff, indicate that a
total of 13 of these applications (8 NDAs [excluding the President's
Emergency Plan for Aids Relief NDAs] and 5 BLAs) received priority
review, which would mean that the remaining 20 received standard
reviews. Because a priority review compresses a review that ordinarily
takes 10 months into 6 months, OPP estimates that a multiplier of 1.67
(10 months divided by 6 months) should be applied to non-priority
review costs in estimating the effort and cost of a priority review as
compared to a standard review. This multiplier is consistent with
published research on this subject. In the article ``Developing Drugs
for Developing Countries,'' published in Health Affairs, Volume 25,
Number 2, in 2006, the analysis by David B. Ridley, Henry G. Grabowski,
and Jeffrey L. Moe supports a priority review multiplier in the range
of 1.48 to 2.35. The multiplier derived by FDA falls well below the
mid-point of this range. Using FY 2010 figures, the costs of a priority
and standard review are estimated using the following formula:
(13 [alpha] * 1.67) + (20 [alpha]) = $158,331,000
where ``[alpha]'' is the cost of a standard review and ``[alpha] times
1.67'' is the cost of a priority review. Using this formula, the cost
of a standard review for NMEs is calculated to be $3,796,000 (rounded
to the nearest thousand dollars) and the cost of a priority review for
NMEs is 1.67 times that amount, or $6,339,000 (rounded to the nearest
thousand dollars).
Next, the cost of the IND review phase for these applications is
calculated. The standard lifetime cost of reviewing a drug IND in FY
2010 was $362,102. The standard lifetime cost of a biologic IND review
in FY 2010 was $791,916. Because there were 8 priority NDAs and 5
priority BLAs received in FY 2010, the following formula below
estimates the average cost of the IND review phase of an application:
(8 NDA * $362,102) + (5 BLAs * $791,916) = $6,856,396
This is the full cost of the IND review associated with the 13 priority
review applications received in FY 2010. Dividing $6,856,000 (rounded
to the nearest thousand dollars) by 13 (the total number of priority
review applications received in FY 2010), yields an average IND review
phase cost of $527,000 (rounded to the nearest thousand dollars) per
priority review application.
Adding the cost of the NDA/BLA priority review calculated above,
$6,339,000, to the cost of the IND review phase of $527,000, results in
an estimated average cost for priority review for an application
received in FY 2010 of $6,866,000.
Section 524 of the FD&C Act specifies that the fee amount should be
based on the average cost incurred by the Agency for a priority review
in the previous FY. FDA is setting fees for FY 2012, and the previous
FY is FY 2011. However, the FY 2011 submission cohort has not been
closed out yet, and the cost data for FY 2011 are not complete. The
latest year for which FDA has data is FY 2010. Accordingly FDA will
adjust the FY 2010 cost figure above by the average amount by which
FDA's average salary and benefit costs increased in the 5 years prior
to FY 2011, to adjust the FY 2010 amount for cost increases in FY 2011.
That figure, also published in the Federal Register of August 1, 2011
(76 FR 45831), setting PDUFA fees for FY 2012, is 3.72 percent.
Increasing the FY 2010 average priority review cost figure of
$6,866,000 by 3.72 percent results in an estimated cost of $7,121,000
(rounded to the nearest thousand dollars).
FDA will deduct from this amount the PDUFA fee that must also be
paid (in addition to the priority review fee) when an NDA or BLA with
clinical data is submitted in FY 2012. That amount, also published in
the Federal Register of August 1, 2011, is $1,841,500. The difference,
rounded to the nearest thousand dollars, is $5,280,000. This is the
priority review user fee amount for FY 2012 that must be submitted with
a priority review voucher in FY 2012, in addition to any PDUFA fee that
is required for such an application.
[[Page 53912]]
III. Priority Review Fee Schedule for FY 2012
The fee rate for FY 2012 is set out in table 1 of this document:
Table 1--Priority Review Schedule for FY 2012
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee rate
Fee category for FY 2012
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applications Submitted With a Priority Review Voucher in $5,280,000
Addition to the Normal PDUFA Fee..........................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Implementation of Priority Review Fee
Under section 524(c)(4)(A) of the FD&C Act, the priority review
user fee is due upon submission of the application for which the
priority review voucher is used. Section 524(c)(4)(B) specifies that
the application will be considered incomplete if the priority review
user fee and all other applicable user fees are not paid in accordance
with FDA payment procedures. FDA may not grant a waiver, exemption,
reduction, or refund of any fees due and payable under this section of
the FD&C Act, and FDA may not collect priority review voucher fees
prior to a relevant appropriation for fees for that FY. Beginning with
FDA's appropriation for FY 2009, the annual appropriation language
states specifically that ``priority review user fees authorized by 21
U.S.C. 360n (section 524 of the FD&C Act) may be credited to this
account, to remain available until expended.'' (Pub. L. 111-8, Section
5, Division A, Title VI).
The priority review fee established in the new fee schedule must be
paid for any application that is received after September 30, 2011, and
submitted with a priority review voucher. This fee must be paid in
addition to any other fee due under PDUFA. Payment must be made in U.S.
currency by check, bank draft, or U.S. postal money order payable to
the order of the Food and Drug Administration. The user fee
identification (ID) number should be included on the check, followed by
the words ``Priority Review.'' Payments can be mailed to: Food and Drug
Administration, P.O. Box 979107, St. Louis, MO 63197-9000.
If checks are sent by a courier that requests a street address, the
courier can deliver the checks to: U.S. Bank, Attention: Government
Lockbox 979107, 1005 Convention Plaza, St. Louis, MO 63101. (Note: This
U.S. Bank address is for courier delivery only.) The FDA post office
box number (P.O. Box 979107) must be written on the check. The tax
identification number of the Food and Drug Administration is 53-
0196965.
Wire transfer payments may also be used. Please reference your
unique user fee ID number when completing your transfer. The
originating financial institution may charge a wire transfer fee.
Please ask your financial institution about the fee and include it with
your payment to ensure that your fee is fully paid. The account
information is as follows: New York Federal Reserve Bank, U.S. Dept. of
Treasury, TREAS NYC, 33 Liberty St., New York, NY 10045, Acct. No.:
75060099, Routing No.: 021030004, Swift: FRNYUS33, Beneficiary: FDA,
1350 Piccard Dr., Rockville, MD 20850.
Dated: August 24, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-22062 Filed 8-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P