Petition for Waiver of Compliance, 53997 [2011-22059]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 168 / Tuesday, August 30, 2011 / Notices
contacting Caltrans at the addresses
provided above. The Caltrans FONSI
can be viewed and downloaded from
the project Web site at https://
www.dot.ca.gov/dist07/resources/
envdocs/.
This notice applies to all Federal
agency decisions as of the issuance date
of this notice and all laws under which
such actions were taken, including but
not limited to:
• General: National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C. 4321–
4351]; Federal Aid Highway Act; [23
U.S.C. 109].
• Air: Clean Air Act 42 U.S.C. 7401–
7671(q).
• Migratory Bird Treaty Act [16
U.S.C. 703–712]
• Historic and Cultural Resources:
Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966, as amended
[16 U.S.C. 470(aa)–11].
• Social and Economic: Civil Rights
Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. 2000(d)–2000(d)
(1)]; The Uniform Relocation Assistance
Act and Real Property Acquisition
Policies Act of 1970, as amended.
• Hazardous Materials:
Comprehensive Environmental
response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9601–9675;
Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA);
• Executive Orders: E.O. 11990
Protection of Wetlands; E.O. 11988
Floodplain Management; E.O. 12898
Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low Income
Populations; E.O. 11593 Protection and
Enhancement of Cultural Resources;
E.O. 13112 Invasive Species.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1).
Issued on: August 24, 2011.
Vincent P. Mammano.
Division Administrator, Federal Highway
Administration, Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. 2011–22077 Filed 8–29–11; 8:45 am]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4910–RY–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket Number FRA–2006–24812]
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Part 211 of Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:31 Aug 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
this document provides the public
notice that by a document dated July 27,
2011, BNSF Railway (BNSF) has
petitioned the Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) for a waiver of
compliance from certain requirements
of Federal railroad safety regulations
contained at 49 CFR part 232. FRA has
assigned the petition Docket Number
2006–24812.
BNSF seeks a waiver of compliance
from certain provisions of 49 CFR part
232, Brake System Safety Standards for
Freight and Other Non-Passenger Trains
and Equipment. Specifically, BNSF is
requesting to expand the scope of the
existing waiver that granted relief from
the maximum mileage and inspection
requirements specified by 49 CFR
232.213, Extended haul trains. BNSF
would like to perform the 1,500-mile
extended haul inspection for two
designated trains at points that slightly
exceed the 1,500-mile limit. The two
destination points are Kansas City
Power and Light (KCP&L); Iatan
Generating Plant in Sadler, MO; and
Dynegy, Hennepin Plant in Havanna, IL.
The origination points are various coal
mines in the Powder River Basin that
would exceed the 1,500-mile Class 1
inspection limit between 30.8 and 103.2
miles. Also, BNSF would like to realign
the inspection points. Some inspections
normally performed at Lincoln, NE, may
be reduced on the Dynegy trains by
shifting inspections to Guernsey, WY.
Also, KCP&L train inspections may be
shifted to Guernsey or Donkey Creek,
WY, from Lincoln, NE.
Given the increased demand for coal
by the utility industry, BNSF believes
that granting this relief is critical to
relieving congestion at Lincoln, NE,
while maintaining high-quality
inspections; and the railroad believes
this will not compromise railroad safety.
The following trains are covered by the
requested relief: E–SAIATM, E–
SAIBAM, E–SAIBTM, E–SAICAM, E–
SAICDM, E–SAICRM, E–SAIWTM, C–
ATMPHH, C–BTMPHH, C–ETMPHH,
and C–NAMPHH.
In summary, BNSF respectfully
requests that these trains be granted
inclusion in FRA Waiver 2006–24812,
which was established to resolve
congestion issues in 2006. In the 4 years
that these trains have been operating
under the current waiver, there has been
no adverse impact to safety. Since the
trains covered by this request operate
the very same type of equipment, there
is no anticipated deviation from the
current high level of safety.
BNSF states that it will provide both
mechanical and operating forces with
the list of trains allowed to operate past
the 1,500-mile threshold. Additionally,
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
53997
BNSF would maintain records of
defective conditions discovered during
inspections, as currently required,
including any defective equipment set
out en route.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
• Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Communications received by October
14, 2011 will be considered by FRA
before final action is taken. Comments
received after that date will be
considered as far as practicable.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of any written
communications and comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78) or
online at https://www.dot.gov/
privacy.html.
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 24,
2011.
Robert C. Lauby,
Deputy Associate Administrator for
Regulatory and Legislative Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–22059 Filed 8–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM
30AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 168 (Tuesday, August 30, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 53997]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-22059]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket Number FRA-2006-24812]
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), this document provides the public notice that by a document
dated July 27, 2011, BNSF Railway (BNSF) has petitioned the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) for a waiver of compliance from certain
requirements of Federal railroad safety regulations contained at 49 CFR
part 232. FRA has assigned the petition Docket Number 2006-24812.
BNSF seeks a waiver of compliance from certain provisions of 49 CFR
part 232, Brake System Safety Standards for Freight and Other Non-
Passenger Trains and Equipment. Specifically, BNSF is requesting to
expand the scope of the existing waiver that granted relief from the
maximum mileage and inspection requirements specified by 49 CFR
232.213, Extended haul trains. BNSF would like to perform the 1,500-
mile extended haul inspection for two designated trains at points that
slightly exceed the 1,500-mile limit. The two destination points are
Kansas City Power and Light (KCP&L); Iatan Generating Plant in Sadler,
MO; and Dynegy, Hennepin Plant in Havanna, IL. The origination points
are various coal mines in the Powder River Basin that would exceed the
1,500-mile Class 1 inspection limit between 30.8 and 103.2 miles. Also,
BNSF would like to realign the inspection points. Some inspections
normally performed at Lincoln, NE, may be reduced on the Dynegy trains
by shifting inspections to Guernsey, WY. Also, KCP&L train inspections
may be shifted to Guernsey or Donkey Creek, WY, from Lincoln, NE.
Given the increased demand for coal by the utility industry, BNSF
believes that granting this relief is critical to relieving congestion
at Lincoln, NE, while maintaining high-quality inspections; and the
railroad believes this will not compromise railroad safety. The
following trains are covered by the requested relief: E-SAIATM, E-
SAIBAM, E-SAIBTM, E-SAICAM, E-SAICDM, E-SAICRM, E-SAIWTM, C-ATMPHH, C-
BTMPHH, C-ETMPHH, and C-NAMPHH.
In summary, BNSF respectfully requests that these trains be granted
inclusion in FRA Waiver 2006-24812, which was established to resolve
congestion issues in 2006. In the 4 years that these trains have been
operating under the current waiver, there has been no adverse impact to
safety. Since the trains covered by this request operate the very same
type of equipment, there is no anticipated deviation from the current
high level of safety.
BNSF states that it will provide both mechanical and operating
forces with the list of trains allowed to operate past the 1,500-mile
threshold. Additionally, BNSF would maintain records of defective
conditions discovered during inspections, as currently required,
including any defective equipment set out en route.
Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for
their request.
All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be submitted by any of the following
methods:
Web site: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Communications received by October 14, 2011 will be considered by
FRA before final action is taken. Comments received after that date
will be considered as far as practicable.
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written
communications and comments received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment,
if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages
19477-78) or online at https://www.dot.gov/privacy.html.
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 24, 2011.
Robert C. Lauby,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Regulatory and Legislative
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011-22059 Filed 8-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P