Draft Guidance for Industry on Oversight of Clinical Investigations: A Risk-Based Approach to Monitoring; Availability, 53683-53685 [2011-21972]
Download as PDF
53683
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 167 / Monday, August 29, 2011 / Notices
Respondents: The respondents will be
identified at the time that each change
request is submitted to OMB. Generally
they will be individuals who are
representative of the target groups for
the public assistance research or
evaluation project in question.
ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES
Number of
respondents
Instrument
Survey development field tests, respondent debriefing questionnaires, cognitive interviews and focus groups ...............................................................
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 3000.
Additional Information: Copies of the
proposed collection may be obtained by
writing to the Administration for
Children and Families, Office of
Planning, Research and Evaluation, 370
L’Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington,
DC 20447, Attn: OPRE Reports
Clearance Officer. All requests should
be identified by the title of the
information collection. E-mail address:
OPREinfocollection@acf.hhs.gov.
OMB Comment: OMB is required to
make a decision concerning the
collection of information between 30
and 60 days after publication of this
document in the Federal Register.
Therefore, a comment is best assured of
having its full effect if OMB receives it
within 30 days of publication.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
directly to the following: Office of
Management and Budget, Paperwork
Reduction Project, Fax: 202–395–6974,
Attn: Desk Officer for the
Administration for Children and
Families.
Dated: August 22, 2011.
Steven M. Hanmer,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011–21863 Filed 8–26–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–07–M
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
[Docket No. FDA–2011–D–0597]
Draft Guidance for Industry on
Oversight of Clinical Investigations: A
Risk-Based Approach to Monitoring;
Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft guidance for
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:45 Aug 26, 2011
Jkt 223001
6000
industry entitled ‘‘Oversight of Clinical
Investigations: A Risk-Based Approach
to Monitoring.’’ This guidance is
intended to assist sponsors in
developing risk-based monitoring
strategies and plans for clinical
investigations of human drugs,
biologics, medical devices, and
combinations thereof. The overarching
goal of this guidance is to enhance
human subject protection and the
quality of clinical trial data. The
guidance is intended to make clear that
sponsors can use a variety of approaches
to meet their monitoring responsibilities
when conducting investigational new
drug (IND) or investigational device
exemption (IDE) studies.
DATES: Although you can comment on
any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency
considers your comment on this draft
guidance before it begins work on the
final version of the guidance, submit
either electronic or written comments
on the draft guidance by November 28,
2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for
single copies of the draft guidance to the
Division of Drug Information, Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 2201,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002; the
Office of Communication, Outreach and
Development (HFM–40), Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research,
Food and Drug Administration, 1401
Rockville Pike, suite 200N, Rockville,
MD 20852–1448; or the Office of
Communication, Education and
Radiation Programs, Division of Small
Manufacturers, International and
Consumer Assistance, Center for
Devices and Radiological Health, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, rm. 4613,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to
assist that office in processing your
requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the draft guidance document.
Submit electronic comments on the
draft guidance to https://
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Number of
responses per
respondent
1
Average
burden hours
per response
.5
Total annual
burden hours
3000
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ann
Meeker-O’Connell, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research (HFD–45),
Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm.
5339, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002,
301–796–3150; or Stephen Ripley,
Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research (HFM–17), Food and Drug
Administration, 1401 Rockville Pike,
suite 200N, Rockville, MD 20852–1448,
301–827–6210; or Chrissy Cochran,
Center for Devices and Radiological
Health (HFZ–311), Food and Drug
Administration, 10993 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, rm. 3453, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–5490.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of
a draft guidance for industry entitled
‘‘Oversight of Clinical Investigations: A
Risk-Based Approach to Monitoring.’’
FDA is publishing this new draft
guidance to assist sponsors of clinical
investigations in developing risk-based
monitoring strategies and plans for
clinical investigations of human drug
and biological products, medical
devices, and combinations thereof. This
guidance is intended to make clear that
sponsors can use a variety of approaches
to meet their monitoring responsibilities
during clinical investigations. This
guidance describes a modern, risk-based
approach to monitoring that focuses on
critical study parameters and relies on
a combination of monitoring activities
to effectively oversee a study. For
example, the guidance encourages
greater use of centralized monitoring
methods where appropriate. The
guidance also makes recommendations
about how to develop monitoring plans
and document monitoring activities.
This draft guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The draft guidance, when finalized, will
E:\FR\FM\29AUN1.SGM
29AUN1
53684
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 167 / Monday, August 29, 2011 / Notices
represent the Agency’s current thinking
on implementing a risk-based approach
to the oversight of clinical
investigations. It does not create or
confer any rights for or on any person
and does not operate to bind FDA or the
public. An alternative approach may be
used if such approach satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations.
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
II. The Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (the PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520), Federal Agencies must obtain
approval from the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor.
‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined
in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests
or requirements that members of the
public submit reports, keep records, or
provide information to a third party.
Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal
Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in
the Federal Register for each proposed
collection of information before
submitting the collection to OMB for
approval. To comply with this
requirement, FDA is publishing this
notice of the proposed collection of
information set forth in this document.
With respect to the collection of
information associated with this draft
guidance, FDA invites comments on the
following topics: (1) Whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
FDA’s functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of FDA’s estimated
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information collected;
and (4) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques,
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
Title: Draft Guidance for Industry:
Oversight of Clinical Investigations: A
Risk-Based Approach to Monitoring.
Description of Respondents:
Respondents to this collection of
information are sponsors that monitor
clinical investigations.
Burden Estimate: The draft guidance
is intended to assist sponsors of clinical
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:45 Aug 26, 2011
Jkt 223001
investigations in developing risk-based
monitoring strategies and plans for
investigational studies of medical
products, including human drug and
biological products, medical devices,
and combinations thereof. The guidance
is intended to make clear that sponsors
can use a variety of approaches to fulfill
their responsibilities related to
monitoring investigator conduct and the
progress of IND or IDE studies. The
guidance describes strategies for
monitoring activities performed by a
sponsor, or contract research
organizations (CROs), that focus on the
conduct, oversight, and reporting of
findings of an investigation by clinical
investigators. The guidance
recommends strategies that reflect a
risk-based approach to monitoring that
focuses on critical study parameters and
relies on a combination of monitoring
activities to oversee a study effectively.
The guidance specifically encourages
greater reliance on centralized
monitoring methods, where appropriate.
Sponsors are required to provide
appropriate oversight of their clinical
investigations to ensure adequate
protection of the rights, welfare, and
safety of human subjects and the quality
and integrity of the resulting data
submitted to FDA.1 As part of this
oversight, sponsors of clinical
investigations are required to monitor
the conduct and progress of their
clinical investigations.2 3 The
regulations are not specific about how
sponsors are to conduct monitoring of
clinical investigations and, therefore,
are compatible with a range of
approaches to monitoring. FDA
currently has OMB approval for the
information collection required under
part 812 (OMB control number 0910–
0078) and part 312, including certain
provisions under subpart D (OMB
control number 0910–0014).
However, the collections of
information associated with this draft
guidance that are not currently
1 Part 312 (21 CFR part 312), subpart D, generally
(Responsibilities of Sponsors and Investigators) and
part 812 (21 CFR part 812), subpart C, generally
(Responsibilities of Sponsors).
2 Section 312.50 requires a sponsor to, among
other things, ensure ‘‘proper monitoring of the
investigation(s)’’ and ‘‘that the investigations(s) is
conducted in accordance with the general
investigational plan and protocols contained in the
IND.’’
3 Also see §§ 312.53(d), 312.56(a), 812.40, and
812.43(d).
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
approved under OMB control numbers
0910–0014 or 0910–0078 are as follows:
Development of Comprehensive
Monitoring Plan: Section IV.D of the
draft guidance recommends that
sponsors develop a prospective, detailed
monitoring plan that describes the
monitoring methods, responsibilities,
and requirements for each clinical trial.
The plan should provide those involved
in monitoring with adequate
information to effectively carry out their
duties. All sponsor and CRO personnel
who may be involved with monitoring,
including those who review and/or
determine appropriate action regarding
potential issues identified through
monitoring, should review the
monitoring plan. The components of a
monitoring plan are described in the
draft guidance, including monitoring
plan amendments (i.e., the review and
revision of monitoring plans and
processes for timely updates). FDA
understands that sponsors currently
develop monitoring plans; however, not
all monitoring plans contain all the
elements described in the guidance.
Therefore, our following burden
estimate provides the additional time
that a sponsor would expend in
developing a comprehensive monitoring
plan based on the recommendations in
the guidance. We estimate that
approximately 88 sponsors will develop
approximately 132 comprehensive
monitoring plans in accordance with the
draft guidance, and that the added
burden for each plan will be
approximately 4 hours to develop,
including the time needed for preparing
monitoring plan amendments when
appropriate (a total of 528 hours).
Voluntary Submission of Monitoring
Plans to FDA: Section IV.D of the draft
guidance permits sponsors to
voluntarily and prospectively submit
their monitoring plans to the
appropriate CDER review division and
request input from the division’s
clinical trial oversight component
(sponsors of significant risk device
studies are already required under
§ 812.25(e) to submit and maintain
written procedures for monitoring). We
estimate that approximately 22 sponsors
will submit approximately 33
monitoring plans to CDER for feedback
and that each submission will take
approximately 2 hours to complete (a
total of 66 hours).
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
E:\FR\FM\29AUN1.SGM
29AUN1
53685
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 167 / Monday, August 29, 2011 / Notices
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
Draft guidance on monitoring clinical investigations
Number of
respondents
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden per
response
Total annual
responses
Total hours
Development of Comprehensive Monitoring Plan ...............
Voluntary Submission of Monitoring Plans to FDA .............
88
22
1.5
1.5
132
33
4
2
528
66
Total ..............................................................................
N/A
N/A
N/A
6
594
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
III. Comments
personnel: (1) To assess the quality of
the modified operations and processes
now used by CSR to review grant
applications; (2) To assess the quality of
service provided by CSR to our
customers; (3) To enable identification
of the most promising biomedical
research that will have the greatest
impact on improving public health by
using a peer review process that is fair
unbiased from outside influence, timely,
and (4) To develop new modes of
operation based on customer need and
customer feedback about the efficacy of
implemented modifications. These
surveys will almost certainly lead to
quality improvement activities to
enhance and/or streamline CSR’s
operations. The major mechanism by
which CSR will request input is through
surveys. The major initiatives ongoing at
the present time include: Shortening the
review and application process,
shortening the grant application,
recruiting the best reviewers by
developing additional review modes,
improving study section alignment to
ensure the best reviews, and others.
Surveys will be collected via Internet.
Information gathered from these surveys
will be presented to, and used directly
by, CSR management to enhance the
operations, processes, organization of,
and services provided by the Center.
Frequency of Response: The
participants will respond once, unless
there is a compelling reason for a
subsequent survey. Affected public:
Universities, not-forprofit institutions,
business or other forprofit, small
businesses and organizations, and
individuals. Type of Respondents: Adult
scientific professionals.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written
comments regarding this document. It is
only necessary to send one set of
comments. It is no longer necessary to
send two copies of mailed comments.
Identify comments with the docket
number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
National Institutes of Health
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request; Partner and
Customer Satisfaction Surveys
Under the provisions of
Section 3507(a)(l)(D) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 for the
opportunity for public comment on the
proposed data collection projects, the
Center for Scientific Review (CSR),
National Institutes of Health (NIH), has
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) a request to review
and approve the information collection
listed below. This proposed information
collection was previously published in
the Federal Register on July 22, 2011
(Vol. 76, No. 141, p. 44020) and allowed
60-days for public comment. There was
one public comment received during
this time.
The purpose of this notice is to allow
30 days for public comment. The
National Institutes of Health may not
conduct or sponsor and the respondent
is not required to respond to, an
information collection that has been
extended, revised, or implemented on or
after October 1, 1995, unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number.
Proposed Collection: Title: Extension
of Generic Clearance for Voluntary
Partner and Customer Satisfaction
Surveys.
Type of Information Collection
Request: Extension.
Need and Use of Information
Collection: The information collected in
these surveys will be used by the Center
for Scientific Review management and
SUMMARY:
IV. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the document at either
https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/
GuidanceCompliance
RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/
default.htm, https://www.fda.gov/
BiologicsBloodVaccines/
GuidanceComplianceRegulatory
Information/default.htm, https://www.
fda.gov/MedicalDevices/
DeviceRegulationandGuidance/
GuidanceDocuments/default.htm, or
https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: August 23, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011–21972 Filed 8–26–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
ESTIMATES OF ANNUALIZED HOUR BURDEN
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
[Totals rounded off to the nearest hour]
Number of
respondents
Type of respondent
Frequency of
response
Average time
per response
(Hr)
Total annual
hour burden
Adult scientific professionals (via Mail/Telephone/Internet) ............................
Adult scientific professional (via focus groups) ...............................................
5000
75
1
1
0.25
1
1250
188
Total ..........................................................................................................
5075
........................
........................
1438
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:45 Aug 26, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\29AUN1.SGM
29AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 167 (Monday, August 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53683-53685]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21972]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2011-D-0597]
Draft Guidance for Industry on Oversight of Clinical
Investigations: A Risk-Based Approach to Monitoring; Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft guidance for industry entitled ``Oversight of
Clinical Investigations: A Risk-Based Approach to Monitoring.'' This
guidance is intended to assist sponsors in developing risk-based
monitoring strategies and plans for clinical investigations of human
drugs, biologics, medical devices, and combinations thereof. The
overarching goal of this guidance is to enhance human subject
protection and the quality of clinical trial data. The guidance is
intended to make clear that sponsors can use a variety of approaches to
meet their monitoring responsibilities when conducting investigational
new drug (IND) or investigational device exemption (IDE) studies.
DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency considers your comment on this
draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the
guidance, submit either electronic or written comments on the draft
guidance by November 28, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the draft
guidance to the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 2201, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002; the
Office of Communication, Outreach and Development (HFM-40), Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 1401
Rockville Pike, suite 200N, Rockville, MD 20852-1448; or the Office of
Communication, Education and Radiation Programs, Division of Small
Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance, Center for
Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, rm. 4613, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002.
Send one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in
processing your requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
electronic access to the draft guidance document.
Submit electronic comments on the draft guidance to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ann Meeker-O'Connell, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research (HFD-45), Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 5339, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,
301-796-3150; or Stephen Ripley, Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research (HFM-17), Food and Drug Administration, 1401 Rockville Pike,
suite 200N, Rockville, MD 20852-1448, 301-827-6210; or Chrissy Cochran,
Center for Devices and Radiological Health (HFZ-311), Food and Drug
Administration, 10993 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, rm. 3453, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-5490.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of a draft guidance for industry
entitled ``Oversight of Clinical Investigations: A Risk-Based Approach
to Monitoring.'' FDA is publishing this new draft guidance to assist
sponsors of clinical investigations in developing risk-based monitoring
strategies and plans for clinical investigations of human drug and
biological products, medical devices, and combinations thereof. This
guidance is intended to make clear that sponsors can use a variety of
approaches to meet their monitoring responsibilities during clinical
investigations. This guidance describes a modern, risk-based approach
to monitoring that focuses on critical study parameters and relies on a
combination of monitoring activities to effectively oversee a study.
For example, the guidance encourages greater use of centralized
monitoring methods where appropriate. The guidance also makes
recommendations about how to develop monitoring plans and document
monitoring activities.
This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will
[[Page 53684]]
represent the Agency's current thinking on implementing a risk-based
approach to the oversight of clinical investigations. It does not
create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate
to bind FDA or the public. An alternative approach may be used if such
approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and
regulations.
II. The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3501-3520), Federal Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information they
conduct or sponsor. ``Collection of information'' is defined in 44
U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or
requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records,
or provide information to a third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal Agencies to provide a
60-day notice in the Federal Register for each proposed collection of
information before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To
comply with this requirement, FDA is publishing this notice of the
proposed collection of information set forth in this document.
With respect to the collection of information associated with this
draft guidance, FDA invites comments on the following topics: (1)
Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the
proper performance of FDA's functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's
estimated burden of the proposed collection of information, including
the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected;
and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques, when appropriate, and other forms of information
technology.
Title: Draft Guidance for Industry: Oversight of Clinical
Investigations: A Risk-Based Approach to Monitoring.
Description of Respondents: Respondents to this collection of
information are sponsors that monitor clinical investigations.
Burden Estimate: The draft guidance is intended to assist sponsors
of clinical investigations in developing risk-based monitoring
strategies and plans for investigational studies of medical products,
including human drug and biological products, medical devices, and
combinations thereof. The guidance is intended to make clear that
sponsors can use a variety of approaches to fulfill their
responsibilities related to monitoring investigator conduct and the
progress of IND or IDE studies. The guidance describes strategies for
monitoring activities performed by a sponsor, or contract research
organizations (CROs), that focus on the conduct, oversight, and
reporting of findings of an investigation by clinical investigators.
The guidance recommends strategies that reflect a risk-based approach
to monitoring that focuses on critical study parameters and relies on a
combination of monitoring activities to oversee a study effectively.
The guidance specifically encourages greater reliance on centralized
monitoring methods, where appropriate.
Sponsors are required to provide appropriate oversight of their
clinical investigations to ensure adequate protection of the rights,
welfare, and safety of human subjects and the quality and integrity of
the resulting data submitted to FDA.\1\ As part of this oversight,
sponsors of clinical investigations are required to monitor the conduct
and progress of their clinical investigations.2 3 The
regulations are not specific about how sponsors are to conduct
monitoring of clinical investigations and, therefore, are compatible
with a range of approaches to monitoring. FDA currently has OMB
approval for the information collection required under part 812 (OMB
control number 0910-0078) and part 312, including certain provisions
under subpart D (OMB control number 0910-0014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Part 312 (21 CFR part 312), subpart D, generally
(Responsibilities of Sponsors and Investigators) and part 812 (21
CFR part 812), subpart C, generally (Responsibilities of Sponsors).
\2\ Section 312.50 requires a sponsor to, among other things,
ensure ``proper monitoring of the investigation(s)'' and ``that the
investigations(s) is conducted in accordance with the general
investigational plan and protocols contained in the IND.''
\3\ Also see Sec. Sec. 312.53(d), 312.56(a), 812.40, and
812.43(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
However, the collections of information associated with this draft
guidance that are not currently approved under OMB control numbers
0910-0014 or 0910-0078 are as follows:
Development of Comprehensive Monitoring Plan: Section IV.D of the
draft guidance recommends that sponsors develop a prospective, detailed
monitoring plan that describes the monitoring methods,
responsibilities, and requirements for each clinical trial. The plan
should provide those involved in monitoring with adequate information
to effectively carry out their duties. All sponsor and CRO personnel
who may be involved with monitoring, including those who review and/or
determine appropriate action regarding potential issues identified
through monitoring, should review the monitoring plan. The components
of a monitoring plan are described in the draft guidance, including
monitoring plan amendments (i.e., the review and revision of monitoring
plans and processes for timely updates). FDA understands that sponsors
currently develop monitoring plans; however, not all monitoring plans
contain all the elements described in the guidance. Therefore, our
following burden estimate provides the additional time that a sponsor
would expend in developing a comprehensive monitoring plan based on the
recommendations in the guidance. We estimate that approximately 88
sponsors will develop approximately 132 comprehensive monitoring plans
in accordance with the draft guidance, and that the added burden for
each plan will be approximately 4 hours to develop, including the time
needed for preparing monitoring plan amendments when appropriate (a
total of 528 hours).
Voluntary Submission of Monitoring Plans to FDA: Section IV.D of
the draft guidance permits sponsors to voluntarily and prospectively
submit their monitoring plans to the appropriate CDER review division
and request input from the division's clinical trial oversight
component (sponsors of significant risk device studies are already
required under Sec. 812.25(e) to submit and maintain written
procedures for monitoring). We estimate that approximately 22 sponsors
will submit approximately 33 monitoring plans to CDER for feedback and
that each submission will take approximately 2 hours to complete (a
total of 66 hours).
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
[[Page 53685]]
Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average
Draft guidance on monitoring Number of responses per Total annual burden per Total hours
clinical investigations respondents respondent responses response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Development of Comprehensive 88 1.5 132 4 528
Monitoring Plan................
Voluntary Submission of 22 1.5 33 2 66
Monitoring Plans to FDA........
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... N/A N/A N/A 6 594
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
III. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments regarding this
document. It is only necessary to send one set of comments. It is no
longer necessary to send two copies of mailed comments. Identify
comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
IV. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at
either https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm, https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/default.htm, https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/default.htm, or https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: August 23, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-21972 Filed 8-26-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P