Certain Wind and Solar-Powered Light Posts and Street Lamps; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainants' Unopposed Motion To Terminate the Investigation Based on the Withdrawal of the Complaint; Termination of the Investigation, 53489 [2011-21893]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 166 / Friday, August 26, 2011 / Notices
We will summarize written responses
to this notice and address them in our
ICR submission for OMB approval,
including appropriate adjustments to
the estimated burden. We will provide
a copy of the ICR to you without charge
upon request.
Public Comment Policy: Before
including your address, phone number,
e-mail address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, be advised that your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold from public review your
personal identifying information, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
ONRR Information Collection
Clearance Officer: Armand Southall
(303) 231–3221.
Dated: August 23, 2011.
Gregory J. Gould,
Director for Office of Natural Resources
Revenue.
[FR Doc. 2011–21911 Filed 8–25–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–736]
Certain Wind and Solar-Powered Light
Posts and Street Lamps; Notice of
Commission Determination Not To
Review an Initial Determination
Granting Complainants’ Unopposed
Motion To Terminate the Investigation
Based on the Withdrawal of the
Complaint; Termination of the
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 20) of the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’)
granting complainants’ motion to
terminate the investigation based on the
withdrawal of the complaint in the
above-referenced investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jia
Chen, Office of the General Counsel,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436, telephone (202) 708–4737.
Copies of non-confidential documents
filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:37 Aug 25, 2011
Jkt 223001
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on September 27, 2010, based on a
complaint filed by Duggal Dimensions
LLC; Duggal Energy Solutions, LLC; and
Duggal Visual Solutions, Inc.,
collectively of New York, New York. 75
FR 59291 (Sept. 27, 2010). The
complaint alleged violations of Section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain wind and solar-powered light
posts and street lamps by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. D610,732. The complaint
named Gus Power Inc. of Mississauga,
Ontario, Canada; Efston Science, Inc. of
Toronto, Ontario, Canada; King
Luminaire, Inc. of Jefferson, Ohio; and
The StressCrete Group of Burlington,
Ontario as respondents.
On July 29, 2011, the ALJ issued an
ID (Order No. 18) extending the target
date of the investigation by
approximately two months from January
27, 2012 to March 16, 2012 on the basis
of the parties’ delay to the procedural
schedule.
On August 1, 2011, complainants
filed an unopposed motion to terminate
the investigation based on the
withdrawal of the complaint, stating
that the private parties have entered into
a written settlement agreement
(‘‘Settlement Agreement’’). Public and
confidential versions of the Settlement
Agreement were attached to the motion.
The motion also stated that there are no
other agreements, written or oral,
express or implied, between the parties
concerning the subjection matter of this
investigation. On August 2, 2011, the
ALJ issued the subject ID granting
complainants’ unopposed motion. The
public version of the Settlement
Agreement is attached to the ID. The
ALJ found that complainants’ motion
complies with Commission Rule
210.21(a). In the ID, the ALJ also denied
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53489
a previous motion by respondents to
terminate the investigation (Motion
Docket No. 736–018) and a motion in
limine by complainants to exclude the
testimony of respondents’ experts
(Motion Docket No. 736–716), because
the motions are moot.
The Commission has determined not
to review the subject ID. The
Commission notes that as a result, the
ID extending the target date of the
investigation is moot.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in Section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
section 210.42 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.42).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 23, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–21893 Filed 8–25–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Office of Justice Programs
[OMB Number 1121–NEW]
Agency Information Collection
Agencies: New Collection; Comments
Requested, Census of ProblemSolving Courts 2011
60-Day notice of information
collection under review.
ACTION:
The Department of Justice, Office of
Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice
Statistics, will be submitting the
following information collection request
for review and clearance in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995. The proposed information is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies. Comments
are encouraged and will be accepted for
‘‘sixty days’’ until October 25, 2011.
This process is conducted in accordance
with 5 CFR 1320.10.
If you have additional comments,
especially on the estimated public
burden or associated response time,
suggestions, or need a copy of the
proposed information collection
instrument with instructions or
additional information, please contact:
Ron Malega, 202–353–0487, Bureau of
Justice Statistics, Office of Justice
Programs, Department of Justice, 810
Seventh Street, NW., Washington DC
20531 or Ronald.Malega@usdoj.gov.
Written comments concerning this
information collection should be sent to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 166 (Friday, August 26, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 53489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21893]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-736]
Certain Wind and Solar-Powered Light Posts and Street Lamps;
Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial
Determination Granting Complainants' Unopposed Motion To Terminate the
Investigation Based on the Withdrawal of the Complaint; Termination of
the Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination
(``ID'') (Order No. 20) of the presiding administrative law judge
(``ALJ'') granting complainants' motion to terminate the investigation
based on the withdrawal of the complaint in the above-referenced
investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jia Chen, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-4737. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD
terminal on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on September 27, 2010, based on a complaint filed by Duggal Dimensions
LLC; Duggal Energy Solutions, LLC; and Duggal Visual Solutions, Inc.,
collectively of New York, New York. 75 FR 59291 (Sept. 27, 2010). The
complaint alleged violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States,
the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after
importation of certain wind and solar-powered light posts and street
lamps by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No.
D610,732. The complaint named Gus Power Inc. of Mississauga, Ontario,
Canada; Efston Science, Inc. of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; King
Luminaire, Inc. of Jefferson, Ohio; and The StressCrete Group of
Burlington, Ontario as respondents.
On July 29, 2011, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 18) extending the
target date of the investigation by approximately two months from
January 27, 2012 to March 16, 2012 on the basis of the parties' delay
to the procedural schedule.
On August 1, 2011, complainants filed an unopposed motion to
terminate the investigation based on the withdrawal of the complaint,
stating that the private parties have entered into a written settlement
agreement (``Settlement Agreement''). Public and confidential versions
of the Settlement Agreement were attached to the motion. The motion
also stated that there are no other agreements, written or oral,
express or implied, between the parties concerning the subjection
matter of this investigation. On August 2, 2011, the ALJ issued the
subject ID granting complainants' unopposed motion. The public version
of the Settlement Agreement is attached to the ID. The ALJ found that
complainants' motion complies with Commission Rule 210.21(a). In the
ID, the ALJ also denied a previous motion by respondents to terminate
the investigation (Motion Docket No. 736-018) and a motion in limine by
complainants to exclude the testimony of respondents' experts (Motion
Docket No. 736-716), because the motions are moot.
The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The
Commission notes that as a result, the ID extending the target date of
the investigation is moot.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in section 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure
(19 CFR 210.42).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 23, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-21893 Filed 8-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P