Notice of Intent To Request New Information Collection, 53398-53400 [2011-21848]
Download as PDF
53398
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 166 / Friday, August 26, 2011 / Notices
electronic, mechanical, or other
technical collection techniques or other
forms of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Dated: August 8, 2011.
Edward Knipling,
Administrator, ARS.
[FR Doc. 2011–21847 Filed 8–25–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–03–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Economic Research Service
Notice of Intent To Request New
Information Collection
Economic Research Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and
other public agencies to send comments
regarding any aspect of this proposed
information collection. This is a new
collection for the Rural Establishment
Innovation Survey.
DATES: Written comments on this notice
must be received on or before October
25, 2011 to be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments
concerning this notice to Tim Wojan,
Resource and Rural Economics Division,
Economic Research Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, 1800 M St.,
NW., Room N4110, Washington, DC
20036–5801. Comments may also be
submitted via fax to the attention of Tim
Wojan at 202–694–5756 or via e-mail to
twojan@ers.usda.gov. Comments will
also be accepted through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal. Go to https://
www.regulations.gov, and follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments electronically.
All written comments will be open for
public inspection at the office of the
Economic Research Service during
regular business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5
p.m., Monday through Friday) at 1800
M St., NW., Room N4110, Washington,
DC 20036–5801.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for Office of Management and Budget
approval. All comments and replies will
be a matter of public record. Comments
are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:37 Aug 25, 2011
Jkt 223001
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information contact Tim Wojan
at the address in the preamble. Tel. 202–
694–5419.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Rural Establishment Innovation
Survey.
OMB Number: 0536–XXXX.
Expiration Date: Three years from the
date of approval.
Type of Request: New collection.
Abstract: This survey of business
establishments, funded through USDA’s
Rural Development Mission Area, will
be conducted over a 6-month period
with up to 30,000 respondents to collect
information on rural tradable business
sectors such as manufacturing and
professional services. This information
will contribute to a better understanding
of how rural businesses and their
communities are dealing with the
increasing competitive pressures and
opportunities associated with the spread
of new information technologies
through our economy and the business
and community characteristics
associated with effective response to
these pressures and opportunities. This
information is critical to the Rural
Development Mission Area’s aim of
creating jobs, developing new markets
and increasing competitiveness for rural
businesses and communities.
The information to be collected by the
Rural Establishment Innovation Survey
is necessary to understand: (1) The
adoption of innovative practices and
their contribution to firm productivity;
(2) the availability and use of local and
regional assets (such as workforce
education, local financial institutions,
strong local business and other
economic associations, and
transportation infrastructure) and the
association of these assets with
successful adjustment; and (3) the
extent and importance of participation
in Federal, State and local programs
designed to promote rural business
vitality and growth. This need is made
more urgent by increased international
competition in goods and some service
markets, particularly from low labor
cost countries. The traditional cost
advantage of domestic rural
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
establishments has been significantly
eroded by these developments,
requiring emphasis on new products,
new processes, new marketing channels
and improved customer service. A
thorough understanding of the viability
of the rural business sector requires
collecting information on the capability
for innovation.
As the first collection of information
devoted specifically to innovation in
rural business establishments, the
proposed survey will complement other
Federal efforts in gauging innovative
activity in the private sector.
Information on formal research and
development (R&D) activities is
collected by the National Science
Foundation using the Business R&D and
Innovation Survey. While some of this
formal research and development
activity takes place in nonmetropolitan
counties, it is anticipated that the great
majority of rural innovation occurs less
through the creation of new patentable
products than through the adoption of
new practices and niche marketing. The
emphasis of the proposed collection
will be on understanding the process of
innovation in business establishments
as opposed to measuring R&D inputs.
Another difference between this and
other Federal surveys on innovative
activity will be the focus on constraints
to innovation stemming from
nonmetropolitan locations. Information
on the availability of skilled workers
and the ability to recruit managers and
professionals will inform possible
human capital impediments to
innovation. Information on access to
credit needed for business formation
and development will allow for
assessing financing impediments to
innovation. Information on the
availability of broadband Internet
service and how this capability affects
business strategy will allow assessing
infrastructure impediments to
innovation. Information on interaction
with suppliers, customers, competitors,
business associations and other local
institutions providing real services to
the establishment will inform the
importance of regional clusters to
innovation.
The survey will collect data from
about 30,000 business establishments in
tradable sectors that will include
mining, manufacturing, wholesale trade,
transportation and warehousing,
information, finance and insurance,
professional/scientific/technical
services, arts, and management of
businesses. Only businesses with 5 or
more employees will be included in the
sample. While the focus of the survey
will be on establishments in
nonmetropolitan counties,
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 166 / Friday, August 26, 2011 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
establishments from metropolitan
counties will be sampled in adequate
numbers to allow comparative analysis.
Businesses will be selected at random
from strata defined by establishment
size categories, industry and
metropolitan or nonmetropolitan status
of the county. The sample will be
selected from the business
establishment list maintained by state
employment security departments
where state approval is granted, and
from a proprietary business
establishment list frame for those states
where approval is not granted. The
much more comprehensive coverage of
new and small establishments available
in state administrative data provides a
compelling argument for this hybrid
sample frame approach, as these
establishments are critical to examining
processes of entrepreneurship and
innovation.
The interview protocol will include a
screening interview to identify the most
knowledgeable person in the
establishment to respond to questions
regarding innovative activities of the
entity. Screening greatly improves the
quality and effectiveness of the contact
information. The most appropriate
phone number, e-mail address and
mailing address will be collected at this
time to allow efficient distribution of a
multi-modal survey instrument to the
most appropriate respondent for the
business. Respondents will have the
flexibility to respond to a Web
questionnaire, a mail questionnaire, or a
telephone survey based on their
personal preference. This protocol will
reduce respondent burden by using the
survey mode which is most efficient for
a given respondent. Past research has
demonstrated that multi-modal surveys
also increase survey response rates. A
limited number of control surveys will
be used to assess any mode bias.
Social exchange theory will also be
invoked as this is seen as integral to the
tailored design methodology (Dillman et
al., 2009) that will be employed in this
study to increase response rate. In
addition to offering mixed survey
modes, the design will integrate
multiple and mutually supportive ways
to appeal to the diversity of respondents
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:37 Aug 25, 2011
Jkt 223001
in this business population. The
following are some examples of these
design elements:
• The survey request will be
distinguishable from other surveys and
will emphasize how the information
will be used and describe the benefits
back to the population for responding to
the survey.
• Survey appeals in contacts will
show positive regard and call on the
norms of social responsibility by asking
for respondents’ help and advice, as
some respondents feel rewarded when
they know they have helped others.
• Survey contacts will be personally
addressed, toll free numbers will be
provided for answering questions and
providing help. Confidentiality of
responses will be ensured and
respondents will know how to contact
the surveyor if they have questions on
security or other issues.
• All contacts will be personalized
and will emphasize why the study is
important and express appreciation for
respondents’ help. They will be
formally thanked for promptly
completing questionnaires.
• Small tangible token rewards
provided in advance and at the time of
the survey request will be further tested
with small businesses to encourage
response. Previous survey research has
shown that small cash token incentives
provided with the survey significantly
increase response rates and do much
better than promised rewards or
nonmonetary rewards.
A key component of tailored survey
design is considering and balancing
how features of questions,
questionnaires, mailings, interviewing,
and the context of the survey will
influence trust, cost, and rewards
associated with the survey
circumstances and respondents.
All study instruments will be kept as
simple and respondent-friendly as
possible. Responses are voluntary and
confidential. Responses will be used to
produce statistics and for no other
purpose. Data files from the survey will
not be released to the public.
Affected Public: Respondents include
business establishments with at least 5
employees in both nonmetropolitan and
metropolitan counties.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53399
Estimated Number of Respondents
The survey is cross-sectional and will
be completed at one point in time. The
survey will have a complex mixed
survey administration to include
telephone screening, pre-notification
letter with Web access, multi-contact
telephone interviewing, follow-up
nonrespondent mail questionnaires, and
simultaneous Web questionnaires
offered during all contacts. Completion
time for each questionnaire, based on
comparisons with similar mixed modes
is estimated at 30 minutes per
completion, including time for reading
correspondence, returning an eligibility
postcard or responding to a screening
call, reviewing instructions, gathering
data needed, and responding to
questionnaire items. It is also expected
that those choosing not to participate
will require 10 minutes to review the
materials and decide not to participate.
Full Study: The initial sample size for
the full study is 30,000 businesses. The
expected overall response rate is 80
percent for firms in the main study. The
total estimated response burden for all
of those participating in the study is
12,000 hours (30,000 respondents × 80
percent response rate × 0.50 hours) and
for the non-responding business is 1,000
hours (6,000 respondents × 10 minutes).
Pilot Study: A pilot test of the survey
will be done in advance of the full study
survey. The purpose of the pilot is to
evaluate the survey protocol, and test
instruments and questionnaires. The
initial sample size for this phase of the
research is 4,000 businesses. The
expected response rate is 80% of firms.
The total estimated response burden for
the pilot testing is 1,600 hours (4,000
respondents × 80 percent × 0.5 hours).
Non-responding businesses will
experience 133 hours of burden (800
respondents × 10 minutes). Total
respondent burden is estimated at
14,733 hours (see table below).
Testing will be limited to a maximum
of 9 businesses which will be consulted
on the questionnaire and asked to
complete the questionnaire in a
cognitive interview test.
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
53400
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 166 / Friday, August 26, 2011 / Notices
[FR Doc. 2011–21848 Filed 8–25–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Black Hills National Forest, SD;
Thunder Basin National Grassland,
WY; Teckla-Osage-Rapid City
Transmission 230 kV Project
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Forest Service will
prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) on a proposal by Black
Hills Power (BHP) to construct and
operate a 230 kilovolt (kV) transmission
line between the Teckla and Osage
Substations in northeastern Wyoming to
the Lange Substation in Rapid City,
South Dakota. The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) will be a
cooperating agency on this EIS. The
Teckla-Osage-Rapid City Transmission
230 kV Project would be approximately
150 miles long. It would cross portions
of the Black Hills National Forest and
private lands in South Dakota and
portions of the Thunder Basin National
Grasslands, private lands, BLM lands,
and state lands in Wyoming. The line
would be constructed on wood or steel
H-frame structures for most of its length
with possibly some steel monopole
structures in the Rapid City area. The
structures would be 65 to75 feet tall and
the line would require a right-of-way
approximately 125 feet wide.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis would be most useful if
received by 30 days following the date
of this notice. The draft environmental
impact statement is expected to be
available for public review by November
2012 and the final environmental
impact statement is expected to be
completed by June 2013.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Dave Slepnikoff, Project Manager, Black
Hills National Forest, 8221 South
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:37 Aug 25, 2011
Jkt 223001
Highway 16, Rapid City, South Dakota
57702; or Geri Proctor, Thunder Basin
National Grasslands, 2250 East Richards
Street, Douglas, WY 82633–8922. Send
comments via e-mail to commentsrocky-mountain-black-hillsmystic@fs.fed.us with ‘‘Teckla–Osage–
Rapid City Transmission Project’’ as the
subject. Electronic comments must be
readable in Word, Rich Text or PDF
formats.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Those with questions or needing
additional information should contact
Dave Slepnikoff, Team Leader and
Project Manager, at the Mystic Ranger
District office in Rapid City at (605)
343–1567, or Geri Proctor at the
Thunder Basin National Grasslands in
Douglas, WY at (307) 358–4690.
Individuals who use telecommunication
devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the
Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 between 8
a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday
through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
actions proposed are in direct response
to an application submitted to the Black
Hills National Forest and Thunder Basin
National Grassland by Black Hills Power
(BHP) to construct and operate a 230
kilovolt (kV) transmission line between
the Teckla and Osage Substations in
northeast Wyoming and the Lange
Substation in Rapid City, South Dakota.
The project area covers parts of
Campbell and Weston Counties in
Wyoming, and Pennington, Meade, and
Lawrence Counties in South Dakota.
• Approximately 135 miles of
transmission line.
• Require a 125 foot right-of-way.
• Construction of wood or steel Hframe structures 65–75 feet in height.
This proposal also includes specific
actions needed for interim and final
reclamation.
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose of the Teckla-OsageRapid City Transmission Project is to:
• Strengthen the regional
transmission network.
• Improve the reliability of the
transmission system.
• Provide additional transmission
capacity to help meet the growing
demand for electricity and economic
development in the region.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process, which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement. Comments and input
regarding the proposal will be received
via direct mailing from the public, other
groups, and agencies during the initial
public comment period through October
28, 2011. Public meetings are scheduled
for September 13, 2011 between 4–7 pm
at the Hell Canyon Ranger District
Office, 1225 Washington Boulevard in
Newcastle, WY; and September 20, 2011
between 6–8 pm at the Mystic Ranger
District office, 8221 South Highway 16
Proposed Action
The proposed action is to construct
the Teckla-Osage-Rapid City 230 kV
transmission line as described below:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
The Bureau of Land Management will
be a cooperating agency on this EIS.
Responsible Officials
Craig Bobzien, Forest Supervisor,
Black Hills National Forest, 1019 N. 5th
Street, Custer, SD 57730; and Richard A.
Cooksey, Deputy Forest Supervisor,
Medicine Bow—Routt National Forest
and Thunder Basin National Grassland,
2250 East Richards Street, Douglas, WY
82633–8922.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Forest Supervisors will decide
whether the proposed action will
proceed as proposed or as modified by
an alternative; which recommended
mitigation measures and monitoring
requirements will be applied; and
whether a Forest Plan Amendment is
required.
Preliminary Issues
Anticipated issues include effects of
the project on plants and wildlife
including sensitive species such as sage
grouse, goshawks, and other raptors;
archaeological sites; hydrology and
water quality; and scenic integrity and
visual resources.
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
EN26AU11.014
Dated: July 14, 2011.
Katherine R. Smith,
Administrator, Economic Research Service.
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 166 (Friday, August 26, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53398-53400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21848]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Economic Research Service
Notice of Intent To Request New Information Collection
AGENCY: Economic Research Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and other public agencies to send
comments regarding any aspect of this proposed information collection.
This is a new collection for the Rural Establishment Innovation Survey.
DATES: Written comments on this notice must be received on or before
October 25, 2011 to be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments concerning this notice to Tim Wojan,
Resource and Rural Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, 1800 M St., NW., Room N4110, Washington, DC
20036-5801. Comments may also be submitted via fax to the attention of
Tim Wojan at 202-694-5756 or via e-mail to twojan@ers.usda.gov.
Comments will also be accepted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal.
Go to https://www.regulations.gov, and follow the online instructions
for submitting comments electronically.
All written comments will be open for public inspection at the
office of the Economic Research Service during regular business hours
(8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday) at 1800 M St., NW., Room
N4110, Washington, DC 20036-5801.
All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the
request for Office of Management and Budget approval. All comments and
replies will be a matter of public record. Comments are invited on: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether
the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, including use of
appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information contact Tim
Wojan at the address in the preamble. Tel. 202-694-5419.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Rural Establishment Innovation Survey.
OMB Number: 0536-XXXX.
Expiration Date: Three years from the date of approval.
Type of Request: New collection.
Abstract: This survey of business establishments, funded through
USDA's Rural Development Mission Area, will be conducted over a 6-month
period with up to 30,000 respondents to collect information on rural
tradable business sectors such as manufacturing and professional
services. This information will contribute to a better understanding of
how rural businesses and their communities are dealing with the
increasing competitive pressures and opportunities associated with the
spread of new information technologies through our economy and the
business and community characteristics associated with effective
response to these pressures and opportunities. This information is
critical to the Rural Development Mission Area's aim of creating jobs,
developing new markets and increasing competitiveness for rural
businesses and communities.
The information to be collected by the Rural Establishment
Innovation Survey is necessary to understand: (1) The adoption of
innovative practices and their contribution to firm productivity; (2)
the availability and use of local and regional assets (such as
workforce education, local financial institutions, strong local
business and other economic associations, and transportation
infrastructure) and the association of these assets with successful
adjustment; and (3) the extent and importance of participation in
Federal, State and local programs designed to promote rural business
vitality and growth. This need is made more urgent by increased
international competition in goods and some service markets,
particularly from low labor cost countries. The traditional cost
advantage of domestic rural establishments has been significantly
eroded by these developments, requiring emphasis on new products, new
processes, new marketing channels and improved customer service. A
thorough understanding of the viability of the rural business sector
requires collecting information on the capability for innovation.
As the first collection of information devoted specifically to
innovation in rural business establishments, the proposed survey will
complement other Federal efforts in gauging innovative activity in the
private sector. Information on formal research and development (R&D)
activities is collected by the National Science Foundation using the
Business R&D and Innovation Survey. While some of this formal research
and development activity takes place in nonmetropolitan counties, it is
anticipated that the great majority of rural innovation occurs less
through the creation of new patentable products than through the
adoption of new practices and niche marketing. The emphasis of the
proposed collection will be on understanding the process of innovation
in business establishments as opposed to measuring R&D inputs.
Another difference between this and other Federal surveys on
innovative activity will be the focus on constraints to innovation
stemming from nonmetropolitan locations. Information on the
availability of skilled workers and the ability to recruit managers and
professionals will inform possible human capital impediments to
innovation. Information on access to credit needed for business
formation and development will allow for assessing financing
impediments to innovation. Information on the availability of broadband
Internet service and how this capability affects business strategy will
allow assessing infrastructure impediments to innovation. Information
on interaction with suppliers, customers, competitors, business
associations and other local institutions providing real services to
the establishment will inform the importance of regional clusters to
innovation.
The survey will collect data from about 30,000 business
establishments in tradable sectors that will include mining,
manufacturing, wholesale trade, transportation and warehousing,
information, finance and insurance, professional/scientific/technical
services, arts, and management of businesses. Only businesses with 5 or
more employees will be included in the sample. While the focus of the
survey will be on establishments in nonmetropolitan counties,
[[Page 53399]]
establishments from metropolitan counties will be sampled in adequate
numbers to allow comparative analysis. Businesses will be selected at
random from strata defined by establishment size categories, industry
and metropolitan or nonmetropolitan status of the county. The sample
will be selected from the business establishment list maintained by
state employment security departments where state approval is granted,
and from a proprietary business establishment list frame for those
states where approval is not granted. The much more comprehensive
coverage of new and small establishments available in state
administrative data provides a compelling argument for this hybrid
sample frame approach, as these establishments are critical to
examining processes of entrepreneurship and innovation.
The interview protocol will include a screening interview to
identify the most knowledgeable person in the establishment to respond
to questions regarding innovative activities of the entity. Screening
greatly improves the quality and effectiveness of the contact
information. The most appropriate phone number, e-mail address and
mailing address will be collected at this time to allow efficient
distribution of a multi-modal survey instrument to the most appropriate
respondent for the business. Respondents will have the flexibility to
respond to a Web questionnaire, a mail questionnaire, or a telephone
survey based on their personal preference. This protocol will reduce
respondent burden by using the survey mode which is most efficient for
a given respondent. Past research has demonstrated that multi-modal
surveys also increase survey response rates. A limited number of
control surveys will be used to assess any mode bias.
Social exchange theory will also be invoked as this is seen as
integral to the tailored design methodology (Dillman et al., 2009) that
will be employed in this study to increase response rate. In addition
to offering mixed survey modes, the design will integrate multiple and
mutually supportive ways to appeal to the diversity of respondents in
this business population. The following are some examples of these
design elements:
The survey request will be distinguishable from other
surveys and will emphasize how the information will be used and
describe the benefits back to the population for responding to the
survey.
Survey appeals in contacts will show positive regard and
call on the norms of social responsibility by asking for respondents'
help and advice, as some respondents feel rewarded when they know they
have helped others.
Survey contacts will be personally addressed, toll free
numbers will be provided for answering questions and providing help.
Confidentiality of responses will be ensured and respondents will know
how to contact the surveyor if they have questions on security or other
issues.
All contacts will be personalized and will emphasize why
the study is important and express appreciation for respondents' help.
They will be formally thanked for promptly completing questionnaires.
Small tangible token rewards provided in advance and at
the time of the survey request will be further tested with small
businesses to encourage response. Previous survey research has shown
that small cash token incentives provided with the survey significantly
increase response rates and do much better than promised rewards or
nonmonetary rewards.
A key component of tailored survey design is considering and
balancing how features of questions, questionnaires, mailings,
interviewing, and the context of the survey will influence trust, cost,
and rewards associated with the survey circumstances and respondents.
All study instruments will be kept as simple and respondent-
friendly as possible. Responses are voluntary and confidential.
Responses will be used to produce statistics and for no other purpose.
Data files from the survey will not be released to the public.
Affected Public: Respondents include business establishments with
at least 5 employees in both nonmetropolitan and metropolitan counties.
Estimated Number of Respondents
The survey is cross-sectional and will be completed at one point in
time. The survey will have a complex mixed survey administration to
include telephone screening, pre-notification letter with Web access,
multi-contact telephone interviewing, follow-up nonrespondent mail
questionnaires, and simultaneous Web questionnaires offered during all
contacts. Completion time for each questionnaire, based on comparisons
with similar mixed modes is estimated at 30 minutes per completion,
including time for reading correspondence, returning an eligibility
postcard or responding to a screening call, reviewing instructions,
gathering data needed, and responding to questionnaire items. It is
also expected that those choosing not to participate will require 10
minutes to review the materials and decide not to participate.
Full Study: The initial sample size for the full study is 30,000
businesses. The expected overall response rate is 80 percent for firms
in the main study. The total estimated response burden for all of those
participating in the study is 12,000 hours (30,000 respondents x 80
percent response rate x 0.50 hours) and for the non-responding business
is 1,000 hours (6,000 respondents x 10 minutes).
Pilot Study: A pilot test of the survey will be done in advance of
the full study survey. The purpose of the pilot is to evaluate the
survey protocol, and test instruments and questionnaires. The initial
sample size for this phase of the research is 4,000 businesses. The
expected response rate is 80% of firms. The total estimated response
burden for the pilot testing is 1,600 hours (4,000 respondents x 80
percent x 0.5 hours). Non-responding businesses will experience 133
hours of burden (800 respondents x 10 minutes). Total respondent burden
is estimated at 14,733 hours (see table below).
Testing will be limited to a maximum of 9 businesses which will be
consulted on the questionnaire and asked to complete the questionnaire
in a cognitive interview test.
[[Page 53400]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26AU11.014
Dated: July 14, 2011.
Katherine R. Smith,
Administrator, Economic Research Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-21848 Filed 8-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-18-P