Prevailing Rate Systems; Abolishment of Monmouth, NJ, as a Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Area, 53045-53046 [2011-21776]

Download as PDF 53045 Rules and Regulations Federal Register Vol. 76, No. 165 Thursday, August 25, 2011 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510. The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each week. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 5 CFR Part 532 RIN 3206–AM49 Prevailing Rate Systems; Abolishment of Monmouth, NJ, as a Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Area U.S. Office of Personnel Management. ACTION: Interim rule with request for comments. AGENCY: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management is issuing an interim rule to abolish the Monmouth, New Jersey, nonappropriated fund (NAF) Federal Wage System (FWS) wage area and redefine Monmouth County, NJ, to the Burlington, NJ, NAF wage area. These changes are necessary because the closure of Fort Monmouth will leave the Monmouth wage area without an activity having the capability to conduct a local wage survey. DATES: Effective date: This regulation is effective on August 25, 2011. We must receive comments on or before September 26, 2011. Applicability date: FWS employees remaining in the Monmouth wage area will be transferred to the Burlington wage area schedule on the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after October 15, 2011. ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to Jerome D. Mikowicz, Deputy Associate Director for Pay and Leave, Employee Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Room 7H31, 1900 E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20415–8200; email pay-leavepolicy@opm.gov; or FAX: (202) 606– 4264. srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES SUMMARY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madeline Gonzalez, (202) 606–2838; VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:26 Aug 24, 2011 Jkt 223001 email pay-leave-policy@opm.gov; or FAX: (202) 606–4264. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Monmouth, New Jersey, nonappropriated fund (NAF) Federal Wage System (FWS) wage area is presently composed of one survey county, Monmouth County, NJ. Under section 532.219 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) may establish an NAF wage area when there are a minimum of 26 NAF wage employees in the survey area, the local activity has the capability to host annual local wage surveys, and the survey area has at least 1,800 private enterprise employees in establishments within survey specifications. The Department of Defense (DOD) notified OPM that the imminent closure of Fort Monmouth will leave the Monmouth NAF wage area without an activity having the capability to conduct a local wage survey. After the closure of Fort Monmouth, only 12 employees at Naval Weapons Station Earle (NWS Earle) will remain in the wage area. DOD recommended that OPM abolish the Monmouth NAF FWS wage area and redefine Monmouth County to the Burlington, NJ, NAF wage area. Since Monmouth County will have continuing NAF employment and does not meet the regulatory criteria under 5 CFR 532.219 to be a separate survey area, it must be an area of application. In defining counties as area of application counties, OPM considers the following criteria: • Proximity of largest facilities activity in each county; • Transportation facilities and commuting patterns; and • Similarities of the counties in: overall population; private employment in major industry categories; and kinds and sizes of private industrial establishments. In selecting a wage area to which Monmouth County should be redefined, proximity favors the Burlington NAF wage area. Distance was measured from NWS Earle because after the closure of Fort Monmouth, it will be the only installation remaining in Monmouth County with NAF FWS employees. The transportation facilities and commuting patterns criteria do not favor one wage area more than another. Monmouth County resembles the Burlington survey area in both the overall population and PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 employment criteria and in the kinds and sizes of private industrial establishments criterion. In addition, Monmouth County is adjacent to the Burlington survey area. Based on the application of the regulatory criteria, OPM has determined that Monmouth County should be redefined as an area of application to the Burlington NAF wage area. The proposed Burlington NAF wage area will consist of one survey county, Burlington County, NJ, and six areas of application counties: New Castle County, DE, and Atlantic, Cape May, Monmouth, Ocean, and Salem Counties, NJ. FWS employees remaining in the Monmouth wage area will be transferred to the Burlington wage area schedule on the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after October 15, 2011. The Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee, the national labormanagement committee responsible for advising OPM on matters concerning the pay of FWS employees, has reviewed and recommended these changes by consensus. Waiver of Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Delay in Effective Date Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) and (d)(3), I find that good cause exists to waive the general notice of proposed rulemaking. Also pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), I find that good cause exists for making this rule effective in less than 30 days. This notice is being waived and the regulation is being made effective in less than 30 days because the imminent closure of Fort Monmouth will leave the Monmouth wage area without an activity having the capability to conduct a local wage survey and the remaining NAF FWS employees in Monmouth County must be transferred to a continuing wage area as soon as possible in order to prevent a gap in coverage. Regulatory Flexibility Act I certify that these regulations will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they will affect only Federal agencies and employees. List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532 Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information, Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages. E:\FR\FM\25AUR1.SGM 25AUR1 53046 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 165 / Thursday, August 25, 2011 / Rules and Regulations U.S. Office of Personnel Management. John Berry, Director. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Accordingly, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management is amending 5 CFR part 532 as follows: 14 CFR Part 39 Federal Aviation Administration [Docket No. FAA–2011–0907; Directorate Identifier 2011–NM–146–AD; Amendment 39–16790; AD 2011–18–08] PART 532—PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS RIN 2120–AA64 1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows: Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL–600–2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) Airplanes Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; § 532.707 also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552. AGENCY: ■ Appendix B to Subpart B of Part 532— Nationwide Schedule of Nonappropriated Fund Regular Wage Surveys Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule; request for comments. We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: SUMMARY: 2. Appendix B to subpart B is amended by removing, under the State of New Jersey, ‘‘Monmouth.’’ ■ Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 532— Nonappropriated Fund Wage and Survey Areas 3. Appendix D to subpart B is amended for the State of New Jersey by removing the wage area listing for Monmouth, New Jersey, and revising the wage area listing for Burlington, New Jersey, to read as follows: ■ * * * NEW JERSEY Burlington Survey Area * * New Jersey: Burlington Area of application. Survey area plus: Delaware: New Castle New Jersey: Atlantic Cape May Monmouth Ocean Salem * * * * [FR Doc. 2011–21776 Filed 8–24–11; 8:45 am] srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES BILLING CODE 6325–39–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:26 Aug 24, 2011 Jkt 223001 * There has been one reported case of an aft equipment bay fire occurring due to arcing of chafed integrated drive generator (IDG) power cables. Additionally, the hydraulic line support brackets located at the fuselage station (FS) 672 have been found broken in service on several aeroplanes. A broken hydraulic line support bracket at FS 672 could result in inadequate clearance between the IDG power cables and hydraulic lines, potentially resulting in chafing of the IDG power cables. Chafed IDG power cables can generate high energy arcing, which can result in an uncontrolled fire in the aft equipment bay. * * * * * This AD requires actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI. DATES: This AD becomes effective September 9, 2011. We must receive comments on this AD by October 11, 2011. ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Fax: (202) 493–2251. • Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. • Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–40, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Assata Dessaline, Aerospace Engineer, Avionics and Flight Test Branch, ANE– 172, FAA, New York Aircraft Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone (516) 228–7301; fax (516) 794–5531. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Discussion Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF–2011–18, dated July 7, 2011 (referred to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states: There has been one reported case of an aft equipment bay fire occurring due to arcing of chafed integrated drive generator (IDG) power cables. Additionally, the hydraulic line support brackets located at the fuselage station (FS) 672 have been found broken in service on several aeroplanes. A broken hydraulic line support bracket at FS 672 could result in inadequate clearance between the IDG power cables and hydraulic lines, potentially resulting in chafing of the IDG power cables. Chafed IDG power cables can generate high energy arcing, which can result in an uncontrolled fire in the aft equipment bay. This [TCCA] directive mandates the detailed visual inspection [for chafing and damage] and, if required, rectification of the IDG power cables and hydraulic line support bracket. You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket. FAA’s Determination and Requirements of This AD This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service information referenced above. We are issuing this E:\FR\FM\25AUR1.SGM 25AUR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 165 (Thursday, August 25, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53045-53046]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21776]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 165 / Thursday, August 25, 2011 / 
Rules and Regulations

[[Page 53045]]



OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

5 CFR Part 532

RIN 3206-AM49


Prevailing Rate Systems; Abolishment of Monmouth, NJ, as a 
Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Area

AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Interim rule with request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management is issuing an interim 
rule to abolish the Monmouth, New Jersey, nonappropriated fund (NAF) 
Federal Wage System (FWS) wage area and redefine Monmouth County, NJ, 
to the Burlington, NJ, NAF wage area. These changes are necessary 
because the closure of Fort Monmouth will leave the Monmouth wage area 
without an activity having the capability to conduct a local wage 
survey.

DATES: Effective date: This regulation is effective on August 25, 2011. 
We must receive comments on or before September 26, 2011. Applicability 
date: FWS employees remaining in the Monmouth wage area will be 
transferred to the Burlington wage area schedule on the first day of 
the first applicable pay period beginning on or after October 15, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to Jerome D. Mikowicz, Deputy 
Associate Director for Pay and Leave, Employee Services, U.S. Office of 
Personnel Management, Room 7H31, 1900 E Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20415-8200; email pay-leave-policy@opm.gov; or FAX: (202) 606-4264.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madeline Gonzalez, (202) 606-2838; 
email pay-leave-policy@opm.gov; or FAX: (202) 606-4264.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Monmouth, New Jersey, nonappropriated 
fund (NAF) Federal Wage System (FWS) wage area is presently composed of 
one survey county, Monmouth County, NJ. Under section 532.219 of title 
5, Code of Federal Regulations, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management 
(OPM) may establish an NAF wage area when there are a minimum of 26 NAF 
wage employees in the survey area, the local activity has the 
capability to host annual local wage surveys, and the survey area has 
at least 1,800 private enterprise employees in establishments within 
survey specifications. The Department of Defense (DOD) notified OPM 
that the imminent closure of Fort Monmouth will leave the Monmouth NAF 
wage area without an activity having the capability to conduct a local 
wage survey. After the closure of Fort Monmouth, only 12 employees at 
Naval Weapons Station Earle (NWS Earle) will remain in the wage area. 
DOD recommended that OPM abolish the Monmouth NAF FWS wage area and 
redefine Monmouth County to the Burlington, NJ, NAF wage area.
    Since Monmouth County will have continuing NAF employment and does 
not meet the regulatory criteria under 5 CFR 532.219 to be a separate 
survey area, it must be an area of application. In defining counties as 
area of application counties, OPM considers the following criteria:
     Proximity of largest facilities activity in each county;
     Transportation facilities and commuting patterns; and
     Similarities of the counties in: overall population; 
private employment in major industry categories; and kinds and sizes of 
private industrial establishments.
    In selecting a wage area to which Monmouth County should be 
redefined, proximity favors the Burlington NAF wage area. Distance was 
measured from NWS Earle because after the closure of Fort Monmouth, it 
will be the only installation remaining in Monmouth County with NAF FWS 
employees. The transportation facilities and commuting patterns 
criteria do not favor one wage area more than another. Monmouth County 
resembles the Burlington survey area in both the overall population and 
employment criteria and in the kinds and sizes of private industrial 
establishments criterion. In addition, Monmouth County is adjacent to 
the Burlington survey area. Based on the application of the regulatory 
criteria, OPM has determined that Monmouth County should be redefined 
as an area of application to the Burlington NAF wage area.
    The proposed Burlington NAF wage area will consist of one survey 
county, Burlington County, NJ, and six areas of application counties: 
New Castle County, DE, and Atlantic, Cape May, Monmouth, Ocean, and 
Salem Counties, NJ. FWS employees remaining in the Monmouth wage area 
will be transferred to the Burlington wage area schedule on the first 
day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after October 
15, 2011. The Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee, the national 
labor-management committee responsible for advising OPM on matters 
concerning the pay of FWS employees, has reviewed and recommended these 
changes by consensus.

Waiver of Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Delay in Effective Date

    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) and (d)(3), I find that good 
cause exists to waive the general notice of proposed rulemaking. Also 
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), I find that good cause exists for 
making this rule effective in less than 30 days. This notice is being 
waived and the regulation is being made effective in less than 30 days 
because the imminent closure of Fort Monmouth will leave the Monmouth 
wage area without an activity having the capability to conduct a local 
wage survey and the remaining NAF FWS employees in Monmouth County must 
be transferred to a continuing wage area as soon as possible in order 
to prevent a gap in coverage.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    I certify that these regulations will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they 
will affect only Federal agencies and employees.

List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532

    Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information, 
Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages.


[[Page 53046]]


U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
John Berry,
Director.
    Accordingly, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management is amending 5 
CFR part 532 as follows:

PART 532--PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS

0
1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; Sec.  532.707 also issued under 
5 U.S.C. 552.

Appendix B to Subpart B of Part 532--Nationwide Schedule of 
Nonappropriated Fund Regular Wage Surveys

0
2. Appendix B to subpart B is amended by removing, under the State of 
New Jersey, ``Monmouth.''

Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 532--Nonappropriated Fund Wage and 
Survey Areas

0
3. Appendix D to subpart B is amended for the State of New Jersey by 
removing the wage area listing for Monmouth, New Jersey, and revising 
the wage area listing for Burlington, New Jersey, to read as follows:

 
                                * * * * *
                               NEW JERSEY
                               Burlington
                               Survey Area
New Jersey:
  Burlington
 
                 Area of application. Survey area plus:
 
Delaware:
  New Castle
New Jersey:
  Atlantic
  Cape May
  Monmouth
  Ocean
  Salem
 
                                * * * * *
 

[FR Doc. 2011-21776 Filed 8-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-39-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.