Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request on Two Information Collection Requests, 53123-53125 [2011-21723]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 165 / Thursday, August 25, 2011 / Notices
service, and qualifying facilities filings
can be found at: https://www.ferc.gov/
docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For
other information, call (866) 208–3676
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659.
Dated: August 16, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–21689 Filed 8–24–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OW–2008–0719, FRL–9456–1]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request on Two Information
Collection Requests
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.), this notice announces that
EPA is planning to submit a request to
renew two existing Information
Collection Requests (ICR) to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB).
Before submitting the ICRs to OMB for
review and approval, EPA is soliciting
comments on specific aspects of the
information collections as described at
the beginning of SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be submitted on
or before October 24, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OW–2008–0719, by one of the following
methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: ow-docket@epa.gov
(Identify Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–
2008–0719 in the subject line)
• Mail: Water Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mailcode: 4101T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460. Please include a
total of three copies.
• Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center,
EPA West, Room B102, 1301
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20460. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket’s normal
hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments
identified by the Docket ID No. EPA–
HQ–OW–2008–0719. EPA’s policy is
that all comments received will be
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Aug 24, 2011
Jkt 223001
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket, visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amelia Letnes, State and Regional
Branch, Water Permits Division, OWM
Mail Code: 4203M, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number: (202) 564–5627;
e-mail address: letnes.amelia@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For All
ICRS:
An Agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to collection information unless
it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The OMB control
numbers for EPA’s regulations are
displayed in 40 CFR part 9.
How can I access the docket and/or
submit comments?
EPA has established a public docket
for this ICR under Docket ID No. EPA–
HQ–OW–2008–0719, which is available
for online viewing at https://
www.regulations.gov, or in person
viewing at the Water Docket in the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West,
Room B102, 1301 Constitution Ave.,
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53123
NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC
Public Reading Room is open from 8
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Reading Room
is 202–566–1744, and the telephone
number for the Water Docket is 202–
566–2426.
Use https://www.regulations.gov to
obtain a copy of the draft collection of
information, submit or view public
comments, access the index listing of
the contents of the docket, and to access
those documents in the public docket
that are available electronically. Once in
the system, select ‘‘search,’’ then key in
the docket ID number identified in this
document.
What information is EPA particularly
interested in?
Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the PRA, EPA specifically solicits
comments and information to enable it
to:
(i) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the
Agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(iv) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses. In
particular, EPA is requesting comments
from very small businesses (those that
employ less than 25) on examples of
specific additional efforts that EPA
could make to reduce the paperwork
burden for very small businesses
affected by this collection.
Burden means the total time, effort, or
financial resources expended by persons
to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose
or provide information to or for a
Federal agency. This includes the time
needed to review instructions; develop,
acquire, install, and utilize technology
and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and
requirements; train personnel to be able
E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM
25AUN1
53124
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 165 / Thursday, August 25, 2011 / Notices
to respond to a collection of
information; search data sources;
complete and review the collection of
information; and transmit or otherwise
disclose the information.
What should I consider when I prepare
my comments for EPA?
You may find the following
suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
1. Explain your views as clearly as
possible and provide specific examples.
2. Describe any assumptions that you
used.
3. Provide copies of any technical
information and/or data you used that
support your views.
4. If you estimate potential burden or
costs, explain how you arrived at the
estimate that you provide.
5. Offer alternative ways to improve
the collection activity.
6. Make sure to submit your
comments by the deadline identified
under DATES.
7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA,
be sure to identify the docket ID number
assigned to this action in the subject
line on the first page of your response.
You may also provide the name, date,
and Federal Register citation.
A. List of ICRS Planned To Be
Submitted
(1) Information Collection Request for
Cooling Water Intake Structures New
Facility Final Rule (Renewal); EPA ICR
No. 1973.05, OMB Control No. 2040–
0241; expiration date 12/31/2011.
(2) National Pretreatment Program,
EPA ICR Number 0002.14, OMB Control
Number 2040–0009, expiration date 12/
31/2011.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
B. Individual ICRs
(1) Information Collection Request for
Cooling Water Intake Structures New
Facility Final Rule (Renewal); EPA ICR
No. 1973.05, OMB Control No. 2040–
0241; expiration date 12/31/2011.
Affected entities: Entities potentially
affected by this action are new facilities
that are point sources (i.e., subject to a
NPDES permit) that use or propose to
use a cooling water intake structure
(CWIS), have at least one cooling water
intake structure that uses at least 25
percent (measured on an average
monthly basis) of the water withdrawn
for cooling purposes, withdraw the
water from surface waters, and have a
design intake flow greater than two
million gallons per day (MGD).
Generally, facilities that meet these
criteria fall into two major groups: new
power producing facilities and new
manufacturing facilities. Power
producers affected by the final rule are
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Aug 24, 2011
Jkt 223001
likely to be both utility and nonutility
power producers since they typically
have large cooling water requirements.
EPA identified four categories of
manufacturing facilities that tend to
require large amounts of cooling water:
paper and allied products, chemical and
allied products, petroleum and coal
products, and primary metals. However,
the New Facility Rule is not limited to
manufacturers in these sectors; any new
manufacturer that meets the criteria
above is subject to the rule.
Abstract: The section 316(b) New
Facility Rule requires the collection of
information from new facilities that use
a CWIS and meet the other eligibility
requirements. Section 316(b) of the
CWA requires that any standard
established under section 301 or 306 of
the CWA and applicable to a point
source must require that the location,
design, construction and capacity of
CWISs at that facility reflect the best
technology available (BTA) for
minimizing adverse environmental
impact. See 66 FR 65256. Such impact
occurs as a result of impingement
(where fish and other aquatic life are
trapped on technologies at the entrance
to cooling water intake structures) and
entrainment (where aquatic organisms,
eggs, and larvae are taken into the
cooling system, passed through the heat
exchanger, and then pumped back out
with the discharge from the facility).
The rule establishes standard
requirements applicable to the location,
design, construction, and capacity of
cooling water intake structures at new
facilities. These requirements seek to
minimize the adverse environmental
impact associated with the use of
CWISs.
Burden Statement: The annual
average reporting and recordkeeping
burden for the collection of information
by facilities responding to the section
316(b) New Facility Rule is estimated to
be 1,620 hours per respondent (i.e., an
annual average of 131,188 hours of
burden divided among an anticipated
annual average of 81 facilities). The
State reporting and recordkeeping
burden for the review, oversight, and
administration of the rule is estimated
to average 154 hours per respondent
(i.e., an annual average of 7,233 hours of
burden divided among an anticipated 47
States on average per year).
The ICR provides a detailed
explanation of the Agency’s estimate,
which is only briefly summarized here:
Estimated total number of potential
respondents: 86 facilities and 47 States
and Territories.
Frequency of response: Annual, every
5 years.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Estimated total average number of
responses for each respondent: 5.8 for
facilities (467 annual average responses
for 81 average facility respondents) and
8.9 for States and Territories (420
annual average responses for 47 average
State respondents).
Estimated total annual burden hours:
138,421 (131,188 for facilities and 7,233
for States and Territories).
Estimated total annual costs: $10.6
million per year. This includes an
estimated burden cost of $8.1 and an
estimated cost of $2.5 for capital
investment or maintenance and
operational costs.
Change in Burden: There is an
increase of 20,212 hours in the total
estimated respondent burden compared
with that identified in the ICR currently
approved by OMB. This increase is due
to the addition of the newly built
facilities, as well as the continued
performance of annual activities by
facilities that received their permit
during the previous ICR approval
periods. In addition, this ICR includes
additional repermitting burden and
costs because more facilities are
entering the renewal phase of their
permits.
(2) National Pretreatment Program,
EPA ICR Number 0002.14, OMB Control
Number 2040–0009, expiration date 12/
31/2011.
Affected entities: Various industrial
categories, publicly owned treatment
works (POTWs), local and State
governments.
Abstract: This ICR calculates the
burden and costs associated with
managing and implementing the
National Pretreatment Program as
mandated under CWA sections 402(a)
and (b) and 307(b). This ICR includes all
existing tasks under the National
Pretreatment Program, as amended by
the EPA’s Streamlining Rule.
EPA’s Office of Wastewater
Management (OWM) in the Office of
Water (OW) is responsible for the
management of the pretreatment
program. The CWA requires EPA to
develop national pretreatment standards
to control discharges from Industrial
Users (IUs) into POTWs. These
standards limit the level of certain
pollutants allowed in non-domestic
wastewater that is discharged to a
POTW. EPA administers the
pretreatment program through the
NPDES permit program. Under the
NPDES permit program, EPA may
approve State or individual POTW
implementation of the pretreatment
standards at their respective levels. Data
collected from IUs during
implementation of the pretreatment
program include the mass, frequency,
E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM
25AUN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 165 / Thursday, August 25, 2011 / Notices
and content of IU discharges and IU
schedules for installing pretreatment
equipment. Data also include actual or
anticipated IU discharges of wastes that
violate pretreatment standards, have the
potential to cause problems at the
POTW, or are considered hazardous
under the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA). OWM uses the
data collected under the pretreatment
program to monitor and enforce
compliance with the pretreatment
regulations, as well as to authorize
program administration at the State or
local (POTW) level. States and POTWs
applying for approval of their
pretreatment programs submit data
concerning their legal, procedural, and
administrative bases for establishing
such programs. This information may
include surveys of IUs, local limits for
pollutant concentrations, and schedules
for completion of major project
requirements. IUs and POTWs submit
written reports to the approved State or
EPA. These data may then be entered
into the NPDES databases by the
approved State or by EPA.
Burden Statement: The annual public
reporting and recordkeeping burden for
this collection of information is
estimated to average 73.1 hours per
respondent per year, or 18.1 hours per
response.
Estimated total number of potential
respondents: 24,411 (36 States, 1,548
POTWs and 22,827 industrial users).
Frequency of response: On occasion,
semi-annually, annually, and as needed.
Estimated total average number of
responses for each respondent: 4.0.
Estimated total annual burden hours:
1,784,568 hours.
Estimated total annual costs:
$76,773,776. This includes an estimated
burden cost of $74,454,863 and an
estimated cost of $2,318,913 for capital
investment or maintenance and
operational costs.
Change in Burden: There is a decrease
of 12,5195 (0.7%) hours in the total
estimated respondent burden compared
with that identified in the ICR currently
approved by OMB. Most of the decrease
in burden is attributed to the decrease
in the number of SIUs. EPA revised the
estimated number of SIUs and
pretreatment programs after extensive
consultation with the EPA regions and
a thorough examination of PCS data.
This ICR shows a shift in burden from
POTWs to States as a consequence of
EPA’s updated estimates of of SIUs
regulated by POTWs and States.
However, EPA does not believe this is
the result of programmatic changes but
simply a reflection of more accurate
information about the implementation
of the pretreatment program.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Aug 24, 2011
Jkt 223001
What is the next step in the process for
these ICRs?
EPA will consider the comments
received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will
then be submitted to OMB for review
and approval pursuant to 5 CFR
1320.12. At that time, EPA will issue
another Federal Register notice
pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to
announce the submission of the ICR to
OMB and the opportunity to submit
additional comments to OMB. If you
have any questions about this ICR or the
approval process, please contact the
technical person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Dated: August 12, 2011.
James A. Hanlon,
Director, Office of Wastewater Management.
[FR Doc. 2011–21723 Filed 8–24–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9456–8; Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–ORD–
2011–0425]
Draft Toxicological Review of Libby
Amphibole Asbestos: In Support of the
Summary Information on the
Integrated Risk Information System
(IRIS)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of public comment
period and listening session.
AGENCY:
EPA is announcing a 60-day
public comment period and a public
listening session for the external review
draft human health assessment titled
‘‘Toxicological Review of Libby
Amphibole Asbestos: In Support of
Summary Information on the Integrated
Risk Information System (IRIS)’’ (EPA/
635/R–11/002A). The draft assessment
was prepared by staff in both EPA’s
Region 8 Office (Colorado, Montana,
North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah,
Wyoming, and 27 tribal nations), and
the National Center for Environmental
Assessment (NCEA) within the EPA
Office of Research and Development
(ORD). EPA is releasing the draft
assessment for the purposes of public
comment and peer review. This draft
assessment is not final as described in
EPA’s Information Quality Guidelines,
and it does not represent and should not
be construed to represent Agency policy
or views. When finalizing the draft
document, EPA intends to consider any
public comments that EPA receives in
accordance with this notice. The public
comments submitted in accordance with
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53125
this notice will be made available to the
peer review panel.
The draft document is also being
provided to EPA’s Science Advisory
Board (SAB), a body established under
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, for
independent external peer review. The
public comment period and the EPA
Science Advisory Board (SAB) peerreview, which will be scheduled at a
later date and announced in the Federal
Register, are separate processes that
provide opportunities for all interested
parties to comment on the document.
EPA is also announcing a listening
session to be held on October 6, 2011
during the public comment period for
this draft assessment. The purpose of
the listening session is to allow all
interested parties to present scientific
and technical comments on draft IRIS
health assessments to EPA and other
interested parties attending the listening
session. EPA welcomes the scientific
and technical comments that will be
provided to the Agency by the listening
session participants. The comments will
be considered by the Agency as it
revises the draft assessment after the
independent external peer review. If
listening session participants would like
EPA to share their comments with the
external peer reviewers, they should
also submit written comments during
the public comment period using the
detailed and established procedures
described in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this notice.
DATES: The public comment period
begins August 25, 2011, and ends
October 24, 2011. Technical comments
should be in writing and must be
received by EPA by October 24, 2011.
The listening session on the draft IRIS
health assessment for Libby Amphibole
Asbestos will be held in Arlington, VA,
on October 6, 2011, beginning at 1 p.m.
and ending at 5 p.m., Eastern Daylight
Time, or when the last presentation has
been completed. If you would like to
make a presentation at the listening
session, you should register by
September 29, 2011. To attend the
listening session, register by September
29, 2011, by sending an e-mail to
IRISListeningSession@epa.gov (subject
line: Libby Amphibole Asbestos
Listening Session); by calling Christine
Ross at 703–347–8592; or by faxing a
registration request to 703–347–8689.
Please reference the ‘‘Libby Amphibole
Asbestos Listening Session’’ and
include your name, title, affiliation, full
address, and contact information. To
present at the listening session, indicate
in your registration that you would like
to make oral comments at the session
and provide the length of your
E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM
25AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 165 (Thursday, August 25, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53123-53125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21723]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0719, FRL-9456-1]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request on Two Information Collection Requests
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), this notice announces that EPA is planning to submit a
request to renew two existing Information Collection Requests (ICR) to
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Before submitting the ICRs
to OMB for review and approval, EPA is soliciting comments on specific
aspects of the information collections as described at the beginning of
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before October 24, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-
2008-0719, by one of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the online instructions
for submitting comments.
E-mail: ow-docket@epa.gov (Identify Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OW-2008-0719 in the subject line)
Mail: Water Docket, Environmental Protection Agency,
Mailcode: 4101T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
Please include a total of three copies.
Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room B102,
1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: Direct your comments identified by the Docket ID No.
EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0719. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amelia Letnes, State and Regional
Branch, Water Permits Division, OWM Mail Code: 4203M, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number: (202) 564-5627; e-mail address:
letnes.amelia@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For All ICRS:
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to collection information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
are displayed in 40 CFR part 9.
How can I access the docket and/or submit comments?
EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0719, which is available for online viewing at
https://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Water Docket in
the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is open from
8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.
The telephone number for the Reading Room is 202-566-1744, and the
telephone number for the Water Docket is 202-566-2426.
Use https://www.regulations.gov to obtain a copy of the draft
collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once
in the system, select ``search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified in this document.
What information is EPA particularly interested in?
Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, EPA specifically
solicits comments and information to enable it to:
(i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
(ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden
of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
to be collected; and
(iv) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses. In particular, EPA is requesting comments from
very small businesses (those that employ less than 25) on examples of
specific additional efforts that EPA could make to reduce the paperwork
burden for very small businesses affected by this collection.
Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources
expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or
provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time
needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and
verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and
disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to
comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements;
train personnel to be able
[[Page 53124]]
to respond to a collection of information; search data sources;
complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or
otherwise disclose the information.
What should I consider when I prepare my comments for EPA?
You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
1. Explain your views as clearly as possible and provide specific
examples.
2. Describe any assumptions that you used.
3. Provide copies of any technical information and/or data you used
that support your views.
4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you
arrived at the estimate that you provide.
5. Offer alternative ways to improve the collection activity.
6. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline identified
under DATES.
7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket
ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page
of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal
Register citation.
A. List of ICRS Planned To Be Submitted
(1) Information Collection Request for Cooling Water Intake
Structures New Facility Final Rule (Renewal); EPA ICR No. 1973.05, OMB
Control No. 2040-0241; expiration date 12/31/2011.
(2) National Pretreatment Program, EPA ICR Number 0002.14, OMB
Control Number 2040-0009, expiration date 12/31/2011.
B. Individual ICRs
(1) Information Collection Request for Cooling Water Intake
Structures New Facility Final Rule (Renewal); EPA ICR No. 1973.05, OMB
Control No. 2040-0241; expiration date 12/31/2011.
Affected entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
new facilities that are point sources (i.e., subject to a NPDES permit)
that use or propose to use a cooling water intake structure (CWIS),
have at least one cooling water intake structure that uses at least 25
percent (measured on an average monthly basis) of the water withdrawn
for cooling purposes, withdraw the water from surface waters, and have
a design intake flow greater than two million gallons per day (MGD).
Generally, facilities that meet these criteria fall into two major
groups: new power producing facilities and new manufacturing
facilities. Power producers affected by the final rule are likely to be
both utility and nonutility power producers since they typically have
large cooling water requirements. EPA identified four categories of
manufacturing facilities that tend to require large amounts of cooling
water: paper and allied products, chemical and allied products,
petroleum and coal products, and primary metals. However, the New
Facility Rule is not limited to manufacturers in these sectors; any new
manufacturer that meets the criteria above is subject to the rule.
Abstract: The section 316(b) New Facility Rule requires the
collection of information from new facilities that use a CWIS and meet
the other eligibility requirements. Section 316(b) of the CWA requires
that any standard established under section 301 or 306 of the CWA and
applicable to a point source must require that the location, design,
construction and capacity of CWISs at that facility reflect the best
technology available (BTA) for minimizing adverse environmental impact.
See 66 FR 65256. Such impact occurs as a result of impingement (where
fish and other aquatic life are trapped on technologies at the entrance
to cooling water intake structures) and entrainment (where aquatic
organisms, eggs, and larvae are taken into the cooling system, passed
through the heat exchanger, and then pumped back out with the discharge
from the facility). The rule establishes standard requirements
applicable to the location, design, construction, and capacity of
cooling water intake structures at new facilities. These requirements
seek to minimize the adverse environmental impact associated with the
use of CWISs.
Burden Statement: The annual average reporting and recordkeeping
burden for the collection of information by facilities responding to
the section 316(b) New Facility Rule is estimated to be 1,620 hours per
respondent (i.e., an annual average of 131,188 hours of burden divided
among an anticipated annual average of 81 facilities). The State
reporting and recordkeeping burden for the review, oversight, and
administration of the rule is estimated to average 154 hours per
respondent (i.e., an annual average of 7,233 hours of burden divided
among an anticipated 47 States on average per year).
The ICR provides a detailed explanation of the Agency's estimate,
which is only briefly summarized here:
Estimated total number of potential respondents: 86 facilities and
47 States and Territories.
Frequency of response: Annual, every 5 years.
Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent:
5.8 for facilities (467 annual average responses for 81 average
facility respondents) and 8.9 for States and Territories (420 annual
average responses for 47 average State respondents).
Estimated total annual burden hours: 138,421 (131,188 for
facilities and 7,233 for States and Territories).
Estimated total annual costs: $10.6 million per year. This includes
an estimated burden cost of $8.1 and an estimated cost of $2.5 for
capital investment or maintenance and operational costs.
Change in Burden: There is an increase of 20,212 hours in the total
estimated respondent burden compared with that identified in the ICR
currently approved by OMB. This increase is due to the addition of the
newly built facilities, as well as the continued performance of annual
activities by facilities that received their permit during the previous
ICR approval periods. In addition, this ICR includes additional
repermitting burden and costs because more facilities are entering the
renewal phase of their permits.
(2) National Pretreatment Program, EPA ICR Number 0002.14, OMB
Control Number 2040-0009, expiration date 12/31/2011.
Affected entities: Various industrial categories, publicly owned
treatment works (POTWs), local and State governments.
Abstract: This ICR calculates the burden and costs associated with
managing and implementing the National Pretreatment Program as mandated
under CWA sections 402(a) and (b) and 307(b). This ICR includes all
existing tasks under the National Pretreatment Program, as amended by
the EPA's Streamlining Rule.
EPA's Office of Wastewater Management (OWM) in the Office of Water
(OW) is responsible for the management of the pretreatment program. The
CWA requires EPA to develop national pretreatment standards to control
discharges from Industrial Users (IUs) into POTWs. These standards
limit the level of certain pollutants allowed in non-domestic
wastewater that is discharged to a POTW. EPA administers the
pretreatment program through the NPDES permit program. Under the NPDES
permit program, EPA may approve State or individual POTW implementation
of the pretreatment standards at their respective levels. Data
collected from IUs during implementation of the pretreatment program
include the mass, frequency,
[[Page 53125]]
and content of IU discharges and IU schedules for installing
pretreatment equipment. Data also include actual or anticipated IU
discharges of wastes that violate pretreatment standards, have the
potential to cause problems at the POTW, or are considered hazardous
under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). OWM uses the
data collected under the pretreatment program to monitor and enforce
compliance with the pretreatment regulations, as well as to authorize
program administration at the State or local (POTW) level. States and
POTWs applying for approval of their pretreatment programs submit data
concerning their legal, procedural, and administrative bases for
establishing such programs. This information may include surveys of
IUs, local limits for pollutant concentrations, and schedules for
completion of major project requirements. IUs and POTWs submit written
reports to the approved State or EPA. These data may then be entered
into the NPDES databases by the approved State or by EPA.
Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 73.1
hours per respondent per year, or 18.1 hours per response.
Estimated total number of potential respondents: 24,411 (36 States,
1,548 POTWs and 22,827 industrial users).
Frequency of response: On occasion, semi-annually, annually, and as
needed.
Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent:
4.0.
Estimated total annual burden hours: 1,784,568 hours.
Estimated total annual costs: $76,773,776. This includes an
estimated burden cost of $74,454,863 and an estimated cost of
$2,318,913 for capital investment or maintenance and operational costs.
Change in Burden: There is a decrease of 12,5195 (0.7%) hours in
the total estimated respondent burden compared with that identified in
the ICR currently approved by OMB. Most of the decrease in burden is
attributed to the decrease in the number of SIUs. EPA revised the
estimated number of SIUs and pretreatment programs after extensive
consultation with the EPA regions and a thorough examination of PCS
data. This ICR shows a shift in burden from POTWs to States as a
consequence of EPA's updated estimates of of SIUs regulated by POTWs
and States. However, EPA does not believe this is the result of
programmatic changes but simply a reflection of more accurate
information about the implementation of the pretreatment program.
What is the next step in the process for these ICRs?
EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for
review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.12. At that time, EPA will
issue another Federal Register notice pursuant to 5 CFR
1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the
opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB. If you have any
questions about this ICR or the approval process, please contact the
technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Dated: August 12, 2011.
James A. Hanlon,
Director, Office of Wastewater Management.
[FR Doc. 2011-21723 Filed 8-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P