Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) Airplanes, 53046-53048 [2011-21619]
Download as PDF
53046
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 165 / Thursday, August 25, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
John Berry,
Director.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Accordingly, the U.S. Office of
Personnel Management is amending 5
CFR part 532 as follows:
14 CFR Part 39
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0907; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–146–AD; Amendment
39–16790; AD 2011–18–08]
PART 532—PREVAILING RATE
SYSTEMS
RIN 2120–AA64
1. The authority citation for part 532
continues to read as follows:
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc. Model CL–600–2B19 (Regional Jet
Series 100 & 440) Airplanes
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; § 532.707
also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
AGENCY:
■
Appendix B to Subpart B of Part 532—
Nationwide Schedule of
Nonappropriated Fund Regular Wage
Surveys
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
SUMMARY:
2. Appendix B to subpart B is
amended by removing, under the State
of New Jersey, ‘‘Monmouth.’’
■
Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 532—
Nonappropriated Fund Wage and
Survey Areas
3. Appendix D to subpart B is
amended for the State of New Jersey by
removing the wage area listing for
Monmouth, New Jersey, and revising
the wage area listing for Burlington,
New Jersey, to read as follows:
■
*
*
*
NEW JERSEY
Burlington
Survey Area
*
*
New Jersey:
Burlington
Area of application. Survey area plus:
Delaware:
New Castle
New Jersey:
Atlantic
Cape May
Monmouth
Ocean
Salem
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2011–21776 Filed 8–24–11; 8:45 am]
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Aug 24, 2011
Jkt 223001
*
There has been one reported case of an aft
equipment bay fire occurring due to arcing of
chafed integrated drive generator (IDG)
power cables. Additionally, the hydraulic
line support brackets located at the fuselage
station (FS) 672 have been found broken in
service on several aeroplanes. A broken
hydraulic line support bracket at FS 672
could result in inadequate clearance between
the IDG power cables and hydraulic lines,
potentially resulting in chafing of the IDG
power cables. Chafed IDG power cables can
generate high energy arcing, which can result
in an uncontrolled fire in the aft equipment
bay.
*
*
*
*
*
This AD requires actions that are
intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
September 9, 2011.
We must receive comments on this
AD by October 11, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–40, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Assata Dessaline, Aerospace Engineer,
Avionics and Flight Test Branch, ANE–
172, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York
11590; telephone (516) 228–7301; fax
(516) 794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA), which is the aviation authority
for Canada, has issued Canadian
Airworthiness Directive CF–2011–18,
dated July 7, 2011 (referred to after this
as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states:
There has been one reported case of an aft
equipment bay fire occurring due to arcing of
chafed integrated drive generator (IDG)
power cables. Additionally, the hydraulic
line support brackets located at the fuselage
station (FS) 672 have been found broken in
service on several aeroplanes. A broken
hydraulic line support bracket at FS 672
could result in inadequate clearance between
the IDG power cables and hydraulic lines,
potentially resulting in chafing of the IDG
power cables. Chafed IDG power cables can
generate high energy arcing, which can result
in an uncontrolled fire in the aft equipment
bay.
This [TCCA] directive mandates the
detailed visual inspection [for chafing and
damage] and, if required, rectification of the
IDG power cables and hydraulic line support
bracket.
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are issuing this
E:\FR\FM\25AUR1.SGM
25AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 165 / Thursday, August 25, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined the unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between the AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have required different
actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow FAA policies.
Any such differences are highlighted in
a NOTE within the AD.
FAA’s Determination of the Effective
Date
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves
requirements affecting flight safety, and
we did not precede it by notice and
opportunity for public comment. We
invite you to send any written relevant
data, views, or arguments about this AD.
Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section.
Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2011–0907;
Directorate Identifier 2011–NM–146–
AD’’ at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
this AD. We will consider all comments
received by the closing date and may
amend this AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this AD.
16:26 Aug 24, 2011
Jkt 223001
§ 39.13
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
■
Regulatory Findings
An unsafe condition exists that
requires the immediate adoption of this
AD. The FAA has found that the risk to
the flying public justifies waiving notice
and comment prior to adoption of this
rule because chafed IDG power cables
can generate high energy arcing, which
can result in an uncontrolled fire in the
aft equipment bay. Therefore, we
determined that notice and opportunity
for public comment before issuing this
AD are impracticable and that good
cause exists for making this amendment
effective in fewer than 30 days.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Authority for This Rulemaking
53047
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this AD:
1. Is not a ’’significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ’’significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
2011–18–08 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment
39–16790. Docket No. FAA–2011–0907;
Directorate Identifier 2011–NM–146–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective September 9, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc.
Model CL–600–2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100
& 440) airplanes, certificated in any category,
serial numbers 7003 and subsequent.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 24: Electrical power.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continued airworthiness
information (MCAI) states:
There has been one reported case of an aft
equipment bay fire occurring due to arcing of
chafed integrated drive generator (IDG)
power cables. Additionally, the hydraulic
line support brackets located at the fuselage
station (FS) 672 have been found broken in
service on several aeroplanes. A broken
hydraulic line support bracket at FS 672
could result in inadequate clearance between
the IDG power cables and hydraulic lines,
potentially resulting in chafing of the IDG
power cables. Chafed IDG power cables can
generate high energy arcing, which can result
in an uncontrolled fire in the aft equipment
bay.
*
*
*
*
*
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Actions
(g) Within 45 days after the effective date
of this AD, do a detailed inspection for
chafed or damaged IDG power cables from
fuselage station FS652 to FS672, between
stringers 8R and 10R, and for cracked or
broken hydraulic line support brackets at
FS672.
(1) If chafing or damage is found on any
IDG power cable, before further flight,
replace the IDG power cable using a method
approved by either the Manager, New York
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170,
FAA, or Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA) (or its delegated agent).
(2) If any cracking or breaking is found on
any hydraulic line support bracket at FS672,
before further flight, replace the hydraulic
line support bracket using a method
approved by either the Manager, New York
ACO, ANE–170, FAA, or TCCA (or its
delegated agent).
Reporting
(h) Submit a report of the findings of the
inspection required by paragraph (g) of this
E:\FR\FM\25AUR1.SGM
25AUR1
53048
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 165 / Thursday, August 25, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
AD to Bombardier Regional Aircraft
Customer Response Center, 13100 Boulevard
Henri-Fabre, Mirabel, Quebec, Canada J7N
3C6; telephone: 1–514–855–8500; fax:
1–514–855–8501; e-mail:
thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com, at the
applicable time specified in paragraph (h)(1)
or (h)(2) of this AD. The report must include
any finding of chafing of the IDG power cable
or broken hydraulic line support bracket, the
airplane serial number, and the number of
landings and flight hours on the airplane.
(1) If the inspection was done on or after
the effective date of this AD: Submit the
report within 10 days after the inspection.
(2) If the inspection was done before the
effective date of this AD: Submit the report
within 10 days after the effective date of this
AD.
suggestions for reducing the burden should
be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence
Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
AES–200.
FAA AD Differences
[FR Doc. 2011–21619 Filed 8–24–11; 8:45 am]
Related Information
(j) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness
Directive CF–2011–18, dated July 7, 2011, for
related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(k) None.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August
12, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Other FAA AD Provisions
(i) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN:
Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York
11590; telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516–
794–5531. Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: A Federal
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, nor
shall a person be subject to a penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of
information subject to the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
collection of information displays a current
valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
Control Number for this information
collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to
be approximately 5 minutes per response,
including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing and reviewing the collection of
information. All responses to this collection
of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Aug 24, 2011
Jkt 223001
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0439; Airspace
Docket No. 11–ANM–10]
Amendment of Class D and Class E
Airspace and Establishment of Class E
Airspace; Casper, WY
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action amends Class D
and Class E airspace at Casper, Natrona
County International Airport, Casper,
WY, by adjusting the geographic
coordinates of the airport. This action
also establishes Class E En Route
Domestic airspace at the airport to
improve the safety and management of
IFR operations.
DATES: Effective date, 0901 UTC,
October 20, 2011. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this
incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support
Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 98057;
telephone (425) 203–4537.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
History
On June 21, 2011, the FAA published
in the Federal Register a notice of
proposed rulemaking to amend
controlled airspace at Casper, WY (76
FR 36017). Interested parties were
invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
on the proposal to the FAA. No
comments were received.
Class D and Class E airspace
designations are published in
paragraphs 5000, 6002, 6004, 6005 and
6006, respectively, of FAA Order
7400.9U dated August 18, 2010, and
effective September 15, 2010, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class D and Class E airspace
designations listed in this document
will be published subsequently in that
Order.
The Rule
This action amends Title 14 Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by
amending Class D airspace, Class E
surface airspace, Class E airspace
designated as an extension, and Class E
airspace extending upward from 700/
1,200 feet above the surface, by
adjusting the geographic coordinates of
Casper, Natrona County International
Airport to be in concert with the FAA’s
aeronautical database. Also, this action
establishes Class E en route domestic
airspace extending upward from 1,200
feet above the surface to facilitate
vectoring of Instrument Flight Rules
(IFR) traffic from en route airspace to
the airport. This enhances the safety and
management of IFR operations at the
airport.
The FAA has determined this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it
is certified this rule, when promulgated,
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. The FAA’s
authority to issue rules regarding
aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the
U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, section 106
discusses the authority of the FAA
Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the
scope of the agency’s authority. This
rulemaking is promulgated under the
authority described in subtitle VII, part
A, subpart I, section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
E:\FR\FM\25AUR1.SGM
25AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 165 (Thursday, August 25, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53046-53048]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21619]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2011-0907; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-146-AD;
Amendment 39-16790; AD 2011-18-08]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B19
(Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
There has been one reported case of an aft equipment bay fire
occurring due to arcing of chafed integrated drive generator (IDG)
power cables. Additionally, the hydraulic line support brackets
located at the fuselage station (FS) 672 have been found broken in
service on several aeroplanes. A broken hydraulic line support
bracket at FS 672 could result in inadequate clearance between the
IDG power cables and hydraulic lines, potentially resulting in
chafing of the IDG power cables. Chafed IDG power cables can
generate high energy arcing, which can result in an uncontrolled
fire in the aft equipment bay.
* * * * *
This AD requires actions that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: This AD becomes effective September 9, 2011.
We must receive comments on this AD by October 11, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Assata Dessaline, Aerospace Engineer,
Avionics and Flight Test Branch, ANE-172, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone (516) 228-7301; fax (516) 794-5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2011-18, dated July 7, 2011 (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''),
to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
There has been one reported case of an aft equipment bay fire
occurring due to arcing of chafed integrated drive generator (IDG)
power cables. Additionally, the hydraulic line support brackets
located at the fuselage station (FS) 672 have been found broken in
service on several aeroplanes. A broken hydraulic line support
bracket at FS 672 could result in inadequate clearance between the
IDG power cables and hydraulic lines, potentially resulting in
chafing of the IDG power cables. Chafed IDG power cables can
generate high energy arcing, which can result in an uncontrolled
fire in the aft equipment bay.
This [TCCA] directive mandates the detailed visual inspection
[for chafing and damage] and, if required, rectification of the IDG
power cables and hydraulic line support bracket.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are issuing this
[[Page 53047]]
AD because we evaluated all pertinent information and determined the
unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other
products of the same type design.
Differences Between the AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
FAA's Determination of the Effective Date
An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies
waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because
chafed IDG power cables can generate high energy arcing, which can
result in an uncontrolled fire in the aft equipment bay. Therefore, we
determined that notice and opportunity for public comment before
issuing this AD are impracticable and that good cause exists for making
this amendment effective in fewer than 30 days.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public
comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under
the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-0907; Directorate
Identifier 2011-NM-146-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of
those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ''significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ''significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2011-18-08 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-16790. Docket No. FAA-
2011-0907; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-146-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective
September 9, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B19
(Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) airplanes, certificated in any
category, serial numbers 7003 and subsequent.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 24:
Electrical power.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continued airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
There has been one reported case of an aft equipment bay fire
occurring due to arcing of chafed integrated drive generator (IDG)
power cables. Additionally, the hydraulic line support brackets
located at the fuselage station (FS) 672 have been found broken in
service on several aeroplanes. A broken hydraulic line support
bracket at FS 672 could result in inadequate clearance between the
IDG power cables and hydraulic lines, potentially resulting in
chafing of the IDG power cables. Chafed IDG power cables can
generate high energy arcing, which can result in an uncontrolled
fire in the aft equipment bay.
* * * * *
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Actions
(g) Within 45 days after the effective date of this AD, do a
detailed inspection for chafed or damaged IDG power cables from
fuselage station FS652 to FS672, between stringers 8R and 10R, and
for cracked or broken hydraulic line support brackets at FS672.
(1) If chafing or damage is found on any IDG power cable, before
further flight, replace the IDG power cable using a method approved
by either the Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
ANE-170, FAA, or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA) (or its
delegated agent).
(2) If any cracking or breaking is found on any hydraulic line
support bracket at FS672, before further flight, replace the
hydraulic line support bracket using a method approved by either the
Manager, New York ACO, ANE-170, FAA, or TCCA (or its delegated
agent).
Reporting
(h) Submit a report of the findings of the inspection required
by paragraph (g) of this
[[Page 53048]]
AD to Bombardier Regional Aircraft Customer Response Center, 13100
Boulevard Henri-Fabre, Mirabel, Quebec, Canada J7N 3C6; telephone:
1-514-855-8500; fax: 1-514-855-8501; e-mail:
thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com, at the applicable time specified in
paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD. The report must include any
finding of chafing of the IDG power cable or broken hydraulic line
support bracket, the airplane serial number, and the number of
landings and flight hours on the airplane.
(1) If the inspection was done on or after the effective date of
this AD: Submit the report within 10 days after the inspection.
(2) If the inspection was done before the effective date of this
AD: Submit the report within 10 days after the effective date of
this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(i) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing
Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone 516-228-7300; fax 516-794-
5531. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: A Federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a
person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information
displays a current valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number
for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 5
minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing and reviewing the collection of information. All
responses to this collection of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing
the burden should be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave.,
SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: Information Collection Clearance
Officer, AES-200.
Related Information
(j) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2011-18,
dated July 7, 2011, for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(k) None.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 12, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-21619 Filed 8-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P