Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 767-200, -300, and -300F Series Airplanes, 52899-52901 [2011-21667]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 24, 2011 / Proposed Rules
It is DOE’s policy that all comments
may be included in the public docket,
without change and as received,
including any personal information
provided in the comments (except
information deemed to be exempt from
public disclosure).
B. Issues on Which DOE Seeks Comment
Although DOE welcomes comments
on any aspect of this notice, DOE is
particularly interested in receiving
comments and views of interested
parties concerning the following issues:
(1) The conclusion that after removing
0.8 percent NEMA’s reduction factor
and recalculating lamp arc powers, the
remaining differences between DOE and
NEMA-provided data are likely due to
normal measurement variation;
(2) The methodology used to account
for compliance certification
requirements and measurement
variation in developing efficiency
levels;
(3) The appropriateness of using a
power law equation to develop
efficiency levels and the chosen values
for the exponent ‘‘C’’; and
(4) The efficiency levels considered.
VII. Approval of the Office of the
Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved
publication of this notice of data
availability.
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 18,
2011.
Timothy Unruh,
Program Manager, Federal Energy
Management Program, Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy.
[FR Doc. 2011–21636 Filed 8–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
Examining the AD Docket
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0725; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–065–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Model 767–200, –300, and
–300F Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
model 767–200, –300, and –300F series
airplanes. This proposed AD would
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Aug 23, 2011
require doing certain wiring changes,
installing a new relay and necessary
wiring in the cabin air conditioning and
temperature control system (CACTCS),
and performing an operational test of
the cooling pack fire suppression
system. This AD results from reports of
loss of avionics cooling due to an
unserviceable relay installed on a panel
as part of the CACTCS. We are
proposing this AD to prevent loss of
electrical equipment bay cooling and
the overheating of flight deck
instruments, which would result in the
eventual loss of primary flight displays,
an unusually high pilot workload, and
depressurization of the cabin.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by October 11, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124–
2207; telephone 206–544–5000,
extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; e-mail
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221.
Jkt 223001
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ana
Martinez Hueto, Aerospace Engineer,
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
52899
Cabin Safety and Environmental
Systems Branch, ANM–150S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6592; fax:
425–917–6590; e-mail:
ana.m.hueto@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2011–0725; Directorate Identifier 2011–
NM–065–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We received reports of loss of avionics
cooling due to an unserviceable relay.
This relay was one of six relays installed
on a panel as part of the CACTCS. The
failure of this relay caused a smoke
mode solenoid to energize, causing the
air conditioning system to go into a
Class E fire suppression mode, the right
side of the relay pack to turn off, and the
left-side relay pack to go into low-flow
mode. Over time, this caused
insufficient equipment cooling and the
slow depressurization of the cabin. This
condition, if not corrected, could result
in loss of electrical equipment bay
cooling and the overheating of flight
deck instruments, which would result
in the eventual loss of all primary flight
displays, an unusually high pilot
workload, and depressurization of the
cabin.
Relevant Service Information
We reviewed Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletins 767–21–
0246, dated January 7, 2011 (for Model
767–200 and 767–300 series airplanes);
and 767–21–0234, dated August 6, 2009
(for Model 767–300F series airplanes).
These service bulletins describe
procedures for changing the wire bundle
route and wiring, installing a new relay
and applicable wiring in the CACTCS,
and doing an operational test of the
cooling pack fire suppression system.
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
52900
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 24, 2011 / Proposed Rules
FAA’s Determination and Proposed AD
Requirements
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of these same
type designs. This proposed AD would
require accomplishing the actions
specified in the service information
described previously.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 35 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
estimate the following costs to comply
with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Parts cost
Action
Labor cost
Change wire bundle, install relay, and operational
test.
29 work-hours × $85 per hour = $2,465 per relay
installation.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in subtitle VII,
part A, subpart III, section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Aug 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
Cost per
product
$1,240
$3,705
Cost on U.S.
operators
$129,675
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
cooling and the overheating of flight deck
instruments, which would result in the
eventual loss of primary flight displays, an
unusually high pilot workload, and
depressurization of the cabin.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
Compliance
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA–
2011–0725; Directorate Identifier 2010–
NM–065–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by October
11, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to The Boeing
Company Model 767–200 and -300 series
airplanes, certificated in any category, as
identified in Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 767–21–0246, dated January
7, 2011; and Model 767–300F series
airplanes, certificated in any category, as
identified in Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 767–21–0234, dated August
6, 2009.
Subject
(d) Joint Aircraft System Component
(JASC)/Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 21: Air conditioning.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD results from reports of loss of
avionics cooling due to an unserviceable
relay installed on a panel as part of the cabin
air conditioning and temperature control
system (CACTCS). We are issuing this AD to
prevent loss of electrical equipment bay
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(f) Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
Installation of New Relay and Wiring
Bundle
(g) Within 72 months after the effective
date of this AD: Change the wire bundle
route and wiring, install a new relay and
applicable wiring in the CACTCS, and do an
operational test, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the service
information specified in paragraph (g)(1) or
(g)(2) of this AD, as applicable.
(1) For Model 767–200 and 767–300 series
airplanes: Use Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 767–21–0246, dated January
7, 2011.
(2) For Model 767–300F series airplanes:
Use Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 767–21–0234, dated August 6, 2009.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the
Related Information section of this AD.
Information may be e-mailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
Related Information
(i) For more information about this AD,
contact Ana Martinez Hueto, Aerospace
Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental
Systems Branch, ANM–150S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
phone 425–917–6592; fax 425–917–6590;
e-mail: ana.m.hueto@faa.gov.
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 24, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(j) For service information identified in this
AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes,
Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O.
Box 3707, MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington
98124–2207; telephone 206–544–5000,
extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; e-mail
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review
copies of the referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August
12, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–21667 Filed 8–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0724; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–181–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Model 757–200, –200PF, and
–200CB Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to supersede an
existing airworthiness directive (AD)
that applies to the products listed above.
The existing AD currently requires
repetitive inspections of the shim
installation between the engine strut
vertical flange and bulkhead, and repair
if necessary. The existing AD also
requires, for certain airplanes, an
inspection for cracking of the four
critical fastener holes in the horizontal
flange, and repair if necessary.
Additionally, the existing AD requires
that the existing action be performed on
airplanes without conclusive records of
previous inspections. Since we issued
that AD, we have received reports of
loose fasteners and cracks at the joint
common to the aft torque bulkhead and
strut-to-diagonal brace fitting and one
report of such damage occurring less
than 3,000 flight cycles after the last
inspection. This proposed AD would
reduce the repetitive inspection
interval, and add repetitive detailed
inspections for cracking of the
bulkhead, and repair if necessary. This
proposed AD would also provide an
option, for certain airplanes, to extend
wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Aug 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
the repetitive intervals by also doing
repetitive ultrasonic inspections for
cracking of the bulkhead, and repair if
necessary. This proposed AD would
also add an option for the high
frequency eddy current inspection for
cracking of the critical fastener holes,
and repair if necessary. We are
proposing this AD to detect and correct
cracks, loose and broken bolts, and shim
migration in the joint between the aft
torque bulkhead and the strut-todiagonal brace fitting, which could
result in damage to the strut and
consequent separation of the strut and
engine from the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by October 11, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207;
phone: 206–544–5000, extension 1; fax:
206–766–5680; e-mail:
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet:
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nancy Marsh, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, Seattle
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
52901
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; phone: 425–
917–6440; fax: 425–917–6590; e-mail:
Nancy.Marsh@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2011–0724; Directorate Identifier
2010–NM–181–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On February 22, 2008, we issued AD
2008–05–10, Amendment 39–15404 (73
FR 11347, March 3, 2008), for certain
Boeing Model 757–200, –200PF, and
–200CB series airplanes powered by
Rolls-Royce engines. That AD requires
repetitive inspections of the shim
installation between the engine strut
vertical flange and bulkhead, and repair
if necessary. That AD also requires, for
certain airplanes, an inspection for
cracking of the four critical fastener
holes in the horizontal flange, and
repair if necessary. That AD resulted
from reports of cracking in the pylon
under bolts that appear to be
undamaged during the existing AD
inspections. That AD also resulted from
our determination that operators did not
maintain records of previous
inspections that are necessary to
determine the appropriate corrective
actions. We issued that AD to detect and
correct cracks, loose and broken bolts,
and shim migration in the joint between
the aft torque bulkhead and the strut-todiagonal brace fitting, which could
result in damage to the strut and
consequent separation of the strut and
engine from the airplane.
Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued
Since we issued AD 2008–05–10, we
have received reports of loose fasteners
and cracks at the joint common to the
aft torque bulkhead and strut-todiagonal brace fitting and one report of
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 164 (Wednesday, August 24, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 52899-52901]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21667]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2011-0725; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-065-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 767-200, -300,
and -300F Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain model 767-200, -300, and -300F series airplanes. This proposed
AD would require doing certain wiring changes, installing a new relay
and necessary wiring in the cabin air conditioning and temperature
control system (CACTCS), and performing an operational test of the
cooling pack fire suppression system. This AD results from reports of
loss of avionics cooling due to an unserviceable relay installed on a
panel as part of the CACTCS. We are proposing this AD to prevent loss
of electrical equipment bay cooling and the overheating of flight deck
instruments, which would result in the eventual loss of primary flight
displays, an unusually high pilot workload, and depressurization of the
cabin.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 11,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-
544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ana Martinez Hueto, Aerospace
Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM-150S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6592; fax: 425-917-6590; e-mail:
ana.m.hueto@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-0725;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-065-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We received reports of loss of avionics cooling due to an
unserviceable relay. This relay was one of six relays installed on a
panel as part of the CACTCS. The failure of this relay caused a smoke
mode solenoid to energize, causing the air conditioning system to go
into a Class E fire suppression mode, the right side of the relay pack
to turn off, and the left-side relay pack to go into low-flow mode.
Over time, this caused insufficient equipment cooling and the slow
depressurization of the cabin. This condition, if not corrected, could
result in loss of electrical equipment bay cooling and the overheating
of flight deck instruments, which would result in the eventual loss of
all primary flight displays, an unusually high pilot workload, and
depressurization of the cabin.
Relevant Service Information
We reviewed Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletins 767-21-0246,
dated January 7, 2011 (for Model 767-200 and 767-300 series airplanes);
and 767-21-0234, dated August 6, 2009 (for Model 767-300F series
airplanes). These service bulletins describe procedures for changing
the wire bundle route and wiring, installing a new relay and applicable
wiring in the CACTCS, and doing an operational test of the cooling pack
fire suppression system.
[[Page 52900]]
FAA's Determination and Proposed AD Requirements
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of these same type
designs. This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions
specified in the service information described previously.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 35 airplanes of U.S.
registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed
AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change wire bundle, install relay, and 29 work-hours x $85 per hour $1,240 $3,705 $129,675
operational test. = $2,465 per relay
installation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2011-0725; Directorate Identifier
2010-NM-065-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by October 11, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 767-200 and -300
series airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 767-21-0246, dated January
7, 2011; and Model 767-300F series airplanes, certificated in any
category, as identified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
767-21-0234, dated August 6, 2009.
Subject
(d) Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport
Association (ATA) of America Code 21: Air conditioning.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD results from reports of loss of avionics cooling due
to an unserviceable relay installed on a panel as part of the cabin
air conditioning and temperature control system (CACTCS). We are
issuing this AD to prevent loss of electrical equipment bay cooling
and the overheating of flight deck instruments, which would result
in the eventual loss of primary flight displays, an unusually high
pilot workload, and depressurization of the cabin.
Compliance
(f) Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
Installation of New Relay and Wiring Bundle
(g) Within 72 months after the effective date of this AD: Change
the wire bundle route and wiring, install a new relay and applicable
wiring in the CACTCS, and do an operational test, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of the service information specified
in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, as applicable.
(1) For Model 767-200 and 767-300 series airplanes: Use Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 767-21-0246, dated January 7,
2011.
(2) For Model 767-300F series airplanes: Use Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 767-21-0234, dated August 6, 2009.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the Related Information
section of this AD. Information may be e-mailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
Related Information
(i) For more information about this AD, contact Ana Martinez
Hueto, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems
Branch, ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone 425-917-6592; fax
425-917-6590; e-mail: ana.m.hueto@faa.gov.
[[Page 52901]]
(j) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone
206-544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; e-mail
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 12, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-21667 Filed 8-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P