Rules Governing Hearings Before the Agency of Original Jurisdiction and the Board of Veterans' Appeals; Clarification, 52572-52575 [2011-21513]
Download as PDF
52572
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 23, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves the establishment of a RNA. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
(2) All vessels must remain at least
150 feet from all drilling and blasting
equipment; if a vessel must pass within
150 feet of drilling and blasting
equipment for reasons of safety, they
shall contact the dredge and/or blasting
barge on Channel 13.
(3) No vessel shall enter or transit any
work area where drill barges and/or
dredges are located without the
permission of Vessel Traffic Service
New York (VTSNY) Director.
(4) No vessel may be underway within
1,500 feet of the blasting area during
blasting operations.
(5) No vessel shall enter an area of
drilling or blasting when they are
advised by the drilling barge or VTSNY
that a misfire or hang fire has occurred.
(6) Vessel Movement Reporting
System (VMRS) users are prohibited
from meeting or overtaking other vessels
when transiting alongside an active
work area where dredging and drilling
equipment are being operated.
(7) Each vessel transiting in the
vicinity of a work area where dredges
are located is required to do so at
reduced speed to maintain
maneuverability while minimizing the
effects of wake and surge.
(8) The VTSNY Director may impose
additional requirements through VTS
measures, as per 33 CFR 161.11.
(c) Effective Period. This rule is
effective from 8 a.m. on August 12, 2011
until 5 p.m. on April 1, 2014.
Dated: 12 Aug 2011.
J.B. McPherson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First
Coast Guard District, Acting.
[FR Doc. 2011–21460 Filed 8–22–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
2. Add § 165.T01–0727 to read as
follows:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
Technical Standards
rmajette on DSK89S0YB1PROD with RULES
■
§ 165.T01–0727 Regulated Navigation
Area; Arthur Kill, NY and NJ.
38 CFR Parts 3 and 20
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
(a) Regulated Area. The following area
is a regulated navigation area: all waters
of the North of Shooters Island Reach,
Elizabethport Reach, and Gulfport
Reach in the Arthur Kill; bounded in the
northeast by a line drawn from position
40° 38′48.637″ N, 074° 09′18.204″ W; to
a point in position 40°38′37.815″ N,
074° 09′20.245″ W; and bounded in the
southwest by a line drawn from position
40° 37′15.643″ N, 074° 12′15.927″ W; to
a point in position 40° 37′15.779″ N,
074° 12′08.0622″ W. All geographic
coordinates are North American Datum
of 1983 (NAD 83).
(b) Regulations.
(1) The general regulations contained
in 33 CFR 165.13 apply.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:22 Aug 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
RIN 2900–AO06
Rules Governing Hearings Before the
Agency of Original Jurisdiction and the
Board of Veterans’ Appeals;
Clarification
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) is amending its hearing
regulations to clarify that the provisions
regarding hearings before the Agency of
Original Jurisdiction (AOJ) do not apply
to hearings before the Board of Veterans’
Appeals (Board).
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective August 23, 2011.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23AUR1.SGM
23AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 23, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
rmajette on DSK89S0YB1PROD with RULES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura H. Eskenazi, Principal Deputy
Vice Chairman, Board of Veterans’
Appeals (012), Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461–8078.
(This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
document amends 38 CFR parts 3 and
20 to clarify existing hearing practices
and procedures before the AOJ and the
Board. Specifically, VA is amending
§ 3.103(a) and (c) to clarify that the
hearing procedures outlined in § 3.103
apply to hearings held before the AOJ
and not to hearings held before the
Board. VA is also amending § 20.706 to
further clarify that Board Members
presiding over a hearing on appeal are
not bound by the hearing procedures in
§ 3.103(c) and must conduct hearings in
accordance with part 20, subpart H,
which contains provisions governing
Board hearing practice and procedure.
In Appendix A to part 20, VA is
removing the cross references to § 3.103.
VA has determined these clarifying
changes are necessary because of a
recent decision by the United States
Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
(Court) in Bryant v. Shinseki, 23 Vet.
App. 488 (2010), that applied the
provisions of § 3.103(c)(2) to a Board
hearing. The Bryant Court held that the
provisions of § 3.103(c)(2) require a
‘‘Board hearing officer’’ to ‘‘fully explain
the issues still outstanding that are
relevant and material to substantiating
the claim’’ and to ‘‘suggest that a
claimant submit evidence on an issue
material to substantiating the claim
when the record is missing any
evidence on that issue or when the
testimony at the hearing raises an issue
for which there is no evidence in the
record.’’ Id. at 496–97. The Court
concluded with respect to one of the
service connection claims on appeal
that the Veteran had been prejudiced
because the presiding ‘‘Board hearing
officer’’ had not explained matters
material to the outcome of the claim and
had not suggested that the Veteran
could secure evidence regarding a nexus
between his current disability and
service. Id. at 499. The Court found
prejudice existed because evidence of a
nexus was not of record at the time of
the hearing and remained lacking at the
time of the decision. Id.
In reaching its conclusions, the Court
relied in part on its previous holding in
Douglas v. Derwinski, 2 Vet. App. 435
(1992), which held that the provisions
of § 3.103(c) applied to hearings before
the Board. Bryant, 23 Vet. App. at 494
(citing Douglas, 2 Vet. App. at 442). At
the time the Court decided Douglas, the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:22 Aug 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
Board’s Rules of Practice provided that
hearings on appeal could be held: ‘‘(a)
[b]efore a section of the Board of
Veterans’ Appeals in Washington, DC[;]
(b) * * * before a traveling section of
the Board of Veterans’ Appeals during
regularly scheduled visits to [VA]
facilities[;] [or] (c) [b]efore appropriate
personnel in the [VA] regional or other
office nearest the appellant’s residence,
acting as a hearing agency for the Board
of Veterans’ Appeals.’’ 38 CFR 19.160
(1991). Under the former rules, if an
appellant chose to have a hearing before
employees of the AOJ acting as a
hearing agency for the Board, then he or
she was not entitled to a subsequent
hearing before a Board Member. See id.;
see also Veterans Benefits
Administration, M21–1 Adjudication
Procedures Manual, § 18.17g (1991) (‘‘A
formal hearing on appeal at a regional
office will be in lieu of such a hearing
before the [Board], except in the
unusual case in which a special
appearance by the claimant before the
[Board], or the special attention of an
accredited organization’s headquarters
in Washington, DC, is requested by the
appellant.’’).
Not long after the Court decided
Douglas, the Board amended its hearing
regulations to terminate the practice of
AOJ personnel holding appellate
hearings on the Board’s behalf. The final
rulemaking noted that the Board was
implementing these changes because it
had decided ‘‘a clear demarcation
should exist between the conduct of
hearings by the Board and hearings
conducted by [Veterans Benefits
Administration] employees at regional
offices.’’ 58 FR 27934, 27934 (May 12,
1993). As a result of this procedural
modification, an appellant now has the
opportunity to appear for a hearing with
the AOJ at any time prior to when his
or her appeal is certified to the Board.
38 CFR 3.103(a); Your Rights to Appeal
Our Decision, VA Form 4107 (Sept.
2009). The appellant also has a right to
appear at a separate hearing on appeal
before a Board Member. 38 CFR
20.700(a); see VA Form 4107 (stating
that a hearing before the AOJ is separate
from any hearing an appellant may later
request before the Board); see also
Gambill v. Shinseki, 576 F.3d 1307,
1315, 1316 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (Bryson, J.,
concurring) (explaining that an
appellant has a right to appear at
hearings before the AOJ and the Board).
The 1993 regulatory changes reflected
VA’s intent to clearly distinguish
hearings before AOJs from hearings
before the Board, including the duties of
the respective VA personnel conducting
the hearing. As a result of these changes,
it has become standard VA practice and
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52573
procedure that hearings before AOJs are
governed by § 3.103 and hearings before
the Board are governed by relevant
provisions in part 20. The Court’s
holding in Bryant brought to light that
the pertinent regulations do not clearly
reflect VA’s intent. Therefore, VA has
decided to make clarifying changes to
§§ 3.103 and 20.706 to ensure that the
distinction between the duties of AOJ
hearing officers and Board Members
(also known as Veterans Law Judges
(VLJs), see § 19.2(b)) is clear on the face
of the pertinent regulations and will not
result in further confusion.
In part 3, VA is revising § 3.103(a) to
clarify that the provisions governing
hearings in § 3.103 only apply to
hearings conducted before the AOJ and
that the provisions in part 20 govern
hearings before the Board. VA is also
removing the following language from
§ 3.103(c)(1): ‘‘subject to the limitations
described in § 20.1304 of this chapter
with respect to hearings in claims which
have been certified to the Board of
Veterans Appeals for appellate review.’’
This language is not necessary since the
revision to paragraph (a) clarifies that
§ 3.103 does not apply to Board
hearings. VA is also revising paragraph
(c)(1) to change references to ‘‘original
determinative authority’’ to ‘‘VA office
having original jurisdiction’’. This
language is consistent with other
portions of § 3.103(c)(1).
In part 20, VA is amending § 20.706
to state that the conduct of hearings by
presiding Board Members or VLJs is
governed by subpart H of part 20 and
that Board Members are not bound by
the hearing provisions of § 3.103(c). In
Appendix A, VA is removing two cross
references to § 3.103 listed for §§ 20.1
and 20.1304 to ensure they do not cause
any confusion regarding the correct
applicability of § 3.103.
Administrative Procedure Act
This document merely clarifies
current procedures for obtaining and
conducting a hearing on a claim for VA
benefits before the VA agency of original
jurisdiction or the Board. It does not
create new procedure, and no
substantive change is intended.
Accordingly, this document is being
published as a final rule pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(A), which excepts
procedural rules from the APA’s noticeand-comment and delayed effective date
requirements.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains no provisions
constituting a collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501–3521).
E:\FR\FM\23AUR1.SGM
23AUR1
52574
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 23, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The initial and final regulatory
flexibility analysis requirements of
sections 603 and 604 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, are
not applicable to this rule because a
notice of proposed rulemaking is not
required for this rule. Even so, the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs hereby
certifies that this final rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. This
rule will affect only individual VA
beneficiaries and will not directly affect
small entities. Therefore, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 605(b), this final rule is exempt
from the initial and final regulatory
flexibility analysis requirements of
sections 603 and 604.
rmajette on DSK89S0YB1PROD with RULES
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review
Executive Order 12866 directs
agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and,
when regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity). The
Executive Order classifies a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ requiring review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) unless OMB waives such review,
as any regulatory action that is likely to
result in a rule that may: (1) Have an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more, or adversely affect in
a material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) create
a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action planned or
taken by another agency; (3) materially
alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof, or (4) raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in the Executive
Order.
VA has examined the economic,
interagency, legal, and policy
implications of this rulemaking and has
concluded that it is not a significant
regulatory action under the Executive
Order.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:22 Aug 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in an
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
given year. This rule would have no
such effect on State, local, and tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers and Titles
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance program numbers and titles
for this rule are 64.100, Automobiles
and Adaptive Equipment for Certain
Disabled Veterans and Members of the
Armed Forces; 64.101, Burial Expenses
Allowance for Veterans; 64.102,
Compensation for Service-Connected
Deaths for Veterans’ Dependents;
64.103, Life Insurance for Veterans;
64.104, Pension for Non-ServiceConnected Disability for Veterans;
64.105, Pension to Veterans Surviving
Spouses, and Children; 64.106,
Specially Adapted Housing for Disabled
Veterans; 64.109, Veterans
Compensation for Service-Connected
Disability; 64.110, Veterans Dependency
and Indemnity Compensation for
Service-Connected Death; 64.114,
Veterans Housing—Guaranteed and
Insured Loans; 64.115, Veterans
Information and Assistance; 64.116,
Vocational Rehabilitation for Disabled
Veterans; 64.117, Survivors and
Dependents Educational Assistance;
64.118, Veterans Housing—Direct Loans
for Certain Disabled Veterans; 64.119,
Veterans Housing—Manufactured Home
Loans; 64.120, Post-Vietnam Era
Veterans’ Educational Assistance;
64.124, All-Volunteer Force Educational
Assistance; 64.125, Vocational and
Educational Counseling for
Servicemembers and Veterans; 64.126,
Native American Veteran Direct Loan
Program; 64.127, Monthly Allowance
for Children of Vietnam Veterans Born
with Spina Bifida; and 64.128,
Vocational Training and Rehabilitation
for Vietnam Veterans’ Children with
Spina Bifida or Other Covered Birth
Defects.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or
designee, approved this document and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs. John
R. Gingrich, Chief of Staff, Department
of Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on August 16, 2011, for
publication.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
List of Subjects
38 CFR Part 3
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Disability benefits,
Health care, Pensions, Radioactive
materials, Veterans, Vietnam.
38 CFR Part 20
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Veterans.
Dated: August 18, 2011.
Robert C. McFetridge,
Director of Regulation Policy and
Management, Office of the General Counsel,
Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, VA amends 38 CFR parts 3
and 20 as follows:
PART 3—ADJUDICATION
Subpart A—Pension, Compensation,
and Dependency and Indemnity
Compensation
1. The authority citation for part 3,
subpart A continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), unless
otherwise noted.
2. Amend § 3.103 by:
a. Revising the last sentence of
paragraph (a) and adding a new
sentence after the last sentence.
■ b. Revising paragraph (c)(1).
The revisions read as follows:
■
■
§ 3.103 Procedural due process and
appellate rights.
(a) * * * The provisions of this
section apply to all claims for benefits
and relief, and decisions thereon, within
the purview of this part 3, except that
the provisions of this section governing
hearings apply only to hearings
conducted before the VA office having
original jurisdiction over the claim.
Hearings before the Board of Veterans’
Appeals are governed by part 20 of this
chapter.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * * (1) Upon request, a claimant
is entitled to a hearing at any time on
any issue involved in a claim within the
purview of part 3 of this chapter. VA
will provide the place of hearing in the
VA office having original jurisdiction
over the claim or at the VA office
nearest the claimant’s home having
adjudicative functions, or, subject to
available resources and solely at the
option of VA, at any other VA facility
or federal building at which suitable
hearing facilities are available. VA will
provide one or more employees of the
VA office having original jurisdiction
over the claim to conduct the hearing
and to be responsible for establishment
E:\FR\FM\23AUR1.SGM
23AUR1
52575
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 23, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
and preservation of the hearing record.
Hearings in connection with proposed
adverse actions and appeals shall be
held before one or more employees of
the VA office having original
jurisdiction over the claim who did not
participate in the proposed action or the
decision being appealed. All expenses
incurred by the claimant in connection
with the hearing are the responsibility
of the claimant.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 20—BOARD OF VETERANS’
APPEALS: RULES OF PRACTICE
3. The authority citation for part 20
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a) and as noted
in specific sections.
Subpart H—Hearings on Appeal
■
4. Revise § 20.706 to read as follows:
§ 20.706 Rule 706. Functions of the
presiding Member.
The presiding Member is responsible
for the conduct of the hearing, in
accordance with the provisions of
subpart H of this part, administering the
oath or affirmation, and ruling on
questions of procedure. The presiding
Member will assure that the course of
the hearing remains relevant to the
issue, or issues, on appeal and that there
is no cross-examination of the parties or
witnesses. The presiding Member will
take such steps as may be necessary to
maintain good order at hearings and
may terminate a hearing or direct that
the offending party leave the hearing if
an appellant, representative, or witness
persists in disruptive behavior. The
presiding Member is not bound by the
procedures described in § 3.103(c) of
this chapter, as those procedures only
apply to hearings before the agency of
original jurisdiction.
5. Amend APPENDIX A TO PART
20—CROSS-REFERENCES table by:
■ a. Removing entries ‘‘20.1’’; ‘‘38 CFR
3.103(a)’’; and ‘‘Statement of policy.’’.
■ b. Revising entry 20.1304 to read as
follows:
■
APPENDIX A TO PART 20—CROSSREFERENCES
Title of crossreferenced material
or comment
Sec.
Cross-reference
*
*
20.1304 .................................................
*
*
*
*
38 CFR 20.700–20.717 ......................................................................................
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2011–21513 Filed 8–22–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 63
RIN 2900–AN73
Health Care for Homeless Veterans
Program
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This final rule establishes
regulations for contracting with
community-based treatment facilities in
the Health Care for Homeless Veterans
(HCHV) program of the Department of
Veterans Affairs (VA). The HCHV
program assists certain homeless
veterans in obtaining treatment from
non-VA community-based providers.
The final rule formalizes VA’s policies
and procedures in connection with this
program and clarifies that veterans with
substance use disorders may qualify for
the program.
DATES: Effective Date: September 22,
2011.
rmajette on DSK89S0YB1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Hallett, Healthcare for Homeless
Veterans Manager, c/o Bedford VA
Medical Center, 200 Springs Road, Bldg.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:22 Aug 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
*
*
12, Bedford, MA 01730; (781) 687–3187
(this is not a toll free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
HCHV program is authorized by 38
U.S.C. 2031, under which VA may
provide outreach as well as ‘‘care,
treatment, and rehabilitative services
(directly or by contract in communitybased treatment facilities, including
halfway houses)’’ to ‘‘veterans suffering
from serious mental illness, including
veterans who are homeless.’’ One of
VA’s National priorities is a renewed
effort to end homelessness for veterans.
For this reason, we are establishing
regulations that are consistent with the
current administration of this program.
The primary mission of the HCHV
program is to use outreach efforts to
contact and engage veterans who are
homeless and suffering from serious
mental illness or a substance use
disorder. Many of the veterans for
whom the HCHV program is designed
have not previously used VA medical
services or been enrolled in the VA
health care system.
Through the HCHV program, VA
identifies homeless veterans with
serious mental illness and/or substance
use disorder, usually through medical
intervention, and offers communitybased care to those whose conditions
are determined, clinically, to be
managed sufficiently that the
individuals can participate in such care.
We have assisted homeless veterans
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
See also rehearings.
*
with substance use disorders through
this program because, based on our
practical understanding and experience,
the vast majority of homeless veterans
have substance use disorders. Treating
substance use as a mental disorder is
consistent with the generally accepted
‘‘disease model’’ of alcoholism and drug
addiction treatment, as well as the
modern use of medical intervention to
treat the condition. We believe that if a
substance use disorder is a contributing
cause of homelessness, then that
disorder is serious; therefore, it is
consistent to include such veterans in a
program designed for ‘‘veterans
suffering from serious mental illness,
including veterans who are homeless.’’
38 U.S.C. 2031(a).
Veterans who are identified and who
choose to participate in this form of care
as part of their treatment plan are then
referred by VA to an appropriate nonVA community-based provider. In some
cases, VA will continue to actively
medically manage the veteran’s
condition, while in other cases a VA
clinician may determine that a veteran
can be sufficiently managed through
utilization of non-medical resources,
such as 12-step programs.
To provide the community-based
care, the HCHV program contracts with
non-VA community-based providers,
such as halfway houses, to provide to
these veterans housing and mental
health and/or substance use disorder
E:\FR\FM\23AUR1.SGM
23AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 163 (Tuesday, August 23, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52572-52575]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21513]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Parts 3 and 20
RIN 2900-AO06
Rules Governing Hearings Before the Agency of Original
Jurisdiction and the Board of Veterans' Appeals; Clarification
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is amending its
hearing regulations to clarify that the provisions regarding hearings
before the Agency of Original Jurisdiction (AOJ) do not apply to
hearings before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board).
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective August 23, 2011.
[[Page 52573]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura H. Eskenazi, Principal Deputy
Vice Chairman, Board of Veterans' Appeals (012), Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461-8078.
(This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document amends 38 CFR parts 3 and 20
to clarify existing hearing practices and procedures before the AOJ and
the Board. Specifically, VA is amending Sec. 3.103(a) and (c) to
clarify that the hearing procedures outlined in Sec. 3.103 apply to
hearings held before the AOJ and not to hearings held before the Board.
VA is also amending Sec. 20.706 to further clarify that Board Members
presiding over a hearing on appeal are not bound by the hearing
procedures in Sec. 3.103(c) and must conduct hearings in accordance
with part 20, subpart H, which contains provisions governing Board
hearing practice and procedure. In Appendix A to part 20, VA is
removing the cross references to Sec. 3.103.
VA has determined these clarifying changes are necessary because of
a recent decision by the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans
Claims (Court) in Bryant v. Shinseki, 23 Vet. App. 488 (2010), that
applied the provisions of Sec. 3.103(c)(2) to a Board hearing. The
Bryant Court held that the provisions of Sec. 3.103(c)(2) require a
``Board hearing officer'' to ``fully explain the issues still
outstanding that are relevant and material to substantiating the
claim'' and to ``suggest that a claimant submit evidence on an issue
material to substantiating the claim when the record is missing any
evidence on that issue or when the testimony at the hearing raises an
issue for which there is no evidence in the record.'' Id. at 496-97.
The Court concluded with respect to one of the service connection
claims on appeal that the Veteran had been prejudiced because the
presiding ``Board hearing officer'' had not explained matters material
to the outcome of the claim and had not suggested that the Veteran
could secure evidence regarding a nexus between his current disability
and service. Id. at 499. The Court found prejudice existed because
evidence of a nexus was not of record at the time of the hearing and
remained lacking at the time of the decision. Id.
In reaching its conclusions, the Court relied in part on its
previous holding in Douglas v. Derwinski, 2 Vet. App. 435 (1992), which
held that the provisions of Sec. 3.103(c) applied to hearings before
the Board. Bryant, 23 Vet. App. at 494 (citing Douglas, 2 Vet. App. at
442). At the time the Court decided Douglas, the Board's Rules of
Practice provided that hearings on appeal could be held: ``(a) [b]efore
a section of the Board of Veterans' Appeals in Washington, DC[;] (b) *
* * before a traveling section of the Board of Veterans' Appeals during
regularly scheduled visits to [VA] facilities[;] [or] (c) [b]efore
appropriate personnel in the [VA] regional or other office nearest the
appellant's residence, acting as a hearing agency for the Board of
Veterans' Appeals.'' 38 CFR 19.160 (1991). Under the former rules, if
an appellant chose to have a hearing before employees of the AOJ acting
as a hearing agency for the Board, then he or she was not entitled to a
subsequent hearing before a Board Member. See id.; see also Veterans
Benefits Administration, M21-1 Adjudication Procedures Manual, Sec.
18.17g (1991) (``A formal hearing on appeal at a regional office will
be in lieu of such a hearing before the [Board], except in the unusual
case in which a special appearance by the claimant before the [Board],
or the special attention of an accredited organization's headquarters
in Washington, DC, is requested by the appellant.'').
Not long after the Court decided Douglas, the Board amended its
hearing regulations to terminate the practice of AOJ personnel holding
appellate hearings on the Board's behalf. The final rulemaking noted
that the Board was implementing these changes because it had decided
``a clear demarcation should exist between the conduct of hearings by
the Board and hearings conducted by [Veterans Benefits Administration]
employees at regional offices.'' 58 FR 27934, 27934 (May 12, 1993). As
a result of this procedural modification, an appellant now has the
opportunity to appear for a hearing with the AOJ at any time prior to
when his or her appeal is certified to the Board. 38 CFR 3.103(a); Your
Rights to Appeal Our Decision, VA Form 4107 (Sept. 2009). The appellant
also has a right to appear at a separate hearing on appeal before a
Board Member. 38 CFR 20.700(a); see VA Form 4107 (stating that a
hearing before the AOJ is separate from any hearing an appellant may
later request before the Board); see also Gambill v. Shinseki, 576 F.3d
1307, 1315, 1316 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (Bryson, J., concurring) (explaining
that an appellant has a right to appear at hearings before the AOJ and
the Board).
The 1993 regulatory changes reflected VA's intent to clearly
distinguish hearings before AOJs from hearings before the Board,
including the duties of the respective VA personnel conducting the
hearing. As a result of these changes, it has become standard VA
practice and procedure that hearings before AOJs are governed by Sec.
3.103 and hearings before the Board are governed by relevant provisions
in part 20. The Court's holding in Bryant brought to light that the
pertinent regulations do not clearly reflect VA's intent. Therefore, VA
has decided to make clarifying changes to Sec. Sec. 3.103 and 20.706
to ensure that the distinction between the duties of AOJ hearing
officers and Board Members (also known as Veterans Law Judges (VLJs),
see Sec. 19.2(b)) is clear on the face of the pertinent regulations
and will not result in further confusion.
In part 3, VA is revising Sec. 3.103(a) to clarify that the
provisions governing hearings in Sec. 3.103 only apply to hearings
conducted before the AOJ and that the provisions in part 20 govern
hearings before the Board. VA is also removing the following language
from Sec. 3.103(c)(1): ``subject to the limitations described in Sec.
20.1304 of this chapter with respect to hearings in claims which have
been certified to the Board of Veterans Appeals for appellate review.''
This language is not necessary since the revision to paragraph (a)
clarifies that Sec. 3.103 does not apply to Board hearings. VA is also
revising paragraph (c)(1) to change references to ``original
determinative authority'' to ``VA office having original
jurisdiction''. This language is consistent with other portions of
Sec. 3.103(c)(1).
In part 20, VA is amending Sec. 20.706 to state that the conduct
of hearings by presiding Board Members or VLJs is governed by subpart H
of part 20 and that Board Members are not bound by the hearing
provisions of Sec. 3.103(c). In Appendix A, VA is removing two cross
references to Sec. 3.103 listed for Sec. Sec. 20.1 and 20.1304 to
ensure they do not cause any confusion regarding the correct
applicability of Sec. 3.103.
Administrative Procedure Act
This document merely clarifies current procedures for obtaining and
conducting a hearing on a claim for VA benefits before the VA agency of
original jurisdiction or the Board. It does not create new procedure,
and no substantive change is intended. Accordingly, this document is
being published as a final rule pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A), which
excepts procedural rules from the APA's notice-and-comment and delayed
effective date requirements.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains no provisions constituting a collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521).
[[Page 52574]]
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements
of sections 603 and 604 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
601-612, are not applicable to this rule because a notice of proposed
rulemaking is not required for this rule. Even so, the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-
612. This rule will affect only individual VA beneficiaries and will
not directly affect small entities. Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
605(b), this final rule is exempt from the initial and final regulatory
flexibility analysis requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The Executive
Order classifies a ``significant regulatory action,'' requiring review
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) unless OMB waives such
review, as any regulatory action that is likely to result in a rule
that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or
more, or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action planned or taken by another agency; (3) materially alter
the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof, or (4)
raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President's priorities, or the principles set forth in the Executive
Order.
VA has examined the economic, interagency, legal, and policy
implications of this rulemaking and has concluded that it is not a
significant regulatory action under the Executive Order.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in an expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any given year. This rule would have no such effect on
State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers and Titles
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program numbers and
titles for this rule are 64.100, Automobiles and Adaptive Equipment for
Certain Disabled Veterans and Members of the Armed Forces; 64.101,
Burial Expenses Allowance for Veterans; 64.102, Compensation for
Service-Connected Deaths for Veterans' Dependents; 64.103, Life
Insurance for Veterans; 64.104, Pension for Non-Service-Connected
Disability for Veterans; 64.105, Pension to Veterans Surviving Spouses,
and Children; 64.106, Specially Adapted Housing for Disabled Veterans;
64.109, Veterans Compensation for Service-Connected Disability; 64.110,
Veterans Dependency and Indemnity Compensation for Service-Connected
Death; 64.114, Veterans Housing--Guaranteed and Insured Loans; 64.115,
Veterans Information and Assistance; 64.116, Vocational Rehabilitation
for Disabled Veterans; 64.117, Survivors and Dependents Educational
Assistance; 64.118, Veterans Housing--Direct Loans for Certain Disabled
Veterans; 64.119, Veterans Housing--Manufactured Home Loans; 64.120,
Post-Vietnam Era Veterans' Educational Assistance; 64.124, All-
Volunteer Force Educational Assistance; 64.125, Vocational and
Educational Counseling for Servicemembers and Veterans; 64.126, Native
American Veteran Direct Loan Program; 64.127, Monthly Allowance for
Children of Vietnam Veterans Born with Spina Bifida; and 64.128,
Vocational Training and Rehabilitation for Vietnam Veterans' Children
with Spina Bifida or Other Covered Birth Defects.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. John R.
Gingrich, Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on August 16, 2011, for publication.
List of Subjects
38 CFR Part 3
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Disability benefits,
Health care, Pensions, Radioactive materials, Veterans, Vietnam.
38 CFR Part 20
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Veterans.
Dated: August 18, 2011.
Robert C. McFetridge,
Director of Regulation Policy and Management, Office of the General
Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, VA amends 38 CFR parts 3
and 20 as follows:
PART 3--ADJUDICATION
Subpart A--Pension, Compensation, and Dependency and Indemnity
Compensation
0
1. The authority citation for part 3, subpart A continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), unless otherwise noted.
0
2. Amend Sec. 3.103 by:
0
a. Revising the last sentence of paragraph (a) and adding a new
sentence after the last sentence.
0
b. Revising paragraph (c)(1).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 3.103 Procedural due process and appellate rights.
(a) * * * The provisions of this section apply to all claims for
benefits and relief, and decisions thereon, within the purview of this
part 3, except that the provisions of this section governing hearings
apply only to hearings conducted before the VA office having original
jurisdiction over the claim. Hearings before the Board of Veterans'
Appeals are governed by part 20 of this chapter.
* * * * *
(c) * * * (1) Upon request, a claimant is entitled to a hearing at
any time on any issue involved in a claim within the purview of part 3
of this chapter. VA will provide the place of hearing in the VA office
having original jurisdiction over the claim or at the VA office nearest
the claimant's home having adjudicative functions, or, subject to
available resources and solely at the option of VA, at any other VA
facility or federal building at which suitable hearing facilities are
available. VA will provide one or more employees of the VA office
having original jurisdiction over the claim to conduct the hearing and
to be responsible for establishment
[[Page 52575]]
and preservation of the hearing record. Hearings in connection with
proposed adverse actions and appeals shall be held before one or more
employees of the VA office having original jurisdiction over the claim
who did not participate in the proposed action or the decision being
appealed. All expenses incurred by the claimant in connection with the
hearing are the responsibility of the claimant.
* * * * *
PART 20--BOARD OF VETERANS' APPEALS: RULES OF PRACTICE
0
3. The authority citation for part 20 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a) and as noted in specific sections.
Subpart H--Hearings on Appeal
0
4. Revise Sec. 20.706 to read as follows:
Sec. 20.706 Rule 706. Functions of the presiding Member.
The presiding Member is responsible for the conduct of the hearing,
in accordance with the provisions of subpart H of this part,
administering the oath or affirmation, and ruling on questions of
procedure. The presiding Member will assure that the course of the
hearing remains relevant to the issue, or issues, on appeal and that
there is no cross-examination of the parties or witnesses. The
presiding Member will take such steps as may be necessary to maintain
good order at hearings and may terminate a hearing or direct that the
offending party leave the hearing if an appellant, representative, or
witness persists in disruptive behavior. The presiding Member is not
bound by the procedures described in Sec. 3.103(c) of this chapter, as
those procedures only apply to hearings before the agency of original
jurisdiction.
0
5. Amend APPENDIX A TO PART 20--CROSS-REFERENCES table by:
0
a. Removing entries ``20.1''; ``38 CFR 3.103(a)''; and ``Statement of
policy.''.
0
b. Revising entry 20.1304 to read as follows:
APPENDIX A TO PART 20--CROSS-REFERENCES
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title of cross- referenced material
Sec. Cross-reference or comment
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
20.1304................................ 38 CFR 20.700-20.717........... See also rehearings.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2011-21513 Filed 8-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P