International Conference on Harmonisation; Guidance on E2F Development Safety Update Report; Availability, 52667-52668 [2011-21447]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 23, 2011 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. References
The following references have been
placed on display in the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852,
and may be seen by interested persons
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday. (FDA has verified the
Web site addresses but is not
responsible for any subsequent changes
to the Web site after this document
publishes in the Federal Register.)
1. Passel, J.S. and C. D’Vera, ‘‘U.S.
Population Projections: 2005–2050,’’ Pew
Research Center, Washington, DC, February
11, 2008, (https://pewhispanic.org/files/
reports/85.pdf).
2. CDC, ‘‘Prevalence of Overweight,
Obesity, and Extreme Obesity Among Adults:
United States, Trends 1976–80 Through
2005–2006,’’ December 2008, (https://
www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/overweight/
overweight_adult.pdf).
3. CDC, ‘‘Differences in Prevalence of
Obesity Among Black, White, and Hispanic
Adults—United States, 2006–2008,’’
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report,
58(27):740–744, July 17, 2009, (https://
www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/
mm5827a2.htm).
4. CDC, ‘‘Health Disparities Experienced by
Hispanics—United States,’’ Morbidity and
Mortality Weekly Report, 53(40):935–937,
October 15, 2004, (https://www.cdc.gov/
mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5340a1.htm).
5. National Heart, Lung and Blood
Institute, ‘‘Epidemiologic Research in
Hispanic Populations: Opportunities,
Barriers and Solutions,’’ December 3, 2003,
(https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/meetings/
workshops/hispanic.htm).
6. Information Resources, Inc., ‘‘Times &
Trends: Hispanic Consumers—Capturing
CPG Market Potential,’’ April 2008, (https://
www.symphonyiri.com/portals/0/articlePdfs/
TT_April_2008_Hispanic_Consumers.pdf).
7. Yang, S., M.G. Leff, D. McTague, et al.,
‘‘Multistate Surveillance for Food-Handling,
Preparation, and Consumption Behaviors
Associated With Foodborne Diseases: 1995
and 1996 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance
Systems Food-Safety Questions,’’ Morbidity
and Mortality Weekly Report, 47(SS–4):33–
54, September 11, 1998, (https://www.cdc.gov/
mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00054714.htm).
8. Lin, C.-T.J. and S.T. Yen, ‘‘Knowledge of
Dietary Fats Among U.S. Consumers,’’
Journal of the American Dietetic Association,
110(4):613–618, April 2010.
9. Marin, G., F. Sabogal, B.V. Marin, et al.,
‘‘Development of a Short Acculturation Scale
for Hispanics,’’ Hispanic Journal of
Behavioral Sciences, 9(2):183–205, 1987.
10. Satia-About, J., R.E. Patterson, M.L.
Neuhouser, et al., ‘‘Dietary Acculturation:
Applications to Nutrition Research and
Dietetics,’’ Journal of the American Dietetic
Association, 102(8):1105–1118, August 2002.
11. Lin, H., O.I. Bermudez, and K.L.
Tucker, ‘‘Dietary Patterns of Hispanic Elders
Are Associated With Acculturation and
Obesity,’’ Journal of Nutrition, 133:3651–
3657, 2003.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Aug 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
12. Otero-Sabogal, R., F. Sabogal, E.J.
´
Perez-Stable, et al., ‘‘Dietary Practices,
Alcohol Consumption, and Smoking
Behavior: Ethnic, Sex, and Acculturation
Differences,’’ Journal of National Cancer
Institute Monograph, 18:73–82, 1995.
13. Lara, M., C. Gamboa, M.I.
Kahramanian, et al., ‘‘Acculturation and
Latino Health in the United States: A Review
of the Literature and its Sociopolitical
Context,’’ Annual Review of Public Health,
26:367–397, 2005.
14. Winkleby, M.A., S.P. Fortmann, and B.
Rockhill, ‘‘Health-Related Risk Factors in a
Sample of Hispanics and Whites Matched on
Sociodemographic Characteristics: The
Stanford Five-City Project,’’ American
Journal of Epidemiology 137(12):1365–1375,
1993.
15. Byrd, T.L., H. Balcazar, and R.A.
Hummer, ‘‘Acculturation and Breast-Feeding
Intention and Practice in Hispanic Women
on the U.S.-Mexico Border,’’ Ethnicity &
Disease, 11(1):72–79, 2001.
16. Cobas, J.A., H. Balcazar, M.B. Benin, et
al., ‘‘Acculturation and Low-Birthweight
Infants Among Latino Women: A Reanalysis
of Hispanic Health and Nutrition
Examination Survey Data With Structural
Equation Models,’’ American Journal of
Public Health, 86(3):394–396, 1996.
17. Dixon, L.B., J. Sundquist, and M.
Winkleby, ‘‘Differences in Energy, Nutrient,
and Food Intakes in a U.S. Sample of
Mexican-American Women and Men:
Findings From the Third National Health and
Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994,’’
American Journal of Epidemiology,
152(6):548–557, 2000.
18. Khan, L.K., J. Sobal, and R. Martorell,
‘‘Acculturation, Socioeconomic Status, and
Obesity in Mexican Americans, Cuban
Americans, and Puerto Ricans,’’ International
Journal of Obesity, 21(2):91–96, 1997.
19. Markides, K.S., D.J. Lee, and L.A. Ray,
‘‘Acculturation and Hypertension in Mexican
Americans,’’ Ethnicity & Disease, 3:70–74,
1993.
20. Stern, M.P., C. Gonzalez, B.D. Mitchell,
et al., ‘‘Genetic and Environmental
Determinants of Type II Diabetes in Mexico
City and San Antonio,’’ Diabetes, 41(4):484–
492, 1992.
21. Sundquist, J., and M.A. Winkleby,
‘‘Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Mexican
American Adults: A Transcultural Analysis
of National Health and Nutrition
Examination Survey III, 1988–1994,’’
American Journal of Public Health,
89(5):723–730, 1999.
22. Thomson, M.D., and L. Hoffman-Goetz,
‘‘Defining and Measuring Acculturation: A
Systematic Review of Public Health Studies
With Hispanic Population in the United
States,’’ Social Science & Medicine, 69:983–
991, 2009.
Dated: August 18, 2011.
David Dorsey,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. 2011–21485 Filed 8–22–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52667
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2008–D–0386]
International Conference on
Harmonisation; Guidance on E2F
Development Safety Update Report;
Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a guidance entitled ‘‘E2F
Development Safety Update Report.’’
The guidance was prepared under the
auspices of the International Conference
on Harmonisation of Technical
Requirements for Registration of
Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH).
The guidance describes the format,
content, and timing of a development
safety update report (DSUR) for an
investigational drug. The DSUR will
serve as a common standard for periodic
reporting on drugs under development
(including marketed drugs that are
under further study) among the ICH
regions. The DSUR can be submitted in
the United States in place of an annual
report for an investigational new drug
application (IND). The harmonized
DSUR is intended to promote a
consistent approach to annual clinical
safety reporting among the ICH regions
and enhance efficiency by reducing the
number of reports generated for
submission to the regulatory authorities.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments on Agency guidances
at any time.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for
single copies of the guidance to the
Division of Drug Information, Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 2201,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, or the
Office of Communication, Outreach and
Development (HFM–40), Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research,
Food and Drug Administration, 1401
Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852–
1448. Send one self-addressed adhesive
label to assist the office in processing
your requests. The guidance may also be
obtained by mail by calling the Center
for Biologics Evaluation and Research at
1–800–835–4709 or 301–827–1800. See
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for electronic access to the guidance
document.
Submit electronic comments on the
guidance to https://www.regulations.gov.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM
23AUN1
52668
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 23, 2011 / Notices
Submit written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regarding the guidance: Ellis F. Unger,
Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 22, rm. 4208, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–2270; or
Peter F. Bross, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research (HFM–755),
Food and Drug Administration, 1401
Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852,
301–827–5102.
Regarding the ICH: Michelle Limoli,
Office of International Programs, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31, rm. 3506,
Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301–796–
8377.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Background
In recent years, many important
initiatives have been undertaken by
regulatory authorities and industry
associations to promote international
harmonization of regulatory
requirements. FDA has participated in
many meetings designed to enhance
harmonization and is committed to
seeking scientifically based harmonized
technical procedures for pharmaceutical
development. One of the goals of
harmonization is to identify and then
reduce differences in technical
requirements for drug development
among regulatory agencies.
ICH was organized to provide an
opportunity for tripartite harmonization
initiatives to be developed with input
from both regulatory and industry
representatives. FDA also seeks input
from consumer representatives and
others. ICH is concerned with
harmonization of technical
requirements for the registration of
pharmaceutical products among three
regions: The European Union, Japan,
and the United States. The six ICH
sponsors are the European Commission;
the European Federation of
Pharmaceutical Industries Associations;
the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour,
and Welfare; the Japanese
Pharmaceutical Manufacturers
Association; the Centers for Drug
Evaluation and Research and Biologics
Evaluation and Research, FDA; and the
Pharmaceutical Research and
Manufacturers of America. The ICH
Secretariat, which coordinates the
preparation of documentation, is
provided by the International
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Aug 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
Federation of Pharmaceutical
Manufacturers Associations (IFPMA).
The ICH Steering Committee includes
representatives from each of the ICH
sponsors and the IFPMA, as well as
observers from the World Health
Organization, Health Canada, and the
European Free Trade Area.
In the Federal Register of August 5,
2008 (73 FR 45462), FDA published a
notice announcing the availability of a
draft guidance entitled ‘‘E2F
Development Safety Update Report.’’
The notice gave interested persons an
opportunity to submit comments by
November 3, 2008.
After consideration of the comments
received and revisions to the guidance,
a final draft of the guidance was
submitted to the ICH Steering
Committee and endorsed by the three
participating regulatory agencies in
August 2010.
The guidance describes the format,
content, and timing of a DSUR for an
investigational drug. The DSUR will
serve as a common standard for periodic
reporting on drugs under development
(including marketed drugs that are
under further study) among the ICH
regions. The DSUR is patterned after the
periodic safety update report (used for
safety reporting in the postmarketing
environment) and can be submitted in
the United States in place of an annual
report for an IND. The harmonized
DSUR is intended to promote a
consistent approach to annual clinical
safety reporting among the ICH regions
and enhance efficiency by reducing the
number of reports generated for
submission to the regulatory authorities.
This guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The guidance represents the Agency’s
current thinking on this topic. It does
not create or confer any rights for or on
any person and does not operate to bind
FDA or the public. An alternative
approach may be used if such approach
satisfies the requirements of the
applicable statutes and regulations.
II. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written
comments regarding this document. It is
only necessary to send one set of
comments. It is no longer necessary to
send two copies of mailed comments.
Identify comments with the docket
number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the document at https://www.
regulations.gov, https://www.fda.gov/
Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatory
Information/Guidances/default.htm, or
https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBlood
Vaccines/GuidanceCompliance
RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/
default.htm.
Dated: August 16, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011–21447 Filed 8–22–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0002]
Vaccines and Related Biological
Products Advisory Committee;
Amendment of Notice
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) is announcing an amendment to
the notice of meeting of the Vaccines
and Related Biological Products
Advisory Committee. This meeting was
announced in the Federal Register of
July 22, 2011 (76 FR 44016). The
amendment is being made to reflect a
change in the Date and Time, Location,
Agenda, Procedure, and Closed
Committee Deliberations portions of the
document. There are no other changes.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donald W. Jehn or Denise Royster,
Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research (HFM–71), Food and Drug
Administration, 1401 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, MD 20852, 301–827–0314, or
FDA Advisory Committee Information
Line, 1–800–741–8138 (301–443–0572
in the Washington DC area), and follow
the prompts to the desired center or
product area. Please call the Information
Line for up-to-date information on this
meeting.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
Federal Register of July 22, 2011, FDA
announced that a meeting of the
Vaccines and Related Biological
Products Advisory Committee would be
held on September 20, 2011. On page
44016, in the 2nd and 3rd column and
on page 44017, in the 1st column, the
Date and Time, Location, Agenda,
Procedure, and Closed Committee
Deliberations portions of the document
are changed to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM
23AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 163 (Tuesday, August 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52667-52668]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21447]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2008-D-0386]
International Conference on Harmonisation; Guidance on E2F
Development Safety Update Report; Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a guidance entitled ``E2F Development Safety Update
Report.'' The guidance was prepared under the auspices of the
International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for
Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). The guidance
describes the format, content, and timing of a development safety
update report (DSUR) for an investigational drug. The DSUR will serve
as a common standard for periodic reporting on drugs under development
(including marketed drugs that are under further study) among the ICH
regions. The DSUR can be submitted in the United States in place of an
annual report for an investigational new drug application (IND). The
harmonized DSUR is intended to promote a consistent approach to annual
clinical safety reporting among the ICH regions and enhance efficiency
by reducing the number of reports generated for submission to the
regulatory authorities.
DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on Agency guidances
at any time.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the guidance to
the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
51, rm. 2201, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, or the Office of
Communication, Outreach and Development (HFM-40), Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 1401 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, MD 20852-1448. Send one self-addressed adhesive label
to assist the office in processing your requests. The guidance may also
be obtained by mail by calling the Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research at 1-800-835-4709 or 301-827-1800. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic access to the guidance document.
Submit electronic comments on the guidance to https://www.regulations.gov.
[[Page 52668]]
Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Regarding the guidance: Ellis F.
Unger, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 22, rm. 4208, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-2270; or Peter F. Bross, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research (HFM-755), Food and Drug
Administration, 1401 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-827-5102.
Regarding the ICH: Michelle Limoli, Office of International
Programs, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
31, rm. 3506, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-8377.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In recent years, many important initiatives have been undertaken by
regulatory authorities and industry associations to promote
international harmonization of regulatory requirements. FDA has
participated in many meetings designed to enhance harmonization and is
committed to seeking scientifically based harmonized technical
procedures for pharmaceutical development. One of the goals of
harmonization is to identify and then reduce differences in technical
requirements for drug development among regulatory agencies.
ICH was organized to provide an opportunity for tripartite
harmonization initiatives to be developed with input from both
regulatory and industry representatives. FDA also seeks input from
consumer representatives and others. ICH is concerned with
harmonization of technical requirements for the registration of
pharmaceutical products among three regions: The European Union, Japan,
and the United States. The six ICH sponsors are the European
Commission; the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries
Associations; the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare; the
Japanese Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association; the Centers for Drug
Evaluation and Research and Biologics Evaluation and Research, FDA; and
the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. The ICH
Secretariat, which coordinates the preparation of documentation, is
provided by the International Federation of Pharmaceutical
Manufacturers Associations (IFPMA).
The ICH Steering Committee includes representatives from each of
the ICH sponsors and the IFPMA, as well as observers from the World
Health Organization, Health Canada, and the European Free Trade Area.
In the Federal Register of August 5, 2008 (73 FR 45462), FDA
published a notice announcing the availability of a draft guidance
entitled ``E2F Development Safety Update Report.'' The notice gave
interested persons an opportunity to submit comments by November 3,
2008.
After consideration of the comments received and revisions to the
guidance, a final draft of the guidance was submitted to the ICH
Steering Committee and endorsed by the three participating regulatory
agencies in August 2010.
The guidance describes the format, content, and timing of a DSUR
for an investigational drug. The DSUR will serve as a common standard
for periodic reporting on drugs under development (including marketed
drugs that are under further study) among the ICH regions. The DSUR is
patterned after the periodic safety update report (used for safety
reporting in the postmarketing environment) and can be submitted in the
United States in place of an annual report for an IND. The harmonized
DSUR is intended to promote a consistent approach to annual clinical
safety reporting among the ICH regions and enhance efficiency by
reducing the number of reports generated for submission to the
regulatory authorities.
This guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The guidance represents the
Agency's current thinking on this topic. It does not create or confer
any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the
public. An alternative approach may be used if such approach satisfies
the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.
II. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments regarding this
document. It is only necessary to send one set of comments. It is no
longer necessary to send two copies of mailed comments. Identify
comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at
https://www.regulations.gov, https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm, or
https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm.
Dated: August 16, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-21447 Filed 8-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P