Establishment of Class E Airspace; Forest, VA, 52230-52231 [2011-21284]
Download as PDF
52230
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 162 / Monday, August 22, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9U,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 18, 2010, and
effective September 15, 2010, is
amended as follows:
■
History
On June 13, 2011, the FAA published
in the Federal Register a notice of
proposed rulemaking to establish Class
E airspace at Forest, VA (76 FR 34196)
Docket No. FAA–2011–0378. Interested
parties were invited to participate in
this rulemaking effort by submitting
written comments on the proposal to the
FAA. No comments were received. Class
E airspace designations are published in
paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9U
dated August 18, 2010, and effective
September 15, 2010, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designations
listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order.
Paragraph 2006 United States Area
Navigation Routes
*
*
*
*
*
Q–37 FST, TX to PUB, CO [New]
FST VORTAC
(Lat. 30°57′08″ N., long. 102°58′33″ W.)
CAVRN Fix
(Lat. 31°49′31″ N., long. 104°00′42″ W.)
YORUB WP
(Lat. 32°55′52″ N., long. 104°14′01″ W.)
IMMAS Fix
(Lat. 34°54′18″ N., long. 104°18′53″ W.)
PUB VORTAC
(Lat. 38°17′39″ N., long. 104°25′46″ W.)
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 15,
2011.
Gary A. Norek,
Acting Manager, Airspace, Regulations and
ATC Procedures Group.
[FR Doc. 2011–21290 Filed 8–19–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0378; Airspace
Docket No. 11–AEA–11]
Establishment of Class E Airspace;
Forest, VA
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
This action establishes Class
E Airspace at Forest, VA, to
accommodate the new Area Navigation
(RNAV) Global Positioning System
(GPS) Standard Instrument Approach
Procedures serving New London
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:10 Aug 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
Airport. This action enhances the safety
and airspace management of Instrument
Flight Rules (IFR) operations within the
National Airspace System.
DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, October 20,
2011. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by
reference action under title 1, Code of
Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to
the annual revision of FAA Order
7400.9 and publication of conforming
amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Fornito, Operations Support Group,
Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation
Administration, P.O. Box 20636,
Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404)
305–6364.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Rule
This amendment to Title 14, Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71
establishes the Class E airspace
extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface at Forest, VA, to provide the
controlled airspace required to support
the new RNAV GPS standard
instrument approach procedures
developed for New London Airport.
This action is necessary for the safety
and management of IFR operations at
the airport.
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current, is non-controversial and
unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore, (1) is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it
is certified that this rule, when
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section
40103. Under that section, the FAA is
charged with prescribing regulations to
assign the use of airspace necessary to
ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority as
it establishes controlled airspace at New
London Airport, Forest, VA.
Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (Air).
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9U,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 18, 2010, effective
September 15, 2010, is amended as
follows:
■
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward from 700 feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth
*
*
*
*
*
AEA VA E5 Forest, VA [New]
New London Airport, VA
(Lat. 37°16′18″ N., long. 79°20′9″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 8.4-mile
radius of the New London Airport, and
within 2 miles either side of the 347° bearing
from the airport extending from the 8.4-mile
radius to 12.1 miles northwest of the airport.
E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM
22AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 162 / Monday, August 22, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Issued in College Park, Georgia, on August
9, 2011.
Mark D. Ward,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern
Service Center, Air Traffic Organization.
SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone
202–267–3073; e-mail
Paul.G.Greer@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2011–21284 Filed 8–19–11; 8:45 am]
Authority for This Rulemaking
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
The FAA’s authority to issue rules on
aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the
United States Code. Subtitle I, section
106 describes the authority of the FAA
Administrator, to include the authority
to issue, rescind, and revise regulations.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in subtitle VII, part A, chapter
447, Safety Regulation. Under section
44701(a) the FAA is charged with
promoting the safe flight of civil aircraft
in air commerce by prescribing
regulations and minimum standards for
other practices, methods, and
procedures necessary for safety in air
commerce and national security.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Parts 91, 119, 125, 133, 137,
141, 142, 145, and 147
[Docket No. FAA–2008–1154; Amendment
Nos. 91–325, 119–5, 125–61, 133–14, 137–
16, 141–16, 142–8, 145–29, and 147–7]
RIN 2120–AJ36
Restrictions on Operators Employing
Former Flight Standards Service
Aviation Safety Inspectors
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
I. Background
This rule will prohibit any
person holding a certificate from
knowingly employing, or making a
contractual arrangement with, certain
individuals to act as an agent or a
representative of the certificate holder
in any matter before the FAA under
certain conditions. These restrictions
will apply if the individual, in the
preceding 2-year period directly served
as, or was directly responsible for the
oversight of, a Flight Standards Service
Aviation Safety Inspector, and had
direct responsibility to inspect, or
oversee the inspection of, the operations
of the certificate holder. This rule will
also apply to persons who own or
manage fractional ownership program
aircraft that are used to conduct
operations under specific regulations
described in this document. This rule
will establish these restrictions to
prevent potential organizational
conflicts of interest which could
adversely affect aviation safety.
DATES: Effective Date: This amendment
becomes effective October 21, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical questions concerning this final
rule, contact Nancy Lauck Claussen,
Federal Aviation Administration, Air
Transportation Division, AFS–200, 800
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202)
267–8166; e-mail
Nancy.L.Claussen@faa.gov. For legal
questions concerning this final rule,
contact Paul G. Greer, Federal Aviation
Administration, Office of the Chief
Counsel, 800 Independence Avenue,
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:10 Aug 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
On March 5, 2008, the FAA proposed
a $10.2 million civil penalty against a
major airline for operating 46 airplanes
without performing mandatory
inspections for fuselage fatigue cracking.
The FAA alleged that the airline
operated 46 Boeing 737 airplanes on
almost 60,000 flights from June 2006 to
March 2007 while failing to comply
with an existing FAA Airworthiness
Directive (AD) that required repetitive
inspections of certain fuselage areas to
detect fatigue cracking.
Based on this event, on June 30, 2008,
the Department of Transportation (DOT)
Office of Inspector General issued a
report on its review of the FAA’s
oversight of airlines and use of
regulatory partnership programs. The
report concluded that the FAA
Certificate Management Office (CMO)
overseeing the airline that failed to
perform the required inspections had
developed an overly collaborative
relationship with the airline. The report
recommended that the FAA should
enhance management controls by
implementing post-employment
guidance that includes a ‘‘cooling-off’’
period to prohibit an air carrier from
hiring an FAA Flight Standards Service
Aviation Safety Inspector (AFS ASI)
who previously inspected that air
carrier from acting in any type of liaison
capacity between it and the FAA. A full
copy of the report is contained in the
docket for this rulemaking.
On September 2, 2008, an
independent review team, appointed by
former Secretary of Transportation Mary
E. Peters on May 1, 2008 to examine the
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52231
FAA’s safety culture and its
implementation of safety management
systems, issued its report titled,
‘‘Managing Risks in Civil Aviation: A
Review of the FAA’s Approach to
Safety.’’ The report stated that ‘‘[t]he
FAA, like all other regulators, faces the
danger of regulatory capture. Capture
occurs when a regulatory agency draws
so close to those with whom it deals on
a daily basis (i.e. the regulated) that the
agency ends up elevating their concerns
at the expense of the agency’s core
mission.’’ A full copy of the report may
be found in the docket for this
rulemaking.
A. Summary of the NPRM
The NPRM was published in the
Federal Register on November 20, 2009
(74 FR 60218) and the comment period
closed on February 18, 2010. The NPRM
proposed to prohibit any person holding
a certificate to conduct operations under
parts 121, 125, 133, 135, 137, 141, 142,
145 or 147 from knowingly employing,
or making a contractual arrangement
with, certain individuals to act as an
agent or a representative of the
certificate holder in any matter before
the FAA under certain conditions.
These restrictions would apply if the
individual, in the preceding 2-year
period: (1) Directly served as, or was
directly responsible for the oversight of,
an AFS ASI; and (2) had direct
responsibility to inspect, or oversee the
inspection of, the operations of the
certificate holder. The NPRM also
proposed to apply to persons who own
or manage fractional ownership program
aircraft that are used to conduct
operations under subpart K of part 91.
The FAA proposed to establish these
restrictions to prevent potential
organizational conflicts of interest
which could adversely affect aviation
safety.
B. Discussion of the Comments
The FAA received five comments on
the proposed rule, all from individual
commenters. The FAA did not receive
comments from airlines, trade
associations, or labor organizations. The
three adverse comments addressed the
applicability of the rule, and the
potential burdens the rule could create.
Two comments expressed support for
the rule. Commenters also suggested
changes, as discussed more fully in this
section.
1. Applicability of Employment
Prohibition to Additional FAA
Employees
Two individual commenters stated
that the provisions in the proposed rule
should be expanded to include FAA
E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM
22AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 162 (Monday, August 22, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52230-52231]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21284]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA-2011-0378; Airspace Docket No. 11-AEA-11]
Establishment of Class E Airspace; Forest, VA
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action establishes Class E Airspace at Forest, VA, to
accommodate the new Area Navigation (RNAV) Global Positioning System
(GPS) Standard Instrument Approach Procedures serving New London
Airport. This action enhances the safety and airspace management of
Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations within the National Airspace
System.
DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, October 20, 2011. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O.
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-6364.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
History
On June 13, 2011, the FAA published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking to establish Class E airspace at Forest,
VA (76 FR 34196) Docket No. FAA-2011-0378. Interested parties were
invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written
comments on the proposal to the FAA. No comments were received. Class E
airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of FAA Order
7400.9U dated August 18, 2010, and effective September 15, 2010, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace
designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in
the Order.
The Rule
This amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 establishes the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface at Forest, VA, to provide the controlled airspace
required to support the new RNAV GPS standard instrument approach
procedures developed for New London Airport. This action is necessary
for the safety and management of IFR operations at the airport.
The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore, (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it establishes controlled airspace at New London Airport, Forest,
VA.
Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air).
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.
Sec. 71.1 [Amended]
0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9U, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 18, 2010, effective September 15, 2010, is amended
as follows:
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward from 700
feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth
* * * * *
AEA VA E5 Forest, VA [New]
New London Airport, VA
(Lat. 37[deg]16'18'' N., long. 79[deg]20'9'' W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 8.4-mile radius of the New London Airport, and within 2
miles either side of the 347[deg] bearing from the airport extending
from the 8.4-mile radius to 12.1 miles northwest of the airport.
[[Page 52231]]
Issued in College Park, Georgia, on August 9, 2011.
Mark D. Ward,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2011-21284 Filed 8-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P