WTO Dispute Settlement Proceeding Regarding United States-Anti-Dumping Measures on Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From China, 52045-52046 [2011-21235]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 161 / Friday, August 19, 2011 / Notices
be provided to any person subject to this
determination who might have a
constitutional presence in the United
States, because to do so would render
ineffectual the measures authorized in
the Order.
This notice shall be published in the
Federal Register.
Dated: August 3, 2011.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
[Dispute No. WTO/DS422]
WTO Dispute Settlement Proceeding
Regarding United States—AntiDumping Measures on Diamond
Sawblades and Parts Thereof From
China
Office of the United States
Trade Representative.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
AGENCY:
[FR Doc. 2011–21268 Filed 8–18–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–10–P
The Office of the United
States Trade Representative (‘‘USTR’’) is
providing notice that on July 22, 2011,
the People’s Republic of China
requested consultations with the United
States under the Marrakesh Agreement
Establishing the World Trade
Organization (‘‘WTO Agreement’’)
concerning anti-dumping measures
regarding diamond sawblades and parts
thereof from China. That request may be
found at https://www.wto.org contained
in a document designated as WT/
DS422/1/Add.1. USTR invites written
comments from the public concerning
the issues raised in China’s July 22,
2011 consultation request.
DATES: Although USTR will accept any
comments received during the course of
the dispute settlement proceedings,
comments should be submitted on or
before September 19, 2011, to be
assured of timely consideration by
USTR.
ADDRESSES: Public comments should be
submitted electronically to https://
www.regulations.gov, docket number
USTR–2011–0002. If you are unable to
provide submissions by https://
www.regulations.gov, please contact
Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395–9483 to
arrange for an alternative method of
transmission.
If (as explained below) the comment
contains confidential information, then
the comment should be submitted by
fax only to Sandy McKinzy at (202)
395–3640.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jared Wessel, Assistant General
Counsel, Office of the United States
Trade Representative, 600 17th Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20508, (202) 395–
3150.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: USTR is
providing notice that consultations have
been requested pursuant to the WTO
Understanding on Rules and Procedures
Governing the Settlement of Disputes
(‘‘DSU’’). If such consultations should
fail to resolve the matter and a dispute
settlement panel is established pursuant
to the DSU, such panel, which would
hold its meetings in Geneva,
SUMMARY:
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice: 7561]
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Determination on Imposition and
Waiver of Sanctions Under Sections
603 and 604 of the Foreign Relations
Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003
(Pub. L. 107–228)
Consistent with the authority
contained in section 604 of the Foreign
Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Year
2003 (Pub. L. 107–228) (the ‘‘Act’’), the
Delegation of Authority in the April 30,
2009, Memorandum for the Secretary of
State, and Department of State
Delegation of Authority No. 245–1, and
with reference to the determinations set
out in the Report to the Congress
transmitted pursuant to section 603 of
that Act, regarding the extent of
noncompliance by the Palestine
Liberation Organization (PLO) or
Palestinian Authority with certain
commitments, I hereby impose the
sanction set out in section 604(a)(2),
‘‘Downgrade in Status of the PLO Office
in the United States.’’ This sanction is
imposed for a period of 180 days from
the date that the report under section
603 of the Act is transmitted to the
Congress or until such time as the next
report under section 603 is required to
be transmitted to the Congress,
whichever is later.
Furthermore, I hereby determine that
it is in the national security interest of
the United States to waive that sanction,
pursuant to section 604(c) of the Act.
This waiver shall be effective for a
period of 180 days from the date hereof
or until such time as the next report
under section 603 of the Act is required
to be transmitted to Congress,
whichever is later.
This determination shall be reported
to Congress promptly and published in
the Federal Register.
Dated: August 10, 2011.
William J. Burns,
Deputy Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2011–21270 Filed 8–18–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–31–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:32 Aug 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52045
Switzerland, would be expected to issue
a report on its findings and
recommendations within nine months
after it is established.
Major Issues Raised by China
On July 22, 2011, China requested
consultations regarding the
antidumping duty investigation
conducted by the Department of
Commerce on diamond sawblades and
parts thereof from China, referring in
particular to the use of what it calls
‘‘zeroing’’ in that proceeding.
Specifically, China requested
consultations regarding the
determination by the Department of
Commerce in (1) Final Determination of
Sales at Less than Fair Value and Final
Partial Affirmative Determination of
Critical Circumstances: Diamond
Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the
People’s Republic of China, 71 FR 29303
(May 22, 2006) and the accompanying
May 15, 2006, Issues and Decision
Memorandum, as well as any
amendments, replacements and/or
implementing measures issued pursuant
thereto; and (2) Diamond Sawblades
and Parts Thereof from the People’s
Republic of China and Republic of
Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders, 74 FR
57145 (November 4, 2009), as well as
any amendments, replacements and/or
implementing measures issued pursuant
thereto.
China asserts that the present request
for consultations constitutes an
addendum to, and must be read together
with, its consultation request dated
February 28, 2001 regarding antidumping measures on certain frozen
warmwater shrimp from China, WTO/
DS422/1. (See WTO Dispute Settlement
Proceeding Regarding United States—
Anti-Dumping Measures on Certain
Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From China,
76 FR 17985 (March 31, 2011)).
China alleges that so-called zeroing is
inconsistent with Articles VI:1 and VI:2
of the General Agreement on Tariffs and
Trade 1994 and Articles 1, 2.1, 2.4,
2.4.2, 5.8, 9.2, 9.3, and 9.4 of the
Agreement on Implementation of Article
VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs
and Trade 1994.
Public Comment: Requirements for
Submissions
Interested persons are invited to
submit written comments concerning
the issues raised in this dispute. Persons
may submit public comments
electronically to https://
www.regulations.gov docket number
USTR–2011–0002. If you are unable to
provide submissions by https://
www.regulations.gov, please contact
Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395–9483 to
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
52046
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 161 / Friday, August 19, 2011 / Notices
arrange for an alternative method of
transmission.
To submit comments via https://
www.regulations.gov, enter docket
number USTR–2011–0002 on the home
page and click ‘‘search’’. The site will
provide a search-results page listing all
documents associated with this docket.
Find a reference to this notice by
selecting ‘‘Notice’’ under ‘‘Document
Type’’ on the left side of the searchresults page, and click on the link
entitled ‘‘Submit a Comment.’’
(For further information on using the
https://www.regulations.gov Web site,
please consult the resources provided
on the Web site by clicking on ‘‘How to
Use This Site’’ on the left side of the
home page.)
The https://www.regulations.gov site
provides the option of providing
comments by filling in a ‘‘Type
Comment and Upload File’’ field, or by
attaching a document. It is expected that
most comments will be provided in an
attached document. If a document is
attached, it is sufficient to type ‘‘See
attached’’ in the ‘‘Type Comment and
Upload File’’ field.
A person requesting that information
contained in a comment submitted by
that person be treated as confidential
business information must certify that
such information is business
confidential and would not customarily
be released to the public by the
submitter. Confidential business
information must be clearly designated
as such and the submission must be
marked ‘‘BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL’’
at the top and bottom of the cover page
and each succeeding page. Any
comment containing business
confidential information must be
submitted by fax to Sandy McKinzy at
(202) 395–3640. A non-confidential
summary of the confidential
information must be submitted to
https://www.regulations.gov. The nonconfidential summary will be placed in
the docket and open to public
inspection.
Information or advice contained in a
comment submitted, other than business
confidential information, may be
determined by USTR to be confidential
in accordance with section 135(g)(2) of
the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C.
2155(g)(2)). If the submitter believes that
information or advice may qualify as
such, the submitter—
(1) Must clearly so designate the
information or advice;
(2) Must clearly mark the material as
‘‘SUBMITTED IN CONFIDENCE’’ at the
top and bottom of the cover page and
each succeeding page; and
(3) Must provide a non-confidential
summary of the information or advice.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:32 Aug 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
Any comment containing confidential
information must be submitted by fax. A
non-confidential summary of the
confidential information must be
submitted to https://
www.regulations.gov. The nonconfidential summary will be placed in
the docket and open to public
inspection.
Pursuant to section 127(e) of the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act (19
U.S.C. 3537(e)), USTR will maintain a
docket on this dispute settlement
proceeding accessible to the public at
https://www.regulations.gov, docket
number USTR–2011–0002. The public
file will include non-confidential
comments received by USTR from the
public with respect to the dispute. If a
dispute settlement panel is convened or
in the event of an appeal from such a
panel, the U.S. submissions, any nonconfidential submissions, or nonconfidential summaries of submissions,
received from other participants in the
dispute, will be made available to the
public on USTR’s Web site at https://
www.ustr.gov, and the report of the
panel, and, if applicable, the report of
the Appellate Body, will be available on
the Web site of the World Trade
Organization, https://www.wto.org.
Comments open to public inspection
may be viewed on the https://
www.regulations.gov Web site.
William Busis,
Deputy Assistant United States Trade
Representative for Monitoring and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2011–21235 Filed 8–18–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190–W1–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
[Docket No: FTA–2009–0052]
Final Policy Statement on the Eligibility
of Pedestrian and Bicycle
Improvements Under Federal Transit
Law
Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Final policy statement.
AGENCY:
The Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) hereby
establishes a formal policy on the
eligibility of pedestrian and bicycle
improvements for FTA funding and
defines the catchment area for
pedestrians and bicyclists in relation to
public transportation stops and stations.
DATES: Effective Date: The effective date
of this final policy statement is August
19, 2011.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Availability of the Final
Policy Statement and Comments: One
may access this final policy statement,
the proposed policy statement, and
public comments on the proposed
policy statement at docket number
FTA–2009–0052. For access to the
docket, please visit https://www.
regulations.gov or the Docket
Operations office located in the West
Building of the United States
Department of Transportation, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m. Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jayme L. Blakesley at jayme.blakesley@
dot.gov or Matthew Lesh at matthew.
lesh@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Introduction
The purpose of this notice is to
simplify the process for determining
whether a pedestrian or bicycle
improvement qualifies for FTA funding
by defining a radius around a public
transportation stop or station within
which FTA will consider pedestrian and
bicycle improvements to have a de facto
functional relationship to public
transportation. For the reasons outlined
in this Policy Statement, and for
purposes of determining whether a
pedestrian or bicycle improvement has
a physical or functional relationship to
public transportation, all pedestrian
improvements located within one-half
mile and all bicycle improvements
located within three miles of a public
transportation stop or station shall have
a de facto physical and functional
relationship to public transportation.
Pedestrian and bicycle improvements
beyond these distances may be eligible
for FTA funding by demonstrating that
the improvement is within the distance
that people will travel by foot or by
bicycle to use a particular stop or
station.
II. Background
Walking, bicycling, and public
transportation are complementary
modes of transportation: many people
access public transportation by walking
a short distance; others arrive by
bicycle. The success of public
transportation can often be limited by
poor ‘‘first and last mile’’ access to the
system. Further, safe walking and
bicycling access can be important
inducements to using public
transportation. Thus, it is essential to
develop safe, secure, and appropriate
pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure if
the users of public transportation are to
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 161 (Friday, August 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52045-52046]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21235]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
[Dispute No. WTO/DS422]
WTO Dispute Settlement Proceeding Regarding United States--Anti-
Dumping Measures on Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From China
AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of the United States Trade Representative
(``USTR'') is providing notice that on July 22, 2011, the People's
Republic of China requested consultations with the United States under
the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization
(``WTO Agreement'') concerning anti-dumping measures regarding diamond
sawblades and parts thereof from China. That request may be found at
https://www.wto.org contained in a document designated as WT/DS422/1/
Add.1. USTR invites written comments from the public concerning the
issues raised in China's July 22, 2011 consultation request.
DATES: Although USTR will accept any comments received during the
course of the dispute settlement proceedings, comments should be
submitted on or before September 19, 2011, to be assured of timely
consideration by USTR.
ADDRESSES: Public comments should be submitted electronically to https://www.regulations.gov, docket number USTR-2011-0002. If you are unable
to provide submissions by https://www.regulations.gov, please contact
Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395-9483 to arrange for an alternative method of
transmission.
If (as explained below) the comment contains confidential
information, then the comment should be submitted by fax only to Sandy
McKinzy at (202) 395-3640.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jared Wessel, Assistant General
Counsel, Office of the United States Trade Representative, 600 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20508, (202) 395-3150.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: USTR is providing notice that consultations
have been requested pursuant to the WTO Understanding on Rules and
Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (``DSU''). If such
consultations should fail to resolve the matter and a dispute
settlement panel is established pursuant to the DSU, such panel, which
would hold its meetings in Geneva, Switzerland, would be expected to
issue a report on its findings and recommendations within nine months
after it is established.
Major Issues Raised by China
On July 22, 2011, China requested consultations regarding the
antidumping duty investigation conducted by the Department of Commerce
on diamond sawblades and parts thereof from China, referring in
particular to the use of what it calls ``zeroing'' in that proceeding.
Specifically, China requested consultations regarding the determination
by the Department of Commerce in (1) Final Determination of Sales at
Less than Fair Value and Final Partial Affirmative Determination of
Critical Circumstances: Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the
People's Republic of China, 71 FR 29303 (May 22, 2006) and the
accompanying May 15, 2006, Issues and Decision Memorandum, as well as
any amendments, replacements and/or implementing measures issued
pursuant thereto; and (2) Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the
People's Republic of China and Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty
Orders, 74 FR 57145 (November 4, 2009), as well as any amendments,
replacements and/or implementing measures issued pursuant thereto.
China asserts that the present request for consultations
constitutes an addendum to, and must be read together with, its
consultation request dated February 28, 2001 regarding anti-dumping
measures on certain frozen warmwater shrimp from China, WTO/DS422/1.
(See WTO Dispute Settlement Proceeding Regarding United States--Anti-
Dumping Measures on Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From China, 76 FR
17985 (March 31, 2011)).
China alleges that so-called zeroing is inconsistent with Articles
VI:1 and VI:2 of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 and
Articles 1, 2.1, 2.4, 2.4.2, 5.8, 9.2, 9.3, and 9.4 of the Agreement on
Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and
Trade 1994.
Public Comment: Requirements for Submissions
Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning the issues raised in this dispute. Persons may submit public
comments electronically to https://www.regulations.gov docket number
USTR-2011-0002. If you are unable to provide submissions by https://www.regulations.gov, please contact Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395-9483 to
[[Page 52046]]
arrange for an alternative method of transmission.
To submit comments via https://www.regulations.gov, enter docket
number USTR-2011-0002 on the home page and click ``search''. The site
will provide a search-results page listing all documents associated
with this docket. Find a reference to this notice by selecting
``Notice'' under ``Document Type'' on the left side of the search-
results page, and click on the link entitled ``Submit a Comment.'' (For
further information on using the https://www.regulations.gov Web site,
please consult the resources provided on the Web site by clicking on
``How to Use This Site'' on the left side of the home page.)
The https://www.regulations.gov site provides the option of
providing comments by filling in a ``Type Comment and Upload File''
field, or by attaching a document. It is expected that most comments
will be provided in an attached document. If a document is attached, it
is sufficient to type ``See attached'' in the ``Type Comment and Upload
File'' field.
A person requesting that information contained in a comment
submitted by that person be treated as confidential business
information must certify that such information is business confidential
and would not customarily be released to the public by the submitter.
Confidential business information must be clearly designated as such
and the submission must be marked ``BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL'' at the top
and bottom of the cover page and each succeeding page. Any comment
containing business confidential information must be submitted by fax
to Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395-3640. A non-confidential summary of the
confidential information must be submitted to https://www.regulations.gov. The non-confidential summary will be placed in the
docket and open to public inspection.
Information or advice contained in a comment submitted, other than
business confidential information, may be determined by USTR to be
confidential in accordance with section 135(g)(2) of the Trade Act of
1974 (19 U.S.C. 2155(g)(2)). If the submitter believes that information
or advice may qualify as such, the submitter--
(1) Must clearly so designate the information or advice;
(2) Must clearly mark the material as ``SUBMITTED IN CONFIDENCE''
at the top and bottom of the cover page and each succeeding page; and
(3) Must provide a non-confidential summary of the information or
advice.
Any comment containing confidential information must be submitted
by fax. A non-confidential summary of the confidential information must
be submitted to https://www.regulations.gov. The non-confidential
summary will be placed in the docket and open to public inspection.
Pursuant to section 127(e) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (19
U.S.C. 3537(e)), USTR will maintain a docket on this dispute settlement
proceeding accessible to the public at https://www.regulations.gov,
docket number USTR-2011-0002. The public file will include non-
confidential comments received by USTR from the public with respect to
the dispute. If a dispute settlement panel is convened or in the event
of an appeal from such a panel, the U.S. submissions, any non-
confidential submissions, or non-confidential summaries of submissions,
received from other participants in the dispute, will be made available
to the public on USTR's Web site at https://www.ustr.gov, and the report
of the panel, and, if applicable, the report of the Appellate Body,
will be available on the Web site of the World Trade Organization,
https://www.wto.org. Comments open to public inspection may be viewed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web site.
William Busis,
Deputy Assistant United States Trade Representative for Monitoring and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2011-21235 Filed 8-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-W1-P