Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Colorado; Revised Definitions; Construction Permit Program Fee Increases; Regulation 3, 51903-51905 [2011-21233]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 161 / Friday, August 19, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
stationary sources (i.e., emissions that
are not regulated by rule 3745–21–09,
3745–21–12, 3745–21–13, 3745–21–14,
3745–21–15, 3745–21–16, or 3745–21–
18 of the Administrative Code).’’ On
February 8, 2008, the previously
existing rule 3745–21–07 was rescinded
by Ohio EPA.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Ohio Administrative Code Rule
3745–21–07 ‘‘Control of emissions of
organic materials from stationary
sources (i.e., emissions that are not
regulated by rule 3745–21–09, 3745–21–
12, 3745–21–13, 3745–21–14, 3745–21–
15, 3745–21–16, or 3745–21–18 of the
Administrative Code),’’ effective
February 18, 2008.
(B) February 18, 2008, ‘‘Director’s
Final Findings and Orders’’, signed by
Chris Korleski, Director, Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency.
(ii) Additional material.
(A) An October 25, 2010, letter from
Robert F. Hodanbosi, Chief Division of
Air Pollution Control of the Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency to
Susan Hedman, Regional Administrator,
containing documentation of
noninterference, under section 110(l) of
the Clean Air Act, of the less stringent
applicability cutoff for sheet mold
compound machines.
[FR Doc. 2011–21225 Filed 8–18–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2011–0340; FRL–9454–3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Colorado; Revised Definitions;
Construction Permit Program Fee
Increases; Regulation 3
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving the two
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision packages submitted by the State
of Colorado on August 1, 2007. EPA is
approving the August 1, 2007 submittal
revisions to Regulation 3, Part A,
Section I where the State expanded on
the definition of nitrogen dioxide (NO2)
to include it as a precursor to ozone. An
increase in the amount of the fees
charged for pollutant emissions and
minor wording additions as specified in
Regulation 3, Part A, Section VI.D.1 is
approved. EPA is also approving one
grammatical change the State made to
Regulation 3 in the August 1, 2007
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:34 Aug 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
submittal. In addition, EPA is taking no
action on several revisions to Colorado’s
Regulation 3 regarding New Source
Review (NSR), that are contained in this
submittal, where previously proposed,
pending, or future actions by EPA have
addressed or will address these
revisions. EPA is also not acting on
three provisions in the submittals that
are not in Colorado’s SIP and revisions
to the State’s requirements to file Air
Pollution Emission Notices (APENs).
This action is being taken under section
110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: EFFECTIVE DATE: This final rule is
effective September 19, 2011.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R08–OAR–2011–0340. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Program, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the individual
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to view the hard copy
of the docket. You may view the hard
copy of the docket Monday through
Friday, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Komp, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 8, Mail Code 8P–AR, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129, telephone number (303)
312–6022, fax number (303) 312–6064,
komp.mark@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Definitions
For the purpose of this document, we
are giving meaning to certain words or
initials as follows:
(i) The words or initials Act or CAA
mean or refer to the Clean Air Act,
unless the context indicates otherwise.
(ii) The words EPA, we, us or our
mean or refer to the United States
Environmental Protection Agency.
(iii) The initials SIP mean or refer to
State Implementation Plan.
(iv) The words State or Colorado
mean the State of Colorado, unless the
context indicates otherwise.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51903
(v) The initials APEN mean or refer to
Air Pollutant Emission Notice.
(vi) The initials NSR mean or refer to
New Source Review, the initials PSD
mean or refer to Prevention of
Significant Deterioration and the initials
NAAQS mean or refer to National
Ambient Air Quality Standards.
(vii) The initials NO2 mean Nitrogen
Dioxide.
Table of Contents
I. Background Information
II. Response to Comments
III. Section 110(l) of the CAA
IV. Final Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background Information
The State’s August 1, 2007 submittal
consisted of two packages of revisions to
the State’s Regulation 3. The first
package of revisions was adopted by the
State on August 17, 2006 and corrected
minor issues EPA had identified
regarding Colorado’s NSR program. The
State adopted the revisions in order to
ensure that the State would continue to
have Federal approval of its NSR
program. In the definitions section of
Regulation 3, Part A, Section I.B.16,
Colorado adopted language to treat NO2
as an ozone precursor. The State added
in Part A, Section II.C.2.b(ii) under its
APEN requirements that an increase of
one ton per year or greater of nitrogen
oxides emissions from a source with
annual actual emissions less than one
hundred tons and located in an ozone
nonattainment area constituted a
significant change. A significant change
meant that a new APEN must be
submitted to the State.
In the same revision, Methyl Ethyl
Ketone was removed as a reportable
compound from Appendix B of
Regulation 3. The State added T-Butyl
Acetate as a non-criteria reportable
pollutant in Regulation 3, Appendix B.
The second package of revisions
adopted on December 14, 2006
contained annual emission fee increases
in Part A, Section VI.D.1 of Regulation
3. The increase in fees is used to pay for
the State’s increased workload from the
processing of APENs and permits.
One grammatical change was made by
the State in Part A, Section I.B.9.d. in
their Regulation 3. The grammatical
change is listed as follows:
• Section I.B.9.d. Applicable
Requirement.
The right double parenthesis around
the wording ‘‘Regulation No. 8’’ was
removed and replaced with a single
right parenthesis.
E:\FR\FM\19AUR1.SGM
19AUR1
51904
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 161 / Friday, August 19, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
II. Response to Comments
EPA did not receive comments
regarding our proposed rule for
Colorado’s Regulation 3 revisions.
III. Section 110(l) of the CAA
Section 110(l) of the CAA states that
a SIP revision cannot be approved if the
revision would interfere with any
applicable requirement concerning
attainment and reasonable further
progress toward attainment of the
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) or any other applicable
requirement of the Act. The Colorado
SIP revisions being approved that are
the subject of this action do not interfere
with attainment of the NAAQS or any
other applicable requirement of the Act.
In regard to the August 1, 2007
submittals, EPA is approving several
revisions to the State’s Regulation
Number 3. These portions do not relax
the stringency of the Colorado SIP since
they are housekeeping in nature.
Therefore, the portions of the revisions
proposed for approval satisfy section
110(l) requirements because they do not
relax existing SIP requirements.
IV. Final Action
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
What EPA Is Approving
On May 27, 2011 (76 FR 30894), we
proposed approval of the revisions to
the State’s Regulation Number 3 as
identified above. In this action we are
approving the State’s adding of the
definition within Part A, Section I.B.16.
as it pertains to NO2 as a precursor to
ozone. We are also approving the
increase in the amount of the fees
charged for pollutant emissions and
minor wording additions as specified in
Regulation 3, Part A, Section VI.D.1.
One minor grammatical revision made
to Section I.B.9.d., as identified above,
is also being approved.
Where EPA Is Taking No Action
The August 1, 2007 submittal
included three revisions that are not
approved as part of the SIP. First,
changes to Appendix B of Regulation 3
where the State removed Methyl Ethyl
Ketone as a reportable compound.
Second, the State added T-Butyl Acetate
as a non-criteria reportable pollutant in
Regulation 3, Appendix B. Third,
changes made to Part C, Concerning
Operating Permits (Part C. X.A.5). These
revisions are not part of the EPAapproved SIP and these Appendices are
not incorporated by reference into 40
CFR 52.320.
The State corrected minor issues EPA
had identified regarding Colorado’s NSR
program. The State adopted the
revisions in order to ensure that the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:34 Aug 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
State would continue to have Federal
approval of its NSR program. EPA has
proposed to approve Colorado’s NSR
program in a separate action on
December 7, 2005 (70 FR 72744).
Therefore, we are not taking action on
Colorado’s NSR program within the
context of today’s action rather we will
act on these revisions in a future action.
The State’s submittal also contains
minor corrections to its APEN
requirements that we have proposed to
approve in a separate action on January
25, 2011 (76 FR 4271); therefore, we are
not acting on those here.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
Tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt
Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by October 18, 2011.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: July 14, 2011.
Stephen S. Tuber,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
E:\FR\FM\19AUR1.SGM
19AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 161 / Friday, August 19, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart G—Colorado
2. Add paragraph (d) to § 52.329 as
follows:
■
§ 52.329
Rules and regulations.
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(d) On August 7, 2007, the Colorado
submitted two packages with revisions
to Colorado’s Regulation 3 Regulation, 5
CCR 1001–5, Part A. One change adopts
language to treat nitrogen dioxide as an
ozone precursor. The State also adopted
an increase in fees used to pay for the
State’s increased workload from the
processing of Air Pollutant Emission
Notices (APENs) and permits. Annual
and permit processing fees shall be
$16.54 for regulated pollutants and
$114.96 for Hazardous Air Pollutants.
One grammatical change was made to
the text of Part A, Section 1.B.9.d:
(1) Regulation 3, 5 CCR 1001–5, Air
Contaminant Emissions Notices, Part A,
Concerning General Provisions
Applicable to Reporting and Permitting,
Section I, Applicability, Section I.B.9.d,
Applicable Requirement, effective
October 2006: Any standard or other
requirement under section 112 of the
Federal Act (hazardous air pollutants,
including any requirement concerning
accident prevention under section
112(r)(7) of the Federal Act) (Regulation
No. 8) but not including the contents of
any risk management plan required
under section 112(r) of the Federal Act.
(2) Regulation 3, 5 CCR 1001–5, Air
Contaminant Emissions Notices, Part A,
Concerning General Provisions
Applicable to Reporting and Permitting,
Section I, Applicability, Section I.B.16,
Criteria Pollutants, effective October
2006:
(i) Those pollutants for which the U.S.
EPA has established national ambient
air quality standards, including: carbon
monoxide, nitrogen dioxide (direct
emissions and as a precursor to ozone),
sulfur dioxide, PM10, total suspended
particulate matter, ozone, volatile
organic compounds (as a precursor to
ozone), and lead.
(ii) For the purpose of Air Pollutant
Emission Notice reporting, criteria
pollutants shall also include nitrogen
oxides, fluorides, sulfuric acid mist,
hydrogen sulfide, total reduced sulfur,
reduced sulfur compounds, municipal
waste combustor organics, municipal
waste combustor metals, and municipal
waste combustor acid gases.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:34 Aug 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
(3) Regulation 3, 5 CCR 1001–5, Air
Contaminant Emissions Notices, Part A,
Concerning General Provisions
Applicable to Reporting and Permitting,
Section VI Fees; Section VI.D.1, Fee
Schedule, effective February 2007:
Annual and permit processing fees shall
be charged in accordance with and in
the amounts specified in the provisions
of Colorado Revised Statues section 25–
7–114.7. Annual fees for regulated
pollutants shall be $16.54. Annual fees
for hazardous air pollutants shall be
$114.96.
[FR Doc. 2011–21233 Filed 8–18–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 040205043–4043–01]
RIN 0648–XA592
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Gulf of
Mexico Reef Fish Fishery; 2011
Commercial Quota and 2011
Commercial Fishing Season for
Greater Amberjack
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; reopening.
AGENCY:
NMFS implements this
temporary final rule to increase the
commercial quota for greater amberjack
in the Gulf of Mexico (Gulf) for the 2011
fishing year and reopen the 2011
commercial fishing season for greater
amberjack for a limited time period.
These actions are necessary to achieve
the optimum yield for the fishery, thus
enhancing social and economic benefits
to the fishery.
DATES: This rule is effective August 19,
2011 through December 31, 2011, except
for the reopening of the commercial
sector for Gulf greater amberjack. The
commercial sector for Gulf greater
amberjack will reopen at 12:01 a.m.,
local time, September 1, 2011, and close
at 12:01 a.m., local time, October 31,
2011.
SUMMARY:
Electronic copies of the
final rule for Amendment 30A, the Final
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement (FSEIS) for Amendment 30A,
and other supporting documentation
may be obtained from Rich Malinowski,
NMFS, Southeast Regional Office, 263
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51905
13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL
33701; telephone: 727–824–5305.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rich
Malinowski, telephone: 727–824–5305,
e-mail Rich.Malinowski@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The reef
fish fishery of the Gulf is managed
under the Fishery Management Plan for
Reef Fish Resources of the Gulf of
Mexico (FMP). The FMP was prepared
by the Gulf of Mexico Fishery
Management Council (Council) and is
implemented under the authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) by regulations
at 50 CFR part 622.
Background
The 2006 reauthorization of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act implemented
new requirements that annual catch
limits (ACLs) and accountability
measures (AMs) be established to end
overfishing and prevent overfishing
from occurring. AMs are management
controls to prevent ACLs from being
exceeded, and correct or mitigate
overages of the ACL if they occur.
Section 303(a)(15) of the MagnusonStevens Act mandates the establishment
of ACLs at a level such that overfishing
does not occur in the fishery, including
measures to ensure accountability.
On July 3, 2008, NMFS issued a final
rule (73 FR 38139) to implement
Amendment 30A to the FMP
(Amendment 30A). Amendment 30A
established a commercial quota for Gulf
greater amberjack of 503,000 lb (228,157
kg) and an AM that would go into effect
if the commercial quota for greater
amberjack is exceeded. In accordance
with regulations at 50 CFR
622.49(a)(1)(i), when the applicable
commercial quota is reached, or
projected to be reached, the Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA,
(AA), will file a notification with the
Office of the Federal Register to close
the commercial sector for the remainder
of the fishing year. If despite such
closure, commercial landings exceed the
quota, the AA will reduce the quota the
year following an overage by the amount
of the overage of the prior fishing year.
Landings data for 2010, provided by
the Southeast Fisheries Science Center
(SEFSC) in April, 2011, indicated
562,172 lb (254,997 kg) were landed by
the commercial sector, for an overage of
189,100 lb (85,774 kg). Therefore, for
2011, NMFS published a rule in the
Federal Register (76 FR 23909, April 29,
2011) announcing the 503,000-lb
commercial quota would be adjusted to
313,900 lb (142,383 kg) to account for
the overage. However, recently updated
E:\FR\FM\19AUR1.SGM
19AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 161 (Friday, August 19, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51903-51905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21233]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R08-OAR-2011-0340; FRL-9454-3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Colorado; Revised Definitions; Construction Permit Program Fee
Increases; Regulation 3
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving the two State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision packages submitted by the State of Colorado on August 1, 2007.
EPA is approving the August 1, 2007 submittal revisions to Regulation
3, Part A, Section I where the State expanded on the definition of
nitrogen dioxide (NO2) to include it as a precursor to
ozone. An increase in the amount of the fees charged for pollutant
emissions and minor wording additions as specified in Regulation 3,
Part A, Section VI.D.1 is approved. EPA is also approving one
grammatical change the State made to Regulation 3 in the August 1, 2007
submittal. In addition, EPA is taking no action on several revisions to
Colorado's Regulation 3 regarding New Source Review (NSR), that are
contained in this submittal, where previously proposed, pending, or
future actions by EPA have addressed or will address these revisions.
EPA is also not acting on three provisions in the submittals that are
not in Colorado's SIP and revisions to the State's requirements to file
Air Pollution Emission Notices (APENs). This action is being taken
under section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective September 19, 2011.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R08-OAR-2011-0340. All documents in the docket are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only
in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air
Program, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop
Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to view the hard copy of the docket. You
may view the hard copy of the docket Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4
p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Komp, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, Mail Code 8P-AR, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129, telephone number (303)
312-6022, fax number (303) 312-6064, komp.mark@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Definitions
For the purpose of this document, we are giving meaning to certain
words or initials as follows:
(i) The words or initials Act or CAA mean or refer to the Clean Air
Act, unless the context indicates otherwise.
(ii) The words EPA, we, us or our mean or refer to the United
States Environmental Protection Agency.
(iii) The initials SIP mean or refer to State Implementation Plan.
(iv) The words State or Colorado mean the State of Colorado, unless
the context indicates otherwise.
(v) The initials APEN mean or refer to Air Pollutant Emission
Notice.
(vi) The initials NSR mean or refer to New Source Review, the
initials PSD mean or refer to Prevention of Significant Deterioration
and the initials NAAQS mean or refer to National Ambient Air Quality
Standards.
(vii) The initials NO2 mean Nitrogen Dioxide.
Table of Contents
I. Background Information
II. Response to Comments
III. Section 110(l) of the CAA
IV. Final Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background Information
The State's August 1, 2007 submittal consisted of two packages of
revisions to the State's Regulation 3. The first package of revisions
was adopted by the State on August 17, 2006 and corrected minor issues
EPA had identified regarding Colorado's NSR program. The State adopted
the revisions in order to ensure that the State would continue to have
Federal approval of its NSR program. In the definitions section of
Regulation 3, Part A, Section I.B.16, Colorado adopted language to
treat NO2 as an ozone precursor. The State added in Part A,
Section II.C.2.b(ii) under its APEN requirements that an increase of
one ton per year or greater of nitrogen oxides emissions from a source
with annual actual emissions less than one hundred tons and located in
an ozone nonattainment area constituted a significant change. A
significant change meant that a new APEN must be submitted to the
State.
In the same revision, Methyl Ethyl Ketone was removed as a
reportable compound from Appendix B of Regulation 3. The State added T-
Butyl Acetate as a non-criteria reportable pollutant in Regulation 3,
Appendix B.
The second package of revisions adopted on December 14, 2006
contained annual emission fee increases in Part A, Section VI.D.1 of
Regulation 3. The increase in fees is used to pay for the State's
increased workload from the processing of APENs and permits.
One grammatical change was made by the State in Part A, Section
I.B.9.d. in their Regulation 3. The grammatical change is listed as
follows:
Section I.B.9.d. Applicable Requirement.
The right double parenthesis around the wording ``Regulation No.
8'' was removed and replaced with a single right parenthesis.
[[Page 51904]]
II. Response to Comments
EPA did not receive comments regarding our proposed rule for
Colorado's Regulation 3 revisions.
III. Section 110(l) of the CAA
Section 110(l) of the CAA states that a SIP revision cannot be
approved if the revision would interfere with any applicable
requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress
toward attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
or any other applicable requirement of the Act. The Colorado SIP
revisions being approved that are the subject of this action do not
interfere with attainment of the NAAQS or any other applicable
requirement of the Act. In regard to the August 1, 2007 submittals, EPA
is approving several revisions to the State's Regulation Number 3.
These portions do not relax the stringency of the Colorado SIP since
they are housekeeping in nature. Therefore, the portions of the
revisions proposed for approval satisfy section 110(l) requirements
because they do not relax existing SIP requirements.
IV. Final Action
What EPA Is Approving
On May 27, 2011 (76 FR 30894), we proposed approval of the
revisions to the State's Regulation Number 3 as identified above. In
this action we are approving the State's adding of the definition
within Part A, Section I.B.16. as it pertains to NO2 as a
precursor to ozone. We are also approving the increase in the amount of
the fees charged for pollutant emissions and minor wording additions as
specified in Regulation 3, Part A, Section VI.D.1.
One minor grammatical revision made to Section I.B.9.d., as
identified above, is also being approved.
Where EPA Is Taking No Action
The August 1, 2007 submittal included three revisions that are not
approved as part of the SIP. First, changes to Appendix B of Regulation
3 where the State removed Methyl Ethyl Ketone as a reportable compound.
Second, the State added T-Butyl Acetate as a non-criteria reportable
pollutant in Regulation 3, Appendix B. Third, changes made to Part C,
Concerning Operating Permits (Part C. X.A.5). These revisions are not
part of the EPA-approved SIP and these Appendices are not incorporated
by reference into 40 CFR 52.320.
The State corrected minor issues EPA had identified regarding
Colorado's NSR program. The State adopted the revisions in order to
ensure that the State would continue to have Federal approval of its
NSR program. EPA has proposed to approve Colorado's NSR program in a
separate action on December 7, 2005 (70 FR 72744). Therefore, we are
not taking action on Colorado's NSR program within the context of
today's action rather we will act on these revisions in a future
action.
The State's submittal also contains minor corrections to its APEN
requirements that we have proposed to approve in a separate action on
January 25, 2011 (76 FR 4271); therefore, we are not acting on those
here.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 18, 2011. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: July 14, 2011.
Stephen S. Tuber,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
[[Page 51905]]
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart G--Colorado
0
2. Add paragraph (d) to Sec. 52.329 as follows:
Sec. 52.329 Rules and regulations.
* * * * *
(d) On August 7, 2007, the Colorado submitted two packages with
revisions to Colorado's Regulation 3 Regulation, 5 CCR 1001-5, Part A.
One change adopts language to treat nitrogen dioxide as an ozone
precursor. The State also adopted an increase in fees used to pay for
the State's increased workload from the processing of Air Pollutant
Emission Notices (APENs) and permits. Annual and permit processing fees
shall be $16.54 for regulated pollutants and $114.96 for Hazardous Air
Pollutants. One grammatical change was made to the text of Part A,
Section 1.B.9.d:
(1) Regulation 3, 5 CCR 1001-5, Air Contaminant Emissions Notices,
Part A, Concerning General Provisions Applicable to Reporting and
Permitting, Section I, Applicability, Section I.B.9.d, Applicable
Requirement, effective October 2006: Any standard or other requirement
under section 112 of the Federal Act (hazardous air pollutants,
including any requirement concerning accident prevention under section
112(r)(7) of the Federal Act) (Regulation No. 8) but not including the
contents of any risk management plan required under section 112(r) of
the Federal Act.
(2) Regulation 3, 5 CCR 1001-5, Air Contaminant Emissions Notices,
Part A, Concerning General Provisions Applicable to Reporting and
Permitting, Section I, Applicability, Section I.B.16, Criteria
Pollutants, effective October 2006:
(i) Those pollutants for which the U.S. EPA has established
national ambient air quality standards, including: carbon monoxide,
nitrogen dioxide (direct emissions and as a precursor to ozone), sulfur
dioxide, PM10, total suspended particulate matter, ozone, volatile
organic compounds (as a precursor to ozone), and lead.
(ii) For the purpose of Air Pollutant Emission Notice reporting,
criteria pollutants shall also include nitrogen oxides, fluorides,
sulfuric acid mist, hydrogen sulfide, total reduced sulfur, reduced
sulfur compounds, municipal waste combustor organics, municipal waste
combustor metals, and municipal waste combustor acid gases.
(3) Regulation 3, 5 CCR 1001-5, Air Contaminant Emissions Notices,
Part A, Concerning General Provisions Applicable to Reporting and
Permitting, Section VI Fees; Section VI.D.1, Fee Schedule, effective
February 2007: Annual and permit processing fees shall be charged in
accordance with and in the amounts specified in the provisions of
Colorado Revised Statues section 25-7-114.7. Annual fees for regulated
pollutants shall be $16.54. Annual fees for hazardous air pollutants
shall be $114.96.
[FR Doc. 2011-21233 Filed 8-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P