Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Identification of Critical Safety Items (DFARS Case 2010-D022), 52138-52139 [2011-20529]
Download as PDF
52138
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 161 / Friday, August 19, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
7. Revise section 252.244–7000 to
read as follows:
■
252.244–7000 Subcontracts for
Commercial Items and Commercial
Components (DoD Contracts).
As prescribed in 244.403, use the
following clause:
SUBCONTRACTS FOR COMMERCIAL
ITEMS AND COMMERCIAL COMPONENTS
(DOD CONTRACTS) (AUG 2011)
In addition to the clauses listed in
paragraph (c) of the Subcontracts for
Commercial Items clause of this contract
(Federal Acquisition Regulation 52.244–6),
the Contractor shall include the terms of the
following clauses, if applicable, in
subcontracts for commercial items or
commercial components, awarded at any tier
under this contract:
(a) 252.225–7009 Restriction on
Acquisition of Certain Articles Containing
Specialty Metals (JAN 2011) (10 U.S.C.
2533b).
(b) 252.225–7039, Contractors Performing
Private Security Functions (AUG 2011)
(Section 862 of Pub. L. 110–181, as amended
by section 853 of Pub. L. 110–417 and
sections 831 and 832 of Pub. L. 111–383).
(c) 252.236–7013 Requirement for
Competition Opportunity for American Steel
Producers, Fabricators, and Manufacturers
(JAN 2009) (Pub. L. 110–329, Division E,
Section 108).
(d) 252.237–7010 Prohibition on
Interrogation of Detainees by Contractor
Personnel (NOV 2010) (Section 1038 of Pub.
L. 111–84).
(e) 252.237–7019 Training for Contractor
Personnel Interacting with Detainees (SEP
2006) (Section 1092 of Pub. L. 108–375).
(f) 252.246–7003 Notification of Potential
Safety Issues (JAN 2007).
(g) 252.247–7023 Transportation of
Supplies by Sea (MAY 2002) (10 U.S.C.
2631).
(h) 252.247–7024 Notification of
Transportation of Supplies by Sea (MAR
2000) (10 U.S.C. 2631).
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 2011–20528 Filed 8–18–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Parts 209 and 252
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES2
RIN 0750–AG92
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; Identification
of Critical Safety Items (DFARS Case
2010–D022)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:30 Aug 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
DoD is issuing a final rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to add a contract clause that
clearly identifies any items being
purchased that are critical safety items
so that the proper risk-based
surveillance can be performed.
DATES: Effective Date: August 19, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Meredith Murphy, 703–602–1302.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
DoD published a proposed rule at 76
FR 14641 on March 17, 2011, to add a
contract clause that clearly identifies
any items being purchased that are
critical safety items so that the proper
risk-based surveillance can be
performed. One public comment was
received in response to the proposed
rule.
II. Discussion and Analysis of the
Public Comment
Comment: The respondent noted that
the DFARS case specifically addresses
aviation and ship critical safety items,
but states that protective personal
equipment, such as body armor and
helmets, can also have catastrophic
results if they fail. The respondent
asked how DoD ensures that contract
administration activities apply
increased surveillance procedures in
these types of contracts.
Response: The additional risk-based
surveillance required for aviation and
ship critical safety items is mandated by
law (section 802 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004
and section 130 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007).
There is no equivalent statutory
requirement for protective personal
equipment, and instituting such a
requirement is outside the scope of this
case. However, the respondent’s
comment has been forwarded to the
Defense Contract Management Agency
for future consideration.
The respondent also asked about the
process that ensures that contract
administration activities apply
increased surveillance procedures when
aviation and ship critical safety items
have been identified. The process was
summarized in the preamble to the
proposed rule published at 76 FR 14642
on March 17, 2011. Briefly, the
combination of the actions of the design
control activities, joint agency
instructions (e.g., Management of
Aviation Critical Safety Items),
limitations on contracting with sources
that have not been approved by the
design control activity, and focus on
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
contract administration will ensure the
proper surveillance for these critical
items.
The respondent did not recommend
changes to the DFARS text or clause,
and the final rule does not revise the
DFARS text or clause from that
published in the proposed rule.
II. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of Defense certifies
that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. Its
purpose is internal to the Government
only by alerting Government qualityassurance activities to existing
heightened surveillance requirements
that are imposed by DoD requiring
activities. The process for identifying an
item as a critical safety item occurs
entirely outside the acquisition process,
as does the process of approving a
source for production of a critical safety
item. No comments from small entities
were received in response to publication
of the proposed rule.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 209 and
252
Government procurement.
Ynette R. Shelkin,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 209 and 252
are amended as follows:
E:\FR\FM\19AUR2.SGM
19AUR2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 161 / Friday, August 19, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 209 and 252 continues to read as
follows:
■
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
PART 209—CONTRACTOR
QUALIFICATIONS
2. Add section 209.270–5 to read as
follows:
■
209.270–5
Contract clause.
The contracting officer shall insert the
clause at 252.209–7010, Critical Safety
Items, in solicitations and contracts
when the acquisition includes one or
more items designated by the design
control activity as critical safety items.
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
critical safety item. The following items have
been designated aviation critical safety items
or ship critical safety items by the designated
design control activity:
lllllllllllllllllllll
lllllllllllllllllllll
lllllllllllllllllllll
lllllllllllllllllllll
(Insert additional lines as necessary)
(c) Heightened quality assurance
surveillance. Items designated in paragraph
(b) of this clause are subject to heightened,
risk-based surveillance by the designated
quality assurance representative.
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 2011–20529 Filed 8–18–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
3. Add section 252.209–7010 to read
as follows:
48 CFR Parts 201, 245, and 252
252.209–7010
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; Government;
Property (DFARS Case 2009–D008)
■
RIN Number 0750–AG38
Critical Safety Items.
wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES2
As prescribed in 209.270–5, use the
following clause:
CRITICAL SAFETY ITEMS (AUG 2011)
(a) Definitions.
Aviation critical safety item means a part,
an assembly, installation equipment, launch
equipment, recovery equipment, or support
equipment for an aircraft or aviation weapon
system if the part, assembly, or equipment
contains a characteristic any failure,
malfunction, or absence of which could
cause—
(i) A catastrophic or critical failure
resulting in the loss of, or serious damage to,
the aircraft or weapon system;
(ii) An unacceptable risk of personal injury
or loss of life; or
(iii) An uncommanded engine shutdown
that jeopardizes safety.
Design control activity. (i) With respect to
an aviation critical safety item, means the
systems command of a military department
that is specifically responsible for ensuring
the airworthiness of an aviation system or
equipment, in which an aviation critical
safety item is to be used; and
(ii) With respect to a ship critical safety
item, means the systems command of a
military department that is specifically
responsible for ensuring the seaworthiness of
a ship or ship equipment, in which a ship
critical safety item is to be used.
Ship critical safety item means any ship
part, assembly, or support equipment
containing a characteristic, the failure,
malfunction, or absence of which could
cause—
(i) A catastrophic or critical failure
resulting in loss of, or serious damage to, the
ship; or
(ii) An unacceptable risk of personal injury
or loss of life.
(b) Identification of critical safety items.
One or more of the items being procured
under this contract is an aviation or ship
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:30 Aug 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is issuing a final rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) regarding Government
Property, to reflect the recent revisions
to Government Property elsewhere in
the Code of Federal Regulations.
DATES: Effective Date: August 19, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Meredith Murphy, 703–602–1302.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
DoD is revising subparts 245.6 and
245.7 to be consistent with the changes
to FAR subparts 45.6 and 45.7,
published in the Federal Register at 72
FR 27364 on May 15, 2007. A proposed
DFARS rule was published in the
Federal Register at 75 FR 75444 on
December 3, 2010. The public comment
period for the proposed rule closed
February 1, 2011. Comments were
received from three respondents. A
discussion and analysis of the
comments is provided in section II of
this notice. Any revisions to the final
rule based on public comments are
addressed in the DoD responses to the
comments received.
II. Discussion and Analysis
Comments received in response to the
proposed rule are organized into six
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
52139
categories and are discussed in the
paragraphs that follow.
A. Clarifying Responsibilities
Comment: A respondent
recommended that ‘‘* * * or the head
of the contract administration office’’ be
added to DFARS 201.670(a).
DoD response: DFARS 201.670(a) has
been revised to specify that the
appropriate agency authority may
delegate contract administration
functions to the cognizant contract
administration office, in which case the
contract administration office appoints
the property administrators and plant
clearance officers in writing. This
language was formerly found at DFARS
245.70.
Comment: A respondent
recommended that DFARS 252.245–
70XX(i) be revised to make the
contractor’s responsibility for
compliance with export control law and
regulations a ‘‘due diligence
responsibility.’’
DoD Response: In the context of
surplus sales, it is the buyer’s
responsibility to adhere to export
control laws and regulations. Therefore,
the referenced paragraph has been
deleted and a new paragraph (g) has
been inserted to specify that disposition
shall be in accordance with foreign and
U.S. laws and regulations, including
regulations involving export controls,
host nation requirements, Final
Governing Standards, and Governmentto-Government agreements, and that the
contractor’s responsibility to comply
with all applicable laws and regulations
regarding export-controlled items exists
independent of the information
provided by the clause. The new
language is consistent with the
respondent’s recommendation and
current DFARS language at 252.204–
7008.
B. Inventory Schedules
Comment: A respondent stated that
the requirement at DFARS 245.602–1 for
‘‘obtaining bills of material and
reviewing recent purchases, and stock
record entries’’ is not a part of the
disposal process. The respondent
commented that these duties require the
plant clearance officer to have a working
knowledge of every contract and that
the process will drive up costs.
DoD Response: The proposed
language at 245.602–1 exists today in
the current DFARS at 245.7201. The
proposed rule moved 245.7201 to
subpart 245.6, and renamed the subpart
Reporting, Reutilization, and Disposal,
to conform with the FAR; however, the
language at DFARS 245.602–1 has been
E:\FR\FM\19AUR2.SGM
19AUR2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 161 (Friday, August 19, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52138-52139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20529]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Parts 209 and 252
RIN 0750-AG92
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Identification
of Critical Safety Items (DFARS Case 2010-D022)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is issuing a final rule amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to add a contract clause that
clearly identifies any items being purchased that are critical safety
items so that the proper risk-based surveillance can be performed.
DATES: Effective Date: August 19, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Meredith Murphy, 703-602-1302.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD published a proposed rule at 76 FR 14641 on March 17, 2011, to
add a contract clause that clearly identifies any items being purchased
that are critical safety items so that the proper risk-based
surveillance can be performed. One public comment was received in
response to the proposed rule.
II. Discussion and Analysis of the Public Comment
Comment: The respondent noted that the DFARS case specifically
addresses aviation and ship critical safety items, but states that
protective personal equipment, such as body armor and helmets, can also
have catastrophic results if they fail. The respondent asked how DoD
ensures that contract administration activities apply increased
surveillance procedures in these types of contracts.
Response: The additional risk-based surveillance required for
aviation and ship critical safety items is mandated by law (section 802
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 and
section 130 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2007). There is no equivalent statutory requirement for protective
personal equipment, and instituting such a requirement is outside the
scope of this case. However, the respondent's comment has been
forwarded to the Defense Contract Management Agency for future
consideration.
The respondent also asked about the process that ensures that
contract administration activities apply increased surveillance
procedures when aviation and ship critical safety items have been
identified. The process was summarized in the preamble to the proposed
rule published at 76 FR 14642 on March 17, 2011. Briefly, the
combination of the actions of the design control activities, joint
agency instructions (e.g., Management of Aviation Critical Safety
Items), limitations on contracting with sources that have not been
approved by the design control activity, and focus on contract
administration will ensure the proper surveillance for these critical
items.
The respondent did not recommend changes to the DFARS text or
clause, and the final rule does not revise the DFARS text or clause
from that published in the proposed rule.
II. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was subject to
review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of Defense certifies that this final rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
601, et seq. Its purpose is internal to the Government only by alerting
Government quality-assurance activities to existing heightened
surveillance requirements that are imposed by DoD requiring activities.
The process for identifying an item as a critical safety item occurs
entirely outside the acquisition process, as does the process of
approving a source for production of a critical safety item. No
comments from small entities were received in response to publication
of the proposed rule.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 209 and 252
Government procurement.
Ynette R. Shelkin,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 209 and 252 are amended as follows:
[[Page 52139]]
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 209 and 252 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
PART 209--CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS
0
2. Add section 209.270-5 to read as follows:
209.270-5 Contract clause.
The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 252.209-7010,
Critical Safety Items, in solicitations and contracts when the
acquisition includes one or more items designated by the design control
activity as critical safety items.
PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
3. Add section 252.209-7010 to read as follows:
252.209-7010 Critical Safety Items.
As prescribed in 209.270-5, use the following clause:
CRITICAL SAFETY ITEMS (AUG 2011)
(a) Definitions.
Aviation critical safety item means a part, an assembly,
installation equipment, launch equipment, recovery equipment, or
support equipment for an aircraft or aviation weapon system if the
part, assembly, or equipment contains a characteristic any failure,
malfunction, or absence of which could cause--
(i) A catastrophic or critical failure resulting in the loss of,
or serious damage to, the aircraft or weapon system;
(ii) An unacceptable risk of personal injury or loss of life; or
(iii) An uncommanded engine shutdown that jeopardizes safety.
Design control activity. (i) With respect to an aviation
critical safety item, means the systems command of a military
department that is specifically responsible for ensuring the
airworthiness of an aviation system or equipment, in which an
aviation critical safety item is to be used; and
(ii) With respect to a ship critical safety item, means the
systems command of a military department that is specifically
responsible for ensuring the seaworthiness of a ship or ship
equipment, in which a ship critical safety item is to be used.
Ship critical safety item means any ship part, assembly, or
support equipment containing a characteristic, the failure,
malfunction, or absence of which could cause--
(i) A catastrophic or critical failure resulting in loss of, or
serious damage to, the ship; or
(ii) An unacceptable risk of personal injury or loss of life.
(b) Identification of critical safety items. One or more of the
items being procured under this contract is an aviation or ship
critical safety item. The following items have been designated
aviation critical safety items or ship critical safety items by the
designated design control activity:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Insert additional lines as necessary)
(c) Heightened quality assurance surveillance. Items designated
in paragraph (b) of this clause are subject to heightened, risk-
based surveillance by the designated quality assurance
representative.
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 2011-20529 Filed 8-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-P