Guidance for Industry on Residual Drug in Transdermal and Related Drug Delivery Systems; Availability, 51038-51039 [2011-20852]
Download as PDF
51038
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2011 / Notices
reports of possible postmarketing
adverse events. FDA has determined,
under § 314.161, that Halflytely and
Bisacodyl Tablets Bowel Prep Kit (10mg bisacodyl) was withdrawn from sale
for reasons of safety or effectiveness.
Braintree discontinued this product
containing a total dose of 10 milligrams
of bisacodyl from sale after receiving
approval from FDA on July 16, 2010, for
NDA 21–551/S–013, Halflytely and
Bisacodyl Tablets Bowel Prep Kit (PEG–
3350, sodium chloride, sodium
bicarbonate, and potassium chloride for
oral solution and one bisacodyl delayed
release tablet, 5 mg (5-mg bisacodyl)).
The data available from a clinical study
comparing the 10-mg version of
Halflytely and Bisacodyl Tablets Bowel
Prep Kit to a 5-mg version of the drug
product showed that the Halflytley and
Bisacodyl Tablets Bowl Prep Kit (5-mg
bisacodyl) has comparable effectiveness
to the 10-mg product and has a safety
advantage over the 10-mg product
because there is less abdominal fullness
and cramping in the patients treated
with the 5-mg product. Furthermore, the
10-mg product may be associated with
ischemic colitis.
FDA has also reviewed the latest
approved labeling for the 10-mg product
and has determined that it would need
to be updated with additional safety
information if Braintree were to
reintroduce the 10-mg product to the
market. FDA has determined that
additional clinical studies of safety and
efficacy would be necessary before
Halflytely and Bisacodyl Tablets Bowel
Prep Kit (10-mg bisacodyl) could be
considered for reintroduction to the
market. Accordingly, the Agency will
remove Halflytely and Bisacodyl Tablets
Bowel Prep Kit (PEG–3350, sodium
chloride, sodium bicarbonate, and
potassium chloride for oral solution and
two bisacodyl delayed release tablets, 5
mg) from the list of drug products
published in the Orange Book. FDA will
not accept or approve ANDAs that refer
to this drug product.
Dated: August 10, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 2011–20853 Filed 8–16–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2010–D–0246]
[Docket No. FDA–2007–D–0068; formerly
Docket No. 2007D–0290]
Draft Guidance for Industry: Cell
Selection Devices for Point of Care
Production of Minimally Manipulated
Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem
Cells; Withdrawal of Draft Guidance
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice; withdrawal.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
withdrawal of a draft guidance entitled
‘‘Draft Guidance for Industry: Cell
Selection Devices for Point of Care
Production of Minimally Manipulated
Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cells
(PBSCs)’’ dated July 2007.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
August 17, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tami Belouin, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration (HFM–17), 1401
Rockville Pike, suite 200N, Rockville,
MD 20852–1448, 301–827–6210.
In a notice
published in the Federal Register of
July 26, 2007 (72 FR 41080), FDA
announced the availability of a draft
guidance entitled ‘‘Draft Guidance for
Industry: Cell Selection Devices for
Point of Care Production of Minimally
Manipulated Autologous Peripheral
Blood Stem Cells (PBSCs).’’
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FDA has carefully considered the
comments received on the draft
guidance and, since that document
issued in 2007, has gained additional
experience with point of care devices
and the autologous cells selected by
them. Based on these comments and
experience, FDA believes that the draft
guidance would not, if finalized in
current form, reflect FDA’s current
thinking. For these reasons, FDA is
withdrawing the draft guidance entitled
‘‘Draft Guidance for Industry: Cell
Selection Devices for Point of Care
Production of Minimally Manipulated
Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cells
(PBSCs).’’
Dated: August 10, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011–20862 Filed 8–16–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:13 Aug 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Guidance for Industry on Residual
Drug in Transdermal and Related Drug
Delivery Systems; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a guidance for industry
entitled ‘‘Residual Drug in Transdermal
and Related Drug Delivery Systems.’’
This guidance provides
recommendations to developers and
manufacturers of transdermal drug
delivery systems (TDDS), transmucosal
drug delivery systems (TMDS), and
topical patch products regarding use of
an appropriate scientific approach
during product design and
development—as well as during
manufacturing and product life-cycle
management—to ensure that the amount
of residual drug substance at the end of
the labeled use period is minimized.
The guidance is applicable to
investigational new drug applications,
new drug applications, abbreviated new
drug applications, and supplemental
new drug applications for TDDS, TMDS,
and topical patch products.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments on Agency guidances
at any time.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for
single copies of this guidance to the
Division of Drug Information, Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 2201,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to
assist that office in processing your
requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the guidance document.
Submit electronic comments on the
guidance to https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terrance Ocheltree, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, Bldg. 21, rm.
1609, 10903 New Hampshire Ave.,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–
796–1988.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2011 / Notices
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of
a guidance for industry entitled
‘‘Residual Drug in Transdermal and
Related Drug Delivery Systems.’’ This
guidance provides recommendations to
developers and manufacturers of TDDS,
TMDS, and topical patch products
regarding use of an appropriate
scientific approach during product
design and development—as well as
during manufacturing and product lifecycle management—to ensure that the
amount of residual drug substance at the
end of the labeled use period is
minimized. In the Federal Register of
August 3, 2010 (75 FR 45640), FDA
announced the availability of the draft
version of this guidance. The public
comment period closed on November 1,
2010. A number of comments were
received from the public, all of which
the Agency considered carefully as it
finalized the guidance and made
appropriate changes. Any changes to the
guidance were minor and made to
clarify statements in the draft guidance.
Existing TDDS, TMDS, and topical
patches contain a larger amount of the
drug substance than what is intended to
be delivered to the patient. This excess
amount of drug substance is needed to
facilitate delivery of the intended
amount of the drug to the patient and
remains as residual drug in the used
system. The amount of residual drug
substance in TDDS, TMDS, and topical
patches has a significant potential to
impact the products’ quality, efficacy,
and safety (including abuse potential).
Consequently, it is necessary to ensure
that an appropriate scientific approach
is used to design and develop these
products. The approach should ensure
that the amount of residual drug
substance is minimized consistent with
the current state of technology.
Currently marketed TDDS, TMDS,
and topical patches may retain 10 to 95
percent of the initial total amount of
drug as the residual drug after the
intended use period. This raises a
potential safety issue not only to the
patient, but also to others, including
family members, caregivers, children,
and pets. For example, adverse events
due to a patient’s failure to remove
TDDS at the end of the intended use
period have been reported and are
generally related to an increased or
prolonged pharmacological effect of the
drug. Also, some children have died
from inadvertent exposure to discarded
TDDS. Reported adverse events
resulting from various quality problems
pertaining to TDDS have lead to product
recalls, withdrawals, and public health
advisories.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:13 Aug 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
To reduce some of these risks, the
Agency recommends that a robust
design and development approach be
considered when developing and
manufacturing TDDS, TMDS, and
topical patches. One example of such an
approach is quality by design, as
described in the International
Conference on Harmonization guidance
for industry entitled ‘‘Q8(R2)
Pharmaceutical Development.’’ The
Agency also recommends that sufficient
scientific justification to support the
amount of residual drug in TDDS,
TMDS, or topical patches be included in
an application. The justification should
include an evaluation of the safety risks
involved with the formulation and
system design, as well as support the
amount of drug load in the TDDS,
TMDS, or topical patch based on the
proposed quality target product profile
and formulation studies. Most
important, the justification for
applications of products with known
safety issues—such as those with
fentanyl-containing liquid reservoir
systems—should demonstrate that the
safety risk factors have been adequately
mitigated.
In all cases, the level of information
in the justification should be sufficient
to demonstrate product and process
understanding and ensure that a
scientific, risk-based approach has been
taken to minimize the amount of
residual drug in a system after use to the
lowest possible level. It is expected that
the amount of residual drug in a newly
developed system (including new
generic drug products) will not exceed
that of similar FDA-approved products.
This guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The guidance represents the Agency’s
current thinking on residual drug in
transdermal and related drug delivery
systems. It does not create or confer any
rights for or on any person and does not
operate to bind FDA or the public. An
alternative approach may be used if
such approach satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations.
II. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written
comments regarding this document. It is
only necessary to send one set of
comments. It is no longer necessary to
send two copies of mailed comments.
Identify comments with the docket
number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51039
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
III. The Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995
This guidance refers to previously
approved collections of information
found in FDA regulations. These
collections of information are subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520). Information in an application on
the product and process development
and justification for the final
formulation and system design is
approved under OMB control numbers
0910–0001 and 0910–0014.
IV. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the document at either
https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/Guidance
ComplianceRegulatoryInformation/
Guidances/default.htm or https://
www.regulations.gov.
Dated: August 10, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011–20852 Filed 8–16–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0013]
Statement of Organizations, Functions,
and Delegations of Authority
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that it has reorganized the Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)
by establishing four new Divisions
under the Office of Generic Drugs. This
reorganization includes the organization
and their substructure components as
listed in this document. This document
is announcing the availability of the
Staff Manual Guide that explains the
details of this reorganization.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen Koenick, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research (HFD–063),
Food and Drug Administration, 1919
Rockville Pike, Rm. 324, Rockville, MD
20852, 301–796–4422.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Summary
The Statement of Organization,
Functions, and Delegations of Authority
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 159 (Wednesday, August 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51038-51039]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20852]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2010-D-0246]
Guidance for Industry on Residual Drug in Transdermal and Related
Drug Delivery Systems; Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a guidance for industry entitled ``Residual Drug in
Transdermal and Related Drug Delivery Systems.'' This guidance provides
recommendations to developers and manufacturers of transdermal drug
delivery systems (TDDS), transmucosal drug delivery systems (TMDS), and
topical patch products regarding use of an appropriate scientific
approach during product design and development--as well as during
manufacturing and product life-cycle management--to ensure that the
amount of residual drug substance at the end of the labeled use period
is minimized. The guidance is applicable to investigational new drug
applications, new drug applications, abbreviated new drug applications,
and supplemental new drug applications for TDDS, TMDS, and topical
patch products.
DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on Agency guidances
at any time.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of this guidance
to the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
51, rm. 2201, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send one self-addressed
adhesive label to assist that office in processing your requests. See
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic access to the
guidance document.
Submit electronic comments on the guidance to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terrance Ocheltree, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Bldg. 21, rm.
1609, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-
1988.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 51039]]
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of a guidance for industry
entitled ``Residual Drug in Transdermal and Related Drug Delivery
Systems.'' This guidance provides recommendations to developers and
manufacturers of TDDS, TMDS, and topical patch products regarding use
of an appropriate scientific approach during product design and
development--as well as during manufacturing and product life-cycle
management--to ensure that the amount of residual drug substance at the
end of the labeled use period is minimized. In the Federal Register of
August 3, 2010 (75 FR 45640), FDA announced the availability of the
draft version of this guidance. The public comment period closed on
November 1, 2010. A number of comments were received from the public,
all of which the Agency considered carefully as it finalized the
guidance and made appropriate changes. Any changes to the guidance were
minor and made to clarify statements in the draft guidance.
Existing TDDS, TMDS, and topical patches contain a larger amount of
the drug substance than what is intended to be delivered to the
patient. This excess amount of drug substance is needed to facilitate
delivery of the intended amount of the drug to the patient and remains
as residual drug in the used system. The amount of residual drug
substance in TDDS, TMDS, and topical patches has a significant
potential to impact the products' quality, efficacy, and safety
(including abuse potential). Consequently, it is necessary to ensure
that an appropriate scientific approach is used to design and develop
these products. The approach should ensure that the amount of residual
drug substance is minimized consistent with the current state of
technology.
Currently marketed TDDS, TMDS, and topical patches may retain 10 to
95 percent of the initial total amount of drug as the residual drug
after the intended use period. This raises a potential safety issue not
only to the patient, but also to others, including family members,
caregivers, children, and pets. For example, adverse events due to a
patient's failure to remove TDDS at the end of the intended use period
have been reported and are generally related to an increased or
prolonged pharmacological effect of the drug. Also, some children have
died from inadvertent exposure to discarded TDDS. Reported adverse
events resulting from various quality problems pertaining to TDDS have
lead to product recalls, withdrawals, and public health advisories.
To reduce some of these risks, the Agency recommends that a robust
design and development approach be considered when developing and
manufacturing TDDS, TMDS, and topical patches. One example of such an
approach is quality by design, as described in the International
Conference on Harmonization guidance for industry entitled ``Q8(R2)
Pharmaceutical Development.'' The Agency also recommends that
sufficient scientific justification to support the amount of residual
drug in TDDS, TMDS, or topical patches be included in an application.
The justification should include an evaluation of the safety risks
involved with the formulation and system design, as well as support the
amount of drug load in the TDDS, TMDS, or topical patch based on the
proposed quality target product profile and formulation studies. Most
important, the justification for applications of products with known
safety issues--such as those with fentanyl-containing liquid reservoir
systems--should demonstrate that the safety risk factors have been
adequately mitigated.
In all cases, the level of information in the justification should
be sufficient to demonstrate product and process understanding and
ensure that a scientific, risk-based approach has been taken to
minimize the amount of residual drug in a system after use to the
lowest possible level. It is expected that the amount of residual drug
in a newly developed system (including new generic drug products) will
not exceed that of similar FDA-approved products.
This guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The guidance represents the
Agency's current thinking on residual drug in transdermal and related
drug delivery systems. It does not create or confer any rights for or
on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. An
alternative approach may be used if such approach satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.
II. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments regarding this
document. It is only necessary to send one set of comments. It is no
longer necessary to send two copies of mailed comments. Identify
comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
III. The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This guidance refers to previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations. These collections of information
are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Information in an application on the product and process development
and justification for the final formulation and system design is
approved under OMB control numbers 0910-0001 and 0910-0014.
IV. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at
either https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm or https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: August 10, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-20852 Filed 8-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P